Blinded Independent Review Committee Research Articles

Abstract CT286: TILVANCE-301, a phase 3 study of lifileucel tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in combination with pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab alone in treatment-naive unresectable or metastatic melanoma

Abstract Introduction: Novel early-line therapies for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma are needed to improve the rate of deep and durable responses and increase the proportion of patients with long-term benefit. TILVANCE-301 will evaluate the efficacy and safety of lifileucel autologous TIL cell therapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with untreated advanced melanoma. Methods: TILVANCE-301 (NCT05727904) is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel group study that will randomize ~670 patients (1:1; Day 0) to Arm A: lifileucel plus pembrolizumab (Day 3: tumor tissue resection for TIL manufacturing; Day 5: pembrolizumab 200 mg; Day 26: pembrolizumab 400 mg; Day 28-29: cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg; Day 28-32: fludarabine 25 mg/m2; Day 33: lifileucel; Day 34-37: ≤6 doses of high-dose IL-2; Week 10: pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W) or Arm B: pembrolizumab alone (same pembrolizumab dosing as Arm A). Patients in Arm B with confirmed progressive disease verified by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) have the option to receive lifileucel monotherapy as immediate next treatment and may continue pembrolizumab until start of nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion. Eligible adults have histologically confirmed advanced melanoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, estimated life expectancy >6 months, ≥1 resectable lesion to generate lifileucel, and ≥1 remaining measurable lesion. Prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors may be allowed. Prior therapy for metastatic disease, symptomatic untreated brain metastases, organ allograft or prior cell therapy, uveal/ocular melanoma, and chronic systemic steroid therapy are not permitted. The dual primary efficacy endpoints are BIRC-assessed (RECIST v1.1) objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary efficacy endpoint is overall survival. Additional secondary efficacy endpoints include BIRC-assessed complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and event-free survival (EFS); investigator-assessed ORR, PFS, CR rate, DOR, EFS, and PFS2; and safety as characterized by severity and seriousness of treatment-emergent adverse events and relationship to study drug. Exploratory endpoints include in vivo T-cell persistence (unique CDR3 sequences in peripheral blood mononuclear cell [PBMC] over time) and correlative biomarkers (eg, lifileucel phenotypic and functional characteristics; lifileucel, tumor, and PBMC gene expression profiles; tumor mutational landscape). The study will enroll globally, with initial sites in Europe, North America, and Australia. Trial registration: NCT05727904 Citation Format: Sajeve Thomas, Young Ki Hong, Yazan Samhouri, James Larkin, David J. Olson, Gino K. In, Victoria Atkinson, Philip Lammers, Andrew J. Furness, Juan Martin-Liberal, Patrick Terheyden, Andrew S. Poklepovic, Ryan H. Nguyen, Idit Peretz, Marcus Butler, Adnan Khattak, Lavinia Spain, E.M. Gaughan, Melissa Wilson, John W. Dubay, Anja Williams, Stephanie Goff, Gary C. Doolittle, Jason Chesney, Friedrich Graf Finckenstein, Jeffrey Chou, Xiao Wu, Giri Sulur, Wen Shi, John Haanen. TILVANCE-301, a phase 3 study of lifileucel tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in combination with pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab alone in treatment-naive unresectable or metastatic melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT286.

Methodology of the SORENTO clinical trial: a prospective, randomised, active-controlled phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of high exposure octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) in patients with GEP-NET

BackgroundThe current standard of care (SoC) for the initial treatment of unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) requires initiation of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy, octreotide and lanreotide, which provide safe and efficacious tumour/symptom control in most patients. However, disease progression can occur with SoC SRL treatment and the optimal dose response of SRL remains unknown. Octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) is a novel, long-acting, high-exposure formulation that has shown greater bioavailability and improved administration than octreotide long-acting release (LAR) with a well-tolerated safety profile. Retrospective data have highlighted a potential benefit of high-exposure SRL for improved disease control in patients who did not adequately respond to the current SoC SRL treatment. This trial will investigate the efficacy and tolerability of CAM2029 compared to the current SoC, including octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel (ATG).MethodsSORENTO is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label phase 3 trial aiming to demonstrate superiority of treatment with 20 mg octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) every 2 weeks (Q2W) compared to treatment with the Investigator’s choice of SRL therapy at standard doses for tumour control (octreotide LAR 30 mg or lanreotide ATG 120 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]) as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) in approximately 300 patients with unresectable/metastatic and well-differentiated GEP-NET. Upon confirmation of disease progression (determined by a Blinded Independent Review Committee [BIRC] and defined as per RECIST 1.1), patients may enter an open-label extension treatment period with once weekly dosing, to investigate the effects of higher frequency dosing. Overall survival follow-up will end a maximum of 2 years after primary analysis. The primary endpoint will be analysed after 194 confirmed PFS events.DiscussionThis is the first trial investigating the efficacy of CAM2029 versus SoC SRL therapy using a head-to-head, superiority trial design. It is expected to be the first trial to investigate the efficacy of increased dosing frequency of a high-exposure SRL. A BIRC will limit bias and measurement variability and ensure high-quality efficacy data. Additionally, inclusion of patients with well-differentiated Grade 3 NET may elucidate treatment strategies for this rarely investigated patient population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05050942. Registered on 21st September 2021.

