Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis Research Articles

Diagnostic value of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality score for bone mineral density assessment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Many studies have explored the application of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening before spine surgery. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to determine the diagnostic value of the VBQ score for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. The PubMed, EBSCO, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical databases were searched to retrieve original studies on VBQ and BMD published from inception to 31 December 2023 with no restrictions on language and the reference standard of BMD. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Summary accuracy metrics were obtained by bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the VBQ score. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the source of heterogeneity. In total, 23 studies, comprising 2981 patients, from 2022 to 2023, of high- or medium-to-high scientific quality were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the VBQ score in the assessment of BMD were 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.81; P<0.001], 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71; P<0.001), and 6.49 (95% CI, 4.82-8.73; P<0.001), respectively, with an area under the SROC curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82; P<0.001). The presence of heterogeneity was found to have a significant association with factors such as the reference standard, sex, mean age, region of publication, VBQ method, and magnet field strength. The MRI-based VBQ score has some diagnostic value in detecting osteoporosis. The VBQ score could be used as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening before spine surgery.

Diagnostic Performance of TOF, 4D MRA, Arterial Spin-Labeling, and Susceptibility-Weighted Angiography Sequences in the Post-Radiosurgery Monitoring of Brain AVMs.

Brain AVMs are congenital anomalies of the cerebrovascular system, often discovered incidentally or through symptomatic presentations such as intracranial hemorrhage, seizure, headache, or neurologic deficits. Various treatment modalities exist for AVMs, including radiosurgery, a treatment technique that is noninvasive and efficient. Accurate imaging is crucial for risk assessment, treatment planning, and monitoring of these patients before and after radiosurgery. Currently, DSA is the preferred imaging technique. Despite its efficacy, DSA is notably invasive, presenting inherent risks to the patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MRI sequences for monitoring brain AVMs after radiosurgery. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases and a methodologic quality assessment with the QUADAS-2 checklist diagnostic test accuracy. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 3,220 abstracts were screened, 98 articles were reviewed in full text, and 14 articles met the inclusion criteria. We used the bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model with STATA/MP 17 software for data analysis. No publication bias was detected. Fourteen studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative analysis. MRI offers high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (99%) in detecting residual AVMs. Different MRI sequences, including 3D TOF-MRA, 4D MRA, and arterial spin-labeling (ASL) demonstrated varying diagnostic accuracies with areas under the curve of 0.92, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively. 4D MRA had a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 99%, ASL showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92%, while 3D TOF-MRA had 90% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Meta-regression did not fully explain the sources of heterogeneity. Only 1 study assessed the susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) method, and most studies involved small participant groups with varied MR techniques and sequences. Additionally, the retrospective nature of most studies may introduce bias, warranting cautious interpretation of the results. MRI sequences show acceptable diagnostic performance in postradiosurgery monitoring of brain AVMs, with ASL and 4D MRA showing acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Combining different MRI sequences may further enhance diagnostic reliability. However, further investigation is needed to assess whether MRI sequences can serve as a feasible substitute for DSA, considering their risk-benefit profile, with the potential to establish them as the recommended standard.

Termination of Resuscitation Rules and Survival Among Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Termination of resuscitation (TOR) rules may help guide prehospital decisions to stop resuscitation, with potential effects on patient outcomes and health resource use. Rules with high sensitivity risk increasing inappropriate transport of nonsurvivors, while rules without excellent specificity risk missed survivors. Further examination of the performance of TOR rules in estimating survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is needed. To determine whether TOR rules can accurately identify patients who will not survive an OHCA. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from database inception up to January 11, 2024. There were no restrictions on language, publication date, or time frame of the study. Two reviewers independently screened records, first by title and abstract and then by full text. Randomized clinical trials, case-control studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, retrospective analyses, and modeling studies were included. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were reviewed to identify primary studies. Studies predicting outcomes other than death, in-hospital studies, animal studies, and non-peer-reviewed studies were excluded. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Two reviewers assessed risk of bias using the Revised Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Cochrane Screening and Diagnostic Tests Methods Group recommendations were followed when conducting a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) statement and is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019131010). Sensitivity and specificity tables with 95% CIs and bivariate summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were produced. Estimates of effects at different prevalence levels were calculated. These estimates were used to evaluate the practical implications of TOR rule use at different prevalence levels. This review included 43 nonrandomized studies published between 1993 and 2023, addressing 29 TOR rules and involving 1 125 587 cases. Fifteen studies reported the derivation of 20 TOR rules. Thirty-three studies reported external data validations of 17 TOR rules. Seven TOR rules had data to facilitate meta-analysis. One clinical study was identified. The universal termination of resuscitation rule had the best performance, with pooled sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.71), pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.94), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 20.45 (95% CI, 13.15-31.83). In this review, there was insufficient robust evidence to support widespread implementation of TOR rules in clinical practice. These findings suggest that adoption of TOR rules may lead to missed survivors and increased resource utilization.

