Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Research Articles

A Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Drug Therapy in First-line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Systemic therapy is mainly recommended for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Considering the variety of treatments available for HCC, there is a need to understand their relative benefits and risks, especially for the newly approved combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors represented by atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab. A reticulated meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy compared with other first-line systemic therapies for the treatment of patients advanced HCC. PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from the time of library construction to 01 December 2022, and the data were extracted and analyzed using Stata16.0 for Meta-analysis. The data were extracted separately, and a meta-analysis was performed using the software Stata16.0. 16 clinical studies with 8,779 subjects were identified from 13,417 records and were used to build the evidence network for all trials. TThe combination therapy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has the advantage of prolonging the OS of patients when treating advanced HCC [HR=5.71, 95%CI (4.30, 7.12), p<0.05] Also, the combination therapy has the advantage of prolonging the patient's progression free survival [HR=1.60, 95%CI (0.89, 2.49), p<0.05]. Atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy can improve clinical outcomes such as OS and PFS in patients with advanced HCC.

Two cases of severe oral mucositis caused by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Atezolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor specific for the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor. In this case report, we describe two cases of oral mucositis that developed following the initiation of a systemic chemotherapy regimen comprising atezolizumab and bevacizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. After 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, each patient presented with mucosal ulcers in the mouth, oral pain, difficulty in speech and oral intake, and both were admitted to our hospital for management. Following rule out of other conditions such as pharyngeal ulcers, herpetic mucositis, denture or oral trauma, or necrotizing mucositis, both patients were diagnosed with oral mucositis as a severe immune-related adverse event. Oral candidiasis was observed in both cases and should be considered a risk factor for the development of oral mucositis. Chemotherapy was discontinued and treatment with prednisolone was started, along with supportive care. The oral mucositis improved, and prednisolone was gradually reduced; however, in one patient, discontinuation of chemotherapy led to a recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. The other patient was lost to follow-up. In patients with risk factors, attention must be paid to the development of oral mucositis during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing dialysis: a case series.

Three patients aged 79, 75, and 81years with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were treated with a combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The patients, respectively, received their 22nd, 2nd, and 4th treatment cycles, and one achieved long-term stable disease. No serious adverse events, including immune-related adverse events, were observed in any patient. Remarkable progress has been made in chemotherapy for cancer; however, the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in patients undergoing hemodialysis have not been adequately elucidated. This report provides novel insights into the feasibility and outcomes of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with HCC undergoing hemodialysis, highlighting its potential as a viable treatment option with manageable side effects.

Predictive factors for transition to conversion therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma using atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

To identify predictive factors associated with successful transition to conversion therapy following combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In total, 188 patients with HCC, who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy as the first-line chemotherapy, were studied. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) with systemic chemotherapy alone were excluded. Clinical factors possibly linked to successful transition to conversion therapy and the achievement of cancer-free status were identified. Fifteen (8.0%) patients underwent conversion therapy. In the conversion group, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A or B (73.3% versus [vs.] 45.1%; p = .03) and tended to have lower Child-Pugh scores and alpha-fetoprotein levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that BCLC stage was a predictive factor for the implementation of conversion therapy (A or B; odds ratio 3.7 [95% CI: 1.1-13]; p = .04). Furthermore, 10 (66.7%) patients achieved cancer-free status and exhibited a smaller number of intrahepatic lesions at the start of treatment (3.5 vs. 7; p < .01), and a shorter interval between systemic chemotherapy induction and conversion therapy (131 vs. 404 days; p < .01). In addition, the rate of achieving cancer-free status by undergoing surgical resection or ablation therapy was significantly higher (p = .03). BCLC stage was the sole predictive factor for successful transition to conversion therapy when using combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab to treat HCC. Furthermore, a small number of intrahepatic lesions and early transition to conversion therapy were associated with the achievement of cancer-free status.

Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with portal hypertension for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy (Atezo + Beva) is used as the first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). Serious adverse events (AEs), including rupture of esophagogastric varices, have been seen during treatment. Therefore, the relationships of efficacy, safety, and portal hypertension (PH) were analyzed. A total of 146 patients with u-HCC and Child-Pugh Scores of 5-7 received Atezo + Beva. Prophylactic treatment for varices was performed for patients with the risk of rupture of varices before the start of Atezo + Beva. A propensity score-matched cohort was created to minimize the risk of potential confounders. Efficacy was assessed in 41 propensity score-matched pairs. AEs were assessed between patients without PH (n = 80) and with PH (n = 66). In patients without PH and with PH, median overall survival was 18.4 months and 18.8 months (p = 0.71), and median progression-free survival was 8.6 months and 5.8 months (p = 0.92), respectively. On the best radiological response evaluation for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the objective response rate was 31.7% and 26.8% (p = 0.81), respectively. Variceal rupture occurred in three patients with PH, but there were no significant differences in the occurrence of variceal rupture (p = 0.090) and Grade 3-4 AEs between patients without and with PH. No significant differences in efficacy and safety were observed with PH. Prophylactic treatment for varices before the start of Atezo + Beva would allow treatment to continue relatively safely.

