Bevacizumab-containing Regimens Research Articles

Bevacizumab is associated with a higher gastrointestinal/genitourinary fistula or perforation risk in cervical cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy.

Bevacizumab serves as an effective treatment in cervical cancer patients with metastatic, recurrent, or advanced disease. However, gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicities have been observed after bevacizumab treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstay of treatment of cervical cancer. To investigate the risk of GI/GU toxicities with bevacizumab plus RT compared with RT alone in cervical cancer patients. In this meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 25, 2022. Cohort studies evaluating the association between bevacizumab and GI/GU fistula or perforation in irradiated metastatic, recurrent, or advanced cervical cancer patients. Results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The inconsistency test (I2) was used to assess heterogeneity. Egger's regression test with a two-tailed P value was used to evaluate publication bias. Four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 597 women included. There was a significant association between GI fistula/perforation and GU fistula/perforation in irradiated cervical cancer patients receiving bevacizumab (OR 4.03 [95% CI: 1.76-9.20] and OR 4.71 [95% CI: 1.51-14.70], respectively). The bevacizumab-containing regimen was associated with an increased risk of GI or GU toxicities in cervical cancer individuals undergoing pelvic RT. These results suggest the bevacizumab-associated benefits and risk should be better weighted to reach an optimal treatment strategy. Further investigation on optimal dosage and timing of bevacizumab and RT is vital to minimize the adverse events and maximize the benefits.

A prognostic model for overall survival in recurrent glioma patients treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy

Predictive markers and prognostic models are useful for the individualization of cancer treatment. In this study, we sought to identify clinical and molecular factors to predict overall survival in recurrent glioma patients receiving bevacizumab-containing regimens. A cohort of 102 patients was retrospectively collected from June 2011 to January 2022 at our institution. A nomogram was generated by Cox regression and feature selection algorithms based on 19 clinicopathological and 60 molecular variables. The model's performance was internally evaluated by bootstrapping in terms of discrimination and calibration. The median overall survival from the initiation of bevacizumab administration to death or last follow-up was 11.6 months (95% CI: 9.2–13.8 months) for all 102 patients, 10.2 months (95% CI: 6.4–13.3 months) for 66 patients with grade 4 tumors, and 13.8 months (lower limit of 95% CI: 11.5 months) for 36 patients with tumors of grade lower or not available. In the final model, a lower WHO 2021 grade (Grade lower or not available vs. Grade 4, HR: 0.398, 95% CI: 0.223–0.708, p = 0.00172), having received adjuvant radiochemotherapy (Yes vs. No, HR: 0.488, 95% CI: 0.268–0.888, p = 0.0189), and wildtype EGFR (Wildtype vs. Altered, HR: 0.193, 95% CI: 0.0506–0.733, p = 0.0157; Not available vs. Altered, HR: 0.386, 95% CI: 0.184–0.810, p = 0.0118) were significantly associated with longer overall survival in multivariate Cox regression. The overall concordance index was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.566–0.714), and the areas under the time-dependent curves for 6-, 12-, and 18-month overall survival were 0.677 (95% CI: 0.516–0.816), 0.654 (95% CI: 0.470–0.823), and 0.675 (95% CI: 0.491–0.860), respectively. A prognostic model for overall survival in recurrent glioma patients treated with bevacizumab-based therapy was established and internally validated. It could serve as a reference tool for clinicians to assess the extent the patients may benefit from bevacizumab and stratify their treatment response.