Evaluating CR as a surrogate endpoint for PFS in R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL): A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).

7046 Background: CLL/SLL is the most common leukemia in adults. Achieving a CR by International Workshop on CLL 2018 criteria indicates complete eradication of CLL/SLL in all disease compartments. Patients with R/R CLL/SLL who achieved CR tend to have delayed disease progression/death compared with patients who did not achieve CR. This is the first report to evaluate CR as a surrogate endpoint for PFS in R/R CLL/SLL using aggregate RCT data. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) identified published RCTs in R/R CLL/SLL from inception to 10/2023, reporting nonzero CR rates (CRR) and PFS. Association between treatment effects on CR and PFS across RCTs was estimated using a weighted linear model (WLM) in the primary analysis, and Daniels and Hughes (D&amp;H) and Riley bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (BRMA) in sensitivity analyses. Strength of association was assessed based on surrogacy criteria described by D&amp;H. Predictive performance of models was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: The SLR identified 13 RCTs with a total of 4388 patients with R/R CLL/SLL treated with a variety of therapies, including but not limited to BTKi, BCL2i, PI3Ki, CAR T cell therapy, anti-CD20 mAb, and chemotherapy. Across the evidence base, CRR ranged from 0.48% to 38.10% and median PFS was between 1 and 35.9 months (excluding unreached medians). Across RCTs, contrasting treatment and control arms, higher odds of CR resulted in lower hazards of disease progression/death (CRR improvement translated to PFS benefit). D&amp;H surrogacy criteria were met for WLM: 1) a near-zero, statistically nonsignificant intercept, indicating that no treatment effect on CRR implies no effect on PFS; 2) a negative, statistically significant slope, suggesting that improved CRR correlates with longer PFS; and 3) a near-zero conditional variance, meaning that PFS HR variation was primarily explained by CR odds ratio. During cross-validation, treatment effects on CR were predictive of PFS benefits, as the 95% predictive interval of PFS HR contained the observed HR in all RCTs for WLM. Results were largely consistent across all 3 models(Table). Conclusions: Improved CRR corresponds to prolonged PFS across RCTs and treatment comparisons. The results support CRR as an important treatment goal for R/R CLL/SLL and a valid surrogate endpoint. Consistent results and predictive performance across different models indicate the robustness of the results. [Table: see text]

Accuracy of Salivary Circulating Tumor Human Papillomavirus DNA in Detecting Oropharyngeal Cancer

Circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPV DNA) has shown potential as a biomarker capable of improving outcomes in patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal (OP) cancer. It can be isolated from plasma or saliva, with the latter offering reduced invasiveness and theoretic reduction of lead time. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the accuracy of salivary ctHPV DNA for detecting HPV-associated OP cancer. Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through October 2023. All patients who underwent salivary ctHPV DNA testing at presentation for possible or diagnosed HPV-related OP cancer were included. Non-English and review publications were excluded. Two authors independently voted on article inclusion with a third resolving conflicting votes. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, multiple authors independently abstracted data and assessed bias of included articles. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was performed with I2 to assess for study heterogeneity. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% CIs alongside area under the curve (AUC) of a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated. The initial analysis took place throughout December 2023. Of 440 initially identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria and demonstrated moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 36%) with low risk of bias and low applicability concerns. Overall, 263 total patients were included with a median (range) age of 58 (39-86) years, and 228 (87%) were male patients. Per updated prognostic staging criteria, localized tumors (ie, stages 1 or 2) comprised most cancers at 139 (77%), whereas advanced ones (ie, stages 3 or 4) comprised the remaining 41 (23%). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR values were 64% (95% CI, 36%-85%), 89% (95% CI, 46%-99%), 11.70 (95% CI, 0.37-77.00), 1.21 (95% CI, 0.08-7.00), and 139.00 (95% CI, 0.05-837.00), respectively. The AUC of the SROC curve was 0.80. This study supports salivary ctHPV DNA as an acceptably specific test in detecting HPV-associated OP cancer that would benefit from testing in clinical trials prior to real-time implementation.

Diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening tools validated for older adults in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening tools validated for older adults in Iran, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinicians and researchers.MethodsA comprehensive search in March 2023 across Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SID, IranMedex, and IranDoc, enhanced by hand-searching references and Google Scholar, identified cross-sectional studies on cognitive screening in Iranian seniors. We assessed diagnostic accuracy, cognitive domains, and test strengths and weaknesses. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis provided summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals, illustrated in forest plots.ResultsOur review, derived from an initial screening of 38 articles, focused on 17 studies involving 14 cognitive screening tools and participant counts from 60 to 350, mostly from specialized clinics. The MMSE was the only tool examined in at least three studies, prompting a meta-analysis revealing its sensitivity at 0.89 and specificity at 0.77 for dementia detection, albeit amidst significant heterogeneity (I^2 > 80%). ACE-III demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for MCI and dementia, while MoCA’s performance was deemed adequate for MCI and excellent for dementia. High bias risk in studies limits interpretation.ConclusionThis review identifies key cognitive tools for dementia and MCI in Iranian older adults, tailored to educational levels for use in primary and specialized care. It emphasizes the need for further validation to enhance diagnostic precision across diverse settings, within a concise framework prioritizing brevity and accuracy for clinical applicability.

CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts periprocedural complications and mortality of percutaneous coronary intervention irrespective of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Periprocedural complications of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) are dreaded as they negatively impact prognosis, but they are hard to predict especially in resource-limited settings. CHA2DS2-VASc Score, apart from predicting thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation, has been reported to be associated with several complications of PCI. Purpose We aimed to assess the predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score for periprocedural complications and mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients treated with PCI. Methods Systematic search of the literature was conducted through Pubmed and Embase for all articles published from inception until 24th September 2023. Studies were included if they were observational studies conducted in ACS patients who received PCI during index hospital stay and evaluated the value of CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict at least one outcome of interest. Studies were excluded if they only used modified CHA2DS2-VASc score or did not conduct a separate analysis for ACS patients. Results Out of 1,783 manually reviewed unique studies, 34 studies involving a total of 342,141 ACS patients were included. Only 2 studies exclusively included patients with atrial fibrillation. Random effect meta-analyses found a significant association between high CHA2DS2-VASc score and Contrast-Induced Nephropathy/CIN (11 studies; OR 5.35; 95%CI 3.56–8.03; I2=94%), no-reflow phenomenon (14 studies; OR 3.21; 95%CI 2.20–4.68; I2 = 91%), acute stent thrombosis (3 studies; OR 5.23; 95%CI 3.85–7.10; I2=0%), in-hospital all-cause mortality (9 studies; OR 3.25; 95%CI 1.65–6.44; I2=91%), in-hospital cardiovascular mortality (3 studies; 3.05; 95%CI 1.58–5.87; I2=38%), post-discharge all-cause mortality (4 studies; 3.35; 95%CI 2.24–5.02; I2=0%), and post-discharge cardiovascular mortality (3 studies; 3.65; 95%CI 2.65–5.01; I2=35%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score cut-off with the highest OR for each outcome was used in bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model for diagnostic test accuracy. CHA2DS2-VASc score cut-off of ≥4 is a good predictor of CIN/AKI (5 studies) with AUC 0.81 (0.77–0.84), sensitivity 0.70 (0.51–0.84), specificity of 0.81 (0.54–0.94), while CHA2DS2-VASc score cut-off of ≥2 is good for screening no-reflow phenomenon (5 studies) with AUC 0.70 (0.66–0.74), sensitivity 0.86 (0.56–0.97), specificity 0.44 (0.20–0.71), and for screening in-hospital all-cause mortality (5 studies) with AUC 0.77 (0.73–0.81), sensitivity 0.88 (0.77–0.94), and specificity 0.35 (0.19–0.55). Conclusion CHA2DS2-VASc score is a rapid, non-invasive, and easily measurable tool that provides a good prediction of CIN/AKI, as well as a useful screening tool for no-reflow phenomenon and in-hospital all-cause mortality in ACS patients who received PCI regardless of their atrial fibrillation diagnosis.CHA2DS2-VASc score cut-off 4 for CIN/AKICHA2DS2-VASc cut-off 2 for no-reflow

Diagnostic accuracy of serological and imaging tests used in surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with cirrhosis: a systematic review protocol.

