Bisphosphonate Users Research Articles

Real world clinical outcomes when discontinuing denosumab or bisphosphonates in patients with surgically managed osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTOsteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common fragility fractures. Patients who undergo surgical treatment for their initial OVCFs warrant particular attention because there is an elevated risk of subsequent vertebral fractures and other types of fragility fractures. However, the optimal osteoporosis treatment for this specific patient group is less investigated. PURPOSEThis study compares the risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures and mortality rate for patients who are initiated with denosumab and bisphosphonates and determines the effect of adherence to treatment. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective nationwide cohort study PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 2,858 patients who had surgically-managed osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. OUTCOME MEASURESThe risk of osteoporotic fractures, vertebral fractures, nonvertebral fractures and death. METHODSThis is a retrospective nationwide cohort study that uses the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients aged ≥50 years who were admitted for surgical interventions for OVCF between 2012 and 2016 and subsequently received denosumab or bisphosphonates for one year were included. Patients were stratified according to their antiosteoporosis medications and adherence to treatment. A multivariable, time-varying Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the risk of osteoporotic fractures, vertebral fractures, nonvertebral fractures and death. RESULTSA total of 2,858 patients were included in this study: 1,123 patients in the denosumab group and 1,735 patients in the bisphosphonates group. Compared to persistent denosumab users, the nonpersistent denosumab users, persistent bisphosphonate users and nonpersistent bisphosphonate users had a greater risk of osteoporotic fractures, with respective hazard ratios of 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–2.32), 1.74 (95% CI, 1.25–2.42) and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.14–2.06). If osteoporotic fractures were divided into nonvertebral and vertebral fractures, none of the groups exhibited an increased risk of vertebral fractures compared to persistent denosumab users, with an HR of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.54–1.88) for nonpersistent denosumab users, 1.64 (95% CI: 0.96–2.81) for persistent bisphosphonate users and 1.52 (95% CI: 0.95–2.43) for nonpersistent bisphosphonate users. However, there was a significantly greater risk of nonvertebral fracture, with respective hazard ratios of 2.04 (95% CI, 1.33–3.11), 1.80 (95% CI, 1.18–2.76) and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.06–2.27) for nonpersistent denosumab users, persistent bisphosphonate users and nonpersistent users. Noteworthy, nonpersistent denosumab users exhibited a significantly greater risk of mortality than persistent denosumab users, with a hazard ratio of 3.12 (95% CI, 2.22–4.38). CONCLUSIONSIn terms of patients with OVCFs who require hospitalization and surgical intervention, those who receive ongoing denosumab treatment exhibit less risk of developing subsequent osteoporotic fractures than those who receive bisphosphonates or nonpersistent denosumab treatment. However, discontinuation of denosumab is associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent fractures and mortality. Therefore, adherence to the treatment is crucial for patients who are initiated with denosumab.

Bisphosphonates show no association with preventing, slowing, or delaying radiographic changes and pain in hip osteoarthritis: A 4-year study in female adults using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative Study.

This study aimed to investigate the association of bisphosphonates with outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip osteoarthritis (OA) over 4 years. This study examined data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), which included 4088 hips from 2057 participants. Bisphosphonate users were identified as those who reported usage at least three times, including at baseline and during the subsequent 1, 2, 3, and 4-year follow-up visits. Non-users were participants who did not use bisphosphonates in the 5 years preceding the baseline and at subsequent follow-up visits. Generalized estimating equations were performed to assess the association between bisphosphonate use and outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip OA over a 4-year follow-up. The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between bisphosphonate users and non-users concerning outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip OA over 4 years. Specifically, the odds ratios for the incidence and transition of radiographic hip OA were 0.55 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.26 to 1.17) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.47 to 1.28), respectively. Furthermore, the odds ratios for the development and resolution of frequent hip pain were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.42) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.36), respectively. The findings from this longitudinal study do not suggest an association between bisphosphonate use and the prevention, slowing, or delay of development and transition of radiographic changes or pain in hip OA over a 4-year follow-up.

Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Might be Considered a Distinct Subtype of Atypical Femoral Fracture: A Retrospective Study.

