Biplanar X-ray System Research Articles

Measuring Knee Joint Laxity in Three Degrees-of-Freedom In Vivo Using a Robotics- and Image-Based Technology.

Accurate and reliable information about three-dimensional (3D) knee joint laxity can prevent misdiagnosis and avoid incorrect treatments. Nevertheless, knee laxity assessments presented in the literature suffer from significant drawbacks such as soft tissue artifacts, restricting the knee within the measurement, and the absence of quantitative knee ligament property information. In this study, we demonstrated the applicability of a novel methodology for measuring 3D knee laxity, combining robotics- and image-based technology. As such technology has never been applied to healthy living subjects, the aims of this study were to develop novel technology to measure 3D knee laxity in vivo and to provide proof-of-concept 3D knee laxity measurements. To measure tibiofemoral movements, four healthy subjects were placed on a custom-built arthrometer located inside a low dose biplanar X-ray system with an approximately 60 deg knee flexion angle. Anteroposterior and mediolateral translation as well as internal and external rotation loads were subsequently applied to the unconstrained leg, which was placed inside a pneumatic cast boot. Bone contours were segmented in the obtained X-rays, to which subject-specific bone geometries from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were registered. Afterward, tibiofemoral poses were computed. Measurements of primary and secondary laxity revealed considerable interpersonal differences. The method differs from those available by the ability to accurately track secondary laxity of the unrestricted knee and to apply coupled forces in multiple planes. Our methodology can provide reliable information for academic knee ligament research as well as for clinical diagnostics in the future.

Knee Extension Is Related to the Posteriorly Deviated Gravity Line to the Pelvis in Young Adults: Radiographic Analysis Using Low-Dose Biplanar X-ray.

PurposeWe sought to compare the radiographic parameters concerning the sagittal alignment of the standing whole-body skeletons between the knee extension group and control group using the low-dose biplanar X-ray system in a young adult population without knee pain, and to investigate the associated variables for the sagittal knee angle (sagKA) among the radiographic parameters of global sagittal alignment.Materials and MethodsWe reviewed whole-body standing sagittal radiographs of 124 young adults taken from December 2018 to May 2020 in a single institution. We compared the radiographic parameters concerning the lower extremity sagittal alignment and global sagittal alignment between the knee extension group and control group. The factors correlated with sagKA were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis.ResultsThe sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the horizontal offset between the gravity line (GL) and the posterior edge of S1 endplate (GL-S), and the horizontal offset between the GL and the hip center (GL-H) were -11.6±21.3 mm, 5.1±23.8 mm, and -25.1±27.1 mm in the knee extension group, respectively, which were significantly smaller than those in the control group. The C7 plumb line (C7PL) and GL were deviated posterior to the sacrum and the hip center in the knee extension group, with the mean sagKA of -5.6° in young adults.ConclusionThe GL-H using GL, not the SVA using C7PL, was a significant radiographic factor associated with the sagKA.

Exploring the relationship between pain intensity and knee moments in participants with medial knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundHigh biomechanical loading is believed to be a risk factor to pain in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), but controversial findings have been reported on the relationship between external knee adduction moment (KAM) and pain. A more comprehensive analysis considering other factor such as external knee flexion moment (KFM) could help better reveal this relationship. This study explored the relationship between external knee adduction moment and pain intensity in participants with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using an integrated path analysis model.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study based on laboratory setting. Forty-seven participants with clinical and radiographic medial knee OA were analyzed for their external knee adduction moment (KAM) and knee flexion moment (KFM) during walking using a motion analysis system. Pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the pain subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Varus/valgus alignment was captured and quantified using a bi-planar X-ray system. Using a path analysis model, the relationships between pain intensity, KAM, KFM, OA radiographic severity, knee varus angle and walking speed were examined.ResultsThe proposed path model met the goodness-of-fit criteria. Based on this model, KAM had a negative effect on VAS pain indirectly through the mediation of KFM. The model indicated KAM and KFM were negatively related to one another; and KFM was positively related to VAS. The KAM index, defined as (KAM/ (KAM + KFM)), was negatively related to VAS.ConclusionsPath analysis enabled the construction of a more integrated pathokinematic framework for people with knee OA. The KAM index which reflected the load sharing on the frontal and sagittal planes also revealed its relationship with pain. Re-distribution of mechanical loading from frontal to sagittal plane might be a strategy for pain avoidance associated with mechanical irritation.

