Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures Research Articles

Basicervical femoral neck fractures: an observational study derived from the Swedish Fracture Register.

Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). 1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip-apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality. The mean age was 82 years (range 60-101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF. Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.

Comparison of the Surgical Outcome between the Multiple Screw Fixation and Fixed Angle Devices for the Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures.

Introduction: Basicervical femoral neck fracture (FNF) is an uncommon type of femoral neck fracture and is associated with an increased risk of fixation failure due to its inherent instability. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical parameters and reoperation rate between the use of a multiple cannulated screw (MCS) and fixed angle device (FAD) in treating basicervical FNFs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 885 patients who underwent internal fixation between May 2004 and August 2019 to determine basicervical FNF with at least 12 months of follow-up. Among the identified 77 patients with basicervical FNF, 17 patients who underwent multiple cannulated screw (MCS) fixation and 36 patients who underwent fixed angle device (FAD) fixation were included. We compared the rates of fracture-site collapse and reoperations according to the fixation device. Results: Among the 53 patients with basicervical FNF, 13 patients (24.5%) sustained surgical complications (8 collapses of fracture site and 5 reoperations). The reoperation rate in the MCS group was significantly higher than that in the FAD group (23.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.016), without any significant difference in the collapse of the fracture site (11.8% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.642). Conclusions: Although basicervical FNF was rare among hip fractures, fracture site collapse was prevalent and prone to fixation failure. Surgeons should keep this in mind, and consider FAD for basicervical FNF.

Provisional Reduction to Avoid the Wedge Effect and Control Rotational Deforming Force During Cephalomedullary Nail Insertion for Unstable Intertrochanteric and Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures: A Novel Surgical Technique

Provisional Reduction to Avoid the Wedge Effect and Control Rotational Deforming Force During Cephalomedullary Nail Insertion for Unstable Intertrochanteric and Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures: A Novel Surgical Technique

Finite element analysis of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with proximal femoral bionic nail

BackgroundDynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) were recommended for basicervical femoral neck fracture (BFNF), however, with high rate of postoperative femoral neck shortening. The proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN) was designed to decrease the postoperative complications associated with DHS and PFNA. The aim of this study is to compare the biomechanical characters of DHS, PFNA, and PFBN for fixation of BFNF.MethodsUsing finite element analysis, we created a three-dimensional model of the BFNF for this investigation. The PFBN group, the PFNA group and the DHS + DS group were our three test groups. For each fracture group, the von Mises stress and displacements of the femur and internal fixation components were measured under 2100 N axial loads.ResultsThe PFBN group demonstrated the lowest stress on the implants, significantly lower than the PFNA and DHS + DS groups. In terms of stress on the implants, the PFBN group exhibited the best performance, with the lowest stress concentration at 112.0 MPa, followed by the PFNA group at 124.8 MPa and the DHS + DS group at 149.8 MPa. The PFBA group demonstrated the smallest displacement at the fracture interface, measuring 0.21 mm, coupled with a fracture interface pressure of 17.41 MPa, signifying excellent stability.ConclusionsCompared with DHS and PFNA, PFBN has advantages in stress distribution and biological stability. We believe the concept of triangle fixation will be helpful to reduce femoral neck shortening associated with DHS and PFNA and thus improve the prognosis of BFNF.

Validation of direct CT measurement of malrotation in femoral neck fractures: A bone model study.

While postoperative malrotation in the subtrochanteric region is a well-known problem, malrotation after osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures has not been extensively studied. In this context, many methods for perioperatively assessment of femoral torsion have been described, but none of them is applicable in the basicervical region of the proximal femur. As an important difference in femoral neck fractures, the discontinuous neck fails to serve as a significant "pointer" for measurements and malfunctions to be placed in relation to the condylar plane. Considering postoperative maltorsion at any location as a substantial negative effect on patients' outcome and functional expectations, precise and patient-friendly rotation measurement standards in femoral neck fractures are desired in clinical practice. Recently, a novel computed tomography (CT) based geometric technique was described named "direct measurement" with promising results covering this diagnostic disparity, but still requires validation. Thus, we aimed to validate the previously described technique using a controlled range of displacement in a femoral neck fracture Sawbone® model. A goniometer was designed to set retro- and anteversion of the proximal femur in a reproducible manner. Prospectively, all femurs underwent a CT scan and were measured 3D for displacement. The interclass correlation between the CT measurements and the goniometer measurements was calculated and was found to be very high (1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00; p < 0.001). For the mean of all measurements, the Pearson's correlation was 1.00 (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the measurements of both investigators were observed, with 20° of retroversion not significant (-1.20 ± 1.71; 95% confidence interval: -2.43-0.03; p = 0.054). This CT-based 3D measurement technique may allow for perioperative malrotation assessment in basicervical femoral neck fractures and appears to be feasible in femoral neck fractures when it comes to rare cases of osteosynthesis. Further investigations are still needed to define the thresholds of malrotation provoking functional impairment after osteosynthesis in basicervical femoral neck fractures.

AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline.

AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline.

Primary Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures.

PurposeBasicervical femoral neck fractures are uncommon injuries that occur at the extracapsular base of the femoral neck at its transition with the intertrochanteric line. Controversy remains in the orthopedic literature as to the optimal method of treatment for this fracture type given the inherent instability and greater rate of implant failure with traditional fixation constructs. The purpose of this study is to quantify the incidence and preferred treatment methods of basicervical hip fractures at a single, regional, Level 1 trauma center and to identify differences in postoperative complications between treatment options.MethodsThe present study is a retrospective case series from a single regional health network, including 316 patients with hip fractures. Basicervical femoral neck fractures were identified. Reoperation rates within 90 days, implant failures or nonunions, postoperative ambulation distances and range of motion, and discharge dispositions were compared across patients grouped by surgical treatment with either cephalomedullary nail, sliding hip screw, or hemiarthroplasty (HA).ResultsBasicervical femoral neck fractures represented 6.6% of this study population. The cephalomedullary nail group demonstrated rates of implant failure and return to the operating room within 90 days of 40% (4/10) and 20% (2/10), respectively. No patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty experienced a failure of fixation or return to the operating room.ConclusionsThis study suggests a much lower rate of fixation failure or need for reoperation with hemiarthroplasty treatment compared to cephalomedullary nail construct for basicervical femoral neck fractures and may be an underutilized treatment method for this fracture type. The promising results seen with this case series should encourage further investigation into HA as a primary treatment for these uncommon, yet challenging, fractures.

Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures

The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation stability of proximal fragments and the mechanical characteristics in proximal femur models of basicervical femoral neck fracture fixed by the femoral neck system (FNS) versus the dynamic hip screw. The mean axial stiffness was 234 ± 35 N/mm in the FNS group and 253 ± 42 N/mm in the DHS group, showing no significant difference (p = 0.654). Mean values for x-axis rotation, y-axis rotation, and z-axis rotation after cycle load were 2.2 ± 0.5°, 6.5 ± 1.5°, and 2.5 ± 0.6°, respectively, in the FNS group and 2.5 ± 0.7°, 5.8 ± 2.1°, and 2.2 ± 0.9°, respectively, in the DHS group, showing no significant differences (p = 0.324, p = 0.245, and p = 0.312, respectively). The mean values of cranial and axial migration of screws within the femoral head were 1.5 ± 0.3 and 2.1 ± 0.2 mm, respectively, in the FNS group and 1.2 ± 0.3 and 2.4 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, in the DHS group, showing no significant differences (p = 0.425 and p = 0.625, respectively). The average failure load at vertical load was 1342 ± 201 N in the FNS group and 1450 ± 196 N in the DHS group, showing no significant difference (p = 0.452). FNS fixation might provide biomechanical stability comparable to that of DHS for treating displaced basicervical femoral neck fractures in young adults.

