Belatacept-based Immunosuppression Research Articles

Disseminated Histoplasmosis with Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in a Renal Transplant Recipient on Belatacept-based Immunosuppression

Effective post-transplant immunosuppression is essential to induce tolerance to allogeneic tissues and promote long-term graft survival. However, suppression of the immune system significantly increases the risk of opportunistic infections. In addition to the ongoing challenge of balancing graft survival and preventing infections, previous gold-standard calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression also posed an increased risk of nephrotoxicity, cardiac disease, and diabetes. Belatacept is approved as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Although belatacept has improved cardiovascular and metabolic adverse events in renal transplant patients’ but it carries a notably higher risk of long-term graft survival and renal toxicity, similar to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. However, there may be an increased risk of infections with its mechanism of action. We present a case of a 62-year-old female who developed disseminated histoplasmosis 18 months after being on belatacept-based immunosuppression after a deceased donor renal transplant for end-stage renal disease secondary to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Grocott Methenamine Stain (GMS) of peripheral blood smear showed intracellular yeast in neutrophils, consistent with histoplasmosis. Disseminated histoplasmosis was confirmed with positive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and urine culture. The patient later developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) secondary to immunosuppression and disseminated histoplasmosis. The patient succumbed to the disease despite maximal medical therapy. To our knowledge, there is one other published report of disseminated histoplasmosis in a patient with belatacept-based immunosuppression. The unique feature of this case is the development of HLH secondary to disseminated histoplasmosis while on belatacept. Further research is needed to evaluate the need for antifungal prophylaxis in patients on belatacept therapy.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression does not confer increased risk of BK polyomavirus-DNAemia relative to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

The effect of belatacept on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) control remains largely unknown. This is a propensity matched retrospective cohort study in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR) transplanted between 2016-2020 who received a belatacept- versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen. A continuous time multi-state Markov model was used to evaluate BKPyV replication dynamics (BKPyV-dyn). Three BKPyV-dyn states were defined: BKPyV-dyn1 (viral load <3 log10), BKPyV-dyn2 (viral load ≥ 3 log10 and ≤4 log10), and BKPyV-dyn3 (viral load >4 log10). Two hundred eighty KTR on belatacept- and 280 KTR on tacrolimus-based regimens were compared. The probability of transitioning between BKPyV-dyn states and time spent in each state in both groups was comparable. Total duration in BKPyV-dyn-1 was 632.1 days (95% CI 612.1, 648.5) for belatacept versus 615.2 days (95% CI 592.5, 635.8) for tacrolimus, BKPyV-dyn-2 was 49.2 days (95% CI 41.3, 58.4) for belatacept versus 55.6 days (95% CI 46.5, 66.8) for tacrolimus, and BKPyV-dyn-3 was 48.7 days (95% CI 37.1, 363.1) for belatacept versus 59.2 days (95% CI 45.8, 73.5) for tacrolimus. BKPyV associated nephropathy (PyVAN) occurred in 3.9% in belatacept- and 3.9% tacrolimus-treated KRT (P >.9). Compared with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, belatacept based immunosuppression was not associated with increased risk of BKPyV-DNAemia or nephropathy.

(624) - Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression Regimen Can Stabilize Allograft Function in Patients with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

(624) - Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression Regimen Can Stabilize Allograft Function in Patients with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Long-Term Outcomes after Conversion to a Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Conversion to a belatacept-based immunosuppression is currently used as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance strategy when the CNI-based standard-of-care immunosuppression is not tolerated after kidney transplantation. However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term benefit and safety after conversion to belatacept. We prospectively enrolled 311 kidney transplant recipients from 2007 to 2020 from two referral centers, converted from CNI to belatacept after transplant according to a prespecified protocol. Patients were matched at the time of conversion to patients maintained with CNIs, using optimal matching. The primary end point was death-censored allograft survival at 7 years. The secondary end points were patient survival, eGFR, and safety outcomes, including serious viral infections, immune-related complications, antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell-mediated rejection, de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibody, de novo diabetes, cardiovascular events, and oncologic complications. A total of 243 patients converted to belatacept (belatacept group) were matched to 243 patients maintained on CNIs (CNI control group). All recipient, transplant, functional, histologic, and immunologic parameters were well balanced between the two groups with a standardized mean difference below 0.05. At 7 years post-conversion to belatacept, allograft survival was 78% compared with 63% in the CNI control group ( P < 0.001 for log-rank test). The safety outcomes showed a similar rate of patient death (28% in the belatacept group versus 36% in the CNI control group), active antibody-mediated rejection (6% versus 7%), T-cell-mediated rejection (4% versus 4%), major adverse cardiovascular events, and cancer occurrence (9% versus 11%). A significantly higher rate of de novo proteinuria was observed in the belatacept group as compared with the CNI control group (37% versus 21%, P < 0.001). This real-world evidence study shows that conversion to belatacept post-transplant was associated with lower risk of graft failure and acceptable safety outcomes compared with patients maintained on CNIs. Long-term Outcomes after Conversion to Belatacept, NCT04733131 .

