Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

Abstract PO2-22-09: The impact of blood loss and blood pressure management in DIEP flap surgery– a retrospective analysis of 206 patients

Abstract Introduction: Autologous breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has excellent success rates and a natural aesthetic result. Therefore, this method and its management are of great importance in modern oncoplastic surgery. In particular, women who have undergone radiation therapy after mastectomy benefit from this satisfactory and usually uncomplicated method of breast reconstruction. To achieve a desirable outcome, the effects of blood loss and blood pressure management may play an important role. In this analysis, we hypothesize that neither postoperative blood pressure management (using catecholamines) nor the amount of blood loss (defined by the median hemoglobin level difference) will worsen the surgical outcome or increase the complication rate. Patients and Methods: We performed a multicenter, multisurgeon retrospective analysis with the following primary end points: intraoperative blood loss and postoperative blood pressure management. Secondary endpoints included serious complications including flap loss and minor complications. Patients (n=194) were included from 2014-2018 at St. Antonius Hospital in Eschweiler and from 2016 to July 2018 at the Cologne Municipal Breast Cancer Center in Holweide. Patients underwent either unilateral (n=180) or bilateral (n=13) breast reconstructions with DIEP flaps, resulting in a total of n=206 cases. The subgroup regarding blood pressure management was defined by cohorts with or without catecholamine administration and included all n=206 cases. Blood loss was defined by median hemoglobin level difference and could be calculated in n=199 cases. The cohorts of the two subgroups were comparable. Results: Six flap losses were detected in a total of 206 cases (2.9%). The distribution of flap losses in the blood pressure management subgroup was not statistically significant (p=.67), while the test was not available for the blood loss subgroup. Furthermore, the analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the rates of overall complications related to the amount of blood loss intraoperatively (p= .06) or blood pressure management postoperatively (p= .19). Conclusion: DIEP flap surgery is a safe method for autologous breast reconstruction, independent of blood loss and blood pressure management. Citation Format: Hanna Fritsch, Cosima Schreiber, Wolfram Malter, Matthias Warm, Max Zinser, Alexander Bach, Christian Eichler. The impact of blood loss and blood pressure management in DIEP flap surgery– a retrospective analysis of 206 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-09.

Bilateral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Unilateral Radiotherapy: A Matched Cohort Study Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Skin-sparing Mastectomy.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) preserves the natural nipple-areola complex and entire native breast skin, with the goal of better cosmetic outcomes in breast reconstruction. In bilateral TE/implant-based reconstruction requiring unilateral postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), progressive radiation-induced fibrosis can lead to increasing nipple asymmetry with cosmetic dissatisfaction. Thus, PMRT may ultimately negate the intended positive cosmetic value of NSM compared with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). This study compares (1) surgical complications, (2) patient satisfaction, and (3) aesthetic outcomes between NSM versus SSM in bilateral implant-based reconstruction with unilateral PMRT. This retrospective matched cohort study included consecutive NSM patients with bilateral TE/implant breast reconstruction + unilateral PMRT matched 1:2 to SSM group. Patients completed PMRT and TE exchange to implants. Demographics, oncologic stage, comorbidities, and complications were collected. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by BREAST-Q. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed by blinded reviewers with a five-point Likert scale. Among 58 patients who underwent bilateral TE/implant reconstruction with unilateral PMRT, 17 NSM patients were matched to 41 SSM patients by age, body mass index, and comorbidities. No significant differences existed in overall surgical complications and individual BREAST-Q questionnaire scores between cohorts. However, aesthetic outcomes scores were higher in SSM compared with NSM. Although NSM is generally associated with superior cosmetic outcomes compared with SSM, it has far less impact in bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction with unilateral PMRT due to the negative postradiotherapy effect on nipple symmetry.

Can preoperative epigenetic screening of VEGF in patients undergoing bilateral immediate DIEP breast reconstruction surgery stratify risk of surgical complications leading to flap loss and personalise surgical management

Can preoperative epigenetic screening of VEGF in patients undergoing bilateral immediate DIEP breast reconstruction surgery stratify risk of surgical complications leading to flap loss and personalise surgical management

Simultaneous Co-surgeon Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstructions: Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes.