CTNI-51. A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF VORASIDENIB VS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH MUTANT IDH1/2 DIFFUSE GLIOMA (INDIGO): EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF VARIANT ALLELE FREQUENCY AND PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL

Abstract INTRODUCTION Vorasidenib is an oral, brain-penetrant, inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1/2 enzymes. The INDIGO study (NCT04164901) showed significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) with vorasidenib, compared with placebo, in patients with mIDH1/2 adulttype diffuse glioma (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.27–0.56; one-sided P = 0.000000067 [Mellinghoff N Engl J Med 2023]). The key secondary endpoint of time-to-next-intervention was also met. METHODS In this double-blind Phase 3 study, patients aged ≥ 12 years with residual/recurrent grade 2 mIDH1/2 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma, measurable non-enhancing disease, and no prior treatment for glioma were randomized 1:1 to receive vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily in 28-day cycles. An investigational clinical trial assay centrally confirmed IDH1 R132H/C/G/S/L or IDH2 R172K/M/W/S/G mutation variants. Pretreatment (archival) tumor tissue was analyzed by next-generation sequencing for CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and other co-mutations (ACE Extended Cancer Panel). RESULTS As of Sep 6, 2022 (preplanned second interim analysis), 168 patients were randomized to vorasidenib and 163 to placebo (median age, 40.0 years; Karnofsky performance scale = 100, 53.5%; oligodendroglioma, 172; astrocytoma, 159; mIDH1, 315; mIDH2, 16). Two patient subgroups were defined by baseline IDH1/2 variant allele frequency (VAF): lower/higher than the median value (0.377). The median PFS results favored vorasidenib over placebo in both subgroups (low VAF, one-sided P = 0.0116; high VAF, one-sided P < 0.0001). Vorasidenib and placebo groups had similar and a low number of co-mutations in known/likely oncogenic genes at baseline (median number of co-mutations across both groups was 4). CDKN2A homozygous deletion was detected in only two participants (both in the placebo group). Additional data will be presented. CONCLUSION In the first randomized Phase 3 study of a targeted therapy in grade 2 mIDH1/2 glioma, vorasidenib prolonged median PFS by BIRC, relative to placebo, irrespective of IDH1/2 VAF.

LTBK-06. IMPACT OF VORASIDENIB TREATMENT ON MUTANT IDH1 OR IDH2 DIFFUSE GLIOMA TUMOR GROWTH RATE: RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PHASE 3 INDIGO STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION The INDIGO study (NCT04164901) showed that vorasidenib, an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1/2, significantly improved imaging-based progression-free survival and time-to-next-intervention compared with placebo in patients with grade 2 mIDH1/2 glioma previously treated with surgery only. Given the limitations of traditional bi-dimensional measurements, evaluating volumetry and tumor growth rate (TGR) is an additional method of measuring treatment effect in these diffuse growing tumors. METHODS Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed at baseline and every 12 weeks on-treatment; up to three pre-treatment MRI scans were requested when available. Tumor volumes were derived per blinded independent review committee using a semi-automated approach. TGR was defined as percentage change in tumor volume every 6 months. Patients with evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 MRI during the corresponding period were included in the analysis. The difference in TGR in each arm was assessed by slope of tumor growth over time using a linear mixed model. RESULTS 331 patients were randomized to vorasidenib (n=168) or placebo (n=163). Median follow-up was 14.2 months. On-treatment TGR was −2.5% (95% CI, −4.7, −0.2) with vorasidenib (n=167) and 13.9% (95% CI, 11.1, 16.8) with placebo (n=161). In patients with available imaging data, TGR pre- and post-treatment with vorasidenib (n=56) was 13.2% (95% CI, 10.3, 16.3) and −3.3% (95% CI, −5.2, −1.2), respectively, while placebo (n=67) was 18.3% (95% CI, 15.0, 21.7) and 12.2% (95% CI, 9.5, 14.9), respectively. In patients who crossed over from placebo with available imaging data (n=38), TGR pre- and post-crossover was 22.4% (95% CI, 15.7, 29.4) and 5.2% (95% CI, −3.8, 15.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Tumor growth was observed in patients with mIDH1/2 gliomas before receiving vorasidenib or placebo. Treatment with vorasidenib reduced the TGR and shrunk tumor volume, whereas continued growth in tumor volume was observed in patients receiving placebo.

QOL-26. A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF VORASIDENIB VS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH MUTANT IDH1/2DIFFUSE GLIOMA (INDIGO): ANALYSIS OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE, NEUROCOGNITION AND SEIZURES

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Phase 3 INDIGO study (NCT04164901) is a randomized, double-blind evaluation of vorasidenib, an oral, brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1/2 enzymes, compared with placebo, in patients with grade 2 mIDH1/2 diffuse gliomas, whose only prior treatment was surgery. The primary endpoint, radiographic progression-free survival by blinded independent review committee, and the key secondary endpoint, time-to-next-intervention, were significantly improved with vorasidenib versus placebo. As these patients are young, with several years’ life expectancy, impact of treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cognition and symptomatic burden is of interest. METHODS HRQoL, assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACTBr) questionnaire, was a secondary endpoint. FACT-Br was collected at baseline, Cycles 2 and 3, then every 3 months. Scores were interpreted using an estimate of clinically meaningful deterioration change from baseline for each arm. Exploratory endpoints included neurocognitive function, assessed by a validated battery of cognitive performance instruments, and seizure frequency and severity, assessed using a subject diary. RESULTS 331 patients were randomized to vorasidenib (n = 168) or placebo (n = 163) (median age, 40.0 years; Karnofsky performance scale = 100, 53.5%; ongoing medical history of seizures, 54.1%). Median follow-up was 14.2 months. No clinically meaningful deterioration from baseline FACT-Br total score and subscales were observed at any timepoint through the median treatment duration (Cycle 13) in either arm. At baseline, active seizures (≥ 1 seizure in the previous 30 days) were reported in 20/168 (11.9%) vorasidenib patients and 20/163 (12.3%) placebo patients. On-treatment seizure frequencies and cognition outcomes will be presented by arm. CONCLUSION INDIGO is the first randomized Phase 3 study of targeted therapy in grade 2 mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma. HRQoL, as measured by FACT-Br, was maintained during treatment with vorasidenib. These data support the clinical benefit of vorasidenib in this patient population for whom chemotherapy and radiotherapy are being delayed.

