Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Research Articles

Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries.

Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries.

Atlanto-occipital Dissociation: A Review on Epidemiology, Recognition and Diagnosis, Management Options, Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Atlanto-occipital dissociation (AOD) is an extremely common injury but often fatal. In a systematic review from 2010, AODs were present in almost 20% of blunt trauma fatalities. It is an injury many patients do not survive; therefore, few are treated, even at high volume trauma centers. In survivors, his injury is often missed or the diagnosis is often delayed. Mortality rates commonly reach beyond 60% when injury patterns go unrecognized. Approximately 50% of patients with AOD sustain blunt cerebrovascular injury and nearly 20% of patients present with traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke. This pathology was once considered uniformly fatal. However, over the last 20 years, significant advancements have been made both clinically and radiographically, to better identify and manage this injury pattern. Despite improvements in clinical comprehension and improved time to diagnosis, less than 75% of cases are currently recognized within 24 hours. Less than 40% of patients who suffer AOD are independent with functionality, without neurological impairment. This article reviews current literature regarding AOD in hopes to improve timing to diagnosis, subsequent prognosis, timing to fixation or stabilization, and postoperative recovery.

Clinical outcomes among patients with concurrent blunt cerebrovascular injury and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

BackgroundBlunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) accounts for 1–3 % of patients with blunt trauma, which should be promptly diagnosed and managed due to risk of cerebral infarction and death. Antithrombotic therapy had been proven to reduce risk of stroke and mortality. However, due to concern of hematoma progression, treatment suggestion is still inconclusive for patients with concurrent traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective, observational study from 2002 to 2020 at a Level I trauma center, all patients with BCVI and concurrent traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were recruited. Patients' demographics, initial CT findings, severity of BCVI, treatment and outcomes were documented and analyzed to define possible risk factors of death and stroke. ResultsAmong all 57 patients, 49 (86.0 %) patients had injury at ICA, 6 (10.5 %) had VA injury, and 2 (3.5 %) suffered from both. Targeted treatments for BCVI were provided to 33 (57.9 %) patient, mostly endovascular intervention (78.8 %), antithrombotic treatment was given to 11 (19.3 %) patients. At 3-month follow-up, 17 (29.8 %) patients expired, and 18 (31.6 %) patients had cerebral infarction due to BCVI. We identified more severe initial CT findings (p = 0.016), higher head Abbreviated Injury Scale (p = 0.049) and initial life-threatening events (p = 0.047) as risk factors of death, and traumatic basal cistern subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH) (p = 0.040) as single risk factor of cerebral infarction. ConclusionsAround one-thirds of patients with concurrent BCVI and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were death or suffered from cerebral infarction within 3 months, with severity of initial head injury and SAH at basal cistern as risk factors, respectively.

Diagnosis and management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries: What you need to know.

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are not as rare as they were once thought to be-but they still have the same potential for disastrous outcomes. They may occur following any trauma, but more common with higher energy transfer mechanisms. If stroke occurs, prompt recognition and treatment offers the best chance for optimal outcome. Early diagnosis and provision of antithrombotic therapy may prevent strokes, so screening of asymptomatic patients is recommended. Herein we will present what you need to know to diagnose and manage blunt cerebrovascular injury.

The prevalence of complicated cervical injuries in near-hanging patients without abnormal levels of consciousness or neck signs

BackgroundCervical injuries are important complications of near-hanging, which is defined as self-injury by hanging if the patient survives at admission. Previous studies have reported that complicated cervical injuries due to near-hanging are uncommon. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether cervical imaging can be safely omitted for near-hanging patients who are alert and have no abnormal neck symptoms or signs. MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study to investigate the prevalence of cervical injuries among hospitalized near-hanging patients between April 2014 and June 2023. The primary outcome was the prevalence of any complicated cervical injuries, which included laryngeal fractures, laryngeal deviations, spinal cord injuries, cervical spine fractures, and blunt cerebrovascular injuries. The primary aim of this study was to determine the primary outcome among near-hanging patients with normal levels of consciousness and no abnormal neck symptoms or signs. ResultsDuring the study period, a total of 63 near-hanging patients were hospitalized. Of these, 11 patients (18%) with normal levels of consciousness and no neck symptoms or signs at admission were included. The median age of the patients was 37 years (IQR 27 to 53); 5 (45%) were women, and none had cardiac arrest at the scene. For the primary outcome, no complicated cervical injuries (0%; 95% CI, 0% to 27%) occurred among the small number of near-hanging patients who had normal levels of consciousness and no abnormal neck symptoms or signs at admission. ConclusionsThere were no cases of complicated cervical injuries among near-hanging patients with normal levels of consciousness and no abnormal neck symptoms or signs. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted to investigate whether cervical imaging can be safely omitted in assessments of these patients.

