Blunt Traumatic Diaphragmatic Rupture Research Articles

Traumatic diaphragm rupture treated with left anterolateral thoracotomy approach: a case report

Background: Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is a life-threatening condition due to the herniation of abdominal organs into pleural cavities. Rupture can occur in patients with major blunt or penetration trauma of the lower chest. Blunt TDR is usually caused by momentary high energy damage and is associated with severe trauma. This study aims to evaluate our hospital's experience with managing patients with blunt TDR, including its incidence, modes of diagnosis, operative treatments, postoperative outcomes, and factors predictive of patient outcomes. Case Report: A 44 years old man was referred to our hospital complaining of dyspnea. Eleven hours before his admission, he was riding his motorcycle, fell to the road, and hit the tree on his left chest. After the accident, he feels dyspnea, chest pain, and abdominal pain. The patient was brought to the nearest hospital and underwent a chest x-ray and left chest tube insertion, with initial production was blood 1700 ml. On examination, there was an increased respiratory rate, a visible bruise of the posteroinferior left chest near the left flank and a pre-installed chest tube thoracostomy on the left chest. Chest x-ray showed an intrathoracic herniation of abdominal viscera, the "collar sign" appeared, and the abdomen x-ray showed the left upper quadrant abdominal organ displaced into the left thorax cavity. Thus suspected, the underlying condition of TDR in this patient. We decided to perform left anterolateral thoracotomy and continued with laparotomy and splenectomy Conclusion: TDR is a rare case. The trauma may include shearing a stretched diaphragm, avulsion from a muscular insertion point, or increased abdominal pressure exceeding the bursting pressure of the diaphragm. Intra-abdominal organ injuries are more common than intrathoracic injuries. Initial operative approaches were laparotomy and thoracotomy.

Factors Associated with Traumatic Diaphragmatic Rupture among Patients with Chest or Abdominal Injury: A Nationwide Study from Japan.

Background: Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is a rare condition that is seen in patients with blunt thoracoabdominal trauma. However, factors that are associated with blunt TDR have not been fully revealed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors that are associated with blunt TDR in trauma patients with a chest or abdominal injury using nationwide trauma registry data in Japan. Method: This study was a retrospective observational study with a 15-year study period from 2004 to 2018. We included trauma patients with a chest or abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score of two or more. We evaluated the relationship between confounding factors such as mechanism of injury and blunt TDR with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: This study included 65,110 patients, of whom 496 patients (0.8%) suffered blunt TDR. Factors that were associated with blunt TDR were disturbance of consciousness (adjusted OR [AOR]: 1.639, 95% CI: 1.326–2.026), FAST positive (AOR: 2.120, 95% CI: 1.751–2.567), front seat passenger (AOR: 1.748, 95% CI: 1.129–2.706), and compression injury by heavy object (AOR: 1.677, 95% CI: 1.017–2.765). Conclusion: This study revealed several factors that are associated with blunt TDR. The results of this study may be useful for clinicians when estimating blunt TDR.

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: Single-center experience with 38 patients.

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (BTDR) is uncommon, but is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to present our experience with management of this injury. Medical records of 38 patients with BTDR who were treated in our hospital from January 2001 to June 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The sex, age, cause of injury, location of rupture, mode of diagnosis, time to diagnosis, the presence of herniation and bowel perforation, the presence of preoperative shock and intubation, Injury Severity Score (ISS), associated injuries, comorbidity, the operative procedure, morbidity and mortality, and the predictive factors affecting the outcome of BTDR were evaluated. There were 32 men (84.2%) and 6 women (15.8%) with a mean age of 51.2 years (range 18–84 years). The diagnosis could be preoperatively established in 28 patients (73.7%) with a plain chest X-ray or computed tomography scan. Rupture of diaphragm was left-sided in 31 patients (81.6%), right-sided in 6 (15.8%), and bilateral in 1 (2.6%). Sixteen patients had preoperative shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, heart rate >120/min). Initial operative approaches were laparotomy in 22 patients (57.9%) and thoracotomy in 16 (42.1%). Eleven required additional exploration. The rate of additional exploration was higher in patients who initially underwent thoracotomy than laparotomy (56.2% vs 9.1%, P = .003). Patients who underwent additional exploration had a significantly longer operation time (330 minutes vs 237.5 minutes, P = .012), and a significantly higher morbidity rate (72.7% vs 22.2%, P =.008). Overall mortality was observed in 6 patients (15.8%). The mortality was associated with right-sided TDR (P = .042) and preoperative shock (P = .003). Neither ISS nor delay in diagnosis posed a statistically significant risk to the outcome of patients. Intra-abdominal organ injuries are more common than intrathoracic injuries in patients with BTDR, indicating that laparotomy should be the initial approach in these patients. Preoperative shock and right-sided TDR are predictive of mortality after BTDR.

