Benefits Of Statins Research Articles

Abstract 4137922: Cardiovascular Prognosis of Statin Users Developing Diabetes in Secondary Prevention: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Background: In primary prevention, statin use with new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) was associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. In high-risk and secondary prevention settings, the cardiovascular prognosis of statin users progressing to new-onset DM remains unclear. Methods: We collected data from inpatients with or without baseline ASCVD from four medical centers affiliated to Qingdao University. Patients were categorized into 4 phenotypes: (1) statin non-users without diabetes; (2) statin users with incident diabetes; (3) statin users with pre-existing diabetes; and (4) statin users without diabetes. The primary outcome was ASCVD events. The stratified Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate the association between the four distinct phenotypes and the risk of ASCVD. Results: Among 12,800 high-risk patients, over a median follow-up of 118 days (interquartile range, 48-379 days), 1447 ASCVD events were documented. Compared with statin non-users without diabetes, statin users without diabetes (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.77 [0.65, 0.91], P=0.001) and statin users with pre-existing diabetes (0.80 [0.66, 0.99], P=0.035) were associated with lower risk of ASCVD, whereas statin users with new-onset diabetes were not (0.91 [0.70, 1.19], P=0.50), overall P for trend =0.013.( Figure 1 ) In patients with baseline ASCVD (i.e., secondary prevention settings), we observed similar findings ( Figure 2 ) Conclusions: In high-risk patients with pre-existing ASCVD, new-onset diabetes after statin use was likely associated with compromised cardiovascular benefits of statins.

Abstract 4116340: The Effect of Periprocedural Statin Therapy on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) stands as a notable alternative to surgery for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite the established benefits of statins in cardiovascular pathologies, their specific impact in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR remains uncertain. Our study aims to assess whether perioperative statin use improves survival and outcomes post-TAVR. Methods: A search was conducted across various databases to retrieve studies comparing perioperative statin use versus no statin use in patients undergoing TAVR. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes included stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular complications, and in-hospital mortality. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (v. 3) was used to pool odds ratio (OR) under a random-effects model, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Our analysis encompassing 20663 patients from 15 observational studies found that perioperative statin use was associated with a significant reduction in ACM (OR= 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61-0.83, I 2 = 50.3%, p<0.001). Although not statistically significant, perioperative statin use demonstrated a trend towards a decreased risk of stroke (OR= 0.90, 95% CI: 0.68-1.19, I 2 = 0%, p= 0.455), AKI (OR= 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.31, I 2 = 49%, p= 0.968), and 30-day mortality (OR= 0.71, 95% CI: 0.46-1.10, I 2 = 0%, p= 0.126), and no difference was seen in the risk of MI (OR= 1.72, 95% CI: 0.73-4.04, I 2 = 0%, p= 0.214), cardiovascular complications (OR= 1.12, 95% CI: 0.91-1.37, I 2 = 0%, p= 0.297), and in-hospital mortality (OR= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.13-1.38, I 2 = 65.8%, p= 0.151) (Figure 1 and 2). Conclusion: Perioperative statin therapy reduces all-cause mortality in TAVR patients but shows limited impact on other outcomes. Further large-scale prospective studies and trials are necessary to corroborate our findings.

The long-term clinical impact of high-intensity statin therapy in older patients with acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Introduction Despite substantial clinical evidence supporting the benefits of high-intensity statins for acute myocardial infarction, the clinical implications of their use in elderly populations have yet to be fully elucidated. Purpose This study aims to clarify the importance of high-intensity statin therapy at discharge for patients aged over 65 with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods In this retrospective cohort analysis conducted with data from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR), we evaluated 4,147 patients aged 65 and above who experienced acute myocardial infarction (AMI), underwent coronary interventions utilizing second-generation drug-eluting stents, and were prescribed statins at the time of discharge. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 3 years, defined as the composite of all-cause deaths, any myocardial infarction, and any coronary revascularization. The secondary outcome was target-lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite endpoint of all cardiac deaths, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 3 years. Results In this study, 1,268 patients (30.5%) were treated with high-intensity statins at discharge. The patients were stratified into two groups using an age threshold of 78 years. In the propensity-matched cohort aged 65 to 78, the use of high-intensity statins was associated with a significant reduction in MACE (19.1% versus 14.5%, p=0.011). In the propensity score-matched cohort aged over 78, however, treatment with high-intensity statins did not lead to a reduction in MACE (24.8% versus 24.5%, p>0.99). Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that high-intensity statin therapy was associated with a reduced risk of MACE (HR 0.69, 95% CI [0.57-0.85], p<0.001) in patients aged 65 to 78. However, the effects of high-intensity statins on TLF were not significant in matched patients aged 65 to 78 (7.9% versus 6.5%, p=0.269) and in those aged over 78 (13.7% versus 12.1%, p=0.638). Conclusion This extensive, nationwide cohort study suggests that treatment with high-intensity statins upon discharge may not offer clinical benefits in reducing MACE and TLF in patients with AMI aged over 78, compared to those aged 65 to 78.