Sintilimab Injection Combination with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in Patients with Localized Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Trial in Progress

Esophageal cancer had accounted for the sixth highest incidence and the fourth highest death rate in China. The predominant histological subtype is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). At initial diagnosis, more than half of patients with ESCC are unfit for surgery. An accepted alternative to surgery is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT); however, many patients experience local recurrence or distant metastasis after cCRT. Therefore, innovative therapies are needed. Sintilimab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody, exhibiting the highest affinity for human PD-1 and a lower off-rate, the PD-1 receptor occupancy of sintilimab on circulating T cells is superior. In previous studies, sintilimab, alone and in combination with chemotherapy, was generally well tolerated and had antitumor activity in patients with advanced ESCC. This prospective, single-arm study (NCT04602013) is designed to explore the efficacy of Sintilimab in combination with cCRT. Eligible patients have histologically confirmed localized ESCC for whom cCRT is suitable and surgery is unsuitable/ declined; patients couldn't have received prior chemoradiotherapy. Approximately 53 Chinese patients from 5 centers will be to receive sintilimab (body weight <60kg: 3mg/kg IV Q3W; body weight ≥60kg: 200mg IV Q3W) in combination with cisplatin (25 mg/m2 IV on Days 1-3 of each 3-week cycle) plus paclitaxel for injection (albumin bound) (180 mg/m2). and radiotherapy at a total dose of 60Gy. Duration of treatment will be up to 12 months for sintilimab, including two cycles for concurrent administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by a Blinded Independent Review Committee per RECIST v1.1, is the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary efficacy endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response, and overall survival. Incidence and severity of adverse events (CTCAE V5.0) and patient-reported outcomes of health-related quality of life are additional secondary endpoints. A total of 17 patients have completed sintilimab injection combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy,17/53 (32%). Objective response rate (ORR) 62.5% and a median progression free survival (mPFS) 17 months. 1-year overall survival (OS) 88.2%. The most common AEs included granulocytopenia (43.7%), thrombo -cytopenia (56.2%), radiation esophagitis (50%), nausea and vomiting (50%), and immune pneumonia (18.7%). Of these AEs greater than grade 3 granulocytopenia (25.0%), thrombocytopenia (35.0%), radiation esophagitis (12.5%), and nausea and vomiting (31.3%), and one patient developed grade 3 immune pneumonia (6.2%), which recovered with treatment. The treatment of sintilimab with CCRT is safe and effective for localized ESCC patients, even with high-dose radiotherapy (60Gy). This study may help to address the unmet need for new therapeutic options for patients with localized ESCC.

Q-TWiST analysis of survival benefits with brigatinib versus crizotinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer based on results of the ALTA-1L trial

ObjectivesThe ALTA-1L phase 3 open-label trial demonstrated increased progression-free survival (PFS) with brigatinib versus crizotinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK-positive) locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with ALK-targeted therapy. This post-hoc analysis of data from the ALTA-1L trial used the quality-adjusted (QA) time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) methodology to compare the QA survival benefit of brigatinib versus crizotinib in this patient population. Patients and MethodsThe Q-TWiST analysis was performed using final (January 29, 2021) individual patient-level blinded independent review committee (BIRC)- and investigator-assessed survival data for brigatinib (n = 137) and crizotinib (n = 138) in adult patients (N = 275) with ALK-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC previously untreated with ALK-targeted therapy. Q-TWiST was compared between the two treatments. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients stratified by various clinicopathological characteristics, including presence or absence of brain metastases at baseline. ResultsBrigatinib was associated with significantly longer time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (P < 0.001) than crizotinib, with significantly greater Q-TWiST (mean [SE] months: BIRC-assessed, 28.2 [1.2] versus 25.1 [1.1], P = 0.045; investigator-assessed, 28.5 [1.2] versus 24.8 [1.1], P = 0.018). Relative gains in Q-TWiST with brigatinib compared to crizotinib were clinically meaningful (BIRC-assessed, 10.4%; investigator-assessed, 12.3%). Patients with brain metastases at baseline receiving brigatinib had significantly greater Q-TWiST (mean [SE] months: BIRC-assessed, 29.0 [1.9] versus 19.0 [1.9], P = 0.0001) than those receiving crizotinib. ConclusionFirst-line brigatinib treatment was associated with significant and clinically meaningful gains in Q-TWiST compared to crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, supporting the results of the ALTA-1L trial and brigatinib as a safe and effective first-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC.

Brigatinib Versus Alectinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC After Disease Progression on Crizotinib: Results of Phase 3 ALTA-3 Trial

