Bolus Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements Research Articles

The Precision of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Bolus Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements Varies With the Clinical Situation.

To investigate the effects of ventilatory mode, injectate temperature, and clinical situation on the precision of cardiac output measurements. Randomized, prospective observational study. Single university hospital. Forty patients undergoing planned cardiac surgery, receiving a pulmonary artery catheter according to institutional routine. Cardiac output was measured at 4 predefined time points during the perioperative patient course, twice during controlled and twice during spontaneous ventilation, using 2 blocks of 8 measurement replications with cold and tepid injectate in random order. The data were analyzed using a hierarchical linear mixed model. Clinical precision was determined as half the width of the 95% confidence interval for the underlying true value. The single-measurement precision measured in 2 different clinical situations for each temperature/ventilation combination was 8% to 10%, 11% to 13%, 13% to 15%, and 23% to 24% in controlled ventilation with cold injectate, controlled ventilation with tepid injectate, spontaneous breathing with cold injectate, and spontaneous breathing with tepid injectate, respectively. Tables are provided for the number of replications needed to achieve a certain precision and for how to identify significant changes in cardiac output. Clinical precision of cardiac output measurements is reduced significantly during spontaneous relative to controlled ventilation. The differences in precision between repeated measurement series within the temperature/ventilation combinations indicate influence of other situation-specific factors not related to ventilatory mode. Compared with tepid injectate in patients breathing spontaneously, the precision is 3-fold better with cold injectate and controlled ventilation.

Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry in cardiac surgery

Summary The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of pulse dye densitometry with that of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurement in patients before and after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Twenty-eight patients were studied. Agreement between mean thermodilution and pulse dye densitometry cardiac output values was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Preoperative median [range] cardiac output was 3.87 [2.37-6.0] l.min(-1) by thermodilution, and 3.11 [1.7-5.45] l.min(-1) by pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green 5 mg. Pulse dye densitometry underestimated cardiac output (mean bias - 0.42 l.min(-1)); the limits of agreement were +/- 1.91 l.min(-1), and mean error was 50.3%, indicating low precision. Preoperative median [range] cardiac output was 3.85 [2.2-6.0] l.min(-1) for bolus thermodilution cardiac output and 4.2 [2.0-7.2] l.min(-1) for pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green 20 mg. Mean bias was + 0.566 l.min(-1), the limits of agreement were +/- 2.51 l.min(-1) and mean error was 60.9%. Postoperative cardiac output data were not analysed because pulse dye densitometry signals were low or absent in > 50% of the patients. We conclude that pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green 5 mg or 20 mg is inaccurate in anaesthetised patients before coronary artery bypass surgery and cannot be used after surgery because of a high incidence of low pulse dye densitometry signal amplitudes.

Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation

The precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not previously been determined. A priori we suspected that the precision would be lower in patients with AF than in patients with sinus rhythm (SR). Consequently, we also determined if the precision could be improved by injecting the thermal indicator into the right ventricle instead of the right atrium. Cardiac output was determined as the average result of four injections of 10 ml of iced saline. Replicate measurements were performed with thermal indicator injections into the right atrium and ventricle. The coefficients of variation and the precisions were calculated. In the 25 patients with AF, mean cardiac output was 3.96 l min(-1) (range 2.4-7.4), the coefficient of variation 0.073 (95% CI +/- 0.011), and the precision 0.38 l min(-1) (95% CI +/- 0.14) with injection into the right atrium. In the 25 patients with SR, mean cardiac output was 4.73 l min(-1) (range 2.4-7.3), the coefficient of variation 0.047(95% CI +/- 0.006), and the precision 0.38 l min(-1) (95% CI +/- 0.14). In both groups, an agreement analysis demonstrated that the injection of indicator into the right ventricle resulted in a significantly higher cardiac output [AF+0.25 (95% CI +/- 0.15) l min(-1), SR+0.29 ( +/- 0.20) l min(-1)]. The coefficient of variation for cardiac output determinations is 55% higher in patients with AF. Two measurements, separated by time or intervention, must differ by 15% in AF patients and 9% in SR patients before one can be 95% confident that a real change has taken place.

Thermodilution cardiac output – are three injections enough?

Bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements have been a mainstay in clinical monitoring of critically ill patients for more than 30 years. Usually the results of an arbitrarily chosen number (1-6) of thermal indicator injections are averaged to increase the reliability of the measurement. The number of injections needed to achieve a given level of precision has, however, not previously been systematically investigated. In 80 hemodynamically stable patients cardiac output was determined as the average of eight injections of 10 ml of iced saline. From the 638 measurements we examined the relationship between the number of thermal indicator injections and the precision of the resulting cardiac output estimate. Furthermore, the association between the number of injections and the least detectable difference among two sets of measurements was established. The current study shows that one needs to average the results of four injections to be 95% confident that the result is within 5% of the 'true' cardiac output and that two series of four measurements have to differ by at least 7% before one can be sure (95%) that a change in cardiac function has taken place.

A Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurements between Non-Invasive Partial Rebreathing Method and Invasive Intermittent Thermodilution Method during Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Background: A reliable non-invasive cardiac output measurement could enhance patient safety and reduce risk. Partial rebreathing cardiac output (RBCO) measurement is a non-invasive method based on a differential form of the CO₂ Fick equation. The relative change in CO₂ and ETCO in response to addition of dead space to the breathing circuit is used to measure cardiac output, The aim of this study was to compare this method in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients during pre-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and post-CPB with the currently accepted technique of intermittent thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) measurement. Methods: Eleven patients (n = 11, age 5O ± 13 years) undergoing CABG operations with CPB were studied. We measured the cardiac output non-invasively by using a RBCO monitor (NICO, Novametrix Medical Systems Inc., USA) and used SpO and FiOy to correct for intrapulmonary shunts. Invasively, using a pulmonary artery catheter (Hands-Off Thermodilution Catheter, Arrow Co., USA) and 10 ml of iced 5% dextrose, an average of three consecutive TDCO was measured during end- expiration and compared with corresponding RBCO during pre-CPB and post-CPB for a total of 6 times respectively. Data was analyzed by paired T-test with significance set at P value < 0.05. Results: Pre-CPB paired T-test analysis revealed no significant difference between partial rebreathing and bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements. On the other hand, post-CPB differences between the two methods were significant (P < 0.05) and tended to decrease with time. Similarly, Pa-ETCO₂ was mcreased abnormally after CPB, then decreased with time to a normal value. Conclusion: Post-CPB, partial rebreathing cardiac output did not correlate well with the thermodilution cardiac output. As a cause for the differences of the two cardiac output measurements, we could consider a thertnal noise during thermodilution and an inadequate correction for the shunts in partial rebreathing measurements, but further investigation is needed.

Semicontinuous cardiac output monitoring using a neural network.

This study compared 2-mL bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements with standard 10-mL bolus measurements. Cardiac output was measured with the new 2-mL bolus technique and the 10-mL standard thermodilution technique in a perspective series. We describe a system that automatically cools and injects 2-mL boluses of saline into a standard pulmonary artery catheter. It uses a Peltier effect solid-state cooler and pneumatically driven syringe injector to measure cardiac output once per minute. Animal laboratory. Eight adult Duroc swine weighing between 38.0 and 57.5 kg. Once each minute, 2 mL of cooled 5% dextrose was injected through the pulmonary catheter. Once every 8 mins, four sequential measurements of cardiac output were made using 10-mL injections. A total of 1249 paired waveforms were processed with both a conventional algorithm and with a neural network. For the conventional algorithm, the correlation coefficient was r2 = .92 and the SD of the difference was 1.30 L/min. For the neural network, the correlation coefficient was r2 = .94 and the SD of the difference was 0.88 L/min. Output filtering improved the results in both cases. Neural networks accurately derive cardiac output from 2-mL bolus thermodilution injections, allowing cardiac output to be monitored automatically once per minute in many patients. The technique is convenient and uses standard low-cost catheters.

Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in critically i11 patients with analysis of systematic errors

Purpose: Bolus thermodilution cardiac output (BCO) measurements are affected by variations in injectate volume, rate, and temperature. These variations are eliminated when CO is measured by a continuous automated thermal technique (CCO). Further, CCO eliminates the need for fluid boluses, reduces contamination risk, requires no operator, and provides a continuous CO trend. We prospectively evaluated CCO versus BCO in a population of critically ill adults with low, normal, and high CO states. We sought to discern any systematic effects of temperature fluctuations or signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) on disparities between BCO and CCO measurements and also sought to assess the relative cost effectiveness of the CCO system. Materials and Methods: Pulmonary artery catheterizations were performed in a convenience sample of 20 patients over 6 months. BCO data were obtained using a standardized protocol. Three bolus injections of 5% dextrose were given when each CO was within 10% of the median before averaging; otherwise five boluses were given, with the high and low values eliminated before averaging. Injectates were administered randomly through the respiratory cycle and at 1-minute intervals. CCO measurements were recorded from a Vigilance monitor pre and post BCO measurements, yielding an average CCO value. Also recorded were pre- and post-core temperatures and SNR during the first CCO measurement. Cost data included estimates of operator time for BCO determinations as well as costs of Intellicath (Baxter-Edwards, Irvine, CA) pulmonary artery catheters, Vigilance (Baxter-Edwards, Irvine, CA) monitors, conventional catheters, and injectates. Results: Of the 20 patients, 15 were mechanically ventilated. A total of 306 paired CO values were obtained for analysis. CCO ranged from 2.5 to 14.4 L/min and SCO from 2.4 to 13.3 L/min. Absolute differences between CCO and BCO measurements increased with increasing CO, but percentage differences did not. Of the paired values, 77% were within 1 L/min of one another. Temperature instability and SNR independently had weak correlations with CCO/BCO disparities. The Vigilance system had a slightly higher net cost than conventional BCO, although no economical value was assigned to the clinical usefulness of continuous, as opposed to intermittent, CO monitoring. Conclusions: Continuous CO is a reliable and cost-effective alternative to bolus thermodilution CO for critically ill patients in low, normal, and high CO states.

Comparison of continuous with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements

Few complete studies have been published to validate the agreement between continuous cardiac output and intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. To analyze the agreement between cardiac output measurements by the continuous thermodilution method and the intermittent bolus thermodilution method, using a continuous cardiac output catheter in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients. A convenience sample of 14 adult cardiothoracic surgical patients with thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters placed preoperatively was used. A total of 214 comparison measurements of cardiac output by both the continuous and intermittent thermodilution methods were taken on patient admission to the critical care unit, every 4 hours, and with any change greater than 10% from baseline readings. The intraclass correlation between continuous cardiac output and intermittent cardiac output was .89. The limits of agreement were -1.34 to 1.18 L/min, indicating that in 95% of readings the difference between continuous cardiac output and intermittent cardiac output were within this range. The continuous cardiac output monitoring method shows clinically acceptable agreement with the intermittent cardiac output method.