Outcome of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy in High-Risk Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Real-world data regarding treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in high-risk patients with advanced HCC are lacking. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, a total of 215 patients with advanced HCC received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment at four tertiary hospitals. High-risk patients were those with grade Vp4 portal vein thrombus, bile duct invasion, or more than 50% liver infiltration. In total, 98 (45.6%) were the high-risk population, 186 (86.5%) were considered to be Child-Pugh class A, and 128 (59.5%) had previously received neoadjuvant or concomitant radiation treatment. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.25 months (95% CI, 9.50-13.10), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.00 months (95% CI, 6.82-9.18). In the high-risk population, the median OS was 10 months (95% CI, 8.19-11.82) and the median PFS was 6.50 months (95% CI, 3.93-9.08). In the high-risk population, multivariate analysis indicated that radiation therapy and lower ALBI grade were associated with better OS and PFS. A total of 177 (82.3%) patients experienced adverse events of any grade, the most common being proteinuria (23.7%). Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment showed consistent efficacy and tolerability in both the total and high-risk population. Radiation therapy combined with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment might be helpful to improve PFS and OS in high-risk populations.

Lenvatinib Versus Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether adding immunotherapy to antiangiogenic therapy benefits patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC) more in the first-line setting remains controversial. In this analysis, we compared the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib monotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy in advanced uHCC in real-world clinical practice. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched on 23 April 2023. The "metaSurvival" and "meta" packages of the R software (version 4.2.2) were used to summarize the survival curves and meta-analyze the survival data. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were defined as dual primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Overall, the pooled median OS was 18.4 months in the lenvatinib group versus 18.5 months in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group; the pooled median PFS was 6.9 months in the lenvatinib group versus 7.3 months in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. Lenvatinib therapy showed similar OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-1.52, p = 0.72] and PFS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56-1.12, p = 0.19) compared with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy. In addition, a comparable ORR [odds ratio (OR): 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.20, p = 0.44) was observed between lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Comprehensive analysis suggested that lenvatinib monotherapy exhibited survival outcomes comparable to those of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy, which may provide useful insights for clinicians in future clinical practice.

Real-world analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab versus FTD/TPI monotherapy.

34 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is a standard of care therapy for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, FTD/TPI in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) was also approved in this setting based on outcomes from the phase 3 SUNLIGHT trial, including statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) compared with FTD/TPI. This study examined demographic/clinical characteristics, treatment duration, OS, and healthcare resource use (HCRU), including outpatient/emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations, among patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI+BEV versus FTD/TPI in a real-world setting. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adults with CRC, who initiated FTD/TPI as monotherapy or in combination with BEV, identified from the Cerner Enviza electronic health records (EHR) database (12/2020–06/2023). A manual chart review of patients’ medical records was conducted where last follow-up was defined as death or last encounter in the EHR. Descriptive statistics were reported for all study variables; Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate OS. Results: Of 197 patients abstracted, 122 (62%) received FTD/TPI+BEV combination therapy and 75 (38%) FTD/TPI monotherapy. Mean age was similar between the FTD/TPI+BEV and FTD/TPI groups (60.2 y vs 61.8 y) and 66% vs 63%, respectively, were male. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 8.9 for the FTD/TPI+BEV group vs 8.5 for the FTD/TPI group and body mass index was 26.9 kg/m2 vs 27.3 kg/m2, respectively. Most patients received treatment in the third or fourth line (65% FTD/TPI+BEV; 75% FTD/TPI). Median follow-up was 5.3 and 4.6 mo, respectively. Mean duration of treatment was 3.7 vs 2.7 mo for FTD/TPI+BEV vs FTD/TPI monotherapy (Table). Median OS (from FTD/TPI initiation to death) was 11.5 and 9.6 mo for FTD/TPI+BEV and FTD/TPI groups (number of deaths: 38 and 22), respectively. Patients receiving FTD/TPI+BEV had numerically more outpatient visits (20.5 vs 13.9), but similar ER visits (0.5 each) and slightly fewer hospitalizations (1.1 vs 1.2) compared with FTD/TPI, during follow-up. Overall HCRU costs were similar between groups (27,175 vs 27,891). Conclusions: This real-world study supports the value of FTD/TPI+BEV combination therapy vs FTD/TPI monotherapy as seen in the SUNLIGHT trial. Patients with FTDTPI+BEV were treated for longer duration with improved OS and no difference in trends for HCRU and associated costs. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who previously received systemic treatment.