IntroductionThis open-label, phase 3 trial (ALTA-3; NCT03596866) compared efficacy and safety of brigatinib versus alectinib for ALK+ NSCLC after disease progression on crizotinib. MethodsPatients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC that progressed on crizotinib were randomized 1:1 to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in, 90 mg) or alectinib 600 mg twice daily, aiming to test superiority. The primary end point was blinded independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Interim analysis for efficacy and futility was planned at approximately 70% of 164 expected PFS events. ResultsThe population (N = 248; brigatinib, n = 125; alectinib, n = 123) was notable for long median duration of prior crizotinib (16.0–16.8 mo) and low rate of ALK fusion in baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; 78 of 232 [34%]). Median blinded independent review committee–assessed PFS was 19.3 months with brigatinib and 19.2 months with alectinib (hazard ratio = 0.97 [95% confidence interval: 0.66–1.42], p = 0.8672]). The study met futility criterion. Overall survival was immature (41 events [17%]). Exploratory analyses pooled across the treatment groups revealed median PFS of 11.1 versus 22.5 months in patients with versus without ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion at baseline (hazard ratio: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.32–0.71]). Treatment-related adverse events in more than 30% of patients (brigatinib, alectinib) were elevated levels of blood creatine phosphokinase (70%, 29%), aspartate aminotransferase (53%, 38%), and alanine aminotransferase (40%, 36%). ConclusionsBrigatinib was not superior to alectinib for PFS in crizotinib-pretreated ALK+ NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the well-established and unique profiles of each drug. The low proportion of patients with ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion may account for prolonged PFS with both drugs in ALTA-3.

Contribution of MEK Inhibition to BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Combination Treatment of BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: Part 2 of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III COLUMBUS Trial.

In COLUMBUS part 1, patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice a day (COMBO450), vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily (ENCO300). As previously reported, COMBO450 improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus vemurafenib (part 1 primary end point) and ENCO300 (part 1 key secondary end point; not statistically significant). Part 2, requested by the US Food and Drug Administration, evaluated the contribution of binimetinib by maintaining the same encorafenib dosage in the combination (encorafenib 300 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily [COMBO300]) and ENCO300 arms. In part 2, patients were randomly assigned 3:1 to COMBO300 or ENCO300. ENCO300 (parts 1 and 2) data were combined, per protocol, for PFS analysis (key secondary end point) by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Other analyses included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety. Two hundred fifty-eight patients received COMBO300, and 86 received ENCO300. Per protocol, ENCO300 arms (parts 1 and 2 combined) were also evaluated (n = 280). The median follow-up for ENCO300 was 40.8 months (part 1) and 57.1 months (part 2). The median PFS (95% CI) was 12.9 months (10.9 to 14.9) for COMBO300 versus 9.2 months (7.4 to 11.1) for ENCO300 (parts 1 and 2) and 7.4 months (5.6 to 9.2) for ENCO300 (part 2). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for COMBO300 was 0.74 (0.60 to 0.92; two-sided P = .003) versus ENCO300 (parts 1 and 2). The ORR by BIRC (95% CI) was 68% (62 to 74) and 51% (45 to 57) for COMBO300 and ENCO300 (parts 1 and 2), respectively. COMBO300 had greater relative dose intensity and fewer grade 3/4 adverse events than ENCO300. COMBO300 improved PFS, ORR, and tolerability compared with ENCO300, confirming the contribution of binimetinib to efficacy and safety.

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CARES-310): a randomised, open-label, international phase 3 study

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been shown to improve overall survival versus anti-angiogenic therapy alone in advanced solid tumours, but not in hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, a clinical study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus the VEGFR2-targeted TKI rivoceranib (also known as apatinib) versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This randomised, open-label, international phase 3 trial (CARES-310) was done at 95 study sites across 13 countries and regions worldwide. Patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma who had not previously received any systemic treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus rivoceranib 250 mg orally once daily or sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. Randomisation was done via a centralised interactive response system. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival, as assessed by the blinded independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. We report the findings from the prespecified primary analysis for progression-free survival and interim analysis for overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03764293). Between June 28, 2019, and March 24, 2021, 543 patients were randomly assigned to the camrelizumab-rivoceranib (n=272) or sorafenib (n=271) group. At the primary analysis for progression-free survival (May 10, 2021), median follow-up was 7·8 months (IQR 4·1-10·6). Median progression-free survival was significantly improved with camrelizumab-rivoceranib versus sorafenib (5·6 months [95% CI 5·5-6·3] vs 3·7 months [2·8-3·7]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [95% CI 0·41-0·65]; one-sided p<0·0001). At the interim analysis for overall survival (Feb 8, 2022), median follow-up was 14·5 months (IQR 9·1-18·7). Median overall survival was significantly extended with camrelizumab-rivoceranib versus sorafenib (22·1 months [95% CI 19·1-27·2] vs 15·2 months [13·0-18·5]; HR 0·62 [95% CI 0·49-0·80]; one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (102 [38%] of 272 patients in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib group vs 40 [15%] of 269 patients in the sorafenib group), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (33 [12%] vs 41 [15%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase (45 [17%] vs 14 [5%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase (35 [13%] vs eight [3%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 66 (24%) patients in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib group and 16 (6%) in the sorafenib group. Treatment-related death occurred in two patients: one patient in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib group (ie, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome) and one patient in the sorafenib group (ie, respiratory failure and circulatory collapse). Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in progression-free survival and overall survival compared with sorafenib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, presenting as a new and effective first-line treatment option for this population. Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals and Elevar Therapeutics.

Efficacy and safety of KN046, a novel bispecific antibody against PD-L1 and CTLA-4, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who failed platinum-based chemotherapy: a phase II study

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KN046, a novel recombinant humanised antibody targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after failure or intolerance to platinum-based chemotherapy. MethodsIn this multi-centre, open-label phase II clinical trial, patients were enroled after failure or intolerance to platinum-based chemotherapy. KN046 at 3 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2weeks. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) evaluated by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). ResultsA total of 30 and 34 patients were included in the 3 mg/kg (cohort A) and 5 mg/kg (cohort B) cohorts. On 31st August 2021, the median follow-up duration was 24.08 months (interquartile [IQR], 22.28, 24.84) and 19.35months (IQR, 17.25, 20.90) in the 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. BIRC-assessed ORRs were 13.3% and 14.7% in the 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.22–7.29) and 3.68 (95%CI 1.81–7.39) months, while overall survival was 19.70 (95.5%CI 15.44-not estimated [NE]) and 13.04 (95.5%CI 9.86-NE) months, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were anaemia (28.1%), hyperglycaemia (26.7%), and infusion-related reactions (26.7%). The incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs and TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were 42.2% and 14.1%, respectively. ConclusionsBoth 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg KN046 showed promising efficacy and favourable safety profile for advanced NSCLC after failure or intolerance to previous platinum-based chemotherapy. Trial registration numberNCT03838848

KontRASt-02: A phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of the KRASG12C inhibitor JDQ443 vs docetaxel in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic, KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC.

