Embedded plates (EPs) are commonly used to connect steel to reinforced concrete elements. Due to a lack of industry-wide standard designs, EPs are custom designed for every instance in each project. This leads to many inefficiencies in the construction process and introduces susceptibilities to error. North American design standards based on the concrete capacity design (CCD) philosophy require many assumptions to predict EP capacity, which then lead to inconsistencies in their application. CCD is also well suited for analysis as it depends on a considerable numbers of variables (e.g., edge distances, anchor size, number, and length) to check capacity. The sheer number of variables makes it difficult for designers to come up with a trial design to fit a situation. This study aims to improve the efficiency of this process by proposing standard EPs. A subset of these proposed standard EPs are then experimentally tested to verify predicted capacities and evaluate design assumptions using existing CCD approaches in North America. Four- and six-anchor proposed standard EPs with shear tab connections were placed at four distances from the concrete edge (75–250 mm) and tested in shear towards the edge. North American provisions for concrete anchorage were adequate in predicting the failure loads if connection eccentricity, caused by the gap between the shear tab bolt line and the exposed surface of the plate, is considered in capacity predictions. Mean test-to-predicted ratios of 0.92 and 1.05 were obtained, respectively, when not considering and considering this eccentricity. Rotations of these connections during testing (0.01 to 0.02 rad at peak load with further rotations post-peak) and signs of secondary tension breakout cones suggest that connection eccentricity significantly affects the behavior of EPs and should be considered in design.
Read full abstract