Baux Score Research Articles

Outcomes of burn patients presenting with hypotension within 48 hrs of admission to a level 1 Burn Centre

IntroductionBurns is one of the important presentations in trauma surgery in both first and third-world countries. Hypotension is often seen in the clinical presentation of a burn injury. Hypotension is the strongest independent predictor of an adverse outcome, according to a study done on emergency departments’ hospital outcomes; the lower the systolic, the worse the outcome. No direct study shows that presenting with or developing hypotension within 48hrs of admission and burn injury will have a worse outcome in our low-middle income setting. ObjectivesTo determine the outcomes of burn patients who developed hypotension within 48hrs of arrival at a Burn Centre in Johannesburg. In a singled time event. MethodsA retrospective descriptive study was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Centre Burn unit in Johannesburg from 01 Jan 2019 – 31 Dec 2020. Patients who had a hypotensive episode at any point during the 48 h period were recruited. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure of less than 90mmhg. The patients were then divided into two groups: those who presented with or developed hypotension within 48hrs and those who did not. After that, the in-hospital mortality of both groups was to be determined. The study included all the patients who presented to the Burn Centre. Those younger than 18, or requiring readmission in the same study or delayed admissions of more than 24 h were excluded. Demographics, burn information, resuscitation data, outcomes and disposition status were evaluated. The STATA Statistics/Data Analysis version 16.0 was used to analyse the data. The level of significance was set at a p-value < 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand with the clearance number: M220132. ResultsOf the 132 patients seen, only 105 met the study inclusion criteria. Most patients were male: 91/105 (86.6 %). Flame burns accounted for the majority of the burns, 64/105 (60.95 %), followed by electrical burns, 26/105 (24.76 %). Hot water and chemical burns only accounted for 11/105 (10.48 %) and 4 (3.81 %) cases. Hypotension within 48hrs was noted in 37/105(35 %) of the cases. Hypotensive patients had an increased burn depth (p = 0.03), higher inhalation rate component (p = <0.001), greater lactate levels(p = 0.00001), higher baux score(p = 0.00001) and more likelihood of being placed on the ventilator (p = <0.00001) or dialysis (p = 0.008). Mortality was noted in 16 (43 %) of the patients who developed hypotension compared to 5 (7.4 %) patients of non-hypotensive patients (p < 0.001). The mortality of patients who presented with or developed hypotension was 9.59 times (95 % CI 3.1–29.4; p = 0.00001) higher than those who did not develop hypotension. Age and TBSA affected by burn, were found to have significant predictive value for mortality (p < 0.0001), respectively. Propensity matching was limited due to sample size. TBSA and the development of hypotension were matched, and the odds ratio of developing mortality was still increased. ConclusionHypotension was seen among burn injury patients admitted to a specialized intensive care unit. Hypotension was associated with higher TBSA % and increased age. In terms of characteristics, increased used of organ support was more likely with hypotensive patients with ventilation, inotropes, and dialysis. Length of stay was decreased in hypotensive patients. The odds of mortality were much higher in hypotensive patients, with age and TBSA being significant variables.

Role of the revised Baux score in predicting mortality among burn patients in an African low-income country: a multicentre prospective cohort.

Burn injury is a major cause of mortality. Majority of the burns occur in low and middle-income countries like Uganda. Uganda has a limited number of burn centres and medical resources, making a predictor of mortality necessary in allocation of the limited resources. Although the revised Baux (r-Baux) score has been validated and used in many high income countries, no study has assessed its role in an African low-income country; the reason this study was done. This was a prospective multicentre cohort that enroled 101 burn patients with moderate and severe burns admitted in three tertiary hospitals in western Uganda. Follow-up was done until discharge, documenting mortality. A receiver operator characteristic curve was used to determine the role of r-Baux score in predicting mortality. This study included 101 patients, with a mean age of 21.3 (SD=16.8) years. The majority of the participants were male (69.3%). The area under the curved for r-Baux score's prediction of mortality was 0.943 (P<0.001). The most appropriate cut-off was determined to be 74.5. At this cut-off, r-Baux score predicted mortality with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 83.5%. After controlling for burn severity using Poisson regression, a patient with r-Baux score greater than 74.5 was 1.358 times more likely to die (adjusted risk ratio=1.358, 95% CI=1.195-1.543, P<0.001). The r-Baux score was found to be excellent at predicting mortality among burn patients in Uganda and therefore should be done for all patients at admission, in order to predict mortality and do proper planning.

Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis: A 10 year experience of outcome monitoring in a regional burn centre

IntroductionOutcome monitoring can identify fluctuations in healthcare. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis can detect when mortality deviates from expected, allowing early intervention through targeted audit. We present a 10-year experience of the prospective use of CUSUM methodology in a regional burn centre. MethodProspective outcome monitoring was conducted for all admissions to the intensive care unit between 2012 and 2022. The revised Baux score was used for mortality risk prediction. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts tracked mortality against that predicted by the revised Baux score. Deviations from expected outcomes triggered detailed structured analysis. Learning outcomes were identified from internal and external governance groups. ResultsCUSUM analysis was triggered on eight occasions: one paediatric (excess deaths), six adult (four excess survivors, two excess deaths) and one elderly (excess survivors). Detailed analysis identified areas for continuous improvement and positive themes from excess survivors. ConclusionThe use of CUSUM as an early warning trigger stimulates assessment of practice and critical appraisal of factors contributing to unexpected mortality or survival. The revised Baux score at its foundation needs to be carefully considered but remains a valid model. One benefit is positive reinforcement of team cohesion and morale during periods of care excellence leading to excess survivors.

Adipokines-A Cohort Prospective Study in Children with Severe Burns.

Burns generate every year an important burden of morbidity, being a major global public health problem through prolonged hospitalization, complications, and increased mortality. This study's purpose was to evaluate the serum levels of three adipokines and to establish significant correlations with other circulating molecules and with some clinical parameters. We evaluated 32 children with severe burns (over 25% total burned surface area-TBSA) at 48 h, day 10, and day 21 post burn, and 21 controls. The serum levels of adiponectin, resistin, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (among nine other biochemical parameters) were detected by Multiplex technique. Significant statistical differences were obtained for resistin and leptin compared to the control group, in different moments of measurements. Adiponectin serum levels presented statistically significant correlations with hot liquid mechanism of burn, the Revised Baux score, TBSA, resistin, PAI-1, CRP, TNF-α, and triglycerides (TGLs) serum levels. Resistin serum levels presented statistically significant correlations with adiponectin, CRP, PAI-1, leptin, and TNF-α. Additionally, we found statistically significant correlations between leptin serum levels and length of hospitalization, TNF-α, resistin, adiponectin, and PAI-1 serum levels. In severely burned children, adiponectin, resistin, and leptin specifically correlate with clinical parameters and with proteins involved in the systemic inflammatory response and the hypermetabolic response.

Burn Mortality in an Appalachian Referral Center: An Examination of Mortality Prediction Scores in a 13-Year Retrospective Study.

Introduction Burn injuries have profound implications, prompting the use of various mortality scoring systems. This study aimed to evaluate their effectiveness within our Appalachian burn referral center, which serves as the sole burn center in the state of West Virginia. Given this unique status, understanding the efficacy of mortality scoring systems within our center is crucial for resource allocation and optimizing patient outcomes in our region. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to Cabell Huntington Hospital Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) from January 2010 to June 2023 was conducted, assessing Baux (B), revised Baux (rB), Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury (BOBI), and Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) scores. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis were employed to examine survival status and determine optimal cut points. Results Among 1,104 patients, 57 died (5% mortality rate). Deceased patients had significantly higher B/rB/BOBI scores (mean: 98/98/92) than survivors (45/46/4.19) (p < 0.001), with ABSI showing no significance (p = 0.079). Each one-point increase in B/rB/BOBI scores correlated with a 1.09/1.09/2.34 times higher mortality risk (p < 0.001). The AUC for B score in predicting mortality was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.890, 0.962), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.789 and 0.92, respectively, and an optimal cutoff point of 79. The AUC for the rB score was 0.927 (95% CI: 0.892, 0.962), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.789 and 0.926, respectively, and an optimal cutoff point of 80. The AUC for the BOBI score was 0.901 (95% CI: 0.865, 0.937), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.895 and 0.775, respectively, and an optimal cutoff point of 2. For patients with B scores above 79, their odds of mortality were 42.6 times higher than those with B scores of 79 or lower (95% CI: 22.6, 85.6, p < 0.001). Similarly, for patients with rB scores exceeding 80, their odds of mortality were 42.9 times higher than those with rB scores of 80 or lower (95% CI: 22.9, 84.8, p < 0.001). Finally, for patients with BOBI scores greater than 2, their odds of mortality were 17.8 times higher than those with BOBI scores of 2 or lower (95% CI: 9.88, 33.4, p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study underscores the vital role of mortality scoring systems in guiding clinical decision-making and resource allocation for burn patients, particularly within the Appalachian region served by the Cabell Huntington Hospital BICU. By leveraging tools such as the Baux, revised Baux, and BOBI scores, healthcare providers can identify high-risk patients early in their treatment course, facilitating personalized interventions and improving overall patient outcomes. Moreover, our findings highlight the significance of age and total body surface area burned as key determinants of mortality risk, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches to care for elderly patients and those with extensive burns. Continued research and refinement of mortality scoring systems are essential to further enhance their effectiveness and ensure optimal patient care in the challenging field of burn management.

