significance of the painting. It is Does formal art training educate the the point at which the scanning eye by enabling the viewer to carry out the pattern settles down on an average type of in-depth analysis of the compositiol path after initially traversing a varielements called for in Berlyne's theory? Do able number of more-or-less ranferences in visual exploration contribute to aesthetic judgment? To answer these ques dom paths largely determined by tions, the present study compares visual pictorial features. According to exploration patterns of art-trained and Molnar, the viewing of good comuntrained viewers who judged composition positions reaches equilibrium after that differed in balance through manipulati( of symmetrical organization. fewer transitions than does the viewing of bad compositions, which he demonstrates by comparing transition-probability matricies from Manet's Olympia with Titian's Sacred Love and Earthly Love. An important implication of this finding is that the aesthetic qualities of a visual composition are more likely to be sought during early scanning, presumably to satisfy diversive exploratory aims; late scanning is more likely to occur to satisfy cognitive curiosity, a specific exploration aim. Molnar's approach has great promise, and the present study uses it as a point of departure. Berlyne's theory of psychoaesthetics has been used by Molnar to provide a theoretical framework for relating perceptual analysis to aesthetic judgment. According to the theory, the viewer's aesthetic response to an artwork is closely tied to perceptual exploration. Berlyne distinguishes between two types of exploratory behavior: diversive and specific. Diversive exploratory behavior occurs in order to seek out stimulation, regardless of the content or source, that has appealing collative properties [8]. Specific exploratory behavior occurs when a state of perceptual or epistemic curiosity is aroused in the viewer by uncertainty about, or incomplete perception of, information content. The two types of exploratory behavior are reflected by the clustering or lack of clustering of eye fixations on pictorial features as a viewer scans it. Widely dispersed, sparsely populated clusters C. F. Nodine (perceptual psychologist), University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Pendergrass Diagnostic Research Laboratory, 308 Medical Education Building, 36th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6086, U.S.A. PJ. Locher (experimental psychologist), Montclair State College, Department of Psychology, Upper Montclair, NJ 07043, U.S.A. E.A. Krupinski (vision researcher), University of Arizona, Department of Radiology, Tucson, AZ 85724, U.S.A. Received 22January 1991. LEONARDO, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 2219-227,1993 n
Read full abstract