Benefit Of Bevacizumab Research Articles

A Consensus Statement on the Administration of Systemic Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

To provide detailed guidance on the administration of systemic bevacizumab in patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) based on a detailed review of the scientific literature and a consensus of experts with real-world clinical experience. A bevacizumab consensus working group (N = 10) was composed of adult and pediatric otolaryngologists, adult and pediatric oncologists, and a representative from the RRP Foundation (RRPF), all with experience administering systemic bevacizumab in patients with RRP. After extensive review of the medical literature, a modified Delphi method-based survey series was utilized to establish consensus on the following key areas: clinical and patient characteristics ideal for treatment candidacy, patient perspective in treatment decisions, treatment access, initial dosing, monitoring, guidelines for tapering and discontinuation, and reintensifying therapy. Seventy-nine statements were identified across nine critical domains, and 45 reached consensus [clinical benefits of bevacizumab (3), patient and disease characteristics for treatment consideration (7), contraindications for treatment (3), shared decision-making (incorporating the patient perspective) (5), treatment access (3), initial dosing and administration (8), monitoring (7), tapering and discontinuation (6), and reintensification (3)]. This consensus statement provides the necessary guidance for clinicians to initiate systemic administration of bevacizumab and represents a potential paradigm shift toward nonsurgical treatment options for patients with RRP. 5 Laryngoscope, 134:5041-5046, 2024.

Gene expression signature-defined necroinflammation is not associated with sex-biased survival or bevacizumab benefit in glioblastoma.

Gene expression signature-defined necroinflammation is not associated with sex-biased survival or bevacizumab benefit in glioblastoma.

Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for treating patients with advanced RET+ non-small cell lung cancer.

8647 Background: RET inhibitors (RETi) are currently the preferred first-line treatment in advanced RET fusion-positive (RET+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite impressive efficacy of RETi, resistance is inevitable, and the optimal therapy beyond RETi remains unclear. Immunotherapy has shown limited efficacy in these patients. This study aims to investigate the impact of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy regimens on treatment outcomes. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with RET+ advanced NSCLC who received either a platinum-doublet chemotherapy (D) (+/-anti-PD-L(1) agents (ICB)) or a non-platinum monotherapy (M), with or without bevacizumab (Bev). Non-platinum agents were limited to pemetrexed, paclitaxel, or docetaxel. Only the first administration of the regimen was considered. Objective responses (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from the start of treatment were compared between patients receiving and not receiving Bev. Results: Of 185 patients, 20 received Bev in doublet chemotherapy (D+Bev, none with ICB) and 165 did not (D, 68 with ICB). Additionally, 40 underwent single-agent chemotherapy, with 8 on Bev (M+Bev) and 32 without (M). D+Bev patients were younger (median age: 54 vs. 61 years, p=0.026), less often treated with RETi (55% vs. 79%, p=0.023), with no other demographic or disease-related group differences. Both D+Bev and D had a median of 1 treatment line [IQR 1-1]. M+Bev and M had a median of 3 and 2 treatment lines, respectively (p=0.3), and numerically more M+Bev patients had brain metastases (25% vs. 13%, p=0.6). In the D+Bev vs D (+/-ICB) comparison, the OR was 55% vs 47% (p=0.7), and the median PFS was significantly longer in the D+Bev group (17 months vs. 8.8 months, p=0.018). When comparing D+Bev with D+ICB, D+Bev still showed a significant advantage in median PFS (17 months vs 9.7 months, p=0.05). The median OS was 51.4 months for D+Bev compared to 38.7 months for D (p=0.89). Multivariate analysis revealed that Bev use was independently associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.4, p=0.01), while ECOG>1 (HR 4.3, p<0.0001) and male sex (HR 1.7, p=0.01) were associated with shorter PFS. In the M+Bev versus M group, the OR was 13% versus 25% (p=0.6), median PFS was 2.4 months versus 4.1 months (p=0.06), and median OS was 12.1 months versus 39 months (p=0.06). Conclusions: Bevacizumab with platinum-doublet chemotherapy seems to outperform platinum-doublet with or without ICB in progression-free survival. Prospective research is needed to evaluate the extent of bevacizumab's benefit for RET+ NSCLC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: Preliminary result of a single-arm study.

