Molecular docking, pivotal in predicting small-molecule ligand binding modes, struggles with accurately identifying binding conformations and affinities. This is particularly true for neonicotinoids, insecticides whose impacts on ecosystems require precise molecular interaction modeling. This study scrutinizes the effectiveness of prominent docking software (Ledock, ADFR, Autodock Vina, CDOCKER) in simulating interactions of environmental chemicals, especially neonicotinoid-like molecules with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and acetylcholine binding proteins (AChBPs). We aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of these tools in reproducing crystallographic data, focusing on semi-flexible and flexible docking approaches. Our analysis identified Ledock as the most accurate in semi-flexible docking, while Autodock Vina with Vinardo scoring function proved most reliable. However, no software consistently excelled in both accuracy and reliability. Additionally, our evaluation revealed that none of the tools could establish a clear correlation between docking scores and experimental dissociation constants (Kd) for neonicotinoid-like compounds. In contrast, a strong correlation was found with drug-like compounds, bringing to light a bias in considered software towards pharmaceuticals, thus limiting their applicability to environmental chemicals. The comparison between semi-flexible and flexible docking revealed that the increased computational complexity of the latter did not result in enhanced accuracy. In fact, the higher computational cost of flexible docking with its lack of enhanced predictive accuracy, rendered this approach useless for this class of compounds. Conclusively, our findings emphasize the need for continued development of docking methodologies, particularly for environmental chemicals. This study not only illuminates current software capabilities but also underscores the urgency for advancements in computational molecular docking as it is a relevant tool to environmental sciences.