Body Perception Disturbance Research Articles

Body awareness disturbances in patients with low back pain: a systematic review.

The pain-neuroscience literature has recently emphasized body perception or awareness. Impaired body perception results have been reported in many different chronic pain problems. Studies have reported that individuals with low back pain (LBP) also have body perception disturbances related to the lumbar spine. This review aimed to determine the evidence that body awareness alterations in individuals with LBP. Systematic review. Studies were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Pedro databases up to January 2021. Each database was searched independently, according to a specific iteration research string. The protocol record of the systematic review was entered into the PROSPERO system. Nine studies were included in this research. We found evidence to support more perceptual impairments in patients with LBP than healthy counterparts. In addition, the results of the studies showed an association between disrupted body awareness and pain severity, pain catastrophizing, and disability. Body perception disturbances in LBP seem to be a promising path that needs to be further explored, with the ultimate goal of developing treatment contents targeting body awareness as a more comprehensive and valid evaluation and therapeutic method. The registration number was CRD42021235934.

Characterizing clinical progression in patients with musculoskeletal pain by pain severity and central sensitization-related symptoms

Central sensitization-related symptoms (CSS) are associated with the severity and progression of pain. The relationship between the severity of pain/CSS and clinical progresses remains unclear. This multicenter, collaborative, longitudinal study aimed to characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with musculoskeletal pain by classifying subgroups based on the severity of pain/CSS and examining changes in subgroups over time. We measured the pain intensity, CSS, catastrophic thinking, and body perception disturbance in 435 patients with musculoskeletal pain. Reevaluation of patients after one month included 166 patients for pain intensity outcome and 110 for both pain intensity and CSS outcome analysis. We classified the patients into four groups (mild pain/CSS, severe pain/mild CSS, severe pain/CSS, and mild pain/severe CSS groups) and performed multiple comparison analyses to reveal the differences between the CSS severity groups. Additionally, we performed the adjusted residual chi-square to identify the number of patients with pain improvement, group transition, changing pain, and CSS pattern groups at baseline. The most characteristic result was that the mild and severe CSS groups showed worsening pain. Moreover, many of the group transitions were to the same group, with a few transitioning to a group with mild pain/CSS. Our findings suggest that the severity and improvement of CSS influence pain prognosis.

Investigation for Factors Affecting Body Perception Disturbance in Patients with Low Back Pain by Mechanism-Based Classification of Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Central sensitization is a pathophysiological cause of chronic low back pain and is linked with psychosocial factors. The association between central sensitization (CS) and body perception disturbance is currently unclear, and no prior studies have investigated this relationship in patients with acute or subacute low back pain. The objective of this study was to investigate potential factors that influence body perception disturbance using a mechanistic classification of low back pain. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the time of initial physical therapy in patients with low back pain. During the study period, 169 patients were recruited. Pain intensity, disease duration, disability, CS, and body perception disturbance were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups according to the pathology of low back pain, and multivariate analysis was used to examine factors affecting body perception disturbance. The dependent variable was Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ); the independent variables were age, gender, BMI, VAS, disease duration, RDQ, and CS Inventory-9 (CSI-9). A total of 117 patients were included in our analysis. According to the mechanistic classification of pain, 66 (56.4%), 36 (30.8%), and 15 (12.8%) patients were categorized as having nociceptive pain (NP), peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP), and CS pain (CSP), respectively. Patients with PNP or CSP were significantly older than those with NP (p < 0.01). FreBAQ and RDQ scores were significantly higher in patients with CSP than those with NP (p < 0.05). The results of multiple regression analyses indicated that CSI-9 scores were significantly associated with FreBAQ (p < 0.01). Patients with CS syndrome and low back pain tend to have higher CSI-9 scores and be older. Body perception disturbance is influenced by CS or CS syndrome, regardless of the stage of low back pain, suggesting that patients with chronic low back pain tend to have low body image.

Virtual reality in managing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): a scoping review.

