Resume The addition of an ozonation step followed by a second stage biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration to a conventional treatment (coagulation–flocculation, settling and sand–anthracite filtration) has been identified as a good mean for controlling chlorination by-product precursors. Lately, the addition of an ozonation step before filtration and the replacement of sand–anthracite filtration by sand-BAC filtration has been proposed as an economical solution when retrofitting treatment plants. The accumulation of flocs and particulate matter in first stage sand-BAC filters may cause nevertheless some problems of substrate or oxygen diffusion to the biomass fixed on the BAC. The main objectives of this study were to verify the impact of flocs/particle accumulation in first stage sand-BAC filters by: (1) studying the effects of filter backwash on the removal of chlorination by-product precursors; (2) comparing the efficiency of sand-BAC filtration with that of first stage sand–anthracite filtration and second stage BAC filtration. Figure Fig. 1 shows the flow chart of the pilot facilities used for this study. The raw water, from the Mille-iles River, was settled in the St. Rose filtration plant (nominal capacity of 110,000 m 3 /d). This settled water was then pumped to the pilot plant (nominal capacity of 48 m 3 /d) where it was ozonated in two sequential ozone reactors. The ozonated water stream was then split by open weirs to three filtration trains. Four pilot filters were used: two replicate first stage sand-BAC filters (filtres sable–CAB #1 and sable–CAB #2), one first stage sand–anthracite filter (filtre SA) followed by one second stage BAC filter (filtre CAB). Table Table 1 shows the design and the operational parameters of the filters. Properties of filter media are described in Table Table 2 . Table Table 3 shows additional sampling information. Analytical monitoring included chlorine demand, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), ammonia, hexane extractable disinfection by-product precursors (HEDBPp) and haloacetic acid precursors (HAAp). Table Table 5 indicates the HEDBPp and the HAAp measured. All these parameters were measured on water samples taken at different filter depths according to empty bed contact time (EBCT). Results showed that floc and particle accumulation in first stage sand-BAC filters impaired the removal of some chlorination by-product precursors, such as HAAp which are considered to be easily biodegradable. Fortunately, filter backwash restored these removals. Chloropicrin precursors were also identified as being easily removed in biological filters when compared to the biodegradation kinetics of dissolved organic carbon. Chloroform and trichloropropanone precursors were found to be removed as the global pool of dissolved organic carbon. The replacement of first stage sand–anthracite filter by sand-BAC filter and the addition of an interozonation step could improve the quality of the water produced by the treatment plant. In fact, this study showed that sand–anthracite filtration was not suitable for the removal of chlorine demand, chloroform precursors, chloropicrin precursors and trichloropropanone precursors. Furthermore, the water quality of the effluent of first stage sand-BAC filtration and of BAC filtration was shown to be very similar. However, the coagulation–floculation step must be enhanced in a manner to prevent the accumulation of flocs and particulate matter in first stage sand-BAC filters. Results also suggested that the potential of removal of biodegradable precursors of chlorination by-products is limited and should be part of a global strategy including the optimisation of natural organic matter removal by other treatment processes (coagulation, settling, membranes).