The exact relationship among atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures (APFFs), typical periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), and atypical femur fractures (AFFs) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of APFFs among PFFs and to identify the clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis that distinguish APFFs from typical PFFs and AFFs to further determine the relationship among these three fracture types. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data of 117 consecutive patients who had PFFs after hip arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2022 and further classified them into an APFF group and a typical PFF group according to the revised ASBMR diagnostic criteria for AFF. Moreover, patients who had subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures in the same period and met the diagnostic criteria for AFF were recruited and classified into the AFF group. Demographic information, minor features of AFF, comorbidities, history of medication usage, management, and complications were collected and compared among patients with typical PFFs, APFFs, and AFFs. Eleven PFFs were identified as APFFs, and the prevalence of APFFs among PFFs was 9.4%. Significant differences were found in generalized increase in cortical thickness (p = 0.019), prodromal symptoms (p < 0.001), and the incidence of bilateral fractures (p = 0.010) among the groups, where the incidences of these minor features in the APFF group and the AFF group were higher than those in the typical PFF group. Of note, the duration of fracture healing of APFFs was significantly longer than that of typical PFFs and AFFs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). In addition, the APFF group and the AFF group had higher proportions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.004 and p = 0.027, respectively), bisphosphonate (BP) usage (p = 0.026 and p < 0.001, respectively), and longer duration of BP usage (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) than the typical PFF group. Furthermore, significant differences were found in management (p < 0.001) and complication rate (p = 0.020) among the groups, and the rate of complications in the APFF group and the AFF group was higher than that in the typical PFF group. APFFs not only fulfilled the mandatory and major diagnostic criteria for AFF but also had many clinical characteristics, management and prognosis distinguishing them from typical PFFs but resembling AFFs; hence, the diagnostic criteria for AFF might be revised to incorporate APFF as a distinct subtype of the condition.

A multifaceted role of bisphosphonates from palliative care to anti-cancer therapy in solid tumors.

Bisphosphonates (P-C-Ps) also called diphosphonates are the structural analogs of naturally occurring pyrophosphates. Bisphosphonates are traditionally used and shown to provide long-term success in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and other bone loss pathologies. Furthermore, bisphosphonates are gaining popularity in the present era of cancer therapeutics and prevention. The usage of bisphosphonates as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy, either as a single agent or combined with other chemotherapy, has been studied in different solid tumors. This review aims to present the various roles of bisphosphonates in solid tumors. Articles in MEDLINE/PubMed and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (http://www. Clinicaltrials.gov) between 1 January 2011 and 1 February 2022 were extracted using MeSH terms "bisphosphonates/diphosphosphonates and mechanism," "bisphosphonates and breast cancer," "bisphosphonates and prostate cancer," "bisphosphonates and lung cancer," "bisphosphonates and cancer risk," and "bisphosphonates and adverse events." Manual searches of some major oncology journals were also conducted. This review article focuses on the antitumor activity of bisphosphonates, safety profile, and the role of bisphosphonates as preventive, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant chemotherapy. A significant improvement in overall survival and cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival with the usage of bisphosphonates is noted in breast cancer patients, particularly in post-menopausal women. Though great progress has been achieved in over 20 years, further research is needed to identify the subgroup of patients that are most likely to benefit from adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy and to determine regimens with greater efficacy and better safety profile.

No Significant Differences between Bisphosphonates and Placebo for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Objectives: The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the current evidence on the role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of knee bone marrow lesions (BMLs), to understand whether they are truly effective in improving symptoms and restoring the subchondral bone status at imaging evaluation. Methods: A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Potential risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven studies were RCTs, two were prospective cohort studies, three were retrospective, and three were case series. Our meta-analysis revealed that bisphosphonates did not significantly improve clinical scores or reduce BML size compared to placebo. Accordingly, the rate of adverse events was also non-significantly higher among bisphosphonate users versus placebo users. Conclusions: The main finding of the present meta-analysis and systematic review is that bisphosphonates show neither significant benefits nor significant adverse events when compared to placebo in the treatment of BMLs of the knee. Level of Evidence: Level IV systematic review of level II-III-IV studies. Level I meta-analysis of level I studies.

Bisphosphonate effectiveness in patients with cirrhosis: An emulated clinical trial.