Publication bias in pharmacogenetics of statin-associated muscle symptoms, an umbrella review with a meta-epidemiological study

Background and aimsStatin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are a major cause of treatment discontinuation. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) recommend dose adjustment for statin treatment according to known SLCO1B1 genotype to reduce SAMS. We hypothesized that the association between SLCO1B1 genotype and SAMS is misestimated because of publication bias. MethodsWe searched published systematic reviews on the association between SLCO1B1 genotype and SAMS. To assessed publication bias, we used funnel plot visual inspection, Egger’s test, and the Bayes Factor (BFPublication-bias) from Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis (RoBMA). We compared the odds ratios (ORUncorrected) from meta-analyses before and after correcting for publication bias using trim-and-fill (ORTrim&Fill) and RoBMA (ORRoBMA) methods. ResultsWe included 8 cohort and 11 case-control studies, totaling 62 OR of three SLCO1B1 genotypes and six statin drugs. In the primary analysis, the funnel plot was suggestive of publication bias, confirmed by Egger’s test (p=0.001) and RoBMA (BFPublication-bias=18). Correcting the estimate for publication bias resulted in loss of the association, from a significant ORUncorrected (1.31 95%CI [1.13–1.53]) to corrected ORs suggesting no difference: ORTrim&Fill (1.07 95%CI [0.89–1.30]) and ORRoBMA (1.02 95%CI [1.00–1.33]). This suggested that publication bias overestimated the association by 18% and 23%, respectively. Similar results were found for genotype rs4149056, simvastatin and atorvastatin. ConclusionsThe effect of the SLCO1B1 genotype on the risk of developing SAMS is overestimated in the published literature, especially rs4149056. This could lead prescribers to incorrectly decreasing statin doses or even avoiding statin use, leading to a loss of the potential cardiovascular benefit of statins.

Optimization of Hypercholesterolemia Treatment after Heart Transplant: The Role of PCSK9 Inhibitors.

Previous studies have reported the benefit of statins after heart transplant (HT). However, the use of high-dose statins might be limited in some HT patients due to intolerance and interactions with immunosuppression or might not be enough to achieve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goals. Hyperlipidemia has been associated with coronary allograft vasculopathy. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors might be a safe and effective option in HT patients with suboptimal lipid control. In a retrospective study, we identified HT patients in our center with LDL cholesterol >100 mg/dL, after diet modifications and up-titration of statins to maximum tolerated dose, treated with PCSK9i. The primary endpoint was LDL reduction one month after, and secondary endpoints were the development of donorspecific HLA antibodies (DSA) and the presence of coronary allograft vasculopathy or rejection. From January, 2018, to January, 2024, we identified five HT patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. In all cases, evolocumab was used. A significant reduction in LDL cholesterol was observed (151.6 ± 13.5 mg/dl to 72.4 ± 14.6 mg/dl; p = 0.04, mean reduction 75.7 ± 14.1 mg/dl), as well as in total cholesterol (231 ± 34.6 mg/dl to 152.2 ± 38.9 mg/dl; p < 0.01, mean reduction 78.8 ± 22.2 mg/dl). A significant increase in HDL cholesterol was not observed (45.4 ± 10.9 mg/dl to 46.2 ± 11.1 mg/dl; p = 0.60). One patient developed DSA five years after treatment onset. Rejection and coronary allograft vasculopathy were not observed. PCSK9 inhibitors are safe and effective in reducing LDL in HT patients. However, larger studies are needed to clarify if they can reduce the development of coronary allograft vasculopathy.