495 Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AteBev) has been established as a standard of care for patients with untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib was once the first choice and remains a treatment option for such patients; however, no subsequent treatment to date has proven a similar level of efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AteBev in patients with HCC previously treated with lenvatinib. Methods: In this single-center, open-labeled, single-arm, phase II study, patients with advanced HCC previously treated with at least one systemic treatment were enrolled to receive 1,200 mg of atezolizumab and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate, tumor control rate, and frequency of adverse events. The threshold and expected PFS were 3 months and 6.8 months, respectively, at a one-sided significance level of 0.05, and statistical power of 80%. Based on these data, the number of patients required was estimated to be 26. Results: Among 29 patients enrolled between November 2020 and October 2022, 26 previously treated with lenvatinib were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Median PFS was 9.70 [90% confidence interval (CI), 5.10–14.24] months. Median overall survival was 17.23 (90% CI, 3.18–27.85) months, and response rate and tumor control rate were 34.6% and 69.2%, respectively. Severe adverse events were observed in six patients (23.1%), six patients (23.1%) discontinued treatment because of immune-related adverse events or treatment-refractory ascites, and 10 patients (38.5%) required the withdrawal of treatment mainly because of proteinuria. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: AteBev for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with lenvatinib had a comparable efficacy to that in patients with no prior treatment. It may therefore be a treatment option for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with lenvatinib. Clinical trial information: jRCT1041200068 .

Stem Cell Growth Factor-β as a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Patients with Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

In this retrospective study, we investigated the potential application of serum stem cell growth factor beta (SCGF-β) as a biomarker for predicting the therapeutic response and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) combination therapy. Pre- and post-treatment serum SCGF-β levels were measured and analyzed in relation to treatment outcomes and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment SCGF-β levels were associated with treatment response. Patients with SCGF-β levels exceeding the 163,295 pg/mL cutoff experienced significantly reduced OS, with a median OS of 12.03 months, compared to 28.87 months in those with SCGF-β levels at or below this threshold. These findings suggest that SCGF-β can serve as a predictive marker for clinical outcomes in HCC treatment, highlighting the need for prospective studies to further validate these results and clarify the mechanisms underlying SCGF-β-related therapeutic resistance.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis following pembrolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy for cervical cancer: a case report and systematic review

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab are novel therapeutics used to treat various advanced malignancies. Immune-related adverse events are common, among the most serious of these toxicities is hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), which is a life-threatening disorder of unbridled immune activation but has not been properly established.MethodsWe have procured the first case of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis as an aftermath of treatment with pembrolizumab from the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, China. In a pursuit to enhance the understanding of this condition, a comprehensive systematic review was performed encompassing all reported instances of ICI-associated Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis within the realms of PubMed and Embase databases.ResultsWe detail the recovery of a cervical cancer patient with a history of psoriasis who developed HLH after combined pembrolizumab and bevacizumab treatment. Remarkably, tumor lesions exhibited substantial and sustained regression. From an analysis of 52 identified Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI)-related HLH cases, we discovered that HLH often occurred within the first two treatment cycles and approximately 20% of these patients had a history of autoimmune-related diseases. Despite a 15% mortality rate, the majority of patients experienced positive outcomes. Notably, in instances of recovery from HLH, 80% showed positive tumor outcomes. Even after discontinuation of ICI treatment, tumor control persisted in some cases.ConclusionWe identified the first case of HLH caused by ICI treatment in cervical cancer and summarized the possible occurrence factors of these cases, the treatment outcomes of HLH, and the impact on tumor outcomes.

Complete pathological response after primary tumor surgery following chemoimmunotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery of initially metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction Surgery of the primary tumor following extended course of chemoimmunotherapy has only recently been recognized as a feasible and safe option for selected groups of patients with initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Case outline Here we report a case of a 49-year-old never smoking female patient that was diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Lesions were evident in both lungs and the brain. She underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases and combination therapy of chemotherapy, atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Response to therapy was both remarkable and durable. Ten cycles into treatment MRI of the brain revealed no metastatic lesions. PET/CT revealed a single lesion in the right upper lobe 22x23mm in diameter. The patient underwent a right upper lobectomy. Patohistological evaluation of the specimen revealed complete pathologic response. The patient recovered from surgery and continued chemoimmunotherapy. For four months post-surgery she is disease free and of excellent performance status. Conclusion Primary tumor surgery following extensive chemoimmunotherapy regiment is feasible and could be considered as a treatment option. Further research is warranted to define a patient population that stands to benefit the most from this modality.

