Biliary Drainage Research Articles

Survival analysis of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background/purposeThis study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic versus open resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) and analyzed potential prognostic factors.MethodsThe study included patients who underwent HCCA resection at our center from March 2012 to February 2022. Perioperative complications and postoperative prognosis were compared between the laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) groups.ResultsAfter screening 313 HCCA patients, 68 patients were eligible for the study in the LS group (n = 40) and OS group (n = 28). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis revealed that overall survival > 2 years and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) were more common in the LS than OS group, but the rate of 2-year DFS was lower in the LS group than OS group. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed age (< 65 years), radical resection, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were associated with reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.380, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.150–0.940, P = 0.036; HR = 0.080, 95% CI = 0.010–0.710, P = 0.024 and HR = 0.380, 95% CI = 0.150–0.960, P = 0.040), whereas preoperative biliary drainage was an independent factor associated with increased risk of death (HR = 2.810, 95% CI = 1.130–6.950, P = 0.026). Perineuronal invasion was identified as an independent risk factor affecting DFS (HR = 5.180, 95% CI = 1.170–22.960, P = 0.030).ConclusionsCompared with OS, laparoscopic HCCA resection does not significantly differ in terms of clinical efficacy. Age (<65 years), radical resection, and postoperative adjuvant therapy reduce the risk of death, and preoperative biliary drainage increases the risk of death.

Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels in Portuguese Interventional Radiology departments

PurposeTo establish Portuguese Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), for six body fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures (FGIP). MethodA retrospective study was conducted in five interventional departments most representative of Interventional Radiology (IR) practice. Dose values, in terms of air kerma area product (PKA in Gy.cm2), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r in mGy), and exposure parameters (fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of cine runs) were collected. Examinations were selected per procedure (at least 20), according to the antero-posterior and lateral diameter mean value (±5 cm), measured on previous Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. ResultsData of 489 body FGIP show a large variation on dose values per procedure and per department. National DRLs in terms of PKA were 20.2 Gy.cm2 for Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), 98.2 Gy.cm2 for Bronchial artery embolisation (BAE), 247.7 Gy.cm2 for Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), 331.6 Gy.cm2 for Inferior epigastric arteries embolisation (IEAE), 312.0 Gy.cm2 for Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and 19.3 Gy.cm2 for Endovascular treatment of femoral popliteal arteries (ETFPA). ConclusionsThis is the first study reporting Interventional Radiology DRLs in Portugal and we propose preliminary national estimates for the six more common body FGIP. The results of this study will be presented and discussed with all Portuguese IR departments, to promote procedures optimisation.

The association between KRAS and histopathological growth patterns and the impact on resection margins around vasculature and bile ducts in colorectal liver metastases.

The liver is the most frequent and often the only site of distant disease in colorectal cancer and, of all treatment protocols currently in use, resection is the most likely to result in long-term cure. Within the liver, tumour proximity to major vasculature and biliary structures poses a resection challenge, requiring a balance of achieving negative margins while preserving adequate vascular circulation and biliary drainage. The focus on parenchymal sparing resections are important but just as important may be the 'biological' behaviour of the tumour. In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), biomarkers such as the Kirsten rat sarcoma oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene and histological growth patterns (HGPs) further improve the prognostication after resection. However, to date, the association between the KRAS status and HGPs in CRLM and their impact on resection margins around major vasculature or biliary structures in terms of overall survival and recurrence rates are unclear. The aim of this review was to explore the available evidence for the association between KRAS and HGPs in CRLM and attempt to define their impact on resection margins near major structures.

Triple biliary drainage: adding a third direction

Triple biliary drainage: adding a third direction

Ultrasound-Guided Interventions in the Biliary System.

Ultrasound guidance in biliary interventions has become the standard tool to facilitate percutaneous biliary drainage as well as percutaneous gall bladder drainage. Monitoring of the needle tip whilst penetrating the tissue in real time using ultrasound allows precise manoeuvres and exact targeting without radiation exposure. Without the need for fluoroscopy, ultrasound-guided drainage procedures can be performed bedside as a sometimes life-saving procedure in patients with severe cholangitis/cholecystitis when they are critically ill in intensive care units and cannot be transported to a fluoroscopy suite. This article describes the current data background and guidelines and focuses on specific sonographic aspects of both the procedures of percutaneous biliary drainage and gallbladder drainage.