Falls and fractures are common and morbid for patients with cirrhosis. Bisphosphonates are recommended for the prevention of fractures for people with osteoporosis cirrhosis; however, data supporting effectiveness in cirrhosis are lacking. We sought to emulate a clinical trial of bisphosphonates in cirrhosis. We used national Medicare data (2008-2020) to examine the 5-year risk of fractures in patients who did or did not receive bisphosphonates with a new-user design among people diagnosed with cirrhosis and osteoporosis. We balanced treated and untreated with inverse probability of treatment weighting, evaluated intention-to-treat and as-treated effects, and examined both control exposures (statin use) and outcomes (decompensation) to test causal relationships. There were 253 and 20,888 new users and non-users of bisphosphonates, respectively. The median age was 74 years. The most common bisphosphonate used was alendronate (73.6%). Bisphosphonates significantly reduced fractures overall (27.5% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.0004) in the intention-to-treat analysis, particularly for people <65 years (sHR 0.56) old, men (sHR 0.64) and those with non-alcohol related liver disease (sHR 0.85). Though there were fewer arm (20.7% vs. 26.4%, p < 0.0001) and femur (28.9% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.005), there were more spinal (25.8% vs. 19.0%), rib (40.0% vs. 32.2%) and skull (10.1% vs. 8.7%) fractures. In the as-treated analysis, cumulative bisphosphonate exposure significantly reduced fractures, sHR 0.95 95% CI (0.91, 0.98). Treatment was inconsistent; bisphosphonate users spent 29.9% person-years of follow-up on the drug. In a nationally representative cohort of elderly patients with cirrhosis, bisphosphonates reduced fractures overall. Efforts to increase uptake and drug continuation are needed.

Effect of Oral Bisphosphonate Drug Holiday on Mortality Following Hip Fracture.

Current clinical guidelines recommend a drug holiday after extended use of oral bisphosphonates. However, no studies have investigated the effect of drug holidays before hip fractures on postfracture mortality. This work aimed to investigate the effect of a drug holiday on postfracture mortality in patients with extended use of oral bisphosphonates. This retrospective, population-based cohort study took place among all patients with hip fractures in Victoria, Australia, from 2014 to 2018. Patients were adherent to oral alendronate or risedronate for 5 years or more prior to hip fracture. Group-based trajectory modeling categorized patients into different bisphosphonate usage after 5-year good adherence. The main outcome measure was postfracture mortality. We identified 365 patients with good adherence (medication possession ratio ≥80%) to oral alendronate/risedronate for 5 years or more. Most patients (69%) continued to use oral bisphosphonates until admission for hip fracture; 17% had discontinued for 1 year and 14% had discontinued for 2 years. Postfracture mortality was higher in patients who had discontinued risedronate for 1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 2.37; 95% CI, 1.24-4.53) and 2 years (HR 3.08; 95% CI, 1.48-6.41) prior to hip fracture. No increase or decrease in postfracture mortality was observed in patients who had discontinued alendronate for 1 year (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29-1.18) or 2 years (HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.57-1.93) prior to hip fracture. Postfracture mortality is higher in people who discontinue risedronate, but not alendronate, for 1 or 2 years after being adherent to treatment for at least 5 years. The type of bisphosphonate may be a factor to consider when planning drug holidays.

Postoperative Bisphosphonates Use is Associated with Reduced Adverse Outcomes After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty of Hip and Knee: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Bisphosphonates have been associated with a decreased risk of revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty of the hip or knee (TJA) because of their effects on decreased periprosthetic bone loss and prosthetic migration. However, the results in the early literature are inconsistent, and the influence of bisphosphonates on associated complications and subsequent TJA remains unknown. This study investigated the association between the use of bisphosphonates and the risk of adverse outcomes after primary TJA. This matched cohort study utilized the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to identify patients who underwent primary TJA over a 15-year period (January 2000-December 2015 inclusive). Study participants were further categorized into two groups, bisphosphonate users and nonusers, using propensity score matching. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of revision surgery, adverse outcomes of primary surgery and subsequent TJA were calculated using Cox regression analysis. This study analyzed data from 6485 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 20,920 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of revision hip and knee arthroplasty was significantly lower in the bisphosphonate users than in the nonusers (aHR, 0.54 and 0.53, respectively). Furthermore, the risk of a subsequent total joint arthroplasty, adverse events and all-cause mortality were also significantly reduced in the bisphosphonate users. This study, involving a large cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroplasties, revealed that bisphosphonate treatment may potentially reduce the risk of revision surgery and associated adverse outcomes. Furthermore, the use of bisphosphonates after TJA is also associated with a reduced need for subsequent arthroplasty.Research Registration Unique Identifying Number (UIN): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier-NCT05623540 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05623540 ).

Assessment of Role of Bisphosphonates on Dental Implant Treatment in Post-menopausal Ladies.