Impact of three-month treatment with pitavastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a prospective observational study

BackgroundAlthough several studies have highlighted the benefits of statins in improving arterial stiffness, there is limited research on whether pitavastatin, a more recently developed statin, has similar effects. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pitavastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia. MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 115 patients with hypercholesterolemia (mean age 59 years; 22% female) who had not previously been treated with statins. Participants underwent lifestyle interventions followed by administration of pitavastatin (2 or 4 mg daily) if target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were not achieved. The primary outcome measured was the change in brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) from baseline after three months of treatment. ResultsPitavastatin treatment significantly reduced LDL cholesterol by 41.1% (from 158 ± 28 to 93.0 ± 29.6 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Additionally, systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased significantly from 130 ± 14 mmHg to 126 ± 14 mmHg (P < 0.001), representing a 2.9% reduction, and baPWV decreased significantly from 1,522 ± 325 to 1,407 ± 289 cm/s (P < 0.001), a 7.6% reduction. There was a significant correlation between changes in SBP and changes in baPWV (r = 0.565; P < 0.001). Even after adjusting for changes in SBP, the reduction in baPWV induced by pitavastatin remained statistically significant (P < 0.001). ConclusionsA three-month treatment with pitavastatin effectively reduced arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia, alongside significant improvements in lipid profiles and blood pressure reductions. These findings support the use of pitavastatin for managing key cardiovascular risk factors.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Statin Users Compared to Fibrate Users in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (UK CPRD) GOLD.

A substantial proportion of adults receive statins for treatment of hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular risk, and statins have been found to improve outcomes in this patient population. However, studies have not consistently demonstrated the potential benefits of statins in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate this association. We conducted a cohort analysis in a study sample comprised of 40-79-year-old patients with hyperlipidemia who received at least one fibrate or statin prescription between January 1995 and December 2018 in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD. We evaluated the association between statin use and incident unprovoked VTE, compared to fibrate use, an active comparator, using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, Poisson regression (with and without propensity score matching), and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) marginal structural models (MSM). In this cohort of 166,292 patients with hyperlipidemia, 0.81% (N=1,353) developed incident unprovoked VTE. In analyses using the KM method, patients who received statins had a slightly lower risk of VTE compared to those who received fibrates (Log rank test: p=0.0524). The adjusted incident rate ratio (95% CI) for VTE, calculated using Poisson regression, controlling for serum cholesterol and other baseline covariates, in patients prescribed statins compared to fibrates was 0.77 (0.45-1.33) in the full cohort, 0.74 (0.38-1.45) in the propensity score matched analysis, and 0.51 (95% conservative CI: 0.34-0.76) in the IPTW MSM analysis. While the magnitude of effect varied across the different analytic methods, there is consistent evidence for a protective effect of statin use on the occurrence of unprovoked VTE.

Early statin use is associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent ischaemic stroke: A propensity-matched analysis of a global federated health database.

Statins reduce recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. The benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS. This retrospective, cohort study was conducted using deidentified electronic medical records within TriNetX platform. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received statins within 28 days of their index stroke were propensity score-matched with those who did not. Patients were followed up for up to 2 years. Primary outcomes were the 2-year risk of recurrent IS, all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, recurrent IS, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes were the 2-year risk of TIA, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), acute MI, and hospital readmission. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Of 20,902 patients with AF and recent IS, 7500 (35.9%) received statins within 28 days of their stroke and 13,402 (64.1%) did not. 11,182 patients (mean age 73.7 ± 11.5; 5277 (47.2%) female) remained after propensity score matching. Patients who received early statins had significantly lower risk of recurrent IS (HR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.41-0.48, p < 0.001), mortality (HR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.84, p < 0.001), the composite outcome (HR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.45-0.52, p < 0.001), TIA (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.30-0.44, p < 0.001), ICH (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.47-0.72, p < 0.001 ), acute MI (HR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.30-0.42, p < 0.001) and hospital readmission (HR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.42-0.50, <0.001). Beneficial effects of early statins were evident in the elderly, different ethnic groups, statin dose intensity, and AF subtypes, large vessel occlusion and embolic strokes and within the context of statin lipophilicity, optimal LDL-cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular comorbidities, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, and NIHSS 0-5 and NIHSS > 5 subgroups. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received early statins, had a lower risk of recurrent stroke, death, and other cardiovascular outcomes including ICH, compared to those who did not.