e16205 Background: IMbrave150 study confirmed the clinical benefit of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, patients with extrahepatic metastasis (EHS) had a poorer prognosis. Studies suggested “abscopal effect” of synchronous radiotherapy and immunotherapy may improve antitumor activity. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in HCC patients with EHS. Methods: This single-arm study included HCC patients with EHS from January 2022 to November 2023 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor and/or immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment were eligible. After first dose atezolizumab and bevacizumab, SBRT was performed with a total dose of 25-50 Gy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and duration of response (DOR). Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Fourteen patients were treated as first-line therapy and 25 patients were treated as later-line therapy. The mean age was 56.69±11.21 years and 89.7% were male. Of these patients, 66.7% had hepatitis viral infection and 25.6% had vascular invasion. 53.8% of patients had ≥2 extrahepatic spread lesions. In addition, 33.3% of patients had received prior immunotherapy and 23.1% of patients had received tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The median follow-up was 6.50 (range: 1.43-22.17) months. The ORR and DCR were 43.6% and 92.3%, respectively. The ORR was 57.1% and 36.0% in first-line subgroup and later-line subgroup, respectively. The 12-month OS rates was 54.7%. The median PFS, median TTP and median DOR were 6.73 months, 8.67 months, and 7.17 months, respectively. The incidence of all grade TRAE and grade ≥3 TRAE were 38.5% and 12.8%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were decreased platelet count (7.7%), decreased white blood cell count (2.6%), pruritus (2.6%) and rectal bleeding (2.6%). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: SBRT combined with systemic atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed encouraging efficacy with manageable safety profile for HCC patients with EHS regardless of prior treatment. Further studies are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05396937 . [Table: see text]

47MO The risk index of early relapse defined by MiROvaR, a miRNA-based classifier, is a potential predictive marker for bevacizumab benefit: A MITO-MANGO-ENGOT study

47MO The risk index of early relapse defined by MiROvaR, a miRNA-based classifier, is a potential predictive marker for bevacizumab benefit: A MITO-MANGO-ENGOT study

HER2 Gene Expression Levels Are Predictive and Prognostic in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405.

The phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in combination with either bevacizumab or cetuximab. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and gene expression using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and NanoString data. Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (FoundationOne CDx). Tumor tissue from 925 patients was tested for NanoString gene expression using an 800-gene panel. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were the time-to-event end points. High HER2 expression (dichotomized at median) was associated with longer PFS (11.6 v 10 months, P = .012) and OS (32 v 25.3 months, P = .033), independent of treatment. An OS benefit for cetuximab versus bevacizumab was observed in the high HER2 expression group (P = .02), whereas a worse PFS for cetuximab was seen in the low-expression group (P = .019). When modeled as a continuous variable, increased HER2 expression was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93]; adjusted P = .0007) and PFS (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.91]; adjusted P = .0002), reaching a plateau effect after the median. In patients with HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with cetuximab was associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.71]; adjusted P = .0027) and OS (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59]; adjusted P = .03) compared with that with bevacizumab. A significant interaction between HER2 expression and the treatment arm was observed for OS (Pintx = .017), PFS (Pintx = .048), and objective response rate (Pintx = .001). HER2 gene expression was prognostic and predictive in CALGB/SWOG 80405. HER2 tumor expression may inform treatment selection for patients with low HER2 favoring bevacizumab- versus cetuximab-based therapies.