To examine the impact of bisphosphonates (BPs) on dental implant treatment and alveolar bone in post-menopausal ladies. Twenty post-menopausal ladies who had at least one dental implant within the previous 5 years participated in the current study. Ten subjects were categorized into two groups: Group A had BP medication for 1.5 years, and group B received parathyroid hormone (PTH). Both groups' bone thickness and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured. Group A had 5%, and group B had 5% of dental implants failures. BMD of cortical bone was 1468 ± 136 mg/mL and 1008 ± 84 mg/mL in groups A and B, correspondingly. The cortical and cancellous bone densities in both the groups were statically significant. Cortical bone thickness was insignificant in comparison. Both cortical and cancellous bones' bone mineral density decreased in both groups. With continued usage of BPs, the cortical bone thickness increased.

Initiation of Bisphosphonates Prior to Total Joint Arthroplasty Does Not Lower Periprosthetic Fracture Risk

BackgroundMany patients are diagnosed with osteoporosis shortly prior to scheduling total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to determine if initiation of bisphosphonates prior to TJA decreased the risks of periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). MethodsA national database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to primary TJA. Patients who had osteoporosis without preoperative bisphosphonate use were designated as our control group. Patients on preoperative bisphosphonates were stratified based on duration and timing of bisphosphonate use: long-term preoperative users (initiation 3 to 5 years preoperatively), intermediate-term preoperative users (initiation 1 to 3 years preoperatively), and short-term preoperative users (initiation 0 to 1 year preoperatively). Rates of PPFx at 90-day and 2-year follow-up were compared between groups. ResultsIn patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, there was no difference in PPFx rate between our control group and preoperative bisphosphonate users of all durations at 90-day (P = .12) and 2-year follow-up (P = .22). In patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, there was no difference in PPFx rate between our control group and preoperative bisphosphonate users of all durations at 90-day (P = .76) and 2-year follow-up (P = .39). ConclusionsIn patients undergoing primary TJA, preoperative bisphosphonate users did not have a decreased PPFx rate compared to our control group at 90-day and 2-year follow-up. Our findings suggest that preoperative bisphosphonate use, regardless of the duration of treatment, does not confer protective benefits against PPFx in patients undergoing TJA. Level of EvidencePrognostic Level III.

Denosumab and Mortality in a Real-World Setting: A Comparative Study.

Denosumab (Dmab) is increasingly prescribed worldwide. Unlike bisphosphonates (BPs), its effect on mortality has yet to be well explored. This study examined the association between Dmab and all-cause mortality compared with no treatment in subjects with a fracture and BPs in subjects without a fracture. The study population was from the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study (n = 267,357), a prospective population-based cohort with questionnaire data linked to hospital admissions (Admitted Patients Data Collection [APDC] data were linked by the Centre for Health Record Linkage), medication records (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme [PBS] provided by Services Australia), and stored securely (secure data access was provided through the Sax Institute's Secure Unified Research Environment [SURE]). The new-user cohort design with propensity-score (PS) matching was implemented. In the fracture cohort, Dmab and oral BP users were matched 1:2 to no treatment (Dmab: 617 women, 154 men; oral BPs: 615 women, 266 men). In the no-fracture cohort, Dmab users were matched 1:1 with oral BPs and zoledronic acid (Zol) users (Dmab:oral BPs: 479 men, 1534 women; Dmab:Zol: 280 men, 625 women). Mortality risk was measured using sex-specific pairwise multivariable Cox models. In the fracture cohort, compared with no treatment, Dmab was associated with 48% lower mortality in women (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.72) but not in men. Oral BPs were associated with 44% lower mortality in both sexes (women HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.77; men HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78). In the no-fracture cohort, compared with BPs, Dmab was associated with 1.5- to 2.5-fold higher mortality than oral BPs (women HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.13-1.98; men HR = 2.74; 95% CI 1.82-4.11) but similar mortality to Zol. Dmab in women and oral BPs were associated with lower post-fracture mortality than no treatment. However, Dmab users had generally higher mortality than oral BP users in those without fractures. © 2023 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Atypical Versus Typical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: Disparate Patient Profiles, Similar Outcomes.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate differences in demographic features and clinical outcomes between patients who sustained a typical versus atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture. We reviewed the records for a cohort of consecutive patients who had undergone operative treatment of a subtrochanteric femoral fracture. Fractures were classified as either "typical" or "atypical" on the basis of the criteria of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). All patients were treated with a similar surgical algorithm and postoperative protocol. Groups were compared on the basis of demographic features, injury characteristics, operative quality measures, postoperative complications and outcomes, and radiographic time to healing. Comparative analyses were performed to compare the typical and atypical cohorts. Of 220 subtrochanteric fractures, 165 (75.0%) were classified as typical and 55 (25.0%) were classified as atypical. The atypical cohort was predominately female and more likely to have bisphosphonate usage (odds ratio [OR], 7.975; [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.994-15.922]; p < 0.001) and fractures with lower-energy mechanisms (p < 0.001). Patients in the atypical cohort were more likely to be treated with a 10-mm cephalomedullary nail (CMN) (OR, 2.100 [95% CI, 1.119-3.939]; p = 0.020), whereas patients in the typical cohort were treated more frequently with an 11-mm CMN (OR, 0.337 [95% CI, 0.168-0.674]; p = 0.002). There were no differences between the groups in terms of other operative parameters; however, anatomic fracture reduction in neutral lateral alignment was achieved more frequently in the typical cohort (OR, 0.438 [95% CI, 0.220-0.875]; p = 0.018). There were no differences between the groups in terms of hospital quality measures, mortality rates, readmission rates, or complication rates (including implant failure [broken screw or nail] and fracture nonunion) (p = 1.00). Interestingly, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of time to radiographic healing (260.30 ± 187.97 days in the typical group, compared with 246.40 ± 116.33 days in the atypical group) (OR, 0.999 [95% CI, 0.997-1.002]; p = 0.606). Despite differences in terms of demographic and injury characteristics, patients who sustain a subtrochanteric femur fracture can expect similar outcome profiles regardless of fracture type. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Coronary artery calcification is associated with smaller increases in femoral neck bone mineral density with anti-resorptive therapy