Obesity is associated with a higher incidence of rejection in patients on belatacept: A pooled analysis from the BENEFIT/BENEFIT-EXT clinical trials

Though belatacept is administered with a weight-based dosing schema, there has been higher clearance reported in obese patients. Therefore, we evaluated the association between body mass index (BMI) and transplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients who were randomized to cyclosporine- or belatacept-based immunosuppression in the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT randomized clinical trials. A total of 666 and 543 patients underwent randomization and transplantation in BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, respectively, of which 1056 had complete data and were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped categorically according to BMI: <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30 kg/m2. BMI did influence both the incidence and severity of acute rejection. Obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 in the low intensity belatacept group experienced significantly more rejection at 12 months than did patients with BMI <25 kg/m2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2. In both the moderate intensity belatacept and low intensity belatacept groups, obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 experienced significantly more severe acute rejection than did patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2. These results suggest that obese kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk for acute rejection when under belatacept-based immunosuppression when compared to nonobese patients.

Early conversion to belatacept-based immunosuppression regimen promotes improved long-term renal graft function in kidney transplant recipients

BackgroundBelatacept has been demonstrated as an effective alternative immunosuppressant in kidney transplant recipients. This study focuses on outcomes of early and late conversion to Belatacept-based immunosuppression after kidney transplant. Materials and methodsThis retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database included all adult kidney transplants patients at SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital from 1 January 2014 to 30 December 2022. Early conversion was defined as all conversions done at <6 months after kidney transplantation, and late conversion to belatacept was defined as conversion at >6 months after kidney transplantation. ResultsOut of 61 patients included in this study, 33 patients (54%) were in the early conversion group, and 28 patients (46%) were in the late conversion group. The mean eGFR in the early conversion group was 26.73 ± 16.26 ml/min/1.73 m2 before conversion to belatacept, which improved to 45.3 ± 21.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 at one-year post-conversion (p = 0.0006). Furthermore, eGFR changes in the late conversion group were insignificant, with 46.30 ± 15.65 ml/min/1.73 m2 before conversion to belatacept, and 44.76 ± 22.91 ml/min/1.73 m2 after one year of follow-up (p = 0.72). All four biopsy-proven allograft rejections in the early conversion group were acute T-cell-mediated rejections (ATMR). In the late conversion group, out of three biopsy-proven rejections, one was chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), one was ATMR, and one was mixed ATMR/CAMR. All four patients with ATMR rejection received mycophenolic acid (MPA) as part of their immunosuppressive regimen, and none received tacrolimus. The one-year post-conversion allograft survival rate in early and late conversion groups was 100%. However, the one-year post-conversion patient survival rate was 90.9% in the early conversion group and 100% in the late conversion group (P = 0.11). ConclusionsEarly post-transplant conversion to belatacept can improve the eGFR more meaningful when compared to late conversion. Patients who receive belatacept and MPA rather than tacrolimus may have increased rates of T-cell-mediated rejection.

(549) Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients: National Trends with Outcomes from a Single Center

(549) Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients: National Trends with Outcomes from a Single Center

Conversion to belatacept after lung transplantation: Report of 10 cases.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remain the cornerstone of maintenance immunosuppression (IS) after lung transplantation (LTx), although CNI-related life-threatening toxic effects may occur. Belatacept, a novel immunosuppressant that blocks a T-cell co-stimulation pathway, is a non-nephrotoxic drug indicated as an alternative to CNIs in kidney Tx. In LTx, there are only a few reports of belatacept conversion as a CNI-free or CNI-sparing IS treatment. We reviewed a series of 10 LTx recipients with conversion to a CNI-free belatacept IS regimen within the first year post-LTx (n = 7) or a belatacept/low-dose CNI combination after the first year (n = 3). Use of belatacept was triggered by severe renal failure in 9 patients and under-IS with previous other IS-related toxicities in 1 patient. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate after starting belatacept significantly improved at 6 months after initiation and at the last-follow-up (p = 0.006, and p = 0.002 respectively). The incidence of recurrent and/or severe acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes was high in patients with CNI-free belatacept-based IS (n = 4/7). Chronic graft allograft dysfunction developed in 2 of 9 recipients under belatacept IS. Belatacept was stopped in 6 patients because of recurrent/severe ACR (n = 3), recurrent opportunistic infections (n = 1), center modified policy (n = 1), or other cause (n = 1). Early conversion to CNI-free belatacept-based IS improved renal function in this series but was counterbalanced by a high incidence of recurrent ACR, including life-threatening episodes. Other studies are needed to better determine the indications for its use after LTx, possibly with lower immunological risk IS regimens, such as CNI-sparing belatacept.