A Novel Method of Calculating the Drained Liver Volume Using a 3D Volume Analyzer for Biliary Drainage of Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

ObjectivesIn patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO), drainage of ≥ 50% liver volume correlates with better clinical outcomes. Accurately measuring the liver volume to be drained by biliary stents is required. We aimed to develop a novel method for calculating the drained liver volume (DLV) using a 3D volume analyzer (3D volumetry), and assess the usefulness for drainage in patients with UMHBO.MethodsThree-dimensional volumetry comprises the following steps: (1) manual tracing of bile duct using 3D imaging system; (2) 3D reconstruction of bile duct and liver parenchyma; and (3) calculating DLV according to the 3D distribution of bile ducts. Using 3D volumetry, we reviewed data of patients who underwent biliary drainage for UMHBO, calculated the DLV, and determined the association between DLV and biliary drainage outcome.ResultsThere were 104 eligible cases. The mean DLV was 708 ± 393 ml (53% ± 21%). and 65 patients (63%) underwent drainage of ≥50% liver volume. The clinical success rate was significantly higher in patients with DLV ≥ 50% than in patients with DLV < 50% (89% vs. 28%, P < 0.001). The median time to recurrence of biliary obstruction (TRBO) and survival time were significantly longer in patients with DLV ≥ 50% than in patients with DLV < 50% (TRBO, 292 vs. 119 days, P = 0.03; survival, 285 vs. 65days, P = 0.004, log-rank test, respectively).ConclusionsThree-dimensional volumetry, a novel method to calculate DLV accurately according to bile duct distribution was useful for drainage in UMHBO patients.

Trends of Endoscopic Palliation for Advanced Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO), an aggressive type of perihilar biliary obstruction caused by cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or other metastatic malignancies, has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for biliary malignancies. However, most patients with MHO cannot undergo surgery upon presentation because of their advanced inoperable state or poor performance resulting from old age or comorbid diseases. Therefore, palliative biliary drainage is required to improve symptomatic jaundice and quality of life. Preoperative biliary drainage is controversial in resectable cases of MHO. Preoperative biliary drainage should be considered according to specific selection criteria. Palliative drainage is currently the mainstay of symptomatic treatment. Compared with percutaneous access, primary endoscopic palliation using plastic or metal stents has recently shown higher technical feasibility and clinical success without increasing the frequency of adverse events, even in high-degree MHO. However, the use of stents still has numerous limitations, including challenges in determining the optimal type of stent, number of stents, deployment method, and additional local therapies. Therefore, this report presents the current optimal endoscopic drainage status for MHO based on recent guidelines and published literature.

Accessibility to ERCP-performing hospitals among patients with pancreatic cancer living in SEER regions.

The two most common interventions used to treat painless jaundice from pancreatic cancer are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Our study aimed to characterize the geographic distribution of ERCP-performing hospitals among patients with pancreatic cancer in the United States and the association between geographic accessibility to ERCP-performing hospitals and biliary interventions patients receive. This is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database for pancreatic cancer from 2005 to 2013. Multilevel models were used to examine the association between accessibility to ERCP hospitals within a 30- and 45-min drive from the patient's residential ZIP Code and the receipt of ERCP treatment. A two-step floating catchment area model was used to calculate the measure of accessibility based on the distribution across SEER regions. 7464 and 782 patients underwent ERCP and PTBD, respectively, over the study period. There were 808 hospitals in which 8246 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in SEER regions from 2005 to 2013 received a procedure. Patients with high accessibility within both 30- and 45-min drive to an ERCP-performing hospital were more likely to receive an ERCP (30-min adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.01; 45-min aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70). Furthermore, in the adjusted model, Black patients (vs. White) and patients with stage IV disease were less likely to receive ERCP than PTBD. Patients with pancreatic cancer and high accessibility to an ERCP-performing hospital were more likely to receive ERCP. Disparities in the receipt of ERCP persisted for Black patients regardless of their access to ERCP-performing hospitals.

Factors affecting survival in patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction.