Abstract Introduction Patients with osteoporosis are at high cardiovascular risk, partly due to vascular calcification, such as in the coronary vessels. It is uncertain if the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) effects bone mineral density (BMD) response to anti-resorptive treatment – first line therapy for osteoporosis. We therefore assessed changes in BMD following initiation of anti-resorptive treatment for osteoporosis in patients with and without evidence of CAC. Methods Individuals dispensed at least one prescription for an anti-resorptive medication (bisphosphonates or denosumab) at Monash Health between 2009-2022 were identified. Unique record numbers for these individuals were then cross-matched against the cardiac CT imaging service at Monash Heart (HREC#73603). CAC was detected using a 320-slice CT coronary angiogram (CTCA). We included only those patients having a baseline BMD measurement within two years of CTCA. The annualised percentage change in femoral neck BMD was calculated and adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and number of years on anti-resorptive treatment. Results 106 individuals were identified of which 85 (women=70 [85%], median age=73 years [interquartile range 64-79 years]) had a follow-up BMD measurement including 19 with, and 66 without, evidence of CAC. Those with CAC were older (76 years versus 64 years, p&amp;lt;0.001). There were 70 bisphosphonate users and 15 denosumab users. Individuals with evidence of CAC experienced, on average, a 1.2% lower increase [(0.345% (0.343 to 0.348) versus -0.881% (-0.883 to -0.879), mean difference -1.226% (-1.493 to -0.959; p&amp;lt;0.05)] in annualised femoral neck BMD with anti-resorptive therapy after adjusting for important clinical risk factors. Interpretation These preliminary data suggests that CTCA-determined CAC may negatively impact femoral neck BMD increases with anti-resorptive therapy. This is perhaps consistent with existing and evolving hypotheses of dysregulatory processes driving ectopic calcium deposition, which we surmise would partially counter the effects of anti-resorptive therapy and potentially manifest as CAC. Thus, of particular interest will be the comparison of cardiovascular outcomes of patients with known CAC with and without anti-resorptive therapy, with the hypothesis that anti-resorptive therapy may potentially have cardioprotective effects in context of CAC. Analysis of the full cohort is underway.Table 1

Medication adherence of bisphosphonate weekly or monthly regimens in patients with osteoporosis using a nationwide large claims database.

Bisphosphonate (BPN) therapy, which mainly targets osteoporosis, evolves rapidly, leaving patients and physicians with a substantial collection of BPN regimen options. In this study, we aimed to clarify BPN medication adherence between weekly and monthly regimens using a nationwide claims database in Japan. We analyzed 5,016 patients with a screening period of 3 months and a 12 month observation period who started using BPN. We used propensity score matching with baseline patient background after dividing the patients into two groups: weekly and monthly BPN users. Medication adherence was calculated using proportion days cover (PDC). A PDC of > 80% was 55.9% and 52.5% in monthly and weekly formulas, respectively, during the 12 months after initiating BPN treatment. PDC-based BPN medication adherence was higher in monthly regimens than in weekly regimens (66.3±34.0 vs. 64.1±36.8%). No differences were found in the proportion of patients with > 80% medication adherence between the monthly and weekly regimens after stratifying patient background using propensity score matching. Our clinical findings highlight the importance of closely monitoring BPN medication adherence, particularly during the initial year of therapy. Notably, half of the patients with osteoporosis exhibited low medication adherence. Therefore, prioritizing monthly regimens over weekly regimens is crucial to promote BPN adherence and ensure optimal treatment outcomes.

Antiosteoporosis medications and cardiovascular disease: a population-based nationwide nested case-control study.

Purpose: Patients with osteoporosis are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several antiosteoporosis medications have been demonstrated with the benefit of preventing osteoporosis. Our aim is to assess the CVD risks associated with antiosteoporosis medications using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between 2000 and 2016. Methods: Among 41,102 patients of 40+ years old with newly diagnosed osteoporosis, 69.1% (N = 28,387) of patients were included in the user cohort of antiosteoporosis medicines, of whom 13, 472 developed CVD by the end of 2016, while 14,915 did not. Using the nested case-control analysis in the user cohort (88.0% women and 77.4% elderly), we applied conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of eight types of CVD for the users of denosumab, bisphosphonate, teriparatide, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Results: The adjusted ORs of overall CVDs were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.12-0.15) for denosumab users, 0.52 (95% CI: 0.45-0.61) for teriparatide users, and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85) for bisphosphonate users. The HRT users were at higher odds of coronary artery and peripheral artery diseases, heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Denosumab, teriparatide, and bisphosphonate may have more protective effects against CVD than hormone therapy. Physicians may take subsequent cardiovascular risks into account when choosing an adequate antiosteoporosis medication for patients with osteoporosis.

THU442 A Case Of Early Medication Related Osteonecrosis Of The Jaw In Patient Receiving Intravenous Zoledronate For Treatment Of Osteoporosis

Abstract Disclosure: V. Ekpe: None. X. Au: None. M. Golson: None. L.E. McGuire: None. L.E. Aguirre: None. Introduction: Medication related Osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare side effect in patients receiving nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates intravenously and other anti-bone resorptive agents such as denosumab . The incidence is 0.1% in patients with metabolic bone disease1. Annual infusions of zoledronic acid have been recommended in order to improve patient compliance, optimize therapeutic effects and to minimize side effects in selected patients. Risk factors include history of malignancy, smoking, poor dental health, prior oral surgery, high dose exposure to zoledronic acid and longer duration of treatment with anti-resorptive therapy. Increasing usage of bisphosphonates and other antiresorptive drugs, have led to an increased incidence of MRONJ. Clinical Case: We report the case of a 63-year-old Caucasian female suffering from osteoporosis who developed early stage MRONJ. She has a history of several years of oral bisphosphonate treatment and three annual administrations of zoledronic acid. Patient presented with a new complaint of gum pain and a sore above her tooth. Prior routine dental exams have all been unremarkable. She was promptly referred and evaluated by a dental provider. Dental photographs showed a resorptive defect at the gumline. Patient was diagnosed with medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in the gum area above tooth number 9. Our patient was treated with oral amoxicillin 500mg twice daily and chlorhexidine gluconate mouth rinse twice daily. The intravenous zoledronic acid was discontinued. Her gum infection resolved. Discussion: Early detection of MRONJ is possible in patients potentially at risk for this rare complication. Providers should be aware of MRONJ and refer those patients on antiresorptive drugs to the dentist for frequent evaluation and assessment for any drug-related jaw changes.