TP53 Alteration and Its Effect on Pathologic Response Are Associated with Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of known gene alterations (RAS, TP53, APC, SMAD4, BRAF, and FBXW7) on pathologic response (PR) and their combined association with survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). From a prospectively maintained database, we collected data on 458 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after receiving the first-line preoperative chemotherapy between 2004 and 2020. Major PR was defined as tumor viability of less than 50% in all tumors. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that oxaliplatin-containing regimen (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.58–4.07, P < 0.001), bevacizumab-containing regimen (OR: 2.15, 95%CI: 1.36–3.39, P = 0.001), and TP53 alteration (OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.27–0.66, P < 0.001) were independently associated with major PR. Multivariate Cox regression also revealed that patients with TP53 wild-type and major PR (HR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.31–0.77, P = 0.002) and those with TP53 alteration and major PR (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.49–1.00, P = 0.048) had significantly better overall survival compared to those with minor PR. Further studies targeting the association of TP53 with PR and survival can help clarify the role of TP53 in CLM.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Incisional Hernia After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BackgroundIncisional hernia (IH) is common after major abdominal surgery; however, the incidence after hepatectomy for cancer has not been described. We analyzed incidence of and risk factors for IH after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). MethodsPatients who underwent open hepatectomy with midline or reverse-L incision for CLM at a single institution between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative CT scans were reviewed to identify IH and the time from hepatectomy to hernia. Cumulative IH incidence was calculated using competing risk analysis. Risk factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards model analysis. The relationship between IH incidence and preoperative body mass index (BMI) was estimated using a generalized additive model. ResultsAmong 470 patients (median follow-up: 16.9 months), IH rates at 12, 24, and 60 months were 41.5%, 51.0%, and 59.2%, respectively. Factors independently associated with IH were surgical site infection (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.16–2.06, P = 0.003) and BMI > 25 kg/m2 (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.45–2.61, P < 0.001). IH incidence was similar in patients undergoing midline and reverse-L incisions and patients who received and did not receive a bevacizumab-containing regimen. The 1-year IH rate increased with increasing number of risk factors (zero: 22.2%; one: 46.8%; two: 60.3%; P < 0.001). Estimated IH incidence was 10% for BMI of 15 kg/m2 and 80% for BMI of 40 kg/m2. ConclusionIH is common after open hepatectomy for CLM, particularly in obese patients and patients with surgical site infection. Surgeons should consider risk-mitigation strategies, including alternative fascial closure techniques.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab for Treating Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase II and III Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective To fully investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for glioblastoma. Methods Databases were searched for phase II/III randomized controlled trials treated with bevacizumab. Results Bevacizumab significantly improved the PFS in glioblastoma patients, but did not prolong OS. PFS was significantly prolonged in both first-line and second-line treatment. Bevacizumab plus temozolomide was correlated with improved PFS for patients with different MGMT methylation status. Bevacizumab could increase the risk of hypertension, proteinuria, thromboembolic, and infection. Hypertension should be well concerned. Conclusions Bevacizumab-containing regimen can significantly improve PFS, but did not prolong OS.

Bevacizumab-containing regimens for children with relapsed or refractory tumors.

We aimed to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab-containing regimens (BCRs) on the survival of children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Files of children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors treated with BCR were retrospectively reviewed for age, gender, follow-up time, histopathological diagnosis, adverse events observed with BCR, number of chemotherapy protocols used before BCR, the best overall response obtained with BCR, time to progression, number of BCR courses given to patients, the status of patient at last visit, and outcome. Thirty patients (16 boys, 14 girls) were treated with BCR. The median age at diagnosis was 8.5 (2 - 17) years and at the time of the study was 11 (3-21) years. The median follow-up time was 25.7 (5-79.4) months. The median follow-up time after the start of BCR was 3.2 (1-27) months. Histopathological diagnosis was central nervous system tumors in 25, Ewing sarcoma in two, osteosarcoma in two, and rhabdomyosarcoma in one patient. BCR was given as second-line in 21, third-line in six, and fourth-line protocol in three patients. No chemotherapy toxicity was observed in 22 (73.3%) patients. The best overall response was progressive disease in 17 (56.7%), partial response in seven (23.3%), and stable disease in 6 (20%) patients at first-response evaluation. The median time until progression was 77 (12-690) days. During the study period, 17 patients died of progressive disease. Our study revealed that adding antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab to cytotoxic chemotherapy provided no survival benefit in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors.