Using proteomics to identify the mechanisms underlying the benefits of statins on ischemic heart disease

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the single leading cause of mortality globally. Statins are the mainstay for IHD treatment. However, the specific mechanisms underlying statins’ benefits on IHD have not been clarified. To examine the mechanisms through proteins, we used two-step Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. First, we examined the associations of genetically mimicked statins with 2923 proteins using genome-wide association of proteins from the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project (UKB-PPP) to identify the proteins affected by statins, and replicated the findings using deCODE. Then we examined the associations of selected proteins with IHD risk using CARDIoGRAMplusC4D using MR, and replicated using FinnGen, and using another set of genetic instruments from deCODE. We selected proteins decreased or increased IHD risk and meanwhile increased or lowered by statins. We further examined the role of the selected protein(s) on common IHD comorbidities, including diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and kidney function (measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)). Nine proteins were affected by statins, including four proteins (PLA2G7, FGFBP1, ANGPTL1, and PTPRZ1) lowered by statins, and five proteins (EFNA4, COL6A3, ASGR1, PRSS8 and PCOLCE) increased by statins. Among these, PLA2G7 was related to higher risk of IHD after controlling for multiple testing. The associations were robust to different analytic methods and replication using another set of genetic instrument from deCODE, and using another GWAS of IHD from FinnGen. Genetically predicted PLA2G7 had null association with diabetes, CKD, and eGFR. We identified 9 proteins affected by statins, including 7 novel proteins which were not reported previously. PLA2G7 is on the pathway underlying statins’ benefits on IHD. The clarification of statins’ mechanisms had close relevance to precision medicine, and provided insights to the development of new treatment strategies.

Exploiting the anti-fibrotic effects of statins on thoracic aortic aneurysm progression: results from a meta-analysis and experimental data.

Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) that progress to acute aortic dissection is often fatal and there is no pharmacological treatment that can reduce TAA progression. We aim to evaluate statins' effects on TAA growth rate and outcomes using a meta-analysis approach. A detailed search related to the effects of statins on TAA was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The analyses of statins' effects on TAA growth rate were performed on 4 studies (n = 1850), while the impact on outcomes was evaluated on 3 studies (n = 2,867). Patients under statin treatment showed a reduced TAA growth rate (difference in means = -0.36cm/year; 95%CI: -0.64, -0.08; p = 0.013) when compared to controls, patients not taking statins. Regarding the outcomes (death, dissection, or rupture of the aorta, and the need for operative repair), statins exhibited a protective effect reducing the number of events (log odds ratio = -0.56; 95%CI: -1.06, -0.05; p = 0.030). In vitro, the anti-fibrotic effect of atorvastatin was tested on vascular smooth muscle cells (VMSC) isolated from patients with TAA. Our results highlighted that, in transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) pro-fibrotic condition, VSMC expressed a significant lower amount of collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1) when treated with atorvastatin (untreated = +2.66 ± 0.23 fold-change vs. treated = +1.63 ± 0.09 fold-change; p = 0.014). Statins show a protective effect on TAA growth rate and adverse outcomes in patients with TAA, possibly via their anti-fibrotic properties on VSMC. Given the current lack of effective drug treatments for TAA, we believe our findings highlight the need for more in-depth research to explore the potential benefits of statins in this context.

