Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Research Articles

Demonstrationof CicatricialStagewith Optical CoherenceTomography in A Child with Best VitelliformMacularDystrophy

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is a rare hereditary macular dystrophy. Various staging systems are performed in the clinical evaluation of BVMD. In this case report, it is aimed to demonstrate the presence of cicatricial stage in a 9-year-old boy. A 9-year-old boy was applied to our Eskisehir YunusEmre State Hospital OphthalmologyClinic with decreased visual acuity in his right eye. When the family history of the patient was questioned, it was learned that the other family members were also followed in another center due to loss of vision. BMVD diagnosis was confirmed by using electrophysiological tests and additional clinical studies. In optical coherence tomography, a hyporeflective lesion consistent with subretinal fluid was observed for both eyes. Additionally, a hump-shaped subretinalhyporeflective lesion was found in the right eye. Visual acuity is generally stable in the early stages of the disease for patients with BVMD, but the presence of a visual impairment is usually thought as a sign of the development of a choroidal neovascular membrane. Although rare, however, cicatricial stage, which is observed in the advanced stages of the disease, can be seen in small children. Distinguishing choroidal neovascular membrane from the cicatricial stage is necessary especially in children due to the risk of amblyopia and to make an accurate treatment planning.

Nationwide epidemiologic survey on incidence of macular dystrophy in Japan.

The aim of this study was to estimate the number of patients in Japan who had visited an ophthalmologist for macular dystrophy of various types, including Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), Stargardt disease, occult macular dystrophy (OMD), cone (-rod) dystrophy, X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS), and central areolar choroid dystrophy (CACD). Nationwide epidemiologic survey METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to 965 major facilities, including all the university hospitals in Japan. The aim of the questionnaire was to determine the number of patients with each type of macular dystrophy who had visited an outpatient clinic during the past 5 years (January 2015 to December 2019). Over 70% of the patients were diagnosed and followed up at university hospitals. The estimated annual number of newly diagnosed cases was as follows: 55.3 for BVMD, 36.7 for Stargardt disease, 35.8 for OMD, 160.6 for cone (-rod) dystrophy, 31.0 for XLRS, 29.8 for CACD, and 174.1 for other types of macular dystrophy. The total number of patients with macular dystrophy diagnosed and followed at major institutions was estimated to be 6651. This was the first nationwide survey of macular dystrophy in Japan and provided an approximate number of affected patients. The diagnosis of macular dystrophy is primarily carried out at facilities with affiliated specialists, such as university hospitals. By examining the incidence of multiple diseases simultaneously, we were able to compare the incidence of each type of macular dystrophy.

BEST1 Variant Associated with an Atypical Macular and Peripheral Retinal Phenotype.

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is an inherited macular dystrophy associated with over 250 pathogenic variants of the Bestrophin-1 (BEST1) gene. While several of the types of lesions of BVMD are well-described, reports of phenotypic variations associated with rare genetic variants are limited. Retrospective case-series performed in 2021 at a tertiary eye care center. Three members of one family referred to a tertiary eye care clinic for evaluation of their autosomal dominant macular dystrophy. Study subjects presented with atypical findings of peripheral schisis-like lesions and atrophy with abnormal electroretinogram (ERG) in addition to typical macular lesions found in BVMD. Genetic analyses identified a heterozygous BEST1 c.227T>A, p.(Ile76Asn) pathogenic variant in all three subjects. This study represents the first report of the phenotype associated with the c.227T>A, p.(Ile76Asn) BEST1 variant, which - while mentioned twice in the literature - has not been previously described. The phenotype is unique, comprising features of typical BVMD with ERG and peripheral findings, suggestive of a panretinal dysfunction.

Fixation Location and Stability in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

To analyze fixation location and stability in best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and test their association with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Observational, cross-sectional study. Thirty patients (55 eyes) affected by genetically confirmed BVMD were followed up at the Retinal Heredodystrophies Unit of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan. Patients underwent testing with macular integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimeter. Fixation location was measured as distance in degrees (°) between preferred retinal locus (PRL) and estimated fovea location (EFL); fixation was defined as eccentric when the distance between PRL and EFL exceeded 2°. Fixation stability was graded as stable, relatively unstable, or unstable and expressed as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA, °2). Fixation location and stability. The median distance of the PRL from the anatomic fovea was 0.7°, and fixation location was eccentric in 27% of eyes. Fixation was graded as stable in 64% of eyes, relatively unstable in 13%, and unstable in 24%, with a median 95% BCEA of 6.2°2. The atrophic/fibrotic stage was associated with worse fixation parameters (all P<0.01). Both PRL eccentricity and fixation stability were linearly associated with BCVA: every 1° increase in PRL eccentricity was associated with a 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) worse BCVA (P<0.0001) while every 1°2 increase in 95% BCEA was associated with a 0.01 logMAR worse BCVA (P<0.001). No significant intereye correlation was found for PRL eccentricity and fixation stability, as well as no association between the patient's age and fixation parameters. We demonstrated that most eyes affected by BVMD retain a central stable fixation and provided evidence that both fixation eccentricity and stability are strongly associated with visual acuity in BVMD. These parameters may serve as secondary end points for future clinical trials. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

The pseudohypopyon stage in adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy.

To gain insight into the pathogenesis of adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AFVD) via assessment of its pseudohypopyon stage (PHS). Retrospectively, data were collected in a tertiary center from established cohorts of a genetically evaluated AFVD and best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) eyes in the pseudohypopyon stage. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, LogMAR), lesion characterization, including lesion dimensions, liquefaction areas and patterns (altitudinal or lateral), and ellipsoid zone integrity were analyzed from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images. Out of 167 eyes of 90 AFVD patients and 56 eyes of 28 BVMD patients, 8 eyes of six AFVD patients and five eyes of four BVMD patients were at the PHS were included. The mean LogMAR BCVA ± SD was 0.21 ± 0.20 and 0.41 ± 0.10 in AFVD and BVMD diseases, respectively (p = 0.13). Seven AFVD eyes (87.5%) demonstrated lateral liquefaction, while all BVMD eyes demonstrated an altitudinal pattern (p = 0.005). Maximal horizontal lesion diameters were 1.41 ± 0.46mm and 2.64 ± 0.77mm in AFVD and BVMD, respectively (p = 0.02). AFVD patients were older (69 ± 14) than BVMD patients (22 ± 13; p = 0.009). The pseudohypopyon stage in AFVD is often characterized by a lateral liquefaction pattern, unlike the altitudinal pattern characterizing BVMD. Age, lesion size, or pathogenesis pathways may underline the different pseudohypopyon stage patterns in AFVD and BVMD.

Multimodal imaging in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy: Literature review and novel insights.

Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) is a dominantly inherited retinal disease caused by dominant variants in the BEST1 gene. The original classification of BVMD is based on biomicroscopy and color fundus photography (CFP); however, advancements in retinal imaging provided unique structural, vascular, and functional data and novel insights on disease pathogenesis. Quantitative fundus autofluorescence studies informed us that lipofuscin accumulation, the hallmark of BVMD, is unlikely to be a primary effect of the genetic defect. It could be due to a lack of apposition between photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium in the macula with subsequent accumulation of shed outer segments over time. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and adaptive optics imaging revealed that vitelliform lesions are characterized by progressive changes in the cone mosaic corresponding to a thinning of the outer nuclear layer and then disruption of the ellipsoid zone, which are associated with a decreased sensitivity and visual acuity. Therefore, an OCT staging system based on lesion composition, thus reflecting disease evolution, has been recently developed. Lastly, the emerging role of OCT Angiography proved a greater prevalence of macular neovascularization, the majority of which are non-exudative and develop in late disease stages. In conclusion, effective diagnosis, staging, and clinical management of BVMD will likely require a deep understanding of the multimodal imaging features of this disease.

Clinical presentation and outcomes of trivial trauma-associated giant macular holes in children with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy

We present three cases of children with giant macular holes in relation to trivial trauma. These children had brittle retina secondary to Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) which made them vulnerable to the irreversible complications. None of the three cases had any signs of trauma in the anterior segment pointing to trivial nature of the trauma. Two cases progressed to retinal detachment. This series highlights the importance of ocular protection and special care needed for children with BVMD.

Elaborate Evaluation of Farnsworth Dichotomous D-15 Panel Test Can Help Differentiate between Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy and Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy

Introduction: The colour vision in bestrophinopathies has not been assessed in detail so far. The aim of this study was to explore the extent to which distinct types of bestrophinopathies differ in regard to colour vision deficiencies using Farnsworth Dichotomous D-15 and Lanthony Desaturated D-15 panel tests. Methods: Both D-15 tests were performed in 52 eyes of 26 patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and 10 eyes of 5 patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). Two methods were used for a quantitative assessment of the colour vision deficiencies: moment of inertia method and Bowman method. The following parameters were calculated: confusion angle, confusion index (C-index), selectivity index (S-index), total error score (TES), and colour confusion index (CCI). Results: The median value of confusion angle for all stages of BVMD fell into a narrow range around 62, indicating normal results. The median confusion angle value was 57 in ARB patients within a very wide range down to −82, indicating non-specific deficits. These differences were statistically significant. Significantly abnormal C-index and CCI values were found only in ARB patients, being 2.0 and 1.49, respectively. The majority of parameters of D-15 tests were independent of the visual acuity in both bestrophinopathies. Conclusions: Elaborate evaluation of the D-15 panel tests might help establish a differential diagnosis between different bestrophinopathies, as the pattern of the colour vision loss is different between BVMD and ARB. The quantitative parameters of colour vision tests in bestrophinopathies are independent of the visual acuity.

Choroidal Neovascularization Is Common in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy and Plays a Role in Vitelliform Lesion Evolution

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is usually considered to be a late-stage complication in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and can be difficult to diagnose with fluorescein angiography. This study used swept-source (SS) OCT angiography (OCTA) to evaluate the prevalence of CNV in BVMD, identify structural features associated with CNV, and provide insight into the role of CNV in vitelliform lesion evolution. Institutional review board-approved, retrospective, cross-sectional, and longitudinal study. Patients with molecularly confirmed BVMD. Charts from consecutive patients with BVMD imaged with SS-OCTA (PLEX Elite 9000, Carl-Zeiss Meditec Inc) at the University of Iowa from September 2017 to October 2021 were reviewed. Clinical data, including age, gender, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were recorded. The presence of CNV on SS-OCTA was determined by expert graders and correlated with structural features, such as interstitial fluid, subretinal fluid, nodular subretinal pillar, focal choroidal excavation (FCE), and subfoveal choroidal thickness, with a P value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Presence of CNV on SS-OCTA and correlation with structural features on SS-OCT. A total of 53 eyes from 27 patients (13 women; 48.1%) were included. The mean age was 45 years (range, 8-79 years), and the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA was 0.38 (range, 0-1). Choroidal neovascularization was identified on SS-OCTA in 27 eyes (50.9%), of which 63.0% had a vitelliform (Gass stage 2) lesion. In 40.7% (11 of 27) of eyes, there was no prior clinical diagnosis of CNV. Other structural features associated with CNV included FCEs (15.1%, 8 of 53 eyes) and nodular pillars (15.1%, 8 of 53 eyes) (P < 0.01). Seven patients had available longitudinal imaging, and most of these patients had CNV visible on SS-OCTA (71.4%; 10 of 14 eyes). Choroidal neovascularization is common in BVMD, including in the early stages of the disease. The presence of FCEs or nodular pillars should heighten the clinical suspicion of CNV, which may accelerate vitelliform lesion evolution. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Clinical Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers and Retinal Sensitivity in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

PurposeTo investigate the clinical and imaging features associated with retinal sensitivity in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, single-center, observational study. Each patient underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT), near-infrared fundus autofluorescence, and OCT angiography. Macular integrity assessment microperimetry under mesopic conditions was performed to obtain retinal sensitivity thresholds from 68 testing points in the central macula. Structural OCT was used to classify BVMD lesions into four types according to their composition: vitelliform, mixed, subretinal fluid, and atrophy. Multilevel, mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine the factors associated with retinal sensitivity.ResultsThe study included 57 eyes of 30 patients with BVMD, 48 of which (84%) were in a clinical stage. Mean retinal sensitivity varied according to the composition of the lesion: the vitelliform type registering the highest (22 ± 4.1 dB), followed by mixed (18.73 ± 2.7 dB), subretinal fluid (15.68 ± 4.2 dB), and atrophy types (11.85 ± 4.6 dB). The factors most strongly associated with mean retinal sensitivity in BVMD proved to be the OCT lesion type and outer nuclear layer thickness.ConclusionsRetinal sensitivity in BVMD is influenced by lesion composition and outer nuclear layer thickness. Further studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to examine retinal sensitivity over time and to validate retinal sensitivity changes as biomarkers for BVMD.Translational RelevanceAssessing retinal sensitivity in BVMD provides a new instrument in the clinical characterization of the disease and offers the opportunity to identify imaging biomarkers for use as outcome measures in future clinical trials.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Choroidal Structural Analysis and Vascularity Index in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

This study investigated choroidal structural changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) using choroidal vascularity index (CVI) and choroidal thickness (CT) in patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). This retrospective case control study included 78 patients with BVMD of different clinical stages and 242 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Subfoveal OCT scans were analysed. Total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA) and CT were measured after image segmentation and binarization. CVI, a novel marker for choroidal angioarchitecture, was defined as the ratio of LA to TCA. CVI and CT were compared between BVMD and control group, as well as among the BVMD subgroups. Mean CVI was lower in eyes with BVMD (65.0 ± 3.5%) compared to that in control eyes (67.5 ± 3.9%) and this was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in subfoveal CT between BVMD (302.88 ± 81.68μm) and control (309.31 ± 65.46μm) eyes (p = 0.4799). In the subgroup analysis, all stages of BVMD showed lower CVI compared to control while SFCT remained similar. Within the BVMD subgroups, CVI and subfoveal CT did not differ significantly and both were not shown to be associated with visual acuity. Decreased CVI was shown in eyes with BVMD compared to control eyes, while no significant difference in subfoveal CT was seen. CVI may be helpful in the understanding of choroidal pathology in BVMD.

Genetic and clinical features of BEST1-associated retinopathy based on 59 Chinese families and database comparisons

Variants in BEST1 are one of the most common cause of retinopathy mainly involving the retinal pigment epithelium with both dominant and recessive traits. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of potential pathogenic variants (PPVs) in BEST1 and their associated clinical features. Variants in BEST1 were collected from our in-house exome sequencing data and systematically evaluated by in silico prediction tools as well as genotype-phenotype analysis. The pathogenicity features of the BEST1 variants were further assessed through database comparison among the in-house data, Genome Aggregation Database from the general population, and all previously published literature. The clinical information of the in-house patients was summarized. The PPVs in BEST1 were identified in 66 patients from 59 families, including 32 families with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and 27 families with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). These PPVs included 31 missense variants, seven truncation variants, one in-frame deletion, and a known 3-untranslated region variant. All the truncations detected in our study were exclusively involved in ARB but not BVMD. Among the 31 missense variants, 18 missenses associated with BVMD in the dominant trait were clustered in four hotspot regions with statistically significant differences from the recessive missenses. Except for distinct macular changes, there were no statistically significant differences among the other associated clinical features between BVMD and ARB, including peripheral retinopathy, high hyperopia, and angle-closure glaucoma. In conclusion, BEST1-associated dominant retinopathy was preferentially caused by missense variants located in important functional regions. Truncations were most likely benign in heterozygous status. Future studies are expected to elucidate the mystery of the same missense variants contributing to both BVMD and ARB.

Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)

Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of critical VA loss. Currently, differential diagnosis requires an invasive and time-consuming process including genetic testing, electrooculography (EOG), full field electroretinogram (ERG), and visual field testing. The aim of our study was to automatically classify OCT and BAF images from stage II BVMD and AVMD eyes using a deep learning algorithm and to identify an image processing method to facilitate human-based clinical diagnosis based on non-invasive tests like BAF and OCT without the use of machine-learning technology. After the application of a customized image processing method, OCT images were characterized by a dark appearance of the vitelliform deposit in the case of BVMD and a lighter inhomogeneous appearance in the case of AVMD. By contrast, a customized method for processing of BAF images revealed that BVMD and AVMD were characterized respectively by the presence or absence of a hypo-autofluorescent region of retina encircling the central hyperautofluorescent foveal lesion. The human-based evaluation of both BAF and OCT images showed significantly higher correspondence to ground truth reference when performed on processed images. The deep learning classifiers based on BAF and OCT images showed around 90% accuracy of classification with both processed and unprocessed images, which was significantly higher than human performance on both processed and unprocessed images. The ability to differentiate between the two entities without recurring to invasive and expensive tests may offer a valuable clinical tool in the management of the two diseases.

Impaired Bestrophin Channel Activity in an iPSC-RPE Model of Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) from an Early Onset Patient Carrying the P77S Dominant Mutation.

Best Vitelliform Macular dystrophy (BVMD) is the most prevalent of the distinctive retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene. This gene, which encodes for a homopentameric calcium-activated ion channel, is crucial for the homeostasis and function of the retinal pigment epithelia (RPE), the cell type responsible for recycling the visual pigments generated by photoreceptor cells. In BVMD patients, mutations in this gene induce functional problems in the RPE cell layer with an accumulation of lipofucsin that evolves into cell death and loss of sight. In this work, we employ iPSC-RPE cells derived from a patient with the p.Pro77Ser dominant mutation to determine the correlation between this variant and the ocular phenotype. To this purpose, gene and protein expression and localization are evaluated in iPSC-RPE cells along with functional assays like phagocytosis and anion channel activity. Our cell model shows no differences in gene expression, protein expression/localization, or phagocytosis capacity, but presents an increased chloride entrance, indicating that the p.Pro77Ser variant might be a gain-of-function mutation. We hypothesize that this variant disturbs the neck region of the BEST1 channel, affecting channel function but maintaining cell homeostasis in the short term. This data shed new light on the different phenotypes of dominant mutations in BEST1, and emphasize the importance of understanding its molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, the data widen the knowledge of this pathology and open the door for a better diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.

Novel mutations in the BEST1 gene cause distinct retinopathies in two Chinese families.

To describe the clinical heterogeneity of patients with novel mutations in BEST1. All the members in the two Chinese families underwent detailed clinical evaluations including best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, applanation tonometry, and dilated fundus examination. Fundus autofluorescence, fundus fluorescein angiography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, electrooculography, and electroretinogram were also performed. Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood for all the participants. The targeted next-generation sequencing of inherited retinal disease-associated genes was conducted to identify the causative mutation. A novel BEST1 missense mutation c.41T>C (p.Leu14Ser) was identified in Family 1. It was co-segregated with the phenotype of best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and bioinformatics analysis confirmed it was harmful. Another novel BEST1 frameshift mutation c.345_346insGGCAAGGACG (p.Glu119Glyfs*116) and a novel USH2A missense mutation c.12560G>A, p.Arg4187His were identified in family 2 with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), which might interact and lead to the phenotype of RP. Two novel mutations in the BEST1 gene in two unrelated families with distinct phenotypes and BEST1 mutation accompanied with USH2A mutation would result in RP, which could be enormously helpful in understanding the pathogenesis of the inherited retinal disease caused by a BEST1 mutation.

Choroidal Neovascularization Associated with Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.

Objectives:The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings of patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).Methods:Six eyes that were diagnosed with CNV associated with BVMD were evaluated retrospectively. A standard ophthalmologic examination, a fundus fluorescein angiography (FA), and the OCT findings of the patients were examined. Anatomical and functional changes seen after treatment were evaluated.Results:One (16%) of the cases was female and five (83%) were male. The mean age was calculated as 36.3±24.9 years (range 11–73 years). The mean follow-up period of the cases after detecting CNV was determined as 26 months (range 6–168 months). Best corrected visual acuities were 0.65±0.39 logMAR (1.0–0.2 logMAR) when CNV was detected and 0.42±0.25 logMAR (limits 0.7–0.2 logMAR) at the end of the follow-up. Photodynamic therapy was applied to one (17%) of the cases, and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment was applied to the others (83%). The mean number of intravitreal injections was found to be 3±1.37 (range 2–4).In all cases, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), external limiting membrane, and irregularities in inner retinal layers were observed in the initial OCT examinations. In all cases, it was observed that the IRF regressed with treatment and SRF continued in five eyes. Hypertrophic outer retinal scarring developed in all cases.Conclusion:In cases with CNV due to BVMD, regression in CNV activity was achieved with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection treatment. The IRF is a marker that can be used both in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of CNV associated with BVMD.

Correlation of features on OCT with visual acuity and Gass lesion type in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy

ObjectiveTo correlate structural features seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and Gass lesion type in patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).Methods and analysisThis is...

Clinical findings in eyes with BEST1-related retinopathy complicated by choroidal neovascularization.

To determine the characteristics of eyes diagnosed with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) complicated by choroidal neovascularization (CNV). This was a retrospective, multicenter observational case series. Fourteen genetically confirmed BVMD patients and 9 ARB patients who had been examined in 2 ophthalmological institutions in Japan were studied. The findings in a series of ophthalmic examinations including B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed. CNV was identified in 5 eyes (17.9%) of BVMD patients and in 2 eyes (11.1%) of ARB patients. Three of 5 eyes with BVMD were classified as being at the vitelliruptive stage and 2 eyes at the atrophic stage. The CNV in 2 BVMD eyes were diagnosed as exudative because of acute visual acuity reduction, retinal hemorrhage, and intraretinal fluid, while the CNV in 3 BVMD eyes and 2 ARB eyes were diagnosed as non-exudative. The visual acuity of the two eyes with exudative CNV did not improve despite anti-VEGF treatments. None of the eyes with non-exudative CNV had a reduction of their visual acuity for at least 4years. All of the CNV were located within hyperreflective materials which were detected in 16 eyes (57.1%) of the BVMD eyes and in 7 eyes (38.9%) of the ARB eyes. CNV is a relatively common complication in BEST1-related retinopathy in Asian population as well. The prognosis of eyes with exudative CNV is not always good, and OCTA can detect CNV in eyes possessing hyperreflective materials.

New Evidence on BEST1 Genetic Variant Identified in a Patient with Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Phenotype

Best Disease (BD), also known as Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD), represents an inherited autosomal dominant macular dystrophy with a juvenile age of onset [1]. It is a phenotypically heterogeneous, bilateral condition that affects the retina and Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) caused by pathogenic variants in the BEST1 gene located on chromosome 11q12-13 [2,3]. Typical fundus findings in BD are egg yolk-like, round or oval, lesions seen in the macula, and affected eyes may demonstrate various clinical stages, ranging from the previtelliform stage to Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) [4]. The macular appearance in all stages is deceptive, as most patients maintain relatively good visual acuity throughout the course of the disease. Patients commonly experience visual compromise in early adulthood, although the age of onset can range from childhood to late adulthood [3] and most patients with BD maintain good vision in at least one eye. The presence of subretinal fluid or CNV has been associated with a poorer visual prognosis [4]. In this case report, we describe a patient with clinical features suggestive of Best disease. We discuss the differential diagnosis and we present the multimodal imaging of the retina used for both the diagnosis and follow up. We also report a genetic study that demonstrates more evidence on a novel genetic variant in the BEST1 gene. The same genetic mutation has been recently reported as a novel variant in a single patient with BVMD [5].

Disease expression caused by different variants in the BEST1 gene: genotype and phenotype findings in bestrophinopathies.

Purpose:To analyse the spectrum of clinical features and molecular genetic data in a series of patients carrying likely disease-associated variants in the BEST1 gene.Methods:Retrospective observational analysis of clinical data extracted from the medical records of visual function, multimodal imaging and electrophysiology of 62 eyes of 31 patients. Molecular genetic analysis was performed by means of panel-based NGS or Sanger sequencing.Results:The spectrum of variants in the BEST1 gene comprised 19 different variants and three of which are novel. Fundus photographs and OCT images allowed categorization of 52 eyes as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) with stages 1 to 5 and 10 eyes with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), with more severe phenotype. One patient was shown to be heterozygous for a variant, which has so far been described only in ARB, but this patient had the BVMD phenotype. There was no significant progression of the visual acuity during the follow-up period of 5 years both in BVMD and ARB. The most prevalent pattern of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in BVMD was ‘patchy’. There were diverse visual field defects in static automated perimetry (SAP) depending on the stage. The Arden ratio was significantly lower in ARB patients and in eyes with stage 5 of BVMD.Conclusions:The genotype does not always predict the phenotype in patients with BVMD and ARB; however, having two mutations in the BEST1 gene causes a more severephenotype. FAFhelped to distinguish ARB from BVMD. Most of the observed eyesdidnotprogressfunctionallyduringthefollow-up.ARBandtheatrophicstageof BVMD as the disease end-stage had the worst visual functions and EOG results.