The Effect of Pleural Effusion on Prognosis in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Immunochemotherapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pleural effusion (PE) is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy. However, minimal data exists on PE for patients undergoing combined ICI and chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated how PE affects survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC undergoing this combined therapy. We identified patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and ICI therapy from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group-Immune Chemotherapy Database (OLCSG-ICD) between December 2018 and December 2020; the OLCSG-ICD includes the clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 institutions. Then, we analyzed the treatment outcomes based on the presence of PE. We identified 478 patients who underwent combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy; 357 patients did not have PE, and 121 patients did have PE. Patients with PE had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without PE (median PFS: 6.2 months versus 9.1 months; p &lt; 0.001; median OS: 16.4 months versus 27.7 months; p &lt; 0.001). The negative effect of PE differed based on the patient's programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status; with the effect being more evident in patients with high PD-L1 expression. In addition, PFS and OS did not differ between patients who did and did not undergo bevacizumab treatment; thus, bevacizumab-containing regimens did not improve the survival outcomes for patients with PE. PE is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy.

Patterns of first-line systemic therapy delivery and adoption of bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer in Ontario, Canada.

292 Background: Initial treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of combination of cytoreductive surgery (CSR) and/or chemotherapy. Targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have shown to improve outcomes in a subset population with high-risk features. Real-world patterns of systemic therapy delivery in EOC in the modern era are not well understood. Our objective is to evaluate the patterns of first-line systemic treatment of advanced EOC in Ontario, focusing on adoption of bevacizumab, which was approved for use in 2016. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population cohort study using administrative databases held at the ICES in Ontario, Canada. Patients diagnosed with non-mucinous EOC between 2014 and 2018 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry; early-stage disease was excluded. Information on systemic therapy was obtained from Activity Level Reporting and New Drug Funding Program databases. Provider of care (gynecologic oncologist vs medical oncologist) information was obtained from billing codes. Academic cancer centers were identified using validated systemic facility codes from Cancer Care Ontario. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression using SAS. Results: Out of 4,680 cases diagnosed with EOC during the study period, 3,632 (77.6%) were considered advanced stage. Median age of cohort was between 65-70, and the majority had Charlson score of 1-2 (97%) and are urban (91.8%). A total of 3,181 (87.6%) patients underwent CRS and 2,722(74.9%) patients underwent chemotherapy. Of those who received chemotherapy, 1,259 (46.2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 1,012 (37.2%) received upfront CRS, and 451(16.5%) received chemotherapy only. The majority of chemotherapy was delivered by gynecologic oncologists (60.6%) and in academic cancer centres (61.7%). There was no significant difference in use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy between medical oncologists and gynecologic oncologists (p = 0.67). Only 53 chemotherapy patients (1.9%) received bevacizumab containing-regimen in the first-line setting. Medical oncologists were 4 times more likely to administer bevacizumab-containing regimen compared to gynecologic oncologists (OR 4.03, 95% CI.29 – 7.36) after adjusting for age, stage, Charlson score and rurality score on logistic regression. Delivery of bevacizumab is relatively higher in non-academic cancer centres (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.32- 2.94) while 83% of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is delivered in academic cancer centres. Conclusions: Patterns of care of EOC in Ontario remain heterogenous between care providers and institutions, while uptake of bevacizumab for first-line treatment of EOC remains low. Factors leading to low uptake and real-world outcomes should be explored.