PROGNOSIS OF INHALATION INJURY MORTALITY RATE WITH REVISED BAUX SCORE AT DR. SOETOMO GENERAL ACADEMIC HOSPITAL, SURABAYA, INDONESIA (2019-2021)

Highlights: Fire is the most frequent cause of burns, while thermal contact is the least common. Mortality rate with revised Baux score in burn patients with inhalation injury showed a significant relationship. Abstract: Introduction: Burn trauma has quite a high mortality rate in Indonesia. One of the scoring systems that is straightforward to apply is the revised Baux score. However, there is no standardised scoring system that is currently in use in our institution. Therefore, the purpose is to determine the feasibility of using this scoring system in our population's features. Methods: This research is a retrospective study with research design case control design using secondary data in the form of medical record data from patients with acute burn trauma that were admitted to Burn Unit of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital in Surabaya between January 2019 and December 2021. All the data will be divided by their group and analysed with SPSS software. Results: The study found significant relationships between several factors and mortality rates among burn patients. Age, total burn surface area percentage, presence of inhalation injury, and the revised Baux Score all showed significant correlations with mortality rate (p &lt; 0.005). Specifically, among burn patients with inhalation injury, the correlation between mortality rate and revised Baux score remained significant (p=0.002). Conclusions:The study revealed that age, the percentage of total burn surface area, and the presence of inhalation injury are significantly associated with mortality rate among burn patients. Additionally, the revised Baux Score was identified as a useful tool for predicting the prognosis of burn patients with inhalation injury. These findings emphasize the importance of these factors in assessing and managing outcomes for burn patients, particularly those with inhalation injury.

Primary and specialty palliative care utilization at a regional Burn center.

There is little research informing appropriate specialty palliative care consultation over primary palliative care practice, or the ability of the burn surgeon to perform skills such as effective goals of care discussions. We sought to characterize patterns of palliative care utilization and hypothesized that greater modified Baux (mBaux) and systemic organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores would correlate with increased specialty palliative involvement but have no relationship with primary palliative involvement. A retrospective chart review was conducted at a regional burn center between 2020-2021 including patients admitted with burns or inhalation injury and a mBaux score over 60, detailing circumstances of palliative consultation and goals of care discussions. 163 patients met criteria. Odds of specialty palliative consultation increased by 3.9% for each additional mBaux score point and 23.3% for every SOFA score point. The odds of a goals of care discussion by a burn surgeon increased by 3.5% for each mBaux score point and 23.9% for each SOFA score point. Those receiving palliative consultation tended to have greater burn surface area, graft complications, code status changes, and more goals of care discussions by any provider at admission; there was no difference in symptom control or hospital length of stay. Higher mBaux and SOFA scores correlate with increased odds of both specialty and primary palliative involvement in our cohort. There is bias in diverting both primary and specialty palliative care resources toward acutely ill patients and those with less immediate projected mortality may need additional attention.

704 Hydroxocobalamin Is Not Associated with Methemoglobinemia in Patients with Inhalation Injury and Suspected Cyanide Toxicity

Abstract Introduction Cyanide poisoning is a serious threat to burn patients, especially those exposed to smoke from fires, often leading to cyanide toxicity and cardiovascular collapse. Cyanokit, a widely used hydroxocobalamin product able to convert cyanide molecules into safe compounds, is known for its potential to avoid methemoglobinemia, a side effect of other treatments. Concerns about cyanokit's safety, especially in burn patients, have arisen due to recent cases with elevated methemoglobin levels. This study investigates methemoglobin levels in burn patients treated with Cyanokit, aiming to enhance our understanding of cyanide antidote therapy complexities, ultimately leading to safer treatment strategies. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of burn patients admitted to a single institution from 2013-2023 with inhalation injury treated with cyanokit for suspected cyanide toxicity. We also analyzed a control cohort of similar patients with inhalation injury not treated with cyanokit. We analyzed changes and peaks in methemoglobin, lactate levels, kidney function tests, ventilator days, % total body surface area (TBSA), medications and dressings, and mortality. Results In the study, 36 patients with suspected inhalation injury were treated with cyanokit, compared to 32 patients with inhalation injury who weren't treated with cyanokit. Baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, including age, gender, BMI, and %TBSA. No significant differences were found in initial, final, peak, or change in methemoglobin levels, initial lactate levels, mortality, Baux score, kidney function tests, ventilator days, surgeries, or use of medications/treatments (e.g., Silvadene dressings, Vitamin C) between the two groups (Table 1). When controlling for covariates, multiple linear regression analysis (age, gender, and %TBSA) indicated that cyanokit administration was not significantly associated with changes in methemoglobin or mortality. Conclusions Contrary to our initial hypothesis, our study did not find significant harm or benefit of cyanokit in burn patients during the acute phase. Methemoglobin, lactate levels, mortality, and kidney function remained largely unchanged. This study's limitations, particularly the rarity of inhalation injury cases with concern for cyanide toxicity, warrant consideration. Further research is required to comprehensively elucidate the impact of cyanokit administration on burn patients' outcomes. Applicability of Research to Practice Given the high stakes involved in treating cyanide poisoning promptly, our study holds significance for refining treatment strategies and enhancing patient safety. This insight is vital for medical practitioners making critical decisions in managing cyanide poisoning in burn patients, while also underlining the need for further research to fully understand the broader impact of cyanokit administration in this context.

13 Thromboelastographic Coagulation Assessment in Burn Patients Receiving Plasma Inclusive Resuscitation

Abstract Introduction As resuscitative strategies in burn patients are re-evaluated, a consensus has not been reached on the role for colloids, as lactated ringers remain the fluid of choice with variable use of colloids. Colloids, such as fresh frozen plasma (FFP), may be effective at maintaining oncotic pressure, resupplying coagulation factors, mitigating coagulopathy, and treating the endothelium. This work aims to characterize the coagulation profile of burn patients treated with plasma inclusive resuscitation (PIR) using rapid thromboelastography (rTEG) by comparing it to burn patients primarily resuscitated with crystalloids alone. Methods Patients admitted to a regional burn center who had greater than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns that received PIR were included in the study. Patients admitted with burn injuries and resuscitated primarily with lactated ringers were included in the comparison group. Demographic data and blood samples were collected at 4 time points: baseline, before FFP, immediately following the initial unit of FFP, and following the completion of consecutive units of FFP. Samples collected from patients that received LR only were approximated to the FFP group time points. Coagulation parameters were measured using rTEG in blood samples. Descriptive analysis was used to compare demographic and burn injury characteristics at admission. A mixed effects model was used to compare the two groups through the observation period overall and at each time point. Results There were 35 patients in the FFP group and 15 patients in the comparison group. The groups were primarily male (74.3% vs 73.3%), and there was no difference in demographics, TBSA (34.0% (27.0-48.5) vs 33.0% (26.5-46.5, p=0.82)), Baux score, inhalation injury, and mortality rate (28.6% vs 26.7%, p=0.99). Major coagulation markers of rTEG (k, α-angle, MA, and ly30) were not different between these groups and were within normal ranges. The R time in the crystalloid group was greater than the normal range at all 4 time points. There were significant differences in R time at pre-FFP (30.0(25.0-32.5) secs vs 48.0 (36.0-54.0) secs, p&amp;lt; 0.001) and after all units (27.5(20.9-33.8) secs vs 48.0(48.0-54.0) secs, p&amp;lt; 0.0001) when compared to the FFP group where R time was in the normal range. Conclusions Plasma inclusive burn resuscitation did not result in hypercoagulability or changes in lysis when compared to patients primarily resuscitated with crystalloids. The elevated R time in the crystalloid group, which was not seen in the FFP group, may be due to the lack of replenishment in coagulation factors that FFP would provide. Further understanding of PIR’s role in the inflammatory response is needed to evaluate its impact during resuscitation. Applicability of Research to Practice Plasma inclusive resuscitation may be another tool to treat the multifactorial nature of burn shock and burn induced coagulopathy.

Validation of New Burns Score {Sion Prognostic Burns Scoring System (SPBSS)} and its Comparison with Jabalpur Prognostic Score, Baux Score &amp; Apache III Score

Validation of New Burns Score {Sion Prognostic Burns Scoring System (SPBSS)} and its Comparison with Jabalpur Prognostic Score, Baux Score &amp; Apache III Score

Effect of glycemic variability on infectious outcomes in critically Ill burn patients

After acute burn injury, patients experience a hypermetabolic state often complicated by a stress-induced hyperglycemia. Recent research points towards glycemic variability as a contributing factor in adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. In burn patients, greater glycemic variability has been associated with increased rates of mortality and sepsis. However, no studies to date have examined the impact of glycemic variability on rates of infection in this population or determined which measure may be most useful. Infection, and subsequent sepsis, remains the leading contributor to morbidity and mortality after burn injury. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between different measures of glycemic variability and infectious complications in burn patients. This retrospective study included patients admitted to a single American Burn Association-verified burn center between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 with burn or inhalation injury. The primary outcome was a composite of autograft loss, mortality, and proven infection. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and a further analysis of the proven infection component of the composite primary outcome. In addition to mean glucose, several different measures of glycemic variability were used for comparison, including standard deviation, coefficient of variation, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and J-index. Outcomes were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis while controlling for revised Baux score. A quantile analysis was performed to do determine the optimal mean threshold. Three hundred and ninety-two patients were admitted and screened for inclusion during the study period. Most patients were excluded due to a LOS less than 72 h. 112 patients were included in the study. Of the 112 patients, 22.3% experienced an infectious complication (25 patients with 28 complications). Mean glucose (OR 1.024; 95% CI 1.004–1.045) and J-index (OR 1.044; 95% CI 1.003–1.087) were associated with occurrence of infectious complications. Regarding target mean glucose threshold, a daily mean glucose above 150 mg/dL showed the strongest association with infectious complications (OR 3.634; 95% CI 1.008–13.101). Mean glucose, standard of deviation, and J-index were all independently associated with proven infection.

Burn or trauma scoring: experience of the burn unit of the Queen Astrid Military Hospital during the terror attacks on 22 March 2016.

On 22 March 2016, the burn unit (BU) of Queen Astrid Military Hospital assessed a surge in severely injured victims from terror attacks at the national airport and Maalbeek subway station according to the damage control resuscitation (DCR) and damage control surgery (DCS) principles. This study delves into its approach to identify a suitable triage scoring system and to determine if a BU can serve as buffer capacity for mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The study reviewed retrospectively the origin of explosion, demographic data, sustained injuries, performed surgery, and length of stay of all admitted patients. Trauma scores (Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS)) and triage scores (Revised Trauma Score (RTS), New Trauma Score (NTS), and Trauma Score Injury Severity Score (TRISS)), were compared to burn mortality scores (Osler updated Baux Score and Tobiasen's Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI)). Of the 23 casualties admitted to the BU, the scores calculated on average 3.5 indications for a level 1 trauma center (ISS 4, NISS 6, RTS 0, T-NTS 4). Nevertheless, no deaths occurred during admission or the 1-year follow-up. MCIs create chaos and a high demand for care. Avoiding bottlenecks and adhering to the DCR/DCS principles are necessary to deliver the best care to the largest number of people. This study indicates that a BU can serve as buffer capacity for MCIs. Nevertheless, its integration into the medical resilience plan depends on accurate scoring, comprehensive care availability, and understanding of the DCR/DCS concept. NTS for triage seems the best fit for scoring polytrauma referrals to a BU during MCIs.

A comparative study of the predictive value of four models for death in patients with severe burns

ObjectiveTo assess the prognostic value of the Ryan score, Belgian Outcome of Burn Injury (BOBI) score,revised Baux (rBaux) score, and a new model (a Logit(P)-based scoring method created in 2020) for predicting mortality risk in patients with extremely severe burns and to conduct a comparative analysis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 599 burn patients who met the inclusion criteria and were admitted to the burn unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from 2017 to 2022. Relevant information was collected, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted for each of the four models in assessing mortality in these burn patients using both age-stratified and unstratified forms. The ROC curve section was further compared with the area under the curve (AUC), optimal cutoff value, as well as its sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, the quality of the AUC was assessed using the Delong test. ResultAmong the patients who met the inclusion criteria, 532 were in the survival group and 67 in the death group. Irrespective of age stratification, the novel model exhibited superior performance with an AUC of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.838–0.894) among all four models predicting mortality risk in included patients, and also demonstrated better AUC quality than other models; the calibration curves showed that the accuracy of all four models was good; the DCA curves showed that the clinical utility of the novel model and rBuax score were better. In the comparison of four scoring models across different age groups, the new model demonstrated the largest AUC in both 0–19 years (0.954, 95% CI 0.914–0.979) and 20–59 years groups (0.838, 95% CI 0.793–0.877), while rBuax score exhibited the highest AUC in ≥ 60 years group (0.708, 95% CI of 0.602–0.800). The calibration curves showed that the four models exhibited greater accuracy within the age range of 20–59 years, while the DCA curves indicated that both the novel model and rBuax score scale displayed better prediction in both the 20–59 and ≥ 60 years groups. ConclusionsAll four models demonstrate accurate and effective prognostication for patients with severe burns. Both the novel model and rBaux score exhibit enhanced prediction utility. In terms of the model itself alone, the new model is not simpler than, for example, the rBaux score, and whether it can be applied clinicallyinvolves further study.

Cohort analysis of 50% lethal area (LA50) and associating factors in burn patients based on quality improvements and health policies

Burn injuries are among the common traumatic injuries, which can be accompanied with lifelong morbidity and mortality. The Lethal Area Fifty Percent (LA50) index is another reliable outcome measurement tool that assesses the standard of medical care at burn centers. It is widely used as a benchmark for assessing the quality of burn care and is considered the percentage at which 50% of burn patients are expected to die because of burn-related injuries. We aimed to determine and compare the LA50 in burn patients admitted to Shiraz Burn Referral Centers in 2018–2021 and 2011–2018 with regard to improving the quality of special care and infection control in the new hospital. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on patients admitted to Amir al-Momenin Burn Injury Hospital in Shiraz, Fars, Southern Iran. Data were retrospectively gathered from March 2011 to January 2022, and subsequently analyzed with standard statistical analysis, and also multivariate and probability analysis. A total of 7382 patients with acute burns injuries were identified. Among them, 4852 (65.7%) patients were men, and the median age was 27 years [Q1–Q3 7–40; range 1–98]. Most of the patients were in the pediatric and early adulthood age range, with 76.2% being younger than 40 years old. The median TBSA was 24% [IQR 14, 43], and the median duration of hospitalization was 11 [IQR 11] days. Most injuries were secondary to flame and fire (33.5%; n = 2472). The mortality rate in our study was 19.0% (n = 1403). We evaluated our patients based on two main time intervals: March 2011 till February 2018 (n = 3409; 46.2%), and March 2018 to January 2022 (n = 3973; 53.8%). Based on multivariate analysis, the second interval of our study was significantly correlated with a more female patients, higher age, lower TBSA, less burn injuries due to scald, contact, but more frequent fire and flame injuries, and also lower mortality rate. Factors correlated with higher mortality included male gender, older age, shorter hospitalization duration, higher TBSA, etiology of fire and flame, and accidental burn injuries. A Baux score of 76.5 had a sensitivity of 81.1%, specificity of 87.3%, accuracy of 86.1% in predicting mortality among our patients. The mortality probability for the study intervals were 20.67% (SD 33.0%) for 2011–2018, and 17.02% (SD 29.9%) for 2018–2022 (P < 0.001). The LA50 was 52.15 ± 2 for all patients. This ammount was 50 ± 2% in 2011–2018, and 54 ± 2 in 2018–2022 (P < 0.001). The mean LA50 values showed significant improvements following significant modifications in our critical care for burn victims, including augmented intensive care unit capacity, prompt relocation of inhalation burn cases to the intensive care unit, establishing a well-trained multidisciplinary team, and improved infection control. To improve outcomes for burn patients in developing countries, major changes should be made in the management of burn patients and LA50 is a reliable assessment tool for evaluating the how these changes affect patient’s outcomes.

Outcomes of burns patients in a developing country: A single centre's experience.

Pelonomi Tertiary Hospital is the only hospital in the Free State Province with a burns unit. We do not have official data to assess our performance in the management of burns. To determine the Lethal Area 50 (LA50) index for the Pelonomi Tertiary Hospital's burns unit. Furthermore, to determine the morbidity that affects burns patients at the institution, and the factors associated with outcomes. We used Redcap to capture demographic and clinical data of burn patients admitted to our institution between January 2014 and December 2018. Logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of the outcomes. The LA50 was calculated by performing a probit regression of survival by total body surface area (TBSA). We used SAS 9.4 statistics software package. Our study had a male preponderance, with 59.7% (601) male, 39.9% (401) female and 0.4% (4) missing sex. We had a mean age of 19.4 years, of which 53.38% (n=537) were paediatric patients and 46.32% (n=469) adults. The mean length of hospital stay was 16.88 days. Our LA50 was 37%, and the overall mortality was 14.63%, with a mean age of 33.96, a mean TBSA of 43.3% and a mean revised Baux score of 80.55 for the mortality group. The paediatric group had a 5.03% (n=27) mortality rate, with 88.88% of these being children under 5 years with an LA50 of 45%, and the adult group had a 25.56% (n=120) mortality rate with an LA50 of 34%. Factors associated with mortality were age (p<0.0001), TBSA (p<0.0001), female sex (p=0.4126), full-thickness burns (p=0.7160) and burns to the head (p=0.9038). The leading cause of injury was hot water (46.5% of patients), followed by fire at 38.6%. HIV was the leading comorbidity, affecting 6.9% (n=67) of patients, followed by hypertension at 4.67% (n=47), and 2.58% (n=26) of patients had epilepsy. The leading complication was sepsis, affecting 14.67% (n=144) of patients. The average waiting time between admission and skin graft was 25.29 days, and for debridement was 3.57 days. The epidemiology of burn patients and working conditions at Pelonomi Tertiary Hospital are similar to other burn units in the country; however, our mortality rate is higher than at most centres. The LA50 is low, but in keeping with the rest of Africa, and our predictors of mortality are in keeping with those found in other studies in other parts of the world.

The use of NexoBrid™ enzymatic debridement and coagulation abnormalities

ObjectivesCurrent evidence on how the use of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement techniques (NexoBrid™) affect patient coagulation is limited. A single patient case report [1] suggests that a patient with 15% total body surface area (TBSA) burn developed decreased coagulation activity following debridement with NexoBrid™ enzymatic debridement (ED). Regional Burns Centres in the United Kingdom may be reluctant to use ED, particularly in larger burns, citing concerns regarding coagulation. At our centre we have routinely used ED on deep partial thickness burns since 2017 including on patients with burns over 15% TBSA. This study aims to investigate whether there is a significant disruption in coagulation in patients undergoing ED with burns > 15% TBSA or admitted to intensive care compared to the standard of care (SOC) which is surgical debridement in theatre. MethodsThis single-centre retrospective study includes all patients with a burn treated with ED at Pinderfields General Hospital Regional Burns Centre intensive care unit (ITU) from 2017 to 2020. Patients were matched to those treated with SOC at the same centre by age, % TBSA burn and presence of inhalational injury. These parameters correlate with the Baux score [9]. Percentage of burn debrided was matched as closely as possible, with coagulation profiles and platelet count taken the day before, the day of and three days following surgery. ResultsThirty-one patients were treated with ED in the intensive care unit between 2017 and 2020. Four patients were excluded due to insufficient records and one patient was anti-coagulated. Twenty-six patients were included and matched as described above. Average age of patients receiving ED was 44 years, the same in the matched group. Average TBSA burn is 35.5% (35.8% in matched group). No statistically significant difference in coagulation was seen between patients undergoing ED compared to SOC when considering prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and platelet count. Both groups slightly breached the upper limit of normal on day 2 post ED and SOC. There was a slight breach of the lower limit of the average platelet count on day 2 post-ED which was neither statistically nor clinically significant. ConclusionsLarge burns are associated with coagulation abnormalities, therefore isolating a single variable in this cohort is challenging. However, this study found no significant change following ED use when compared to SOC and therefore no convincing evidence that ED is associated with coagulation abnormalities. This study represents one of the largest focusing on coagulation abnormalities following the use of ED, as the current literature is limited. Our study suggests that concerns regarding coagulation abnormalities should not prevent patients with large, deep partial thickness burns or full thickness burns being treated with ED.

Role of Revised Baux Score in Burns

Burns is one of the risk factors contributing to the mortality and morbidity burden of developing countries. Even though advancements in burn patient management have significantly decreased the mortality. Predicting the outcome of severe burns patient at presentation plays a paramount role in guiding clinical judgment. Multiple scoring systems are available to predict mortality in burns patients in developed countries. In this article, the Revised Baux score has been applied in predicting mortality in burns patients.

The Revised Baux Score as a Predictor of Burn Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mortality following a severe burn is influenced by both patient- and injury-factors, and a number of predictive models have been developed or applied. As there is no consensus on the optimal formula to use, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of the revised Baux score in comparison to other models when determining mortality risk in patients with burn injuries. A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA statement. The review yielded 21 relevant studies. The PROBAST quality appraisal checklist was used with many studies classified as "high" quality. All studies assessed the utility of the revised Baux score in comparison to other scoring systems such as the original Baux, BOBI, ABSI, APACHE II, SOFA, Boston Group/Ryan scores, the FLAMES model, the Prognostic Burn Index. There was a range of 48 to 15975 participants per study, with a mean age range of 16 to 52 years old. The AUC values of the rBaux score ranged from 0.682 to 0.99, with a summary AUC of 0.93 for all included studies (CI 0.91-0.95). This summary value demonstrates that the rBaux equation is a reliable predictor for mortality risk in heterogeneous populations. However, this study also identified that the rBaux equation has a diminished ability to predict mortality risk when applied to patients at both extremes of age, highlighting an important area for future research. Overall, the rBaux equation offers a relatively easy means to quickly assess the mortality risk from burn injury in a broad range of patient populations.

503 The Accuracy of the Revised Baux Score in Predicting Burn Mortality: A Systematic Review

Abstract Introduction Osler et al. revised the Baux score in 2010 to include inhalation injury, attempting to improve upon the original 1961 model given the significant advances in modern burn care. Other predictive models of burn mortality have similarly been developed using use an assortment of other variables, however there is no consensus on the preferred formula to use. This systematic review aims to investigate the accuracy of the revised Baux (rBaux) score in comparison to other models when determining mortality risk in patients with burn injuries. Methods A systematic review was performed by two independent reviewers using electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus) from March 1, 2010 to May 22, 2022. The majority of studies were classified as “high” quality and no studies were excluded due to risk of bias. Articles were included if they were published in English and assessed risk of mortality from burns using the rBaux model and an alternative model. The PRISMA statement was followed, and all the PROBAST quality appraisal checklist was used during data extraction. Results The search identified 79 non-duplicate citations, of which 33 underwent full-text review, and 21 met inclusion criteria. They assessed the predictive ability of the rBaux score in comparison to the original Baux score, Belgian Outcome for Burn Injury, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index, APACHE II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Boston Group/Ryan scores, the FLAMES model, the Prognostic Burn Index, and several other equations that have not been externally validated. The accuracy of mortality prediction (area under ROC curves) for the rBaux score ranged from 0.68 to 0.99 and 14 studies found a value greater than 0.90. These ROC values were found to be lowest in the two studies with subgroupings for age, demonstrating an ROC of 0.01 in children, and 0.68 and 0.92 in the elderly. Eleven studies described sensitivity, specificity, or both, with sensitivity ranging from 12% to 96%, and specificity ranging from 80% to 100%. Conclusions The rBaux score offers a relatively easy method to rapidly assess the mortality risk from burn injury in a broad range of patient populations based on age, percent total body surface area burned, and presence/absence of an inhalation injury. This tool remains valid despite the exclusion of patient comorbidities and other injury-related factors. However, this study also identified the rBaux’s ability to predict mortality risk was limited when applied to patients at the extremes of age, highlighting an important area for future research. At present, given its relative simplicity and generalizability, the rBaux score remains a useful clinical tool for predicting mortality. Applicability of Research to Practice The rBaux score remains a simple yet powerful predictor of mortality in burn patients, which can be applied at the bedside on initial presentation across diverse patient populations.

779 Utilization of Palliative Care in Patients Succumbing to Primary Burn Injury

Abstract Introduction Burn injury is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Access to palliative care (PC) is variable, and many patients who die after burns do not receive specialized PC consultation. We conducted a retrospective nation-wide study of patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of burn injury who died prior to hospital discharge to identify factors associated with receiving palliative care. Methods Data from the HCUP National Inpatient Sample (2016-2019) were queried to identify inpatient deaths among adults ≥18 admitted with a primary ICD-10 burn diagnosis. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed between patients who did and did not receive PC using chi-square tests and multivariable Poisson regression on data weighted to represent the national population. Baux scores were calculated by adding age and percentage of body burnt based upon ICD-10 code categorizations; a revised Baux score was calculated for inhalation injury. Results Of 98,845 patients admitted to inpatient care from 2016 to 2019 with a primary burn diagnosis, 3250 (3.3%) died prior to discharge. 1390 (42.8%) of patients who died had a PC encounter. Patients who did not receive PC were younger (mean 58.7 vs. 63.9, p=0.0002), had lower Baux scores (mean 104.6 vs. 112.4, p=0.002) and a longer length of stay (LOS) (mean 19.3 vs. 13.3, p=0.008). Controlling for age, sex, Baux score and LOS, White patients had a 35% greater likelihood of receiving PC than Black patients (incidence rate ratio, IRR 1.35, 0.95 CI (1.02,1.79)). All else held constant, patients aged 70-79 had the greatest likelihood (68%, IRR 1.68, 0.95 CI (1.31,2.15)) of receiving PC versus patients &amp;lt; 60 years old. Urban teaching hospitals had the highest percentage of burn patients (92.7% vs. 5.2% non-teaching vs. 2.1% rural) and the highest rate of providing PC (43% vs. 30% non-teaching vs. 20% rural, p=0.446) to patients that died. Insurance type (Medicare, Medicaid, Private, and other) did not correlate with receiving PC (p=0.054). The number of diagnoses, procedures and gender did not differ between deceased patients who did and did not receive PC. Conclusions More than half of burn patients who died prior to discharge did not receive a palliative care consultation. Unsurprisingly, older patients were more likely to receive PC. Patients who did not receive PC were more likely to have been younger, Black, have had lower Baux scores or to have been treated in non-urban non-teaching hospitals. The high Baux score of the younger patients (104.6) is associated with significant risk of death; this population might benefit from PC consultation. The discrepancy between White and Black patients in the delivery of PC services is striking. Further study is necessary to identify not only those burn patients most likely to benefit from PC but also the barriers to receiving palliative care in burn injury. Applicability of Research to Practice Demonstrates the inconsistency of palliative care use in the burn population