Knee joint loadings are related to tibial torsional alignments in people with radiographic medial knee osteoarthritis.

Torsional malalignment was detected in subjects with medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) but few studies have reported the effect of torsional deformity on knee joint loads during walking. Therefore, this study examined the relationships between lower limb torsional alignments and knee joint loads during gait in people with symptomatic medial KOA using cross-sectional study design. Lower limb alignments including tibial torsion, tibiofemoral rotation and varus/valgus alignments in standing were measured by EOS low-dose bi-planar x-ray system in 47 subjects with mild or moderate KOA. The external knee adduction moment (KAM), flexion moment (KFM) and the KAM index which was defined as (KAM/ (KAM+KFM)*100) during walking were analyzed using a motion analysis system so as to estimate the knee loads. Results revealed externaltibial torsion was positively associated with KAM in subjects with moderate KOA (r = 0.59, p = 0.02) but not in subjects with mild KOA. On the contrary, significant association was found between knee varus/valgus alignment and KAM in the mild KOA group (r = 0.58, p<0.001) and a sign of association in the moderate KOA group (r = 0.47, p = 0.08). We concluded tibial torsion and knee varus/valgus mal-alignments would be associated with joint loading in subjects with moderate medial KOA during walking. Radiographic severity might need to be considered when using gait modification as a rehabilitation strategy for this condition.

Comparison of 3D and 2D characterization of spinal geometry from biplanar X-rays: a large cohort study.

Biplanar X-ray system providing anteroposterior and sagittal plane with an ultra-low radiation dose and in weight-bearing position is increasingly used for spine imaging. The original three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction method from biplanar X-rays has been widely used for clinical parameters, however, the main issue is that manual adjustments of the 3D model was quite time-consuming and limited to thoracolumbar spine. A quasi-automated 3D reconstruction method of the spine from cervical vertebra to pelvis was proposed, which proved fast and accurate in 57 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The aim of this study was to compare the newly developed technique of quasi-automatic 3D measurement with classical 2D measurements in a large cohort. A total of 494 adults with biplanar EOS X-ray scanning were included in this study and divided into health and deformity group according to the presence of spinal deformity. The proposed method of quasi-automatic 3D measurement was applied to all these subjects. The radiographic parameters included: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) in sagittal plane, and cobb angle in coronal plane. Comparison was made between quasi-automatic and manual measurement. The mean age was 53.7±19.9 years old. In the whole population, the mean differences between the two methods were 3.9° for TK (30.5°±9.9° vs. 26.5°±9.3°, P<0.001), -5.2° for LL (-47.5°±11.2° vs. -42.4°±11.0°, P<0.001), 3.6° for PI (46.9°±10.3° vs. 43.9°±10.3°, P<0.001), -0.2° for PT (11.9°±7.7° vs. 12.0°±8.2°, P=0.328), -2.1 mm for SVA (15.7±26.2 vs. 17.8±26.3 mm, P=0.221) and -1.1° for TPA (9.0°±7.6° vs. 10.1°±7.8°, P=0.051). The deformity group had similar mean differences with the asymptomatic group with the values ranged from -4.1° to 3.8° for sagittal parameters. The mean differences of Cobb angle were 1.9° for patients with Cobb angle <30° and 2.3° for patients with Cobb angle >30°, respectively. Correlation analysis showed r2 for all clinical parameters ranged from 0.667 to 0.923. On average, the new method takes 5 minutes to compute all the parameters for one case. In conclusion, this ergonomic and efficient quasi-automatic method for full spine proved fast and accurate measurement in a large population, which showed great potential in extensive clinical application.

Methods for characterization and optimisation of measuring performance of stereoscopic x-ray systems with image intensifiers

The use of biplanar high-speed x-ray fluoroscopy to study fast, 3D movements that are inaccessible from external views has grown significantly in the past decade. Owing to the development of specialised software for calibration, distortion correction, and automated tracking of radio-opaque marker implants, this technique will soon become the standard to analyse skeletal kinematics of vertebrate animals. However, tests of important characteristics of biplanar x-ray systems, such as resolution and precision, remain scarce and incomplete. We present methods to determine imaging resolution and 3D stereoscopic and dynamic resolutions to follow moving markers in 3D, and demonstrate them on a newly installed stereoscopic x-ray system with image intensifiers. Using four-megapixel cameras, image resolution slightly surpasses previous reports. The spatial resolution appears to be optimal at magnification factors (ratio of source-to-detector to source-to-subject distance) between 1.33 and 2.20. This new information will allow biplanar x-ray system users to optimise the relative position of tube, subject, and image intensifiers.