Liver cirrhosis is the largest risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and surveillance is therefore recommended among this population. Current guidance recommends surveillance with ultrasound, with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). This review is part of a larger project looking at benefits, harms and costs of surveillance for HCC in people with cirrhosis. It aims to synthesise the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging or biomarker tests, alone or in combination, to identify HCC in adults with liver cirrhosis in a surveillance programme. We will identify studies through a 2021 Cochrane review with similar eligibility criteria, and a database search of MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We will include diagnostic test accuracy studies with adult cirrhosis patients of any aetiology. Studies must assess at least one of the following index tests: ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerised tomography (CT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP), lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3), a genomic biomarker, or a diagnostic prediction model incorporating at least one of the above-mentioned tests. We will assess studies for risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C. We will combine data using bivariate random effects meta-analyses. For tests evaluated across varying diagnostic thresholds, we will produce pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity across the full range of numerical thresholds, where possible. Where sufficient studies compare two or more index tests, we will perform additional analyses to compare the accuracy of different tests. Where feasible, we will stratify all meta-analyses by tumour size and patient characteristics, including cirrhosis aetiology and liver disease severity. This review will synthesise evidence across the full range of possible surveillance tests, using advanced statistical methods to summarise accuracy across all thresholds and to compare the accuracy of different tests. CRD42022357163.

Accuracy of heart failure ascertainment using routinely collected healthcare data: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAscertainment of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in cardiovascular trials is costly and complex, involving processes that could be streamlined by using routinely collected healthcare data (RCD). The utility of coded RCD for HF outcome ascertainment in randomized trials requires assessment. We systematically reviewed studies assessing RCD-based HF outcome ascertainment against “gold standard” (GS) methods to study the feasibility of using such methods in clinical trials.MethodsStudies assessing International Classification of Disease (ICD) coded RCD-based HF outcome ascertainment against GS methods and reporting at least one agreement statistic were identified by searching MEDLINE and Embase from inception to May 2021. Data on study characteristics, details of RCD and GS data sources and definitions, and test statistics were reviewed. Summary sensitivities and specificities for studies ascertaining acute and prevalent HF were estimated using a bivariate random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves.ResultsA total of 58 studies of 48,643 GS-adjudicated HF events were included in this review. Strategies used to improve case identification included the use of broader coding definitions, combining multiple data sources, and using machine learning algorithms to search free text data, but these methods were not always successful and at times reduced specificity in individual studies. Meta-analysis of 17 acute HF studies showed that RCD algorithms have high specificity (96.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.5–98.3), but lacked sensitivity (63.5%, 95% CI 51.3–74.1) with similar results for 21 prevalent HF studies. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies.ConclusionsRCD can correctly identify HF outcomes but may miss approximately one-third of events. Methods used to improve case identification should also focus on minimizing false positives.

Diagnostic accuracy of serological rk-39 test for visceral Leishmaniasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), or kala-azar, is a vector-borne tropical disease caused by a group of intracellular hemoflagellate protozoa belonging to the family of Trypanosomatide and the genus Leishmania. The disease is distributed around the world and transmitted via the bite of infected female Phlebotomine sandflies, and there is variation in the diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled global sensitivity and specificity of the rk-39 test and to evaluate if there is a difference between the different parts of the world. A systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. After setting eligibility criteria, literature was searched in four databases and one searching engine. Articles were screened, critically appraised, and extracted independently by two reviewers, and any disagreements were resolved with the involvement of a third person. The quality of the included studies had been assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS 2) tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined by bivariate random effect analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins's I2, and when it was present, mitigation was conducted by using sensitivity analysis. A total of 409 studies were identified, and finally 18 articles were eligible for the review with a total sample size of 5, 253. The bivariate random effect meta-analysis of the 7 diagnostic accuracy studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (0.76-0.95) and specificity of 0.86 (0.72-0.94). The +LR was 6.32 (95% CI: 2.85-14.02), the-LR was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.06-0.30), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 47.8 (95% CI: 11.3-203.2). Abdel-Latif (2018) was both an outlier and influential for sensitivity, and Walter (2011) was both an outlier and influential for specificity, and removing them from sensitivity and specificity, respectively, was beneficial for reducing the heterogeneity. Rk-39 is found to have highly accurate measures in the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Both sensitivity and specificity were found to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.91 (0.88-0.93) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (0.85-0.91). As we will use secondary data for the systematic review and meta-analysis, ethical concerns are not necessary.