The general approach to malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is to provide drainage in all patients with jaundice. However, the procedure is often palliative, and its contribution to survival is debated. This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors in patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for MBO. All laboratory values were divided into two groups based on median values: low and high. Chi-square analysis was performed for dichotomous data. The time from the PTBD procedure to the date of death or last follow-up was considered overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were calculated using the Cox regression model. A total of 152 patients were included in the study, of whom 84 (55.3%) were male. The median OS was 71 ± 12.6 days (95% CI: 46.3-95.7). The 1, 3, 6, and 12-month OS rates were 74.3%, 45.2%, 29.2%, and 13%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, comorbidity (p=0.029), Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) (p=0.007), pre-PTBD albumin (p=0.025), post-PTBD aspartate aminotransferase (p=0.025), chemo naive (p<0.001), and post-PTBD chemotherapy (CT) (p=0.01) were found to be independent prognostic factors. In patients with poor prognosis MBO, the decision for PTBD should be made multidisciplinarily, taking into consideration ECOG PS, comorbidities, albumin levels, and prior CT status.

Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary obstruction

Background: Obstructive jaundice is a common clinical condition that causes many complications, especially septic shock. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) plays an important role in determining the cause, extent, and complications of biliary obstruction. Purposes: To investigate the value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary obstruction. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from January 2019 to November 2022. Forty-four patients with biliary obstruction who underwent MRCP, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC, a step in the procedure of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage) were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The mean age was 62.75 ± 13.29 years. Male/female ratio was 1.3/1. The most common cause of obstruction was biliary malignancy (56,9%). Bilateral intrahepatic duct dilation (54.5%) and hilar obstruction (65.9%) were predominant. On MRCP, abrupt cut-off of the duct, irregular margin, and asymmetric biliary stricture. There was a good to very good concordance between MRCP and PTC in determining the site of dilatation, site of obstruction, and characteristics of biliary obstruction. Compared with PTC, MRCP had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89.5% in the evaluation of abrupt cut-off; a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 100% in detecting biliary stricture. Conclusion: MRCP is useful in a comprehensive evaluation of the biliary tract including anatomy and variations as well as site, degree, extent, etiologies, and complications of obstruction. MRCP should be included in the routine workup of patients with biliary obstruction who might be candidates for percutaneous biliary intervention. Key words: Biliary obstruction, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

Association of short-course antimicrobial therapy and bacterial resistance in acute cholangitis: Retrospective cohort study.

Background and study aims Although the number of resistant bacteria tends to increase with prolonged antimicrobial therapy, no studies have examined the relationship between the duration of antimicrobial therapy and increase in the number of resistant bacteria in acute cholangitis. We hypothesized that the short-term administration of antimicrobial agents in acute cholangitis would suppress bacterial resistance. Patients and methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients with acute cholangitis admitted between January 2018 and June 2020 who met the following criteria: successful biliary drainage, positive blood or bile cultures, bacteria identified from cultures sensitive to antimicrobials, and subsequent cholangitis recurrence by January 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose causative organisms at the time of recurrence became resistant to the antimicrobial agents used at the time of initial admission (resistant group) and those who remained susceptible (susceptible group). Multivariate analysis was used to examine risk factors associated with the development of resistant pathogens. Multivariate analysis investigated antibiotics used with the length of 3 days or shorter after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and previously reported risk factors for the development of bacterial resistance. Results In total, 89 eligible patients were included in this study. There were no significant differences in patient background or ERCP findings between the groups. The use of antibiotics, completed within 3 days after ERCP, was associated with a lower risk of developing bacterial resistance (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.65; P =0.01). Conclusions In acute cholangitis, the administration of antimicrobials within 3 days of ERCP may suppress the development of resistant bacteria.

Same-session endoscopic diagnosis and symptom palliation in pancreato-biliary malignancies: Clinical impact of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).

Background and study aims Besides increasing adequacy, rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may impact choices and timing of subsequent therapeutic procedures, yet has been unexplored. Patients and methods This was a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively maintained database of a tertiary, academic centre with availability of ROSE and hybrid EUS-ERCP suites. All consecutive patients referred for pathological confirmation of suspected malignancy and jaundice or gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) between Jan-2020 and Sep-2022 were included. Results Of 541 patients with underlying malignancy, 323 (59.7%) required same-session pathological diagnosis (male: 54.8%; age 70 [interquartile range 63-78]; pancreatic cancer: 76.8%, biliary tract adenocarcinoma 16.1%). ROSE adequacy was 96.6%, higher for EUS versus ERCP. Among 302 patients with jaundice, ERCP-guided stenting was successful in 83.1%, but final drainage was completed in 97.4% thanks to 43 EUS-guided biliary drainage procedures. Twenty-one patients with GOO were treated with 15 EUS-gastroenterostomies and six duodenal stents. All 58 therapeutic EUS procedures occurred after adequate ROSE. With ERCP-guided placement of stents, the use of plastic stents was significantly higher among patients with inadequate ROSE (10/11; 90.9%) versus adequate sampling (14/240; 5.8%) P <0.0001; OR 161; 95%CI 19-1352). Median hospital stay for diagnosis and palliation was 3 days (range, 2-7) and median time to chemotherapy was 33 days (range, 24-47). Conclusions Nearly two-thirds of oncological candidates for endoscopic palliation require contemporary pathological diagnosis. ROSE adequacy allows, since the index procedure, state-of-the-art therapeutics standardly restricted to pathologically confirmed malignancies (e.g. uncovered SEMS or therapeutic EUS), potentially reducing hospitalization and time to oncological treatments.

