Belantamab Mafodotin Research Articles

Strengths and Weaknesses of Different Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Progress After the Frontline Use of Lenalidomide: A Narrative Review

Background/Objectives: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after exposure to lenalidomide in the context of their first-line therapy are becoming a growing and clinically relevant population. We performed a systematic review of available clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse after the frontline use of lenalidomide. Methods: Publications of interest were searched on the PubMed database. The following search terms were employed: relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, first relapse, second-line therapy, lenalidomide-refractory (Len-R) and lenalidomide-exposed (Len-Exp). Results: Overall, triplet regimens that included anti-CD38 antibodies, carfilzomib and dexamethasone achieved a more favorable PFS regardless of the number of prior therapies. Other trials also demonstrated a non-negligible benefit with combinations containing pomalidomide, particularly in early lines of therapy. However, the variable number of patients with Len-Exp/Len-R disease enrolled in these studies and the limited number of those analyzed after progression following frontline lenalidomide make it difficult to select an “optimal” choice for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse. Promising results have been more recently obtained by using combo therapies, including belantamab mafodotin and, above all, immunotherapies with CAR-T cells, and ongoing clinical trials are exploring the role of bispecific antibodies and CELMoDs in this population of patients. Conclusions: In the absence of clear-cut data regarding the specific effects of available regimens on patients with MM who are refractory or have relapsed after first-line therapies including lenalidomide, novel approaches based on different types of immune strategies are expected to further improve the clinical outcome of these patients.

Belantamab mafodotin monotherapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a real-world observational study in the United States.

Not available.

Belantamab Mafodotin in Relapsed/Refractory AL Amyloidosis: Real-World Multi-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

Introduction: Treatment for relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis (AL) is an unmet need. The safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin (BLM) in multiple myeloma are known, whereas in AL data are limited. Methods: We report a multi-center cohort of AL patients receiving BLM, and review all previous data on BLM therapy in AL. Results: Twelve patients with a median of 3 (range 2–9) prior lines of therapy were included. The overall hematological response rate (ORR) was 75% (9/12), including 5 complete responses. Six of the 10 evaluable patients had organ responses. The median event-free survivals/overall survivals were 22.3 and 28.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 toxicities were mostly infections and keratopathy, occurring in 7/12 (58%). Hematological toxicities were rare. No grade 4/5 toxicities occurred. The review of the previous series reveals BLM provides an ORR of 60–83% with similar rates of corneal toxicity. Conclusion: BLM, being an off-the-shelf therapy, with acceptable toxicity even in frail patients, may be a valuable option in AL, with a high ORR, and a signal for durable responses and high-quality organ responses.

Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events with Monoclonal Antibodies Approved for Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Background/Objectives: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. However, post-marketing data on their neuropsychiatric safety are limited. This study aimed to evaluate neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) related to mAbs used for MM through a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2015 to 2023 with at least one neuropsychiatric AE and one of the MM-approved mAbs as the suspected drug (i.e., daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab, belantamab mafodotin, teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquentamab) were analyzed using descriptive and disproportionality approaches. Results: Unknown signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) included the following: cerebral infarction for daratumumab (n = 45; reporting odds ratio (ROR) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.79-3.21; information component (IC) = 1.54, IC025-IC075 = 1.05-1.9), elotuzumab (25; 7.61, 5.13-11.28; 3.03, 2.37-3.51), and isatuximab (10; 2.56, 1.38-4.76; 1.67, 0.59-2.4); mental status changes for daratumumab (40; 2.66, 1.95-3.63; 1.67, 1.14-2.04) and belantamab mafodotin (10; 4.23, 2.28-7.88; 2.3, 1.22-3.03); an altered state of consciousness for daratumumab (32; 1.97, 1.39-2.78; 1.32, 0.73-1.74) and belantamab mafodotin (6; 2.35, 1.05-5.23; 1.6, 0.19-2.52); Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) for daratumumab (23; 6.42, 4.26-9.69; 2.81, 2.11-3.3), isatuximab (8; 10.72, 5.35-21.48; 3.57, 2.35-4.37), and elotuzumab (3; 4.74, 1.53-14.7; 2.59, 0.52-3.8); and orthostatic intolerance for daratumumab (10; 12.54, 6.71-23.43; 3.75, 2.67-4.48) and elotuzumab (4; 28.31, 10.58-75.73; 5, 3.24-6.08). Conclusions: Our analysis highlighted several previously unacknowledged SDRs for MM-approved mAbs. Given the complex and not entirely understood etiology of some neuropsychiatric AEs, including GBS, further investigations are necessary.