A co-surgeon model is known to be favorable in microvascular breast reconstruction, but simultaneous co-surgeon deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap cases have not been well-studied. The authors hypothesize that performing two simultaneous co-surgeon bilateral DIEP flap reconstructions results in non-inferior clinical outcomes and may improve patient access to care. A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing record review to identify all cases of co-surgeon free-flap breast reconstructions over a 38-month period. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions with the same two co-surgeons were identified. The control group consisted of subjects who underwent non-simultaneous reconstruction by the same co-surgeons within the same, preceding, or following month of those in the study group. Primary outcome variables were 90-day postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes were operating time, ischemia time, and length of stay. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Overall, 137 subjects were identified and 64 met the inclusion criteria (n=28 study, n=36 control). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in body mass index, radiation, trainee experience, flap perforator number, immediate/delayed reconstruction, or length of stay. There were also no statistically significant differences in complications, including flap loss, anastomosis revision, take-back to the operating room, or re-admission. Operative time was longer in the simultaneous DIEP group (540.5 vs. 443.5 min, p<0.01), but ischemia time was shorter in the simultaneous group (64.0 vs. 80.5min, p<0.01). A simultaneous co-surgeon approach to bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction may improve access to care and does not result in a higher complication rate compared with non-simultaneous bilateral DIEP flaps.

The Impact of Technical Innovations and Donor-Site Mesh Repair on Autologous Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction-A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefit that may be achieved through the introduction of technical innovations and the incorporation of mesh for fascial donor site closure in uni- and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue. Methods: A retrospective single-center review of all breast reconstructions with a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap between January 2004 and December 2019 was performed. Donor and recipient site complications and operation times were evaluated before and after the implementation of coupler anastomoses, preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), indocyanine green (ICG) angiography, and the inclusion of mesh in donor site repair. Results: A total of 396 patients were included, accounting for 447 flaps. Operation time was significantly shorter in unilateral reconstructions after the implementation of CTA (p < 0.0001). ICG angiography significantly reduced the rates of partial flap loss (p = 0.02) and wound healing disorders (p = 0.02). For unilateral reconstructions, abdominal bulging or hernia was observed more often in MS1-TRAM flaps without synthetic mesh repair (p = 0.001), whereas conservatively treated seroma developed more frequently after mesh implantation (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Recent technological advancements developed over the past few decades have made a substantial impact on decreasing surgical duration and enhancing procedure safety.

66 Predictors of Autologous Fat Grafting in Immediate, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Patients frequently need or desire fat grafting to improve common issues such as implant visibility and contour deformity, often done as a second, staged procedure following immediate reconstruction. This study aimed to identify which patient factors and reconstructive techniques predict the need for revision with AFG after IBBR METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Patients who underwent IBBR with either tissue expanders or implants following mastectomy from 2017 to 2021 were identified. Demographics, comorbidities, and the postoperative course were reviewed. The primary outcome variable was AFG after the initial reconstruction. Univariate and regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of AFG. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Five-hundred twenty-nine patients were included in our analysis, with 43% having AFG. Univariate regression displayed single-stage reconstruction (OR=0.53, 95% 0.37-0.75) and previous radiation (OR 0.59, 95% 0.35-0.99) negatively predicted the need for AFG, while bilateral breast reconstruction (BBR) was a predictor (OR 2.32, 95% 1.58-3.4). On multivariate analysis, decreasing age and BBR remained predictive of AFG. The odds of AFG decreased by 3% for every one-unit increase in age (95% CI [0.96, 0.99]). Interestingly, neither pre-pectoral breast reconstruction nor specimen weight:implant ratio was associated with increased need for AFG on univariate/multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patients requiring AFG were likely younger and had undergone BBR with tissue expanders. Plane of implant did not appear to affect need for AFG. Knowledge of these predictive factors may help plastic surgeons in preoperative counseling before implant-based breast reconstruction.

Robotic Repair: An Alternative Technique for Rectus Diastasis and Abdominal Bulge Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Despite advances in perforator dissection, abdominal morbidity still occurs. Traditional rectus diastasis (RD), abdominal bulge, and hernia repair with open techniques are associated with higher complication rates and recurrence. We present a novel case series of robotic repair of symptomatic RD and/or abdominal bulge with concurrent hernia following DIEP flap surgery. A single-center, retrospective review was conducted on 10 patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and subsequent robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge and hernia. Pre-operative demographics and post-operative clinical outcomes were reviewed. RD up to 5 cm, abdominal bulge, and any concurrent ventral/umbilical hernias were repaired robotically via retrorectus plication and macroporus mesh reinforcement. The average age and BMI were 49 years (range 41-63) and 31 kg/m2 (range 26-44), respectively. The average number of perforators harvested per flap was 2.5 (range 1-4). Average RD and hernia size were 3.95 cm (range 2-5) and 5.8 cm2 (1-15), respectively. Eight patients stayed one night in the hospital, two went home the same day as the robotic repair. No patients converted to open technique and none experienced complications within 30 days. For the patients who experience donor site morbidity following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, minimally invasive robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge with hernia can be performed with mesh reinforcement. This technique is effective with low complication rates and should be considered over open repair.