Analyzing computed tomography Modalities for screening pediatric patients for traumatic blunt cerebrovascular injury

BackgroundOptimal screening for BCVI in pediatric trauma patients remains debated. We hypothesized screening with CTAN would decrease the number of duplicate CT scans per patient and increase BCVI detection rate. MethodsLocal BCVI screening institutional protocol changed May 2022 to include Computed Tomography angiography neck (CTAN). We performed a retrospective review of pediatric blunt trauma patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023. Patients before and after implementation of universal screening were compared for demographic, clinical, radiographic, and outcome data. ResultsSix-hundred-eight patients were included with 368 before and 240 after the protocol change. Screening with CTAN decreased the number of duplicate neck scans (5.7%vs.2.1 ​%,p ​= ​0.03) and increased BCVI detection rate (0.27%v.2.5 ​%,p ​= ​0.01). Of the seven patients diagnosed with BCVI 2019–2023, no patients suffered any stroke-related morbidity. ConclusionUniversal screening for BCVI in pediatric patients with CTAN resulted in fewer scans and an increased BCVI detection rate.

Traumatic Cervical Cerebrovascular Injury and the Role of CTA: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Traumatic cerebrovascular injury (CVI) involving the cervical carotid and vertebral arteries is rare but can lead to stroke, hemodynamic compromise, and mortality in the absence of early diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis of both blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) and penetrating CVI is based on cerebrovascular imaging. The most commonly used screening criteria for BCVI include the expanded Denver criteria and the Memphis criteria, each providing varying thresholds for subsequent imaging. Neck CTA has supplanted catheter-based digital subtraction angiography as the preferred screening modality for CVI in patients with trauma. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the current state of CTA-based cervical imaging in trauma. We review the most common screening criteria for BCVI, discuss BCVI grading scales that are based on neck CTA, describe the diagnostic performance of CTA in the context of other imaging modalities and evolving treatment strategies, and provide a practical guide for neck CTA implementation.

ISCHEMIC STROKE SECONDARY DUE TO BLUNT CAROTID ARTERY INJURY A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Ischemic stroke secondary due to blunt cerebrovascular injury is a rare complication, with high morbidities, severity neurological outcome. However, we do not pay enough attention to the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to blunt cerebrovascular injury. We report a typical case of acute ischemic stroke due to blunt cerebrovascular injury. Unfortunately, this patient did not receive timelineless emergency and treatment, suffered from severe neurological deficit. These patients suffered from blunt cerebrovascular injury required to be careful screening, prompt diagnosis, and aggressive treatment with therapies such as anticoagulants, endovascular intervention, and surgery to reduce mortality and severe neurological deficit.

The effect of circle of willis anatomy and scanning practices on outcomes for blunt cerebrovascular injuries

BackgroundLimited research has explored the effect of Circle of Willis (CoW) anatomy among blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) on outcomes. It remains unclear if current BCVI screening and scanning practices are sufficient in identification of concomitant COW anomalies and how they affect outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included adult traumatic BCVIs at 17 level I-IV trauma centers (08/01/2017-07/31/2021). The objectives were to compare screening criteria, scanning practices, and outcomes among those with and without COW anomalies.ResultsOf 561 BCVIs, 65% were male and the median age was 48 y/o. 17% (n = 93) had a CoW anomaly. Compared to those with normal CoW anatomy, those with CoW anomalies had significantly higher rates of any strokes (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.04), ICHs (38% vs. 21%, p = 0.001), and clinically significant bleed (CSB) before antithrombotic initiation (14% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001), respectively. Compared to patients with a normal CoW, those with a CoW anomaly also had ischemic strokes more often after antithrombotic interruption (13% vs. 2%, p = 0.02).Patients with CoW anomalies were screened significantly more often because of some other head/neck indication not outlined in BCVI screening criteria than patients with normal CoW anatomy (27% vs. 18%, p = 0.04), respectively. Scans identifying CoW anomalies included both the head and neck significantly more often (53% vs. 29%, p = 0.0001) than scans identifying normal CoW anatomy, respectively.ConclusionsWhile previous studies suggested universal scanning for BCVI detection, this study found patients with BCVI and CoW anomalies had some other head/neck injury not identified as BCVI scanning criteria significantly more than patients with normal CoW which may suggest that BCVI screening across all patients with a head/neck injury may improve the simultaneous detection of CoW and BCVIs. When screening for BCVI, scans including both the head and neck are superior to a single region in detection of concomitant CoW anomalies. Worsened outcomes (strokes, ICH, and clinically significant bleeding before antithrombotic initiation) were observed for patients with CoW anomalies when compared to those with a normal CoW. Those with a CoW anomaly experienced strokes at a higher rate than patients with normal CoW anatomy specifically when antithrombotic therapy was interrupted. This emphasizes the need for stringent antithrombotic therapy regimens among patients with CoW anomalies and may suggest that patients CoW anomalies would benefit from more varying treatment, highlighting the need to include the CoW anatomy when scanning for BCVI.Level of EvidenceLevel III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

Traumatic carotid artery dissection in polytrauma: is conservative treatment an adequate strategy? A case report

We present the case of a 24-year-old man, involved in a car accident, with a traumatic right carotid artery dissection Grade II Blunt CerebroVascular Injury (BCVI) according to the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). The patient arrived at our hospital without neurological symptoms and was then admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for neurological monitoring; antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy was initiated and in line with current literature, no routine endovascular treatment was performed. Twenty-four hours post-trauma, the patient required an urgent abdominal surgical intervention under general anesthesia. Upon awakening, he presented with left hemiplegia. The CT scan revealed hypodensity in the front-insular region prompting an urgent endovascular procedure. Fourteen days post trauma the patient was discharged from the Stroke Unit with an unchanged neurological performance, despite receiving appropriate treatment for Grade II BCVI, as recommended in current literature. Our patient developed a severe neurological disability. Further discussions are needed.

Acute and Long-Term Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury at a Quaternary Referral Level 1 Trauma Center: The Memphis Experience and Comparison of a New Scoring System.

The management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) remains an important topic within trauma and neurosurgery today. There remains a lack of consensus within the literature and significant variation across institutions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate management of BCVI at a large, tertiary referral trauma center. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to conduct a retrospective review of patients with BCVI at our Level 1 Trauma Center. Computed tomography angiography was used to identify BCVI for each patient. Patient information was collected, and statistical analysis was performed. With the included risk factors for ischemic complications, a novel scoring system based on ischemic risk, the "Memphis Score," was developed and evaluated to grade BCVI. Two hundred seventeen patients with BCVI from July 2020 to August 2022 were identified. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (141, 65.0%). Vertebral arteries were the most common vessel injured (136, 51.1%) with most injuries occurring at a high cervical location (101, 38.0%). Denver Grade 1 injuries (89, 33.5%) and a Memphis Score of 1 were most frequent (172, 64.6%), and initial anticoagulation with heparin drip was initiated 56.7% of the time (123). Endovascular treatment was required in 24 patients (11.1%) and was usually performed in the first 48 hours (15, 62.5%). While Denver Grade (P = .019) and Memphis Score (P < .00001) were significantly higher in those patients undergoing endovascular treatment, only the Memphis Score demonstrated a significant difference between those patients who had stroke or worsening on follow-up imaging and those who did not (P = .0009). Although BCVI management has improved since early investigative efforts, institutions must evaluate and share their data to help clarify outcomes. The novel "Memphis Score" presents a standardized framework to communicate ischemic risk and guide management of BCVI.

The role of number of affected vessels on radiologic and clinical outcomes of patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury

ObjectiveThere is a lack of data on the role of characteristics of injured vessels on the outcomes of patients with blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the number (single vs multiple) of injured vessels on outcomes. MethodsThis is a retrospective study at two American College of Surgeons Level I trauma centers (2017-2021). Adult (>16 years) trauma patients with BCVIs are included. Injuries were graded by the Denver Scale based on the initial computed tomography angiography (CTA). Early repeat CTA was performed 7 to 10 days after diagnosis. Patients were stratified by the number (single vs multiple) of the involved vessels. Outcomes included progression of BCVIs on repeat CTA, stroke, and in-hospital mortality attributable to BCVIs. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the association between the number of injured vessels and outcomes. ResultsA total of 491 patients with 591 injured vessels (285 carotid and 306 vertebral arteries) were identified. Sixty percent were male, the mean age was 44 years, and the median Injury Severity Score was 18 (interquartile range, 11-25). Overall, 18% had multiple-vessel injuries, 16% had bilateral vessel injuries, and 3% had multiple injuries on the same side. The overall rates of progression to higher-grade injuries, stroke, and mortality were 23%, 7.7%, and 8.8%, respectively. On uni- and multivariable analyses, multiple BCVIs were associated with progression to higher-grade injuries on repeat imaging, stroke, and mortality compared with single-vessel injuries. ConclusionsBCVIs with multiple injured vessels are more likely to progress to higher grades on repeat CTA, with multiple injuries independently associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with those with single injuries. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating the number of injured vessels in clinical decision-making and in defining protocols for repeat imaging.

434 Concurrent Vascular and Traumatic Brain Injury: Effect on Patient Outcomes

INTRODUCTION: Dural venous sinus thrombosis (DVST) in select populations following traumatic brain injury (TBI), including those with blunt mechanism or depressed skull fractures, have been associated with an increased risk of mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of data from our institutional trauma registry from 2004-2021. Patients were divided into three groups: those with imaging confirmed DVST, those with imaging confirmed DVST and blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI), and a control group of TBI patients with cerebrovascular imaging without DVST or BCVI. All age groups and injury mechanisms were included with a head abbreviated injury score (AIS) of = 3. Demographics, injury characteristics, and patient outcomes were collected. Between group differences were compared with non-parametric tests as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify predictors of inpatient mortality. RESULTS: We identified 9,875 patients over the time-period with TBIs, with a 1.64% incidence of DVST and 23.4% incidence of concurrent BCVI. Despite a more severe presenting injury profile in those with DVST, the presence of DVST itself was not significantly associated with inpatient mortality (OR 1.02; 0.26-3.69). On regression analysis an occlusive DVST (OR 1.34; 1.15-1.56) and not receiving treatment (OR 1.27; 1.01-1.60) were independently associated with inpatient mortality. Significantly worse functional outcomes were observed in those with DVST+BCVI at 6-months, though a high proportion of patients achieved a GOSE of 7 or 8. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an incidence of traumatic DVST of 1.64% in a mixed population of head injured patients, with 23.4% of patients having concurrent BCVI. The presence of DVST alone was not significantly associated with inpatient mortality.

Stroke Prevention in Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Role of Aspirin 81 mg

The stroke rate in blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) varies from 25% without treatment to less than 8% with antithrombotic therapy. There is no consensus on the optimal management to prevent stroke BCVI. We investigated the efficacy and safety of oral Aspirin (ASA) 81mg to prevent BCVI-related stroke compared to historically reported stroke rates with ASA 325mg and heparin. A single-center retrospective study included adult trauma patients who received oral ASA 81mg for BCVI management between 2013 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and injury characteristics, imaging findings, treatment-related complications, and outcomes. Eighty-four patients treated with ASA 81mg for BCVI were identified. The mean age was 41.50years, and 61.9% were male. The mean Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale were 19.82 and 12.12, respectively. A total of 101 vessel injuries were identified, including vertebral artery injuries in 56.4% and carotid artery injuries in 44.6%. Traumatic brain injury was found in 42.9%, and 16.7% of patients had a solid organ injur. Biffl grade I (52.4%) injury was the most common, followed by grade II (37.6%) and grade III (4.9%). ASA 81mg was started in the first 24hours in 67.9% of patients, including 20 patients with traumatic brain injury and 8 with solid organ injuries. BCVI-related stroke occurred in 3 (3.5%) patients with Biffl grade II (n=2) and III (n=1). ASA-related complications were not identified in any patient. The mean length of stay in the hospital was 10.94days, and 8 patients died during hospitalization due to complications of polytrauma. Follow-up with computed tomography angiography was performed in 8 (9.5%) patients, which showed improvement in 5 and a stable lesion in 3 at a mean time of 58days after discharge. In the absence of clear guidelines regarding appropriate medication, BCVI management should be individualized case-by-case through a multidisciplinary approach. ASA 81mg is a viable option for BCVI-related stroke prevention compared to the reported stroke rates (2%-8%) with commonly used antithrombotics like heparin and ASA 325mg. Future prospective studies are needed to provide insight into the safety and efficacy of the current commonly used agent in managing BCVI.

Risk Factors for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in a Cohort of Pediatric Patients With Cervical Seat Belt Sign.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BVCI), injury to the carotid or vertebral arteries, may result from forces involving seatbelts. Although previous studies have not found a seat belt sign to be a significant predictor for BCVI, it is still used to screen patients for BCVI. This study aims to determine risk factors for BCVI within a cohort of patients with seat belt signs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using our institutional trauma registry and included patients younger than 18 years with blunt trauma who both had a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the neck performed and had evidence of a seat belt sign per the medical record. We reported frequencies, proportions, and measures of central tendency and conducted univariate analysis to evaluate factors associated with BCVI. We estimated the magnitude of the effect of each variable associated with the study outcome by conducting logistic regression and reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Among all study patients, BCVI injuries were associated with Injury Severity Score higher than 15 ( P = 0.04), cervical spinal fractures ( P = 0.007), or basilar skull fractures ( P = 0.01). We observed higher proportions of children with BCVI when other motorized and other blunt mechanisms were reported as the mechanisms of injury ( P = 0.002) versus motor vehicle collision. Significant risk factors for BCVI in the presence of seat belt sign are: Injury severity score greater than 15, cervical spinal fracture, basilar skull fracture, and the other motorized mechanism of injury, similar to those in all children at risk of BCVI.

Early Pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury and TBI: Is it Safe and Effective? An EAST Multicenter Study.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) with concurrent traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents increased risk of both ischemic stroke and bleeding. This study investigated the safety and survival benefit of BCVI treatment (antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy) in this population. We hypothesized that treatment would be associated with fewer and later strokes in patients with BCVI and TBI without increasing bleeding complications. Patients with head AIS >0 were selected from a database of BCVI patients previously obtained for an observational trial. A Kaplan-Meier analysis compared stroke survival in patients who received BCVI treatment to those who did not. Logistic regression was used to evaluate for confounding variables. Of 488 patients, 347 (71.1%) received BCVI treatment and 141 (28.9%) did not. BCVI treatment was given at a median of 31h post-admission. BCVI treatment was associated with lower stroke rate (4.9% vs 24.1%, P < .001 and longer stroke-free survival (P < .001), but also less severe systemic injury. Logistic regression identified motor GCS and BCVI treatment as the only predictors of stroke. No patients experienced worsening TBI because of treatment. Patients with BCVI and TBI who did not receive BCVI treatment had an increased rate of stroke early in their hospital stay, though this effect may be confounded by worse motor deficits and systemic injuries. BCVI treatment within 2-3days of admission may be safe for patients with mean head AIS of 2.6. Future prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings and determine optimal timing of BCVI treatment in TBI patients with BCVI.

Prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following blunt cerebrovascular injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background & objectivesBlunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) includes carotid and/or vertebral artery injury following trauma, and conveys an increased stroke risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive summary of prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following BCVI. MethodsWe searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from January 1946 to June 2023. We identified studies reporting associations between patient or injury factors and risk of stroke following BCVI. We performed meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) using the random effects method and assessed individual study risk of bias using the QUIPS tool. We separately pooled adjusted and unadjusted analyses, highlighting the estimate with the higher certainty. ResultsWe included 26 cohort studies, involving 20,458 patients with blunt trauma. The overall incidence of stroke following BCVI was 7.7 %. Studies were predominantly retrospective cohorts from North America and included both carotid and vertebral artery injuries. Diagnosis of BCVI was most commonly confirmed with CT angiography. We demonstrated with moderate to high certainty that factors associated with increased risk of stroke included carotid artery injury (as compared to vertebral artery injury, unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] 1.94, 95 % CI 1.62 to 2.32), Grade III Injury (as compared to grade I or II) (uOR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.88 to 3.20), Grade IV injury (uOR 3.09, 95 % CI 2.20 to 4.35), polyarterial injury (uOR 3.11 (95 % CI 2.05 to 4.72), occurrence of hypotension at the time of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.32, 95 % CI 0.87 to 2.03) and higher total body injury severity (aOR 5.91, 95 % CI 1.90 to 18.39). ConclusionLocal anatomical injury pattern, overall burden of injury and flow dynamics contribute to BCVI-related stroke risk. These findings provide the foundational evidence base for risk stratification to support clinical decision making and further research.

Isolated celiac artery injury: Brief report, review of literature, and suggested grading guidelines

Blunt traumatic dissection of the celiac artery without aortic dissection is a rare event. There is paucity of data on the appropriate management of such injuries. In this brief report, we present a patient with isolated celiac artery dissection after blunt abdominal trauma. The patient was managed non-operatively with anticoagulation and developed splenic infarct. Due to its rarity, no grading criteria and management guidelines exist for the spectrum of isolated blunt CA injuries. Furthermore, it remains unlikely that injury volume will increase to create robust management guidelines. We therefore suggest that isolated celiac artery injury be graded based on the Biffl grading criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury and managed accordingly.

Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Our Experience and Review of Current Practice

Abstract Background: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is an injury to the carotid or vertebral artery that is nonpenetrating and results from stretching or impingement of the vessel walls due to sudden head movement. Recent studies showed that the incidence of BCVI is around 1%–9%, with stroke being the most dreaded complication. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted after approval by the medical research ethics committee at our tertiary care center, including all consecutive neck computed tomography angiography scans for blunt trauma patients from January 2017 to December 2020. The patient demographics, symptoms, and signs at presentation and imaging were reviewed through the electronic patient records for the presence of BCVI using the modified Denver scoring and Biffl criteria. Patients younger than 18 years, those with penetrating trauma, and patients with no head-and-neck scans were excluded from the study. The treatment and outcome of the positive cases were studied. Results: There were 871 patients with blunt trauma during the study. Of this number, 16 patients were identified with BCVI (1.83%). Most of the patients were male (75%), and the mean age of the cohort was 31 years (18–45 years). Among those with BCVI, five had carotid artery injuries (31%), and 11 had vertebral artery injuries (68.8%). BCVI Grades 2 and 4 were the most prevalent injuries. Ischemic infarction was seen in three patients (18%). Five patients (31.3%) with BCVI received antiplatelet therapy. None of the patients underwent endovascular or surgical treatment. Moreover, there was no BCVI-related mortality. There was a statistically significant between the Biffl grading, type of artery injury, and the presence of neurological deficit at the time of initial presentation, which both turned to be significant with a P = 0.017 and P = 0.049, respectively. Conclusion: BCVI is a serious injury with the potential for neurological complications. The artery involved and Biffl grading influence the presentation. Initiation of therapy with antithrombotic medications for stroke prevention is essential in all patients. The patients with positive findings need follow-up imaging, and an internationally recognized guideline is essential to manage this cohort.

Analysis of Extracranial Cerebrovascular Injuries: Clinical Predictors of Management and Outcomes

Optimal management of traumatic extracranial cerebrovascular injuries (ECVIs) remains undefined. We sought to evaluate the factors that influence management and neurologic outcomes (stroke and brain death) following traumatic ECVI. A retrospective review of a single level 1 trauma center's prospectively maintained data registry of patients older than 18years of age with a diagnosis of ECVI was performed from 2013 to 2019. Injuries limited to the external carotid artery were excluded. Patient demographics, type of injury, timing of presentation, Biffl Classification of Cerebrovascular Injury Grade, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Abbreviated Injury Scale were documented. Ultimate treatments (medical management and procedural interventions) and brain-related outcomes (stroke and brain death) were recorded. ECVIs were identified in 96 patients. The primary mechanism of injury was blunt trauma (89.5% vs. 10.5%, blunt versus penetrating), with 70 cases (66%) of vertebral artery injury and 37 cases of carotid artery injury. Treatments included vascular intervention (6.5%) and medical management (93.5%). Overall outcomes included ipsilateral ischemic stroke (29%) and brain death (6.5%). In the carotid group, vascular intervention was associated with higher Biffl grades (mean Biffl 3.17 vs. 2.23; P=0.087) and decreased incidence of brain death (0% vs. 19%, P=0.006), with no difference seen in ISS scores. Brain death was associated with higher ISS scores (40.29 vs. 24.17, P=0.01), lower glascow coma score on arrival (3.57 vs. 10.63, P<0.001), and increased rates of ischemic stroke (71% vs. 30%, P=0.025). In the vertebral group, neither Biffl grade nor ISS were associated with treatment or outcomes. Regarding the timing of stroke in ECVI, there was no significant difference in the time from presentation to cerebral infarction between the carotid and vertebral artery groups (24.7hr vs. 21.20hr, P=0.739). After this window, 98% of the ECVI cases demonstrated no further aneurysmal degeneration or new neurological deficits beyond the early time period (mean follow-up 9.7months). Blunt cerebrovascular injuries should be viewed distinctly in the carotid and vertebral territories. In cases of injury to the carotid artery, Biffl grade and ISS score are associated with surgical intervention and neurologic events, respectively; vertebral artery injuries did not share this association. Neurologic deficits were detected in a similar time frame between the carotid artery and the vertebral artery injury groups and both groups had rare late neurologic events.