Blunt Carotid Injury Research Articles

Pediatric Carotid Injury after Blunt Trauma and the Necessity of CT and CTA-A Narrative Literature Review.

Background: Blunt carotid injury (BCI) in pediatric trauma is quite rare. Due to the low number of cases, only a few reports and studies have been conducted on this topic. This review will discuss how frequent BCI/blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) on pediatric patients after blunt trauma is, what routine diagnostics looks like, if a computed tomography (CT)/computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan on pediatric patients after blunt trauma is always necessary and if there are any negative health effects. Methods: This narrative literature review includes reviews, systematic reviews, case reports and original studies in the English language between 1999 and 2020 that deal with pediatric blunt trauma and the diagnostics of BCI and BCVI. Furthermore, publications on the risk of radiation exposure for children were included in this study. For literature research, Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane library were used. Results: Pediatric BCI/BCVI shows an overall incidence between 0.03 and 0.5% of confirmed BCI/BCVI cases due to pediatric blunt trauma. In total, 1.1-3.5% of pediatric blunt trauma patients underwent CTA to detect BCI/BCVI. Only 0.17-1.2% of all CTA scans show a positive diagnosis for BCI/BCVI. In children, the median volume CT dose index on a non-contrast head CT is 33 milligrays (mGy), whereas a computed tomography angiography needs at least 138 mGy. A cumulative dose of about 50 mGy almost triples the risk of leukemia, and a cumulative dose of about 60 mGy triples the risk of brain cancer. Conclusions: Given that a BCI/BCVI could have extensive neurological consequences for children, it is necessary to evaluate routine pediatric diagnostics after blunt trauma. CT and CTA are mostly used in routine BCI/BCVI diagnostics. However, since radiation exposure in children should be as low as reasonably achievable, it should be asked if other diagnostic methods could be used to identify risk groups. Trauma guidelines and clinical scores like the McGovern score are established BCI/BCVI screening options, as well as duplex ultrasound.

Endovascular stenting techniques for blunt carotid injury.

While methods of endovascular carotid artery stenting have improved over time, concerns surrounding the safety and efficacy of stenting for blunt carotid injury (BCI) remain. This study aims to present our approach to carotid artery stenting (CAS) by incorporating new technologies such as flow-diverting stents and circuits. There is no robust evidence to support routine carotid artery stenting; however, there are several therapeutic options and approaches for treating BCI that currently require an individualized approach. Endovascular stenting and specific stent selection are largely dictated by the disease process the surgeon intends to treat. We will discuss patient selection, medical management, and the most common revascularization techniques, including transfemoral stenting, trans-carotid arterial revascularization using flow reversal, and stent-assisting coiling. It must be stressed that endovascular intervention is not an alternative to or preclusive of antithrombotic or anticoagulant therapy. In the setting of BCI, transfemoral CAS is most appropriate in patients who are symptomatic, have a rapidly progressing or large lesion, and do not have a soft thrombus present due to risk of embolism. Unlike transfemoral CAS, TCAR offers an elegant solution for embolic protection when patients have a soft thrombus present. In the case of a large pseudoaneurysm, we perform stent-assisted coiling. We practice selective endovascular intervention, stenting lesions that are flow-limiting or have large or rapidly expanding pseudoaneurysms, and only in patients for whom anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents are not contraindicated. As technology and investigation progress, the concerns regarding the safety and the role of endovascular intervention in the treatment of BCI will be more clearly defined.

Transcarotid artery revascularization in blunt carotid injury.

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with flow reversal has substantially changed the management of carotid artery stenosis, enabling an endovascular approach with a periprocedural stroke rate as low as or lower than that of open carotid surgery. The use of TCAR for blunt carotid artery injury has not yet been described. A review of the use of TCAR for blunt carotid artery injury was performed at a single center from October 2020 to August 2021. The patient demographics, mechanism of injury, and outcomes were collected and compared. Ten carotid stents were placed via TCAR in eight patients for hemodynamically significant blunt carotid artery injuries. No periprocedural neurologic events occurred, and all stents remained patent during short-term follow-up. TCAR is feasible and safe in the management of significant blunt carotid artery injuries. More data are needed regarding the long-term outcomes and ideal surveillance intervals.

Transcarotid artery revascularization for the management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries-is it a game changer?