Self-tests for COVID-19: What is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023).

COVID-19 self-testing strategy (COVIDST) can rapidly identify symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals and their contacts, potentially reducing transmission. In this living systematic review, we evaluated the evidence for real-world COVIDST performance. Two independent reviewers searched six databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, World Health Organization database, Cochrane COVID-19 registry, Europe PMC) for the period April 1st, 2020, to January 18th, 2023. Data on studies evaluating COVIDST against laboratory-based conventional testing and reported on diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, impact, and qualitative outcomes were abstracted. Bivariate random effects meta-analyses of COVIDST accuracy were performed (n = 14). Subgroup analyses (by sampling site, symptomatic/asymptomatic infection, supervised/unsupervised strategy, with/without digital supports) were conducted. Data from 70 included studies, conducted across 25 countries with a median sample size of 817 (range: 28-784,707) were pooled. Specificity and DOR was high overall, irrespective of subgroups (98.37-99.71%). Highest sensitivities were reported for: a) symptomatic individuals (73.91%, 95%CI: 68.41-78.75%; n = 9), b) mid-turbinate nasal samples (77.79%, 95%CI: 56.03-90.59%; n = 14), c) supervised strategy (86.67%, 95%CI: 59.64-96.62%; n = 13), and d) use of digital interventions (70.15%, 95%CI: 50.18-84.63%; n = 14). Lower sensitivity was attributed to absence of symptoms, errors in test conduct and absence of supervision or a digital support. We found no difference in COVIDST sensitivity between delta and omicron pre-dominant period. Digital supports increased confidence in COVIDST reporting and interpretation (n = 16). Overall acceptability was 91.0-98.7% (n = 2) with lower acceptability reported for daily self-testing (39.5-51.1%). Overall feasibility was 69.0-100.0% (n = 5) with lower feasibility (35.9-64.6%) for serial self-testing. COVIDST decreased closures in school, workplace, and social events (n = 4). COVIDST is an effective rapid screening strategy for home-, workplace- or school-based screening, for symptomatic persons, and for preventing transmission during outbreaks. These data will guide COVIDST policy. Our review demonstrates that COVIDST has paved the way for self-testing in pandemics worldwide.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detection of Perineural Spread in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for the detection of perineural spread (PNS) in head and neck cancer patients. Methods A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to May 20, 2022. We included diagnostic accuracy studies that used CE-MRI for the diagnosis of PNS in patients with head and neck cancer, using histopathology from surgical specimens as the reference standard. Potential bias and applicability of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADUS-2) tool. Pooled joint effect sizes of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by applying bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model. Results Nine studies with 259 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRI for detecting PNS were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73-96) and 83% (95% CI: 73-90), respectively. Stratifying by MRI strength, 1.5 T had a higher sensitivity of 97% (95% CI: 47-100) compared with 3 T, which had a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 72-90). Both 1.5- and 3-T MRI had a similar specificity in detecting PNS of 85% (95% CI: 63-95) and 84% (95% CI: 75-91), respectively. Conclusions CE-MRI provides good diagnostic test accuracy for the detection of PNS in head and neck cancer. Current evidence suggests 1.5-T MRI provides greater sensitivity compared with 3-T MRI.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in relation to salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

To evaluate the accuracy of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in relation to minor salivary gland biopsy (mSGB) in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome (SS). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Ten databases were searched to identify studies that compared the accuracy of SGUS and mSGB. The risk of bias was assessed, data were extracted, and univariate and bivariate random-effects meta-analyses were done. A total of 5000 records were identified; 13 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 10 in the quantitative synthesis. The first meta-analysis found a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92) for the predictive value of SGUS scoring in relation to the result of mSGB. In the second meta-analysis, mSGB showed higher sensitivity and specificity than SGUS. Sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85) for mSGB and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.81) for SGUS, and specificity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97) for mSGB and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) for SGUS. The diagnostic accuracy of SGUS was similar to that of mSGB. SGUS is an effective diagnostic test that shows good sensitivity and high specificity, in addition to being a good tool for prognosis and for avoiding unnecessary biopsies. More studies using similar methodologies are needed to assess the accuracy of SGUS in predicting the result of mSGB. Our results will contribute to decision-making for the implementation of SGUS as a diagnostic tool for SS, considering the advantages of this method.