First-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Real-world experience from >2000 patients treated in the multicentre AVANTI study

AimThe multicentre non-interventional AVANTI study assessed safety, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes with approved first-line bevacizumab-containing regimens for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC) in German routine oncology practice. MethodsEligible patients had HER2-negative LR/MBC, no bevacizumab contraindications and no prior chemotherapy for LR/MBC. Chemotherapy schedule, diagnostics and follow-up were at physicians’ discretion. Data were collected for 1 year after starting bevacizumab, then every 6 months for 1.5 years (maximum follow-up: 2.5 years). Patients and physicians rated treatment satisfaction. Subgroup analyses were prespecified in clinically relevant populations, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). ResultsBetween November 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016, 2065 eligible patients at 346 centres received bevacizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine. Patients receiving bevacizumab–capecitabine were less likely to have de novo disease and more likely to have TNBC, age ≥60 years and prior anthracycline/taxane and/or endocrine therapy. Median PFS was 12.6 (95% CI 11.9–13.2) months (12.8 with bevacizumab–paclitaxel, 10.5 with bevacizumab–capecitabine); median OS was 23.9 (95% CI 22.2–25.1) months. Outcomes were worse in patients with TNBC, prior anthracycline/taxane or prior endocrine therapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 27% of patients. Treatment was discontinued for adverse events in 15%. Treatment satisfaction was rated as good or better by 304/394 responding patients (77%) at week 54 and in 1393/2065 patients (67%) by physicians overall. ConclusionsIn routine clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for LR/MBC were consistent with experience from phase III trials. Patient and physician treatment satisfaction showed high concordance.

The efficacy and safety profile of 2-weekly dosing of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer

BackgroundDespite being widely used, to date (June 2021), the regimen of bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) combined with chemotherapy is not approved in Japan for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the usage patterns of bevacizumab administered for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsWe obtained clinical data from 155 Japanese medical facilities between November 2013 and December 2018 via a survey. Items included the number of cases of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab according to dosage. For regimens including bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W, additional information was requested relating to concomitantly administered agents, and the efficacy and safety of the regimen.ResultsOf 1739 bevacizumab-containing regimens reported in 1633 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, 264 used 10 mg/kg Q2W. The overall response rate (ORR) with this regimen was 26.1%. Response rates varied according to regimen and were particularly favorable when bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W was administered with paclitaxel (ORR, 53.0%) versus liposomal doxorubicin (15.0%; P < 0.0001) and irinotecan (7.7%; P < 0.028). The most frequent Grade ≥ 3 adverse events associated with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W were neutropenia (11.7%) and hypertension (11.7%). The most frequent bevacizumab-associated Grade ≥ 3 adverse events with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus liposomal doxorubicin were hypertension (9.0% versus 13.9%) and proteinuria (3.0% versus 8.4%).ConclusionsBevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W appears efficacious for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, with a manageable toxicity profile. Approval of this regimen is clinically desirable for Japanese patients with ovarian cancer.

Occurence of RAS reversion in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab.

Background: A disappearance of RAS mutations in the plasma of about 50% of mCRCs (metastatic colorectal cancers) treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has been reported. Our aim was to evaluate the same issue at tissue level.Materials and Methods: Using next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR approaches, we characterized the primary tumor (PT) and paired liver metastases in 28 RAS mutant mCRCs. Patients were subdivided into 3 treatment groups: 1) bevacizumab plus chemotherapy; 2) chemotherapy alone; 3) any systemic therapy (control group). In groups 1 and 2, liver metastases were resected after removal of PT and subsequent neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Results: RAS mutant alleles are at the same percentage in PT and liver metastases in the control group, while a significant reduction of the level of RAS mutations was detected in 57.1% of cases in group 1 and in 8.3% of cases in group 2. Differences among groups are statistically significant (p = 0.038).Conclusions: Most of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens experience a strong reduction of RAS mutant cells, suggesting bevacizumab as particularly active against RAS mutant cells. This finding might have potential therapeutic implications, as anti-EGFR could be reconsidered in primarily RAS mutant patients reverted to a wild-type status after bevacizumab exposure.

