Bisimulation Proof Method Research Articles

Modular coinduction up-to for higher-order languages via first-order transition systems

The bisimulation proof method can be enhanced by employing `bisimulations up-to' techniques. A comprehensive theory of such enhancements has been developed for first-order (i.e., CCS-like) labelled transition systems (LTSs) and bisimilarity, based on abstract fixed-point theory and compatible functions. We transport this theory onto languages whose bisimilarity and LTS go beyond those of first-order models. The approach consists in exhibiting fully abstract translations of the more sophisticated LTSs and bisimilarities onto the first-order ones. This allows us to reuse directly the large corpus of up-to techniques that are available on first-order LTSs. The only ingredient that has to be manually supplied is the compatibility of basic up-to techniques that are specific to the new languages. We investigate the method on the pi-calculus, the lambda-calculus, and a (call-by-value) lambda-calculus with references.

Equations, Contractions, and Unique Solutions

One of the most studied behavioural equivalences is bisimilarity. Its success is much due to the associated bisimulation proof method, which can be further enhanced by means of “bisimulation up-to” techniques such as “up-to context.” A different proof method is discussed, based on a unique solution of special forms of inequations called contractions and inspired by Milner’s theorem on unique solution of equations. The method is as powerful as the bisimulation proof method and its “up-to context” enhancements. The definition of contraction can be transferred onto other behavioural equivalences, possibly contextual and non-coinductive. This enables a coinductive reasoning style on such equivalences, either by applying the method based on unique solution of contractions or by injecting appropriate contraction preorders into the bisimulation game. The techniques are illustrated in CCS-like languages; an example dealing with higher-order languages is also shown.

Enhanced coalgebraic bisimulation

We present a systematic study of bisimulation-up-to techniques for coalgebras. This enhances the bisimulation proof method for a large class of state based systems, including labelled transition systems but also stream systems and weighted automata. Our approach allows for compositional reasoning about the soundness of enhancements. Applications include the soundness of bisimulation up to bisimilarity, up to equivalence and up to congruence. All in all, this gives a powerful and modular framework for simplified coinductive proofs of equivalence.

Presenting Distributive Laws

Distributive laws of a monad T over a functor F are categorical tools for specifying algebra-coalgebra interaction. They proved to be important for solving systems of corecursive equations, for the specification of well-behaved structural operational semantics and, more recently, also for enhancements of the bisimulation proof method. If T is a free monad, then such distributive laws correspond to simple natural transformations. However, when T is not free it can be rather difficult to prove the defining axioms of a distributive law. In this paper we describe how to obtain a distributive law for a monad with an equational presentation from a distributive law for the underlying free monad. We apply this result to show the equivalence between two different representations of context-free languages.

Equations, Contractions, and Unique Solutions

One of the most studied behavioural equivalences is bisimilarity. Its success is much due to the associated bisimulation proof method, which can be further enhanced by means of "up-to bisimulation" techniques such as "up-to context". A different proof method is discussed, based on unique solution of special forms of inequations called contractions, and inspired by Milner's theorem on unique solution of equations. The method is as powerful as the bisimulation proof method and its "up-to context" enhancements. The definition of contraction can be transferred onto other behavioural equivalences, possibly contextual and noncoinductive. This enables a coinductive reasoning style on such equivalences, either by applying the method based on unique solution of contractions, or by injecting appropriate contraction preorders into the bisimulation game. The techniques are illustrated on CCS-like languages; an example dealing with higher-order languages is also shown.

Bisimulation proof methods in a path-based specification language for polynomial coalgebras

What reasoning rules can be used for the deduction of bisimulation formulas in coalgebraic specifications is problematic because those rules used in algebraic specifications possibly cannot be applied to bisimulation formulas. Although some categorical bisimulation proof methods for coalgebras have been proposed, they are not based on specification languages of coalgebras so that they cannot be used as reasoning rules. In this paper, a specification language based on paths of polynomial functors is proposed to specify polynomial coalgebras. Paths of polynomial functors give detailed observations and transitions on the state space of coalgebras so that the techniques used in transition system specifications can be applied to such a path-based language. In particular, because bisimulations can be characterized by paths, the notions of progressions, respectful functions and faithful contexts can be defined based on paths, and then bisimulation up-to proof techniques, including bisimulation up-to bisimilarities and up-to contexts for transition systems can be transformed into reasoning rules in the language. Several examples illustrate how to reason syntactically about bisimulations in the language by using the rules induced by the bisimulation proof techniques.

Environmental bisimulations for higher-order languages

Developing a theory of bisimulation in higher-order languages can be hard. Particularly challenging can be: (1) the proof of congruence, as well as enhancements of the bisimulation proof method with “up-to context” techniques, and (2) obtaining definitions and results that scale to languages with different features. To meet these challenges, we present environment{} bisimulations , a form of bisimulation for higher-order languages, and its basic theory. We consider four representative calculi: pure λ-calculi (call-by-name and call-by-value), call-by-value λ-calculus with higher-order store, and then Higher-Order π-calculus. In each case: we present the basic properties of environment bisimilarity, including congruence; we show that it coincides with contextual equivalence; we develop some up-to techniques, including up-to context, as examples of possible enhancements of the associated bisimulation method. Unlike previous approaches (such as applicative bisimulations, logical relations, Sumii-Pierce-Koutavas-Wand), our method does not require induction/indices on evaluation derivation/steps (which may complicate the proofs of congruence, transitivity, and the combination with up-to techniques), or sophisticated methods such as Howe's for proving congruence. It also scales from the pure λ-calculi to the richer calculi with simple congruence proofs.

