e16192 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a malignancy of the biliary tract epithelium, is of increasing importance due to its rising incidence worldwide. However, it also remains one of the most lethal malignances with a survival rate ranging between 6-16 months. Despite poor outcomes, palliative care remains underutilized in CCA. Determining outcomes, and differences in various CCA types remains crucial in helping patients and clinicians make goal of care decisions with regards to aggressive treatment. Objectives:The objective of this study is to compare survival outcomes between intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). In addition, it aims to compare the utilization palliative care in either subtype, considering the high morbidity and mortality of the disease. Methods: Pooled cross-sectional observational study of the2004-2017 National Cancer Database (NCDB), which contains almost 400,000 records. The study population included de-identified records of patients with CCA; ages 18-90. Descriptive statistics (frequency, means, and standard deviations) were used. For survival analyses, the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and a multivariate Cox regression model was used. Results: A total of 53,054 patients with CCA were identified. Of which, 63.4% had iCCA and 36.7% of patients had eCCA. There were statistically significant differences between the two cohorts in regard to sex, race/ethnicity, as well as in Charlson Co-Morbidity score. 65.2% of iCCA patients had advanced clinical stages III/IV as compared to 62.5% of eCCA patients. Higher percentage of iCCA patients had bone metastasis (7.8% vs 4.6 %, p < 0.001), pulmonary metastasis (11.5% vs 7.8%; p <0.001) and tumor size greater than 5 cm (62.1% vs 20.7%, p <0.001) compared to eCCA. Regarding treatment, patients with iCCA were more likely to receive multi-agent chemotherapy (35.0% vs 26.2 %, p<0.001). Although statistically significant differences for primary site surgical intervention (25.5% vs 25.0%, p<0.001), as well as for immunotherapy (6% vs 5.4%, p= 0.048), was found, they were not clinically significant. Patients with eCCA had a higher 90-day mortality (11.4% vs 8.2%, p <0.001), with 21% less likelihood of survival compared to iCCA patients (AOR:0.79, CI:0.74-0.84). Palliative care remained underutilized, with a lower utilization in iCCA (15.7% vs 12.5%, p <0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that iCCA patients have better survival outcomes compared to eCCA patients. This could be due to biological/genomic differences which warrant future investigation. Future clinical trials could also stratify for the location of CCA. Despite CCA’s poor prognosis, palliative care remained underutilized, with lower utilization rates in iCCA compared to eCCA.
Read full abstract