Biogenesis Of Non-coding RNAs Research Articles

The interplay between epitranscriptomic RNA modifications and neurodegenerative disorders: Mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic strategies

AbstractNeurodegenerative disorders encompass a group of age‐related conditions characterized by the gradual decline in both the structure and functionality of the central nervous system (CNS). RNA modifications, arising from the epitranscriptome or RNA‐modifying protein mutations, have recently been observed to contribute significantly to neurodegenerative disorders. Specific modifications like N6‐methyladenine (m6A), N1‐methyladenine (m1A), 5‐methylcytosine (m5C), pseudouridine and adenosine‐to‐inosine (A‐to‐I) play key roles, with their regulators serving as crucial therapeutic targets. These epitranscriptomic changes intricately control gene expression, influencing cellular functions and contributing to disease pathology. Dysregulation of RNA metabolism, affecting mRNA processing and noncoding RNA biogenesis, is a central factor in these diseases. This review underscores the complex relationship between RNA modifications and neurodegenerative disorders, emphasizing the influence of RNA modification and the epitranscriptome, exploring the function of RNA modification enzymes in neurodegenerative processes, investigating the functional consequences of RNA modifications within neurodegenerative pathways, and evaluating the potential therapeutic advancements derived from assessing the epitranscriptome.

C-phycocyanin reinforces autophagy to block pulmonary fibrogenesis by inhibiting lncIAPF biogenesis

Pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic and irreversible progressive lung disease caused by various factors, such as age and environmental pollution. With countries stepping into an aging society and the seriousness of environmental pollution caused by global industrialization, the incidence of pulmonary fibrosis is annually increasing. However, no effective drug is available for pulmonary fibrosis treatment. C-phycocyanin (C-PC), extracted from blue-green algae, has good water solubility and antioxidation. This study elucidated that C-PC reinforces autophagy to block pulmonary fibrogenesis by inhibiting long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) biogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Cleavage under targets and release using nuclease (CUT & RUN)-PCR, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), and nuclear–cytoplasmic separation experiments clarified that C-PC blocked the nuclear translocation of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) to prevent the binding between ATF3 and transcription factor Smad3, thereby hindering lncIAPF transcription. Human antigen R (HuR) truncation experiment and RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) were then performed to identify the binding domain with lncIAPF in the 244–322 aa of HuR. lncIAPF exerted its profibrogenic function through the binding protein HuR, a negative regulator of autophagy. In summary, C-PC promoted autophagy via down-regulating the lncIAPF–HuR-mediated signal pathway to alleviate pulmonary fibrosis, showing its potential as a drug for treating pulmonary fibrosis. Exploring how C-PC interacts with biological molecules will help us understand the mechanism of this drug and provide valuable target genes to design new drugs.

Epigenetic Modifications in Genome Help Remembering the Stress Tolerance Strategy Adopted by the Plant.

Genetic information in eukaryotic organisms is stored, replicated, transcribed, and inherited through the nucleus of a cell. Epigenetic modifications in the genetic material, including DNA methylation, histone modification, changes in non-coding RNA (ncRNA) biogenesis, and chromatin architecture play important roles in determining the genomic landscape and regulating gene expression. Genome architecture (structural features of chromatin, affected by epigenetic modifications) is a major driver of genomic functions/activities. Segregation of euchromatin (transcriptionally active) from heterochromatin (transcriptionally repressed chromosome) and positioning of genes in specific nuclear space in eukaryotic cells emphasise non-randomness in the organization of the genetic information. Not only does the base sequence of a gene carry the genetic information but the covalent modifications of bases, three-dimensional positioning of the genome, and chromatin loops are vital for switching on/off the gene and regulating its expression during growth/environmental stress. The epigenetic dynamics depend on the activities of writers and erasers under changing environmental conditions. The discovery of non-coding RNAs (one of the players in de novo methylation of DNA), increased DNA methylation protein (guide for the DNA demethylase), and methylation monitoring sequence (that helps keep a balance between DNA demethylation and methylation) have been some of the new developments in the era of epigenomics. To respond to environmental stimuli, plants depend on modulating gene expression through different mechanisms including biochemical, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic alterations. Studies on plants might provide better insights into epigenetic stress memory and molecular bases of adaptability to enable (epi)genome editing of crops for climate resilience and sustainable agriculture in the present era of multifaceted climate change.

