Aqueous proton-based batteries (APBs) as a good choice to respond battery diversity, delivering safety, cost, environmental friendliness and high-power necessary for renewable energy storage.1 However, most promising conventional aqueous battery anodes have relatively poor compatibility in acid. The limited existing anode options like Pb and MoO3 can hardly match the high-performance of advanced cathodes, leading low-voltage and unsatisfactory energy density of APBs.2-4 Therefore, the exploration of high-performance anode materials is thus of critical issue for the APB assembling.Sn metal should be one of the most suitable APB anode choices due to its relatively high hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) overpotential, large theoretical capacity (451.6 mAh g−1) and negative redox potential (−0.14 V vs. SHE). With a body-centered tetragonal crystal structure and similar facet surface energy, Sn metal deposit in polyhedral morphology isotropically. This may cause serious “dead Sn” issue when deposition capacity increases because large Sn particle has limited contact with the substrate and easily to shed from the electrode, resulting in low Coulombic efficiency and short lifespan.We will present our efforts of developing Sn anode with high capacity and long lifespan by an interfacial alloying regulation approach. Smaller grain size and more uniform Sn deposition can be achieved by higher propensity for nucleation and Sn migration energy barrier. Extra interfacial interaction suppresses shedding of Sn polyhedron particles, thus prohibiting the formation of “dead” Sn. Based on the optimized Sn metal anode, we propose several promising designs for APBs, with high performance such as high output voltages, good specific energy densities, fast kinetics, and long life. References X. Wu, J. J. Hong, W. Shin, L. Ma, T. Liu, X. Bi, Y. Yuan, Y. Qi, T. W. Surta, W. Huang, J. Neuefeind, T. Wu, P. A. Greaney, J. Lu, X. Ji. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 123-130.W. Chen, G. Li, A. Pei, Y. Li, L. Liao, H. Wang, J. Wan, Z. Liang, G. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Cui. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 428-435.Y. Liang, Y. Jing, S. Gheytani, K. Y. Lee, P. Liu, A. Facchetti, Y. Yao. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 841-848.X. Wang, Y. Xie, K. Tang, C. Wang, C. Yan. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11569-11573.
Read full abstract