Nobori Biolimus-eluting Stent Research Articles

Clinical outcomes three-year after revascularization with biodegradable polymer stents: ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent versus biolimus-eluting stent: from the Scandinavian organization for randomized trials with clinical outcome VII trial.

Drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers have been designed to improve safety and efficacy. However, drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers may not be a class effect, as stent strut thickness, polymer coating, and drug resorption differ between these groups of stents. Twelve months results of Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome VII showed that ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent was noninferior to the biolimus-eluting Nobori stent. The sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent was associated with a reduced risk of definite stent thrombosis. The Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome VII trial is a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent and biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in all-comers patients. The endpoint target lesion failure was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (not related to other than index lesion) and target lesion revascularization. A total of 1261 patients were randomized to treatment with sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent and 1264 patients to biolimus-eluting Nobori stent and followed for 3 years. At 3-year the target lesion failure was comparable for sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (9.0%) and the biolimus-eluting Nobori stent (9.1%), (rate ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.29). Cardiac death (sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent 3.0% vs. biolimus-eluting Nobori stent 2.6% [rate ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.86]), target lesion revascularization (sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent 5.2% vs. biolimus-eluting Nobori stent 5.9% [rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.25]), myocardial infarction (sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent 4.7% vs. biolimus-eluting Nobori stent 4.5% [rate ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.50]), and definite stent thrombosis (sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent 1.0% vs. biolimus-eluting Nobori stent 1.7% [rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-1.18]) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At 3-year follow-up, target lesion failure did not differ among ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent and biolimus-eluting Nobori stent with biodegradable polymers.

Mid-term outcome of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer: results from a multinational prospective 'all-comers' registry.

The Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (BES) is a biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (DES). Several studies have shown its noninferiority in comparison with durable polymer DES. We sought to investigate the efficacy and the safety of Nobori BES in an all-comer population undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 12 912 patients with 19 947 coronary lesions, undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with Nobori BES implantation at 200 centres around the world between August 2010 and December 2015, were included in this prospective registry. Patients were stratified into four groups according to the total stent length, with cutoffs at 18, 24 and 28 mm. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1 year. At 1 year, the major adverse cardiac events rate was the highest (4.6%) in the fourth quartile of stent length (>28 mm), whereas the overall rate of the primary endpoint in the all cohort was 3.5%. Both target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates were significantly higher in patients with longer stent length was implanted (all P<0.05). The incidence of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 1 year was 0.5% in all cohort and similar across the four groups (varying from 0.4 to 0.7%, all P=NS). Our data confirmed the efficacy and the safety of the Nobori BES in routine clinical practice. Longer stent length is associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiac events, and yet, this risk is comparable with that of other DES.

Previous cerebrovascular disease is an important predictor of clinical outcomes in elderly patients with percutaneous coronary interventions: The Nobori-Biolimus eluting stent prospective multicenter 1-year observational registry in South Korea.

Objective:The appropriate selection of elderly patients for revascularization has become increasingly important because these subsets of patients are more likely to experience a major cardiac or cerebrovascular event—percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this study was to determine important independent risk factor for predicting clinical outcomes in the elderly patients after successful PCI, particularly in a series of South Korean population.Methods:This study is prospective, multicenter, observational cross-sectional study. A total of 1,884 consecutive patients who underwent successful PCI with Nobori® Biolimus A9-eluting stents were enrolled between April 2010 and December 2012. They were divided into two groups according to the age: patients <75 years old (younger patient group) and ≥75 years old (elderly patient group). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year after index PCI.Results:The 1-year cumulative incidence of MACCE (12.9% vs. 4.3%, p<0.001) and total death (7.1% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001) was significantly higher in the elderly group than in younger group. Previous cerebrovascular disease was significantly correlated with MACCE in elderly patients 1-year after PCI (hazard ratio, 2.804; 95% confidence interval, 1.290–6.093 p=0.009).Conclusion:Previous cerebrovascular disease is important independent predictor of the MACCE in elderly patients at 1-year after PCI with Nobori® Biolimus A9-eluting stents especially in a series of South Korean population. Therefore, careful PCI with intensive monitoring and management can improve major clinical outcomes after successful PCI in elderly patients with previous cerebrovascular disease compared with younger patients.

TCT-292 Three-year clinical outcome of patients treated with the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent and Xience/Promus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent for unprotected left main disease

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate 3-year clinical outcome of patients treated with the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (BES) compared to those with the Xience/Promus cobalt-chromium...

