166 Michigan Historical Review Lewis A. Erenberg. The Greatest Fight ofOur Generation: Louis vs. Schmeling. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 288. Illustrations. Index. Notes. Paper, $15.95. After the Brown Bomber's crushing victory over the Black Uhlan of the Rhine in their notorious two-minute, four-second 1938 bout for the tide "Heavy Weight Champion of the World," the African American leader Marcus Garvey reported that Joe Louis carried the future of his race "upon his shoulders." Although Schmehng's ignominious defeat garnered no such pronouncements, as the exemplar of Nazi power and physical potency, he had entered the ring with a weight equally as daunting: Adolph Hider's vision of Aryan supremacy and the fate of wounded yet rebounding German pride and manhood. In The Greatest Tight of Our Generation: Louis vs. Schmeling, Lewis A. Erenberg paints a vivid and compelling portrait of the matches, professional careers, and intertwining hves of these two seemingly disparate, yet surprisingly similar world-class pugilists and situates both men upon the larger-than life stage of international politics. Beginning with accounts of each fighter's early hfe, The Greatest Tight chronicles the triumphs and tribulations of the two contenders from the Great Depression to their career-defining match and rematch, their parallel formations as Nazi and Democratic icons during World War II, their postwar self-reinventions, and the longtime foes' eventual reconciliation. Deftly synthesizing the numerous extant works, biographies, and autobiographies with additional sources, including American and German boxing magazines and African American newspapers, Erenberg drives his narrative forward to the climactic fight of a generation and brings the world of professional boxing vividly to hfe. Likewise, he highhghts the similarities between the white, middle class German, and the black, working-class American, and pays particular attention to the role of the media and the agendas of the German and American governments. He effectively argues that both men were transformed from professional athletes into national heroes on the eve of World War II and adroidy exploits the rich opportunity to delve into questions of race, masculinity, national identity, and international politics within the Louis-Schmeling drama. Erenberg sk?lfully evaluates the importance of race and racism; yet he does not pay sufficient attention to the African American cultural and political agitation that helped set the stage for Louis's ascent. Viewing Louis's emergence first as an African American icon and then as a mainstream American democratic icon as two distinct events, he partially Book Reviews 167 divorces the fighter from the "upsurge of black political and cultural activity" during the 1930s (p. 182). Ultimately, the greatest strength of this work is Erenberg's insightful analysis of the international dimensions of Louis and Schmeling, which illustrates the reciprocal impact of national race relations and international affairs. The Greatest Fight ofOur Generation is informative, persuasive, and best of all, a great read. Laurie A. Woodard Yale University Paul Finkelman and Martin J. Hershock, eds. The History of Michigan Law. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2006. Pp. 304. Bibliography. Index. Notes. Cloth, $49.95. This book presents twelve essays on the legal traditions of a state that is, as the introduction notes, unlike its midwestern neighbors. Though the tide implies that the volume might be a dry summary of important decisions couched in dense legal jargon, readers will find that this is not the case. Organized in roughly chronological order, the essays range across many subjects, including labor law, constitutional changes, gender equity, civil rights, the tensions involved in adapting to free market capitalism, the legacy of the Northwest Ordinance, the abolition of the death penalty, temperance, the use and misuse of the environment, and the complex underpinnings and transformation of Michigan's legal-education system. Each essay offers a concise survey of the historical contexts that shaped the major legal and legislative decisions involved in the discussion. With a jurisprudence rooted in New England and New York, Michigan estabhshed a legal tradition quite different from that of Indiana and Illinois, whose traditions were shaped by a strong southern influence. Those states struggled to deal with the segregationist and precedent-dominated frameworks that would eventually stir conflict as the nineteenth century progressed. The...
Read full abstract