Abstract A109: Novel germline genetic variants in pseudogenes associated with overall survival in advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab: Results from the ROSiA trial

Abstract A109: Novel germline genetic variants in pseudogenes associated with overall survival in advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab: Results from the ROSiA trial

Sexual-biased necroinflammation is revealed as a predictor of bevacizumab benefit in glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor that affects men more often than women. In addition, the former shows a poorer survival prognosis. To date, the reason for this sex-specific aggressiveness remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate tumor processes that explain these sex differences. This was a retrospective study of GBM patients which was stratified according to sex. A cohort with 73 tumors was analyzed with immunohistochemistry, RNA-seq and RT-qPCR to characterize differences in vascular and immunological profiles. Transcriptomic profiling, gene set enrichment analysis, and pathway enrichment analysis were used for discovering molecular pathways predominant in each group. We further investigated the therapeutic effect of bevacizumab (vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) blocking antibody) in a retrospective GBM cohort (36 tumors) based on sex differences. We found that under hypoxic tumor conditions, 2 distinct tumor immuno-angiogenic ecosystems develop linked to sex differences and ESR1 expression is generated. One of these subgroups, which includes male patients with low ESR1 expression, is characterized by vascular fragility associated with the appearance of regions of necrosis and high inflammation (called necroinflamed tumors). This male-specific tumor subtype shows high inflammation related to myeloid-derived suppressor cells infiltration. Using this stratification, we identified a possible group of patients who could respond to bevacizumab (BVZ) and revealed a genetic signature that may find clinical applications as a predictor of those who may benefit most from this treatment. This study provides a stratification based on the sexual differences in GBM, which associates the poor prognosis with the presence of immunosuppressive myeloid cells in the necrotic areas. This new stratification could change the current prognosis of GBM and identifies those who respond to BVZ treatment.

Effectiveness of bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the benefit of bevacizumab under the comprehensive treatment strategy and its advantages over other drugs, so as to provide reference for the formulation of clinical plans.MethodsAs of October 1, 2022, the randomized controlled clinical trials of bevacizumab in combination with metastatic colorectal cancer published in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Medline databases were searched. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the short-term disease control effect and long-term survival of the treatment strategy.Results21 RCTs (6665 patients; 3356 patients in the experimental group and 3309 patients in the control group; average age, 55–75 years) were treated with bevacizumab as the experimental group for metastatic colorectal cancer. BEV has stronger anti-tumor activity than the single treatment scheme (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11–1.52). And Benefits of the BEV group were 0.73 (0.55, 0.96), 1.26 (0.71, 2.24), 1.63 (0.92, 2.87) and 0.07 (0.02, 0.25) compared with CET, VAN, CED and PAN respectively. The disease control of BEV combined therapy was better (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04–1.78). The same as compared with cediranib (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.06–3.55). However, the long-term prognosis of BEV, including the overall survival (HRs = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84–1.15) and progression-free survival (HRs = 1.05,95% CI: 0.97–1.13) were not prolonged. The survival benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab were not reflected.ConclusionThe addition of BEV can enhance the anti-tumor ability and disease control, while cetuximab and panitumumab may have stronger ability. However, it did not effectively improve the survival of patients. A more reasonable and effective treatment plan needs more clinical experimental support.

Primary Tumor Resection in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Upfront Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab: A Pooled Analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 Studies.

The decision to resect or not the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a complex and challenging issue for oncologists, especially when an antiangiogenic-based therapy is planned. Patients enrolled in the phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies that compared upfront FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX + bevacizumab, respectively, were included. We assessed the association of primary tumor resection (PTR) with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR), rate of grade > 2 adverse events (AEs), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs in the overall population and according to the treatment arm. Of the 999 patients included, 513 (51%) underwent PTR at baseline. Longer PFS and OS were observed in resected patients compared to those with unresected primary tumors: 11.2 vs. 10.0 months (p < 0.001) and 26.6 vs. 22.5 (p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate models, PTR was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for better PFS (p = 0.032) and OS (p = 0.018). Patients with PTR experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (p = 0.055) and lower incidence of anemia (p = 0.053), perforation (p = 0.015), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted in incidence of bleeding (p = 0.39). The benefit of FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab in terms of PFS (p for interaction: 0.46), OS (p for interaction: 0.80), ORR (p for interaction: 0.36), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was independent of PTR. PTR at baseline was independently associated with good prognosis in synchronous mCRC patients and with lower incidence of serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs during upfront chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The benefit and toxicity profile of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab was independent of PTR.