Preclinical Evaluation of STI-8811, a Novel Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting BCMA for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

Treatment for patients with multiple myeloma has experienced rapid development and improvement in recent years; however, patients continue to experience relapse, and multiple myeloma remains largely incurable. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has been widely recognized as a promising target for treatment of multiple myeloma due to its exclusive expression in B-cell linage cells and its critical role in the growth and survival of malignant plasma cells. Here, we introduce STI-8811, a BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) linked to an auristatin-derived duostatin payload via an enzymatically cleavable peptide linker, using our proprietary C-lock technology. STI-8811 exhibits target-specific binding activity and rapid internalization, leading to G2/M cell-cycle arrest, caspase 3/7 activation, and apoptosis in BCMA-expressing tumor cells in vitro. Soluble BCMA (sBCMA) is shed by multiple myeloma cells into the blood and increases with disease progression, competing for ADC binding and reducing its efficacy. We report enhanced cytotoxic activity in the presence of high levels of sBCMA compared with a belantamab mafodotin biosimilar (J6M0-mcMMAF). STI-8811 demonstrated greater in vivo activity than J6M0-mcMMAF in solid and disseminated multiple myeloma models, including tumor models with low BCMA expression and/or in large solid tumors representing soft-tissue plasmacytomas. In cynomolgus monkeys, STI-8811 was well tolerated, with toxicities consistent with other BCMA-targeting ADCs with auristatin payloads in clinical studies. STI-8811 has the potential to outperform current clinical candidates with lower toxicity and higher activity under conditions found in patients with advanced disease. Significance: STI-8811 is a BCMA-targeting ADC carrying a potent auristatin derivative. We report unique binding properties which maintain potent cytotoxic activity under sBCMA-high conditions that hinder the clinical efficacy of current BCMA-targeting ADC candidates. Beyond disseminated models of multiple myeloma, we observed efficacy in solid tumor models of plasmacytomas with low and heterogenous BCMA expressions at a magnitude and duration of response exceeding that of clinical comparators.

Drug-Related Keratitis: A Real-World FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database Study.

This study aimed to assess the drug risk of drug-related keratitis and track the epidemiological characteristics of drug-related keratitis. This study analyzed data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 2004 to December 2023. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess drug-related keratitis with positive signals, and drugs were classified and assessed with regard to their drug-induced timing and risk of drug-related keratitis. A total of 1606 drugs were reported to pose a risk of drug-related keratitis in the FAERS database, and, after disproportionality analysis and screening, 17 drugs were found to significantly increase the risk of drug-related keratitis. Among them, seven were ophthalmic medications, including dorzolamide (reporting odds ratio [ROR] = 3695.82), travoprost (ROR = 2287.27), and brimonidine (ROR = 2118.52), and 10 were non-ophthalmic medications, including tralokinumab (ROR = 2609.12), trazodone (ROR = 2377.07), and belantamab mafodotin (ROR = 680.28). The top three drugs having the highest risk of drug-related keratitis were dorzolamide (Bayesian confidence propagation neural network [BCPNN] = 11.71), trazodone (BCPNN = 11.11), and tralokinumab (BCPNN = 11.08). The drug-induced times for non-ophthalmic medications were significantly shorter than those for ophthalmic medications (mean days, 141.02 vs. 321.96, respectively; P < 0.001). The incidence of drug-related keratitis reached its peak in 2023. Prevention of drug-related keratitis is more important than treatment. Identifying the specific risks and timing of drug-induced keratitis can support the development of preventive measures. Identifying the specific drugs related to medication-related keratitis is of significant importance for drug vigilance in the occurrence of drug-related keratitis.

Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for triple class exposed/refractory relapsed multiple myeloma: a subgroup analysis of the ALGONQUIN trial

Given the early use of triplet and quadruplet regimens, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will be exposed and/or refractory to PIs, IMiDs, and anti-CD38 mAbs after first- or second-line treatment. Effective treatment for this group of triple class exposed/refractory (TCE/R) patients is crucial. Here we present a post-hoc subgroup analysis of TCE/R patients treated on the ALGONQUIN study of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone (belamaf-Pd) for relapsed MM. Of the 99 patients treated on the ALGONQUIN study, 69 were TCE and 56 were TCR and were included in this analysis. Patients had a median of three prior lines of therapy. The ORR was 86.4% in TCE patients and 84.9% in TCR patients, with ≥ very good partial response rates of 64% and 68% respectively. The median progression free survival was 18.3 months in TCE patients and 19.6 months in TCR patients, with overall survival not yet reached and 34.4 months, respectively for TCE and TCR patients. No new safety signals were identified. The most common Grade ≥ 3 AEs were keratopathy (48%), decreased visual acuity (42%), neutropenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (27%), and infection (25%). In this subgroup analysis of the ALGONQUIN study, patients with TCE/TCR disease treated with belamaf-Pd achieved high clinical response rates with durable remissions, comparable to other novel therapeutics in this space.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone and vs belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Objective Talquetamab is the first GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone (sel-dex) and vs belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) in patients with TCE RRMM. Methods An unanchored MAIC was performed using individual patient-level data from patients treated with subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW) and 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W) from MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799/NCT04636552) and published summary data for sel-dex from STORM (NCT02336815) and belamaf from DREAMM-2 (NCT0325678). Patients from MonumenTAL-1 who met key eligibility criteria for STORM and DREAMM-2 were included. Outcomes of interest were overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results After adjustment for cross-trial differences, patients treated with both dosing schedules of talquetamab showed significantly better ORR, ≥CR, and DOR vs sel-dex and significantly higher ORR and ≥ CR vs belamaf; DOR was relatively similar to belamaf. PFS was significantly improved with talquetamab Q2W and numerically in favor of talquetamab QW vs sel-dex and significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. OS was significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs sel-dex and was numerically in favor of both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. Conclusion These analyses show superior effectiveness of both talquetamab dosing schedules vs sel-dex and vs belamaf for most outcomes and highlight talquetamab as an effective treatment option for patients with TCE RRMM.

Ocular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates in oncology: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as the focus and hotspots in the cancer field, yet the accompanying ocular toxicity has often been underestimated. We aimed to comprehensively and comparatively analyze the risk of ocular toxicity associated with various ADCs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Data were extracted from the FAERS database from Q3 2011 to Q3 2023. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of ADCs-related ocular adverse events (AEs). These data were further mined by proportional analysis and Bayesian approach to detect signals of ADCs-induced ocular AEs. Moreover, the time to onset of ocular toxicity was also evaluated. A total of 1,246 cases of ocular AEs were attributed to ADCs. Ocular toxicity signals were observed in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin, brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, mirvetuximab soravtansine, sacituzumab govitecan, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and trastuzumab emtansine. Of these, belantamab mafodotin, trastuzumab emtansine, and mirvetuximab soravtansine, whose payloads are microtubule polymerization inhibitors, were more susceptible to ocular toxicity. The ten most common ADCs-related ocular AEs signals are keratopathy [ROR = 1,273.52, 95% CI (1,129.26-1,436.21)], visual acuity reduced [ROR = 22.83, 95% CI (21.2-24.58)], dry eye [ROR = 9.69, 95% CI (8.81-10.66)], night blindness [ROR = 259.87, 95% CI (228.23-295.89)], vision blurred [ROR = 1.78, 95% CI (1.57-2.02)], photophobia [ROR = 10.45, 95% CI (9.07-12.05)], foreign body sensation in eyes [ROR = 23.35, 95% CI (19.88-27.42)], ocular toxicity [ROR = 144.62, 95% CI (117.3-178.32)], punctate keratitis [ROR = 126.21, 95% CI (101.66-156.69)], eye disorder [ROR = 2.71, 95% CI (2.21-3.32)]. In terms of onset time, sacituzumab govitecan displayed an earlier onset of 21days, while trastuzumab deruxtecan exhibited the latest onset of 223days. ADCs may increase the risk of ocular toxicity in cancer patients, leading to serious mortality. With the widespread application of newly launched ADCs, combining the FAERS data with other data sources is crucial for monitoring the ocular toxicity of ADCs. In addition, novel ocular toxicity signals not documented in product labeling were detected. Further research will be necessary to validate our findings in the future.