TCT-70 Final 5 year results from the COMPARE II trial: comparison between the durable polymer coated everolimus-eluting Xience/Promus stent and the biodegradable polymer coated biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in all comer population

In an attempt to overcome unwanted late effects with first generation DES, DES with biodegradable polymers (BP) or more biocompatible durable polymers (DP) have been developed. The LEADERS trial was the first to show that the concept of BP significantly reduced very late stent thrombosis compared to

Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Coronary drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers have been designed to improve safety and efficacy. The Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome (SORT OUT) VII trial-a large-scale registry-based randomized, multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, noninferiority trial-compared 2 biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents: the thin-strut cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent and the stainless steel biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in an all-comer patient population. The primary end point target lesion failure was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (not related to other than index lesion), or target lesion revascularization within 1 year, analyzed by intention to treat (noninferiority margin of 3.0%). Clinically driven event detection based on Danish registries was used. A total of 1261 patients were assigned to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent (1590 lesions) and 1264 patients to the biolimus-eluting stent (1588 lesions). At 1 year, the composite end point target lesion failure occurred in 48 patients (3.8%) in the sirolimus-eluting group and in 58 patients (4.6%) in the biolimus-eluting group (absolute risk difference, -0.78% [upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 0.61%]; P<0.0001). Rates of definite stent thrombosis occurred in 5 (0.4%) of the sirolimus-eluting group compared with 15 (1.2%) biolimus-eluting stent-treated patients (rate ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.92; P=0.034), which largely was attributable to a lower risk of subacute definite stent thrombosis: 0.1% versus 0.6% (rate ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.00; P=0.05). The thin-strut sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent was noninferior to the biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in unselected patients for target lesion failure at 1 year. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01879358.

Differences of side branch jailing between left main-left anterior descending artery stenting and left main-left circumflex artery stenting with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent.

The aim of this study is to indicate differences of side branch jailing between the left main (LM)-left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenting and the LM-left circumflex artery (LCx) stenting. Thirty-one patients who underwent single-stenting using a two-link ten-crowns biolimus-eluting stent (Japanese design of BES, J-BES) and subsequent kissing balloon dilation (KBD) on an LM bifurcation with optical coherence tomography (OCT) were divided into two groups according to the stented vessel. Bifurcation angles were measured by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary analysis. The jailing pattern on a side branch ostium was evaluated by stent-enhanced 3D-OCT. Incomplete stent apposition (ISA) after KBD was compared between the stented vessels. The to-be-stented angle of the LM-LCx stenting (n=11) was significantly steeper than that of the LM-LAD stenting (n=20) (132.6°±16.9° vs. 150.7°±10.6°, p<0.01). The incidence of the free carina type, which has no stent links bridging from a carina, in the LM-LCx stenting was significantly higher than that in the LM-LAD stenting (90.9 vs. 45.0%, p=0.02). The percentage of ISA at the bifurcation segment in the LM-LCx stenting was significantly smaller than that in the LM-LAD stenting (4.4±8.2 vs. 12.7±9.2%, p=0.0003). This study showed, by higher incidence of the favorable configuration, that the LM-LCx stenting achieved a smaller percentage of ISA than the LM-LAD stenting. These insights may help guide LM bifurcation stenting with J-BES.

TCT-559 Long-term Clinical and Angiographic Impact of Stent Fracture on Second Generation Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison between Xience Everolimus- and Nobori Biolimus-eluting Stents

Stent fracture (SF) after drug-eluting stent implantation has been reported to be associated with in-stent restenosis (ISR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis. This study aimed to assess the long-term clinical and angiographic impact of SF on Xience everolimus-eluting stent

Randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent with a biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and study design of the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome VII trial

Third-generation coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) with biodegradable polymers have been designed to improve safety and efficacy. We designed a large scale registry-based randomized clinical trial to compare 2 third-generation DES: a thin strut, cobalt-chromium DES with silicon carbide-coating releasing sirolimus from a biodegradable polymer (O-SES, Orsiro; Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland) with the stainless steel biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting Nobori stents (N-BES, Nobori; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) in an all-comer patient population. The multicenter SORT OUT VII trial (NCT01879358) randomly assigned 2,530 patients to treatment with biodegradable polymer O-SES or biodegradable polymer N-BES at 3 sites in Western Denmark. Patients were eligible, if they were ≥18 years old; had chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes; and ≥1 coronary lesion with >50% diameter stenosis, requiring treatment with a DES. The primary end point target lesion failure is a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (not related to other than index lesion), or target lesion revascularization within 12 months. Clinically, driven event detection based on Danish registries will be used. An event rate of 6.5% is assumed in each stent group. With a sample size of 1,157 patients in each treatment arm, a 2-group large-sample normal approximation test of proportions with a 1-sided 5% significance level will have 90% power to detect noninferiority of the O-SES compared with the N-BES with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 3.0%. The SORT OUT VII trial will determine whether the biodegradable polymers O-SES is noninferior to the N-BES with respect to driven event.

Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: Meta-analysis of randomized trials

BackgroundsThe Nobori is a new-generation, biodegradable-polymer coated, biolimus-eluting stent (BES) that has recently been investigated in several randomized trials with inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Nobori BES versus other drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MethodsWe undertook a meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating Nobori BES versus other DES. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), respectively. Secondary outcomes were the composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI)/target vessel revascularization (TVR), MI and death. ResultsA total of 9114 PCI-patients randomly received Nobori BES (n=5080) or other DES (n=4034). This latter group comprised patients receiving everolimus- (n=2533), sirolimus- (n=1376) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (n=125). Median follow-up was 11months [interquartile range 9–12]. The Nobori BES versus other DES showed comparable risk of TLR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.91 [0.57–1.46], p=0.71). There was significant heterogeneity across trials due to significant lower TLR risk with Nobori BES versus paclitaxel-eluting stent (0.32 [0.10–0.98], p=0.046; p for interaction=0.009). Nobori BES versus other DES showed comparable risk of definite/probable ST (1.40 [0.66–2.97], p=0.39), cardiac death/MI/TVR (1.05 [0.88–1.25], p=0.59), MI (1.13 [0.87–1.48], p=0.37) and death (1.09 [0.81–1.48], p=0.56). ConclusionsNobori BES has comparable efficacy with other limus-eluting stents at 1-year follow-up. There is no difference in terms of safety profile between these stent platforms.

Randomised comparison of strut coverage between Nobori biolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography analysis

The aims of this study were to compare strut tissue coverage at six-month follow-up after Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (N-BES) versus sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. A total of 120 patients with a single stenotic lesion requiring revascularisation were randomly assigned to either N-BES (n=60) or SES (n=60). Baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed post stent implantation, and follow-up OCT was scheduled at six months. Post-intervention and follow-up OCT analyses were available in 51 (85.0%) and 52 (86.7%) patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was the percentage of uncovered struts at follow-up OCT in all cross-sections with analysis of 0.2 mm longitudinal intervals. In addition, an OCT contour plot analysis was constructed to investigate the distribution patterns of uncovered struts. The percentage of uncovered struts of N-BES was significantly lower versus SES (15.9±12.2% versus 25.1±18.3%, respectively, p=0.003). N-BES showed a greater NIH thickness than SES (median [interquartile range] 52.4 μm [41.9-74.9] versus 42.1 μm [30.6-56.0], p=0.005). Contour plot analyses showed a lower incidence of a diffuse distribution pattern of uncovered struts (46.8% versus 75.0%, respectively, p=0.022). This randomised OCT study showed that N-BES had a significantly lower percentage of uncovered struts, and less common diffuse distribution pattern of uncovered struts versus SES.

TCT-840 Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: meta-analysis of randomized trials

TCT-840 Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: meta-analysis of randomized trials

TCT-630 Vascular Response to Biolimus-eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have an increased risk of incomplete stent apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation. The vascular response was assessed after treatment with the third generation biolimus-eluting Nobori stent with biodegradable polymer compared

Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer-coated stent versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT V): a randomised non-inferiority trial

Third-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents might reduce the risk of stent thrombosis compared with first-generation permanent polymer drug-eluting stents. We aimed to further investigate the effects of a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent compared with a durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in a population-based setting. This randomised, multicentre, all-comer, non-inferiority trial was undertaken at three sites across western Denmark. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and at least one coronary artery lesion (>50% diameter stenosis). We randomly assigned patients (1:1) using an independently managed computer-generated allocation sequence to receive either a biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer stent (Nobori, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) or a sirolimus-eluting permanent polymer stent (Cypher Select Plus, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ, USA). The primary endpoint was a composite of safety (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis) and efficacy (target vessel revascularisation) at 9 months, analysed by intention to treat (non-inferiority margin of 0·02). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01254981. From July, 2009, to January, 2011, we assigned 1229 patients (1532 lesions) to receive the biolimus-eluting stent and 1239 (1555 lesions) to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent. One patient was lost to follow-up because of emigration. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 50 (4·1%) patients who were assigned the biolimus-eluting stent and 39 (3·1%) who were assigned the sirolimus-eluting stent met the primary endpoint (risk difference 0·9% [upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 2·1%]; p(non-inferiority)=0·06). Significantly more patients in the biolimus-eluting stent group had definite stent thrombosis at 12 months than did those in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (9 [0·7%] vs 2 [0·2%], risk difference 0·6% [95% CI 0·0-1·1]; p=0·034). Per-protocol analysis showed that 45 (3·8%) of 1193 patients who received a biolimus-eluting stent and 39 (3·2%) of 1208 who received a sirolimus-eluting stent met the primary endpoint (risk difference 0·5% [upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 1·8%]; p(non-inferiority)=0·03). At 1 year follow-up, the biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting Nobori stent did not improve clinical results compared with a first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent. We will need to obtain long-term data before we can make recommendations for the role of this biolimus-eluting stent in routine clinical practice. Terumo and Cordis (Johnson & Johnson).