Artificial intelligence-based pathology as a biomarker of sensitivity to atezolizumab–bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study

Clinical benefits of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezolizumab-bevacizumab) are observed only in a subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and the development of biomarkers is needed to improve therapeutic strategies. The atezolizumab-bevacizumab response signature (ABRS), assessed by molecular biology profiling techniques, has been shown to be associated with progression-free survival after treatment initiation. The primary objective of our study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model able to estimate ABRS expression directly from histological slides, and to evaluate if model predictions were associated with progression-free survival. In this multicentre retrospective study, we developed a model (ABRS-prediction; ABRS-P), which was derived from the previously published clustering-constrained attention multiple instance learning (or CLAM) pipeline. We trained the model fit for regression analysis using a multicentre dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (patients treated by surgical resection, n=336). The ABRS-P model was externally validated on two independent series of samples from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (a surgical resection series, n=225; and a biopsy series, n=157). The predictive value of the model was further tested in a series of biopsy samples from a multicentre cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab (n=122). All samples in the study were from adults (aged ≥18 years). The validation sets were sampled between Jan 1, 2008, to Jan 1, 2023. For the multicentre validation set, the primary objective was to assess the association of high versus low ABRS-P values, defined relative to cross-validation median split thresholds in the first biopsy series, with progression-free survival after treatment initiation. Finally, we performed spatial transcriptomics and matched prediction heatmaps with in situ expression profiles. Of the 840 patients sampled, 641 (76%) were male and 199 (24%) were female. Across the development and validation datasets, hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors included alcohol intake, hepatitis B and C virus infections, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Using cross-validation in the development series, the mean Pearson's correlation between ABRS-P values and ABRS score (mean expression of ABRS genes) was r=0·62 (SD 0·09; mean p<0·0001, SD<0·0001). The ABRS-P generalised well on the external validation series (surgical resection series, r=0·60 [95% CI 0·51-0·68], p<0·0001; biopsy series, r=0·53 [0·40-0·63], p<0·0001). In the 122 patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab, those with ABRS-P-high tumours (n=74) showed significantly longer median progression-free survival than those with ABRS-P-low tumours (n=48) after treatment initiation (12 months [95% CI 7-not reached] vs 7 months [4-9]; p=0·014). Spatial transcriptomics showed significantly higher ABRS score, along with upregulation of various other immune effectors, in tumour areas with high ABRS-P values versus areas with low ABRS-P values. Our study indicates that AI applied on hepatocellular carcinoma digital slides is able to serve as a biomarker for progression-free survival in patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. This approach could be used in the development of inexpensive and fast biomarkers for targeted therapies. The combination of AI heatmaps with spatial transcriptomics provides insight on the molecular features associated with predictions. This methodology could be applied to other cancers or diseases and improve understanding of the biological mechanisms that drive responses to treatments. Institut National du Cancer, Fondation ARC, China Scholarship Council, Ligue Contre le Cancer du Val de Marne, Fondation de l'Avenir, Ipsen, and Fondation Bristol Myers Squibb Pour la Recherche en Immuno-Oncologie.

The proneural subtype is not associated with survival benefit from bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of the GLARIUS trial

PurposeThe AVAglio trial reported a significant survival benefit for first line bevacizumab treatment in patients with IDH wildtype glioblastoma of the proneural gene expression subtype. We here aim to replicate these findings in an independent trial cohort.MethodsWe evaluate the treatment benefit of bevacizumab according to gene expression subtypes of pretreatment tumor samples (n = 123) in the GLARIUS trial (NCT00967330) for MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma patients with Kaplan-Meier analyses, log-rank tests and Cox regression models.ResultsEmploying the Phillips classifier, bevacizumab conferred a significant PFS advantage in patients with proneural IDH wild-type tumors (10.4 vs. 6.0 months, p = 0.002), but no OS advantage (16.4 vs. 17.4 months, p = 0.6). Multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic covariates confirmed the absence of a significant OS advantage from bevacizumab (hazard ratio, 1.05, 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.64; p = 0.14). Further, there was no interaction between the proneural subtype and treatment arm (p = 0.15). These results were confirmed in analyses of tumor subgroups according to the Verhaak classifier.ConclusionIn contrast to AVAglio, glioblastoma gene expression subgroups were not associated with a differential OS benefit from first-line bevacizumab in the GLARIUS trial.

