WHILE the specific literary connection between Blickling Homily XVII and Beowulf is often noted and well discussed, there has been some recent debate regarding the possibility of a codicological relationship between the two manuscripts.1 There are general paleographical similarities, namely a broad resemblance of a hand in each manuscript (as noted by Max Förster2) and the two manuscripts’ peculiar paleographical situation of having what appears to be a late tenth-century hand working contemporarily with an early eleventh-century hand,3 but the evidence of scripts alone does not make the case, and Kevin Kiernan's argument for the possibility of a link between the two manuscripts has been queried accordingly.4 However, an examination of codicological details—gatherings, arrangement, ruling, etc.—of a wider range of books suggests that the question of a shared origin for the Beowulf and Blickling manuscripts ought to remain open. Kiernan calls attention to physical similarities in the construction of the two manuscripts. As N. R. Ker describes, the fire-damaged Beowulf has leaves of c. 195 × 115–30 mm, with a written space, or grid, of c. 175 × 105 mm, ruled for 20 long lines in most quires, 21 lines in three quires, and 22 lines in one, with single bounding lines.5 Similarly, Blickling has leaves of c. 200 × 145 mm and a written space of 180 × 108 mm, and is ruled for 21 lines of text, with some sides bearing an extra unruled twenty-second line of text, with double bounding lines.6Beowulf is constructed mainly in quires of eight with two quires of ten (possibly with some other irregular quires),7 and while most of the quires in the manuscript are regularly arranged hair facing hair and flesh facing flesh, in the first quire and in all of scribe B's quires, all leaves are arranged hair-side out, while some others are irregular. In Blickling, the quires are of two, four, six, eight, and ten, usually with hair-side out, and yet there are several that vary from this practice, including one with all flesh-sides out, and other irregularities.8 However, Blickling seems to have been constructed using quire signatures, which remain extant or in traces at the bottom centre of the last verso in many quires. The Beowulf manuscript does not bear quire signatures. Thus, both manuscripts are similarly unconventional and inconsistent in physical structure, even as they both present very similar page sizes, writing grids, and ruling patterns, though differing in bounding lines and quire signatures.