At first glance Stefan Bargheer’s book is 300-plus pages about bird watching, filled with detailed accounts of 19th, 20th, and 21st century bird enthusiasts and their alphabet soup of organizations in Britain and Germany. There are bird manuals, bird boxes, Nazi concentration camp guards who birdwatch on the side, and even a photo of a bird defecating on the German tricolor. Bargheer plunges the reader—in my case, a reader largely unfamiliar with the world of bird watching—into this milieu with a detailed historical comparison based on life histories of its protagonists. Despite what may at first seem like an esoteric subject matter, the book tackles theoretical questions central to our discipline, as well as providing a penetrating critique of how we tend to think of environmentalism’s rise. In Europe, the protection of birds drives environmental legislation. The British, in particular, love birds and bird watching at extremely high rates. Bargheer examines the emergence of bird conservation and its transformation in Britain and Germany. He places the contribution of his book in the sociology of morality, examining its foundational questions empirically. Drawing on Dewey’s pragmatist theory of valuation, Bargheer argues that moral values (e.g., saving birds or nature) cannot be empirically or analytically separated from the practices in which they are embedded. The value of birds to bird conservationists is based on how birds fit within bird collecting practices and institutions. Values are the outcome of the transformation in practices and institutions, rather than driving these transformation. To study morality, we need to examine practices and institutions, not the discourse, which may be extensive and yet have no actual material effect.
Read full abstract