First-line cetuximab improves the efficacy of subsequent bevacizumab for RAS wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer: an observational retrospective study

The optimal targeted therapy sequence in patients of RAS wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial, and few studies focus on the impact of first-line targeted agents on second-line ones. We enrolled 101 left-sided mCRC patients with RAS wild-type status, of which 50 cases received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in both first-line and second-line therapies (Group A) and 51 cases received first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy followed by second-line bevacizumab-containing regimens (Group B). The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of first-line (PFS 1nd and OS 1nd) and second-line (PFS 2nd and OS 2nd) therapy were compared between the two groups. PFS 1nd was comparable (10.0 vs 10.4 months; p = 0.402), while PFS 2nd (4.6 vs 7.9 months; p = 0.002), OS 1nd (26.8 vs 40.0 months; p = 0.011), and OS 2nd (15.2 vs 22.3 months; p = 0.006) were all poorer in group A compared with group B. Our study in combination with previous clinical data suggest that first-line application of cetuximab may provide a favorable condition for promoting the effect of subsequent bevacizumab, thus representing the optimal targeted therapy sequence in patients of RAS wild-type left-sided mCRC.

Bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: could it be particularly effective in patients with clear cell carcinoma?

Treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is a challenge, particularly for the clear cell (CCC) subtype. However, there is a preclinical rationale that these patients could achieve a benefit from antiangiogenic therapy. To assess this hypothesis, we used the growth modulation index (GMI), which represents an intrapatient comparison of two successive progression-free survival (PFS). We conducted a retrospective real-world study performed on 34 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens from January 2009 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was GMI. An established cut-off > 1.33 was defined as a sign of drug activity. 73.5% of patients had high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and 17.7% had CCC; 70.6% of patients received carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab, and 29.4% received weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab. According to histological subtype, the overall response rate and median PFS were 52% and 14months for HGSOC and 83.3% and 20months for CCC, respectively. The overall population median GMI was 0.99; it was 0.95 and 2.36 for HGSOC and CCC, respectively. CCC subtype was significantly correlated with GMI > 1.33 (odds ratio 41.67; 95% confidence interval 3.6-486.94; p = .03). Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in recurrent CCC is associated with a remarkable benefit in this cohort. The efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in CCC warrants further prospective evaluation.

The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Approach to the Management of Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Approach to the Management of Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

Low Expression of miR-20a-5p Predicts Benefit to Bevacizumab in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated within the TANIA Phase III Trial.

Background: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, no biomarker predicting benefit to a bevacizumab-containing therapy has been established yet. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in angiogenesis and treatment resistance and therefore could be of predictive value. Methods: Profiling of 754 miRNAs was performed in tumor samples of 58 MBC patients treated with a bevacizumab-containing first-line regimen (learning set). Based on progression-free survival (PFS), patients were divided into responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Differentially expressed miRNAs between R and NR were analyzed in a cohort of 57 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy without bevacizumab (control set), to exclude miRNAs providing prognostic information. MiRNA candidates significantly associated with PFS in multivariate analysis were further validated in tumor samples of 203 patients treated within the phase III trial TANIA randomizing between chemotherapy either alone or with bevacizumab after progression on first-line bevacizumab. Results: Low expression of miR-20a-5p (multivariate p = 0.035) and miR-21-5p (multivariate p = 0.004) were significantly associated with longer PFS in the learning set, but not in the control set. In samples from the TANIA trial, low expression of miR-20a-5p was also significantly associated with longer PFS (hazard ration (HR) 0.60; 95%-CI 0.37–0.89; p = 0.012) and longer overall survival (OS; HR 0.54; 95%-CI 0.32–0.83; p = 0.007) in the bevacizumab arm but not in the chemotherapy-only arm (PFS: HR 0.73, p = 0.119; OS: HR 1.01; p = 0.964). For miR-21-5p no significant association with PFS or OS in both treatment arms was observed. Conclusion: MiR-20a-5p expression in breast cancer tissue was predictive for a greater benefit from bevacizumab-containing therapy in two independent cohorts.

Phase I study of BPM31510 and vitamin K in patients with high grade glioma recurrent after a bevacizumab-containing regimen.

2543 Background: BPM31510 is an ubidecarenone-lipid conjugate nanodispersion in clinical development for advanced malignancies, including high grade glioma (HGG). BPM31510’s anti-cancer effect is mediated by induction of mitochondrial superoxide and activation of cell death in glioblastoma models. Herein, we present preliminary pharmaco-kinetic and dynamic data, and survival from a phase I study of BPM31510 + Vitamin K in HGG with progression after bevacizumab (BEV). Methods: This was an open-label phase I study of BPM31510 continuous infusion with Vitamin K (10mg IM qweek) using a mTPI design, starting at 110mg/kg 2X/week, allowing 2 dose escalations &amp; 1 de-escalation. Patients had received ChemoRT and were in recurrence after BEV. Results: Of 12 patients treated with BPM31510, 9 completed the 28-day DLT period. 2 patients came off study for progressive disease; 1 patient after asymptomatic hemorrhage into tumor bed (G1). 10 patients had primary GB, 2 had AA. Median age was 54.5yo (27-67) and KPS 70 (60-90). On Day 1 of BPM31510, a dose dependent increase in Cmax was observed; Tmax values were similar for all doses. AUC was linear with dose escalation. For all doses, Day 4 Cmax values were higher compared to Day 1. In contrast there was variable decrease in Tmax (table). Of evaluable patients, 4 patients received the highest dose 171mg/kg, where a single patient experienced DLT: G3 AST &amp; ALT. The most common grade 1/2 AEs were elevated AST, rash, and fatigue, each occurring in 4 patients. The mOS for 9 eligible/evaluable patients was 128 days (95% CI: 48-209) while PFS was 34 days (95% CI of mean 8.9). Two patients are currently alive &gt;12 months. Conclusions: BPM31510 + vitamin K demonstrated a safe profile to maximum dose of 171mg/kg twice/week with potential therapeutic utility in treatment-refractory HGG patients. Multi-omic molecular profiles characterizing AE and response to be reported from the study will be investigated for next phase of clinical development. Clinical trial information: NCT03020602 . [Table: see text]

Real-world treatment patterns in patients with advanced (stage III-IV) ovarian cancer in the USA and Europe.

Aim: To analyze real-world data relating to treatment decision-making in stage III-IV ovarian cancer (OC). Materials & methods: Real world data were collected from a survey of physicians and their patients (n = 2413) across Europe and the USA in 2017-2018. Results: 49% had stage IVb disease. 39, 54 and 7% of patients received first-line (1L), second-line, or 7% third-line or later treatment. In the 1L (ongoing or completed), 93% received platinum-containing regimens, 26% bevacizumab-containing regimens and 1% a PARP inhibitor-containing regimen. In 1L maintenance treatment, 81% received bevacizumab, 17% platinum-containing treatments and 6% a PARP inhibitor. Conclusion: The most common 1L treatment for advanced ovarian cancer was platinum-containing chemotherapy. Of those receiving 1L maintenance therapy, 70-99% (across countries) received targeted therapy.

Bevacizumab and platinum-based combinations for recurrent ovarian cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