Frontiers and Challenges of Computing ncRNAs Biogenesis, Function and Modulation.

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), generated from nonprotein coding DNA sequences, constitute 98-99% of the human genome. Non-coding RNAs encompass diverse functional classes, including microRNAs, small interfering RNAs, PIWI-interacting RNAs, small nuclear RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs, and long non-coding RNAs. With critical involvement in gene expression and regulation across various biological and physiopathological contexts, such as neuronal disorders, immune responses, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer, non-coding RNAs are emerging as disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets. In this review, after providing an overview of non-coding RNAs' role in cell homeostasis, we illustrate the potential and the challenges of state-of-the-art computational methods exploited to study non-coding RNAs biogenesis, function, and modulation. This can be done by directly targeting them with small molecules or by altering their expression by targeting the cellular engines underlying their biosynthesis. Drawing from applications, also taken from our work, we showcase the significance and role of computer simulations in uncovering fundamental facets of ncRNA mechanisms and modulation. This information may set the basis to advance gene modulation tools and therapeutic strategies to address unmet medical needs.

Crosstalk Between m6A RNA Methylation and miRNA Biogenesis in Cancer: An Unholy Nexus.

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is one of the most prevalent internal reversible chemical modification of RNAs in eukaryotes, which has attracted widespread attention recently owing to its regulatory roles in a plethora of normal developmental processes and human diseases like cancer. Deposition of the m6A mark on RNAs is mediated by the dynamic interplay between m6A regulatory proteins such as m6A RNA methyltransferases (m6A writers), m6A RNA demethylases (m6A erasers) and m6A RNA binding proteins (m6A readers). m6A regulators are ectopically expressed in various cancer types, often leading to aberrant expression of tumor-suppressor and oncogenic mRNAs either directly or indirectly via regulating the biogenesis of non-coding RNAs like miRNAs. miRNAs are tiny regulators of gene expression, which often impact various hallmarks of cancer and thus influence tumorigenesis. It is becoming increasingly clear that m6A RNA modification impacts biogenesis and function of miRNAs, and recent studies have interestingly, uncovered many miRNAs whose biogenesis and function are regulated by m6A writers, erasers and readers. In this review, we discuss various mechanisms by which m6A RNA methylation regulates miRNA biogenesis, the functional crosstalk between m6A RNA methylation and miRNAs and how it modulates various aspects of tumorigenesis. The potential of m6A RNA methylation regulated miRNAs as biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets to treat various cancers is also addressed.

Targeting Ribonucleases with Small Molecules and Bifunctional Molecules.

Ribonucleases (RNases) cleave and process RNAs, thereby regulating the biogenesis, metabolism, and degradation of coding and noncoding RNAs. Thus, small molecules targeting RNases have the potential to perturb RNA biology, and RNases have been studied as therapeutic targets of antibiotics, antivirals, and agents for autoimmune diseases and cancers. Additionally, the recent advances in chemically induced proximity approaches have led to the discovery of bifunctional molecules that target RNases to achieve RNA degradation or inhibit RNA processing. Here, we summarize the efforts that have been made to discover small-molecule inhibitors and activators targeting bacterial, viral, and human RNases. We also highlight the emerging examples of RNase-targeting bifunctional molecules and discuss the trends in developing such molecules for both biological and therapeutic applications.

Biogenesis, Mode of Action and the Interactions of Plant Non-Coding RNAs.