Initial Experience with Unidirectional Barbed Suture for Abdominal Donor Site Closure in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a predominant technique for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the best method of abdominal fascial closure in this technique is not well defined. This study details our initial experience with unidirectional barbed suture-only repair of abdominal donor site fascia. Patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and abdominal fascial closure with Stratafix Symmetric Polydioxanone PDS Plus were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding pertinent patient history, medical comorbidities, risk factors, and surgical technique was extracted, along with the incidence of eight separate postoperative abdominal surgical site occurrences. Retrospective review identified 43 patients who underwent 19 unilateral and 24 bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedures (n = 67). Average patient follow-up was 791 days (range 153-1769). Six patients (14%) had a complication of the donor site. Seroma was most frequent (n = 3, 7%), followed by surgical site infection (n = 2, 5%). One patient had incisional dehiscence (2%) and another patient developed bulging (2%). No patients had chronic pain, weakness, hematoma, or hernia postoperatively. Patients with donor site complications had a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery significantly more often than the patients without donor site complications (100% versus 49%; P = 0.032). Abdominal fascial repair with Stratafix Symmetric suture alone led to low rates of abdominal donor site morbidity, including no hernia and rare bulging, following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Additional advantages of this technique may be reduced operative times and lower operative costs compared with alternative methods of fascial repair, although prospective and randomized studies are warranted.

Effects of Marijuana Use in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Marijuana use has been associated with vascular inflammation and clotting, resulting in endothelial damage and arteritis. As marijuana use rises in the United States, few studies have evaluated its impact on surgical outcomes and wound healing in free flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing abdominal free flap breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2022 at a large metropolitan healthcare system was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and complications were analyzed. Minor complications were defined as skin or fat necrosis not requiring intervention, nipple loss, any wound requiring management in the clinic, hematoma, and seroma. Major complications were defined as reoperation, flap loss, cardiac or thromboembolic events, and hospital readmission. Active marijuana users were those with marijuana use within 12 weeks of surgery. In total, 168 patients underwent 276 deep inferior epigastric artery-based flaps for breast reconstruction. There were 21 active marijuana users. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, cancer treatment, or minor and major complications. However, there were higher rates of active nicotine use (P = 0.001) and anxiety/depression amongst active marijuana users (P = 0.002). Active users had higher rates of bilateral breast reconstruction (P = 0.029), but no significant differences in other operative details. Active marijuana use of unknown frequency may be safe in patients undergoing breast free flap reconstruction. Advising marijuana abstinence preoperatively may not alter patient outcomes. Further studies of greater sample size are needed to evaluate marijuana's impact on outcomes associated with breast reconstruction using free flap.

Existing Psychiatric Diagnoses Among Breast Cancer Patients Interact with Outcomes After Autologous and Implant-Based Bilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BackgroundBreast reconstruction is an integral postoncologic procedure that has been associated with improved mental health and psychological outcomes. The possible interaction between existing psychiatric diagnoses hospital courses and postoperative complications warrants further exploration. MethodsBilateral breast reconstruction patients were identified from the 2016 to 2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP - NIS). Number and type of psychiatric diagnoses within the cohort were then evaluated using a host of ICD-10 codes. A propensity score analysis was applied to control for confounding variables such as demographics, existing comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. A binary logistic regression model was then used to identify the prediction value of psychiatric diagnosis and its interaction with modality of reconstruction for objective outcomes like length of hospital stay, treatment charge, and postoperative complications. ResultsA total of 10,114 patients were identified as the final cohort of breast reconstruction patients. 2621 (25.9%) patients possessed an average of 1.4 ± 0.6 existing psychiatric diagnoses. Presence of at least 1 psychiatric diagnosis was a strong predictor alone for extended length of stay (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.28-1.41, P < .001) and occurrence of postoperative complications (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.21-1.41, P < .001). Psychiatric diagnosis displayed a significant interaction with modality of breast reconstruction and conferred a lower increase in risk of extended length of stay in autologous reconstruction when compared to implant-based reconstruction (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.89, P < .001). ConclusionExisting psychiatric diagnoses were shown to strongly predict and modulate risk of adverse postoperative outcomes depending on modality of reconstruction.

