psychology does not contain merely one theory or set of coherent facts that can be applied to education; there are a number of theories and a number of opposing 'facts'. In order to cope with these kinds of problems the educationist must examine the 'facts' and theories he has acquired from psychology as they operate in the course of the educative process in the classroom. This implies a whole new set of theories and principles over and above purely psychological ones. Has this two-way process operated in the application of psychological research, and just how much has psychology contributed to the study of education since its inception as a science less than a century and a half ago? Herbart (1776-I841) probably best marks the beginning of psychology's contribution to education, and his concepts recur continually in many of the psychologies discussed in this paper. As his work has been well examined by educationalists, suffice to say here that he described the mind as an apperceptive mass, built out of experience and activity with physical stimuli assimilated into ideas. Set in the context of formal Victorian education the activity aspect of his theory was somewhat revolutionary and began to have some effect on school curricula towards the end of the nineteenth century, with the result that practical activities, gardening, singing, painting, woodwork and such-like began to appear in what had been a predominantly bookish curricula. At the same time Herbart's doctrine of interest and theory of apperception were incorporated into formal steps for educational instruction: Preparation, Presentation, Association, Generalization and Application, which became the basis for the lesson procedure in a large number of twentieth century schools. Such schools as paid attention to Herbartian doctrines tended towards a holistic view of the child, and introduced curricula which co-ordinated and correlated what had previously been taught as rigidly distinct subjects. To Herbart the mind was the central problem of psychology. It was also to most psychologists who followed him, up to, and including, John Dewey (1859-1952), whose contributions have been as well examined by educators as Herbart's. He believed that out of the concrete acts of the child, organized and ordered towards an end, arises the orderliness of thought'. His Laboratory School put this psychological theory into practice and introduced workshops, laboratory materials and tools with which the child could create, construct, and actively enquire. Dewey also adapted courses of study to stages of development which crudely anticipated Piaget's cognitive stage theory and remain common practice in sequential presentation of history and science in schoolrooms to this day. Dewey and his contemporaries may be described as the early cognitive psychologists. As the mind then appeared to most, in the pre-behaviourist days, as the most likely centre where learning took place, the orientation appeared promising for the application of psychology to education.
Read full abstract