The central dogma of genetics, which outlines the flow of genetic information from DNA to RNA to protein, has long been the guiding principle in molecular biology. In fact, more than three-quarters of the RNAs produced by transcription of the plant genome are not translated into proteins, and these RNAs directly serve as non-coding RNAs in the regulation of plant life activities at the molecular level. The breakthroughs in high-throughput transcriptome sequencing technology and the establishment and improvement of non-coding RNA experiments have now led to the discovery and confirmation of the biogenesis, mechanisms, and synergistic effects of non-coding RNAs. These non-coding RNAs are now predicted to play important roles in the regulation of gene expression and responses to stress and evolution. In this review, we focus on the synthesis, and mechanisms of non-coding RNAs, and we discuss their impact on gene regulation in plants.

Small Non-Coding RNAs in Human Cancer.

Small non-coding RNAs are widespread in the biological world and have been extensively explored over the past decades. Their fundamental roles in human health and disease are increasingly appreciated. Furthermore, a growing number of studies have investigated the functions of small non-coding RNAs in cancer initiation and progression. In this review, we provide an overview of the biogenesis of small non-coding RNAs with a focus on microRNAs, PIWI-interacting RNAs, and a new class of tRNA-derived small RNAs. We discuss their biological functions in human cancer and highlight their clinical application as molecular biomarkers or therapeutic targets.

The production and secretion of tRNA-derived RNA fragments in the corn smut fungus Ustilago maydis.

The biogenesis of small non-coding RNAs is a molecular event that contributes to cellular functions. The basidiomycete fungus Ustilago maydis is a biotrophic pathogen parasitizing maize. A hallmark of its genome structure is an absence of RNAi machinery including Dicer and Argonaute proteins, which are responsible for the production of small RNAs in other organisms. However, it remains unclear whether U. maydis produces small RNAs during fungal growth. Here we found that U. maydis cells accumulate approximately 20-30 nucleotides of small RNA fragments during growth in the axenic culture condition. The RNA-seq analysis of these fragments identified that these small RNAs are originated from tRNAs and 5.8S ribosomal RNA. Interestingly, majority of their sequences are generated from tRNAs responsible for asparagine, glutamine and glycine, suggesting a bias of origin. The cleavage of tRNAs mainly occurs at the position near anticodon-stem-loop. We generated the deletion mutants of two genes nuc1 and nuc2 encoding RNase T2, which is a candidate enzyme that cleaves tRNAs. The deletion mutants of two genes largely fail to accumulate tRNA-derived RNA fragments. Nuc1 and tRNA are co-localized at the tip of budding cells and tRNA fragment could be detected in culture supernatant. Our results suggest that specific tRNAs would be cleaved during secretory processes and tRNA fragments might have extracellular functions.

Integrative Analysis of the DICER-like (DCL) Genes From Peach (Prunus persica): A Critical Role in Response to Drought Stress

DICER-likes (DCLs) proteins are the core component for non-coding RNA (ncRNA) biogenesis, playing essential roles in some biological processes. The DCL family has been characterized in model plants, such as Arabidopsis, rice, and poplar. However, the evolutionary aspect and the expression mechanism under drought stress were scarce and have never been reported and characterized in one of the most important worldwide cultivated fruit trees, peach (Prunus persica). Eight DCLs genes in the Prunus persica genome were detected, in addition to 51 DCLs in the other seven Rosaceae genomes. The phylogenetic analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana and RTL1 gene as outgroups suggested that DCL members are divided into four clades: DCL1, DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4 with several gene gain/loss events of DCL gene copies through the evolutionary tract of the Rosacea family. The number of homologous DCL copies within each clade, along with the chromosomal location indicated gene duplication event of the DCL2 gene occurred once for the subfamily Amygdaloideae and twice for Pyrus communis and Prunus dulics and trice for the P. persica on Chromosome number 7 genes. Another duplication event was found for the DCL3 gene that occurred once for all the eight Rosaceae species with no match in A. thaliana. The DCL genetic similarity and activity was evaluated using BLASTp and previously published RNA-seq data among different tissues and over different time points of peach trees exposed to drought conditions. Finally, the expression pattern of PrupeDCLs in response to drought stress was identified, and two of these members, Prupe.7G047900 and Prupe.6G363600, were found as main candidate genes for response to drought stress. Our data presented here provide useful information for a better understanding of the molecular evolution of DCL genes in Rosaceae genomes, and the function of DCLs in P. persica.

Mito-nuclear coevolution and phylogenetic artifacts: the case of bivalve mollusks

Mito-nuclear phylogenetic discordance in Bivalvia is well known. In particular, the monophyly of Amarsipobranchia (Heterodonta + Pteriomorphia), retrieved from mitochondrial markers, contrasts with the monophyly of Heteroconchia (Heterodonta + Palaeoheterodonta), retrieved from nuclear markers. However, since oxidative phosphorylation nuclear markers support the Amarsipobranchia hypothesis instead of the Heteroconchia one, interacting subunits of the mitochondrial complexes ought to share the same phylogenetic signal notwithstanding the genomic source, which is different from the signal obtained from other nuclear markers. This may be a clue of coevolution between nuclear and mitochondrial genes. In this work we inferred the phylogenetic signal from mitochondrial and nuclear oxidative phosphorylation markers exploiting different phylogenetic approaches and added two more datasets for comparison: genes of the glycolytic pathway and genes related to the biogenesis of regulative small noncoding RNAs. All trees inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear subunits of the mitochondrial complexes support the monophyly of Amarsipobranchia, regardless of the phylogenetic pipeline. However, not every single marker agrees with this topology: this is clearly visible in nuclear subunits that do not directly interact with the mitochondrial counterparts. Overall, our data support the hypothesis of a coevolution between nuclear and mitochondrial genes for the oxidative phosphorylation. Moreover, we suggest a relationship between mitochondrial topology and different nucleotide composition between clades, which could be associated to the highly variable gene arrangement in Bivalvia.

Role of Epigenetics in Modulating Phenotypic Plasticity against Abiotic Stresses in Plants

Plants being sessile are always exposed to various environmental stresses, and to overcome these stresses, modifications at the epigenetic level can prove vital for their long-term survival. Epigenomics refers to the large-scale study of epigenetic marks on the genome, which include covalent modifications of histone tails (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and the small RNA machinery). Studies based on epigenetics have evolved over the years especially in understanding the mechanisms at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels in plants against various environmental stimuli. Epigenomic changes in plants through induced methylation of specific genes that lead to changes in their expression can help to overcome various stress conditions. Recent studies suggested that epigenomics has a significant potential for crop improvement in plants. By the induction and modulation of various cellular processes like DNA methylation, histone modification, and biogenesis of noncoding RNAs, the plant genome can be activated which can help in achieving a quicker response against various plant stresses. Epigenetic modifications in plants allow them to adjust under varied environmental stresses by modulating their phenotypic plasticity and at the same time ensure the quality and yield of crops. The plasticity of the epigenome helps to adapt the plants during pre- and postdevelopmental processes. The variation in DNA methylation in different organisms exhibits variable phenotypic responses. The epigenetic changes also occur sequentially in the genome. Various studies indicated that environmentally stimulated epimutations produce variable responses especially in differentially methylated regions (DMR) that play a major role in the management of stress conditions in plants. Besides, it has been observed that environmental stresses cause specific changes in the epigenome that are closely associated with phenotypic modifications. However, the relationship between epigenetic modifications and phenotypic plasticity is still debatable. In this review, we will be discussing the role of various factors that allow epigenetic changes to modulate phenotypic plasticity against various abiotic stress in plants.

Biogenesis, Functions, Interactions, and Resources of Non-Coding RNAs in Plants.