In their 10 patient case series, Walker et al, describe excellent outcomes from the use of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) for the treatment of patients with severe blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI).1Dr. Patrick Walker et al. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Blunt Carotid Injury. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 20XX, 1(1), XX-XX. doi: XXXX.Google Scholar. For a single center over only 2 years this is a large cohort for a relatively rare problem. It is important to note that the primary treatment for BCVI is antithrombotic therapy with antiplatelets and/or anticoagulation. It has been shown that transfemoral carotid artery stenting for BCVI is rarely necessary or beneficial over antithrombotic therapy and the EAST guidelines recommend against routine stenting of grade II or III BCVI.(2)Burlew C.C. Biffl W.L. Moore E.E. Pieracci F.M. Beauchamp K.M. Stovall R. Wagenaar A.E. Jurkovich G.J. Endovascular stenting is rarely necessary for the management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries.J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1012-1017https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.042Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar,(3)Kim D.Y. Biffl W. Bokhari F. Brakenridge S. Chao E. Claridge J.A. Fraser D. Jawa R. Kasotakis G. Kerwin A. et al.Evaluation and management of blunt cerebrovascular injury: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020; 88: 875-887https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002668Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar The Denver group found an alarmingly high 45% occlusion rate in patients treated with stenting vs. only 5% in those treated with antithrombotic therapy and concluded that stenting for BCVI had an unacceptable risk profile.(4)Cothren C.C. Moore E.E. Ray C.E. Ciesla D.J. Johnson J.L. Moore J.B. Burch J.M. Carotid artery stents for blunt cerebrovascular injury: risks exceed benefits.Arch Surg. 2005; 140 (; discussion 485-486): 480-485https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.5.480Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar It seems clear that stenting is rarely indicated for BCVI and this is consistent with the experience of the Maryland Shock Trauma study, as the authors point out that their center diagnoses approximately 300 carotid BCVIs per year, of which only 2-3% were selected for TCAR. It's possible that TCAR may be associated with a lower stroke and complication rate in BCVI patients in a similar manner to its benefits for carotid occlusive disease. Namely, by the use of dynamic flow reversal, which was found by Naazie, et al. in their Vascular Quality Initiative study to be the primary mechanism for stroke protection in TCAR.(5)Naazie I.N. Magee G.A. Mathlouthi A. Elsayed N. Dakour-Aridi H. Malas M.B. Primary mechanism of stroke reduction in transcarotid artery revascularization is dynamic flow reversal.J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74: 187-194https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.082Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar Although the focus of this series is on the novel use of TCAR in the setting of BCVI requiring stenting, the authors describe another innovation, which is the use of Supera stents (Abbott, Plymouth, MN). The authors state that they prefer Supera stents for this application because of its flexibility and length, as they often stent up to the skull base to treat the entirety of the injury. At first glance, this seems to be an usual choice, but their results suggest that the authors may be on to something. Further study is necessary to determine if TCAR is a gamechanger for the management of BCVI and which of these two innovations is the primary reason for improved outcomes. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Blunt Carotid InjuryJournal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and TechniquesPreviewTranscarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with flow reversal has substantially changed the management of carotid artery stenosis, enabling an endovascular approach with a periprocedural stroke rate as low or lower than that of open carotid surgery. The use of TCAR in blunt carotid injury has not yet been described. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Optimal Timing of Operative Intervention for High-grade Carotid Injuries in Patients with Blunt Trauma: A Nationwide Analysis of Trauma Quality Improvement Program

Blunt carotid injuries (BCIs) are rare injuries with an incidence of 1% to 3% in patients with blunt trauma. Earlier diagnosis and treatment are necessary to prevent the morbidity associated with BCIs. Operative intervention (open or endovascular) is indicated for patients with high-grade BCIs. However, there are no guidelines regarding the timing of operative intervention. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of early vs late operative intervention for BCIs.

Case report; successful treatment of traumatic ischaemic hemiplegia secondary to blunt carotid injury associating high grade liver trauma

Introduction and importanceBlunt carotid injury (BCI) injury is a rare sequel of trauma and could result in ischemic complication if not detected and treated early. The presence of high-grade solid organ injury with ongoing bleeding represents additional challenge in treating BCI.Case presentationA 25-year-old victim of motor vehicle collision resulted in grade IV liver, grade III left kidney and grade I spleen injury. He underwent an urgent laparotomy with transient liver packing at local hospital. A full body Contrast-Enhanced Computer Tomography (CECT) upon arrival revealed right internal carotid intimal tear with intra and extra-cranial thrombosis and a 3 cm aneurysm. With a decreased level of consciousness, the patient showed a GCS of 13 and left-sided hemiplegia. After complex multidisciplinary treatment sessions, patient recovered with a partial regain of left-sided muscle power.Clinical discussionSelective embolization of active liver bleeding was a turning point in the management of our patient as it deferred the need for a second operative intervention. It was a necessary step before endovascular stenting and recanalization of the BCI to restore the circulation to the right cerebral hemisphere. Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) was necessary to prevent thrombosis of the stent and continuity of carotid recanalization.ConclusionBCI with traumatic ischaemic hemiplegia associating a sum of life-threatening multiple injuries including high grade liver trauma with ongoing bleeding could still be managed non-operatively with acceptable outcome in the presence of a comprehensive specialized multidisciplinary service.

Aspirin Alone Is Superior Therapy for Grade III Blunt Carotid Injury: A Multicenter Study from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

The optimal treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) remains unclear. Antiplatelet therapy and therapeutic anticoagulation have each demonstrated substantial reductions in BCVI-associated stroke without evidence of the superiority of either. Uncertainty surrounds grade III injury, in particular, because stroke can involve both platelet activation from endothelial injury and thrombus formation within the pseudoaneurysm sac. We hypothesized that treatment of grade III blunt carotid injury (BCI) with aspirin alone would be associated with a decreased rate of subsequent stroke compared with other medical therapies.

How Can We Manage Penetrating Neck Injury with Blunt Carotid Injury and Spinal Injury: Case Report and Review of Literature.

The Neck is a cylindrical structure containing vital neurovascular and visceral structures tightly packed in a relatively small volume. Mortality rate increases when there is an injury to vascular structures especially the carotid artery, surrounded by other vital neurovascular structures; injuring the neck leads to devastating morbidity when compared to other injuries. With increased awareness of screening techniques and improved detection rates, there is an urge in opting for selective neck exploration and initial aggressive antithrombotic therapy for blunt carotid artery injuries. Here we report a case of a 20-year-old male, with a lacerated injury of the right side of the neck causing transection of the right internal jugular vein, grade 4 (Denver classification) blunt carotid injury, along with cervical vertebral fractures without neurological deficits. The patient underwent emergency surgical neck wound exploration, flush ligation of transacted Right Internal Jugular Vein, and conservative management for blunt carotid artery injury using anti platelets (Aspirin and Clopidogrel) avoiding any immediate neurological deficits. Whenever lacerated neck wounds are evaluated, the chance of blunt injury to the carotid is to be borne in mind and such an injury can be managed with double antiplatelet therapy, if there are no demonstrable neurological deficits.

Utility of Routine Computed Tomography Angiogram Screening for Blunt Carotid Injury in Isolated Mandible Fractures

Determine the incidence of blunt carotid injury (BCAI) in the blunt trauma induced isolated mandible fracture population and determine the utility of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) screening for BCAI in this population. A retrospective data review was performed on patients presenting to Boston Medical Center from January 2008 to January 2019 with a diagnosis of mandible fracture. Population selected utilizing ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes for mandible fracture and BCAI. Excluded populations were pediatric (less than 18years) and penetrating carotid injuries. A total of 1,508 mandible fractures were identified, with 73% (n=1,103) being isolated injuries. Five BCAIs were identified, and of these, 1 was associated with an isolated mandible fracture (incidence <0.01%). One of 110 isolated mandible fractures screened for BCAI with the use of CTA was positive (incidence 0.9%). BCAI is a rare finding in isolated mandible fractures. The inclusion of this population as an independent risk factor for BCAI should be questioned. Routine screening with CTA is not warranted.

Utility of Screening for Blunt Carotid Injury in Isolated Mandible Fracture Patients

Utility of Screening for Blunt Carotid Injury in Isolated Mandible Fracture Patients

Carotid Body Tumour Misdiagnosed as a Traumatic Carotid Pseudoaneurysm

Blunt carotid injury that occurs as a result of near-hanging or strangulation carries a significant morbidity as a result of subsequent ischaemic stroke. Clinical examination is poorly predictive in identifying patients with vascular injuries and imaging plays a central role in screening these patients in the emergency setting. We present the case of young woman who presented to the emergency department following near-hanging. CT angiogram examination of the neck demonstrated an enhancing focus at the carotid bifurcation which was initially misidentified as a carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. Ultrasound demonstrated absence of flow within the mass which was interpreted as thrombosis of the pseudoaneurysm. Following an unsuccessful attempt at embolisation, the imaging was reviewed and the correct diagnosis of a carotid body tumour reached. Differentials for an enhancing mass within the carotid space include a pseudoaneurysm, carotid body tumour, enhancing lymph node, schwannoma or neurofibroma. General radiologists should be aware of the imaging distinctions between these carotid space pathologies.

SS11. Blunt Carotid Injury: Timing of Intervention May Influence Outcome

SS11. Blunt Carotid Injury: Timing of Intervention May Influence Outcome

Endovascular Repair of Bilateral Carotid Dissection in a Near Hanging Victim

IntroductionThere is much debate in the literature regarding the management of blunt cervical carotid injuries. This report describes a case of bilateral carotid artery dissection in the very uncommon case of a near hanging victim and the treatment controversies regarding its management.ReportA 50 year old male patient was admitted after attempted suicide through hanging, having been swiftly rescued by a bystander. On admission, six hours after the event there was no neurological deficit. There was evidence of soft tissue damage related to the rope position, subcutaneous emphysema, and neck swelling. The CT angiogram showed dissection of both common carotid arteries with significant luminal narrowing as well as fracture of the thyroid cartilage; brain injury was excluded. Heparin infusion was started and an endovascular repair with bilateral covered stent placement, requiring coverage of the external carotid artery on the left side, was performed. The vascular procedure was uneventful. The patient was discharged 36 days after the event, on dual antiplatelet drugs and under regular psychiatric and speech therapy care, and is currently alive and well 22 months after surgery with no neurological damage.DiscussionThe choice of treatment was not straightforward as there are no guidelines or consensus around its management. In this case, however, an endovascular repair seemed suitable and the result was optimal, with no neurological damage and a good result after 22 months.

Impact of Continuous Evaluation of Technology and Therapy: 30 Years of Research Reduces Stroke and Mortality from Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) was underdiagnosed until the 1990s when blunt carotid injuries were found to be more common than historically described. Technological advancements and regionalization of trauma care have resulted in increased screening and improved diagnosis of BCVI. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that systematic evaluation of the screening and diagnosis of BCVI, combined with early and aggressive treatment, have led to reductions in BCVI-related stroke and mortality. Patients with BCVI from 1985 to 2015 were identified and stratified by age, sex, and Injury Severity Score. BCVI-related stroke and mortality rates were then calculated and compared. Patients were divided into 5 eras based on changes in technology, screening, or treatment algorithms at our institution. Five hundred and sixty-four patients were diagnosed with BCVI: 508 carotid artery and 267 vertebral artery injuries. Sixty-five percent of patients were male, mean age was 41 years, and mean Injury Severity Score was 27. Incidence of BCVI diagnosis increased from 0.33% to approximately 2% of all blunt trauma (p < 0.001) during the study period. Ninety (14%) patients suffered BCVI-related stroke, with the incidence of stroke significantly decreasing over time from 37% to 5% (p < 0.001). Twenty-eight (5%) patients died as a direct result of BCVI, and BCVI-related mortality also decreased significantly over time from 24% to 0% (p < 0.001). Although increased screening has resulted in a higher incidence of injuries over time, BCVI-related stroke and mortality have decreased significantly. Continuous critical evaluation of evolving technology and diagnostic and treatment algorithms has contributed substantially to those improved outcomes. Appraisals of technological advances, preferably through prospective multi-institutional studies, should advance our understanding of these injuries and lead to even lower stroke rates.

Blunt traumatic transection of the right common carotid artery

Background Carotid injuries are infrequent following blunt traumatic injury but can have potentially devastating neurologic consequences. We present a case of a 31-year-old male with right common carotid transection after blunt trauma to the neck. Case report A 31-year-old male with no notable medical history presented as a trauma level one activation after riding his bicycle into an open car door causing a Zone II laceration of his right anterior neck. The patient was hemodynamically normal, had an intact airway and had no neurologic deficits on evaluation in the trauma bay. He underwent a computed tomography angiogram of his neck which revealed a focal dissection of the right common carotid artery causing a 70%–80% luminal narrowing suspicious for a grade II injury. The patient was taken to the operating room for exploration of his neck laceration. He was found to have a grade V injury with complete transection of the right common carotid artery through the intima and media with intact adventitia. The arterial injury was repaired with polytetrafluoroethylene interposition graft. Perioperatively, the patient was started on dual antiplatelet therapy. He recovered uneventfully without neurologic deficits. Conclusion Complete transection of the common carotid artery following blunt trauma is rarely reported. Based on a review of the literature regarding blunt carotid injuries, it is reasonable to repair such injuries with prosthetic graft followed by either systemic anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Management of carotid artery trauma.

With increased awareness and liberal screening of trauma patients with identified risk factors, recent case series demonstrate improved early diagnosis of carotid artery trauma before they become problematio. There remains a need for unified screening criteria for both intracranial and extracranial carotid trauma. In the absence of contraindications, antithrombotic agents should be considered in blunt carotid artery injuries, as there is a significant risk of progression of vessel injury with observation alone. Despite CTA being used as a common screening modality, it appears to lack sufficient sensitivity. DSA remains to be the gold standard in screening. Endovascular techniques are becoming more widely accepted as the primary surgical modality in the treatment of blunt extracranial carotid injuries and penetrating/blunt intracranial carotid lessions. Nonetheless, open surgical approaches are still needed for the treatment of penetrating extracranial carotid injuries and in patients with unfavorable lesions for endovascular intervention.

Sexual asphyxia causing blunt carotid artery injury and Horner's syndrome

To highlight a rare cause of Horner's syndrome, and to review the management of blunt carotid artery injury. Literature search via PubMed for related articles. Horner's syndrome and blunt carotid artery injury are rare phenomena; sexual asphyxia as a cause has not previously been reported. This case is also the first of its kind to have radiological evidence of injury to the external carotid artery but not the internal carotid artery. In Horner's syndrome, additional symptoms of ipsilateral headache or neck pain, tinnitus, or any cerebral ischaemic symptoms should raise suspicion of blunt carotid injury. Blunt carotid artery injury is a potentially fatal condition and can present without radiological evidence. Early recognition and management with anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs is crucial to prevent mortality and morbidity.

Predicting Outcomes Using the National Trauma Data Bank: Optimum Management of Traumatic Blunt Carotid and Blunt Thoracic Injury

We used the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to examine the incidence of blunt thoracic and carotid trauma nationally and survival outcomes based on treatment approach. All vascular traumas were identified from the 2008 NTDB. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis coding was used to identify 178 blunt thoracic aortic injuries and 313 traumatic blunt carotid injuries. In all, 2089 vascular traumas were identified. Patients with blunt thoracic trauma within the highest injury severity score (ISS) range (61-75) had a significant survival advantage when observation was compared with endovascular management (P < .05). In the carotid trauma cohort, those with the highest ISS range (61-75) had a significant survival advantage with open surgery compared with observation (P < .01). Patients with traumatic blunt thoracic injury and an ISS > 61 appeared to benefit from endovascular approaches compared with open management. Patients with blunt carotid trauma and an ISS > 61 appeared to benefit from open surgical management.

Endovascular Treatment of Bilateral Carotid Artery Dissections Progressing to Pseudoaneurysms After Blunt Carotid Injury: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Endovascular Treatment of Bilateral Carotid Artery Dissections Progressing to Pseudoaneurysms After Blunt Carotid Injury: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Traumatic Ptosis and Mydriasis Masking Horner Syndrome From an Internal Carotid Pseudoaneurysm

A 46-year-old woman presented after blunt facial trauma for evaluation of bilateral orbital floor fractures, which were confirmed by clinical and radiographic examination. In addition, findings of right traumatic mydriasis and left traumatic ptosis were seen. On close investigation, miosis was noted on the side of the traumatic ptosis. Therefore, a workup for Horner syndrome was obtained, including neuro-ophthalmic consultation and magnetic resonance angiography of the neck. The magnetic resonance angiography showed an internal carotid pseudoaneurysm, an uncommon but potentially fatal complication of blunt carotid injury. The authors describe an interesting case where a life-threatening diagnosis was nearly masked by more common, benign pathology.