State-of-the art therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer suitable for platinum-based re-treatment includes bevacizumab-containing combinations (eg, bevacizumab combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel or carboplatin-gemcitabine) or the most active non-bevacizumab regimen: carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The aim of this head-to-head trial was to compare a standard bevacizumab-containing regimen versus carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with bevacizumab. This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, was done in 159 academic centres in Germany, France, Australia, Austria, and the UK. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma with first disease recurrence more than 6 months after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients were stratified by platinum-free interval, residual tumour, previous antiangiogenic therapy, and study group language, and were centrally randomly assigned 1:1 using randomly permuted blocks of size two, four, or six to receive six intravenous cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1) plus carboplatin (area under the concentration curve [AUC] 4, day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks or six cycles of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2, day 1) every 4 weeks, both followed by maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both groups) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. There was no masking in this open-label trial. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy data were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01837251. Between Aug 1, 2013, and July 31, 2015, 682 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 345 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-bevacizumab (experimental group) and 337 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin-gemcitabine-bevacizumab (standard group). Median follow-up for progression-free survival at data cutoff (July 10, 2018) was 12·4 months (IQR 8·3-21·7) in the experimental group and 11·3 months (8·0-18·4) in the standard group. Median progression-free survival was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·7-14·2) in the experimental group versus 11·6 months (11·0-12·7) in the standard group (hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·68-0·96; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (88 [27%] of 332 patients in the experimental group vs 67 [20%] of 329 patients in the standard group) and neutropenia (40 [12%] vs 73 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (10%) of 332 patients in the experimental group and 28 (9%) of 329 in the standard group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the experimental group (<1%; large intestine perforation) and two patients in the standard group (1%; one case each of osmotic demyelination syndrome and intracranial haemorrhage). Carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-bevacizumab is a new standard treatment option for platinum-eligible recurrent ovarian cancer. F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Cost-effectiveness of niraparib, rucaparib, and olaparib for treatment of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian carcinoma

BackgroundOlaparib was approved on December 19, 2014 by the US FDA as 4th-line therapy (and beyond) for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations; rucaparib was approved on December 19, 2016 as 3rd-line therapy (and beyond) for germline or somatic BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent disease. On October 23, 2019, niraparib was approved for treatment of women with damaging mutations in BRCA1/2 or other homologous recombination repair genes who had been treated with three or more prior regimens. We compared the cost-effectiveness of PARPi(s) with intravenous regimens for platinum-resistant disease. MethodsMedian progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity data from regulatory trials were incorporated in a model which transitioned patients through response, hematologic complications, non-hematologic complications, progression, and death. Using TreeAge Pro 2017, each PARPi(s) was compared separately to non‑platinum-based and bevacizumab-containing regimens. Costs of IV drugs, managing toxicities, infusions, and supportive care were estimated using 2017 Medicare data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and PFS was reported in quality adjusted life months for platinum-resistant populations. ResultsNon‑platinum-based intravenous chemotherapy was most cost effective ($6,412/PFS-month) compared with bevacizumab-containing regimens ($12,187/PFS-month), niraparib ($18,970/PFS-month), olaparib ($16,327/PFS-month), and rucaparib ($16,637/PFS-month). ICERs for PARPi(s) were 3–3.5× times greater than intravenous non‑platinum-based regimens. ConclusionHigh costs of orally administered PARPi(s) were not mitigated or balanced by costs of infusion and managing toxicities of intravenous regimens typically associated with lower response and shorter median PFS. Balancing modest clinical benefit with costs of novel therapies remains problematic and could widen disparities among those with limited access to care.

Sequential Treatment with Bevacizumab and Aflibercept for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice.

Bevacizumab and aflibercept are currently the mainstay of antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). They are often used in sequence with first- and second-line chemotherapy, especially in patients with RAS-mutated tumours. The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with mCRC treated with the bevacizumab-aflibercept sequence in real-world clinical practice. Data from a national clinical registry of targeted therapies for mCRC were analysed retrospectively. Overall, there were 366 patients with valid data who received first-line treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy followed by aflibercept with chemotherapy. The majority of the patients (n = 296, 80.8%) had RAS mutated tumours. Median cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the bevacizumab-containing regimen to progression on aflibercept was 18.2months (95% CI 16.8-19.5). Median PFS for bevacizumab and aflibercept was 10.6months (95% CI 9.5-11.7) and 5.6months (95% CI 5.1-6.1), respectively. Longer PFS on aflibercept was associated with metachronous metastatic disease and longer PFS on bevacizumab. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line bevacizumab was 32.0months (95% CI 26.6-37.5). The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis was associated with worse OS. Patients treated with aflibercept in real-world clinical practice achieved similar survival outcomes as those treated within randomised trials. Cumulative survival data provide a benchmark for future studies and enable indirect comparisons with other treatment sequences used in mCRC.