<b>Objective:</b> We sought to establish the reliability and validity of a novel composite cognitive endpoint for monitoring improvement in memory and processing speed in future drug trials. <b>Background</b> Approximately 50% of all patients with Multiple Sclerosis have clinically significant symptoms of cognitive impairment that impact their ability to work and interfere with the quality of their home life and leisure activities. FDA officials have approved composite cognitive endpoints for the study of drug interventions for Alzheimer9s (ADAS-COG) and Schizophrenia (MATRICS), but not MS. <b>Design/Methods:</b> We administered the Selective Reminding Test (SRT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, Revised, PASAT, and SDMT to 60 MS patients at 4 centers twice over a 45 day timespan. These measures were chosen based on their known sensitivity to MS cognitive symptoms, the availability of alternate forms and known cross-cultural utility. Norm-referenced data was used to study the test-retest reliability of each measure. A composite measure for use as an endpoint in a drug trial was constructed based on factor structure. <b>Results:</b> Test-retest reliability for individual subtests ranged from r = .62 for the SRT delayed recall trial to .88 for the SDMT. A general composite representative of performance across measures had reliability of .91. Processing Speed and Memory composite indices were r =.89 and r =.86, respectively with modest practice effects. Secondary Progressive patients performed approximately .8 standard deviations below Relapsing-Remitting patients, with the two populations demonstrating cognitive impairment with frequencies 77% and 39%, respectively. Cognitive impairment correlated reasonably well (r = .40) with Informant reports on the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire. <b>Conclusions:</b> The novel composite endpoint is a reliable, repeatable measure of general cognitive functioning that is sensitive to cognitive impairment in both Secondary Progressive and Relapsing –Remitting MS patients. Supported by: Biogen-Idec. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. DeLuca has received personal compensation for activities with Kessler Foundation Research Center and Biogen Idec.Dr. DeLuca has received research support from Biogen Idec. Dr. Foley has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec. Dr. Foley has received research support from Bayer Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Benedict has received personal compensation for activities with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Biogen Idec, Serono, Inc., Novartis, Merck & Co., Inc. and Pfizer Inc as speaker, consultant and/or member on advisory panel. Dr. Benedict has received research support from Memen Pharmaceuticals, Shire Pharmaceuticals and Biogen Idec. Dr. Caruso has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec as a consultant. Dr. Caruso has received research support from Biogen Idec. Dr. Erlanger has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec as a consultant. Dr. Erlanger has received research support from Biogen Idec. Dr. Kaushik has received personal compensation for activities with Panmedix as a research coordinator. Dr. Kaushik has received research support from Biogen-Idec.