Portal vein stenting in recurrent or locally advanced peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundRecurrent or locally advanced peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) usually involves the portal vein (PV) leading to significant stenosis. With disease progression, clinical symptoms such as ascites, bleeding, and hepatic insufficiency are usually observed. Little is know about the benefit of PV stenting in relieving the symptoms associated to portal hypertension and allowing anticancer therapies. The aim of this study is to review our experience in PV stenting for PHCC patients. MethodsFrom 2014 to 2022, data from PHCC patients underwent PV stenting at Verona University Hospital, Italy, were reviewed. The indications were: gastrointestinal bleeding from esophagus-gastric varices, ascites not responsive to medical therapy, severe thrombocytopenia, liver insufficiency (hepatic jaundice, coagulopathy, and/or hyperammoniemia), or asymptomatic high-grade PV stenosis. Cavernous transformation and intrahepatic thrombosis in both sides of the liver were considered contraindication. Systematic anticoagulation therapy was not administered. ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all 16 (100 %) patients. The improvement of clinical symptoms were observed in 12 (75 %) patients. Anticancer therapy was administrated in 11 (69 %) patients. 2 (13 %) complications were observed: 1 biliary injury and 1 recurrent cholangitis that required a percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage placement. Stent occlusion for tumor progression occurred in 1 patient and a re-stenting procedure was successfully performed. No case of thrombotic stent occlusion was observed during follow up. The 1-year stent patency was 86 % and the median patency period was 8 months (IQR, 4–12). ConclusionPV stenting is a feasible and safe palliative treatment that improves clinical condition, allow anticancer therapies, and provide a better quality of life.

Will Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Choledocoduodenostomy with Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement Replace Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography When Treating Distal Malignant Biliary Obstructions?

Malignant distal biliary obstructions are becoming increasingly common, especially in patients with cancers of the pancreatic head, despite progress in medical oncology research. ERCP is the current gold standard for management of such strictures, but the emergence of EC-LAMS has rendered EUS-CDS both safe and efficient. It is a "game changer"; originally intended for ERCP failure, two randomised clinical trials recently proposed EUS-CDS as a first-intent procedure in palliative settings. For resectable diseases, the absence of iatrogenic pancreatitis associated with a lower rate of postsurgical adverse events (compared with ERCP) leads us to believe that EUS-CDS might be used in first-intent as a pre-operative endoscopic biliary drainage.

Impact of sarcopenia on recurrent biliary obstruction after EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Sarcopenia is an important prognostic factor for cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of sarcopenia to predict recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) in patients with unresectable cancer after EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). The study enrolled 113 patients who underwent EUS-BD using the self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) between April 2016 and December 2021 at Wakayama Medical University Hospital. The skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar spine level (L3) was calculated from computed tomography images. We analyzed the cumulative incidence of RBO at 180days after stent insertion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables significantly associated with RBO. Seventy-six patients were assigned to the sarcopenia group, and 37 were assigned to the non-sarcopenia group. The 180-day cumulative incidence of RBO was 11% in the non-sarcopenia group and 29% in the sarcopenia group (p = 0.034). The time to RBO was significantly shorter for the sarcopenia group (p = 0.028; Gray's test). Multivariate analyses identified sarcopenia as an independent prognostic factor for RBO (present vs absent; HR 4.61; 95% CI 1.76-12.10, p = 0.001). The rates of biliary sludge/food impaction were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group for the causes of RBO (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences between the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups with respect to related EUS-BD adverse events. Sarcopenia is an independent indicator of RBO in patients with MBO who receive EUS-BD with SEMS.