Co-surgeon versus Single-surgeon Outcomes in Free Tissue Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.

Autologous breast reconstruction offers superior long-term patient reported outcomes compared with implant-based reconstruction. Universal adoption of free tissue transfer has been hindered by procedural complexity and long operative time with microsurgery. In many specialties, co-surgeon (CS) approaches are reported to decrease operative time while improving surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the available literature to evaluate the potential benefit of a CS approach in autologous free tissue breast reconstruction versus single-surgeon (SS). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE from inception to December 2022. Published reports comparing CS to SS approaches in uni- and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction were identified. Primary outcomes included operative time, postoperative outcomes, processes of care, and financial impact. Risk of bias was assessed and outcomes were characterized with effect sizes. Eight retrospective studies reporting on 9,425 patients were included. Compared with SS, CS approach was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (SMD -0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.01 to -0.29, p < 0.001), with the largest effect size in bilateral reconstructions (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.02, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.67, p < 0.00001). CS was also associated with a significant decrease in length of hospitalization (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.07, p = 0.02). Odds of flap failure or surgical complications including surgical site infection, hematoma, fat necrosis, and reexploration were not significantly different. CS free tissue breast reconstruction significantly shortens operative time and length of hospitalization compared with SS approaches without compromising postoperative outcomes. Further research should model processes and financial viability of its adoption in a variety of health care models.

Impact of autologous breast reconstruction on bra fit.

To inform bra design by analyzing 3D surface images of breast cancer patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction. We computed bra design measurements on 3D surface images of patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction. Breast measurements and right-left symmetry between preoperative baseline and postoperative time points were compared using either paired Student t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on the data's distribution. Regression analysis determined associations between measurements and patient characteristics such as age. Postoperative measurements and symmetry differences were also compared between autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. Among participants who underwent bilateral autologous breast reconstruction, the reconstructed breasts were smaller and positioned higher on the chest wall than their native breasts. For patients who underwent unilateral reconstruction, similar postoperative changes were observed in the contralateral breast due to symmetry procedures. Overall, for participants whose baseline breast measurements showed substantial asymmetry, unilateral reconstruction decreased right-left asymmetry whereas bilateral reconstruction amplified right-left asymmetry. Preoperative baseline breast measurements, age, and BMI were statistically significantly associated with most postoperative breast measurements for participants who underwent bilateral autologous reconstruction. Compared to implant-based reconstruction, autologous reconstruction resulted in fewer changes in breast shape and symmetry that are pertinent to bra fit. Preoperative baseline breast measurements, age, and BMI can impact bra designs for breast cancer survivors who undergo autologous reconstruction due to size, shape, and symmetry changes. Bra needs of people who undergo autologous reconstruction differ from those who undergo implant-based reconstruction.

Bilateral LAP flap breast reconstruction: a case report

Bilateral LAP flap breast reconstruction: a case report

Identifying variation in the cost of abdominally based breast reconstruction in the UK

To understand variation in the cost of autologous breast reconstruction in the UK, including identifying key areas of cost variability, differences between and within units and the impact of enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS). A micro-costing study was designed based on the responses to a national survey of clinical preferences completed by the majority of plastic surgeons and anaesthetists involved in the UK. Detailed costs were estimated from macro elements such as ward and theatre running costs, down to that of surgical meshes, anaesthetic drugs and flap monitoring devices. The largest variation in cost arose from postoperative location and length of stay, preoperative imaging and flap monitoring strategies. Plastic surgeon costs varied from £1282 to £3141, whereas anaesthetic costs were between £32 and £151 (not including salary). Estimated cost variation within units was up to £893 per case. Units with ERAS had significantly lower total costs than those without (p < 0.05). This study reveals significant cost variation in breast reconstruction in the UK based on clinician preferences. Many areas of practice driving this variation lack strong evidence of any clinical advantage. The total cost of a deep inferior epigastric perforator in the majority, if not all units, likely surpasses the national tariff for reimbursement, particularly when considering additional resource demand for immediate and bilateral breast reconstruction, as well as future symmetrisation procedures. Whilst units should look to streamline costs through ERAS, there should also be a realistic tariff that promotes excellent care.

The transverse upper gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction outcomes from a single centre experience.