Delayed presentation of post traumatic diaphragmatic hernia

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture is an uncommon but severe problem that is usually seen in polytraumatized patients including blunt abdomino-thoracic trauma due to road traffic accidents, fall from height and penetrating injuries. Regardless of the mechanism, diagnosis is often missed and high index of suspicion is vital. Late presentations are associated with increased morbidity. We report an interesting case of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic hernia in a 32-year-old man presenting 4 years after the initial abdomino-thoracic injury due to fall from height. He had herniation of the spleen and stomach. Through a left sub costal incision, the herniated organs were reduced and diaphragmatic defect closed with interrupted prolene suture.

Blunt diaphragmatic rupture - a rare but challenging entity in thoracoabdominal trauma

PurposeDelayed diagnosis of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (BDR) is not uncommon in the emergency department (ED) despite improvement in investigative techniques. We reviewed a large case series of patients diagnosed with blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture in order to report demographics, clinical features, and mechanisms of injury of this important but challenging entity. MethodsFrom January 2001 through December 2009, 43 patients were diagnosed with BDR at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Demographic data, including sex, age, initial hemodynamic parameters, laboratory data, diagnostic imaging, trauma mechanism, injury location, associated injuries, injury severity score (ISS), time to diagnosis, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (hospital LOS), and mortality, were extracted from hospital records. ResultsA total of 43 patients (34 men; 9 women) with BDR were analyzed. Their median age was 37 years (15-82 yrs). Most of these injuries were related to traffic collision (76.8%). The anatomic location of injury to the diaphragm consisted of 24 left-sided (55.8%), 14 right-sided (32.6%),and 5 bilateral diaphragmatic injuries. (11.6%) Hemopneumothorax was the most common associated injury (37.2%). The median diagnostic time was 8 hours (range 2 to 366 hrs). The median ISS score was 18 (range 9 to 41). The median ICU LOS was 4 days (range 0 to 99 ds) and the median HLOS was 19 days (range 1 to 106ds). The total mortality rate was 9.3%. Initial high ISS, initial shock and bilateral diaphragmatic injury significantly increased mortality. ConclusionBDR constitutes a rare entity in thoracoabdominal trauma and most of these injuries were related to traffic collision. High index of suspicion was still the main factor to early diagnosis of this case. The mortality was related to initial shock , bilateral BDR and high ISS. Proper initial resuscitation and correction of other serious injuries may be more life-saving in patients with BDR.

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: tertiary centre experience

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia (TDH) resulting from traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) may not be easily detected and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A retrospective case note analysis was performed of all patients treated for TDR at a major teaching hospital between March 2003 and March 2008. The aetiological factors, associated injuries, management and outcome were analysed. Twenty-seven patients were studied (24 males, 3 females) and their ages ranged from 16 to 72 years (median 35 years). TDR was left-sided in 85% and right-sided in 15%. Aetiology was blunt trauma in 81% and 19% had penetrating injury. Associated injuries were present in 81%. The most common approach for repair was transabdominal (89%); additional thoracotomy was needed in 11%. Herniation of abdominal contents was present in 85% and herniation of more than one organ was present in 57%. The diaphragmatic rent was repaired primarily in 89% using nonabsorbable sutures. Post-operative pulmonary complications occurred in 52% of patients. Three patients (11%) died. Left-sided blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture was more common than right-sided rupture. The most commonly herniated organs were the stomach and colon. Most ruptures could be repaired by an abdominal approach, which also allowed a complete exploration of the abdominal organs. Careful attention should be given to associated intra-abdominal injuries. Most of the defects were repaired directly using nonabsorbable sutures.

The dangling diaphragm sign: sensitivity and comparison with existing CT signs of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture

The objectives of our study were to describe a new CT sign of diaphragmatic injury, the "dangling diaphragm" sign, and assess its comparative utility relative to other signs in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury resulting from blunt trauma. CT scans of 16 blunt trauma patients (12 men and four women, mean age 36.6 years old) with surgically proven diaphragmatic injury and 32 blunt trauma patients (24 men and eight women; mean age 37.4 years old) without evidence of diaphragmatic injury at surgery were blindly reviewed by three board certified radiologists specializing in body imaging. Studies were evaluated for the presence of established signs of diaphragmatic injury, as well as the dangling diaphragm sign, in which the free edge of the torn hemidiaphragm curls inward from its normal course parallel to the body wall. The sensitivity and specificity of each sign were determined, as were the correlation between the signs and the interobserver agreement in evaluation of these findings. The radiologists' overall impression as to whether rupture was present was also recorded. In select cases, coronal and/or sagittal reformatted images were available, and they were reviewed following evaluation of the original axial images. Any change in interpretation due to these images was noted. The sensitivity of the radiologists' overall impression for detection of diaphragmatic injury was 77%, with 98% specificity. Individual signs of diaphragmatic injury had sensitivities ranging from 44% to 69%, with specificities of 98% to 100%. The dangling diaphragm sign had a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 98%, similar to the other signs. Multiple signs were present in most cases of diaphragmatic injury, and coronal and sagittal reformatted images had little impact. Diaphragmatic injury remains a challenging radiographic diagnosis. The dangling diaphragm is a conspicuous sign of diaphragmatic injury, and awareness of it may increase detection of diaphragmatic injury on CT studies.

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: a retrospective observational study of 46 patients

A retrospective study aimed to analyze our experience in 46 patients with blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (BTDR) admitted to our tertiary hospital from 1995 to 2007. Charts, chest roentgenograms (CXR), and computed tomography (CT) scans were carefully reviewed. The mean age was 36.5+/-10.1 years, 36 (78.3%) were males. The etiology was a traffic accident in 36 (78.3%) patients. BTDR was left-sided in 34 (73.9%) and right-sided in 12 (26.1%) patients. CXR was diagnostic in 26 (56.5%) and CT in 12 (26.1%) patients. Associated injuries included lung 12 (26.1%), liver 10 (21.7%), spleen 24 (52.2%) and bowel 2 (4.2%) patients. BTDR was approached through thoracotomy 26 (56.5%), laparotomy 16 (34.8%), and combined approach 4 (8.7%) patients. The repair was primarily with interrupted non-absorbable sutures in 42 (91.3%) and by prosthetic mesh in four patients. Complications developed in 20 patients. Mortality was observed in 2 (4.3%) patients. We concluded that BTDR is a common lesion in young adult males on the left side caused by a traffic accident. A high index of suspicion combined with repeated and selective radiologic evaluation is necessary for early diagnosis. Associated injuries represent the main prognostic factor affecting morbidity and mortality. Thoracotomy and primary repair is adequate surgical treatment.

‘Pseudopneumothorax’—Hold that chest tube!

We report a case of herniation of abdominal contents into the left hemithorax in a patient with a history of vague left-sided thoracoabdominal trauma 18 days previous to admission and who also had a recent 1-week history of upper respiratory symptoms, including cough, and then presented with dyspnoea and fever for 3 days. There was no preceding cardiorespiratory pathology of note. We also discuss the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of blunt-traumatic diaphragmatic rupture.

Delayed presentation of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: A case report

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture is an uncommon but severe problem that is usually seen in poly-traumatized patients. Diagnosis is often difficult resulting in delayed presentation and increased morbidity. We report a case of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic hernia in a 39-year-old man presenting 10 years after the initial abdomino-thoracic injury sustained in a road traffic accident. He had herniation of the spleen and stomach. Through a left thoracotomy, the herniated organs were reduced and diaphragmatic defect closed with interrupted nylon sutures. A high index of suspicion would minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with delayed diagnosis. Keywords : trauma, diaphragmatic hernia, delayed presentation Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research Vol. 7(3&4) 2005: 323-324

The unreliability of CT scans and initial chest radiographs in evaluating blunt trauma induced diaphragmatic rupture

There is no gold standard for early and reliable diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR). The purpose of this study is to correlate CT scans, chest radiographs, and intubation on the ability to diagnosis traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. Twenty patients with blunt trauma induced diaphragmatic rupture were identified from a five year review of a Level 1 Trauma Registry. Ten of the 20 (50%) patients had TDR on initial chest X-ray, all on the left side. Twelve patients had both chest X-rays and a chest and abdominal CT scan; however, only five (42%) of the CT scans were diagnostic. Of the 12 patients initially intubated, TDR was diagnosed in only four (33%) patients on initial chest X-ray and in one (14%) of seven patients having chest and abdominal CT scans and being intubated. The early diagnosis of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture, especially in intubated patients, continues to be a diagnostic dilemma. There is a significantly better possibility of identifying left over right-sided TDR (P < or = 0.05). Diagnosing TDR is also facilitated by extubation. If the suspicion exists, a post extubation chest radiograph should be performed to evaluate for TDR.

A comparison of right and left blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: Boulanger BR, Milzman DP, Rosate C, et al J Trauma 35:255–260 Aug 1993

A comparison of right and left blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: Boulanger BR, Milzman DP, Rosate C, et al J Trauma 35:255–260 Aug 1993