Outcomes of Self-expandable Metal Stents in Patients With Unresectable Gallbladder Cancer Undergoing Percutaneous Biliary Drainage

BackgroundBiliary obstruction in gallbladder cancer (GBC) is associated with worse prognosis and needs drainage. In patients with biliary confluence involvement, percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) is preferred over endoscopic drainage. However, PBD catheters are associated with higher complications compared to endoscopic drainage. PBD with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) is desirable for palliation. However, the data in patients with unresectable GBC is lacking. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with proven GBC who underwent PBD-SEMS insertion between January 2021 and December 2022. Technical success, post-procedural complications, clinical success, duration of stent patency, and biliary reinterventions were recorded. Clinical follow-up data was analysed at 30 days and 180 days of SEMS insertion and mortality was recorded. ResultsOf the 416 patients with unresectable GBC, who underwent PBD, 28 (median age, 50 years; 16 females) with PBD-SEMS insertion were included. All SEMS placement procedures were technically successful. There were no immediate/ early post-procedural complications/ deaths. The procedures were clinically successful in 63.6% of the patients with hyperbilirubinemia (n=11). Biliary re-interventions were done in 6 (21.4%). The survival rate was 89.3 % (25/28) at 30 days and 50% at 180 days. The median follow-up duration was 80 days (range, 8-438 days). ConclusionPBD-SEMS has moderate clinical success and 6-months patency in almost half of the patients with metastatic GBC and must be considered for palliation.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-obtained bile culture in acute cholangitis: retrospective analysis of bile cultures and risk factors in a tertiary care center.

Collection of bile aspirate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is essential to identify pathogens responsible for acute cholangitis. Limited data are available on the risk factors for the presence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in bile. We conducted this retrospective, single-center study to assess the prevalence and susceptibility rates of bacteria in bile cultures, and the risk factors for the presence of pathogens, MDRO, and fungi in bile. All consecutive patients who underwent biliary drainage for acute cholangitis from January 2017 to December 2019 were included. 443/1610 ERCPs were performed for acute cholangitis. Bile culture was collected in 91.4% (405/443), of which 86.7% were positive. Most common isolates were Enterococcus faecalis (37.6%) and Escherichia coli (32.8%). Vancomycin resistance was found in 9.9% of Enterococcus species (spp.); extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases in 11.2% and 0.9% of Enterobacteriaceae, respectively. The empiric antimicrobial therapy was changed in 26.4% (n=107) of cases, with a clinical response in 90.7%. In multivariate analysis, biliary stenting was an independent risk factor for positive bile culture (odds ratio [OR] 9.43; P<0.01). Independent risk factors for MDRO in bile were patient age>60years (OR 2.51; P=0.03), previous sphincterotomy (OR 2.57; P=0.02), and biliary stenting (OR 2.80; P<0.01). Previous sphincterotomy was the only risk factor for isolation of fungi in bile (OR 1.61; P=0.04). Our study showed an increasing prevalence of Enterococcus spp. and MDRO. Bile cultures should be routinely collected in cholangitis and in patients with repeated ERCPs to allow more efficient antimicrobial treatment.

Safety and feasibility of preoperative simultaneous portal vein embolization and biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma prior to hepatectomy

Purpose: Evaluate safety and feasibility of simultaneous biliary drainage (BD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) prior to hepatectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients. Methods: From January 2010 to June 2022, patients with potentially surgically resectable HCCA who underwent preoperative PVE and BD were analyzed. Type of initial BD, time interval between BD and PVE, changes in future liver remnant (FLR), time interval between BD, PVE and resection, and complications were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the BD-PVE interval: Group A: simultaneous BD and PVE or within 7 days (d), n = 6; Group B: d ≥ 7 to ≤ 30, n = 7; Group C: d &gt; 30, n = 14). Primary endpoints were post-PVE complications, FLR change, and resection rate. Secondary endpoints were Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, Grade B/C Post Hepatectomy Liver Failure (PHLF) and 90 days mortality rate. Results: A total of 27 patients (mean age = 64.4 +/- 11.2 years) underwent both BD and PVE prior to hepatectomy. Mean degree of hypertrophy at 4-6 weeks post-PVE was 10.4 +/- 3.7% with no significant difference between the 3 groups (p &gt; 0.05). Resection was 67% in Group A, and 57% and 36% in groups B and C respectively (p &lt; 0.05). Time to surgery was 38.5 +/- 12 days in Group A, and 60 and 147 days in groups B and C respectively (p = 0.002). No major post PVE SIR complication was reported in group A. Overall rate of Grade III/IV Clavien-Dindo complication was 61.5% with no difference among the three groups (50%, 75%, and 60%; groups A, B and C, respectively). Overall PHLF Grade B/C was reported in 46.2% of patients. No patients in Group A demonstrated Grade B/C PHLF. Conclusion: Simultaneous BD and PVE is safe and reduces the time to surgery, which may help contribute to a higher rate of surgical resection.