On the observational theory of the CPS-calculus

We apply powerful proof-techniques of concurrency theory to study the observational theory of Thielecke’s CPS-calculus, a distillation of the target language of Continuation-Passing Style transforms. We define a labelled transition system from which we derive a (weak) labelled bisimilarity that completely characterises Morris’ context-equivalence. We prove a context lemma showing that Morris’ context-equivalence coincides with a simpler context-equivalence closed under a smaller class of contexts. Then we profit of the determinism of the CPS-calculus to give a simpler labelled characterisation of Morris’ equivalence, in the style of Abramsky’s applicative bisimilarity. We enhance our bisimulation proof-methods with up to bisimilarity and up to context proof techniques. We use our bisimulation proof techniques to investigate a few algebraic properties on diverging terms that cannot be proved using the original axiomatic semantics of the CPS-calculus.

New up-to techniques for weak bisimulation

Up-to techniques have been introduced to enhance the bisimulation proof method for establishing bisimilarity results. While up-to techniques for strong bisimilarity are well understood, the irregularities that appear in the weak case make it difficult to give a unified presentation. We propose a uniform and modular theory of up-to techniques for weak bisimulation that captures most of the existing proof technology and introduces new techniques. Some proofs rely on nontrivial–and new–commutation results based on termination guarantees. All results presented in this paper have been formally proved using the Coq proof assistant.

A bisimulation for dynamic sealing

We define λ seal , an untyped call-by-value λ -calculus with primitives for protecting abstract data by sealing, and develop a bisimulation proof method that is sound and complete with respect to contextual equivalence. This provides a formal basis for reasoning about data abstraction in open, dynamic settings where static techniques such as type abstraction and logical relations are not applicable.

An Effective Coalgebraic Bisimulation Proof Method

The bisimulation “up-to-…” technique provides an effective way to relieve the amount of work in proving bisimilarity of two processes. This paper develops a fresh and direct approach to generalize this set-theoretic “up-to-...” principle to the setting of coalgebra theory. The notion of consistent function is introduced, as a generalization of Sangiorgi's sound function. Then, in order to prove that there are only bisimilar pairs in a relation, it is sufficient to find a morphism from it to the “lifting” of its image under some consistent function. One example is given showing that every self-bisimulation in normed BPA is just such a relation. What's more, we investigate the connection between span-bisimulation and ref-bisimulation. As a result, λ-bisimulation turns out to be covered by our new principle.

On the Observational Theory of the CPS-calculus: (Extended Abstract)

We study the observational theory of Thielecke's (recursive) CPS-calculus, a target language for CPS transforms designed to bring out the jumping, imperative nature of continuation-passing.We define a labelled transition system for the CPS-calculus from which we derive a (weak) labelled bisimilarity that completely characterises Morris' context-equivalence. We prove a context lemma showing that Morris' context-equivalence coincides with a simpler context-equivalence closed under a certain class of contexts. Then we profit of the determinism of the CPS-calculus to give a simpler labelled characterisation of Morris' equivalence, resembling Abramsky's applicative bisimilarity. We enhance our bisimulation proof-methods with up-to bisimilarity and up-to context proof techniques. We use our bisimulation proof techniques to study the algebraic theory of the CPS-calculus proving two new algebraic laws that we conjecture cannot be derived using the original axiomatic semantics for the CPS-calculus. Finally, we prove the full abstraction of Thielecke's encoding of the CPS-calculus into a fragment of Fournet and Gonthier's Join-calculus with single pattern definitions.

A bisimulation for dynamic sealing

We define λ seal , an untyped call-by-value λ-calculus with primitives for protecting abstract data by sealing , and develop a bisimulation proof method that is sound and complete with respect to contextual equivalence. This provides a formal basis for reasoning about data abstraction in open, dynamic settings where static techniques such as type abstraction and logical relations are not applicable.

On the bisimulation proof method

The most popular method for establishing bisimilarities among processes is to exhibit bisimulation relations. By definition, [Rscr ] is a bisimulation relation if [Rscr ] progresses to [Rscr ] itself, i.e., pairs of processes in [Rscr ] can match each other's actions and their derivatives are again in [Rscr ].We study generalisations of the method aimed at reducing the size of the relations to be exhibited and hence relieving the proof work needed to establish bisimilarity results. We allow a relation [Rscr ] to progress to a different relation [Fscr ] ([Rscr ]), where [Fscr ] is a function on relations. Functions that can be safely used in this way (i.e., such that if [Rscr ] progresses to [Fscr ] ([Rscr ]), then [Rscr ] only includes pairs of bisimilar processes) are sound. We give a simple condition that ensures soundness. We show that the class of sound functions contains non-trivial functions and we study the closure properties of the class with respect to various important function constructors, like composition, union and iteration. These properties allow us to construct sophisticated sound functions – and hence sophisticated proof techniques for bisimilarity – from simpler ones.The usefulness of our proof techniques is supported by various non-trivial examples drawn from the process algebras CCS and π-calculus. They include the proof of the unique solution of equations and the proof of a few properties of the replication operator. Among these, there is a novel result that justifies the adoption of a simple form of prefix-guarded replication as the only form of replication in the π-calculus.