Background: Dyslipidemia is increasingly prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region, correlating with higher mortality rates for ASCVD among this population. Statins, the cornerstone for dyslipidemia management, face higher intolerance in Asians compared to other races. PCSK9 inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic additive to other lipid-lowering therapies. However, current trials predominantly involve caucasian populations, emphasizing the need for efficacy data across other ethnic groups. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the efficacy and safety profile of PCSK9i in Asian populations at high risk for ASCVD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane for RCTs from the past 10 years on PCSK9i vs. placebo in Asian populations at risk for ASCVD. Efficacy was measured by the mean difference in LDL levels from baseline. Safety parameters included ALT/AST, CK levels, and binding antibodies. Analysis was done with Review Manager, assessing heterogeneity with I^2 statistics. Results: Eleven studies in Singapore, Japan, the Philippines, India, South Korea, China, and Taiwan included 5443 patients (73% male, mean age 60.6, mean baseline LDL 114 mg/dL) with follow-up from 12 weeks to 16 months. Inclisiran was used in 3 studies, evolocumab in 5, alirocumab in 2, and tafolecimab in 1, alongside statins or ezetimibe. PCSK9i reduced LDL by -74.21 mg/dL and increased the likelihood of >50% LDL reduction compared to placebo (RR: 37.41, 95% CI: 16.31-85.82, P < 0.00001; I^2: 0%). PCSK9i significantly improve the achievement of LDL levels <70 mg/dL compared to placebo (RR: 15.77; 95% CI: 7.12 - 34.91, P < 0.00001; I^2: 82%) Adverse events showed a non-significant risk of >3x ULN increase in ALT/AST ( RR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.33-1.05; P = 0.78, I^2: 0%) and >5x ULN increase in creatine kinase (RR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.07-1.49; P = 0.97; I^2 = 0%). No significant difference in binding antibodies was observed (RR: 2.50, 95% CI: 0.13-49.47, P = 0.55; I^2 = 65%) Conclusion: In Asian populations, PCSK9 inhibitors effectively lower LDL levels without significant adverse events. The considerable heterogeneity in LDL reduction may result from variations in dosing, different agents used, baseline LDL levels, and geographical diversity. Future research should explore effects across more ethnicities to enhance generalizability.
Read full abstract