TIGIT agonism alleviates costimulation blockade-resistant rejection in a regulatory T cell-dependent manner.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation confers fewer off-target toxicities than calcineurin inhibitors but comes at a cost of increased incidence and severity of acute rejection, potentially due to its deleterious effect on both the number and function of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). TIGIT is a CD28 family coinhibitory receptor expressed on several subsets of immune cells including Tregs. We hypothesized that coinhibition through TIGIT signaling could function to ameliorate costimulation blockade-resistant rejection. The results demonstrate that treatment with an agonistic anti-TIGIT antibody, when combined with costimulation blockade by CTLA-4Ig, can prolong allograft survival in a murine skin graft model compared with CTLA-4Ig alone. Further, this prolongation of graft survival is accompanied by an increase in the frequency and number of graft-infiltrating Tregs and a concomitant reduction in the number of CD8+ T cells in the graft. Through the use of Treg-specific TIGIT conditional knockout animals, we demonstrated that the TIGIT-mediated reduction in the graft-infiltrating CD8+ T cell response is dependent on signaling of TIGIT on Foxp3+ Tregs. Our results highlight both the key functional role of TIGIT on Foxp3+ Tregs under conditions in which CTLA-4 is blocked and the therapeutic potential of TIGIT agonism to optimize costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression.

Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression Controls the Post-Transplant Humoral Immune Response in Highly Sensitized Nonhuman Primates.

Preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to MHC antigens increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized transplant recipients and reduces graft survival. Pretransplant desensitization with costimulation blockade and proteasome inhibition has facilitated transplantation in our preclinical nonhuman primate (NHP) model. However, long-term graft survival is limited by rebound of DSA after transplantation. In this study, we performed kidney transplants between highly sensitized, maximally MHC-mismatched NHPs (n=14). At kidney transplantation, primates received T cell depletion with rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin (rhATG; n=10) or monoclonal anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies (n=4). Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of belatacept and tacrolimus (n=5) or belatacept and rapamycin (n=9) with steroids. Rebound of DSA post-kidney transplantation was significantly reduced compared with maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Protocol lymph node biopsy specimens showed a decrease in germinal center activity, with low frequencies of T follicular helper cells and class-switched B cells after kidney transplantation. Combined belatacept and rapamycin was superior in controlling viral reactivation, enabling weaning of ganciclovir prophylaxis. Tacrolimus was associated with increased morbidity that included cytomegalovirus and parvovirus viremia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. All primates in the tacrolimus/belatacept group failed discontinuation of antiviral therapy. Overall, belatacept-based immunosuppression increased AMR-free graft survival by controlling post-transplant humoral responses in highly sensitized NHP recipients and should be further investigated in a human clinical trial.

A pilot randomized controlled trial of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression following anti-thymocyte globulin induction in lung transplantation

The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after lung transplantation is common and results in adverse outcomes. In kidney transplantation, Belatacept has been associated with a lower incidence of DSA, but experience with Belatacept in lung transplantation is limited. We conducted a two-center pilot randomized controlled trial of de novo immunosuppression with Belatacept after lung transplantation to assess the feasibility of conducting a pivotal trial. Twenty-seven participants were randomized to Control (Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and prednisone, n= 14) or Belatacept-based immunosuppression (Tacrolimus, Belatacept, and prednisone until day 89 followed by Belatacept, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and prednisone, n= 13). All participants were treated with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin for induction immunosuppression. We permanently stopped randomization and treatment with Belatacept after three participants in the Belatacept arm died compared to none in the Control arm. Subsequently, two additional participants in the Belatacept arm died for a total of five deaths compared to none in the Control arm (log rank p= .016). We did not detect a significant difference in DSA development, acute cellular rejection, or infection between the two groups. We conclude that the investigational regimen used in this study is associated with increased mortality after lung transplantation.

Belatacept Conversion in Kidney After Liver Transplantation.

Background.Costimulatory blockade with belatacept has demonstrated long-term benefits in renal transplantation, but de novo use in liver transplant recipients has resulted in increased rejection, graft loss, and death. However, belatacept conversion as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance strategy has not been studied and may be of benefit in liver transplantation where CNI-induced renal dysfunction and toxicity are barriers to improved outcomes.Methods.Using clinical data extracted from our institutional medical record, we report on 8 patients who underwent kidney after liver transplantation and were treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression and transient CNI therapy.Results.All patients tolerated belatacept therapy without any patient deaths or graft losses. No episodes of rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody formation, or major systemic infections were observed, and all patients demonstrated preserved liver and excellent renal allograft function. Patients received belatacept for a median duration of 13.2 mo, and at a median follow-up of 15.9 mo post–kidney transplant, 6 of 8 patients continued on belatacept with 3 completely off and 3 poised to transition off CNI.Conclusions.These findings are the first evidence that in liver transplant recipients requiring subsequent kidney transplantation, belatacept-based therapy can potentially facilitate CNI-free maintenance immunosuppression. This supports the possibility of belatacept conversion in stand-alone liver transplant recipients as a viable method of CNI avoidance.

Belatacept Conversion Protocols and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundConversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression has become common; however, numerous protocols have emerged in lieu of a standardized protocol. The purpose of this study was to characterize belatacept conversion protocols from multiple centers and observe outcomes. MethodsThis was a retrospective study that included Kaiser Permanente Southern California members. The primary outcome was rejection 6 months after conversion and secondary outcomes included change in serum creatinine and graft loss. ResultsSeventy-eight patients were included. Thirteen distinct protocols were identified from 8 different transplant centers. Protocols varied by initial dose, induction schedule, and CNI taper. The observed rate of rejection was 6%. There was a trend toward an association of rejection with lower tacrolimus exposure at the time of conversion and lower mycophenolic acid dosing postconversion. Graft survival was 88% and patient survival was 94%. There was a significant improvement in creatinine after conversion. Those with early conversions and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL at the time of conversion had the best response. ConclusionsA large variety of belatacept conversion protocols were identified. Protocols were defined by the initial dose, induction regimen, and CNI taper. Rejection rates were low and may be influenced by exposure to maintenance immunosuppression during and after conversion. Most patients showed stabilization and improvement in creatinine postconversion, with the largest effect in those with an early conversion and serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL.

Optimization of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression administered to renal transplant recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept‐based maintenance immunosuppression present with a more favorable metabolic profile, reduced incidence of de novo donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs), and improved renal function and long‐term patient/graft survival relative to individuals receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression. However, the rates and severity of acute rejection (AR) are greater with the approved belatacept‐based regimen than with CNI‐based immunosuppression. Although these early co‐stimulation blockade‐resistant rejections are typically steroid sensitive, the higher rate of cellular AR has led many transplant centers to adopt immunosuppressive regimens that differ from the approved label. This article summarizes the available data on these alternative de novo belatacept‐based maintenance regimens. Steroid‐sparing, belatacept‐based immunosuppression (following T cell–depleting induction therapy) has been shown to yield AR rates comparable to those seen with CNI‐based regimens. Concomitant treatment with belatacept plus a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi; sirolimus or everolimus) has yielded AR rates ranging from 0 to 4%. Because the optimal induction agent and number of induction doses; blood levels of mTORi; and dose, duration, and use of corticosteroids have yet to be determined, larger prospective clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal alternative belatacept‐based regimen for minimizing early cellular AR occurrence.

Prevention of acute rejection after rescue with Belatacept by association of low-dose Tacrolimus maintenance in medically complex kidney transplant recipients with early or late graft dysfunction.

Increased acute rejection risk in rescue protocols with Belatacept may limit its use particularly in medically complex patients where preexisting increased risk of rejection couples with CNI toxicity. Retrospective analysis was performed in 19 KTs shifted to a Belatacept-based immunosuppression with low-dose Tacrolimus (2-3 ng/mL) after evidence of allograft disfunction, including patients with primary non-function (PNF), chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR), history of previous KTs and/or other concomitant transplants (liver, pancreas). Evaluation of CD28+ CD4+ effector memory T cell (TEM) before conversion was performed in 10/19. Kidney function significantly improved (median eGFR 16.5 ml/min/1.73m2 before vs 25 ml/min after; p = 0.001) at a median time after conversion of 12.5 months (9.1-17.8). Overall graft and patient survival were 89.5% and 100% respectively. Definitive weaning from dialysis in 5/5 KTs with PNF was observed, whereas 7/8 patients lost their graft within first year in a control group. eGFR significantly ameliorated in re-trasplants (p = 0.001) and stabilized in KTs with other organ transplants or cAMR. No acute rejection episodes occurred, despite the significant risk suggested by high frequency of CD28+ CD4+ TEM in most patients. Opportunistic infections were limited and most common in early vs late-converted. Rescue association of Belatacept with low-dose Tacrolimus in medically complex KTs is a feasible option that allows prevention of acute rejection and amelioration of graft function.

Microvascular inflammation is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients with very late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept

BackgroundIn de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treatment with belatacept has been established as a comparable option as maintenance immunosuppression, preferably as a strategy to convert from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Switch to belatacept demonstrated improved renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, but risk of transplant rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are still a matter of debate. Only few data are available in patients at increased immunological risk and late after transplantation.MethodsWe analyzed 30 long-term KTR (including 2 combined pancreas-KTR) converted from CNI to belatacept > 60 months after transplantation with moderate to severe graft dysfunction (GFR ≤ 45 mL/min). Biopsies were classified according to the Banff 2015 criteria. Group differences were assessed in a univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U or Chi square test, respectively. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment failure was performed using a binary logistic regression model including significant predictors from univariate analysis. Fifty-six KTR matched for donor and recipient characteristics were used as a control cohort remaining under CNI-treatment.ResultsPatient survival in belatacept cohort at 12/24 months was 96.7%/90%, overall graft survival was 76.7 and 60.0%, while graft survival censored for death was 79.3%/66.7%. In patients with functioning grafts, median GFR improved from 22.5 mL/min to 24.5 mL/min at 24 months. Positivity for DSA at conversion was 46.7%. From univariate analysis of risk factors for graft loss, GFR < 25 mL/min (p = 0.042) and Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) sum score ≥ 2 (p = 0.023) at conversion were significant at 24 months. In the analysis of risk factors for treatment failure, a MVI sum score ≥ 2 was significant univariately (p = 0.023) and in a bivariate (p = 0.037) logistic regression at 12 months. DSA-positivity was neither associated with graft loss nor treatment failure. The control cohort had comparable graft survival outcomes at 24 months, albeit without increase of mean GFR in patients with functioning grafts (ΔGFR of − 3.6 ± 8.5 mL/min).ConclusionRescue therapy with conversion to belatacept is feasible in patients with worsening renal function, even many years after transplantation. The benefit in patients with MVI and severe GFR impairment remains to be investigated.

Differential effects of Belatacept on virus-specific memory versus de novo allo-specific T cell responses of kidney transplant recipients and healthy donors

Belatacept, Nulojix®, inhibits the interaction of CD28 on naïve T cells with B7.1/B7.2 (CD80/86) on antigen presenting cells, leading to T cell hyporesponsiveness and anergy and is approved as immunosuppressive drug in kidney transplantation. Due to its specificity for B7.1/2 molecules, side effects are reduced compared to other immunosuppressive drugs like calcineurin- and mTOR-inhibitors. Kidney transplant recipients under Belatacept-based immunosuppression presented with superior renal function and similar graft survival seven years after transplantation compared to cyclosporine treatment. However, de novo Belatacept-based immunosuppression was associated with increased risk of early rejections and viral (EBV) infections in clinical trials, especially in EBV-naïve patients. Since there is no vaccination against EBV infection available, EBV-derived virus like particles (EBV-VLPs) are currently developed as vaccine strategy. Here, we investigated the immunosuppressive effects of Belatacept compared to calcineurin- and mTOR inhibitors on allo- versus virus-specific T cells and the potency of EBV-VLPs to induce virus-specific T cell responses in vitro. Using PBMC of kidney recipients and healthy donors, we could demonstrate selective inhibition of allo-specific de novo T cell responses but not virus-specific memory T cell responses by Belatacept, as measured by IFN-γ production. In contrast, calcineurin inhibitors suppressed IFN-γ production of virus-specific memory CD8+ T cells completely. These results experimentally confirm the concept that Belatacept blocks CD28-mediated costimulation in newly primed naïve T cells but does not interfere with memory T cell responses being already independent from CD28-mediated costimulation. Additionally, we could show that EBV-VLPs induce a significant though weak IFN-γ-mediated T cell response in vitro in both kidney recipients and healthy donors. In summary, we demonstrated that immunosuppression of kidney recipients by Belatacept may primarily suppress de novo allo-specific T cell responses sparing virus-specific memory T cells. Moreover, EBV-VLPs could represent a novel strategy for vaccination of immunocompromised renal transplant recipients to prevent EBV reactivation especially under Belatacept-based immunosuppression.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression with simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and early corticosteroid withdrawal: A prospective, randomized multicenter trial.

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus-based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-calculated eGFR of <45mL/min/1.73m2 at 12months. Results are reported by treatment group (alemtuzumab/belatacept, rATG/belatacept, and rATG/tacrolimus). Superiority was not observed at 1year for the primary endpoint (9/107 [8.4%], 15/104 [14.4%], and 14/105 [13.3%], respectively; P=NS) for either belatacept-based regimen. Differences were not observed for secondary endpoints (death, death-censored graft loss, or estimated glomerular filtration rates<45mL/min/1.73m2 ). Differences were observed in biopsy-proved acute cellular rejection (10.3%, 18.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) (P<.001), but not in antibody-mediated rejection, mixed acute rejection, or de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Neurologic and electrolyte abnormality adverse events were less frequent under belatacept. Belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens did not prove to be superior for the primary or secondary endpoints. Belatacept-treated patients demonstrated an increase in biopsy-proved acute cellular rejection and reduced neurologic and metabolic adverse events. These results demonstrate that simultaneous CNIA/ESW is feasible without excessive acute rejection.

Late Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Belatacept in Kidney-Transplant Recipients Has a Significant Beneficial Impact on Glycemic Parameters.

Background.Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroids are strongly associated with new-onset diabetes after transplantation, worsening of pre-existing diabetes, and cardiovascular events. We assessed the benefit of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression in diabetic kidney-transplant (KT) recipients on glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors.Methods.In this retrospective, noncontrolled single-study conducted between May 2016 and October 26, 2018, we recruited KT recipients converted from CNIs to belatacept at least 6 months after KT. The primary endpoint was the evolution of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints included modifications to antidiabetic drugs, other cardiovascular risk factors, and renal function.Results.One hundred and three KT recipients were included. Of these, 26 (25%) had type 2 diabetes. The patients were either receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (n = 21; 75%) or insulin therapy (n = 14; 54%). Overall HbA1c decreased significantly from 6.2 ± 1 to 5.8 ± 1%, P < 0.001. In diabetic patients, HbA1c decreased from 7.2 ± 1 to 6.5 ± 1%, P = 0.001. HbA1c significantly decreased in the subgroup of patients with new-onset diabetes after transplantation and whether diabetes was controlled at inclusion or not (ie, HA1c ≤7% or >7%). Moreover, no diabetic patient increased the number of oral antidiabetic drugs and the dose of basal insulin was not statistically different from baseline to 6 months (16 international unit at baseline and 16 international unit at 6 mo, P = 1). One patient had to start treatment by insulin pump. During follow-up, the renal function, body mass index, and hemoglobin level of all 103 patients remained stable, 2 patients presented acute cellular rejection, and no patient suffered from graft loss.Conclusions.A late switch from CNI to belatacept was a valuable therapeutic option for diabetic kidney recipients and substantially improved glycemic parameters.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression: A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen in heart transplant recipients.

Belatacept (BTC) is indicated for prophylaxis of graft rejection in adults receiving a renal transplant (Tx). This retrospective observational study (three centers) included all heart transplant recipients receiving BTC between January 2014 and October 2018. Forty EBV+ patients mean GFR 35±20mL/min/m2 were identified, among whom belatacept was initiated during the first 3months after transplantation in 12 patients, and later in 28 patients. Several patients were multiorgan transplant recipients. Study outcomes were GFR, safety, and changes in immunosuppressive therapy. The main reason for switching to BTC was to preserve renal function, resulting in discontinuation of CNI and changes in immunosuppressive therapy in 76% of cases. At study closeout, 24/40 patients were still on BTC therapy. GFR was improved (+59%, P=.0002*) within 1month, particularly in the early group. More episodes of rejection were observed among "late" patients (1 death). Sixteen treatment discontinuations were recorded: GFR recovery (n=4), DSA no longer detectable (n=1), compliance issues (n=3), poor venous access (n=2), multiple infections (n=1), 1 death (fungal lung infection), and treatment failure (n=4). Median follow-up was 24months. Four patients developed de novo DSA (MFI<1500). BTC is an effective alternative immunosuppressive for postoperative transient kidney failure, stabilizing delayed renal function, with acceptable safety profile under careful monitoring.