A novel non-invasive method for measuring knee joint laxity in four dof: In vitro proof-of-concept and validation

Knee joint laxity or instability is a common problem that may have detrimental consequences for patients. Unfortunately, assessment of knee joint laxity is limited by current methodologies resulting in suboptimal diagnostics and treatment. This paper presents a novel method for accurately measuring non-invasive knee joint laxity in four degrees-of-freedom (DOF). An arthrometer, combining a parallel manipulator and a six-axis force/moment sensor, was developed to be used in combination with a low-dose biplanar x-ray system and 3D image data to reconstruct tibiofemoral position and orientation of laxity measurements.As proof-of-concept, four cadaveric knees were tested in the device. Each cadaveric knee was mounted in the device at approximately 30° of flexion and twelve monoplanar anteroposterior, mediolateral and internal/external load cases were applied. Additionally, four biplanar load cases were applied, consisting of different combinations of anteroposterior and internal/external loads. The arthrometer was limited to four DOF to address the specific measurements. For validation purposes, the pose reconstructions of tibia and femur were compared with pose reconstructions of bone pin marker frames mounted on each bone.The measurements from the arthrometer in terms of translation and rotations displayed comparable values to what have previously been presented in the literature. Furthermore, the measurements revealed coupled motions in multiple planes, demonstrating the importance of multi DOF laxity measurements. The validation displayed an average mean difference for translations of 0.08 mm and an average limit of agreement between −1.64 mm and 1.80 mm. The average mean difference for rotations was 0.10° and the limit of agreement was between −0.85° and 1.05°.The presented method eliminates several limitations present in current methods and may prove a valuable tool for assessing knee joint laxity.

Measuring physiological and pathological femoral anteversion using a biplanar low-dose X-ray system: validity, reliability, and discriminative ability in cerebral palsy.

The aims of this study were to evaluate the concurrent validity and reliability of a low-dose biplanar X-ray system (Ld-BPR) for the measurement of femoral anteversion (FA) by comparing Ld-BPR-based three-dimensional measures with CT-scan-based measures and to assess the discriminative ability of this method in children with cerebral palsy. Fifty dry femora were scanned using both a CT scan and the Ld-BPR system. Ten femora were artificially modified to mimic a range of anteversion from -30° to +60° and scanned by both modalities. FA was quantified using the images from both modalities and statistically compared for concurrent validity. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Ld-BPR system was also determined. Further, Ld-BPR data from 16 hemiplegic and 22 diplegic children were analyzed for its discriminative ability. The concurrent validity between the Ld-BPR and CT-scan measures was excellent (R (2) = 0.83-0.84) and no significant differences were found. The intra- and inter-trial reliability were excellent (ICCs = 0.98 and 0.97) with limits of agreement of (-2.28°; +2.65°) and (-2.76°; +3.38°) respectively. Further, no significant effects of angle or method were found in the sample of modified femora. Ld-BPR measures for FA were significantly different between healthy and impaired femora. The excellent concurrent validity with the CT scan modality, the excellent reliability, and the ability to discriminate pathological conditions evaluated by this study make this radiological method suitable for a validated use across hospitals and research institutes.

Alignment of centers of mass of body segments with the gravity line

Sagittal malalignment is associated with increased disability and can lead to postural troubles. The latter is often the result of an inadequate weight distribution on the spine and trigger compensatory mechanisms. No study to date has provided reference values for the alignment of centers of mass (CoM) of different body segments in asymptomatic subjects. The use of a bi-planar X-ray system (Dubousset et al. 2010) combined with 3D reconstruction of the external body shape (Nerot et al. 2015) allows for computation of the body segments’ CoM. The aim of this study was to provide baseline values for the position of each segment’s CoM compared to the gravity line (GL) in the sagittal plane.