The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap procedure is an alternative procedure for autologous breast reconstruction, that is indicated in patients with a low body mass index (BMI) and small to moderate sized breasts. We investigated patient satisfaction of all TUG flap breast reconstructions at Royal Free Hospital. A retrospective review of all patients who had undergone a TUG flap procedure was performed using Electronic Patient Records between October 2010 and October 2021 in Royal Free Hospital. We collected patient demographic data and surveyed our cohort by telephone, investigating patient satisfaction with a 31-item questionnaire. From 2010 to 2021, 57 TUG procedures for autologous breast reconstruction were carried out on 36 patients. One patient died 6 years postoperatively. Patient age ranged from 29-74 with an average of 49.5 years. Also, 3/57 flaps failed, and 1 patient died 6 years postoperatively. Twenty one out of 35 patients responded to the telephone call survey. Out of the survey respondents 11/21 underwent unilateral breast reconstruction and 10/21 underwent bilateral breast reconstruction. The BODY-Q scale in appraisal of thighs reported an overall patient satisfaction mean score of 75.6±27.4 points. The BREAST-Q scale in breast satisfaction reported an overall patient satisfaction mean score of 61.5±24.1 points. Overall, 19/21 of patients were satisfied with the outcome of the TUG procedure. Royal Free Hospital reported excellent patient satisfaction scores. The TUG procedure is a suitable method for patient's undergoing autologous breast reconstruction. However, patient expectations regarding breast satisfaction should be managed.

Breast Reconstruction With Simultaneous Bilateral Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps Improves Waistline Definition and Buttock Projection.

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap is a valuable secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction when abdominal donor sites are not available. The aim of this study was to determine how the LAP donor site affects waistline and gluteal proportions, and whether LAP flaps may produce potential secondary benefits concerning donor site aesthetics. A retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction with LAP flaps (100 flaps) between 2018 and 2022 was performed. Patient characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded. Pre- and postoperative standardized frontal and lateral patient photographs were analyzed to identify postoperative changes in waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) to assess waistline definition and buttock projection. The patients' individual perception of postoperative aesthetic changes to their waistline and buttocks was determined by an electronic survey. The patients had a mean age of 51 years (range, 24-63 years) and a mean BMI of 26.9 kg/m2 (range, 19.3-37.4 kg/m2). Postoperative donor site complications included seroma (n = 10), wound dehiscence (n = 5), hematoma (n = 4), and wound infection (n = 2). Flap loss rate was 2%. After reconstruction, patients were found to have a more defined waistline, indicated by a significantly decreased WHR on frontal images (mean [standard error of the mean], 0.85 [0.05] vs 0.80 [0.05], P < .005) and a more projected buttocks indicated by a significant reduction in WHR on lateral images (0.92 [0.07] vs 0.87 [0.07], P < .0001). Among the patients who responded to the survey, 73% indicated that their waistline had aesthetically improved, 6.7% felt it had not changed, and 20% felt that it had worsened. An aesthetic improvement of the buttocks was reported by 53%, 40% felt their buttocks had not changed, and 6.7% felt their buttocks appearance had worsened. Bilateral LAP flap breast reconstruction leads to improved waistline definition and buttock projection, bringing patients closer to ideal aesthetic proportions. This reconstructive approach is ideal for patients who are not candidates for abdominal free flaps, but who demonstrate excess flank tissue and seek a more defined waistline and projected buttocks.

977 The Impact of Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy on Immediate Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

Abstract Aim Radiotherapy following free flap breast reconstruction has historically been thought to increase complication rates, worsen patient reported outcomes (PROs) and lead to poorer cosmetic results. We aim to assess the impact post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has on immediate free flap breast reconstruction using these variables, with patients acting as inherent controls. Method We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients receiving immediate bilateral free flap breast reconstruction followed by unilateral radiotherapy between 2008 and 2022. Complication rates were assessed by comparing prevalence of fat necrosis, volume depletion requiring lipofilling, and flap loss among irradiated vs non-irradiated breasts. PROs were assessed by comparing “Satisfaction with Breasts” and “Chest Physical Well-Being” (two sections of the Breast-Q survey) among irradiated vs non-irradiated breasts. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed by scoring postoperative pre-radiotherapy and postoperative post-radiotherapy patient images using “Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale” (OBCS) and “Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale” (HBCS). Results 9 patients underwent immediate bilateral free flap breast reconstruction followed by unilateral radiotherapy. Median age was 40 years (IQR 32-44). Complication rates did not vary significantly between irradiated and non-radiated breasts. “Satisfaction with Breasts” did not vary significantly between irradiated and non-radiated breasts; however, “Chest Physical Well-Being” did vary significantly between both breasts. Cosmetic outcomes did not vary significantly between pre-radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy images. Conclusions PMRT following immediate free flap breast reconstruction does not have significant deleterious effects on complication rates, patient satisfaction with breasts or cosmetic outcomes. However, radiotherapy has a significant effect on patient’s chest physical well-being, hence we aim to study this further.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Hybrid Breast Reconstruction.

