Bilateral Ramus Osteotomy Research Articles

Assessing the Effectiveness of Combined Analgesics for Bilateral Ramus Osteotomies.

Pain management is important for alleviating patients' suffering and early recovery. Although analgesic combinations are known to be effective, a comparison of the effectiveness of different combinations has never been performed specifically for ramus osteotomy procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this observational retrospective cohort study was to identify an effective combination for pain management throughout the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period for patients undergoing bilateral ramus osteotomy procedures. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who had undergone bilateral mandibular ramus osteotomies over a 2-year period. The analyzed predictor variables included patient gender, age, body weight, operation, anesthetic method, duration of operation, intraoperative use of fentanyl, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intravenous acetaminophen administered in the operating room at the end of the surgery. The outcome variable was the necessity for additional rescue analgesics (yes/no) in the recovery room. Bivariate statistics and multivariate analysis were computed with a p-value of <0.05. The study sample was comprised of 78 patients requiring bilateral mandibular ramus osteotomies. From the multivariate analysis, the combination of NSAIDs-acetaminophen-fentanyl was an independent factor for no additional rescue analgesics during the first 1 hour after bilateral ramus osteotomies, indicating that the combination is significantly effective for bilateral ramus osteotomies compared with the other combinations. Considering that this study consisted of a small sample size, the results of this study suggest that some of the combinations, particularly NSAIDs-acetaminophen-fentanyl, are more effective than NSAIDs alone for postoperative pain control immediately following bilateral ramus osteotomy procedures.

Management of posttraumatic malocclusion caused by condylar process fractures

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of orthognathic surgery in cases with posttraumatic malocclusion as a long-term complication of condylar process fractures. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study on 21 patients with posttraumatic malocculsions attributable to condylar process fractures was performed. In group I, 15 patients were treated for asymmetric malocclusion with unilateral or bilateral mandibular ramus osteotomies. In group II, six patients were treated for anterior open bit with either a Le Fort I osteotomy (n = 5) or a bilateral ramus osteotomy (n = 1). All patients had clinical and radiographic follow-up for at least 1 year. Results: Stable dental and cephalometric results were obtained in all patients except the one in group II who was treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. In two cases, both in the asymmetric group, minor occlusal interferences had to be treated by equilibration in the early postoperative period. Conclusions: Orthognathic surgery is a predictable and stable method for the treatment of posttraumatic malocclusion due to condylar process fractures. Maxillary orthognathic surgery is successful in correcting symmetric anterior open bites due to bilateral condylar process fractures. Because posttraumatic malocclusion is a rare complication after closed treatment of condylar process fractures, and it can be treated satisfactorily using orthognathic surgery, routine open reduction and fixation of condylar process fractures is not indicated to prevent posttraumatic malocclusion.

Treatment of condylar hyperplasia of the mandible using unilateral ramus osteotomies

Purpose: The long-term outcome of bilateral and unilateral ramus osteotomies used for the treatment of unilateral condylar hyperplasia of the mandible are evaluated and compared. Materials and Methods: Thirteen cases of unilateral condylar hyperplasia of the mandible were surgically treated during a 10-year period from 1985 to 1995. Seven of the patients were treated by bilateral ramus osteotomies alone; six were treated by unilateral ramus osteotomies of the affected side. Unilateral ramus osteotomy was combined with a maxillary Le Fort I procedure in two of the six cases. Preoperative analysis of patients, indications for case selection, and postoperative results relating to facial symmetry, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain, occlusion, and stability were compared in the two groups. Results: The postoperative findings and long-term results in both groups of patients were favorable. Symmetry, arch coordination, and occlusion remained stable. TMJ pain and dysfunction were invariably cured postoperatively. Unilateral ramus osteotomies alone, or in combination with maxillary surgery when deemed feasible and applicable by preoperative clinical analysis, was sufficient to restore symmetry and occlusion in dentally compensated cases. Conclusions: This study shows that patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia of the mandible and deviation can be treated favorably by unilateral ramus osteotomy of the affected side; bilateral ramus osteotomy did not have any advantage in such cases. In addition, this procedure, combined with a Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla, was also effective in restoring occlusal canting and facial symmetry in dentally compensated cases. However, bilateral ramus osteotomy was required in prognathic cases and in cases in which a unilateral procedure would cause excessive rotation of the contralateral condyle.

Management of malunited mandibular condylar fractures

The non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures, may occasionally result in articular imbalance and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. This may be attributed to condylar head displacement and resorption, resulting in a shortened vertical ramus and lost posterior vertical facial height. Restoring the vertical ramus height is essential in the treatment of such dysfunction, and may be accomplished by unilateral, or bilateral ramus osteotomies. Four examples of patients treated with mandibular ramus osteotomies to restore vertical ramus height, with subsequent improvement in occlusal balance and function are presented. The use of the sagittal split mandibular osteotomy and the external vertical ramus osteotomy, stabilized with small osseous plates, and monocortical screws, is discussed.