Abstract This experiment was aimed to determine how variables such as water intake, feed intake, ruminal conditions, digestion, blood constituent levels, energy metabolism, and performance of yearling meat goats are influenced by different natural sources of brackish/saline water. Two animal types (AT), 18 Boer (BOE) and 18 Spanish (SPA) doelings, with the age of 8.9 ± 0.306, and 9.7 ± 0.212 months, respectively were used for the experiment which lasted 17 weeks (16 weeks for the experiment and 1 week of adaptation). Drinking water treatments were fresh water (FRW), West pasture Brackish water (BRW), water classified by USGS as group 1 (GR-1), 2 (GR-2), 3 (GR-3), and the last one did not fit well with any USGS group (G-UC). Animals were fed a medium-quality grass hay primarily consisting of lespedeza and with some Johnson grass (12.2% CP, and 48% NDF on a DM basis) and a supplement was provided at 0.2% BW (DM basis) to supply trace minerals, vitamins, and protein. Average daily gain was similar (P > 0.05) among treatments (16.3, 20.1, 21.1, 20.7, 23.3, and 26.5 g/day SEM = 6.378 for FRW, BRW, GR-1, GR-2, GR-3 and G-UC, respectively), and between AT (19.9 and 22.7 g/day SEM = 3.90 for BOE and SPA, respectively). Treatment did not affect water (P = 0.752; 830, 767, 821, 796, 855, and 857 g/day; SEM = 47.86) or hay intake (P = 0.862; 682, 654, 641, 674, 650, and 689 g/day SEM = 31.72), and also there were no differences between AT in intakes of water (P = 0.157; 850 and 793 g/day; SEM = 27.63) and hay (P = 0.165; 684 and 647 g/day SEM = 18.31) for BOE and SPA, respectively. Treatment had no effect on blood packed cell volume (PCV; P = 0.224; 28, 27.4, 29.7, 25.7, 26.2, 27.5%), hemoglobin concentration (tHb; P = 0.489; 11.2, 10.6, 11.2, 10.4, 10.3, 10.6 g/dL) or osmolality (310, 310, 309, 310, 309, and 309 mOsm/L) for FRW, BRW, GR-1, GR-2, GR-3 and G-UC, respectively. But there were differences between AT in PCV (P < 0.001; 24.8 and 30%) and tHb (P < 0.001; 9.71 and 11.7 g/dL) for BOE and SPA, respectively. Animal types differed in their heat (P = 0.046; 3.94 and 3.70 MJ/day; SEM = 0.081) and methane production (P < 0.001; 0.50 and 0.42 MJ/day; SEM = 0.014) for BOE and SPA, respectively; but treatment did not affect heat energy (P = 0.861; 3.84, 3.77, 3.67, 3.88, 3.88, 3.86 MJ/day SEM = 0.1409) or methane energy (P = 0.634; 0.46, 0.43, 0.45, 0.47, 0.48, 0.48; SEM = 0.0241) for FRW, BRW, GR-1, GR-2, GR-3 and G-UC, respectively. Though differences existed between animal types, considering lack of effect of drinking water used in the studied parameters, the animals seemed resilient to the brackish water from West pasture, USGS group 1, 2, 3 and the unclassified water.