Plant transcriptomes encompass a large number of functional non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), only some of which have protein-coding capacity. Since their initial discovery, ncRNAs have been classified into two broad categories based on their biogenesis and mechanisms of action, housekeeping ncRNAs and regulatory ncRNAs. With advances in RNA sequencing technology and computational methods, bioinformatics resources continue to emerge and update rapidly, including workflow for in silico ncRNA analysis, up-to-date platforms, databases, and tools dedicated to ncRNA identification and functional annotation. In this review, we aim to describe the biogenesis, biological functions, and interactions with DNA, RNA, protein, and microorganism of five major regulatory ncRNAs (miRNA, siRNA, tsRNA, circRNA, lncRNA) in plants. Then, we systematically summarize tools for analysis and prediction of plant ncRNAs, as well as databases. Furthermore, we discuss the silico analysis process of these ncRNAs and present a protocol for step-by-step computational analysis of ncRNAs. In general, this review will help researchers better understand the world of ncRNAs at multiple levels.

The RNA polymerase II subunit NRPB2 is required for indeterminate root development, cell viability, stem cell niche maintenance, and de novo root tip regeneration in Arabidopsis.

The RNA polymerase II drives the biogenesis of coding and non-coding RNAs for gene expression. Here, we describe new roles for its second-largest subunit, NRPB2, on root organogenesis and regeneration. Down-regulation of NRPB2 activates a determinate developmental program, which correlated with a reduction in mitotic activity, cell elongation, and size of the root apical meristem. Noteworthy, nrpb2-3 mutants manifest cell death in pro-vascular cells within primary root tips of plants grown in darkness or exposed to light, which triggers the expression of the regeneration gene marker ERF115 in neighbor cells close to damage. Auxin and stem cell niche (SCN) gene expression as well as structural analysis revealed that NRPB2 maintains SCN activity through distribution of PIN transporters in root tissues. Wild-type seedlings regenerated the root tip after excision of the QC and SCN, but nrpb2-3 mutants did not rebuild the missing tissues, and this process could be genotypified using pERF115:GFP, DR5:GFP, and pWOX5:GFP reporter constructs. The levels of reactive oxygen species increased in the mutants four days after germination and strongly decreased at later times, whereas nitric oxide accumulated as the root tip differentiates. These results show the importance of the transcriptional machinery for root organogenesis, cell viability, and regenerative capacity for reconstruction of tissues and organs upon injury.

CELF Family Proteins in Cancer: Highlights on the RNA-Binding Protein/Noncoding RNA Regulatory Axis.

Post-transcriptional modifications to coding and non-coding RNAs are unquestionably a pivotal way in which human mRNA and protein diversity can influence the different phases of a transcript’s life cycle. CELF (CUGBP Elav-like family) proteins are RBPs (RNA-binding proteins) with pleiotropic capabilities in RNA processing. Their responsibilities extend from alternative splicing and transcript editing in the nucleus to mRNA stability, and translation into the cytoplasm. In this way, CELF family members have been connected to global alterations in cancer proliferation and invasion, leading to their identification as potential tumor suppressors or even oncogenes. Notably, genetic variants, alternative splicing, phosphorylation, acetylation, subcellular distribution, competition with other RBPs, and ultimately lncRNAs, miRNAs, and circRNAs all impact CELF regulation. Discoveries have emerged about the control of CELF functions, particularly via noncoding RNAs, and CELF proteins have been identified as competing, antagonizing, and regulating agents of noncoding RNA biogenesis. On the other hand, CELFs are an intriguing example through which to broaden our understanding of the RBP/noncoding RNA regulatory axis. Balancing these complex pathways in cancer is undeniably pivotal and deserves further research. This review outlines some mechanisms of CELF protein regulation and their functional consequences in cancer physiology.

