ABSTRACT This study explains the impact of vertical interlocking on national (NSO) and provincial/territorial (P/TSOs) non-profit sport organization board decision making in a federated sport model. Data were collected from six boards in Canada (two NSOs, four P/TSOs) via 36 meeting observations, 18 semi-structured interviews, and over 900 documents. Sixty-six decisions were categorized based on vertically interlocked and non-interlocked boards (three per group). Data were analyzed via an independent sample t-test (derived from a structured observation sheet to score decisions quantitatively) and a codebook thematic analysis. Results demonstrated interlocked boards differed from their non-interlocked counterparts when making decisions regarding the length, delays, interactions, and information sources (i.e., acquisition and use). Theoretically, results provide insights into vertical interlocking’s multi-dimensional impact on decision-making constructs. Practically, NSO and P/TSO boards should perceive vertical interlocking positively, given the ability to access and use information sources not available in non-interlocked boards.
Read full abstract