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a severe pain disorder that does not yet have a specific treatment. Patients with CRPS not only suffer from a wide range of symptoms that affect their quality of life but also present psychological affections to the way they see their body and specifically their affected limb. Virtual Reality (VR) modalities have become a targeted treatment for chronic pain and in the case of CRPS, may be a valuable approach to the mechanisms that affect these patients. Using the PRISMA Scoping Review guidelines, we intend to uncover the key information from the studies available about VR modalities in the treatment of CRPS. We focus on the improvement of pain levels, body perception disturbances (BPD), and limb movement/daily function. Our search strategy resulted in 217 articles from PubMed. Twenty were assessed for eligibility and seven were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Of these seven articles, we included a clinical trial, three pilot studies, a blinded randomized controlled trial, a crossover double-blind trial, and a randomized controlled trial. These studies provide important subjective patient findings, along with some statistically significant results in the experiences of VR therapies modulating pain, BPD, and improving limb movement/daily function. However, not all the studies included statistical analysis, and there are contradicting data found from some patients that did not perceive any improvement from VR therapies. We describe the results found in 7 articles that focus on the treatment of CRPS with VR modalities. Overall, the articles have various limitations, but the strategies related to immersive virtual reality, cardiac signaling, body switching and limb modulation have shown the most promising results for pain reduction and BPD improvement. These strategies reflect on pathophysiological mechanisms that are hypothesized to be affected in CRPS patients leading to the chronic pain and BPD that they experience. Not much evidence was found for improvement in limb movement and daily function. This review is a pathway for future studies on this topic and a more extensive data synthesis when more information is available.

Virtual embodiment in fibromyalgia

Chronic pain alters the experience of owning a body and leads to disturbances in bodily perception. We tested whether women with fibromyalgia (FM) are receptive to bodily illusions of owning a visible and progressively invisible body in immersive virtual reality (VR), and what modulates this experience. Twenty patients participated in two experimental sessions; each session included two conditions in a counterbalanced order. We found that patients with FM could indeed experience virtual embodiment. Sentiment analysis revealed significantly more positive reactions to the progressively invisible body, yet twice as many patients declared they preferred the illusion of a visible virtual body. A linear mixed model revealed that the strength of embodiment was positively associated with body perception disturbances and negatively associated with FM symptoms intensity. No effect of pain during the VR experience nor interoception awareness on embodiment was found. The results indicated that patients with FM are receptive to virtual bodily illusions and that the impact of the embodiment depends on affective reactions, the level of cognitive body distortions, and the intensity of symptoms. Importantly, there is a large variation among patients which should be considered in future VR-based interventions.

Central sensitization in CRPS patients with widespread pain: a cross-sectional study.

Widespread pain hypersensitivity and enhanced temporal summation of pain (TSP) are commonly reported in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and discussed as proxies for central sensitization. This study aimed to directly relate such signs of neuronal hyperexcitability to the pain phenotype of CRPS patients. Twenty-one CRPS patients and 20 healthy controls (HC) were recruited. The pain phenotype including spatial pain extent (assessed in % body surface) and intensity were assessed and related to widespread pain hypersensitivity, TSP, and psychological factors. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed in the affected, the contralateral and a remote (control) area. CRPS patients showed decreased pressure pain thresholds in all tested areas (affected: t(34) = 4.98, P < .001, contralateral: t(35) = 3.19, P = .005, control: t(31) = 2.65, P = .012). Additionally, patients showed increased TSP in the affected area (F(3,111) = 4.57, P = .009) compared to HC. TSP was even more enhanced in patients with a high compared to a low spatial pain extent (F(3,51) = 5.67, P = .008), suggesting pronounced spinal sensitization in patients with extended pain patterns. Furthermore, the spatial pain extent positively correlated with the Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale (ρ = 0.491; P = .048). Overall, we provide evidence that the pain phenotype in CRPS, that is, spatial pain extent, might be related to sensitization mechanism within the central nociceptive system. This study points towards central neuronal excitability as a potential therapeutic target in patients with more widespread CRPS.

"My Hand Is Different": Altered Body Perception in Stroke Survivors with Chronic Pain.

Background: Chronic pain and body perception disturbance are common following stroke. It is possible that an interaction exists between pain and body perception disturbance, and that a change in one may influence the other. We therefore investigated the presence of body perception disturbance in individuals with stroke, aiming to determine if a perceived change in hand size contralateral to the stroke lesion is more common in those with chronic pain than in those without. Methods: Stroke survivors (N = 523) completed an online survey that included: stroke details, pain features, and any difference in perceived hand size post-stroke. Results: Individuals with stroke who experienced chronic pain were almost three times as likely as those without chronic pain to perceive their hand as now being a different size (OR = 2.895; 95%CI 1.844, 4.547). Further, those with chronic pain whose pain included the hand were almost twice as likely to perceive altered hand size than those whose pain did not include the hand (OR = 1.862; 95%CI 1.170, 2.962). This was not influenced by hemisphere of lesion (p = 0.190). Conclusions: The results point to a new characteristic of chronic pain in stroke, raising the possibility of body perception disturbance being a rehabilitation target to improve function and pain-related outcomes for stroke survivors.

OA03 “I can't stand this pain anymore. Please chop my leg off.” Is amputation a therapeutic option for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in children and young people?

Introduction/BackgroundComplex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic intensified localised pain condition. Symptoms may include limb pain, allodynia; hyperalgesia; swelling and/or changes in skin colour of the affected limb; dry, mottled skin; hyperhidrosis and trophic changes of the nails and hair. There is no known cure. Management involves analgesic medication and intensive multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation. Some cases however seem intractable, with little or no response to therapy. Some patients feel amputation of the affected limb is the only possible option. We present four cases of children and young adults requesting amputation for CRPS.Description/MethodCase 1: 13 years, CRPS left leg, with associated gross oedema, ulceration and high risk of sepsis.Case 2: 16 years, CRPS both feet and ankles, ulceration, fixed dystonic posturing bilaterally, Autistic Spectrum DisorderCase 3: 17 years, mild cerebral palsy affecting left side, passionate about sport, development of CRPS following surgery for tendon release right hip flexors, fixed flexion contractures at right hip and knee. Case 4:17 years, high functioning athlete, CRPS initially foot and ankle, contractures ankle, knee and hip; progression to involve other leg.In each of these cases, prolonged intensive therapeutic interventions have not been successful in restoring function or reducing pain. All have requested amputation of the affected limb(s).Discussion/ResultsThe tabloid press has reported the transforming success of amputation for some cases of CRPS, describing individuals who have had CRPS which has not responded to treatment finally having the affected limb amputated, and subsequently achieving great things - including winning medals in the Para-Olympics. Unsurprisingly such success stories provide hope for some enduring CRPS and becomes part of their ‘evidence’ for requesting amputation.The scientific literature however is sparce, and virtually non-existent in children and young people. The risks of ongoing pain in the stump; recurrence of CRPS in the amputated limb - or elsewhere; phantom limb pain and inability to tolerate a prosthesis are well documented in the adult literature that is available. Key learning points/ConclusionDespite this, for the child/young person experiencing not only pain, but disgust, shame and body perception disturbance, the argument for amputation can be strong, and has to be considered. We present the evidence to date and share the complexity of such discussions, focusing on the experience gained from these cases.

Assessment of body perception disturbances in complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review using the COSMIN guideline.

To conduct a systematic review to identify which tools are being used to assess body perception disturbances in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and to provide an evidence-based recommendation in the selection of an assessment tool, based on measurement properties. Five electronic databases (EMBASE, Pubmed, PsycInfo, Science Direct and Web of Science) were searched for English or French written articles, with no time restrictions. All original articles using a body perception assessment tool with adult patients with CRPS were selected, regardless of their design (controlled trials, single case, qualitative study). Two investigators screened abstracts, selected full articles and extracted data independently. Thirty-eight full-text papers were obtained and three main methods to evaluate body perception disturbances were identified: The Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale, the Neglect-like Symptoms questionnaire adapted from Galer and the patient's body perception description. No full psychometric assessments were found. The Limb Laterality Recognition Task was also used in conjunction with another method. Three main assessment methods for CRPS body perception disturbances are currently used. Full psychometric evaluation has not been completed for any of the assessment methods. As a consequence, we could not fully apply the COSMIN guideline. To date, there is no agreement concerning the use of a specific questionnaire or scale. The results indicate a need for further research such as psychometric properties of these questionnaires. This systematic review identified body perception disturbances assessment methods and their the psychometric properties in order to provide help and guidance to researchers and clinicians to investigate those clinical features.

Nociceptive two-point discrimination acuity and body representation failure in polyneuropathy.

Although patients' complaints suggest polyneuropathy (PNP) and neuropathic pain, routine investigations do not always support the diagnosis. Assessing two-point-pain discrimination thresholds (2ptDT) and quantify body representation disturbances might be useful to close this diagnostic gap. Pinprick pain and laser-heat pain perception thresholds and 2ptDT on hands, forearms, lower legs and feet were obtained in 20 PNP patients (mean age: 57.6±13.9) and 20 healthy subjects (mean age: 50.6±4.7years). Body representation disturbances were assessed by self-estimating feet size and the Bath CRPS body perception disturbances questionnaire adapted for PNP. Pain perception thresholds and laser-heat pain 2ptDT were unaltered, but patients had higher pinprick pain 2ptDT then the healthy subjects. The 2ptDT for pinprick at the hands discriminate best between groups (U-test; p=0.001). Furthermore, patients estimated their feet longer than they are. In subsequent multivariate discriminant analyses, 2ptDT for pinprick pain at the hands, 2ptDT for laser-heat pain and the perception thresholds for laser-heat pain at the feet classified 85% of PNP vs. HC correctly. The combination of 2ptDT for pinprick pain at the hands, pinprick pain perception thresholds at the calves and foot length estimation differentiates painful vs. non-painful PNPs correctly in 90% of the cases. Testing 2ptDT for painful pinprick stimuli at the hands and asking for foot length estimation might add to diagnostic accuracy in painful PNP.

P286 Allied healthcare professional interventions for complex regional pain syndrome - which work? A systematic review of the literature

Abstract Background/Aims Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a severe chronic pain condition which usually occurs following limb trauma. Also associated with a range of signs and symptoms, including limb oedema, sensitivity to touch, skin colour and temperature changes, CRPS causes significant burden to individuals and society. UK 2018 guidelines for CRPS recommend early referral for therapies that encourage limb movement and use. Allied healthcare professionals (AHPs) are instrumental in delivering this early rehabilitation. The aim of this review was to explore current literature to identify non-surgical and non-pharmaceutical interventions for CRPS that are likely to be, or could be, delivered by AHPs, and to consider their therapeutic efficacy. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted between June and August 2021 using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL databases. Search terms were designed to identify studies of interventions for CRPS normally delivered by AHPs from 2010 onwards. Studies of surgical, pharmacological and psychotherapy/counselling interventions were excluded, as were those of post-stroke CRPS populations. Data were extracted for outcomes relating to pain, function, and quality of life. Results Following initial screening of 1,499 records, 40 articles were retained for further consideration. Of these, 14 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. From the data extracted, multidisciplinary rehabilitation was reported as effective in reducing pain, as was specific sensory-motor re-education using desensitisation; however, results for the efficacy of graded motor imagery on pain and function were contradictory. Neither ultrasound therapy or prism adaptation treatment were found to lead to improvements in either pain or function. Reduction in pain was a positive outcome of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) and of the use of visual illusions for people with body perception disturbance associated with CRPS. Whilst pain exposure physical therapy was associated with increased range of motion, there was no reported improvement in pain or quality of life. Low level laser therapy was found to be superior to inferential current therapy in pain reduction and range of motion. A methodological quality assessment of the studies in this review has yet to be conducted, however, it was noted that many of the studies acknowledged several limitations, not least the difficulty in recruiting a sample sufficient to demonstrate the statistical significance of indicative results. Conclusion Whilst there is some evidence for the efficacy of interventions for CRPS that are, or could be, delivered by AHPs, this review suggests only a small number of approaches have proved beneficial to date. A need remains for further research in order to provide guidance to support AHPs in treating this distressing condition. Disclosure G. Friend: None. N. Walsh: Grants/research support; NW has received funding for research from the NIHR. A. Llewellyn: Grants/research support; AL has received funding for research from the NIHR.

Body image and perception among adults with and without phantom limb pain.

Following lower-limb amputation, phantom limb pain (i.e., pain perceived as coming from the amputated portion of the limb) is common. Phantom limb pain may be associated with impaired body image and perception, which may be targets for rehabilitative intervention. To compare measures of body image and perception between adults with and without phantom limb pain post amputation and evaluate associations between measures of body image and perception and phantom limb pain. Survey. Online, remote assessment. Seventy-two adults ≥1 year post unilateral lower-limb loss (n=42 with phantom limb pain, n=30 without phantom limb pain or pain in the remaining portion of the limb). Not applicable. Self-reported outcome measures assessing body image (i.e., Amputee Body Image Scale-Revised), perceptual disturbances associated with the phantom limb (i.e., a modified Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Body Perception Disturbance Scale), and prosthesis satisfaction (i.e., Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale) were administered; participants with phantom limb pain reported pain interference via the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Between-group comparisons of self-reported outcome measure scores were conducted using Mann Whitney U or chi-square tests, as appropriate (a=.05). Compared to peers without phantom limb pain, adults with phantom limb pain reported more negative body image; increased phantom limb ownership, attention, and awareness; and reduced prosthesis satisfaction and embodiment (U=175.50-364.00, p < .001 to .034). Disturbances in phantom limb perception (i.e., size, weight, pressure, temperature) were similar between groups (p=.086 to >.999). More negative body image was associated with increased phantom limb pain interference (τb =.25, p=.026). Adults with phantom limb pain demonstrate more negative body image and hypervigilance of the phantom limb as compared to peers with nonpainful phantom sensations. Mind-body treatments that target impaired body image and perception may be critical interventions for adults with phantom limb pain.

Is obesity and body perception disturbance related to social media addiction among university students?

Objective The use of social networks has grown substantially over the past few years and especially during COVID-19. This study aims to investigate the possible relationship between social media addiction and obesity which may lead to disturbed body perception in university students. Participants: A total of 250 undergraduates participated. Results: Social media addiction depends on the number of years of social media use, meal skipping, and increased frequency of fast food consumption. There was a significant relationship between fast-food consumption frequency and body perception. No significant relationship was found between BMI and SMAS while there was a significant relationship between SMAS and body perception. Conclusion: The findings support, social media addiction may lead to increased risk factors for obesity and as a consequence impair body perception in young adults.

Sensory signs and symptoms in women with self-reported breast cancer-related lymphedema: a case-control study close up.

It is not clear to what extent signs and symptoms other than arm swelling, including pain, altered sensory function, and body perception disturbances, differ between women with measurable and non-measurable breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). A case-control study was performed to compare these signs and symptoms between (1) women with self-reported BCRL with objectively measurable swelling; (2) women with self-reported BCRL without objective confirmation; and (3) a control group with no self-reported BCRL. The three groups were compared for (1) the severity of self-reported signs and symptoms of BCRL, (2) problems in functioning related to BCRL, (3) pain-related outcomes, (4) sensory functions, and (5) body perception. All self-reported outcomes related to signs and symptoms of BCRL and problems in functioning were significantly different between the control group and the other two groups with and without measurable self-reported BCRL (p < 0.001-0.003). Except for "skin texture" (p = 0.01), "hand swelling" (p=0.301) and 'difficulty writing' (p=0.676), no differences were found between groups. For pain-related outcomes, sensory function, and body perception, significant differences were only found for the mechanical detection threshold (p < 0.01) and self-reported disturbances in body perception (p < 0.001) between the self-reported BCRL groups and control group. Diverse signs and symptoms related to BCRL, sensory function, and perception were different among women with self-reported BCRL compared to controls. No differences between women with and without measurable self-reported BCRL were found. The presence of self-reported BCRL, with or without measurable swelling, is a first indication for the need of further diagnostic evaluation.

The structural and functional connectivity neural underpinnings of body image.

How we perceive our bodies is fundamental to our self‐consciousness and our experience in the world. There are two types of interrelated internal body representations—a subjective experience of the position of a limb in space (body schema) and the subjective experience of the shape and size of the limb (body image). Body schema has been extensively studied, but there is no evidence of the brain structure and network dynamics underpinning body image. Here, we provide the first evidence for the extrastriate body area (EBA), a multisensory brain area, as the structural and functional neural substrate for body shape and size. We performed a multisensory finger‐stretch illusion that elongated the index finger. EBA volume and functional connectivity to the posterior parietal cortex are both related to the participants' susceptibility to the illusion. Taken together, these data suggest that EBA structure and connectivity encode body representation and body perception disturbances.

Validation of the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale

The Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Body Perception Disturbance Scale (“B-CRPS-BPDS”) measures alterations in body perception. We assessed its internal consistency, known group validity, construct validity, and associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. We also evaluated changes in, and baseline predictors of B-CRPS-BPDS scores at follow-up. We included people with CRPS (N = 114) and pain-free controls (N = 69). People with CRPS obtained higher scores than pain-free controls on all B-CRPS-BPDS items, except the item on attention. Because this item also had an insufficient corrected item-total correlation, we propose a revised B-CRPS-BPDS (r-B-CRPS-BPDS) excluding this item. The internal consistency of the r-B-CRPS-BPDS was good. The r-B-CRPS-BPDS showed a large positive relationship with “motor neglect-like symptoms”, indicating good construct validity. The r-B-CRPS-BPDS showed positive relationships with pain intensity, fear of movement, depression, and upper limb disability. There were no independent relationships with handedness, affected side, affected limb, disease duration, CRPS severity score, tension, anger, fatigue, confusion, and vigour. Finally, r-B-CRPS-BPDS scores did not consistently change over time. Our results demonstrate the utility of the r-B-CRPS-BPDS for measuring body perception disturbances in CRPS. PerspectiveThis article evaluates the validity of the Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Body Perception Disturbance Scale (“B-CRPS-BPDS”) in CRPS, and assesses relationships with demographic and clinical variables. The proposed revised B-CRPS-BPDS appears to be a valid measure of body perception disturbances in CRPS.

Visual illusions modulate body perception disturbance and pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A randomized trial.

Effective treatment of longstanding Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a challenge, as causal mechanisms remain elusive. People with CRPS frequently report distorted subjective perceptions of their affected limb. Evidence of pain reduction when the affected limb is visually altered in size suggests that visual illusions used to target central processing could restore coherence of this disrupted limb representation. We hypothesized that using virtual reality that alters hand image to match the patient's desired hand appearance would improve body perception disturbance and pain. Also, repeated exposure would maintain any therapeutic effect. A blinded randomized controlled trial of 45 participants with refractory upper-limb CRPS and body perception disturbance (BPD) viewed a digital image of their affected hand for 1min. The image was digitally altered according to the patient's description of how they desired their hand to look in the experimental group and unaltered in the control group. BPD and pain were measured pre- and post-intervention. A subgroup was followed up 2weeks after a course of repeated interventions. BPD (mean-6, ±SD 7.9, p=0.036, effect size [ES]=0.6) and pain intensity (mean-0.43, ±SD 1.3, p=0.047, ES=0.5) reduced in 23 participants after single exposure compared to controls (n=22). At follow-up, the subgroup (experimental n=21; control n=18) showed sustained pain reduction only (p=0.037, ±SD 1.9, ES=0.7), with an overall 1.2 decrease on an 11-point scale. Visually changing the CRPS hand to a desired appearance modulates BPD and pain suggesting therapeutic potential for those with refractory CRPS. Further research to optimize this therapeutic effect is required. Visual bodily illusions that change the shape and appearance of the painful CRPS hand to that desired by the patient result in a rapid amelioration of pain and body perception disturbance in people with longstanding CRPS. These findings highlight the future potential of this drug-free approach in the treatment of refractory CRPS.

Body perception disturbances in women with pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain and their role in the persistence of pain postpartum

BackgroundLumbopelvic pain (LPP) is common during pregnancy and can have long-lasting negative consequences in terms of disability and reduced quality of life. Therefore, it is crucial to identify women at risk of having pregnancy-related LPP after childbirth. This study aimed to investigate the association between body perception, pain intensity, and disability in women with pregnancy-related LPP during late pregnancy and postpartum, and to study whether a disturbed body perception during late pregnancy predicted having postpartum LPP.MethodsA prospective cohort study in 130 primiparous women (median age = 30 years) was performed. Pain intensity, disability, and lumbopelvic body perception during the last month of pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum were assessed with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index, and Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire, respectively. Having pregnancy-related LPP was defined as an NPRS score ≥ 1/10. At both timepoints, women were categorized into three groups; pain-free, LPP with low disability, and LPP with high disability (based on Oswestry Disability Index scores). At each timepoint, body perception was compared between groups, and correlations between body perception, pain intensity, and disability were evaluated in women with LPP by using non-parametric tests. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether body perception during the last month of pregnancy predicted the presence of LPP 6 weeks postpartum.ResultsWomen with LPP at the end of pregnancy, and 6 weeks postpartum reported a more disturbed body perception compared to pain-free women (p ≤ 0.005). Greater body perception disturbance correlated with higher pain intensity (σ = 0.266, p = 0.008) and disability (σ = 0.472, p < 0.001) during late pregnancy, and with pain intensity 6 weeks postpartum (σ = 0.403, p = 0.015). A disturbed body perception during late pregnancy nearly significantly predicted having postpartum LPP (Odds Ratio = 1.231, p = 0.052).ConclusionsBody perception disturbance was greater in women experiencing LPP during late pregnancy and postpartum compared to pain-free women, and correlated with pain intensity and disability. Though non-significant (p = 0.052), the results of the regression analysis suggest that greater body perception disturbance during late pregnancy might predict having LPP postpartum. However, future studies should follow up on this.

Validation of the Japanese version of the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale for CRPS.

Body perception disturbance is a common symptom and may be one of the key targets of treatment intervention in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). As a comprehensive assessment tool of body perception in patients with CRPS, the Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale (BPDS) was developed, and its adequate reliability and validity have been reported. However, there is no available Japanese version. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a Japanese version of BPDS (BPDS-J) and to investigate the validity of this scale in Japanese patients with CRPS. We developed BPDS-J using a forward-backward method. We then assessed 22 patients with CRPS type 1 of the upper limb using BPDS-J, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and a two-point discrimination threshold (TPD) on the middle finger. We investigated the internal consistency of BPDS-J and the correlation between BPDS-J and clinical outcomes as a concurrent validity measure. BPDS-J had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73) and was significantly correlated with the TPD ratio (r = 0.65, adjusted p = 0.01) and TSK (r = 0.51, adjusted p = 0.04). BPDS-J has good internal consistency and concurrent validity for assessing body perception disturbance in Japanese patients with CRPS. Disturbed body perception may be worth evaluating when managing patients with CRPS using BPDS.

Disputing space-based biases in unilateral complex regional pain syndrome

There is some evidence that people with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) show reduced attention to the affected relative to unaffected limb and its surrounding space, resembling hemispatial neglect after brain injury. These neuropsychological symptoms could be related to central mechanisms of pathological pain and contribute to its clinical manifestation. However, the existing evidence of changes in spatial cognition is limited and often inconsistent. We examined visuospatial attention, the mental representation of space, and spatially-defined motor function in 54 people with unilateral upper-limb CRPS and 22 pain-free controls. Contrary to our hypotheses and previous evidence, individuals with CRPS did not show any systematic spatial biases in visuospatial attention to or representation of the side of space corresponding to their affected limb (relative to the unaffected side). We found very little evidence of directional slowing of movements towards the affected relative to unaffected side that would be consistent with motor neglect. People with CRPS were, however, slower than controls to initiate and execute movements with both their affected and unaffected hands, which suggests disrupted central motor networks. Finally, we found no evidence of any clinical relevance of changes in spatial cognition because there were no relationships between the magnitude of spatial biases and the severity of pain or other CRPS symptoms. The results did reveal potential relationships between CRPS pain and symptom severity, subjective body perception disturbance, and extent of motor impairment, which would support treatments focused on normalizing body representation and improving motor function. Our findings suggest that previously reported spatial biases in CRPS might have been overstated.