Diagnostic accuracy of RBC scintigraphy and CTA for detection of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) through noninvasive modalities is very important in the successful management of LGIB. RBC scintigraphy and CT have a role in the detection of LGIB and guiding the management of patient by localization of the bleeding site. However, only a small number of studies have evaluated the role of RBC scintigraphy and CT in the diagnosis of LGIB. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of RBC scintigraphy and CT in the detection of LGIB in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious of LGIB. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant keywords, and articles published through 30 April 2022, were included. Using endoscopy or surgical outcomes as the reference standard, the numbers of true and false positives and true and false negatives were extracted. Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy - including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and summary ROC (SROC) curve - were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Three studies comprising 171 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the detection of LGIB using RBC scintigraphy were 0.787 (95% CI, 0.643-0.893), 0.289 (95% CI, 0.164-0.443), 1.214 (95% CI, 0.923-1.597) and 0.576 (95% CI, 0.296-1.121) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.73. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the detection of LGIB using CT were 0.931 (95% CI, 0.772-0.992), 0.870 (95% CI, 0.737-0.951), 6.085 (95% CI, 0.840-44.097), 0.126 (95% CI, 0.006-2.509) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.095. RBC scintigraphy has overall good sensitivity and CTA has excellent sensitivity specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio in the detection of LGIB in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious for LGIB.CTA along with RBC scintigraphy can be used algorithmically to rule out patients who do not have a localization for the site of LGIB thereby helping these patients to avoid invasive procedures like endoscopy or surgical explorations.

Diagnostic value of the cerebrospinal fluid lipoarabinomannan assay for tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lipoarabinomannan (LAM) assays in detecting tuberculous meningitis (TBM). A systematic review search was conducted in PubMed and five other databases up to April 2023. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CSF LAM assays were included with either definitive or composite reference standard used as the preferred reference standard. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and calculated the summary diagnostic statistics. A total of six studies, including a sample size of 999, were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CSF LAM for diagnosing TBM were determined to be 0.44 (95% CI: 0.31-0.58), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93), and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.80), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed in both sensitivity (Q = 73.82, p < 0.01; I2 = 86.45, 95%CI: 79.64-93.27) and specificity (Q = 95.34, p < 0.01; I2 = 89.51, 95% CI: 84.61-94.42). Regression analysis indicated that the study design (retrospective vs. prospective) was associated with the heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity and specificity (all p < 0.05). Although more prospective studies are required to validate the role of the CSF LAM assay, current evidence supports that the performance of the CSF LAM assay is unsatisfactory for the TBM diagnosis. Additionally, the optimization of the CSF LAM assay (e.g., improvements in CSF collection and preparation methods) should be considered to improve its performance.

Diagnostic accuracy of Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire by participant and informant-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire (AD8) is a screening tool for cognitive impairment that can be administered to older persons and/or their informants. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and compare the predictive parameters of the informant and participant-completed Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire (iAD8 and pAD8, respectively) in older adults with cognitive impairment. We searched ten electronic databases (including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase) from tool inception to March 2022. We included studies with patients ≥60 years old that were screened for cognitive impairment using AD8 in any healthcare setting. Predictive parameters were assessed against reference standards to estimate accuracy and diagnostic ability using bivariate random-effects meta-analyses. We used QUADAS-2 criteria to assess risk of bias. A cut-off of ≥2/8 was used to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI), dementia, and cognitive impairment (MCI or dementia). Seven studies using the iAD8 (n = 794) showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 79% to detect MCI. Nine studies using the iAD8 (n = 2393) established 91% sensitivity and 64% specificity to detect dementia. To detect MCI using the pAD8, four studies (n = 836) showed 57% sensitivity and 71% specificity. To detect dementia using the pAD8, four studies (n = 3015) demonstrated 82% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Recurring high or unclear risk of bias was noted in the domains of "Index test" and "reference standard". The diagnostic accuracy of iAD8 is superior to that of pAD8 when screening for cognitive impairment. The AD8 may be an acceptable alternative to screen for cognitive impairment in older adults when there are limitations to formal testing.