EFFECT OF COVID 19 PANDEMIC ON PANCREATIC CANCER SURGERY

Abstract&#x0D; Aim: The chaos experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic caused disruptions in the treatments of pancreatic cancer patients; both the ones who were newly diagnosed and the ones who had ongoing treatments. It also caused delays in the diagnosis of pancreas tumors and thus changes in the treatments which would be planned. For these reasons, more problems might arise in patients who had pancreatic surgeries during this interval. In this study, we aim to compare postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients who had pancreatic surgery due to diagnosis or suspect of cancer before and during Covid-19 pandemic.&#x0D; Material and Method: Data of patients who had pancreatic surgery due to pancreas cancer between 2017-2022 were recorded prospectively. A total of 226 patients were included. There were 142 patients in Pre-Covid group, and 84 patients with pancreas cancer in the Post-Covid group. Patients who were accepted as inoperative during surgery or the ones who had palliative surgery were excluded.&#x0D; Results: Preoperative biliary stent or percutaneous biliary drainage procedures were compared in patients with pancreatic cancers and these were performed more often in Post-Covid group than in Pre-Covid group during pandemic period. Biliary drainage was performed to 31 patients in Pre-Covid group (28.1%), and 32 (46.3%) patients in Post-Covid group (p=0.013). Five patients (3.5%) in Pre-Covid group, 15 patients (17.8%) in Post-Covid group had neoadjuvant therapy (p=0.000). Patients in Post-Covid group had significantly more neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Vascular resection was performed for 14 patients (9.8%) in Pre-Covid group, and 16 (19%) patients in Post-Covid group. Rate of vascular resection was significantly higher in Post-Covid group (p=0.049). Nine (6.3%) patients in Pre-Covid group, and 12 (14.2%) patients in Post-Covid group had extra-organ resection. Extra-organ resection was significantly higher in Post-Covid group than in Pre-Covid group (p=0.047).

Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage procedures may affect intrahepatic recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection.

468 Background: To determine the impact of preoperative endoscopic nasal biliary drainage (ENBD) and/or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) procedures on intrahepatic recurrence rate in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection. Methods: Between January 2005 and January 2023, 143 patients diagnosed cholangiocarcinoma and received surgical resection. Among 143 patients, 99 patients were treated with preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD. We retrospectively analysed prognostic factors (age, gender, preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD, tumor differentiation, pT factor, lymph node metastasis, surgical margin, lymphovascular invasion, preoperative maximal total bilirubin, postoperative chemoradiation/chemotherapy/radiation therapy, CA19-9) for recurrence after surgical resection. Results: Intrahepatic recurrence after surgical resection was detected in 22 /99(22.2%) patients with preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD, and 5/44(11.4%) patients without preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD for median period of 12 months (range 0-48). On univariate analysis, intrahepatic recurrence rate of patients who underwent ENBD and/or ERBD (n=99) was higher than that of patients who did not (n=44) ( P=0.090) and and that of patients who had T3/T4 factor (n=74) was higher than that of who had T1/T2 factor (n=69) (P=0.168). Intrahepatic recurrence rateof patients who had elevated CA19-9 (&gt; 200) (n=49) was higher than that of patients who had not (n=94) ( P=0.002). In multivariate analyses, preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD and elevated serum CA19-9 level (&gt;200 ng/mL) were prognostic factors for intrahepatic recurrence, with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.154 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.893-7.626, P = 0.080) and 3.647, (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.660-8.011, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative preoperative endoscopic nasal biliary drainage (ENBD) and/or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) procedures may affect the intrahepatic recurrence of tumor in patient with cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection. And serum elevated CA 19-9 level affected intrahepatic recurrence of tumor in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection.