Beam Quality Correction Factors Research Articles

Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams

Objective. In this experimental work we compared the determination of absorbed dose to water using four ionization chambers (ICs), a PTW-34045 Advanced Markus, a PTW-34001 Roos, an IBA-PPC05 and a PTW-30012 Farmer, irradiated under the same conditions in one continuous- and in two pulsed-scanned proton beams. Approach. The ICs were positioned at 2 cm depth in a water phantom in four square-field single-energy scanned-proton beams with nominal energies between 80 and 220 MeV and in the middle of 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 dose cubes centered at 10 cm or 12.5 cm depth in water. The water-equivalent thickness (WET) of the entrance window and the effective point of measurement was considered when positioning the plane parallel (PP) ICs and the cylindrical ICs, respectively. To reduce uncertainties, all ICs were calibrated at the same primary standards laboratory. We used the beam quality (k Q ) correction factors for the ICs under investigation from IAEA TRS-398, the newly calculated Monte Carlo (MC) values and the anticipated IAEA TRS-398 updated recommendations. Main results. Dose differences among the four ICs ranged between 1.5% and 3.7% using both the TRS-398 and the newly recommended k Q values. The spread among the chambers is reduced with the newly k Q values. The largest differences were observed between the rest of the ICs and the IBA-PPC05 IC, obtaining lower dose with the IBA-PPC05. Significance. We provide experimental data comparing different types of chambers in different proton beam qualities. The observed dose differences between the ICs appear to be related to inconsistencies in the determination of the k Q values. For PP ICs, MC studies account for the physical thickness of the entrance window rather than the WET. The additional energy loss that the wall material invokes is not negligible for the IBA-PPC05 and might partially explain the low k Q values determined for this IC. To resolve this inconsistency and to benchmark MC values, k Q values measured using calorimetry are needed.

Beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in a 0.35 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linac – A Monte Carlo study

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to directly calculate kQmsrB,fmsr correction factors for four cylindrical ICs for a 0.35 T MR-linac using the Monte Carlo (MC) method. MethodsA previously-validated TOPAS/GEANT4 MC head model of the 0.35 T MR-linac was employed. The MR-compatible Exradin A12, A1SL, A26, and A28 cylindrical ICs were modeled considering the dead volume in the air cavity. The kQmsrB,fmsr correction factor was determined for initial electron energies of 5–7 MeV. The correction factor was calculated for all four angular orientations in the lateral plane. The impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on the IC response was also investigated. ResultsThe maximum beam quality dependence in the kQmsrB,fmsr exhibited by the A12, A1SL, A26, and A28 ICs was 1.10 %, 2.17 %, 0.81 %, and 1.75 %, respectively, considering all angular orientations. The magnetic field dependence was < 1 % and the maximum kQmsrB,fmsr correction was < 2 % when the detector was aligned along the direction of the magnetic field at 0° and 180° angles. The A12 IC over-responded up to 5.40 % for the orthogonal orientation. An asymmetry in the response of up to 8.30 % was noted for the A28 IC aligned at 90° and 270° angles. ConclusionsA parallel orientation for the IC, with respect to the magnetic field, is recommended for reference dosimetry in MRgRT. Both over and under-response in the IC signal was noted for the orthogonal orientations, which is highly dependent on the cavity diameter, cavity length, and the dead volume.

Investigation of ionization chamber perturbation factors using proton beam and Fano cavity test for the Monte Carlo simulation code PHITS.

The reference dose for clinical proton beam therapy is based on ionization chamber dosimetry. However, data on uncertainties in proton dosimetry are lacking, and multifaceted studies are required. Monte Carlo simulations are useful tools for calculating ionization chamber dosimetry in radiation fields and are sensitive to the transport algorithm parameters when particles are transported in a heterogeneous region. We aimed to evaluate the proton transport algorithm of the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System (PHITS) using the Fano test. The response of the ionization chamber and beam quality correction factors were calculated using the same parameters as those in the Fano test and compared with those of other Monte Carlo codes for verification. The geometry of the Fano test consisted of a cylindrical gas-filled cavity sandwiched between two cylindrical walls. was calculated as the ratio of the absorbed dose in water to the dose in the cavity in the chamber. We compared the calculated using PHITS with that of a previous study, which was calculated using other Monte Carlo codes (Geant4, FULKA, and PENH) under similar conditions. The flight mesh, a parameter for charged particle transport, passed the Fano test within 0.15%. This was shown to be sufficiently accurate compared with that observed in previous studies. The calculated using PHITS were 1.116 ± 0.002 and 1.124 ± 0.003 for NACP-02 and PTW-30013, respectively, and the were 0.981 ± 0.008 and 1.027 ± 0.008, respectively, at 150MeV. Our results indicate that PHITS can calculate the and with high precision.

Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy electron beams

Purpose:As the dosimetry protocol TRS 398 is being revised and the ICRU report 90 provides new recommendations for density correction as well as the mean ionization energies of water and graphite, updated beam quality correction factors kQ are calculated for reference dosimetry in electron beams and for independent validation of previously determined values. Methods:Monte Carlo simulations have been performed using EGSnrc to calculate the absorbed dose to water and the dose to the active volumes of ionization chambers SNC600c, SNC125c and SNC350p (all Sun Nuclear, A Mirion Medical Company, Melbourne, FL). Realistic clinical electron beam spectra were used to cover the entire energy range of therapeutic electron accelerators. The Monte Carlo simulations were validated by measurements on a clinical linear accelerator.With regards to the cylindrical chambers, the simulations were performed according to the setup recommendations of TRS 398 and AAPM TG 51, i.e. with and without consideration of a reference point shift by rcav/2. Results:kQ values as a function of the respective beam quality specifier R50 were fitted by recommended equations for electron beam dosimetry in the range of 5 MeV to 18 MeV. The fitting curves to the calculated values showed a root mean square deviation between 0.0016 and 0.0024. Conclusion:Electron beam quality correction factors kQ were calculated by Monte Carlo simulations for the cylindrical ionization chambers SNC600c and SNC125c as well as the plane parallel ionization chamber SNC350p to provide updated data for the TRS 398 and TG 51 dosimetry protocols.

Kilovoltage X-ray beam quality effect on the relative response of alanine pellet dosemeters.

Determination of beam quality correction factors is crucial for performing accurate alanine pellet dosimetry in non-reference fields. For some complex irradiation geometries, interpolation from literature data is more convenient than an experimental approach to establish these factors. Here we investigate the validity of extracting quality correction factors from literature data based on information on beam qualifiers such as half-value layer (HVL) or effective energy ${E}_{\text{eff}}$. A combination of Monte Carlo calculated dose ratios and a microdosimetric assessment of the relative efficiency allows for numerical evaluation of quality correction factors for a wide array of X-ray qualities. The computational analysis demonstrates that the average energy of the X-ray beam is optimal for characterizing the relative response. Special care should be taken when using the common X-ray beam qualifiers HVL or ${E}_{\text{eff}}$ to determine quality correction factors from literature data.

Monte Carlo-calculated beam quality and perturbation correction factors validated against experiments for Farmer and Markus type ionization chambers in therapeutic carbon-ion beams

Objective. In current dosimetry protocols, the estimated uncertainty of the measured absorbed dose to water D w in carbon-ion beams is approximately 3%. This large uncertainty is mainly contributed by the standard uncertainty of the beam quality correction factor k Q. In this study, the k Q values in four cylindrical chambers and two plane-parallel chambers were calculated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in the plateau region. The chamber-specific perturbation correction factor P of each chamber was also determined through MC simulations. Approach. k Q for each chamber was calculated using MC code Geant4. The simulated k Q ratios in subjected chambers and reference chambers were validated through comparisons against our measured values. In the measurements in Heavy-Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba, k Q ratios were obtained from D w values of 60Co, 290- and 400 MeV u−1 carbon-ion beams that were measured with the subjected ionization chamber and the reference chamber. In the simulations, f Q (the product of the water-to-air stopping power ratio and P) was acquired from D w and the absorbed dose to air calculated in the sensitive volume of each chamber. k Q values were then calculated from the simulated f Q and the literature-extracted W air and compared with previous publications. Main results. The calculated k Q ratios in the subjected chambers to the reference chamber agreed well with the measured k Q ratios. The k Q uncertainty was reduced from the current recommendation of approximately 3% to 1.7%. The P values were close to unity in the cylindrical chambers and nearly 1% above unity in the plane-parallel chambers. Significance. The k Q values of carbon-ion beams were accurately calculated in MC simulations and the k Q ratios were validated through ionization chamber measurements. The results indicate a need for updating the current recommendations, which assume a constant P of unity in carbon-ion beams, to recommendations that consider chamber-induced differences.

Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams – deriving uncertainties from published data

For the update of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice (CoP), global ionization chamber factors (fQ) and beam quality correction factors (kQ) for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams have been calculated with different Monte Carlo codes. In this study, average Monte Carlo calculated fQ and kQ factors are provided and the uncertainty of these factors is estimated. Average fQ factors in monoenergetic proton beams with energies between 60 MeV and 250 MeV were derived from Monte Carlo calculated fQ factors published in the literature. Altogether, 195 fQ factors for six plane-parallel and three cylindrical ionization chambers calculated with penh, fluka and geant4 were incorporated. Additionally, a weighted standard deviation of fQ factors was calculated, where the same weight was assigned to each Monte Carlo code. From average fQ factors, kQ factors were derived and compared to the values from the IAEA TRS-398 CoP published in 2000 as well as to the values of the upcoming version. Average Monte Carlo calculated fQ factors are constant within 0.6% over the energy range investigated. In general, the different Monte Carlo codes agree within 1% for low energies and show larger differences up to 2% for high energies. As a result, the standard deviation of fQ factors increases with energy and is ∼0.3% for low energies and ∼0.8% for high energies. kQ factors derived from average Monte Carlo calculated fQ factors differ from the values presented in the IAEA TRS-398 CoP by up to 2.4%. The overall estimated uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculated kQ factors is ∼0.5%–1% smaller than the uncertainties estimated in IAEA TRS-398 CoP since the individual ionization chamber characteristics (e.g. fluence perturbations) are considered in detail in Monte Carlo calculations. The agreement between Monte Carlo calculated kQ factors and the values of the upcoming version of IAEA TRS-398 CoP is better with deviations smaller than 1%.

Energy-based Hp(3) measurement using solid-state detector.

This study aimed to develop an energy-based Hp(3) measurement method using a solid-state detector (SSD). Incident and entrance surface air kerma were measured using an ionization chamber placed free-in-air and in front of an anthropomorphic or slab phantom. Subsequently, three SSDs were placed free-in-air, and half-value layer and readings were obtained. After measurements, an X-ray beam quality correction factor $\left ({{k}}_{{Q},{{Q}}_{\mathbf{0}}}^{{SSD}}\right)$, backscatter factor (BSF) and conversion factor from incident air kerma to Hp(3) (C3) were determined. Then, the incident air kerma by SSD $\left ({{K}}_{{a},{i}}^{{SSD}}\right )$, Hp(3) and Hp(3)/${{K}}_{{a},{i}}^{{SSD}}$ were calculated. The ${{k}}_{{Q},{{Q}}_{\mathbf{0}}}^{{SSD}}$ was almost consistent for all SSDs. The C3 and BSF were found to increase as tube potential increased. The Hp(3)/${{K}}_{{a},{i}}^{{SSD}}$ calculated with the anthropomorphic and slab phantoms were consistent within 2.1% and 2.6% for all SSDs, respectively. This method improves the energy dependence of Hp(3) measurement and can estimate the Hp(3) measurement error for dedicated Hp(3) dosemeters.

Technical note: Consistency of IAEA's TRS‐483 and AAPM's extended TG‐51 protocols for clinical reference dosimetry of the CyberKnife M6 machine

While IAEA's TRS-483 code of practice is adapted for the calibration of CyberKnife machines, AAPM's TG-51 is still the protocol recommended by the manufacturer for their calibration. The differences between both protocols could lead to differences in absorbed dose to water during the calibrationprocess. The aims of this work are to evaluate the difference resulting from the application of TG-51 (including the manufacturer's adaptations) and TRS-483 in terms of absorbed dose to water for a CyberKnife M6, and to evaluate the consistency ofTRS-483. Measurements are performed on a CyberKnife M6 unit under machine-specific reference conditions using a calibrated Exradin A12 ionization chamber. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are performed to estimate and using a fully modeled detector and an optimized CyberKnife M6 beam model. The latter is also estimated experimentally. Differences between the adapted TG-51 and TRS-483 protocols are identified and their impact isquantified. When using an in-house experimentally-evaluated volume averaging correction factor, a difference of 0.11% in terms of absorbed dose to water per monitor unit is observed when applying both protocols. This disparity is solely associated to the difference in beam quality correction factor. If a generic volume averaging correction factor is used during the application of TRS-483, the difference in calibration increases to 0.14%. In both cases, the disparity is not statistically significant according to TRS-483's reported uncertainties on their beam quality correction factor (i.e., 1%). MC results lead to and . Results illustrate that the generic beam quality correction factor provided in the TRS-483 might be overestimated by 0.36% compared to our specific model and that this overestimation could be due to the volume averagingcomponent. For clinical reference dosimetry of the CyberKnife M6, the application of TRS-483 is found to be consistent withTG-51.

Characteristics Performance of Newly Developed Parallel Plate Chamber in Electron Beams.

To investigate the dosimetric performance of newly developed parallel plate chamber in electron beams. Rosalina Instruments India Private Limited (Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) has designed and fabricated PRATT2 parallel plate chamber. The various dosimetric characteristics, including pre- and post-irradiation leakage, stability, polarity effect, chamber response with bias voltage, dose linearity, dose rate effect, and chamber absorbed dose calibration, were performed for the developed chamber. The electron beam energies of 4, 6, 8, and 15MeV were used in this study. The pre- and post-irradiation leakage of the developed chamber was within the acceptable limit. The chamber shows good stability over the electron beams used in this study. The maximum error in polarity effect was 0.7% for the developed chamber. The chamber shows the good linear response with dose, and its response is independent of the dose rate for all electron beams. The beam quality correction factor (kQ, Q0) was determined for the all electron beam energies, which was used for determination absorbed dose in electron beams. The developed parallel plate chamber (PRATT2) is suitable for dosimetry of electron beams in radiotherapy. The chamber is cost effective and shows precise and reproducible response. The study carried out confirms that the newly designed and fabricated ion chamber can be used in the measurement of absorbed dose for therapeutic electron beams.

On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams.

In a recent study, we reported beam quality correction factors, fQ , in carbon ion beams using Monte Carlo (MC) methods for a cylindrical and a parallel-plate ionization chamber (IC). A non-negligible perturbation effect was observed; however, the magnitude of the perturbation correction due to the specific IC subcomponents was not included. Furthermore, the stopping power data presented in the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) report 73 were used, whereas the latest stopping power data have been reported in the ICRU report 90. The aim of this study was to extend our previous work by computing fQ correction factors using the ICRU 90 stopping power data and by reporting IC-specific perturbation correction factors. Possible energy or linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the fQ correction factor was investigated by simulating both pristine beams and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs). The TOol for PArticle Simulation (TOPAS)/GEANT4 MC code was used in this study. A 30 × 30 × 50 cm3 water phantom was simulated with a uniform 10 × 10 cm2 parallel beam incident on the surface. A Farmer-type cylindrical IC (Exradin A12) and two parallel-plate ICs (Exradin P11 and A11) were simulated in TOPAS using the manufacturer-provided geometrical drawings. The fQ correction factor was calculated in pristine carbon ion beams in the 150-450 MeV/u energy range at 2 cm depth and in the middle of the flat region of four SOBPs. The kQ correction factor was calculated by simulating the fQo correction factor in a 60 Co beam at 5 cm depth. The perturbation correction factors due to the presence of the individual IC subcomponents, such as the displacement effect in the air cavity, collecting electrode, chamber wall, and chamber stem, were calculated at 2 cm depth for monoenergetic beams only. Additionally, the mean dose-averaged and track-averaged LET was calculated at the depths at which the fQ was calculated. The ICRU 90 fQ correction factors were reported. The pdis correction factor was found to be significant for the cylindrical IC with magnitudes up to 1.70%. The individual perturbation corrections for the parallel-plate ICs were <1.0% except for the A11 pcel correction at the lowest energy. The fQ correction for the P11 IC exhibited an energy dependence of >1.00% and displayed differences up to 0.87% between pristine beams and SOBPs. Conversely, the fQ for A11 and A12 displayed a minimal energy dependence of <0.50%. The energy dependence was found to manifest in the LET dependence for the P11 IC. A statistically significant LET dependence was found only for the P11 IC in pristine beams only with a magnitude of <1.10%. The perturbation and kQ correction factor should be calculated for the specific IC to be used in carbon ion beam reference dosimetry as a function of beam quality.

Construction and pre-evaluation of an in-house cylindrical ionization chamber fabricated from locally available materials

Abstract Introduction: The objectives of this study were to construct a very robust in-house cylindrical ionization chamber from locally available materials to minimize cost, and to assess its suitability for use in a clinical setting. Materials and Methods: The entire body of the constructed IC was composed of Perspex (PMMA). Other components of the IC were made from locally available materials, such as paper and discarded items. The in-house IC was made waterproof by passing the triaxial cable connecting its various electrodes through a plastic tube which once served as a drainage tube of a urine bag. This connection was made such that the chamber was vented to the environment. The completed in-house IC was evaluated for: polarity effect, ion recombination, ion collection efficiency, stability, dose linearity, stem effect, leakage current, angular, dose rate and energy dependences. Results: Although the pre-evaluation results confirmed that the in-house IC satisfied the stipulated international standards for ICs, there was a need to enhance the stem effect and leakage current characteristics of the IC. The in-house IC was found to have an absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient of 4.475 x 107 Gy/C (uncertainty of 1.6%) for cobalt 60 through a cross-calibration with a commercial 0.6 cc cylindrical IC with traceability to the Germany National Dosimetry Laboratory. Using a Jaffé diagram, the in-house IC was also found to have a recombination correction factor of 1.0078 when operated at the calibration voltage of + 400 V. In terms of beam quality correction factors for megavoltage beams, the in-house IC was found to exhibit characteristics similar to those of Scanditronix-Wellhofer IC 70 Farmer type IC. Conclusion: The constructed in-house Farmer-type IC was able to meet all the recommended characteristics for an IC, and therefore, the in-house IC is suitable for beam output calibration in external beam radiotherapy.

Absorbed-dose-to-water measurement using alanine in ultra-high-pulse-dose-rate electron beams

Objective. The aim of the presented study is to evaluate the dose response of the PTB’s secondary standard system, which is based on alanine and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy measurement, in ultra-high-pulse-dose-rate (UHPDR) electron beams. Approach. The alanine dosimeter system was evaluated in the PTB’s UHPDR electron beams (20 MeV) in a range of 0.15–6.2 Gy per pulse. The relationship between the obtained absorbed dose to water per pulse and the in-beamline charge measurement of the electron pulses acquired using an integrating current transformer (ICT) was evaluated. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the beam quality conversion and correction factors required to perform alanine dosimetry. Main results. The beam quality conversion factor from the reference quality 60Co to 20 MeV obtained by Monte Carlo simulation, 1.010(1), was found to be within the standard uncertainty of the consensus value, 1.014(5). The dose-to-water relative standard uncertainty was determined to be 0.68% in PTB’s UHPDR electron beams. Significance. In this investigation, the dose-response of the PTB’s alanine dosimeter system was evaluated in a range of dose per pulse between 0.15 Gy and 6.2 Gy and no evidence of dose-response dependency of the PTB’s secondary standard system based on alanine was observed. The alanine/ESR system was shown to be a precise dosimetry system for evaluating absorbed dose to water in UHPDR electron beams.

Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams

Objective. To review the currently available data on beam quality correction factors, for ionization chambers in clinical proton beams and derive their current best estimates for the updated recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice. Approach. The reviewed data come from 20 publications from which values can be derived either directly from calorimeter measurements, indirectly from comparison with other chambers or from Monte Carlo calculated overall chamber factors, For cylindrical ionization chambers, a distinction is made between data obtained in the centre of a spread-out Bragg peak and those obtained in the plateau region of single-energy fields. For the latter, the effect of depth dose gradients has to be considered. To this end an empirical model for previously published displacement correction factors for single-layer scanned beams was established, while for unmodulated scattered beams experimental data were used. From all the data, chamber factors, and chamber perturbation correction factors, were then derived and analysed. Main results. The analysis showed that except for the beam quality dependence of the water-to-air mass stopping power ratio and, for cylindrical ionization chambers in unmodulated beams, of the displacement correction factor, there is no remaining beam quality dependence of the chamber perturbation correction factors Based on this approach, average values of the beam quality independent part of the perturbation factors were derived to calculate values consistent with the data in the literature. Significance. The resulting data from this analysis are current best estimates of values for modulated scattered beams and single-layer scanned beams used in proton therapy. Based on this, a single set of harmonized values is derived to be recommended in the update of IAEA TRS-398.

A study of the beam quality correction factor in clinical proton beam conditions using Monte Carlo simulations

A study of the beam quality correction factor in clinical proton beam conditions using Monte Carlo simulations

PD-0810 Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for photon reference dosimetry

PD-0810 Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for photon reference dosimetry

Determination of beam quality correction factors for the Roos plane-parallel ionisation chamber exposed to very high energy electron (VHEE) beams using Geant4

Detailed characterisation of the Roos secondary standard plane-parallel ionisation chamber has been conducted in a novel 200 MeV Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) beam with reference to the standard 12 MeV electron calibration beam used in our experimental work. Stopping-power-ratios and perturbation factors have been determined for both beams and used to calculated the beam quality correction factor using the Geant4 general purpose MC code. These factors have been calculated for a variety of charged particle transport parameters available in Geant4 which were found to pass the Fano cavity test. Stopping-power-ratios for the 12 MeV electron calibration beam quality were found to agree within uncertainties to that quoted by current dosimetry protocols. Perturbation factors were found to vary by up-to 4% for the calibration beam depending on the parameter configuration, compared with only 0.8% for the VHEE beam. Beam quality correction factors were found to describe an approximately 10% lower dose than would be originally calculated if a beam quality correction were not accounted for. Moreover, results presented here largely resolve unphysical chamber measurements, such as collection efficiencies greater than 100%, and assist in the accurate determination of absorbed dose and ion recombination in secondary standard ionisation chambers.

Experimental determination of k Q factors for two types of ionization chambers in scanned proton beams

Objective. Experimental determination of beam quality k Q factors for two types of Farmer ionization chambers, NE2571 and IBA FC65-G, in a scanned proton beam for three nominal energies (140 MeV, 180 MeV and 220 MeV) based on water calorimetry. Approach. Beam quality correction factors were determined comparing the results obtained with water calorimetry and ionometry. Water calorimetry was performed to determine the absorbed dose at a depth of measurement in water of 5 g cm−2, limited by the extension of the calorimeter glass vessel used. For the ionometry, two chambers of each type were included in the study. The ionization chambers were calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in 60Co at the Swedish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, directly traceable to the BIPM, and were used according to the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice. Main results. The k Q values determined in the present work have been compared with the values tabulated in TRS-398 and its forthcoming update and also with those obtained in previous water calorimetric measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. All results were found to agree within the combined uncertainties of the different data. Significance. It is expected that the present work will serve as an experimental contribution to k Q -factors for the two chamber types and three scanned proton beam qualities used.

Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.

Although several studies provide data for reference dosimetry, the SNC600c and SNC125c ionization chambers (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL) are in clinical use worldwide for which no beam quality correction factors kQ are available. The goal of this study was to calculate beam quality correction factors kQ for these ionization chambers according to dosimetry protocols TG-51, TRS 398 and DIN 6800-2. Monte Carlo simulations using EGSnrc have been performed to calculate the absorbed dose to water and the dose to air within the active volume of ionization chamber models. Both spectra and simulations of beam transport through linear accelerator head models were used as radiation sources for the Monte Carlo calculations. kQ values as a function of the respective beam quality specifier Q were fitted against recommended equations for photon beam dosimetry in the range of 4 MV to 25 MV. The fitting curves through the calculated values showed a root mean square deviation between 0.0010 and 0.0017. The investigated ionization chamber models (SNC600c, SNC125c) are not included in above mentioned dosimetry protocols, but are in clinical use worldwide. This study covered this knowledge gap and compared the calculated results with published kQ values for similar ionization chambers. Agreements with published data were observed in the 95% confidence interval, confirming the use of data for similar ionization chambers, when there are no kQ values available for a given ionization chamber.

Evaluating the Impact of Ionization Chamber-Specific Beam Quality Correction Factor in Dosimetry of Filtered and Unfiltered Photon Beams.

Aim:The response of ionization chamber changes when used at beam quality Q which is different from beam quality Qo (usually 60Co) that was used at the time of its calibration. Hence, one needs to apply beam quality correction factor (kQ, Qo) during dosimetric measurements. However, kQ, Qo data are unavailable for novel ion chambers in the literature. Moreover, most of such data do not differentiate between filtered (flat) and unfiltered (unflat) beams. In addition, literature-based data do not differentiate among different pieces of the ion chambers of the same make and model. Hence, the purpose of our study was to determine the ion chamber-specific experimental values of kQ, Qo and to evaluate their impact in dosimetry.Materials and Methods:In this work, the value of kQ, Qo were measured for six ionization chambers of three different types in 6, 10, and 15 MV filtered (with flattening filter [WFF]) as well as 6 and 10 MV unfiltered (flattening filter free [FFF]) photon beams. The measured values of kQ, Qo were compared with Monte Carlo-calculated values available in the literature. The uncertainties in measurement of kQ, Qo values were also evaluated.Results:For 6 MV FFF beam, the measured value of kQ, Qo was found to be consistently lower than 6 MV WFF beam for all Sun Nuclear Corporation ion chambers, while it was higher as per the theoretical data. The inter-chamber variation in kQ, Qo values was observed for the same model of the ion chambers. The maximum difference between absolute dose values on using the theoretical and experimental kQ, Qo values was up to 3.23%.Conclusion:The measured absolute dose values by the ion chamber of a given make and model were found different due to the use of its theoretical and experimental kQ, Qo values. Furthermore, the variation in response of different pieces of ion chambers of the same make and model cannot be accounted for theoretically, and hence, the use of theoretical kQ, Qo data may introduce an inherent error in the estimation of absorbed dose to water. This necessitates the use of measured value of kQ, Qo for each ionization chamber.