Promising Remission with Reduced Bevacizumab and Pembrolizumab Dosage in a Patient with AT-rich Interaction Domain 1A Mutated Ovarian Clear-cell Carcinoma Refractory to Chemotherapy

Abstract Patients with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma have limited treatment choices, because they are resistant to the standard chemotherapeutic agents used in ovarian cancer. The phase II KEYNOTE-100 trial revealed that pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated a 15.8% objective response in patients with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma in the subgroup analysis, which is much higher than that of other histology subtypes of ovarian cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may play a new role in the treatment of these malignancies. Genetic analyses revealed a significant proportion of ovarian clear-cell carcinoma carrying the AT-rich interaction domain 1A protein (ARID1A) mutation. The association between a higher frequency of ARID1A mutation and a higher response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian clear-cell carcinoma opens a new research topic. Herein, we report a patient with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy, who was treated with a reduced dose of bevacizumab and pembrolizumab combination therapy and achieved a complete treatment response.

Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer.

Liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, is a global concern. This study focuses on the evaluation of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab combination therapy as a promising alternative in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The objectives of this systematic review include evaluating the efficacy of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab combination therapy compared to conventional therapies with Sorafenib and other conventional therapies, analyzing the associated adverse effects, and exploring prognostic factors in the setting of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A systematic literature review was carried out using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Fifteen related articles were included and evaluated according to their level of evidence and recommendation. Results: The combination therapy of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab, along with Sorafenib, showed positive results in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Significant adverse effects were identified, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, arterial hypertension, and proteinuria, which require careful attention. In addition, prognostic factors, such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and vascular invasion, were highlighted as key indicators of hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Conclusions: The combination of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab is shown to be effective in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, although it is essential to take into consideration the associated adverse effects. The prognostic factors identified may provide valuable information for the clinical management of this disease. This study provides a comprehensive overview of a promising emerging therapy for liver cancer.

NCOG-06. BEVACIZUMAB ALONE VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A NATIONWIDE POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is no established treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. For the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used either alone or in combination with Irinotecan. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients receiving bevacizumab monotherapy (BEV) and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), using a nationwide population-based dataset. METHODS Patients matching the ICD code C71.x were screened from the national database. From January 2008 to November 2021, 846 patients who had undergone surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 received BEV, while 396 received B+I. The patients' demographic characteristics, inpatient stay duration, prescription frequency, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The median overall survival from initial surgery was 22.60 months (9% CI: 20.50 – 24.21) and 20.44 months (95% CI: 18.55 – 22.60) in the BEV and B+I groups, respectively (p=0.5079, log rank test). The BEV group was older and had a higher percentage of females compared to the B+I group. Younger age, female gender, and having surgery rather than biopsy were associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSION This study found no significant difference in overall survival between bevacizumab alone versus bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy in patients with recurrent GBM. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy may be a suitable treatment option.

NCOG-08. BEVACIZUMAB ALONE VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A NATIONWIDE POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is no established treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. For the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used either alone or in combination with Irinotecan. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients receiving bevacizumab monotherapy (BEV) and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), using a nationwide population-based dataset. METHODS Patients matching the ICD code C71.x were screened from the national database. From January 2008 to November 2021, 846 patients who had undergone surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 received BEV, while 396 received B+I. The patients' demographic characteristics, inpatient stay duration, prescription frequency, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The BEV group was older and had a higher percentage of females compared to the B+I group. The survival analysis revealed no significant difference in survival times between the two groups in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Younger age, female gender, and having surgery rather than biopsy were associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSION This study found no significant difference in overall survival between bevacizumab monotherapy and bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy in patients with recurrent GBM. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy may be a suitable treatment option.

Significance of the autoantibody assay in predicting the development of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) combination therapy is the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). The management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is an important issue associated with achieving a good therapeutic response in patients receiving AB therapy. However, few studies have reported irAE development in patients receiving AB therapy. This study focused on the association between irAE development and autoantibodies at baseline in patients receiving AB therapy. Sixty-one patients receiving AB therapy were enrolled. For autoantibodies, the following antibodies were tested before the start of AB therapy: antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-thyroglobulin antibodies, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, anti-thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibodies, and acetylcholine receptor antibodies. A patient was considered to have pre-existing antibodies if any of the listed antibodies were present at baseline. Ten patients (16%) developed irAEs during the observation period. The irAEs included liver injury, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency, and rhabdomyolysis. Patients with irAE (n=10) were more likely to be positive for any autoantibody (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7, p=0.047) and RF at baseline (HR 5.4, p=0.035) and to achieve complete response (HR 5.8, p=0.027) than those without. The presence of autoantibodies at baseline was an independent factor associated with irAE development. In the real world, 16% of patients receiving AB therapy for u-HCC developed irAEs. Patients with autoantibodies at baseline are at high risk of developing irAEs and require cautious follow-up.

Comparative Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Study.

This study aimed to compare the prognosis and characteristics of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) combination therapy and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). We retrospectively assessed 193 and 114 patients treated with HAIC and AB combination therapy, respectively, between January 2018 and May 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with AB combination therapy was significantly superior to that of patients treated with HAIC (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS). After propensity score matching, our data revealed no significant differences in OS and PFS between patients who received AB combination therapy and those who received HAIC therapy (p = 0.5617 and 0.3522, respectively). In conclusion, our propensity score study reveals no significant differences in OS and PFS between patients treated with AB combination therapy and those treated with HAIC.

Relationship between Plasma IP-10/CXCL10 Levels and the Initial Therapeutic Response in Patients Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy (AB) was the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). IFN-γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) is a chemokine to inhibit HCC proliferation by promoting the migration of cytotoxic T cells. We focused on the relationship between plasma IP-10/CXCL10 levels and the initial therapeutic response in patients receiving AB therapy. Methods: Forty-six patients receiving AB therapy were enrolled. Plasma IP-10/CXCL10 levels were measured at baseline, 3–7 days, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8–12 weeks after the start of AB therapy. The initial therapeutic response was evaluated at 8–12 weeks. Results: The baseline IP-10/CXCL10 levels of partial response (PR) group was higher than that of stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) group. Patients with the baseline IP-10/CXCL10 of 84 pg/mL or higher were likely to present PR than patients below (71 vs. 35%, p = 0.031), but prediction of PD using the baseline IP-10/CXCL10 levels was difficult. In contrast, IP-10/CXCL10 ratio of the PR group was lower than that of the SD/PD group at 3, 6, and 8–12 weeks. Patients with the 3, 6, and 8–12 weeks IP-10/CXCL10 ratio of 1.3, 0.4, and 0.4 or lower were likely to present PR than patients with ≥1.3, 0.4, and 0.4 (88, 35, 35 vs. 30, 3.8, 0%, p < 0.001, 0.011, 0.002). In other hand, the 3, 6, and 8–12 weeks IP-10/CXCL10 ratio for PD group was higher than that for non-PD group. Patients with the 3, 6, and 8–12 weeks IP-10/CXCL10 ratio of 1.3, 1.7, and 1.9 or higher were likely to present PD than patients below (85, 62, 57 vs. 32, 23, 14%, p = 0.002, 0.034, 0.009). Conclusion: High baseline IP-10/CXCL10 levels may be associated with better outcome, and high IP-10/CXCL10 ratio after 3–12 weeks may be associated with worse outcome in u-HCC patients receiving AB therapy.

Relationship between Accurate Diagnosis of Sarcopenia and Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy.

Although there have been advances in the prevention and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years, many HCC patients are still diagnosed with advanced stage. Systemic therapy is indicated for unresectable HCC (uHCC) with major vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic metastases, and the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo/bev) combination is currently recommended as first-line treatment for uHCC. Recently, sarcopenia-related factors, including decreased skeletal muscle index (SMI), have been reportedly associated with prognosis in uHCC patients treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib. There are few reports on muscle strength assessments, including grip strength (GS), despite their importance in accurate sarcopenia diagnosis, and furthermore, there is no evidence regarding atezo/bev therapy. In this study, we investigated whether sarcopenia affects the clinical outcome of atezo/bev therapy. This study included 64 uHCC patients on atezo/bev therapy and assessed their GS and SMI, and SMI was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). We diagnosed sarcopenia based on GS and BIA-SMI and compared the clinical outcomes in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. Of these patients, 28 had sarcopenia, and 36 had non-sarcopenia. Adverse events (AEs) frequently occurred, and the albumin-bilirubin score significantly decreased after atezo/bev therapy in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group. The median progression-free survival was 4.7 (0.4-26.4) and 10.6 (1.1-24.5) months in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 (1.4-27.7) months in the sarcopenia group and was not reached in the non-sarcopenia group, indicating a significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for both groups (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, sarcopenia was significantly associated with OS. In conclusion, sarcopenia was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes based on the occurrence of AEs and decreased liver function in uHCC patients on atezo/bev therapy. GS and SMI are important parameters for accurately diagnosing sarcopenia.