Hybrid breast reconstruction combines free tissue transfer with implant placement. Various mesh products have been successfully used to secure the implant position in these reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigate the impact of mesh type on long-term outcomes following hybrid breast reconstruction. A retrospective analysis of all patients with at least 24 months of follow-up after immediate bilateral prepectoral hybrid breast reconstruction was performed. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate long-term outcomes and compare breasts reconstructed with polyglactin mesh versus acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Thirty-nine patients (78 breasts) who underwent hybrid breast reconstruction with an average follow-up period of 50.4 months (range, 27 to 73 months) were included in the study. Post-operative complications included hematoma [n = 2 (2.6 percent)], mastectomy skin necrosis [n = 12 (15.4 percent)], and fat necrosis [n = 6 (7.7%)]. There were no instances of implant infection, implant exposure, or flap failure. Polyglactin mesh and ADM were used in 24 breasts and 54 breasts, respectively. Implant malposition and capsular contracture occurred more frequently in the polyglactin cohort leading to 10 (41.7 percent) instances of re-operation for implant replacement compared to only 1 (1.9 percent) in the ADM cohort (p < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, polyglactin mesh was associated with a 36-fold greater probability of requiring implant replacement compared to ADM (p = 0.006). ADM (vs. polyglactin mesh) is associated with lower rates of capsular contracture and implant malposition in the context of hybrid breast reconstruction.

The delay procedure in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.

The delay procedure in DIEP flap breast reconstruction, in which the reduced-caliber choke vessels play a major role, can provide more well-perfused tissue than a standard DIEP flap. The aim of this study was to review our experience with this technique, to evaluate the indications, and to analyze the surgical outcomes. A retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive DIEP delay procedures performed between March 2019 and June 2021. Patient demographics, operative details, and complications were registered. Patients had preoperative imaging by MRA to select dominant perforators. The surgical technique involves a two-stage operation. During the first operation the flaps were pedicled on a dominant perforator and a lateral skin bridge extending towards the lateral flank and lumbar fat, and in a second stage the flap is harvested and transferred. A total of 82 extended DIEP delay procedures were performed to reconstruct 154 breasts. The majority were bilateral breast reconstructions (87.8%). The delay procedure was used for 38 primary reconstructions (46.3%) and 32 tertiary reconstructions (39.0%). The primary indication was the need for additional volume (79.3%), followed by extensive abdominal scarring and liposuction. After the first operation seroma was the most frequently observed complication (7.3%). After the second operation three total flap losses (1.9%) were observed. The delay procedure in DIEP flap breast reconstruction results in the harvest of a good amount of abdominal tissue by adding a preliminary procedure. This technique can convert patients previously considered unsuitable into suitable candidates for abdominal-based breast reconstruction.

The impact of using the internal mammary artery as a recipient vessel on medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion in autologous breast reconstruction: An observational study using indocyanine green

The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the preferred recipient vessel for microvascular anastomosis in immediate autologous breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). Although the IMA accounts for approximately 60% of the blood supply to the breast, the exact contribution to the mastectomy skin flap perfusion is unclear. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the impact of using the IMA as a recipient vessel on medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion assessed with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). This observational study included ten consecutive women who underwent immediate autologous breast reconstructions following SSM. Two intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) assessments were performed to assess tissue perfusion of the upper and lower part of the medial mastectomy skin flap: the first following the SSM and the second after clamping the IMA. During a 120-second angiography, three additional images were made after 60, 90, and 120s. The ICG inflow time and mean, minimum, and maximum fluorescence intensities (FIs) were obtained. Four unilateral and six bilateral autologous breast reconstructions were included. There was no difference in tissue perfusion when comparing the inflow time (24.1s vs. 23.0s, P=0.348), the mean FI (131.4 vs. 124.0, P=0.126), minimum FI (28.6 vs. 33.4, P=0.086), and maximum FI (253.1 vs. 247.6, P=0.166) before and after clamping the IMA. According to this study, the use of the IMA as a recipient vessel does not reduce medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion in patients undergoing immediate autologous breast reconstructions following SSM.