β2-adrenergic receptor expression in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was initially known as vascular permeability factor and identified as a driver of tumour angiogenesis. Recently, its role in supporting an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment was demonstrated, and anti-VEGF treatment combined with immune checkpoint blockade is currently investigated. Further, beta-adrenergic signalling as a modifier of cancer hallmarks like immune response, angiogenesis and metastasis gained increased attention during past years. Focusing on the aspect of immunosuppression in upregulated beta-adrenergic signalling, we investigated predictive markers in patients with metastatic melanoma who received bevacizumab monotherapy, a specific VEGF-A binding antibody. We explored the expression of beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR), interleukin 6-receptor (IL6-R), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) and VEGF-A by immunohistochemistry in melanoma to assess the correlation between these proteins in melanoma cells and response to treatment. Strong β2-AR expression in metastases was associated with clinical benefit of bevacizumab. Furthermore, expression of the latter was positively linked to expression of VEGF-A and COX2. β2-AR expression in melanoma metastasis appears to distinguish a subgroup of patients that might benefit from anti-VEGF treatment. Our results strengthen further exploration of anti-VEGF therapy in combination with immune checkpoint blockade in clinical studies and the investigation of β2-AR as predictive marker.

Different doses of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis.

The aim of the present study was to explore the incremental benefit of bevacizumab (Bev) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with different doses. A literature search of eight electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, Chinese Biomedical Database, VIP medicine information, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) was conducted from database creation to December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared Bev at various dosages + chemotherapy (CT) versus placebo (or blank control) + CT were selected. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were integrated first by pooled analysis. The likelihood of ideal dosage of Bev was then ranked using random effects within Bayesian analysis. Twenty-six RCTs involving 18,261 patients met the inclusion criteria. OS increased significantly after using 5mg (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00) and 10mg dosages of Bev (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85) with CT, but statistical significance was not attained for the 7.5mg dose (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). A significantly increased in PFS with doses of 5mg (HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.83), 7.5mg (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.00), and 10mg (HR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68). ORR distinctly increased after 5mg (RR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55), 7.5mg (RR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50), and10mg (RR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.84) doses were administered. Grade ≥ 3 AEs increased clearly in 5mg (RR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) compared to 7.5mg (RR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.35) and 10mg (RR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.36). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that 10mg Bev obtained the maximum time of OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CrI 0.58 to 0.97; probability rank = 0.05) indirectly compared to 5mg and 7.5mg Bev. Compared with 5mg and 7.5mg Bev, 10mg Bev also holds the longest duration for PFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.43 to 0.82; probability rank = 0.00). In terms of ORR, 10mg Bev holds the maximum frequency (RR: 2.02, 95% CrI 1.52 to 2.66; probability rank = 0.98) in comparison to 5mg and 7.5mg Bev clearly. For grade ≥ 3 AEs, 10mg Bev has the maximum incidence (RR: 1.15, 95% CrI 0.95 to 1.40, probability rank = 0.67) in comparison to other doses of Bev. The study suggests that 10mg dose Bev could be more effective in treating advanced CRC in efficacy, but 5mg Bev could be more safer in terms of safety.