TPS9144 Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS) is the most frequent mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS G12C is the most common KRAS variant, present in ~13% of patients (pts) with non-squamous NSCLC. KRAS G12C mutations cause the accumulation of active, GTP-bound KRAS, which leads to activation of downstream pathways involved in cell proliferation and invasiveness. JDQ443 is a potent, structurally novel, selective KRASG12C inhibitor that irreversibly traps KRASG12C in its inactive, GDP-bound form. Data from the JDQ443 monotherapy arm of the first-in-human KontRASt-01 study demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile of JDQ443 in pts with previously treated, KRAS G12C-mutated, advanced NSCLC. For pts with advanced NSCLC who progress following first-line immunotherapy or doublet platinum-based chemotherapy, single agent docetaxel remains a standard option, although it presents modest activity and is generally poorly tolerated. In this context, alternative treatment options are needed to improve pt outcomes. Methods: KontRASt-02 (NCT05132075) is a global, Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study evaluating JDQ443 as a monotherapy in comparison to docetaxel in pts with KRAS G12C-mutated, advanced NSCLC previously treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy (either in combination or as sequential treatments). Approximately 360 pts stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 and 2) and prior therapy (platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy combined vs sequential) will be randomized at 1:1 to receive 200 mg oral JDQ443 twice daily continuously or 75 mg/m2 intravenous docetaxel once every 21 days. The primary endpoint of this study is progression-free survival (PFS) per Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) according to RECIST version 1.1. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS); other secondary endpoints include objective response rate, disease control rate, time to response, duration of response, PFS on subsequent therapy, safety of JDQ443 monotherapy, pt-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, time to deterioration of ECOG performance status, and safety in pts who crossover from docetaxel to JDQ443. Exploratory objectives include biomarker analyses aimed at investigating predictors of responsiveness to JDQ443. Pts randomized to docetaxel will be allowed to crossover to JDQ443 following confirmed disease progression per BIRC. To allow more pts to be treated with JDQ443, crossover will also be offered to all patients on docetaxel if the primary endpoint (PFS) is met. Treatment beyond progression will be allowed for pts receiving JDQ443 according to investigator judgement. The KontRASt-02 study is currently enrolling pts. Clinical trial information: NCT05132075 .

A phase II trial of JDQ443 in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC with PD-L1 expression &lt;1% or PD-L1 expression ≥1% and an STK11 co-mutation.

TPS9158 Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS G12C, the most frequent KRAS variant, is found in ~13% of patients (pts) with NSCLC. KRAS is a GTPase that regulates cell signaling pathways necessary for proliferation, differentiation, and survival. KRAS mutation reduces the intrinsic GTPase activity of the enzyme, allowing for the accumulation of active, GTP-bound KRAS and hyperactivation of downstream signaling, driving tumorigenesis. JDQ443 is a potent, selective KRASG12C inhibitor that irreversibly traps KRASG12C in its inactive, GDP bound state and blocks downstream signaling. In preliminary data from the Phase Ib part of the KontRASt-01 study (NCT04699188), JDQ443 showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in previously treated pts with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC. Pts with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC currently receive the same first-line (1L) treatment as those without driver mutations, consisting of immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy; however, ~30% of pts with NSCLC present with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression &lt;1%, and ~10–20% of pts harbor an STK11 mutation, both indicators of poor response to immunotherapy. Therefore, alternative 1L treatment options are needed for these pts. Of note, PD-L1 expression and STK11 mutation do not affect responsiveness to KRASG12C inhibitors, raising interest in the evaluation of these targeted therapies as 1L alternatives to immunotherapy for pts with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. Methods: KontRASt-06 (NCT05445843) is an open-label, Phase II, single-arm, multicenter study evaluating JDQ443 monotherapy (200 mg JDQ443 twice daily in 21-day cycles) as a 1L treatment for 2 cohorts of adult pts with locally advanced or metastatic, KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. Cohort A (n=90) includes pts whose tumors have PD-L1 expression &lt;1%, regardless of STK11 mutation status, while Cohort B (n=30) includes pts whose tumors have PD-L1 expression ≥1% and an STK11 co-mutation. Local testing for PD-L1 status and KRAS and STK11 mutations is accepted; KRAS and STK11 mutations may be assessed in blood samples. A tissue sample is required for retrospective biomarker status confirmation and exploratory study. The study is currently enrolling pts into both cohorts. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1, assessed by a blinded independent review committee, in Cohort A. Key secondary endpoints are ORR in Cohort B and duration of response in both cohorts. Other secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pt-reported outcomes. A comprehensive biomarker strategy aims to investigate predictors of treatment response and resistance in the study population. © 2023 American Association for Cancer Research®. Reused with permission. Clinical trial information: NCT05445843 .

Aumolertinib with chemotherapy or alone compared with osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (TREBLE).