The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Myeloma Kidney Disease.

Renal failure is one of the most important manifestations of multiple myeloma. It is caused by renal lesions such as cast nephropathy, immunoglobulin deposition disease, AL amyloidosis or other glomerular and/or tubular diseases, mostly due to the toxic effect of free light chains in serum. Renal failure can represent a clinical emergency and is associated with poor outcome in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Although progression-free survival and overall survival have improved with the introduction of novel agents, renal failure remains a challenge for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Monoclonal antibodies are a component of therapy for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients and, based on clinical trials and real-world experience, are also safe and effective for subjects with renal failure, even if they are on dialysis. Most of the data are on anti-CD38 and anti-SLAM7 antibodies, but new antibody-drug conjugates such as belantamab mafodotin and bispecific antibodies also appear to be effective in myeloma kidney disease. In the future, we will have to face some challenges, such as defining new criteria for renal response to treatment, defining specific trials for these difficult-to-treat patients and integrating different therapeutic options.

Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) has shown promising antimyeloma activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) as a single agent. It was hypothesized that its multimodal activity may be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 pathway inhibition and activation of T cell-mediated antitumor responses. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of belamaf with pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM. DREAMM-4 (NCT03848845) was an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 study divided into dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-expansion (part 2) phases. Patients were ≥18 years old with ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 agent. Patients received belamaf (2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg, part 1; 2.5 mg/kg, part 2) and 200 mg pembrolizumab for ≤35 cycles. Of 41 enrolled patients, 34 (n=6 part 1, n=28 part 2) who received 2.5 mg/kg belamaf plus pembrolizumab were included in this final analysis. Sixteen patients (47%) achieved an overall response. Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in three of 10 patients who had very good partial response or better. Five of eight patients who had prior anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapy achieved partial response or better, including two who had B-cell maturation antigen-refractory disease. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were keratopathy (38%) and thrombocytopenia (29%). Despite belamaf-related ocular events, quality-of-life measures remained stable over time. No new safety signals were observed. The results of DREAMM-4 demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile of belamaf plus pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM. This trial is registered at www. gov as NCT03848845.

Corneal Toxicity in Patients Treated by BELANTAMAB MAFODOTIN: How to Improve and Facilitate Patients Follow-Up Using Refractive Shift?

Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common neoplastic blood disease worldwide. Belantamab mafodotin is a new antibody conjugate anti-B-cell maturation antigen effective against refractory myelomas. It induces intracorneal microcysts leading to refractive fluctuations. The aim of this study is to assess the value of monitoring refractive fluctuations based on the location of microcystic-like epithelial changes (MECs) to facilitate patient follow-up. Methods: This observational and multicentric study was conducted using data collected from several French centers contacted through secure email through a standardized data collection table. Results: The fluctuation of objective refraction in spherical equivalent confirms a significant myopic shift from peripheral to central forms. A decrease in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), an increase in keratometry, and an increase in central epithelial pachymetry have also been observed when MECs migrate toward the center. Conclusion: The myopization found in our study in patients with central and paracentral MECs is consistent with current literature. Fluctuations in BCVA, keratometry, and epithelial pachymetry are also consistent. This study is the first real-world study and highlights heterogeneity in follow-up, emphasizing the need to establish multidisciplinary follow-up strategies. The analysis of refractive fluctuations appears to be a reproducible and noninvasive screening method that could facilitate patient follow-up without the need for consultation focused on corneal diseases.

Visualization of Keratopathy Associated With the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Belantamab Mafodotin Using Infrared Imaging in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

The treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin is affected by ocular adverse effects, most frequently keratopathy with corneal microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs). To assess ocular side effects, the "Keratopathy and Visual Acuity (KVA) scale," based on the extent of keratopathy subjectively graded on slit-lamp examination and the change in best corrected visual acuity from baseline, was created. Advanced corneal imaging techniques have been explored to further characterize MECs and identify objective imaging biomarkers. We examined whether infrared reflectance imaging of the anterior segment (AS-IR) could contribute to the assessment, monitoring, and documentation of corneal toxicity in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin. In addition to the KVA examination, AS-IR imaging was performed. AS-IR images were evaluated for presence of visible hyporeflective lesions and their spatial and temporal distribution between visits and compared with keratopathy identified on slit-lamp examination. To standardize the assessment, a scoring system for lesions on AS-IR was implemented for additional analysis. Nine patients undergoing treatment with belantamab mafodotin for up to 9 months were examined. All patients exhibited hyporeflective lesions on AS-IR imaging, indicative of corneal toxicity corresponding to MECs observed on slit-lamp examination. AS-IR lesions showed early occurrence, variable quantity and size, and distinct distribution patterns, correlating with clinical findings during treatment. As shown for belantamab mafodotin, AS-IR imaging represents a fast, noninvasive, supplemental method for documentation, monitoring, and assessment of corneal adverse effects during treatment with antibody-drug conjugates, which may enable more standardized analyses.

Results from the randomized phase 3 DREAMM-8 study of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (BPd) vs pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

LBA105 Background: Use of triplet/quadruplet therapies for 1L MM raises the need for novel combinations at first relapse, which belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) combos may address. In DREAMM-7, BVd led to a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a strong trend in improved overall survival (OS) vs daratumumab-Vd in patients (pts) with ≥1 prior therapy. We report results from DREAMM-8 (NCT04484623), which tested a different belamaf combo (BPd) and met its primary endpoint of independent review committee–assessed PFS at a prespecified interim analysis. Methods: DREAMM-8 is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of BPd vs PVd in RRMM pts who received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LoT), including lenalidomide. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to BPd (28-d cycles): belamaf 2.5 mg/kg IV (D1, C1), 1.9 mg/kg (D1, C2+) + pom 4 mg (D1-21, all C) + dex 40 mg (D1, QW, all C), or PVd (21-d cycles): pom 4 mg (D1-14, all C) + bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 SC (D1, 4, 8, 11 [C1-8]; and D1, 8 [C9+]) + dex 20 mg (day of and 1 day after bortezomib dose). Results: 155 pts were randomly assigned to BPd and 147 to PVd. With a median (range) follow-up of 21.78 mo (0.03-39.23), median PFS (95% CI) was not reached (NR; 20.6-NR) with BPd vs 12.7 mo (9.1-18.5) with PVd (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; P&lt;0.001). 12-month PFS rate (95% CI) was 71% (63-78%) with BPd vs 51% (42-60%) with PVd. ORR (95% CI) was 77% (70.0-83.7%) with BPd vs 72% (64.1-79.2%) with PVd; rate of complete response or better (95% CI) was 40% (32.2-48.2%) with BPd vs 16% (10.7-23.3%) with PVd. Median duration of response (95% CI) was NR (24.9-NR) with BPd vs 17.5 mo (12.1-26.4) with PVd. A positive trend favoring BPd was seen for OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53-1.14); follow up for OS is ongoing. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in &gt;99% and 96% of pts in the BPd and PVd arms, respectively. Of pts treated with BPd, 89% had ocular AEs (CTCAE grade 3/4, 43%) vs 30% (grade 3/4, 2%) in the PVd arm. AEs were generally manageable, and broadly consistent with known safety profile of individual agents. Conclusions: The DREAMM-8 study demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit with BPd vs PVd in RRMM with &gt;1 prior LoT. BPd also led to deeper and more durable responses, showed a favorable OS trend, and had a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04484623 . [Table: see text]

Belantamab Mafodotin, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundTriplet or quadruplet therapies incorporating proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 antibodies have led to prolonged survival among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; however, most patients have a relapse. Frontline lenalidomide therapy has increased the number of patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease at the time of the first relapse.MethodsIn this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd), in lenalidomide-exposed patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Disease response and safety were also assessed.ResultsA total of 302 patients underwent randomization; 155 were assigned to the BPd group, and 147 to the PVd group. At a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, <0.1 to 39.2), the 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63 to 78), as compared with 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73; P<0.001). Data on overall survival were immature. The percentage of patients with a response to treatment (partial response or better) was 77% (95% CI, 70 to 84) in the BPd group and 72% (95% CI, 64 to 79) in the PVd group; 40% (95% CI, 32 to 48) and 16% (95% CI, 11 to 23), respectively, had a complete response or better. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group. Ocular events occurred in 89% of the patients who received BPd (grade 3 or 4 in 43%) and 30% of those who received PVd (grade 3 or 4 in 2%); ocular events in the BPd group were managed with belantamab mafodotin dose modification. Ocular events led to treatment discontinuation in 9% of the patients in the BPd group and in no patients in the PVd group.ConclusionsAmong lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, BPd conferred a significantly greater benefit than PVd with respect to progression-free survival, as well as deeper, more durable responses. Ocular events were common but were controllable by belantamab mafodotin dose modification. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-8 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04484623; EudraCT number, 2018-004354-21.)

Open-label, single-arm phase Ib/II study of immune combination therapy with elotuzumab and belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.

7559 Background: The B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin enhances cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. Elotuzumab, a signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7) checkpoint inhibitor, activates NK cells and induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Bela-Elo (NCT05002816) is an ongoing phase Ib/II trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the unique combination of these two agents in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). We report data from phase I part of this trial. Methods: This single-arm phase Ib/II study is enrolling patients with triple-class refractory RRMM. Patients with progression after prior BCMA-targeted therapy are eligible. Elotuzumab is administered via intravenous (IV) infusion at an established dose of 10 mg/kg on days 1, 8, 15, 22 every 28 days for cycles 1 and 2; followed by 20mg/kg on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. Belantamab mafodotin is administered via IV infusion with the starting dose of 1.9 mg/kg IV at every 4-week interval, with subsequent dose-reduction based on toxicity. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics and safety and efficacy outcomes. Results: As of data cut-off (January 20, 2024) 12 subjects have been enrolled; and 10 subjects received treatment on study. Median age of patients was 66.5 years (range 59-79). The patient population was heavily pretreated with 5 prior median lines of therapy (range 2-8); 40% (4/10) of patients were refractory to prior BCMA-targeted therapy (2 post-BCMA bispecific antibody, 2 post-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy [CART]). Phase I part of the study has completed. Median duration of treatment was 4 months (range 2-19). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Four severe adverse events were observed possibly related to the study treatment in 3 patients, including grade 3 pulmonary infection (n=1) and lymphopenia (n=3). Ocular keratopathy developed in 40% of patients, all were grades 1-2 and resolved after discontinuation or dose-reduction of belantamab. Preliminary activity is noted with partial responses (PR) in 4/10 (40%) and stable disease (SD) in additional 3/10 (30%) of patients. Among the four patients who were refractory to prior BCMA therapy, 2 (50%) achieved PR, with duration of response (DOR) of 19 months and 9 months, respectively. Conclusions: This novel combination immune therapy with belantamab mafodotin and elotuzumab appears to have an encouraging safety profile and a promising preliminary efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including in those with prior failure of BCMA-targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT05002816 .

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the DREAMM-7 randomized phase 3 study comparing belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd) vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

7543 Background: Belantamab mafodotin(belamaf), a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting B-cell maturation antigen, acts through a multimodal mechanism including direct cell killing and immune-mediated mechanisms. The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized, DREAMM-7 trial (NCT04246047) met its primary endpoint of demonstrating statistically significant progression-free survival benefit favoring BVd vs DVd in patients with RRMM who had received ≥1 prior line of therapy; here, we report PRO findings for BVd vs DVd. Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive BVd or DVd and completed electronic PRO measures at baseline and every 3 weeks (Q3W) during treatment. PRO measures included EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms (pain), PRO-CTCAE patient-reported tolerability, and OSDI vision-related functioning (Q3W up to the sixth dose of belamaf, then Q6W). Each domain was summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Among 494 patients (BVd, n=243; DVd, n=251), adherence to PRO assessments was &gt;90% for most study visits. There was no difference in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality-of-life assessments between the study arms over time. Similarly, role functioning, physical functioning, fatigue, and pain were stable (change from baseline in EORTC score was within 10 points) over time and consistent between arms. Most symptomatic adverse events evaluated by PRO-CTCAE were reported at no to low severity, frequency, and interference (PRO-CTCAE ratings ≤2) in both arms throughout the study. The severity and interference of blurred vision and frequency of watery eyes were reported at higher levels (PRO-CTCAE ratings ≥3) in the BVd arm. Among patients in the BVd arm with a clinically meaningful deterioration in vision-related functioning (a change from baseline of ≥12.5 points), EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status, role functioning, and physical functioning were comparable to the DVd arm over time. Conclusions: Overallquality of life, role functioning, physical functioning, fatigue, and pain were comparable in patients treated with BVd vs DVd. In patients treated with BVd who reported a clinically meaningful deterioration in vision-related functioning, overall quality of life was consistent with the DVd arm.

Evaluation of a novel method to guide belantamab mafodotin dosing in multiple myeloma based on a patient-reported questionnaire.

7530 Background: Ocular adverse events (OAEs, best corrected visual acuity [BCVA] change from baseline and keratopathy) are common with belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; GSK2857916) and often necessitate an ophthalmic exam to guide dosing. Herein, we evaluate a novel approach for belamaf dose modifications in transplant ineligible patients (pts) with newly diagnosed MM, treated with an extended schedule of belamaf with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in the BelaRd study. Methods: BelaRd (NCT04808037) is an ongoing, phase 1/2 study of 2 Parts. Part 1 established the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1.9 mg/kg q8w, extended to q12w to account for OAEs. Part 2 assesses the safety/efficacy of RP2D in Groups A and B, of 15 pts each, and evaluates two sets of guidelines for OAE management. In Group A, dosing is determined by an ophthalmic exam performed by a certified ophthalmologist; in Group B it is determined by the pts’ responses in the Vision Related Anamnestic (VRA) tool and the presence of ≥Grade (Gr) 3 OAEs. VRA is a patient-reported questionnaire capturing ocular symptoms and their impact on activities of daily living (ADL). Herein, we present the OAEs and preliminary efficacy results after 205 ophthalmic and VRA assessments for all Part 2 pts (cut-off date 05/10/2023). Results: By the cut-off date, the median belamaf administrations and number of cycles reached were 3.0/3.0 and 8.0/7.0 for Groups A and B, respectively. The respective rates of Gr2 and ≥Gr3 BCVA change from baseline were 34.6%/24.2% and 6.4%/0.0%, while a meaningful BCVA decline (Snellen score &lt;20/50) and ≥3 lines drop in the better-seeing eye was recorded in 11.0%/7.2% ophthalmological assessments; no ≥Gr3 keratopathy was observed. Among 110/94 VRA assessments, ocular symptoms and ADL impairment, manifesting for ≥50% of the time in the last 24 hours prior to belamaf administration (substantial time), were noted in 6.4%/10.6% and 3.6%/7.4%. Of note, VRA captured a “substantial time” response in 86% of assessments with ≥Gr3 OAEs. Finally, for the response-evaluable pts, at a median follow-up of 7.7 months, ORR was 93.3%/85.7% in Groups A and B (PR/VGPR/CR: 26.7%/53.3%/13.3%; 21.4%/64.3%/0.0%) and the median time to first response was ~ 1 month. Conclusions: The VRA tool was safe and effective in informing belamaf dose modifications. Future analyses will determine if VRA may effectively eliminate the need for an ophthalmic exam prior to belamaf dosing. Clinical trial information: NCT04808037 . [Table: see text]

Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundBelantamab mafodotin had single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a finding that supports further evaluation of the agent in combination with standard-care therapies.MethodsIn this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd), as compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd), in patients who had progression of multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response duration, and minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative status.ResultsIn total, 494 patients were randomly assigned to receive BVd (243 patients) or DVd (251 patients). At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 0.1 to 40.0), median progression-free survival was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to not reached) in the BVd group and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 17.5) in the DVd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.53; P<0.001). Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. An analysis of the restricted mean response duration favored BVd over DVd (P<0.001). A complete response or better plus MRD-negative status occurred in 25% of the patients in the BVd group and 10% of those in the DVd group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 95% of the patients in the BVd group and 78% of those in the DVd group. Ocular events were more common in the BVd group than in the DVd group (79% vs. 29%); such events were managed with dose modifications, and events of worsening visual acuity mostly resolved.ConclusionsAs compared with DVd therapy, BVd therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among patients who had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. Most patients had grade 3 or higher adverse events. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04246047; EudraCT number, 2018-003993-29.)

Exploring T cell subsets as predictors of response to BCMA targeting bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma.

7567 Background: BCMA targeting bispecific Antibody (bsAb) therapy has shown unprecedented response and survival rates in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The clinical activity of bsAb therapy has been shown to depend on T-cell function, yet clinical parameters, such as absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) have not been found to be associated with response to bsAbs. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether distinct T cell subsets, such as CD4 and CD8 counts as well as their proportion within the ALC are associated with outcome of BCMA targeting bsAb therapy. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on 79 patients who had been treated with at least one full dose of a BCMA targeting bsAb. T cell subsets, including ALC, total CD3, CD4 and CD8, were measured from peripheral blood within 7 days prior to bsAb therapy initiation. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS version 9.4 using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Median age of the patient cohort was 72 (31-84) years with 40/79 (51%) being male and 15/79 (19%) being African American. Median lines of therapy was 5 (2-12) with 78/79 (99%) patients being triple class refractory and 50/79 (63%) being penta-drug refractory. 59/79 (75%) of patients had at least one prior stem cell transplant (SCT) with 35/79 (44%) having had at least two SCTs. 26/79 (33%) patients had prior exposure to BCMA targeting therapy, with 18/79 (23%) and 8/79 (10%) previously having received belantamab mafodotin or BCMA targeting Car-T cell therapy respectively. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 38/79 (48%) of patients with the majority (92%) being grade 1 with the remainder being grade 2. Median ALC was 1.02 (0.25-5) x103/mL, median CD4 count was 0.27 (0.04-1.13) x103/mL while median CD8 count was 0.5 (0.07-2.97) x103/mL. Overall response (OR) rate of the whole cohort was 82% (69/79) with best responders (³very good partial response) comprising 51% (40/79). While total ALC, CD4 and CD8 counts did not appear to impact response to BCMA targeting bsAb therapy, the ratio of CD4 to ALC proved to be significantly associated with OR (univariate p=0.04) and best response (univariate p= 0.004, multivariate p=0.01) . The CD8 to ALC ratio had no significant impact in this patient population. The only other factor to show a significant association with response was the number of prior lines of therapy with higher numbers being associated with worse response (p=0.046). Conclusions: Our study suggests that an increased proportion of CD4 cells within the ALC is significantly associated with better response to BCMA targeting bsAb. While future studies are needed to elaborate on CD4 function in bsAB therapy, our findings imply that therapeutic strategies to increase the CD4 proportion could lead to improved bsAb therapy effectiveness.