Reliability of a New Method for Evaluating Femoral Stem Positioning After Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Stereoradiographic 3D Reconstruction

The goal of this study was to validate a new method for determining femoral stem positioning based on 3D models derived from the EOS biplanar system. Independents observers measured stem anteversion and femoral offset using CT scan and EOS system of 28 femoral stems implanted in composite femurs. In parallel, the same parameters were measured on biplanar lower limb radiographs acquired from 30 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. CT scanner and biplanar X-ray measurements on composite femurs were highly correlated: 0.94 for femoral offset (P < 0.01), 0.98 for stem anteversion (P < 0.01). The inter and intra-observer reproducibility when measuring composite bones was excellent with both imaging modalities as when measuring femoral stem positioning in patients with the biplanar X-ray system.

Three-dimensional reconstructions for asymptomatic and cerebral palsy children's lower limbs using a biplanar X-ray system: A feasibility study

The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility of 3D subject-specific skeletal reconstructions of lower limb in children using stereoradiography, and to assess uncertainty of clinical and anatomical parameters for children with cerebral palsy and for healthy children. The stereoradiography technique, using the EOS® system (Eos-imaging®), is based on the acquisition of two simultaneous digital anteroposterior and lateral X-rays, from head to feet in standing position and at low radiation dose. This technique allows subject-specific skeletal 3D reconstructions. Five children with cerebral palsy (CP) and 5 typically developing children (TD) were included in the study. Two operators performed the lower limb reconstructions twice. Tridimensional reconstructions were feasible for children over the age of 5 years. The study of reproducibility of anatomical parameters defining skeletal alignment showed uncertainties under 3° for the neck shaft angle, the femoral mechanical angle, and for the femoral and tibial torsions. The maximum degree of uncertainty was obtained for the femoral tibial rotation (4° for healthy children and 3.5° for children with CP).

Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography

To compare the radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort, and financial break-even of a standard digital radiography and a biplanar low-dose X-ray system. A standard digital radiography system (Ysio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) was compared with a biplanar X-ray unit (EOS, EOS imaging, Paris, France) consisting of two X-ray tubes and slot-scanning detectors, arranged at an angle of 90° allowing simultaneous vertical biplanar linear scanning in the upright patient position. We compared data of standing full-length lower limb radiographs and whole spine radiographs of both X-ray systems. Dose-area product was significantly lower for radiographs of the biplanar X-ray system than for the standard digital radiography system (e.g. whole spine radiographs; standard digital radiography system: 392.2 ± 231.7 cGy*cm(2) versus biplanar X-ray system: 158.4 ± 103.8 cGy*cm(2)). The mean examination time was significantly shorter for biplanar radiographs compared with standard digital radiographs (e.g. whole spine radiographs: 449 s vs 248 s). Patients' comfort regarding noise was significantly higher for the standard digital radiography system. The financial break-even point was 2,602 radiographs/year for the standard digital radiography system compared with 4,077 radiographs/year for the biplanar X-ray unit. The biplanar X-ray unit reduces radiation exposure and increases subjective noise exposure to patients. The biplanar X-ray unit demands a higher number of examinations per year for the financial break-even point, despite the lower labour cost per examination due to the shorter examination time.

Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction

Several clinical and radiological techniques have been described to assess lower limb length and angle measurements. None of them has yet met the ideal criteria for a reliable, reproducible, safe, and inexpensive system. In this context, a new biplanar X-ray system (EOS™, EOS imaging, Paris, France) makes it possible to obtain a 3D reconstruction of the lower extremities from two 2D orthogonal radiographic images, with associated calculation of 3D measurements. The reliability of this technique has never been documented on adults. Lower limb measurements produced by the 3D EOS™ reconstruction system are reproducible regarding inter- and intraobserver assessment and more reliable with this 3D technique than when they are obtained from 2D measurements. This study included 25 patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (50lower limbs). Two independent observers made all measurements twice, both on the 2D frontal radiograph and using 3D reconstructions (femoral measurements of length, offset, neck shaft angle, neck length, and head diameter, as well as the tibia length, limb length, HKA and HKS). Reproducibility was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficients. Both the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the EOS™ measurements was excellent; more specifically inter- and intraobserver reproducibility was 0.997 and 0.997 for femoral length, 0.996 and 0.995 for tibial length, 0.999 and 0.999 for limb length, 0.894 and 0.891 for HKS, 0.993 and 0.994 for HKA, 0.870 and 0.845 for femoral offset, and 0.765 and 0.851 for neck shaft angle. For most of the variables, the interobserver correlations were statistically better with the EOS™ 3D reconstruction. Our results show that the EOS™ systems allow reproducible lower limb measurements. Furthermore, 3D EOS™ reconstructions offer better reproducible measures for most of the parameters than radiographic 2D projection. Its use before deciding on surgery and during planning for lower limb arthroplasty appears essential to us. Level III: diagnostic prospective study on consecutive patients.

Angle Measurement Reproducibility Using EOSThree-Dimensional Reconstructions in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Posterior Instrumentation

A reproducibility study was conducted in preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional (3D) measurements for patients operated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). To assess the reliability of preoperative and postoperative 3D reconstructions using EOS in patients operated for AIS. No prior reliability study of 3D measurements has been performed in the literature for severe scoliosis and for operated patients. This series included 24 patients (62° ± 11) operated for Lenke 1 or 2 AIS, using either all-pedicle screw constructs (group 1) or hybrid constructs, with universal clamps at thoracic levels (group 2). All patients underwent low-dose standing biplanar radiographs, pre- and postoperatively. Three operators performed the 3D reconstruction process two times preoperatively and two times postoperatively (total 288 reconstructions). Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility were calculated and compared between groups. The preoperative reproducibility was between 4° and 6.5° for parameters dedicated to scoliosis (Cobb and apical vertebral rotation), between 4° and 7° for kyphosis and lordosis values, and between 1° and 5° for pelvic measurements. The postoperative reproducibility was between 5° and 8° for values of kyphosis and lordosis, between 1° and 5.5° for pelvic parameters, and between 6.5° and 10.5° for the scoliotic parameters. The reproducibility of the scoliotic parameters was slightly better in the hybrid construct group, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.8). No difference was found between groups for the other parameters. 3D postoperative reconstructions are as reproducible as preoperative ones. The reproducibility is not influenced by the type of implant used for correction. Mean difference between operator was higher than previously reported for the apical rotation measurement, but this difference can be explained by the severity of the curves and the lower visibility of the anatomical landmarks due to the implants.

Comparing three attachment systems used to determine knee kinematics during gait

This work compared three attachment systems (AS) designed to minimize soft tissue artefacts in gait analysis measurements. The systems’ displacement for different knee flexion angles and after 50 gait cycles was investigated using an EOS ® low dose biplanar X-ray system. Eighteen subjects (six per AS) were equipped with one AS and placed in five positions. Frontal and profile views were taken for each position. The bones’ 3D model and the AS's position were obtained from stereoradiographic reconstructions. The AS's relative position to the underlying bone were computed and interpreted in the anatomical coordinate systems (CS). The AS appeared to be stable in the frontal and sagittal plane (under 1.5° average displacement around the underlying bones) but unstable in the axial plane (over 6° average displacement). The average translation along the femoral and tibial diaphysis was 4.5 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively. Femoral system B translated significantly less along the diaphysis than the other AS. Concerning the axial rotation, system C appeared to present the most important displacement but there was no statistically significant difference. Systems A and B's rotation in the transverse plane correlated to the knee flexion angle. For the tibia, system B was more stable than systems A and C ( p = 0.04). On the whole, system B appeared to be the most stable system. This study highlights the fact that no system can limit displacement in the transverse plane.

Error analysis of a system for measuring three-dimensional joint motion.

In the past ten years there has been increased use of six-degree-of-freedom instrumented spatial linkages for the measurement of biological joint motions. In spite of the increased popularity, little information has been reported on the accuracy of these devices. In this paper, we present a two-part investigation of the accuracy of the instrumented spatial linkage when used to measure knee joint kinematics. In the first part, we present the results of a theoretical analysis and an experimental determination of the errors associated with spatial linkage systems. In the second part, we describe the errors associated with a bi-planar X-ray system used to obtain the coordinate transformation between the linkage ends and coordinate systems located in the bones comprising the joint. We found that the theoretical error analysis consistently overestimated the actual measurement error, thus providing an unreliable estimate of errors. The experimental study of both the linkage system and the bi-planar X-ray system demonstrated that the accuracy of displacement measurement is insensitive to large systematic errors in position measurement.