TPS9153 Background: Aumolertinib is a novel third-generation (3G) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Safety and efficacy of aumolertinib have been demonstrated in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic (LA/m) NSCLC. (Lu, 2021; Lu, 2022) A phase 3 study in these patients in the first-line setting showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for aumolertinib vs gefitinib (median 19.3 months versus 9.9 months; P &lt; 0.0001). Aumolertinib was generally well-tolerated. (Lu, 2022) Aumolertinib is approved in China for patients with LA/m NSCLC who have an EGFR T790M resistance mutation upon disease progression and for treatment naïve patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Studies evaluating first-generation EGFR-TKI + chemotherapy (chemo) showed improved PFS in select patient populations. (Hosomi, 2019) It is unclear if the addition of chemo to a 3G EGFR-TKI will improve PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated LA/m NSCLC. As the addition of chemo to a 3G EGFR-TKI may prove warranted, there is a need to understand the relative efficacy and safety in the diversity of patients encountered in routine clinical practice. (Tanaka, 2021). Methods: This is a randomized, multi-regional, phase 3 clinical trial comparing aumolertinib + chemo or aumolertinib monotherapy with osimertinib monotherapy. Patients are eligible if they have stage IIIB, IVA, or IVB NSCLC; harbor ex19del or L858R EGFR mutations alone or with other EGFR mutations; and have an ECOG PS of ≤2. Patients are ineligible if they received prior systemic therapy for mNSCLC or are a candidate for curative intent therapy. Eligible patients will be randomized 2:2:1 and stratified by mutation status (ex19del or L858R), ECOG PS (0 vs 1/2), and race (White vs Asian vs other races combined). Anticipated enrollment is 500 patients; 200 to receive aumolertinib + chemo (110 mg PO QD aumolertinib + investigator's choice chemo), 200 to receive osimertinib (80 mg PO QD), and 100 to receive aumolertinib (110 mg PO QD). The primary endpoint is PFS, by blinded independent review committee (BICR) per RECIST 1.1, for aumolertinib + chemo vs osimertinib. Overall survival (OS) is a key secondary endpoint for aumolertinib + chemo vs osimertinib. Additional efficacy endpoints will be assessed for aumolertinib + chemo vs osimertinib and aumolertinib vs osimertinib, as well as safety and patient reported outcomes. Exploratory endpoints include characterizing mechanisms of acquired resistance across all arms, CNS efficacy, and exposure-response relationship. Enrollment began in July 2022. The study is currently recruiting and will include approximately 200 sites globally. The study design will provide a power of 80% at a 2-sided Type I error of 0.05 for the primary endpoint. If the primary endpoint is statistically significant, a sequential test method will be used to evaluate OS. Clinical trial information: NCT05493501 .

A phase 3 study (TILVANCE-301) to assess the efficacy and safety of lifileucel, an autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy, in combination with pembrolizumab compared with pembrolizumab alone in patients with untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

TPS9607 Background: Most patients (pts) with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma receiving front-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy progress within a year (Robert Lancet Oncol 2019; Larkin NEJM 2019; Tawbi NEJM 2022). Early-line therapies are needed to improve the rate of deep and durable responses and increase the proportion of pts with long-term benefit. Lifileucel demonstrated an ORR of 31.4% and median DOR not reached (median 36.5 mo follow-up) in pts with post-ICI advanced melanoma (Sarnaik SITC 2022). Earlier-line treatment with lifileucel plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in pts with ICI-naïve advanced melanoma demonstrated an ORR of 67%, including a CR rate of 25% (Iovance Press Release, April 5, 2022; O’Malley JITC 2021). TILVANCE-301 will evaluate the efficacy and safety of lifileucel plus pembro compared with pembro alone in pts with untreated advanced melanoma. Methods: TILVANCE-301 (NCT05727904) is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel group, treatment study that will randomize ~670 pts (1:1) to either Arm A: lifileucel plus pembro (study intervention includes tumor tissue resection, pembro, nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion [NMA-LD], lifileucel infusion, an abbreviated course of high-dose IL-2, and thereafter, continued pembro) or Arm B: pembro alone. Pts in Arm B who receive pembro and experience confirmed progressive disease verified by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) have the option to receive lifileucel as the immediate next line of treatment. Eligible adults have histologically confirmed advanced melanoma (Stage IIIC, IIID, or IV); ECOG PS of 0 or 1; estimated life expectancy &gt; 6 mo; ≥1 resectable lesion ~1.5 cm in diameter postresection to generate lifileucel and ≥1 measurable lesion (RECIST v1.1); and adequate hematologic parameters and organ function. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment including ICI meeting protocol-specified criteria may be allowed. Exclusion criteria include prior therapy for metastatic disease; symptomatic untreated brain metastases; organ allograft or prior cell transfer therapy; uveal/ocular melanoma; chronic systemic steroid therapy; active systemic infections; cardiovascular, respiratory, or immune system illnesses; primary/acquired immunodeficiency; or other primary malignancy in the last 3 y. The dual primary efficacy endpoints are BIRC-assessed (RECIST v1.1) ORR and PFS. Key secondary efficacy endpoint is OS. Additional secondary efficacy endpoints include BIRC-assessed CR rate, DOR, and EFS; investigator-assessed ORR, PFS, CR rate, DOR, EFS, and PFS2; and safety as characterized by severity and seriousness of TEAEs, and relationship to study drug. The study will enroll globally. Clinical trial information: NCT05727904 .

A randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating abemaciclib in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide in participants with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma.

TPS11580 Background: Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) is the second most common malignant bone tumor affecting children and young adults. Patients with relapsed disease have a poor prognosis and need effective therapies. EWS-FLI1, the most common ES fusion gene (90-95% of cases), is an oncogenic transcription factor that downregulates intrinsic cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, CDKN1A and CDKN1C, which promote cell cycle arrest and upregulates CDK4, which drives entry into the cell cycle. This provides a biological rationale for the clinical evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in ES. Abemaciclib is a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor approved for the treatment of breast cancer. It is approximately 14 times more potent against CDK4/cyclin D1 than CDK6/cyclin D3 in enzymatic assays and has the advantage of continuous dosing schedule without breaks for neutrophil recovery. Abemaciclib is currently also in clinical development for paediatric patients with relapse/refractory solid tumors in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide (JPCS study, NCT04238819). This study, NCT05440786, will evaluate the potential benefit of adding abemaciclib to irinotecan plus temozolomide for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ES. Methods: This randomized, open-label, Phase 2 study is part of the CAMPFIRE master protocol. It is enrolling paediatric and young adult patients (1–39 years) with relapsed/refractory ES or ES-like tumors. Approximately 45 patients will be randomized 2:1 between 2 arms: irinotecan and temozolomide with or without abemaciclib. Stratification factors include age, pulmonary/non-pulmonary site of metastases, and time to recurrence from initial diagnosis. Patients will receive irinotecan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) and temozolomide (100 mg/m2/day orally) on days 1-5. Abemaciclib will be administered orally twice-daily on a continuous 21-day cycle. The abemaciclib dose will be 55mg/m2 BID for patients &lt; 18 years and 100mg BID for those ≥18 years. Besides 25 and 50mg tablets, abemaciclib will be available as 2.5mg granules allowing administration of doses as low as 10mg to patients with a body surface area lower than 0.2m2. Treatment continues until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) determined by a blinded independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, PFS determined by investigator assessment, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Additional analysis includes exploratory biomarker testing. This study is open and actively enrolling in Australia, Europe, Japan, and United States. Clinical trial information: NCT05440786 .

Integrated efficacy and safety of brigatinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive advanced ALK+ NSCLC in the ALTA-1L and J-ALTA studies.

9078 Background: Brigatinib demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naive ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase 3 (ALTA-1L) and phase 2 (J-ALTA) trials. We present results of integrated efficacy and safety analyses of ALTA-1L and J-ALTA. Methods: ALTA-1L (NCT02737501) and J-ALTA (NCT03410108; conducted in Japan) were open-label, multicenter studies in pts with advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. Pts in ALTA-1L and in part 3 of J-ALTA were ALK TKI-naive. Stable or asymptomatic brain metastases were allowed in both studies. Pts received brigatinib 180 mg qd (7-day lead-in at 90 mg). Primary endpoints were blinded independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in ALTA-1L and IRC-assessed 12-month PFS in the J-ALTA ALK TKI-naive cohort (both per RECIST v 1.1). Secondary endpoints included IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, intracranial ORR, intracranial PFS, overall survival, and safety. Pooled efficacy and safety data from both studies are presented. Results: The pooled analysis population included 169 pts (ALTA-1L, N = 137; J-ALTA ALK TKI-naive cohort, N = 32). Median follow-up overall was 35.8 months (last pt last contact: ALTA-1L, January 2021; J-ALTA, July 2021). Most (66%) pts were aged &lt; 65 years, 24% had baseline brain metastases, 95% had stage IV disease at study entry, and 21% had received prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease. With brigatinib treatment, median PFS by IRC was 29.3 months (95% CI, 23.9‒44.7). The confirmed ORR was 79% (95% CI, 72‒85%), with 36 complete responses and 97 partial responses. Median duration of response was 38.1 months (95% CI, 22.9‒not reached). Median overall survival was not reached; the 3-year survival rate was 74% (95% CI: 66‒80%; 84 pts at risk). Intracranial ORR and intracranial PFS will be presented. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 74% of pts; the most common were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (31%), hypertension (18%), and increased lipase (16%). Any grade interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was reported in 12 (7%) of pts. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 11% of pts. Conclusions: Brigatinib treatment demonstrated clinically meaningful systemic and intracranial efficacy in this integrated analysis of pts with ALK TKI-naive advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC in the ALTA-1L or J-ALTA trials. Safety results were consistent with the known profile for brigatinib, with no new safety findings. Clinical trial information: NCT02737501 ; NCT03410108 .

Tislelizumab (TIS) versus sorafenib (SOR) in first-line (1L) treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): The RATIONALE-301 European/North American (EU/NA) subgroup.

4082 Background: HCC is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers globally. Most cases occur in Asia, although a number of patients (pts) are affected in Europe and North America. In the phase 3, open-label RATIONALE-301 trial (NCT03412773), TIS, a PD-1 inhibitor, showed non-inferior overall survival (OS) versus SOR (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.02), and a favorable safety profile, in 1L treatment of pts with unresectable HCC. Here, efficacy and safety of TIS versus SOR in the RATIONALE-301 EU/NA subgroup were compared with the overall population (OP). Methods: Systemic therapy-naïve adults with histologically confirmed HCC were randomized (1:1) to receive TIS (200 mg IV Q3W) or SOR (400 mg orally BID) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR) by blinded independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, and safety. Results: In the EU/NA subgroup (172/674 pts randomized), at data cutoff (July 11, 2022), median (m) OS follow-up was 37.9 months (mo) (TIS) vs 38.5 mo (SOR). At baseline, fewer pts in the EU/NA subgroup had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C disease (70% vs 78%) and extrahepatic spread (51% vs 62%), and more had a non-viral etiology (60% vs 24%) or underlying HCV infection (28% vs 13%) than in the OP, respectively. Distribution of other baseline characteristics was generally similar between the EU/NA subgroup and the OP. Efficacy data in the EU/NA subgroup were consistent with the OP. Numerically longer mOS and mDoR, higher ORR, and similar mPFS were observed with TIS versus SOR in the EU/NA subgroup. In the EU/NA safety population, incidence of ≥grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 46% vs 66%), ≥grade 3 treatment-related TEAEs (TRAEs; 17% vs 50%), and TRAEs leading to discontinuation (9% vs 15%) was lower with TIS versus SOR, respectively, similar to the OP. Conclusions: In the RATIONALE-301 EU/NA subgroup, mOS of TIS was non-inferior versus SOR, consistent with the findings from the OP. Numerically longer mOS and mDoR, and a higher ORR was seen with TIS versus SOR in the EU/NA subgroup, which had a higher rate of pts with non-viral etiology and a slightly lower number of pts with advanced-stage disease (BCLC Stage C) compared with the OP. Clinical trial information: NCT03412773 . [Table: see text]

From ASCEND-5 to ALUR to ALTA-3, an Anti-Climactic End to the Era of Randomized Phase 3 Trials of Next-Generation ALK TKIs in the Crizotinib-Refractory Setting.

The competing roles of various next-generation ALK TKIs in the first and second line treatment setting of advanced ALK+ NSCLC were based on many phase 3 clinical trials in both the first-line and crizotinib-refractory settings. The approval of all next-generation ALK TKIs was first in the crizotinib-refractory setting, based on a large-scale Phase 2 trial, and was then followed by at least one global randomized phase 3 trial comparing to platinum-based chemotherapy (ASCEND-4) or to crizotinib (ALEX, ALTA-1L, eXalt3, CROWN). In addition, three randomized phase 3 trials in the crizotinib-refractory setting were also conducted by next-generation ALK TKIs that were developed earlier before the superiority of next-generation ALK TKIs was demonstrated in order to secure the approval of these ALK TKIs in the crizotinib-refractory setting. These three crizotinib-refractory randomized trials were: ASCEND-5 (ceritinib), ALUR (alectinib), and ALTA-3 (brigatinib). The outcome of the ATLA-3 trial was recently presented closing out the chapter where next-generation ALK TKIs were investigated in the crizotinib-refractory setting as they have replaced crizotinib as the standard of care first-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. This editorial summarizes the results of next-generation ALK TKIs in randomized crizotinib-refractory trials and provides a perspective on how natural history of ALK+ NSCLC may potentially be altered with sequential treatment. ALTA-3 compared brigatinib to alectinib, showing that both achieved near identical blinded independent review committee (BIRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (19.2-19.3 months). Importantly, 4.8% of brigatinib-treated patients developed interstitial lung disease (ILD) while no alectinib-treated patients developed ILD. Dose reduction and discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events were 21% and 5%, respectively, for brigatinib-treated patients compared to 11% and 2%, respectively, for alectinib-treated patients. Upon analysis of these findings, we speculate that brigatinib may have a diminishing role in the treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

Abstract CT048: A Phase II trial of JDQ443 in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC with PD-L1 expression &amp;lt;1% or PD-L1 expression≥1% and an STK11 co-mutation

Abstract Background Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS G12C, the most frequent KRAS variant, is found in ~13% of patients (pts) with NSCLC. KRAS is a GTPase that regulates cell signaling pathways necessary for proliferation, differentiation, and survival. KRAS mutation reduces the intrinsic GTPase activity of the enzyme, allowing for the accumulation of active, GTP-bound KRAS and hyperactivation of downstream signaling, driving tumorigenesis. JDQ443 is a potent, selective KRASG12C inhibitor that irreversibly traps KRASG12C in its inactive, GDP bound state and blocks downstream signaling. In preliminary data from the Phase Ib part of the KontRASt-01 study (NCT04699188), JDQ443 showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in previously treated pts with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC. Pts with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC currently receive the same first-line (1L) treatment as those without driver mutations, consisting of immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy; however, ~30% of pts with NSCLC present with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression &amp;lt;1%, and ~10-20% of pts harbor an STK11 mutation, both indicators of poor response to immunotherapy. Therefore, alternative 1L treatment options are needed for these pts. Of note, PD-L1 expression and STK11 mutation do not affect responsiveness to KRASG12C inhibitors, raising interest in the evaluation of these targeted therapies as 1L alternatives to immunotherapy for pts with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. Methods KontRASt-06 (NCT05445843) is an open-label, Phase II, single-arm, multicenter study evaluating JDQ443 monotherapy (200 mg JDQ443 twice daily in 21-day cycles) as a 1L treatment for two cohorts of adult pts with locally advanced or metastatic, KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. Cohort A (n=90) includes pts whose tumors have PD-L1 expression &amp;lt;1%, regardless of STK11 mutation status, while Cohort B (n=30) includes pts whose tumors have PD-L1 expression ≥1% and an STK11 co-mutation. Local testing for PD-L1 status and KRAS and STK11 mutations is accepted; KRAS and STK11 mutations may be assessed in blood samples. A tissue sample is required for retrospective biomarker status confirmation and exploratory study. The study is currently enrolling pts into both cohorts. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1, assessed by a blinded independent review committee, in Cohort A. Key secondary endpoints are ORR in Cohort B and duration of response in both cohorts. Other secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pt-reported outcomes. A comprehensive biomarker strategy aims to investigate predictors of treatment response and resistance in the study population. Citation Format: Colin R. Lindsay, Daniel Tan, Shweta Malhotra, Rafael Caparica, Aislyn D. Boran, Gilberto Castro, Sabine Glaser, Rajwanth R. Veluswamy, Enriqueta Felip. A Phase II trial of JDQ443 in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC with PD-L1 expression &amp;lt;1% or PD-L1 expression≥1% and an STK11 co-mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT048.