Real-world comparison of triplet- versus doublet-chemotherapy with bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

3574 Background: Meta-analysis of five randomized intensification trials in mCRC demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit of triplet chemotherapy (5FU/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (Triplet/Bev) compared to doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (Doublet/Bev) (HR 0.81). Guidelines recommend first-line Triplet/Bev for patients with excellent performance status and normal organ function who can withstand increased toxicity, but such patients are less represented in the real world. In this retrospective cohort study, we examine the real-world effectiveness of Triplet/Bev compared to Doublet/Bev in the U.S. Methods: We used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database, comprising de-identified patient-level structured and unstructured data curated via technology-enabled abstraction from ~ 280 cancer clinics. Included were mCRC patients treated with first-line Triplet/Bev or Doublet/Bev between 10/23/14 and 10/31/22. OS by treatment was assessed using the Kaplan Meier method and adjustment for confounding variables was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Pre-specified confounding variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, year of metastatic diagnosis, health insurance, practice setting, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation status, MMR/MSI status, synchronous/metachronous metastases, primary tumor sidedness, CEA, renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, and ECOG performance status. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation with chained equations. Results: Among 10,016 patients, 391 (3.9%) received Triplet/Bev and 9,625 (96.1%) received Doublet/Bev. Patients who received Triplet/Bev were younger (median age 52 vs 63 years) and were more likely to be treated at academic practices (27% vs 8%), to have synchronous metastatic disease (83% vs 65%), and to have KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type disease (30% vs 17%). In the univariate analysis, median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI 24.7 – 34.7) in the Triplet/Bev cohort versus 23.4 months (95% CI 22.8 – 24.1) in the Doublet/Bev cohort (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62 – 0.85; p &lt; 0.001). In Cox proportional hazards modeling with IPTW, there was no significant difference in hazard of death between Triplet/Bev and Doublet/Bev (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75 – 1.12; p = 0.4). Conclusions: In this large, national, real-world population of patients with mCRC, first-line treatment with Triplet/Bev was not associated with improved survival compared to Doublet/Bev after accounting for differences in baseline patient characteristics. The benefit to Triplet/Bev observed in randomized trials does not translate well to a more heterogeneous, real-world population. Sub-group analyses including by age, tumor sidedness, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status, and baseline CEA level will be performed.

Outcomes with bevacizumab for radiation induced-brain necrosis.

e14006 Background: Radiation necrosis (RN) is post-radiation complication that leads to increased permeability and disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB). This in turn leads to a pro-inflammatory state and an increased production of vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against VEGF and is a potential treatment for RN. The objective of the study is to assess effectiveness of bevacizumab (BEV) for the treatment of brain RN in adults. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 22 patients with various solid malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), metastatic melanoma and breast cancer with clinical or radiographic diagnosis of RN seen at Memorial Cancer Institute (MCI) in a 3-year period, from January 1st, 2019 to January 1st, 2023. Radiation doses ranged from 18-24 Gy (single fraction) or 24-27 Gy (3-fraction) for radiosurgery and 30-37.5 Gy for whole brain radiotherapy. Patients were identified that developed RN and VEGF inhibitors were subsequently given to assess effectiveness in the treatment of the condition. We evaluated the dose, frequency, number of treatments received, adverse effects and therapeutic benefits of BEV. Therapeutic benefit was defined as patients that received bevacizumab had a radiological and clinical improvement of the RN (clinical benefit). Brain imaging with MRI or PET/CT scan was completed both pre and post treatment to evaluate efficacy of treatment. Patients were initially given 4 cycles with a subsequent 4 more cycles if it was beneficial and tolerated treatment. Results: 22 patients were included in the study, 9 were males (41%) and median age 66 (range 31-81). 91% (20/22) had a diagnosis of lung cancer. 1 patient had a diagnosis of SCLC, while 19 were diagnosed with NSCLC. The study had a good representation of different races including Non-Hispanic Whites 7 (32%), Hispanics 10 (45%), Blacks 13% (3) and Asians 10% (2). Over 95% (21/22) of patients achieved a clinical benefit, while one patient did not (5%). Patients experienced improvement in cognitive function, headaches, dizziness, weakness, and other symptoms with BEV. MRIs showed improvement in edema and a reduction/stabilization of brain lesions. The most frequent dosing regimen used was BEV 10 mg/kg every two weeks. The median number of cycles given was 4 cycles (1-12). The most common adverse events were hypertension, minor nose bleeding, an occasional protein found in urine. There were no severe AEs or discontinuation of therapy with bevacizumab. Conclusions: This study demonstrated treatment with BEV 10 mg/kg every two weeks for a total of 12 cycles is well tolerated and has potential clinical benefit in RN in lung cancer patients with CNS metastasis. The therapeutic effects of VEGF inhibitors were seen in our small population study but warrants further investigation in a larger population study.

Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab for kidney metastatic collecting duct and medullary carcinomas: Results of a prospective phase II trial (BEVABEL-GETUG/AFU24)

BackgroundRenal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are rare entities with a poor outcome. First-line metastatic treatment is based on gemcitabine + platinum chemotherapy (GC) regimen but retrospective data suggest enhanced anti-tumour activity with the addition of bevacizumab. Therefore, we performed a prospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of GC + bevacizumab in metastatic RMC/CDC. MethodsWe conducted a phase 2 open-label trial in 18 centres in France in patients with metastatic RMC/CDC and no prior systemic treatment. Patients received bevacizumab plus GC up to 6 cycles followed, for non-progressive disease, by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary end-points were objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (ORR-6; PFS-6). PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end-points. At interim analysis, the trial was closed due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. ResultsFrom 2015 to 2019, 34 of the 41 planned patients have been enroled. After a median follow-up of 25 months, ORR-6 and PFS-6 were 29.4% and 47.1%, respectively. Median OS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6–24.2). Seven patients (20.6%) discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicities (hypertension, proteinuria, colonic perforation). Grade 3–4 toxicities were reported in 82% patients, the most common being haematologic toxicities and hypertension. Two patients experienced grade 5 toxicity (subdural haematoma related to bevacizumab and encephalopathy of unknown origin). ConclusionOur study showed no benefit for bevacizumab added to chemotherapy in metastatic RMC and CDC with higher than expected toxicity. Consequently, GC regimen remains a therapeutic option for RMC/CDC patients.

Abstract P1-03-04: Visceral fat area as a predictive factor in metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab

Abstract Background Obesity has previously been correlated with poorer survival in both early and metastatic breast cancer. Adipose tissues release proangiogenic factors such as Insulin-like Growth Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor that may ultimately promote tumor growth. CTscan can be used to measure the visceral fat area (VFA) and the subcutaneous fat area (SFA) on the same section. High VFA has been shown to independently predict poorer outcome in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The prospective multicenter COMET trial included metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as fist-line chemotherapy. This study was designed to identify and validate reliable factors to predict benefit of bevacizumab and allow for a more personalized use of this antiangiogenic agent. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of BMI (Body Mass Index), VFA and SFA in the COMET cohort and their impact on the quality of life. Patients and Methods Out of the 510 patients included in the COMET trial from 9/2012 to 3/2016, 480 received bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment and 360 had available CTscan data. VFA and SFA were measured retrospectively on the CTscans performed before chemotherapy initiation, at the level of the umbilicus with the patient in the supine position. ImageJ software was used to measure pixels with densities in the -190 HU to -30 HU range in order to delineate the subcutaneous and visceral compartments and to compute the cross-sectional area of each in cm2. These measurements were performed by a radiologist blinded to patients’ characteristics and outcomes. For VFA and SFA, we used a threshold at the median value. VFA and SFA levels were tested for their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact on quality of life was based on the Global Health Status, the Physical functioning, the Emotional functioning, Fatigue and Pain scores. Results The mean age at inclusion was 57 years (range: 28-83). At initial diagnosis, the main histological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 247, 80.7%). Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 245, 68.1%) and a large majority (95.4%) had less than 3 metastatic sites. One hundred and forty patients (46.7%) had histological grade II and 41% had grade III tumors. The majority of the patients had positive hormone receptor tumor (n = 238, 79.3 %) and 62 (20.7%) had triple-negative tumor subtype. The median BMI was 24.7 (range : 17-46). After a median follow-up of 60.6 months (95%CI, 60-61.3), median PFS was 9.5 months (95CI, 8.6-10.3). There was no significant correlation between BMI (p = 0.69), VFA (p = 0.24) or SFA (p = 0.58) and PFS in the univariate analysis. The median OS was 29.6 months (95CI, 25.9-32.4). BMI, VFA and SFA were not correlated with OS. Out of the 360 patients, 328 had available data regarding the quality of life. There was no impact of the VFA or the SFA on the different quality of life scores. Conclusions In our prospective cohort of 360 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment, high VFA or high SFA were not associated with a poorer survival. VFA and SFA had no impact on quality of life. Citation Format: Séverine Guiu, Boris Guiu, Marion Chevrier, Oumar Billa, Christelle Levy, Olivier Trédan, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marc Debled, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Jouannaud, Anthony Gonçalves, Maria Rios, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Frédérique Berger, Fatima-Zohra TOUMI, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Sophie Gourgou. Visceral fat area as a predictive factor in metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-04.