Does Perioperative use of Bisphosphonate Affect Implant Revision Rate of Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Other Introduction/Purpose: It is unknown whether perioperative bisphosphonate (BP) use reduces revision rates in total ankle replacement arthroplasty (TAR) although its effect has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing revision rates in total knee or hip replacement arthroplasty. Therefore, the purpose of this study was 1) to investigate whether there is a relationship between the use of BP and the revision rate of TAR, and (2) to determine the effect of BP medication period on the revision rate of TAR. Our hypothesis was that the use of BP would lower the revision rate of TAR. Methods: We reviewed National Health Insurance Service data based on national health insurance service claim data and health care utilization, health screening, socio-demographic variables, medication history, operation codes, and mortality data for 50 million Koreans. From 2002 to 2014, 6391 of 7300 patients who underwent TAR were BP non-users, while 909 patients were BP users. The revision rate according to BP medication and co-morbidities was investigated. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and extended Cox proportional hazard model were also used. Results: The revision rate of TAR was 7.9% for BP users and 9.5% for BP non-users, which showed no significant difference (p=0.251). Implant survival over time decreased constantly. Adjusted hazard ratio for hypertension was 1.242 (p=0.017), while other co-morbidities such as diabetes had no effect on revision rate of TAR. Conclusion: We found that the perioperative BP use do not reduce the revision rate of TAR. Co-morbidities except hypertension did not affect the revision rate of TAR. More research regarding various factor affecting revision of TAR could be warranted.

A population-based registry study of extended bisphosphonate use: minimal shift after landmark publications about shorter treatment duration.

Optimal duration of bisphosphonate therapy was unknown until the FLEX study was published in 2006 showing a 5-year course to be adequate for most women. In 2008 a link between long-term bisphosphonate and atypical femoral fractures was reported and confirmed in later studies. We hypothesized these landmark observations should have led to a decrease in use of bisphosphonates for >5 or 10 years, from 2010 onward. The Manitoba BMD registry with linkage to provincial pharmacy data was used to determine the percentage of long and very-long term bisphosphonate users from therapy start. The cohort comprised women age > 50 with BMD between 1995-2018 with oral bisphosphonate first prescribed for >90 days with adherence >75% in the first year. For each calendar year of continued therapy, the percentage of patients and medication possession rate was tabulated. The percentage of users beyond 5 years was compared between patients who started therapy in 1998-2004 (those taking 5 years of therapy still finish prior to 2010) versus 2005-2012 (all new therapy starts overlap 2010 in those taking ≥5 years treatment). The cohort included 2991 women with mean follow up 8.8(1.3) years, 64.9% of whom took continuous oral bisphosphonate for >5 years and 41.9% for >10 years. In the earlier vs later era, there were 74.4% vs 70.2% who completed 5 years. With respect to longer treatment, there were 68.0% and 60.5% of patients treated for 6 or more years (p < 0.0001) and 46.6% vs 33.5% treated for >10 years (p = 0.08). Medication possession rate was >79% in every year of therapy. Landmark studies leading to more limited bisphosphonate courses may have slightly reduced longer-term treatment, but up to one-third of adherent patients in the modern era still receive continuous bisphosphonate therapy for >10 years. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

P06 Think of hypophosphatasia if atypical fracture with persistent low ALP levels

Abstract Introduction Hypophosphatasia (HPP), a rare, underdiagnosed metabolic genetic bone disease caused by diminished or absent expression of the tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) enzyme. The mutation of alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) gene leads to wide-ranging clinical manifestations, broadly classified into six different types based on age of onset and severity of the disease. Fragility fractures are predominant characteristics of adult onset HPP and are often misdiagnosed as osteoporosis, stipulating antiresorptive treatment. However, bisphosphonates (BP) make HPP more susceptible to atypical fractures and thus are contraindicated. A recent study shows 1:4 atypical femoral fracture cases are linked with monogenic bone diseases including HPP. Case description A 63-year-old Caucasian female was referred to our osteoporosis clinic, at the age of 57 following an atypical right femur fracture while on bisphosphonate and steroids. Her past medical history includes multiple right thigh sarcoma at the age of 39, 45 and 49 years requiring multiple surgeries and localised radiotherapy. She was also diagnosed with ocular myasthenia gravis two years before the atypical fracture, requiring long term high dose steroids. Her other co-morbidities include type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Due to long term steroids, her primary care physician initiated weekly 70 mg oral alendronic acid. However, three months later she had a spontaneous right mid shaft femur fracture. The patient experienced one year of right thigh pain prior to fracture which was not brought to medical attention. She underwent intramedullary nailing and successful rehabilitation. A thorough assessment in fracture liaison service spotted the history of primary tooth loss with roots intact in childhood, and chronic dental problems crowning in adult life requiring many caps and crowns. Her mother has a history of “childhood onset rickets”, bowing of legs and complete loss of all her permanent teeth at the age of 30 years. A review of blood tests revealed normal calcium, vitamin D and parathyroid levels, multiple low alkaline phosphatase levels between 16 – 23 U/L(normal range 30-130 U/L) prior to bisphosphonates, vitamin B6 fasting blood test had shown raised result at 140 (normal range 40-100). Xray of the left femur was normal. The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan yielded normal T score. The genetic test confirmed heterozygous gene mutation in ALPL gene, confirming a diagnosis of hypophosphatasia. She recovered well from her fracture and manages to walk more than one mile unaided. She is currently under regular follow-up in our hypophosphatasia clinic and has stopped bisphosphonates indefinitely. Discussion The underlying cause for atypical femoral fracture (AFF) in this case is multifactorial; long-term steroids, radiotherapy, HPP and bisphosphonate usage. Regardless, there is a relationship between hypophosphatasia and AFF. Some studies have proved that more than 90% of the patients with AFF used long term BPs. The defective ALPL gene in HPP affects bone mineralisation, resulting in accumulation of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), which impairs hydroxyapatite crystal formation causing recurrent fractures, osteopenia, delayed wound healing, dental problems, atypical and pseudo fractures. Bisphosphonates are chemical derivates of PPi, and thus inversely affect bone mineralisation especially in cases of TNSALP mutations and thus are contraindicated in HPP. The atypical fractures often may remain undiagnosed for a long time despite often prolonged prodromal pain occurring before the actual fracture. Careful clinical evaluation and plain X-ray will help to make the diagnosis. Hypophosphatasia related fractures mostly occur laterally in the subtrochanteric diaphysis. AFF cases often require surgical repair with intramedullary nailing. If an imminent atypical fracture is diagnosed early, prophylactic surgery is sometimes recommended. After three months of alendronic acid, bone turnover markers are usually suppressed, therefore despite the short time of alendronate exposure, this is likely to have contributed to the atypical femur fracture. Also, genetic test revealed inherited autosomal dominant trait of HPP in this case, enabled family screening and prevention of potential use of future bisphosphonates in affected family members. Key learning points HPP presenting in adulthood may be more common than previously though with a recent study estimating prevalence of the mild HPP genotype to be 1:508, although not all cases will be symptomatic. A persistent low alkaline phosphatase together with a fragility or atypical fracture raises suspicion of hypophosphatasia. A thorough clinical evaluation, fasting vitamin B6 levels, urine phosphoethanol amine levels and ALPL genetic test will aid the diagnosis. Severe cases of hypophosphatasia are treated with asfotase alfa, enzyme replacement therapy, to prevent debilitating complications, while most mild and moderate cases are offered supportive management. Bisphosphonate treatment is contraindicated in hypophosphatasia. It is worth reviewing ALP levels prior to antiresorptive therapy in suspected cases, as bisphosphonates often reduce ALP levels, masking the diagnosis. High risk Osteoporosis cases should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting with careful risk-benefit evaluation. Cases like this highlight the importance of early HPP diagnosis to avoid contraindicating treatments and their consequences.

Menaquinone-4 prevents medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw through the SIRT1 signaling-mediated inhibition of cellular metabolic stresses-induced osteoblast apoptosis.

Long-term usage of bisphosphonates, especially zoledronic acid (ZA), induces osteogenesis disorders and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients, thereby contributing to the destruction of bone remodeling and the continuous progression of osteonecrosis. Menaquinone-4 (MK-4), a specific vitamin K2 isoform converted by the mevalonate (MVA) pathway in vivo, exerts the promotion of bone formation, whereas ZA administration suppresses this pathway and results in endogenous MK-4 deficiency. However, no study has evaluated whether exogenous MK-4 supplementation can prevent ZA-induced MRONJ. Here we showed that MK-4 pretreatment partially ameliorated mucosal nonunion and bone sequestration among ZA-treated MRONJ mouse models. Moreover, MK-4 promoted bone regeneration and inhibited osteoblast apoptosis in vivo. Consistently, MK-4 downregulated ZA-induced osteoblast apoptosis in MC3T3-E1 cells and suppressed the levels of cellular metabolic stresses, including oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and DNA damage, which were accompanied by elevated sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression. Notably, EX527, an inhibitor of the SIRT1 signaling pathway, abolished the inhibitory effects of MK-4 on ZA-induced cell metabolic stresses and osteoblast damage. Combined with experimental evidences from MRONJ mouse models and MC3T3-E1 cells, our findings suggested that MK-4 prevents ZA-induced MRONJ by inhibiting osteoblast apoptosis through suppression of cellular metabolic stresses in a SIRT1-dependent manner. The results provide a novel translational direction for the clinical application of MK-4 for preventing MRONJ.