Statin Therapy, Inflammation, and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

BackgroundStatins are lipid-lowering agents with anti-inflammatory effects. Data surrounding the benefits of statins in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are conflicting. We sought to better understand the impact of statins in the context of COVID-19-related inflammation. MethodsWe leveraged the International Study of Inflammation in COVID-19, a prospective multicenter cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 2020 and October 2022. Participants underwent systematic assessment of biomarkers of inflammation. We used logistic regression modeling and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) to examine the association between prior statin use and the composite outcome of in-hospital death, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy. ResultsA total of 4464 patients were included in the study, of whom 1364 (27.5%) were taking a statin prior to admission. There were 1061 primary outcome events, including 540 deaths, 854 mechanical ventilation and 313 renal replacement therapy. Amongst biomarkers of inflammation, statin use was associated solely with lower levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) after adjusting for known confounders. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, statin use was associated with lower odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.63, 95% CI [0.53-0.76]) compared to patients not on statins. Findings were consistent with IPTW (aOR 0.92, 95% CI [0.89- 0.95]). The proportion of the effect of statin on the primary outcome mediated by suPAR was estimated at 31.5%. ConclusionPrior-statin use is associated with improved outcomes and lower inflammation as measured by suPAR levels in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Association between the use of statins and in-hospital mortality risk in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy during ICU stays: a study based on medical information mart for intensive care database

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to explore the correlation between statin administration in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and the in-hospital mortality risk of patients suffering from sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC).MethodsUtilizing a retrospective cohort study design, this investigation collected data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV spanning 2008 to 2019. The diagnosis of SIC was established based on a SIC score of 4 or above. Statin usage during the ICU period was extracted from the prescription records based on the keywords of statin medications. The primary endpoint analyzed was the in-hospital mortality within the ICU, characterized by any death occurring during the ICU admission.ResultsDuring the follow-up, which had a median duration of approximately 7.28 days, 18.19% of the 4,777 SIC patients died in the ICU. Statin was linked with a decrease in the risk of in-hospital mortality for SIC patients in the ICU [hazard ratio (HR): 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60–0.89, P = 0.002]. Relative to rosuvastatin, the use of atorvastatin (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34–0.85, P = 0.008) or simvastatin (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33–0.92, P = 0.024), as well as combinations of multiple statins (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.86, P = 0.022), was associated with a reduction in ICU in-hospital mortality risk. Subgroup analysis also suggested that the use of atorvastatin, simvastatin, or a combination of statins had an advantage over rosuvastatin in reducing ICU in-hospital mortality in SIC patients older than 65 years of age or SIC patients with respiratory failure or cardiogenic shock (all P < 0.05).ConclusionThe present study supports the potential benefits of statin use in mortality in SIC patients during ICU stays. The study encourages clinicians to consider the benefits of statins and supports the ongoing exploration of statins for enhanced outcomes in critical care settings.

Statins and Venous Thromboembolic Disease - Where are we Now?

Classical risk factors for atherosclerosis also play a role in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol has prothrombotic and endothelium- deteriorating effects which are not limited to the arterial system. The association between hypercholesterolemia and VTE has been established, but the benefits of statins in the prevention of VTE assessed by observation studies seemed equivocal. The large, randomized trial Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) recorded the occurrence of VTE as a protocol-specified endpoint and reported a reduced incidence of VTE among subjects taking 20 mg of rosuvastatin daily vs placebo (hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.86; p=0.007). Similar results were confirmed by meta-analyses of observation studies and randomized trials. Recently, a Mendelian randomization study that took the presence of gene variants coding for less efficient hydroxymethyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity as a proxy for statin treatment, confirmed a small, but significant negative association between the score of selected genetic polymorphisms and the incidence of VTE. However, since the protective effects of statins are limited, they should not be substituted for guideline-recommended VTE prophylaxis or anticoagulation treatment.

Atorvastatin Effect on Aortic Dilatation and Valvular Calcification Progression in Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BICATOR): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ascending aorta dilation and aortic valve degeneration are common complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Several retrospective studies have suggested the benefit of statins in reducing these complications. This study aimed to determine whether atorvastatin treatment is effective in reducing the growth of aortic diameters in bicuspid aortic valve and if it slows the progression of valve calcification. In a randomized clinical trial, 220 patients with bicuspid aortic valve (43 women; 46±13 years of age) were included and treated with either 20 mg of atorvastatin per day or placebo for 3 years. Inclusion criteria were ≥18 years of age, nonsevere valvular dysfunction, nonsevere valve calcification, and ascending aorta diameter ≤50 mm. Computed tomography and echocardiography studies were performed at baseline and after 3 years of treatment. During follow-up, 28 patients (12.7%) discontinued medical treatment (15 on atorvastatin and 13 taking placebo). Thus, 192 patients completed the 36 months of treatment. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased significantly in the atorvastatin group (median [interquartile range], -30 mg/dL [-51.65 to -1.75 mg/dL] versus 6 mg/dL [-4, 22.5 mg/dL]; P<0.001). The maximum ascending aorta diameter increased with no differences between groups: 0.65 mm (95% CI, 0.45-0.85) in the atorvastatin group and 0.74 mm (95% CI, 0.45-1.04) in the placebo group (P=0.613). Similarly, no significant differences were found for the progression of the aortic valve calcium score (P=0.167) or valvular dysfunction. Among patients with bicuspid aortic valve without severe valvular dysfunction, atorvastatin treatment was not effective in reducing the progression of ascending aorta dilation and aortic valve calcification during 3 years of treatment despite a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: 2015-001808-57. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02679261.

302P A multicenter retrospective study of survival benefits of statins in unresectable or recurrent advanced biliary tract cancer patients

302P A multicenter retrospective study of survival benefits of statins in unresectable or recurrent advanced biliary tract cancer patients

Statins in Chronic Liver Disease: Review of the Literature and Future Role.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major contributor to global mortality, morbidity, and healthcare burden. Progress in pharmacotherapeutic for CLD management is lagging given its impact on the global population. While statins are indicated for the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, their role in CLD prevention and treatment is emerging. Beyond their lipid-lowering effects, their liver-related mechanisms of action are multifactorial and include anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and immune-protective effects. In this review, we highlight what is known about the clinical benefits of statins in viral and nonviral etiologies of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and explore key mechanisms and pathways targeted by statins. While their benefits may span the spectrum of CLD and potentially HCC treatment, their role in CLD chemoprevention is likely to have the largest impact. As emerging data suggest that genetic variants may impact their benefits, the role of statins in precision hepatology will need to be further explored.

Abstract PO4-13-10: The anti-metastatic role of BMP4 through cholesterol biosynthesis inhibition and consequent interaction with statin benefit in breast cancer

Abstract We have previously identified a role for bone morphogenic protein 4 (BMP4) in reducing distant relapse risk after early breast cancer (BrCa) (1). We therefore set out to identify mechanisms underlying the protective effect of BMP4, looking to translate this finding for patient benefit. A highly metastatic variant of the triple negative MDA-MB-231 human BrCa line (231-HM-turboGFP) was transduced with BMP4, leading to sustained BMP4 secretion. These modified tumours were established in NSG mice, resected at a given size and turboGFP-positive cancer cells were recovered from primary tumours for RNA sequencing analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was completed to identify signalling pathways that were significantly modulated by BMP4. The four most significantly downregulated gene sets were associated with cholesterol synthesis, with the overwhelming majority of genes in this pathway being downregulated. BMP4 downregulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 1 (HMGCS1, involved in cholesterol biosynthesis) was confirmed at the protein level by western blotting on whole tumour lysates. Forced expression of BMP4 also led to a significant reduction in the levels of free and total cholesterol. In a confirmatory analysis of the METABRIC human BrCa dataset, the expression of cholesterol biosynthesis-related genes inversely correlated with the expression of BMP4. Further, for the majority of these genes, expression was elevated in high-grade breast tumours, and predicted worse overall survival of patients. Finally, we tested the effect of a lipophilic statin, lovastatin, on the growth and metastasis of 231-HM-turboGFP tumours. Treatment did not affect the growth of primary tumours but significantly less metastases were observed in the lungs of treated mice, at least partially replicating the anti-metastatic effect of BMP4. Having identified inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis as a potential mechanism of protective BMP4 action we then asked if BMP4 status interacted with any protective effect of co-administered statins. We therefore returned to the cohort initially employed to demonstrate BMP4 benefit (1) and looked at the interaction between BMP4 protein levels and statin usage with regards to recurrence. BMP4 protein and statin usage data were available on a cohort of 417 patients with early BrCa. Statin use compared to none led to a reduced risk of distant relapse (8 v 22%, 0.0029) at 15 years. BMP4 led to borderline reduction in distant relapse (16 v 24%, p=0.052). In BMP4 negative tumours, statin protected against any relapse (p=0.0025) whereas in BMP4 positive disease no significant risk reduction was not significant (p=0.074). Absence of BMP4 expression may be a biomarker of both higher relapse risk and statin benefit in early BrCa. 1. Eckhardt et al, Cancer Res. 2020;80(6):1304-1315 Citation Format: Lap Hing Chi, Andrew Redfern, Allan Burrows, Suraya Roslan, Leone Oh, Lisa Spalding, Robin Anderson. The anti-metastatic role of BMP4 through cholesterol biosynthesis inhibition and consequent interaction with statin benefit in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-13-10.