ALKBH5 Exacerbates Aortic Dissection by Promoting Inflammatory Response and Apoptosis of Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells via Regulating lnc‐TMPO‐AS1/EZH2/IRAK4 Signals in an m6A Modification Manner

Recently, mounting evidence indicates that N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) modification functions as a pivotal posttranscriptional modification that regulates noncoding RNA biogenesis to influence the progression of multiple diseases. However, whether m6A modification is involved in aortic dissection (AD) development has never been reported. Meanwhile, numerous studies have shown that AngII‐induced inflammatory damage and excessive apoptosis of human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) are the crucial pathological features of AD development. Therefore, in this study, we intended to explore whether m6A modification can regulate AD progression by influencing the damage effects of AngII on HASMCs and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Firstly, we screened and confirmed the high expression of alkylation repair homolog protein 5 (ALKBH5), a key m6A demethylase, in aortic tissues from AD patients, indicating that m6A modification may indeed be involved in AD progression. Subsequently, we demonstrated that ALKBH5 can exacerbate the AngII‐induced HASMC inflammatory injury as well as apoptosis and shorten the survival time of AngII‐infused mice. Mechanistically, we revealed that lncRNA TMPO‐AS1 is a downstream target for ALKBH5 to affect AD progression in vitro and vivo. Meanwhile, we confirmed that ALKBH5‐mediated m6A demethylation downregulates lnc‐TMPO‐AS1 by decreasing the stability of its nascent. Further, we demonstrated that lnc‐TMPO‐AS1 exhibits its functions in HASMCs, at least partly, through downregulating IRAK4 at the epigenetic level by combining with EZH2. Finally, the direct positive correlation between ALKBH5 and IRAK4 in terms of the expression level and biological function was confirmed, which further enforced the preciseness and correctness of our findings. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that ALKBH5 aggravates AD by promoting inflammatory response and apoptosis of HASMCs via regulating lnc‐TMPO‐AS1/EZH2/IRAK4 signals in an m6A modification manner and may provide a novel molecular basis for subsequent researchers to searching for novel therapeutic approaches to improve the health of patients fighting AD and other cardiovascular diseases.

Alzheimer's, Parkinson's Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Gene Expression Patterns Divergence Reveals Different Grade of RNA Metabolism Involvement.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are neurodegenerative disorders characterized by a progressive degeneration of the central or peripheral nervous systems. A central role of the RNA metabolism has emerged in these diseases, concerning mRNAs processing and non-coding RNAs biogenesis. We aimed to identify possible common grounds or differences in the dysregulated pathways of AD, PD, and ALS. To do so, we performed RNA-seq analysis to investigate the deregulation of both coding and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in ALS, AD, and PD patients and controls (CTRL) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A total of 293 differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs and 87 mRNAs were found in ALS patients. In AD patients a total of 23 DE genes emerged, 19 protein coding genes and four lncRNAs. Through Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analyses, we found common affected pathways and biological processes in ALS and AD. In PD patients only five genes were found to be DE. Our data brought to light the importance of lncRNAs and mRNAs regulation in three principal neurodegenerative disorders, offering starting points for new investigations on deregulated pathogenic mechanisms.

Analysis of N6-Methyladenosine Methyltransferase Reveals METTL14 and ZC3H13 as Tumor Suppressor Genes in Breast Cancer.