Optimal cut-off MoCA score for screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate the optimal cut-off MoCA score for elderly individuals with MCI. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and CQVIP and were assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Figures of the assessment were made by using Review Manager 5.3, and a meta-analysis of the data was conducted by using Bivariate Random-effects Meta-Analysis (BRMA) via Stata 14.0. Seventeen articles were retrieved from the database, and when the cut-offs were 24/25 and 25/26, they represented the same diagnostic value; in addition, the AUC was 0.96, which demonstrated high predictive validity for mild cognitive impairment screening. However, the sensitivity was higher with 25/26 (se=0.95, sp=0.80), whereas the specificity was higher with 24/25 (se=0.92, sp=0.89).

Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling tests for detecting endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of different endometrial sampling tests for detecting endometrial carcinoma.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy.Data sourcesCochrane Library, MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and...

MRI vs. CT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma vascular invasion: comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.

To perform a systematic review comparing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI vs. CT for assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) vascular invasion. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Scopus were searched until December 2021 for diagnostic accuracy studies comparing MRI vs. CT to evaluate vascular invasion of pathologically confirmed PDAC in the same patients. Findings on resection or exploratory laparotomy were the preferred reference standard. Data extraction, risk of bias, and applicability assessment were performed by two authors using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative Tool. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Three studies were included assessing 474 vessels without vascular invasion and 65 with vascular invasion in 107 patients. All patients were imaged using MRI at ≥ 1.5T and a pancreatic protocol CT. No difference was shown between MRI and CT for diagnosing PDAC vascular invasion: MRI/CT sensitivity (95% CI) were 71% (47-87%)/74% (56-86%), and specificity were 97% (94-99%)/97% (94-98%). Sources of bias included selection bias from only a subset of CT patients undergoing MRI and verification bias from patients with unresectable disease not confirmed on surgery. No patients received neoadjuvant therapy prior to staging. Based on limited data, no difference was observed between MRI and pancreatic protocol CT for PDAC vascular invasion assessment. MRI may be an adequate substitute for pancreatic protocol CT in some patients, particularly those who have already had a single-phase CT. Larger and more recent cohort studies at low risk of bias, including patients who have received neoadjuvant therapy, are needed. Abdominal MRI performed similarly to pancreatic protocol CT at assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma vascular invasion, suggesting local staging is adequate in some patients using MRI. More data are needed using larger, more recent cohorts including patients with neoadjuvant treatment. • Based on limited data, no difference was found between MRI and pancreatic protocol CT sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PDAC vascular invasion (p = 0.81, 0.73 respectively). • Risk of bias could be reduced in future PDAC MRI vs CT comparative diagnostic test accuracy research by ensuring all enrolled patients undergo both imaging modalities being compared in random order and regardless of the findings on either modality. • More studies are needed that directly compare the diagnostic performance of MRI and CT for PDAC staging after neoadjuvant therapy.

Image analysis of cutaneous melanoma histology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The current subjective histopathological assessment of cutaneous melanoma is challenging. The application of image analysis algorithms to histological images may facilitate improvements in workflow and prognostication. To date, several individual algorithms applied to melanoma histological images have been reported with variations in approach and reported accuracies. Histological digital images can be created using a camera mounted on a light microscope, or through whole slide image (WSI) generation using a whole slide scanner. Before any such tool could be integrated into clinical workflow, the accuracy of the technology should be carefully evaluated and summarised. Therefore, the objective of this review was to evaluate the accuracy of existing image analysis algorithms applied to digital histological images of cutaneous melanoma.Database searching of PubMed and Embase from inception to 11th March 2022 was conducted alongside citation checking and examining reports from organisations. All studies reporting accuracy of any image analysis applied to histological images of cutaneous melanoma, were included. The reference standard was any histological assessment of haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and/or immunohistochemical staining. Citations were independently deduplicated and screened by two review authors and disagreements were resolved through discussion. The data was extracted concerning study demographics; type of image analysis; type of reference standard; conditions included and test statistics to construct 2 × 2 tables. Data was extracted in accordance with our protocol and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) Statement. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Assessment of methodological quality was conducted using a tailored version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The primary outcome was the pooled sensitivity and specificity of image analysis applied to cutaneous melanoma histological images. Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review, representing 4,888 specimens. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean sensitivity and specificity of automated image analysis algorithms applied to melanoma histological images was 90% (CI 82%, 95%) and 92% (CI 79%, 97%), respectively. Based on limited and heterogeneous data, image analysis appears to offer high accuracy when applied to histological images of cutaneous melanoma. However, given the early exploratory nature of these studies, further development work is necessary to improve their performance.