Statin-Associated Liver Dysfunction and Muscle Injury: epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management Strategies.

Surveillance of drug safety is an important aspect in the routine medical care. Adverse events caused by real-world drug utilization has become one of the leading causes of death and an urgent issue in the field of toxicology. Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of fatal diseases in most countries, especially in the elderly population who often suffer from multiple diseases and need long-term multidrug therapy. Among which, statins have been widely used to lower bad cholesterol and regress coronary plaque mainly in patients with hyperlipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Although the real-world benefits of statins are significant, different degrees and types of adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as liver dysfunction and muscle injury, have a great impact on the original treatment regimens as well as the quality of life. This review describes the epidemiology, mechanisms, early identification and post-intervention of statin-associated liver dysfunction and muscle injury based on the updated clinical evidence. It provides systematic and comprehensive guidance and necessary supplement for the clinical safety of statin use in cardiovascular diseases.

Effects of statins beyond lipid-lowering agents in ART-treated HIV infection.

Antiretroviral therapies (ART) have reduced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection-associated morbidity and mortality improving the life of people with HIV (PWH). However, ART lead to residual HIV production, which in conjunction with microbial translocation and immune dysfunction contributes to chronic inflammation and immune activation. PWH on ART remain at an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) including myocardial infarction and stroke; which in part is explained by chronic inflammation and immune activation. Lifestyle factors and certain ART are associated with dyslipidemia characterized by an increase of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), which further contributes in the increased risk for CVDs. Lipid-lowering agents like statins are emerging as immune modulators in decreasing inflammation in a variety of conditions including HIV. The international randomized clinical trial REPRIEVE has shed light on the reduction of CVDs with statin therapy among PWH. Such reports indicate a more than expected benefit of statins beyond their lipid-lowering effects. Bempedoic acid, a first-in-class non-statin LDL-lowering drug with immune modulatory effects, may further aid PWH in combination with statins. Herein, we critically reviewed studies aimed at lipid-lowering and immune-modulating roles of statins that may benefit aging PWH.

Association between Statin Use and Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced cardiac dysfunction (CIC) is a significant and concerning complication observed among cancer patients. Despite the demonstrated cardioprotective benefits of statins in various cardiovascular diseases, their effectiveness in mitigating CIC remains uncertain. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the potential cardioprotective role of statins in patients with CIC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify relevant articles published from inception until 10th May 2023. The outcomes were assessed using pooled odds ratio (OR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: This meta-analysis comprised nine studies involving a total of 5532 patients, with 1904 in the statin group and 3628 in the non-statin group. The pooled analysis of primary outcome shows that patients who did not receive statin suffer a greater decline in the LVEF after chemotherapy compared to those who receive statin (MD, 3.55 (95% CI: 1.04-6.05), p = 0.01). Likewise, we observed a significantly higher final mean LVEF among chemotherapy patients with statin compared to the non-statin group of patients (MD, 2.08 (95% CI: 0.86-3.30), p > 0.001). Additionally, there was a lower risk of incident heart failure in the statin group compared to the non-statin group of patients (OR, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27-0.62), p < 0.001). Lastly, the change in the mean difference for LVEDV was not statistically significant between the statin and non-statin groups (MD, 1.55 (95% CI: -5.22-8.33), p = 0.65). Conclusion: Among patients of CIC, statin use has shown cardioprotective benefits by improving left ventricular function and reducing the risk of heart failure.