Second-line bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

157 Background: There is a rarity of evidence for retreatment with oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), especially in combination with bevacizumab. This is a retrospective study of second line bevacizumab (Bev) plus FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with age older than 18 and histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer treated with second line bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in a single institute between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. History of previous adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with metachronous metastatic colorectal cancer was analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the second line treatment were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients pretreated with adjuvant oxaliplatin (ReOx) and oxaliplatin-naive patients (control) with the log rank test. Results: A total of 72 patients were included. 23 patients (ReOx) were pretreated with adjuvant oxaliplatin and 49 patients (control) were oxaliplatin-naive before the second line treatment. There was a tendency of younger age in the ReOx group, but not statistically significant. Liver metastasis was significantly more frequent in the control group. The median PFS and OS in the ReOx group and the control group were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.67–21.50) versus 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.23–8.20, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84), and 10.5 months (95% CI, 5.40–30.37) versus 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.00–14.9, HR = 1.01) respectively. There was no significant difference of PFS ( p= 0.523) and OS ( p= 0.9745) between two groups. Conclusions: This study suggests a potential survival benefit of bevacizumab plus FOLFOX for mCRC patients previously treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing treatment comparable to oxaliplatin-naive patients. [Table: see text]

High serum IL-6 correlates with reduced clinical benefit of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

We elucidated the clinical and immunologic implications of serum IL-6 levels in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Ate/Bev). We prospectively enrolled 165 patients with unresectable HCC (discovery cohort: 84 patients from three centres; validation cohort: 81 patients from one centre). Baseline blood samples were analysed using a flow cytometric bead array. The tumour immune microenvironment was analysed using RNA sequencing. In the discovery cohort, clinical benefit 6 months (CB6m) was defined as complete or partial response, or stable disease for ≥6 months. Among various blood-based biomarkers, serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in participants without CB6m than in those with CB6m (mean 11.56 vs. 5.05pg/ml, p= 0.02). Using maximally selected rank statistics, the optimal cut-off value for high IL-6 was determined as 18.49pg/ml, and 15.2% of participants were found to have high IL-6 levels at baseline. In both the discovery and validation cohorts, participants with high baseline IL-6 levels had a reduced response rate and worse progression-free and overall survival after Ate/Bev treatment compared with those with low baseline IL-6 levels. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the clinical implications of high IL-6 levels persisted, even after adjusting for various confounding factors. Participants with high IL-6 levels showed reduced interferon-γ and tumour necrosis factor-α secretion from CD8+ T cells. Moreover, excess IL-6 suppressed cytokine production and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. Finally, participants with high IL-6 levels exhibited a non-T-cell-inflamed immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. High baseline IL-6 levels can be associated with poor clinical outcomes and impaired T-cell function in patients with unresectable HCC after Ate/Bev treatment. Although patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who respond to treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab exhibit favourable clinical outcomes, a fraction of these still experience primary resistance. We found that high baseline serum levels of IL-6 correlate with poor clinical outcomes and impaired T-cell response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab.