Beam-on Time Research Articles

Improvement of treatment plan quality with modified fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy in cervical cancer.

This study aims to introduce modified fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy (MF-VMAT) which manually opened the field size by fixing the jaws and comparing it to the typical planning technique, auto field volumetric modulated arc therapy (AF-VMAT) in cervical cancer treatment planning. Previously treated twenty-eight cervical cancer plans were retrospectively randomly selected and replanned in this study using two different planning techniques: AF-VMAT and MF-VMAT, resulting in a total of fifty-six treatment plans. In this study, we compared both planning techniques in three parts: (1) Organ at Risk (OARs) and whole-body dose, (2) Treatment plan efficiency, and (3) Treatment plan accuracy. For OARs dose, bowel bag (p-value=0.001), rectum (p-value=0.002), and left femoral head (p-value=0.001) and whole-body (p-value=0.000) received a statistically significant dose reduction when using the MF-VMAT plan. Regarding plan efficiency, MF-VMAT exhibited a statistically significant increase in both number of monitor units (MUs) and control points (p-values=0.000), while beam-on time, maximum leaf travel, average maximum leaf travel, and maximum leaf travel per gantry rotation were statistically significant decreased (p-values=0.000). In terms of plan accuracy, the average gamma passing rate was higher in the MF-VMAT plan for both absolute dose (AD) (p-value=0.001, 0.004) and relative dose (RD) (p-value=0.000, 0.000) for 3%/3 and 3%/2mm gamma criteria, respectively. The MF-VMAT planning technique significantly reduces OAR doses and decreases the spread of low doses to normal tissues in cervical cancer patients. Additionally, this planning approach demonstrates efficient plans with lower beam-on time and reduced maximum leaf travel. Furthermore, it indicates higher plan accuracy through an increase in the average gamma passing rate compared to the AF-VMAT plan. Consequently, MF-VMAT offers an effective treatment planning technique for cervical cancer patients.

Emulating the Delivery of Sawtooth Proton Arc Therapy Plans on a Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam Therapy System

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the deliverability of ‘sawtooth’ proton arc therapy (PAT) plans relative to static intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) at a cyclotron-based clinical facility. Methods: The delivery of single and dual arc Sawtooth PAT plans for an abdominal CT phantom and multiple clinical cases of brain, head and neck (H&N) and base of skull (BoS) targets was emulated under the step-and-shoot and continuous PAT delivery regimes and compared to that of a corresponding static IMPT plan. Results: Continuous PAT delivery increased the time associated with beam delivery and gantry movement in single/dual PAT plans by 4.86/7.34 min (brain), 7.51/12.40 min (BoS) and 6.59/10.57 min (H&N) on average relative to static IMPT. Step-and-shoot PAT increased this delivery time further by 4.79 min on average as the delivery was limited by gantry motion. Conclusions: The emulator can approximately model clinical sawtooth PAT delivery but requires experimental validation. No clear benefit was observed regarding beam-on time for sawtooth PAT relative to static IMPT.

Stereotactic centralized ablative radiation therapy: A novel methodology in treating bulky tumor and its technical realization.

159 Background: Bulky tumors pose significant challenges to traditional treatment modalities such as surgery, chemotherapy, and conventional radiotherapy. This study introduces a novel therapeutic approach named as Stereotactic-Core-Ablative-Radiation-Therapy (SCART), designed to deliver an ablative dose to a substantial core of the bulky tumor while quickly decreasing to a lower dose at the tumor periphery. Methods: A SCART-Treatment-Volume (STV) at the core of the GTV was predefined to administer an ablative radiation dose, aiming to induce DNA damage in cancer cells and potentially trigger biological cancer-killing effects. Utilizing Linac-based VMAT or Cyberknife techniques with 6MV photon beams, multiple radiation fields intersect and optimize at STV, generating an ablative dose at the STV. The dose rapidly diminishes to a safe level at the edge of GTV sparing the surrounding tissue. In the phase-1 trial, nineteen patients with 21 bulky tumors enrolled, receiving SCART at five dose levels (15GyX1, 15GyX2, 15GyX3, 18GyX3, 21GyX3, and 24GyX3), while maintaining the GTV's peripheral dose at 5Gy each fraction. Results: All patients completed treatment with average beam-on time of 8.9min and average treatment time of 18.5min. Mean follow-up time is 15.4 month. No grade-III or higher toxicity was observed. 7/19 patients still survive, with the overall survival of 40% at 30 months. Mean tumor volume shrinks by 60% between initial 301cc and post-SCART volumes of 118cc. Long-term follow-up revealed that 14/21 tumors achieved Partial Response, 2/21 Complete-Response, 3/21 Stable-Disease, and 1/21 Progressive-Disease, leading to an encouraging local control of 95%. Conclusions: SCART emerges as a safe and effective strategy for treating bulky malignant tumors, demonstrating excellent local control and overall survival. Multiple treatment courses were feasible. The results from phase-1 study suggest that SCART could revolutionize the treatment landscape for bulky tumors, offering a promising avenue for further exploration and application in clinical practice.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison of IMRT and VMAT using flattening filter and flattening filter-free beams.

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate plan quality and treatment delivery parameters of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. The study utilized different isocentric modulated techniques: intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and 10 MV flattening filter-free beams (FFF). Fifteen retrospective prostate cancer patients were selected for this study. Sixty plans were created with an SBRT-prescribed dose of 36.25Gy delivered in five fractions. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage, plan quality indices, doses delivered to organs at risk (OARs), and treatment delivery parameters were compared for all plans. It turned out that VMAT plans, particularly those using the FFF beam, provided superior target conformality and a steeper dose gradient as compared to IMRT plans. Additionally, VMAT plans showed better OARs sparing compared to IMRT plans. However, IMRT plans delivered a lower maximum dose to the target than VMAT plans. Importantly, the VMAT plans resulted in reduced treatment delivery parameters, including beam on time (BOT), monitor unit (MU), and modulation factor (MF), compared to IMRT plans. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was observed in BOT and mean body dose between FF and FFF beams, with FFF beams showing superior performance. Considering all results, VMAT using 10 MV (FFF) is suggested for treating prostate cancer patients with SBRT. This offers the fastest delivery in addition to maintaining the highest plan quality.

Using Scorecards to Tune Ethos Directive Templates: An Adaptive Radiation Therapy Individualized Approach-Cervix Dosimetric Planning Study

The Adaptive Radiation Therapy Individualized Approach-Cervix clinical trial uses predefined clinical directive templates (CDTs) combined with RapidPlan dose-volume histogram estimations (DVHe) to guide plan optimization in the Ethos treatment planning system. The dosimetric scorecard is a scoring tool that quantifies improvements in plan quality after physicians have precisely expressed their complete clinical intent. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use the dosimetric scorecard tool to tune an Ethos CDT to improve resulting plan quality. Iterative replanning was used to modify the draft CDT (CDT-1) in Ethos 1.1 to generate a new CDT (CDT-2) that maximized the clinical consensus scorecard's total score compared with CDT-1. CDT-2 was established, and resulting plans were compared with and without a DVHe. Additional fixed field intensity modulated radiation therapy beam geometries were compared between CDT-1 and CDT-2, both with DVHe. After obtaining favorable results when comparing CDT-1 versus CDT-2 for 2 test cases, 10 additional cases were retrospectively identified and tested. CDT-2 reduced organ at risk doses without compromising planning target volume coverage in the initial test cases. When combined with DVHe, CDT-2 marginally outperformed CDT-1. Plan quality further improved with a 19-field geometry. In the expanded analysis, CDT-2 achieved higher scores than CDT-1 in most cases, with the 19-field approach showing superiority. Optimization and calculation time increased by 1.9 minutes, monitor unit (MU)/field decreased by 44.4, whereas beam-on time increased by 2.8 minutes when increasing fields to 19 from 9. Reoptimization with Ethos 1.1 Maintenance Release 1 resulted in decreased MU and minimal score changes. The scorecard is an effective tool to adjust an Ethos CDT to improve the average calculated plan quality. It also allowed for easy evaluation of the dosimetric impact of other planning parameters (beam arrangements and use of DVHe) to identify the best approach. Using a finely tuned CDT is expected to improve planning efficiency and decrease intrainstitutional plan quality variability, benefiting cone beam computed tomography-guided adaptive radiation therapy.

Dosimetrical and geometrical parameters in single-fraction lattice radiotherapy for the treatment of bulky tumors: Insights from initial clinical experience

PurposeThis study aims to investigate lattice radiotherapy (LRT) for bulky tumor in 10 patients, analyzing geometrical and dosimetrical parameters and correlations among variables. MethodsPatients were prescribed a single-fraction of 18 Gy to 50 % of each spherical vertex (1.5 cm diameter). Vertices were arranged in equidistant planes forming a triangular pattern. Center-to-center distance (Dc-c) between vertices was varied from 4 to 5 cm. A new method for calculating the valley-to-peak dose ratio (VPDR) was proposed and compared to other two from existing literature. GTV volumes (VGTV), vertex number (Nvert), low-dose related parameters and vertex D99%, D50%, and D1% were recorded. Beam-on time and Monitor Units (MU) were also evaluated. Correlations were assessed using Spearman’s coefficient, with significant differences analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. ResultsTumor volumes ranged from 417 to 3615 cm3. Median vertex number was 14.5 (IQR:11.3–17.8). VPDR ranged from 0.16 to 0.28. Median D99% spanned from 10.0 to 13.7 Gy, median D50% exceeded 18.0 Gy, and median D1% surpassed 23.3 Gy. Periphery dose remained under 4.0 Gy. Plans exhibited high modulation, with median beam-on time and MU of 8.8 min (IQR:8.2–10.1) and 13,069 MU (IQR:11574–13639). Significant correlations were found between Nvert and VGTV (p < 0.01), MU (p < 0.02) and beam-on time (p < 0.01) and between Dc-c and two VPDR definitions (p < 0.02) and periphery dose (p < 0.01). Significant differences were observed among the three valley dose definitions (p < 0.01) and the three peak dose definitions (p < 0.01). ConclusionsReporting geometrical and dosimetrical parameters in LRT is crucial, alongside the need for unified definitions of valley and peak doses.

Predicting Tumor Dynamics Post-Staged GKRS: Machine Learning Models in Brain Metastases Prognosis.

This study assesses the predictive performance of six machine learning models and a 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in forecasting tumor dynamics within three months following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in 77 brain metastasis (BM) patients. The analysis meticulously evaluates each model before and after hyperparameter tuning, utilizing accuracy, AUC, and other metrics derived from confusion matrices. The CNN model showcased notable performance with an accuracy of 98% and an AUC of 0.97, effectively complementing the broader model analysis. Initial findings highlighted that XGBoost significantly outperformed other models with an accuracy of 0.95 and an AUC of 0.95 before tuning. Post-tuning, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) demonstrated the most substantial improvement, achieving an accuracy of 0.98 and an AUC of 0.98. Conversely, XGBoost showed a decline in performance after tuning, indicating potential overfitting. The study also explores feature importance across models, noting that features like "control at one year", "age of the patient", and "beam-on time for volume V1 treated" were consistently influential across various models, albeit their impacts were interpreted differently depending on the model's underlying mechanics. This comprehensive evaluation not only underscores the importance of model selection and hyperparameter tuning but also highlights the practical implications in medical diagnostic scenarios, where the accuracy of positive predictions can be crucial. Our research explores the effects of staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) on larger tumors, revealing no significant outcome differences across protocols. It uniquely considers the impact of beam-on time and fraction intervals on treatment efficacy. However, the investigation is limited by a small patient cohort and data from a single institution, suggesting the need for future multicenter research.

A scattering-foil free electron beam to increase dose rate for total skin electron therapy (TSET).

Electron beams are used at extended distances ranging between 300 to 700cm to uniformly cover the entirety of the patient's skin for total skin electron therapy (TSET). Even with electron beams utilizing the high dose rate total skin electron (HDTSe) mode from the Varian 23iX or TrueBeam accelerators, the dose rate is only 2500 cGy/min at source-to-surface distance (SSD)=100cm. At extended distances, the decrease in dose rate leads to long beam delivery times that can limit or even prevent the use of the treatment for patients who, in their weakened condition, may be unable to stand on their own for extended periods of time. Previously, to increase dose rate, a customized 6 MeV electron beam was created by removing the x-ray target, flattening filter, beam monitor chamber, and so forth. from the beam path (Chen, et at IJROBP 59, 2004) for TSET. Using this scattering-foil free (SFF) electron beam requires the treatment distance be extended to 700cm to achieve dose uniformity from the single beam. This room size requirement has limited the widespread use of the 6 MeV-SFF beam. This study explores an application of a dual-field technique with a 6 MeV-SFF beam to provide broad and uniform electron fields to reduce the treatment distances in order to overcome treatment room size limitations. The EGSnrc system was used to generate incident beams. Gantry angles between 6 MeV-SFF dual-fields were optimized to achieve the similar patient skin dose distribution resulting from a standard 6 MeV-HDTSe dual-field configuration. The patient skin dose comparisons were performed based on the patient treatment setup geometries using dose-volume-histograms. Similar dose coverage can be achieved between 6 MeV-SFF and 6 MeV-HDTSe beams by reducing gantry angles between dual-field geometries by 8° and 7° at treatment distances of 400 and 500cm, respectively. To achieve 95% mean dose to the first 5mm of skin depth in the torso area, the mean dose to depths of 5-10mm and 10-15mm below the skin surface was 74% (74%) and 49% (50%) of the prescribed dose when using 6 MeV-SFF (6 MeV-HDTSe) beam, respectively. The 6 MeV-SFF electron beam is feasible to provide similar TSET skin dose coverage at SSD ≥ 400cm using a dual-field technique. The dose rate of the 6 MeV-SFF beam is about 4 times that of current available 6 MeV-HDTSe beams at treatment distances of 400-500cm, which significantly shortens the treatment beam-on time and makes TSET available to patients in weakened conditions.

Dosimetric comparison of HyperArc and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans in treating single and multiple brain metastases.

This study aimed to compare the dosimetric attributes of two multi-leaf collimator based techniques, HyperArc and Incise CyberKnife, in the treatment of brain metastases. 17 cases of brain metastases were selected including 6 patients of single lesion and 11 patients of multiple lesions. Treatment plans of HyperArc and CyberKnife were designed in Eclipse 15.5 and Precision 1.0, respectively, and transferred to Velocity 3.2 for comparison. HyperArc plans provided superior Conformity Index (0.91±0.06vs. 0.77±0.07, p<0.01) with reduced dose distribution in organs at risk (Dmax, p<0.05) and lower normal tissue exposure (V4Gy-V20Gy, p<0.05) in contrast to CyberKnife plans, although the Gradient Indexes were similar. CyberKnife plans showed higher Homogeneity Index (1.54±0.17vs. 1.39±0.09, p<0.05) and increased D2% and D50% in the target (p<0.05). Additionally, HyperArc plans had significantly fewer Monitor Units (MUs) and beam-on time (p<0.01). HyperArc plans demonstrated superior performance compared with MLC-based CyberKnife plans in terms of conformity and the sparing of critical organs and normal tissues, although no significant difference in GI outcomes was noted. Conversely, CyberKnife plans achieved a higher target dose and HI. The study suggests that HyperArc is more efficient and particularly suitable for treating larger lesions in brain metastases.

Influence of the Planning Parameters of a New Algorithm on the Dosimetric Quality, Beam-on Time and Delivery Accuracy of Tomotherapy Plans

Background: This work aimed to determine the optimum VOLOTM Ultra algorithm parameters for tomotherapy treatments. Methods: 1056 treatment plans were generated with VOLOTM Ultra for 36 patients and six anatomical locations. The impact of varying four parameters was studied: the accelerated treatment (AT), leaf open/close time (LOT) cutoff, normal tissue objective (NTO) weight, and number of iterations. The beam-on time and dosimetric metrics were quantified for the target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). Delivery quality assurance measurements were obtained for 36 plans to assess the delivery accuracy. Results: The mean beam-on time for the helical tomotherapy and TomoDirect (TD) plans decreased by 26.6 ± 2.8% and 17.4 ± 4.3%, respectively, when the accelerated treatment parameter was increased from 0 to 10, at the expense of the planning target volume (PTV) coverage (2% lower D98%) and OAR dose (up to 15% increase). For TD plans, it seems preferable to systematically use an AT value of 10. Increasing the number of iterations beyond six seems unnecessary. In this study, an NTO weight of approximately 10 appears to be ideal and eliminates the need to use rings in the treatment plan. Finally, no correlation was found between the leaf open/close time cutoff and the delivery accuracy, while a leaf open/close cutoff of 60 ms seemed to degrade dosimetry quality. Conclusion: Optimal values for the AT, LOT cutoff, NTO weight, and number of optimization rounds were identified and should help improve the management of patients whose tomotherapy treatments are planned with VOLOTM Ultra.

Comprehensively evaluating the performance of Elekta high-definition dynamic radiosurgery for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

PurposeTo evaluate the dosimetric and delivery performance of Elekta high-definition dynamic radiosurgery (HDRS) in hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for multiple brain metastases (BMs) by comparison with a conventional single-isocenter noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique using the RayStation treatment planning system (TPS). Materials and methodsFrom June 2022 to October 2023, thirty-two patients (a total of 140 BMs) treated with HSRT (30–48 Gy/3-6f) via HDRS-based single-isocenter noncoplanar VMAT (HDRS-VMAT) were retrospectively selected for this study. Each patient was replanned using RayStation TPS-based single-isocenter noncoplanar VMAT (RayStation-VMAT). HDRS-VMAT and RayStation-VMAT plans were compared in terms of the gradient index (GI), conformity index (CI), normal brain tissue (NBT) dose exposure, monitor units (MUs), homogeneity index (HI), delivery accuracy, and beam-on time (BOT). ResultsCompared with the RayStation-VMAT plan, the HDRS-VMAT plan achieved superior CI (1.14 ± 0.09 vs. 1.23 ± 0.12, P < 0.001) and GI (5.23 ± 1.18 vs. 7.83 ± 2.75, p < 0.001) but had greater HI values. Compared with the RyaStation-VMAT plan, the HDRS-VMAT plan also yielded significantly lower NBT dose exposures (V23Gy, V21Gy, V18Gy, V12Gy and Dmean) but at the cost of increased MUs (3659.16 ± 1225.28 vs. 2536.23 ± 785.80, p < 0.001). The difference in BOTs was minimal (<1 min), which was not considered clinically significant. Furthermore, the HDRS-VMAT exhibited a higher gamma passing rate across all criteria (P < 0.001), particularly under stricter criteria (2%/1 mm), achieving an approximately 3% increase. ConclusionCompared with RaySation-VMAT, HDRS-VMAT offers superior target conformity, better NBT sparing, and higher delivery accuracy while maintaining comparable delivery efficiency. This represents a promising approach for HSRT of multiple BMs.

Feasibility of a Single-Fraction Stereotactic Dose of 30 Gy to Solitary Lung Lesions on Halcyon.

Purpose We sought to explore the feasibility of using the current co-planar Halcyon ring delivery system (RDS) with a novel multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture shape controller in delivering a single high dose of 30 Gy to solitary lung lesions via stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods Thirteen non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with a single dose of 30 Gy to lung lesions via SBRT on the TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs were anonymized and replanned onto the Halcyon RDS (6MV-FFF) following RTOG-0915 single-fraction criteria. The Halcyon plans utilized a novel dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based MLC-fitting approach before VMAT optimization with a user-defined aperture shape controller option. The clinical TrueBeam and Halcyon plans were compared via their protocol compliance, target conformity, gradient index, and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). Treatment delivery efficacy and accuracy were assessed through end-to-end quality assurance (QA) tests on Halcyon and independent dose verification via in-house Monte Carlo (MC) second-check validation. Results All Halcyon lung SBRT plans met RTOG-0915 protocol's requirements for target coverage, conformity, and gradient indices, and maximum dose 2 cm away from the target (D2cm) while being statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) when compared to clinical TrueBeam plans. Additionally, Halcyon provided a similar dose to OAR except for the ribs, where Halcyon demonstrated a lower maximum dose (15.22 Gy vs 17.01 Gy, p < 0.001). However, Halcyon plans required a higher total monitor unit (8892 MU vs 7413 MU, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher beam modulation factor (2.96 MU/cGy vs 2.47 MU/cGy, p < 0.001) and an increase in beam-on time by a factor of 2.1 (11.11 min vs 5.3 min, p < 0.005). End-to-end QA measurements demonstrate that Halcyon plans were clinically acceptable with an average gamma passing rate of 99.8% for 2%/2mm criteria and independent MC 2nd checks within ±2.86%. Conclusion Our end-to-end testing and validation study demonstrates that by utilizing a DCA-based MLC aperture shape controller before VMAT optimization, Halcyon can be used for delivering a single dose of lung SBRT treatment. However, future improvements of Halcyon RDS are recommended to allow higher output rates, rotational couch corrections, and an integrated intrafraction motion management system that will further enhance Halcyon's capability for site-specific single dosage of SBRT.

Dosimetry and treatment efficiency of SBRT using TaiChiB radiotherapy system for two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk.

This study aims to assess the dosimetry and treatment efficiency of TaiChiB-based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) plans applying to treat two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk. For four retrospective patients diagnosed with two-lung lesions each patient, four treatment plans were designed including Plan Edge, TaiChiB linac-based, RGS-based, and a linac-RGS hybrid (Plan TCLinac, Plan TCRGS, and Plan TCHybrid). Dosimetric metrics and beam-on time were employed to evaluate and compare the TaiChiB-based plans against Plan Edge. For Conformity Index (CI), Plan TCRGS outperformed all other plans with an average CI of 1.06, as opposed to Plan Edge's 1.33. Similarly, for R50%, Plan TCRGS was superior with an average R50% of 3.79, better than Plan Edge's 4.28. In terms of D2 cm, Plan TCRGS also led with an average of 48.48%, compared to Plan Edge's 56.25%. For organ at risk (OAR) sparing, Plan TCRGS often displayed the lowest dosimetric values, notably for the spinal cord (Dmax 5.92 Gy) and lungs (D1500cc 1.00 Gy, D1000cc 2.61 Gy, V10 Gy 15.14%). However, its high Dmax values for the heart and great vessels sometimes exceeded safety thresholds. Plan TCHybrid presented a balanced approach, showing doses comparable to or better than Plan Edge without crossing safety limits. In terms of beam-on time, Plan TCLinac emerged as the most efficient treatment option in three out of four cases, followed closely by Plan Edge in one case. Plan TCRGS, despite its dosimetric advantages, was the least efficient, recording notably longer beam-on times, with a peak at 33.28 minutes in Case 2. For patients with two-lung lesions treated by SBRT whose one lesion overlaps with OARs, the Plan TCHybrid delivered by TaiChiB digital radiotherapy system can be recommended as a clinical option.

IMRT Planning Using 5, 7 and 9 Radiation Field Directions for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Cases

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the deadliest cancers in the world. In treating NPC, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) uses radiation fields from several directions to kill cancer cells and shrink tumours. IMRT requires accurate planning using the Treatment Planning System (TPS) to avoid organs at risk (OARs) around the nasopharyngeal cavity. The purpose of this study is to analyse the results of different number of radiation field directions in treatment planning for nasopharyngeal cancer using IMRT. The study focuses on the distribution of dose in the target tumour and organs at risk around the target. The treatment planning parameters are Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), Conformity Index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI), dose at organs at risk (OARs) and beam on time (BOT). This study used TPS Monaco with the Monte Carlo algorithm and the inverse planning method. Based on DVH, CI, HI and BOT parameters, the results of this study indicate that the most optimal number of radiation field directions to give prescribed doses was 9 radiation field directions. There was no significant difference in the average dose received by OARs in planning with 7 and 9 radiation field directions. In the planning using 5 field directions, some of the OARs received doses above the tolerance limit. While in the planning using 7 and 9 field directions, most of the OARs received doses below the tolerated doses which met the permitted treatment requirements.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy of central lung tumours using a 1.5 T MR-linac: First clinical experiences

BackgroundMRI-guidance may aid better discrimination between Organs at Risk (OARs) and target volumes in proximity of the mediastinum. We report the first clinical experiences with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of (ultra)central lung tumours on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Materials and MethodsPatients with an (ultra)central lung tumour were selected for MR-linac based SBRT treatment. A T2-weighted 3D sequence MRI acquired during free breathing was used for daily plan adaption. Prior to each fraction, contours of Internal Target Volume (ITV) and OARs were deformably propagated and amended by a radiation oncologist. Inter-fractional changes in volumes and coverage of target volumes as well as doses in OARs were evaluated in offline and online treatment plans. ResultsTen patients were treated and completed 60 Gy in 8 or 12 fractions. In total 104 fractions were delivered. The median time in the treatment room was 41 min with a median beam-on time of 8.9 min. No grade ≥3 acute toxicity was observed. In two patients, the ITV significantly decreased during treatment (58 % and 37 %, respectively) due to tumour shrinkage. In the other patients, 81 % of online ITVs were within ±15 % of the volume of fraction 1. Comparison with the pre-treatment plan showed that ITV coverage of the online plan was similar in 52 % and improved in 34 % of cases. Adaptation to meet OAR constraints, led to decreased ITV coverage in 14 %. ConclusionsWe describe the workflow for MR-guided Radiotherapy and the feasibility of using 1.5 T MR-linac for SBRT of (ultra) central lung tumours.

Dosimetric evaluation of LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with more than 20 targets: comparing MME, HyperArc, and RapidArc

BackgroundTo compare the dosimetric quality of three widely used techniques for LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) with more than 20 targets: dynamic conformal arc (DCA) in BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME) module and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA) in Varian Eclipse.MethodsTen patients who received single-isocenter fSRS with 20–37 targets were retrospectively replanned using MME, RA, and HA. Various dosimetric parameters, such as conformity index (CI), Paddick CI, gradient index (GI), normal brain dose exposures, maximum organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and beam-on times were extracted and compared among the three techniques. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsAll plans achieved the prescribed dose coverage goal of at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). HA plans showed superior conformity compared to RA and MME plans. MME plans showed superior GI compared to RA and HA plans. RA plans resulted in significantly higher low and intermediate dose exposure to normal brain compared to HA and MME plans, especially for lower doses of ≥ 8Gy and ≥ 5Gy. No significant differences were observed in the maximum dose to OARs among the three techniques. The beam-on time of MME plans was about two times longer than RA and HA plans.ConclusionsHA plans achieved the best conformity, while MME plans achieved the best dose fall-off for LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction SRS with more than 20 targets. The choice of the optimal technique should consider the trade-offs between dosimetric quality, beam-on time, and planning effort.

Plan quality assessment of modern radiosurgery technologies in the treatment of multiple brain metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases has evolved over the last 40 years allowing centres to treat an increasing number of brain metastases in a single treatment fraction. HyperArcTM planning optimisation technique is one such development that streamlines the treatment of multiple metastases with a single isocentre. Several studies have investigated the plan quality of HyperArc compared to CyberKnife or Gamma Knife, however there are limited number of studies that include all three modalities. It is the aim of this study to provide an assessment of plan quality between the three SRS platforms across ten patients with multiple brain metastases ranging from three to eight metastases per patient. Strict planning workflows were established to avoid bias towards any particular treatment platform. Plan quality was assessed through dose to organs at risk, Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI), global efficiency index (Gη) and dose to normal brain tissue. Results from this study found mean PCI observed across Gamma Knife plans was significantly lower than HyperArc and CyberKnife. HyperArc plans observed significantly shorter beam-on times which were 10 to 20 times faster than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife plans. Gamma Knife and CyberKnife were found to produce plans with significantly superior GI, global efficiency index and the volume of healthy brain receiving greater than 12 Gy (V12Gy) when compared to HyperArc plans. Lesion volume was seen to influence the relative difference in dose metrics between systems. The study revealed that all three treatment modalities produced high quality plans for the SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases, each with respective benefits and limitations.

Clinical Outcomes of Prostate SBRT Using Non-adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is widely used for localized prostate cancer and implementation of MR-guided radiotherapy has the advantage of tighter margins and improved sparing of organs at risk. Here we evaluate outcomes and time required to treat using non-adaptive MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) for localized prostate cancer at our institution. From 9/2019 to 11/2021 we conducted a retrospective review of 80 consecutive patients who were treated with MRgSBRT to the prostate. Patients included low (LR) (5%), favorable intermediate (FIR) (40%), unfavorable intermediate (UIR) (49%), and high risk (HR) (6%). Short-term androgen deprivation therapy was used in 32% of patients. Target volumes included prostate gland and proximal seminal vesicles with an isotropic 3mm margin. Treatment was prescribed to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions every other day with urethral sparing. Hydrogel spacer was used in 18% of patients. Time on the linac was recorded as beam on time (BOT) plus total treatment time (TTT) including gating. Analyzed outcomes included PSA response and patient reported outcomes scored by the American Urological Association (AUA) questionnaire and toxicity per CTCAE v5. General linear regression model was used to analyze factors affecting PSA and AUA in longitudinal follow up, and chi-square test was used to assess factors affecting toxicity. Median follow up was 19.3months (3.8 - 36.6). Median BOT was 4.6min (2.6 - 7.2) with a median TTT of 11 min (7.6 - 15.8). Pre-treatment vs post-RT median PSA was 6.36 (2.20 - 19.6) vs 0.85 (0.19 - 3.6), respectively (P < 0.001). PSA decrease differed significantly when patients were stratified by risk category, favoring LR/FIR vs UIF/HR group (P = 0.019). Four (5%) patients experienced a biochemical failure (BCF), with a median time to BCF of 20.4months (7.9 - 34.5). Median biochemical failure free survival (BCFFS) was not reached, with 2-yr and 4-yr BCFFS of 97.1% and 72.1%, respectively. Patients with LR/FIR disease had 100% 2-yr and 4-yr BCFFS, whereas patients with UIF/HR had 95% and 41% 2-yr and 4-yr BCFFS (P = 0.05). Mean pre-treatment AUA was 7.3 (1 - 25) vs 11.3 (1 - 26) at first follow-up; however, AUA normalized to baseline over time. Urethral Dmax ≥35Gy trended to lower AUA score at all follow-ups (P = 0.07). Forty-one (51%) patients reported grade 1-2 genitourinary toxicities at the 1 month follow up. Grade 3 toxicity (proctitis) was noted in 1 patient. There was no decrease in any grade rectal toxicity with use of hydrogel spacer (3 vs 6, P = 0.2). No grade ≥4 toxicities was observed. MRgSBRT has the potential for treatment adaptation but this comes at the cost of increased resource utilization. Our experience with non-adaptive MRgSBRT of the prostate highlights its short treatment times as well as efficacy with good PSA control and low toxicity profile.

Impact of biologically effective dose on tremor decrease after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy for essential tremor: a retrospective longitudinal analysis

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the surgical alternatives for drug-resistant essential tremor (ET). Here, we aimed at evaluating whether biologically effective dose (BEDGy2.47) is relevant for tremor improvement after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy in a population of patients treated with one (unplugged) isocenter and a uniform dose of 130 Gy. This is a retrospective longitudinal single center study. Seventy-eight consecutive patients were clinically analyzed. Mean age was 69.1 years (median 71, range 36–88). Mean follow-up period was 14 months (median 12, 3–36). Tremor improvement was assessed at 12 months after SRS using the ET rating assessment scale (TETRAS, continuous outcome) and binary (binary outcome). BED was defined for an alpha/beta of 2.47, based upon previous studies considering such a value for the normal brain. Mean BED was 4573.1 Gy2.47 (median 4612, 4022.1–4944.7). Mean beam-on time was 64.7 min (median 61.4; 46.8–98.5). There was a statically significant correlation between delta (follow-up minus baseline) in TETRAS (total) with BED (p = 0.04; beta coefficient − 0.029) and beam-on time (p = 0.03; beta coefficient 0.57) but also between TETRAS (ADL) with BED (p = 0.02; beta coefficient 0.038) and beam-on time (p = 0.01; beta coefficient 0.71). Fractional polynomial multivariate regression suggested that a BED > 4600 Gy2.47 and a beam-on time > 70 min did not further increase clinical efficacy (binary outcome). Adverse radiation events (ARE) were defined as larger MR signature on 1-year follow-up MRI and were present in 7 out of 78 (8.9%) cases, receiving a mean BED of 4650 Gy2.47 (median 4650, range 4466–4894). They were clinically relevant with transient hemiparesis in 5 (6.4%) patients, all with BED values higher than 4500 Gy2.47. Tremor improvement was correlated with BED Gy2.47 after SRS for drug-resistant ET. An optimal BED value for tremor improvement was 4300–4500 Gy2.47. ARE appeared for a BED of more than 4500 Gy2.47. Such finding should be validated in larger cohorts.

Stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial tumor beds on a ring-mounted Halcyon LINAC.

This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the Halcyon Ring Delivery System (RDS) for delivering stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatments for intracranial tumors beds. Ten previously treated brain SRT patients for 30Gy in five fractions with non-coplanar HyperArc plans on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) were replanned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF) using the same number of arcs and Eclipse's AcurosXB dose engine. Plan quality evaluation metrics per SRT protocol included: PTV coverage, GTV dose (minimum and mean), target conformity indices (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), maximum dose 2cm away from the PTV (D2cm), and doses to organs-at-risk (OAR). Additionally, patient-specific quality assurance (QA) results and beam-on-time (BOT) were analyzed. The Halcyon RDS provided highly conformal SRT plans for intracranial tumor beds with similar dose to target. When benchmarked against clinically delivered HyperArc plans, target coverage, CI(s) and HI were statistically similar. The Halcyon plans saw no statistical difference in maximum OAR doses to the brainstem, spinal cord, and cochlea. Due to the machine's coplanar geometry, the Halcyon plans showed a decrease in optic pathway dose (0.75Gy vs. 2.08Gy, p=0.029). Overall, Halcyon's coplanar geometry resulted in a larger GI (3.33vs. 2.72, p=0.008) and a larger D2cm (39.59%vs. 29.07%, p<0.001). In this cohort, multiple cases had the PTV and the optic pathway in the same axial plane. In one such instance, the PTV was<2cm away from the optic pathway but even at this close proximity OAR, Halcyon still adequately spared the optic pathway. Additionally, the Halcyon's geometry provided slightly larger amount of normal brain dose receiving 24.4Gy (8.99 cc vs. 7.36 cc) and 28.8Gy (2.9 cc vs. 2.5 cc), although statistically insignificant. The Halcyon plans achieved similar delivery accuracy, quantified by patient-specific QA results evaluated with a 2%/2mm gamma criteria (99.42%vs. 99.70%). For both plans, independent Monte Carlo second checks calculation agreed within 1%. Average Halcyon BOT was slightly higher by 0.35min (p=0.045), however, due to the one-step patient set-up and verification overall estimated treatment times on Halcyon were lower compared to HyperArc treatments (7.61min vs. 10.26min, p<0.001). When benchmarked against clinically delivered HyperArc treatments, the Halcyon brain SRT plans provided similar plan quality and delivery accuracy but achieved faster overall treatment times. We have started treating select brain SRT patients on the Halcyon RDS for patients having tumor beds greater than 1cm in diameter with the closest OAR distance of greater than 2cm away from the target. We recommend other clinics to consider commissioning SRT treatments on their Halcyon systems-allowing including remote Halcyon-only clinics to provide exceptionally high-quality therapeutic brain SRT treatments to an otherwise underserved patient cohort.