Provisional fixation of unstable femoral neck basicervical fractures: A web-based survey and biomechanical assessment using a sliding hip screw construct

Objectives:Many hip fractures are considered rotationally unstable, especially during lag screw insertion. To counteract this instability, multiple provisional fixation constructs have been used to maintain the fracture reduction. This study aimed to compare the methods of provisional fixation biomechanically in ba sicervical femoral neck fractures.Methods:A web-based survey was sent by e-mail to members of three orthopedic assocations with questions concerning used techniques for provisional fixation of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures and these results were used to guide our biomechanical assessment. Twenty, fourth-generation composite proximal femurs were osteotomized in the basicervical region to simulate a basicervical fracture. These fractures were anatomically reduced and one of the four provisional fixation constructs was applied. A sliding hip screw was then inserted with a torque limiter to the appropriate depth. The amount of fracture displacement during screw insertion was collected and analyzed.Results:Of the 142 respondents, 79.6% apply some form of provisional fixation. Derotational screw was the most commonly used provisional fixation (43.4%), followed by one superior Kirschner wire (K-wire) (39.8%). Biomechanically, the single derotation screw construct showed significantly less displacement (0.92 mm) than the one superior K-wire construct (3.09 mm). No other significant differences in fracture displacement were found between the groups.Conclusion:This study highlights that the majority of surgeons apply a form of provisional fixation during the surgical management of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures. We have shown biomechanically that the single derotation screw had superior rotational stability when compared to the one superior K-wire.

Cephalomedullary Nailing versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PurposeAlthough many studies have reported the use of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) for basicervical femoral neck fracture (BFNF), no clear treatment protocols have been recommended. The present study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes associated with DHS and CMN to determine the appropriate fixation method for BFNF.Materials and MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 9, 2021 that compared the treatment outcomes between CMN and DHS in BFNF. The primary outcomes of the present meta-analysis were fracture union time, postoperative cut-out rate, and reoperation rate.ResultsWe included seven studies involving 353 cases of BFNF in our review. Of these, 206 patients were treated using CMN, and DHS were utilized in 147 patients. In a pooled analysis, the DHS group required a longer time to achieve fracture union compared to the CMN group [mean difference (MD): -0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.70, -0.12; p=0.006; I2=0%]. However, the cut-out and reoperation rates exhibited no statistically significant differences between the DHS and CMN groups [cut-out odds ratio (OR): 0.54; 95% CI: 0.10, 2.82; p=0.47; I2=24%, reoperation rate OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.15, 2.86; p=0.57; I2=19%, respectively].ConclusionStable fixation using DHS and CMN does not show a significant clinical or radiographical difference in BFNF, and the implant can be selected based on the surgeon’s preference.

A Retrospective Study on the Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail

Introduction: Basicervical fractures are one of the rarest peritrochanteric fractures. They have an inherent instability which make makes them notoriously prone for treatment failure. Because they cannot be classified as neither strictly intertrochanteric, nor intracapsular fractures, their treatment protocol is also not standardized. Newer implants are regularly tested in their management, with varying degrees of success. Aim: To assess the functional and radiological outcome of basicervical neck of femur fracture with the use of the proximal femoral nail. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in Department of Orthopaedics at Malabar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kozhikode, Kerala, India, from September 2021 to December 2021. It was performed on 31 patients who were identified from a patient pool of 1526 individual with neck of femur fracture, as having basicervical fracture, but one patient follow-up details were not available hence total sample size was 30. The patients were followed-up for a year and the functional outcome was assessed using modified Harris Hip Score and classified as poor, fair, good, or excellent. Radiological outcome was assessed based on reduction. Reduction was classified as anatomical (deviation &lt;5°), acceptable (deviation 5-10°) or bad (deviation &gt;10°) as per the classification suggested by Hardy et al.,. Descriptive statistical measures, namely mean, frequency and standard deviation were calculated. Results: With the Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN), anatomical reduction was attained in 22 subjects (73.3%), acceptable in six subjects (20%) and bad in two subjects (6.7%). There were no instances of deep vein thrombosis, non union or avascular necrosis head of femur. The average time to radiological union was 13.5±1.8 weeks. Using modified Harris Hip Score, functional outcome was poor in two patients (6.7%) , good in two patients (6.7%) and excellent in 26 patients (86.6%). Conclusion: The PFN, even though phased out in first world countries, is a safe and viable implant choice for the management of Basicervical femoral neck fractures, with good functional and radiological outcome.

Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and mortality of adult femoral neck and basicervical fractures: an observational study of 40,049 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register

BackgroundAlthough femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are common in orthopedic departments, optimal treatment methods remain in dispute. There are few large nationwide studies, including basicervical FNFs (bFNFs), on epidemiology, treatment, and mortality. This nationwide study aims to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification, current treatment regimens, and mortality of undisplaced and minimally displaced (Garden I–II, uFNF), displaced (Garden III–IV, dFNF) and bFNFs in adults.MethodsAll FNFs, including bFNFs with a registered injury date between 1 April 2012 and 31 December 2020, were included in this observational study from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Data on age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture classification, primary treatment, and seasonal variation were analyzed.ResultsSome 40,049 FNFs were registered in the SFR. The mean age of the patients in the register was 80.3 (SD 11) years and 63.8% (25,567) were female. Of all FNFs, 25.0% (10,033) were uFNFs, 63.4% (25,383) dFNFs, and 11.6% (4,633) bFNFs. Non-surgical treatment was performed in 0.6% (261) of the patients. Internal fixation (IF) (84.7%) was the main treatment for uFNFs and arthroplasty (87.3%) for dFNFs. For bFNFs, IF (43.8%) and hip arthroplasty (45.9%) were performed equally often. Of the 33,105 patients with a 1-year follow-up mortality at 1-year was 20.6% for uFNF, 24.3% for dFNF, and 25.4% for bFNF.ConclusionThe main treatment of uFNFs is IF with screws or pins. Hip arthroplasty is the predominant treatment for dFNF. bFNF are more common than previously reported and treated with IF or arthroplasty, depending on patient age. These results may help health care providers, researchers and clinicians better understand the panorama of FNFs in Sweden.Level of EvidenceIV, retrospective cohort study.

A comparative study of functional outcome of proximal femoral nailing and bipolar hemiarthroplasty in unstable basicervical fracture neck of femur in age >45 years

Background: A basicervical femoral neck fracture, which is located at the junction between the femoral neck and intertrochanteric region, is a rare type of fracture. (1) Despite several randomized trials and comparative studies treatment of unstable basicervical fractures in elderly patients is still controversial, which we want to investigate. Methods: A prospective cohort analysis of 44 patients, of which 22 each were operated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BPA) and proximal femur nail (PFN) between January 2018 till July 2021 was done. Primary outcome was assessed in both groups using Harris hip score( HHS) at 4weeks, 6 weeks, 12weeks, 6months and 1 year on outpatient basis. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, functional outcome, range of motion limb length discrepancy at final follow up. All complications were noted at follow up.Results: The HHS was significantly higher for BPA group at all follow ups, at 4 weeks of follow up was 79.81 for BPA and 73.18 for PFN (p-value = 0.001) and at 1 year of follow up was 88.55 for BPA and 79.03 for PFN (p-value = 0.001). Statistically significant differences were found between BPA and PFN groups with reference to intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, functional outcome, range of motion, limb length discrepancy at final follow up.Conclusion: The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group had fewer complications and earlier mobilization with better Harris hip score at all follow ups, which indicate bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a better option in the treatment of unstable basicervical fractures in elderly patients.

Outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP)

IntroductionBasicervical femoral neck fracture is associated with high rates of failure due instability patterns, mainly collapse and rotational instability.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical-radiological results of a group of patients with a bascervical proximal femoral fractures treated with Percutaneous Compression Plate (PCCP). Material and methodsAmong 5817 patients with a hip fracture who were admitted in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2017, 234 factures (4%) were diagnosed of basicervical femoral fracture. 30 of them were treated with a PCCP, 22 women and 8 men, mean age was 81.2 years (63-94). Demographic and perioperative variables were collected. The patients were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months clinically and radiologically. ResultsThere were no intra-operative complications and no conversions to open surgery. There was no early implant failure. No surgical wound infection was diagnosed. Crude mortality was 13% the first year and 87% were able to walk at the 6 months. The last follow-up x-rays revealed 97% fracture healing and the collapse at fracture site occurred in 4 hips.No instances of cut-out were observed. In one case, a fatigue failure of the lag screws of a PCCP plate was observed at 3 months from osteosynthesis. ConclusionPCCP is an appropriated implant for basicervical femoral neck fractures.

Intramedullary Nail Breakage and Mechanical Displacement in Patients with Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database Analysis

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the rates and patterns of intramedullary nail (IMN) breakage and mechanical displacement for proximal femur fractures and the factors associated with their occurrence.Patients and MethodsPatients with subtrochanteric, intertrochanteric, or basicervical femoral neck fractures treated with IMN from 2016 to 2019 were identified from commercial and Medicare supplemental claims databases and were followed for up to two years. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated the cumulative incidence of and patterns of breakage/mechanical displacement. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the factors associated with breakage/mechanical displacement.ResultsA total of 11,128 patients had IMN fixation for subtrochanteric, intertrochanteric, or basicervical femoral neck fractures: (mean SD) age 75.6 (16.4) years, 66.2% female, 74.3% Medicare supplemental vs 26.7% commercial insurance. Comorbidities included hypertension (62.9%), osteoporosis (27.3%), cardiac arrhythmia (23.1%), diabetes (30.7%), and chronic pulmonary disease (16.3%). Most fractures were closed (97.2%), intertrochanteric or basicervical femoral neck (80.1%), and not pathological (91.0%). The cumulative incidence of nail breakage over two years was 0.66% overall, 1.44% for combination fractures, 1.16% for subtrochanteric fractures, and 0.49% for intertrochanteric or basicervical fractures. The cumulative incidence of mechanical displacement was 0.37% overall, 0.43% for subtrochanteric fractures, 0.42% for combination fractures, and 0.36% for intertrochanteric or basicervical femoral neck fractures. Half of the breakages occurred within five months after surgery and half of the mechanical displacements occurred within 75 days. Age 50–64 (vs 75+) and subtrochanteric or pathological fracture were more commonly associated with nail breakage. Complicated hypertension was more commonly associated with mechanical displacement.ConclusionThe incidence of IMN breakage and mechanical displacement in US commercial and Medicare supplemental patients with proximal femur fractures from 2016 to 2019 was low (0.66% and 0.37%, respectively up to two years). Age 50–64 (vs 75+) and subtrochanteric or pathological fracture were more commonly associated with breakage. Complicated hypertension was associated with mechanical displacement.

Treatment and outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fractures: A systematic review.

This study aims to systematically review the literature comparing surgical treatments options and respective failure rates for basicervical hip fractures. A comprehensive search of databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for studies published in English on or before June 21, 2019 was performed. Selected search terms included "basicervical," "basi cervical," "AO/OTA type 31-B," "femoral neck fracture" AND "bone nails," "bone screws," "fracture fixation," "internal fixation," "arthroplasty," "cephalomedullary," "sliding hip screw," "ORIF," and "treatment outcome." We included studies that assessed outcomes of basicervical fracture fixation using open reduction internal fixation or arthroplasty. Two authors extracted the following data from each paper: study design, country, cohort year, definition of basicervical, intervention type, sample size, patient demographics, follow-up length, percent of fractures that required revision, and the percent of implants that failed. Sixteen articles encompassing 910 patients were included. The main outcome was the percent of implants that required revision. The total revision rates were 8% (8 studies, 157 patients, range 0%-55%) for cephalomedullary nails, 7% (10 studies, 584 patients, range 0%-18%) for sliding hip screws, 23% (3 studies, 40 patients, range 16%-50%) for cannulated screws, 0% (1 study, 6 patients) for total hip arthroplasty, and 8% (2 studies, 13 patients, range 0%-11%) for hemiarthroplasty. Management of basicervical fractures with SHS and CMN produces similar failure and re-operation rates. Limited evidence is available on the use of cannulated screws and arthroplasty, but available studies suggest that cannulated screws have an unacceptable revision rate (23%) while arthroplasty may be acceptable. Future studies examining the comparative efficacy of various fixation methods would benefit from strict definition of fracture type as well as consistent reporting of functional outcomes, re-operation rates, and mortality.

Comparison of the survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF for basi-cervical femoral neck fractures in the overall population and in polymorbid patients

BackgroundFemoral neck fractures (FNFs) are associated with high mortality and can be treated with arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). For basi-cervical FNFs, there is no agreement on which procedure is better. Do arthroplasty and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) have different rates of survival? Do age and comorbidities influence survivorship? HypothesisPatients who underwent arthroplasty and patients who underwent ORIF have different rates of survival. Patients and methodsSurvivorship curves, complications, and hospitalisation length were analysed in 154 patients who received hip arthroplasty, and in 72 patients who received ORIF. Age and ASA score were used to divide the patients into sub-groups and perform secondary analyses. ResultsAt 4.9±2.4 years after surgery, 74 patients in the arthroplasty group (48%) and 33 in the ORIF group (45%) had died. The survivorship curves of the two groups showed a non-significant difference. The hospitalisation length was 13.5±8.9 days, with a non-significant difference between groups. There were 130 complications in total: 97 in the arthroplasty patients (19 patients had multiple complications, 52 had only one), 33 in the ORIF patients (4 patients had multiple complications, 29 had only one); the odds ratio was therefore 2.1 (p=0.02). Age, ASA score, Sernbo score, Charlson comorbidity index, and sex (male) were the best predictors of mortality. In the ASA 3–4 sub-group, the survivorship curves showed a lower mortality in the arthroplasty group (p=0.02). DiscussionArthroplasty and ORIF are both valid procedures for the treatment of basi-cervical FNFs, but a high mortality rate is associated with either procedures. There is no difference in terms of survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF in the overall population, but the presence of comorbidities may favour arthroplasty, which should be considered when managing patients with basi-cervical FNFs. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective, observational study.

Review on Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Definition, Treatments, and Failures.

Basicervical femoral neck fracture is an uncommon fracture that accounts for only 1.8% of all proximal femoral fractures. Previous studies have recommended that the choice of implant to treat this fracture should be similar to that of intertrochanteric fracture. However, in previous studies on basicervical fractures, the definition and treatment results of these fractures were different, and there were also debates on the implant that had to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the studies that performed surgical treatment of basicervical femoral fractures and to assess the definition of basicervical fracture, the use of implants, and failure rates and clinical results. Study selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) treatment outcome for basicervical femoral neck fracture was reported; and (2) dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail, or multiple screw fixation was used as treatment. PubMed Central, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and AHRQ databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up to March, 2020 with English language restriction. A total of 15 studies were included in this study. Differences were found in the definition of basicervical fracture, treatment results, rehabilitation protocol, and fixation failure rate. Definitions and treatment methods for basicervical fractures varied, and treatment outcomes also differed among the enrolled studies. Further research is needed that would be restricted to those fractures that conform to the definition of basicervical fracture.

A Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures

Background: Surgical treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures, which are biomechanically similar to intertrochanteric fractures, is an internal fixation by dynamic hip screw (DHS) and anti-rotation screw. Since one of the remarkable complications of this surgical procedure is device failure, we aimed to make a comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and the DHS plate fixation in elderly patients with basicervical femoral neck fracture.&#x0D; Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial study, 60 patients with femoral neck fractures were randomly divided into two groups of DHS fixation (control group, n = 30) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (intervention group, n = 30). Harris Hip Score (HHS) questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment were used for functional evaluations. Postoperative complications were evaluated at 6 months and one year postoperatively.&#x0D; Results: The mean age was 73.95 ± 9.85 years in the hemiarthroplasty group and 74.22 ± 7.85 years in the internal fixation group. Three patients in the internal fixation group and 6 patients in the hemiarthroplasty group were excluded. HHS in 6 months and one year after surgery in the intervention group was dramatically higher than the control group. There were no noticeable changes in VAS scores between the two groups. Two cases of device failure happened in the control group.&#x0D; Conclusions: It seems that bipolar hemiarthroplasty is more effective than internal fixation by DHS plate in improving the patient’s quality of life, considering higher HHS scores, earlier patient mobilization, shorter hospital stay, lower device failure rate, and lower revision rate

English

English