ObjectivesRecently, an increasing number of studies have revealed that N6-methyladenosine (m6A) functions as a significant post-transcriptional modification which plays a critical role in the occurrence and progression of enriched tumors by regulating coding and non-coding RNA biogenesis. However, the biological function of m6A in breast cancer remains largely unclear.Materials and MethodsIn this study, we used a series of bioinformatic databases and tools to jointly analyze the expression of m6A methylation transferases (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, RBM15, RBM15B and ZC3H13) and investigate the prognostic value of METTL14 and ZC3H13 in breast cancer. Besides, we analyzed the downstream carcinogenic molecular mechanisms related to METTL14 and ZC3H13 and their relationship with immune infiltration in breast tumor tissues.ResultsThe results showed that METTL14 and ZC3H13 were the down-regulated m6A methylation transferases in breast cancer. Survival outcome analysis suggested that abnormally low expression of METTL14 and ZC3H13 could predict unfavorable prognosis in four breast cancer subtypes. Moreover, their down-regulation was associated with ER-, PR- and triple-negative breast cancer patients, as well as tumor progression (increased Scarff, Bloom and Richardson grade status and Nottingham Prognostic Index classification). Co-expression analysis revealed that METTL14 and ZC3H13 had a strong positive correlation with APC, an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway, indicating they might cooperate in regulating proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of tumor cells. METTL14, ZC3H13, and APC expression levels had significant positive correlation with infiltrating levels of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells, and negative correlation with Treg cells in breast cancer.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that down-regulation of METTL14 and ZC3H13 which act as two tumor suppressor genes was found in breast cancer and predicted poor prognosis. Their abnormal expression promoted breast cancer invasion by affecting pathways related to tumor progression and mediating immunosuppression.

TRNA Fragments Populations Analysis in Mutants Affecting tRNAs Processing and tRNA Methylation.

tRNA fragments (tRFs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) derived from tRNAs. tRFs are highly abundant in many cell types including stem cells and cancer cells, and are found in all domains of life. Beyond translation control, tRFs have several functions ranging from transposon silencing to cell proliferation control. However, the analysis of tRFs presents specific challenges and their biogenesis is not well understood. They are very heterogeneous and highly modified by numerous post-transcriptional modifications. Here we describe a bioinformatic pipeline (tRFs-Galaxy) to study tRFs populations and shed light onto tRNA fragments biogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Indeed, we used small RNAs Illumina sequencing datasets extracted from wild type and mutant ovaries affecting two different highly conserved steps of tRNA biogenesis: 5′pre-tRNA processing (RNase-P subunit Rpp30) and tRNA 2′-O-methylation (dTrm7_34 and dTrm7_32). Using our pipeline, we show how defects in tRNA biogenesis affect nuclear and mitochondrial tRFs populations and other small non-coding RNAs biogenesis, such as small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). This tRF analysis workflow will advance the current understanding of tRFs biogenesis, which is crucial to better comprehend tRFs roles and their implication in human pathology.

Diverse functions of deadenylases in DNA damage response and genomic integrity.

DNA damage response (DDR) is a coordinated network of diverse cellular processes including the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA lesions, the adjustment of metabolic network and cell fate determination. To deal with the unavoidable DNA damage caused by either endogenous or exogenous stresses, the cells need to reshape the gene expression profile to allow efficient transcription and translation of DDR-responsive messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and to repress the nonessential mRNAs. A predominant method to adjust RNA fate is achieved by modulating the 3'-end oligo(A) or poly(A) length via the opposing actions of polyadenylation and deadenylation. Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) and the carbon catabolite repressor 4 (CCR4)-Not complex, the major executors of deadenylation, are indispensable to DDR and genomic integrity in eukaryotic cells. PARN modulates cell cycle progression by regulating the stabilities of mRNAs and microRNA (miRNAs) involved in the p53 pathway and contributes to genomic stability by affecting the biogenesis of noncoding RNAs including miRNAs and telomeric RNA. The CCR4-Not complex is involved in diverse pathways of DDR including transcriptional regulation, signaling pathways, mRNA stabilities, translation regulation, and protein degradation. The RNA targets of deadenylases are tuned by the DDR signaling pathways, while in turn the deadenylases can regulate the levels of DNA damage-responsive proteins. The mutual feedback between deadenylases and the DDR signaling pathways allows the cells to precisely control DDR by dynamically adjusting the levels of sensors and effectors of the DDR signaling pathways. Here, the diverse functions of deadenylases in DDR are summarized and the underlying mechanisms are proposed according to recent findings. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > 3' End Processing RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms.