Baseline Alpha-fetoprotein Research Articles

SCT-I10A combined with a bevacizumab biosimilar (SCT510) versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase 3 trial.

4092 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant health concern in China, and it has been a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Immunotherapy combined with anti-vascular growth therapy is the first recommended therapy. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SCT-I10A (an anti-programmed death 1 [PD-1] monoclonal antibody) combined with SCT510 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) compared to sorafenib as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial (NCT04560894) conducted in China, patients with advanced HCC who had not received prior system therapy were enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive SCT-I10A (200 mg every three weeks [Q3W]) plus SCT510 (a bevacizumab biosimilar, 15 mg/kg Q3W) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until no clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (<400ng/ml vs. ≥400ng/ml), macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs. no). The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the blinded independent central review (BICR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the full analysis set. Results: At the data cutoff for the interim analysis (November 2, 2023), a total of 346 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose (SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group, n=230; sorafenib group, n=116), and the median follow-up was 19.7 months. The SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group exhibited a significantly longer median OS than that in the sorafenib group (22.1 vs. 14.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44, 0.81; p=0.0008). Median PFS was prolonged significantly in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group compared to the sorafenib group (7.1 vs. 2.9 months; HR 0.50; 95%CI: 0.38, 0.65; p<0.0001). The objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group (32.8% [75/229]) than in the sorafenib group (4.3% [5/116]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 42.6% (98/230) of patients in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group and 33.6% (39/116) of patients in the sorafenib group. The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was hypertension (SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group vs. sorafenib group: 7.8% [18/230] vs. 4.3% [5/116]). Three drug-related deaths (unknown cause, hemorrhage intracranial, or upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 1 patient each) occurred and were related to SCT510. Conclusions: The combination of SCT-I10A and SCT510 showed substantial clinical advantages and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced HCC, thereby supporting its suitability as a first-line treatment option for HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04560894 .

Apatinib and camrelizumab plus Intravenous FOLFOX or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX for advanced HCC: A multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III trial.

TPS4193 Background: The combination of anti-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint blockade showed promising outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with apatinib and camrelizumab could augment treatment efficacy in preliminary study. But HAIC has disadvantages such as technical limitations, expensive cost, impaired liver function and poor patient comfort. Results from our previous phase II trial (NCT05412589) demonstrate that the triplet treatment of Venous Infusional FOLFOX plus camrelizumab and apatinib showed inspiring antitumor activity and acceptable safety for CNLC stage Ⅲ HCC, especially in those with main portal trunk invasion (Vp4). These results encourage us to further compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous FOLFOX with apatinib and camrelizumab versus HAIC-FOLFOX with apatinib and camrelizumab as first-line treatment in advanced HCC. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study (NCT06172205) will enroll 192 patients. Essential criteria for patient inclusion encompassed: age between 18 and 75 years; a clinical diagnosis conforms to primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); classification with in BCLC stage C; no prior anti-tumor treatment exposure; presence of at least one measurable tumor as per RECIST v1.1; ECOG performance status score of either 0 or 1; and a Child-Pugh A or B. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) into two groups. Randomization is stratified by the presence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs no), and baseline alpha-fetoprotein concentration (<400 ng/mL vs ≥400 ng/mL). There are 2 arms in the study: (1) Arm A: FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2,5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 hours; q3w; up to 6 cycles) intravenously in combination with apatinib (250 mg po qd) and camrelizumab (200 mg iv q3w). (2) Arm B: hepatic arterial infusion FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil q3w; up to 6 cycles), combined with apatinib (250 mg po qd) and camrelizumab (200 mg iv q3w). The primary endpoint is 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary outcomes encompass the Objective response rate, Disease control rate, Duration of response, PFS, Overall survival (OS), along with 12-month PFS rate, 6-month and 12-month OS rates. The additional secondary endpoints include assessment of treatment-related adverse events. With the assumption of a median 6-month PFS rate of 85% in the Arm B and 71% in the Arm A (noninferiority margin, 14%), a total of 162 patients were required under a two-sided 5% significance level and 80% power. Allowing a dropout rate of 15%, we aimed to enroll 192 patients. The trial is currently screening eligible patients. Clinical trial information: NCT06172205 .

Characterization of Tumor Responses in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib in the Phase 3 Randomized Trial: REFLECT

Introduction: In REFLECT, lenvatinib was noninferior to sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC; median 13.6 vs. 12.3 months; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79–1.06). The objective response rate (ORR) with lenvatinib was 18.8% by blinded independent imaging review (IIR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); per modified RECIST (mRECIST), the ORR was 40.6%. We sought to further characterize these tumor responses and explore ORR’s importance among outcomes for patients with HCC. Methods: Efficacy assessments included all patients randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib treatment (if bodyweight ≥60 kg, 12 mg/day; if <60 kg, 8 mg/day). Time to first objective response (TTR) and duration of response (DOR) included patients who achieved a partial or complete tumor response. Tumors were assessed by IIR per RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST. Results: Four hundred seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib. By IIR, 90 patients (18.8%) achieved an objective response per RECIST v1.1, and 194 (40.6%) had an objective response per mRECIST. Median TTR/DOR were 2.8 months/7.4 months in responders per RECIST v1.1, and 1.9 months/7.3 months in responders per mRECIST, respectively. Per baseline disease characteristics, ORRs by Child-Pugh score (A5/A6) were 21.2%/11.2% per RECIST v1.1 and 42.9%/33.6% per mRECIST, respectively. By baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (<400/≥400 ng/mL), ORRs were 21.4%/15.4% per RECIST v1.1 and 45.6%/33.8% per mRECIST, respectively. Incidences of treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were 98.9% in responders per RECIST v1.1 and 97.9% in responders per mRECIST. Conclusions: Responses were seen even in those patients with more severe disease at baseline. Tumor responses occurred early and were durable.

Alpha-fetoprotein predicts the treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for gastric cancer patients

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are commonly used in conjunction with chemotherapy to improve treatment outcomes for patients with gastric cancer. Since AFP could influence immunity by both inhibiting natural killer (NK) cells and regulating negatively the function of dendritic cells, we evaluated the influence of baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels on the curative effect of ICIs in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 158 AGC patients who underwent ICI treatment. The patients were divided into high and low groups based on the AFP threshold of 20 ng/ml. The efficacy of ICI treatment was assessed using objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe higher levels of baseline AFP were found to be associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of ICIs, as evidenced by a DCR of 50.0% in the group with high AFP levels compared to 87.7% in the group with low AFP levels (P < 0.001). Further analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival techniques indicated that a high AFP level was linked to shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.001) in AGC individuals receiving ICIs. After propensity score matching, a log rank test revealed that the high AFP group had a decrease in median PFS (P = 0.011) and median OS (P = 0.036) compared to the low AFP group. The high AFP levels also showed its association with shorter PFS and OS in the subgroup analysis of ICI plus chemotherapy patients.ConclusionsBaseline AFP levels may predict immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in AGC patients.

Prognostic significance of C-reactive protein in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is both an inflammatory and prognostic marker in various cancers. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of CRP and the prognostic factors in patients who were administered with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ+BEV) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 213 patients who received ATZ+BEV for HCC from November 2020 to March 2023 at 15 hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective study. The prognosis was analyzed by subdividing the patients based on baseline characteristics, radiologic response, and treatment lines. Accuracy of survival prediction was assessed using CRP, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), C-reactive protein and alpha fetoprotein in immunotherapy (CRAFITY), and Glasgow Prognostic Score. Compared with patients with baseline CRP <1mg/dL, those with baseline CRP ≥1mg/dL (n=45) had a significantly higher baseline albumin-bilirubin score and AFP levels, significantly lower disease control rate (62.2%), and significantly shorter median overall survival (hazards ratios 2.292; 95% confidence interval 1.313-5.107; log-rank test, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified CRP ≥1mg/dL, AFP ≥100ng/mL, and modified albumin-bilirubin grade as the significant prognostic factors. The baseline CRP, AFP, CRAFITY, and Glasgow Prognostic Score demonstrated higher discrimination for 1-year survival prediction after first-line ATZ+BEV administration, compared with beyond second line, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.759, 0.761, 0.805, and 0.717, respectively. CRP was a significant biomarker in patients treated with ATZ+BEV for HCC. Elevated CRP levels may indicate aggressive cancer progression and potential resistance to ATZ+BEV therapy.

Reclassification of therapeutic response of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma to anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy using alpha RECIST.

To assess the therapeutic response of HCC to antiangiogenic therapy plus immunotherapy by integrating RECIST 1.1 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response at the 6th week to predict overall survival (OS). This retrospective study included 150 and 214 patients with HCC who received combination therapy in training and validation cohorts. The medical images and AFP levels obtained at baseline and 6th week were collected. AFP response stratification: partial response (PR): AFP% ≥ 75% decline; stable disease (SD): AFP% < 75% decline and ≤ 10% elevation; progressive disease (PD): AFP% > 10% elevation. The alpha-RECIST was: PR: RECIST 1.1-PR or AFP-PR; PD: AFP-PD or RECIST 1.1-PD and does not satisfy AFP-PR; SD: neither PR nor PD. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. The predictive ability of various criteria was evaluated using the concordance index and time-dependent area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. RECIST 1.1 achieved significant OS stratification (p = 0.020) for AFP < 20ng/mL. For AFP ≥ 20ng/mL, alpha-RECIST showed better performance than RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and AFP response according to C-index (0.73 vs 0.66 vs 0.68 vs 0.69). The National Cancer Center (NCC) strategy utilized RECIST 1.1 for AFP < 20ng/mL and alpha-RECIST for AFP ≥ 20ng/mL and showed better performance than RECIST 1.1, mRECIST and AFP response according to C-index (0.73 vs 0.67 vs 0.69 vs 0.64). The performances of alpha-RECIST and NCC Strategy were confirmed in the validation cohort (C-index = 0.77 and 0.74). The alpha-RECIST and NCC Strategy achieved better survival stratification in patients with HCC under combination therapy in the AFP ≥ 20ng/mL group and the whole cohort compared to the RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and AFP response. The alpha-RECIST and National Cancer Center strategy are optimal methods for determining therapeutic response to a combination of anti-angiogenic therapy plus immunotherapy and facilitating accurate prognostic stratification for HCC in the AFP ≥ 20ng/mL group and the whole cohort, which may help oncologists for early identification of responders and progression at 6weeks and clinical decision-making. • RECIST 1.1 is indicated for patients with baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) < 20ng/mL. • For patients with baseline AFP ≥ 20ng/mL, integrating RECIST 1.1 and AFP response (alpha-RECIST) may aid in the early identification of survival benefits and progression definition prior to the administration of additional efficacious drugs. • The National Cancer Center strategy is an optimal stratified strategy for determining therapeutic response to a combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy for HCC based on baseline AFP levels.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with dynamic changes in AFP undergoing locoregional treatments.

Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is an important clinical indicator for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our team's previous study showed that patients with negative AFP at baseline and positive AFP at relapse had a worse prognosis (N-P). Therefore, the aim of our study was to develop and validate a nomogram for this group of patients. A total of 513 patients with HCC who received locoregional treatments at Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2012 to December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. Patients admitted from 2012 to 2015 were assigned to the training cohort (n = 335), while 2016 to 2019 were in the validation cohort (n =183). The clinical and pathological features of patients were collected, and independent risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis as a basis for developing a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves in the training and validation cohorts. The content of the nomogram includes gender, tumor number, tumor size, lymphocyte, direct bilirubin (DBIL), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and prealbumin. The C-index (0.717 and 0.752) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUCs (0.721, 0.825, 0.845, and 0.740, 0.868, 0.837) of the training and validation cohorts proved the good predictive performance of the nomogram. Calibration curves and DCA curves suggested accuracy and net clinical benefit rates. The nomogram enabled to classify of patients with dynamic changes in AFP into three groups according to the risk of recurrence: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. There was a statistically significant difference in RFS between the three groups in the training and validation cohorts (P<0.001). The nomogram developed and validated in this study had good predictive power for patients with dynamic changes in AFP.

Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

4079 Background: Combined systemic and local therapy is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and PD-1 antibodies are all recommended for patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with TKIs and camrelizumab in the treatment of uHCC. Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (ChiCTR2000039508), patients with intermediate-stage uHCC who had a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7 and had not received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment would receive treatment with TACE followed by immunotherapy with camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus a TKI agent selected from lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight &lt;60 kg), sorafenib 400 mg bid or donafenib 200 mg bid until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. During the study treatment, patients assessed as eligible for resection would undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per modified RECIST. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Results: From September 2020 to November 2021, 87 patients (81 men and 6 women; median age, 56 years) were enrolled. Among them, 43 (49.4%) patients had extrahepatic metastases, and 65 (74.7%) patients had HBV infection. As of September 28, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (0.83-24.9) months. A total of 34 patients (39.1%) died, and the median OS was not reached. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.8-13.1). The ORR rate was 71.3% (62/87), and the DCR rate was 89.7% (78/87) per mRECIST. According to RECIST version 1.1, the ORR rate was 35.6% (31/87), and the DCR rate was 87.4% (76/87). The ORR and PFS showed consistent benefits in subgroups based on ECOG score, HBV infection, baseline alpha-fetoprotein level, combined TKI, and the number of TACE treatments. Ten patients (11.5%) successfully underwent conversion therapy and all achieved R0 resection. Two patients achieved a complete pathological response (pCR) and four achieved a major pathological response (MPR). The most common AEs were hypoproteinemia (92%), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (80.5%), elevated glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (79.3%), elevated bilirubin (78.2%), abdominal pain (62.1%), nausea (33.3%), and RCCEP (26.4%). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions was 67.8%, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: TACE combined with TKI and camrelizumab showed promising clinical benefits. It can effectively control tumor progression and provide opportunities for resection with acceptable safety, which will bring great benefits to uHCC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000039508 .

Clinical efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with regorafenib therapy as second⁃line regimen for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16105 Background: Combined systemic and local therapy is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and PD-1 antibodies are all recommended for patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with TKIs and camrelizumab in the treatment of uHCC. Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (ChiCTR2000039508), patients with intermediate-stage uHCC who had a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7 and had not received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment would receive treatment with TACE followed by immunotherapy with camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus a TKI agent selected from lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight &lt;60 kg), sorafenib 400 mg bid or donafenib 200 mg bid until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. During the study treatment, patients assessed as eligible for resection would undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per modified RECIST. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Results: From September 2020 to November 2021, 87 patients (81 men and 6 women; median age, 56 years) were enrolled. Among them, 43 (49.4%) patients had extrahepatic metastases, and 65 (74.7%) patients had HBV infection. As of September 28, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (0.83-24.9) months. A total of 34 patients (39.1%) died, and the median OS was not reached. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.8-13.1). The ORR rate was 71.3% (62/87), and the DCR rate was 89.7% (78/87) per mRECIST. According to RECIST version 1.1, the ORR rate was 35.6% (31/87), and the DCR rate was 87.4% (76/87). The ORR and PFS showed consistent benefits in subgroups based on ECOG score, HBV infection, baseline alpha-fetoprotein level, combined TKI, and the number of TACE treatments. Ten patients (11.5%) successfully underwent conversion therapy and all achieved R0 resection. Two patients achieved a complete pathological response (pCR) and four achieved a major pathological response (MPR). The most common AEs were hypoproteinemia (92%), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (80.5%), elevated glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (79.3%), elevated bilirubin (78.2%), abdominal pain (62.1%), nausea (33.3%), and RCCEP (26.4%). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions was 67.8%, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: TACE combined with TKI and camrelizumab showed promising clinical benefits. It can effectively control tumor progression and provide opportunities for resection with acceptable safety, which will bring great benefits to uHCC.

Association between early response of alpha-fetoprotein and treatment efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study from China.

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a well-identified biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, only limited AFP-related studies have evaluated its early response to systemic therapy. This study was performed with the aim of assessing the value of early AFP response in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced HCC patients receiving systemic therapy. This cohort study included HCC patients with baseline AFP ≥ 200 ng/ml and no prior treatment history. A > 20% decline in the serum AFP level from baseline to the first follow-up (i.e., 4~6 weeks after treatment) was defined as an early AFP response. Patient demographic information, clinical characteristics, radiological response, and survival rates were compared between patients with early AFP response and patients without early AFP response. We further utilized multivariate Cox regression to seek characteristics related to OS and PFS. Among 154 patients, 69 patients (44.8%) showed an early AFP response. The disease control rate (76.8 vs. 54.1%; P = 0.003) and objective response rate (38.4 vs. 11.8%; P = 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with an early AFP response. By performing multivariate analysis, early AFP response remained a prognostic factor for longer PFS (HR 0.546; 95% CI 0.371-0.804; P = 0.002) and longer OS (HR 0.529; 95% CI 0.335-0.834; P = 0.006). An early AFP response is correlated with longer overall survival and progression-free survival for advanced HCC patients receiving systemic therapy. Moreover, an early AFP response is an independent prognostic factor for longer OS and PFS.

Serum Tumor Marker Response Predicts Survival and Intracranial Control after Radiation Therapy for Germ Cell Tumor Brain Metastases

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Patients with brain metastases (BM) from germ cell tumors (GCT) demonstrate poor overall survival (OS). However, multimodality treatment enables durable disease control in some patients. Serum tumor markers including beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) are used to evaluate response to systemic therapy. However, their utility in assessing the efficacy of intracranial radiation therapy (RT) is unclear. We evaluated whether changes in β-HCG and AFP after RT for GCT BM predict OS and freedom from intracranial progression (iPFS). <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Patients with GCT BM who received intracranial RT at our institution were identified retrospectively. At least one β-HCG or AFP value before and after RT was required for inclusion. Serum tumor marker values were obtained prior to RT and 1 month after RT. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated changes in β-HCG and AFP as predictors of OS and iPFS. Patients with normal tumor markers prior to RT were excluded from analyses. <h3>Results</h3> Sixty-two male patients who received RT between 2002 and 2021 were included. Median age was 30 years (range, 2 to 61). The primary tumor was testicular in 81% and mediastinal in 15%. Histology was seminoma in 10%. At diagnosis, the median number of BM was 2, and the median largest diameter was 1.8 cm. Initial RT included whole brain radiation therapy in 55%, stereotactic radiosurgery in 34%, and both in 10%. 31% had resection preceding RT. Most patients had extracranial disease (79%) and received chemotherapy within a month of RT (66%). During RT, radiographic progression of extracranial disease occurred in 34% of patients. Median OS and iPFS were 20.6 and 27.7 months, respectively. Among 41 patients with baseline β-HCG above the normal range, β-HCG decreased at 1 month after RT in 51%. Patients with decreased β-HCG, versus those with increased β-HCG, had significantly better OS (median not reached versus 5.4 months) and iPFS (median not reached versus 4.7 months). These correlations remained significant on multivariate analysis, controlling for largest BM diameter and RT modality (OS: HR = 13, 95% CI = [4.6, 37], p = 1 × 10⁻⁶; iPFS: HR = 6.4, 95% CI = [2.2, 19], p = 6 × 10⁻⁴). These correlations also remained significant whether or not patients had extracranial disease progression during RT (p < 0.05). Among 20 patients with baseline AFP above the normal range, AFP decreased at 1 month after RT in 75%. Likewise, decreased AFP was correlated with better OS on univariate regression (p = 0.04). <h3>Conclusion</h3> To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate changes in serum tumor markers as predictors of outcomes after RT for GCT BM. Decrease in β-HCG one month after RT was associated with better OS and iPFS on multivariate analysis, and likewise, decrease in AFP was associated with better OS on univariate analysis. These data indicate that post-RT β-HCG and AFP levels are useful predictors of outcomes in patients with GCT BM.

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients with HCV-Related HCC Undergoing Molecular Targeted Therapies: Beyond a Sustained Virological Response.

Simple SummaryThe eradication of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has had a significant impact on the management of patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its eradication has not completely resolved survival issues in patients with HCV-related HCC. Therefore, the present study investigated prognostic factors for survival in patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing molecular targeted therapies. In total, 359 HCC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 16.0 months (range, 1.0–115.7) and the median duration of first-line systemic therapy was 3.7 months (range, 0.7–86.9). The achievement of a sustained virological response (SVR) (p < 0.001), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade II/III (p < 0.001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C (p = 0.005), extrahepatic spread (p < 0.001), baseline AFP level ≥ 90 (p = 0.038), baseline DCP level ≥ 500 (p < 0.001), and a fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index ≥ 4 (p = 0.003) were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.Background: The treatment of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has reduced the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-related mortality. Many patients with advanced HCC have achieved longer survival through systemic chemotherapy. However, survivors of HCC may develop liver cancer during and after treatment. Therefore, the present study investigated prognostic factors for survival in patients with HCV-related HCC in the new era of molecular targeted therapy. Methods: A total of 359 patients with HCV-related HCC treated with first-line chemotherapy were reviewed. A Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan–Meier curve were used to identify prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: The median follow-up duration was 16.0 months (range, 1.0–115.7) and the median duration of first-line systemic therapy was 3.73 months (range, 0.7–86.9). The achievement of a sustained virological response (SVR) (p < 0.001), albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grade II/III (p < 0.001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C (p = 0.005), extrahepatic spread (p < 0.001), baseline AFP (alpha-fetoprotein) level ≥ 90 (p = 0.038), baseline DCP (des-γ-carboxy prothrombin) level ≥ 500 (p < 0.001), and a fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index ≥ 4 (p = 0.003) were identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions: The achievement of SVR was most strongly associated with overall survival. Other factors, such as the BCLC stage, extrahepatic spread, baseline tumor marker (AFP/DCP) levels, ALBI grade, and FIB-4 index need to be considered in the management of patients with HCV-related HCC.

Assessment and Monitoring of Response to Systemic Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Insights.

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has become more complex as novel therapies have been proven effective. After sorafenib, the approval of other multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) and immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) has considerably increased the number of systemic therapies available. Therefore, careful assessment and monitoring of response to systemic treatment are essential to identify surrogate endpoints of overall survival (OS) in clinical trials and reliable tools to gauge treatment benefit in clinical practice. Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) are early informative parameters of efficacy that are not influenced by further lines of therapy. However, none of them has shown sufficient surrogacy to be recommended in place of OS in phase 3 trials. With such a wealth of therapeutic options, the prime intent of tumor assessments is no longer limited to identifying progressive disease to spare ineffective treatments to non-responders. Indeed, the early detection of responders could also help tailor treatment sequencing. Tumor assessment relies on the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), which are easy to interpret – being based on dimensional principles – but could misread the activity of targeted agents. The HCC-specific modified RECIST (mRECIST), considering both the MKI-induced biological modifications and some of the cirrhosis-induced liver changes, better capture tumor response. Yet, mRECIST could not be considered a standard in advanced HCC. Further prognosticators including progression patterns, baseline and on-treatment liver function deterioration, and baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and AFP response have been extensively evaluated for MKIs. However, limited information is available for patients receiving ICIs and regarding their predictive role. Finally, there is increasing interest in incorporating novel imaging techniques which go beyond sizes and novel serum biomarkers in the advanced HCC framework. Hopefully, multiparametric models grouping dimensional and functional radiological parameters with biochemical markers will most precisely reflect treatment response.

Liver resection for single large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prognostic factors study

Introduction and objectivesLiver resection is the only curative therapeutic option for large hepatocellular carcinoma (> 5 cm), but survival is worse than in smaller tumours, mostly due to the high recurrence rate. There is currently no proper tool for stratifying relapse risk. Herein, we investigated prognostic factors before hepatectomy in patients with a single large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methodsWe retrospectively identified 119 patients who underwent liver resection for a single large HCC in 2 tertiary academic French centres and collected pre- and post-operative clinical, biological and radiological features. The primary outcome was overall survival at five years. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival at five years and prognostic factors for recurrence. ResultsA total of 84% of the patients were male, and the median age was 66 years old (IQR 58–74). Thirty-nine (33%) had Child–Pugh A cirrhosis, and the mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 6 (6–6). The aetiology of liver disease was predominantly alcohol-related (48%), followed by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (22%), hepatitis B (18%) and hepatitis C (10%). The mean tumour size was 70 mm (55–110). The median overall survival was 72.5 months (IC 95%: 56.2-88.7), and the five-year overall survival was 55.1 ± 5.5%. The median recurrence-free survival was 26.6 months (95% CI: 16.0-37.1), and the five-year recurrence-free survival rate was 37.8 ± 5%. In multivariate analysis, preoperative prognostic factors for recurrence were baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 7 ng/mL (p<0.001), portal veinous invasion (p=0.003) and cirrhosis (p=0.020). Using these factors, we created a simple recurrence-risk scoring system that classified three groups with distinct disease-free survival medians (p<0.001): no risk factors (65 months), 1 risk factor (36 months), and ≥2 risk factors (8.9 months). ConclusionLiver resection is the only curative option for large HCC, and we confirmed that survival could be acceptable in experienced centres. Recurrence is the primary issue of surgery, and we proposed a simple preoperative score to help identify patients with the most worrisome prognosis and possible candidates for combined therapy.

Second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Time for more individualized treatment options?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequently diagnosed primary tumor of the liver and is usually detected as advanced disease. It is an aggressive disease that often progresses rapidly when it fails to respond to treatment. As such, patients have limited opportunities to try different subsequent-line treatment regimens. In the last 5 years, the number of agents and/or regimens available for the treatment of advanced HCC has significantly increased, which has made treatment choices for this patient population increasingly complex. In the second-line setting, several phase III trials of regorafenib (RESORCE), ramucirumab (REACH/REACH-2), and cabozantinib (CELESTIAL) have demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with the disease. However, the median overall survival of patients with advanced HCC remains unchanged at approximately 12 mo from the start of systemic second-line therapy, with a limited duration of response. Evidence from the REACH/REACH-2 trials demonstrated for the first time that baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels can be used as an identification factor to select those who are likely to benefit the most from ramucirumab treatment. Ramucirumab is both well tolerated and efficacious and has a clinically acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it should be considered an option for patients with AFP levels ≥ 400 ng/mL.

Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first line sorafenib: Pooled efficacy and safety in Chinese patients across two global randomized phase 3 studies (REACH-2 and REACH).

e16081 Background: REACH-2 and REACH were two global, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PL)-controlled phase 3 studies of Ramucirumab (RAM) versus PL in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib. REACH-2 confirmed the RAM treatment benefit for patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, consistent with results in a prespecified subgroup of patients in REACH with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. A pooled analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM in Chinese patients (including patients from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan) from REACH-2 and REACH with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. Methods: Except for AFP level requirement, REACH-2 and REACH were similar in study design and included patients who had advanced HCC (BCLC stage C or B disease refractory or not amenable to locoregional therapy), Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior sorafenib. Patients were randomized to RAM (8 mg/kg) I.V. or PL Q2W, plus best supportive care, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Individual patient data were pooled from REACH-2 and REACH (AFP ≥400 mg/mL). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were reported. Efficacy analyses were stratified by study to account for any potential difference in the two studies. Results: Data from 155 Chinese patients were pooled from REACH (51) and REACH-2 (104) (N = 98 RAM vs N = 57 PL). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms in pooled data set; however, lower median level of AFP was noted in the RAM arm. In the pooled population, RAM treatment numerically improved OS over PL (median OS 7.1 months vs 4.7 months; HR = 0.735 [95% CI: 0.512, 1.055]). Improvements in PFS (median PFS 2.6 months vs 1.5 months; HR = 0.666 [95% CI: 0.459, 0.967]), ORR (3.1% vs 0%), and DCR (44.9% vs 29.8%) were also observed. Hypertension (6.1% vs 1.8%), pneumonia (5.1% vs 1.8%), and hyponatremia (5.1% vs 1.8%) were the Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among ≥ 5% patients that was more frequently observed in the RAM arm compared with the PL arm. Conclusions: Pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials of RAM as second-line treatment in patients with HCC following sorafenib demonstrated a clinically meaningful benefit with a manageable safety profile in Chinese HCC patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. Treatment benefits in OS observed in the pooled Chinese population were consistent with the entire population from REACH/REACH-2 (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL). Clinical trial information: NCT01140347, NCT02435433.

Decision-Making Scoring System for the Repetition of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) have heterogeneous tumor burden and liver function. Therefore, the selection of patients for repeated cTACE is challenging owing to different outcomes. This study aimed to establish a decision-making scoring system for repeated cTACE to guide further treatment. All patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent cTACE between 2008 and 2019 were included and randomly assigned into training (n = 324) and validation (n = 162) cohorts. Tumor Size, number of Masses, Albumin-bilirubin score, baseline Alpha-fetoprotein level, and Response to initial cTACE session were selected to generate a "SMAART" score in the training cohort. Patients were stratified according to the SMAART score: low risk, 0-2; medium risk, 3-4; and high risk, 5-8. Prediction error curves based on the integrated Brier score and the Harrell C-index validated the SMAART scores and compared them with the Assessment for Retreatment with Transarterial chemoembolization (ART) score. The low-risk group had the longest median overall survival of 39.0 months, followed by the medium-risk and high-risk groups of 21.2 months and 10.5 months, respectively, with significant differences (P < 0.001). The validation cohort had similar results. The high-risk group had 63.1% TACE refractory cases. The Harrell C-indexes were 0.562 and 0.665 and the integrated Brier scores were 0.176 and 0.154 for ART and SMAART scores, respectively. The SMAART score can aid clinicians in selecting appropriate candidates for subsequent cTACE. A SMAART score of ≥5 after the first cTACE session identified patients with poor prognosis who may not benefit from additional cTACE sessions.

Phase I/II trial of BMS-986205 and nivolumab as first line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16200 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an intracellular enzyme expressed by HCC which helps to orchestrate immune suppression within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and may contribute to primary and acquired resistance of PD-(L)1 inhibitors. BMS-986205 is a novel oral drug that potently and selectively inhibits IDO1. This Phase I/II study is evaluating the safety and tolerability of the combination of BMS-986205 and nivolumab as first-line therapy in HCC. Methods: Patients (pts) ≥18y with untreated, unresectable/metastatic HCC received BMS-986205 in combination with nivolumab. A fixed dose of Nivolumab 240mg/m2 IV was administered on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle. BMS-986205 was an oral tablet administered daily; a total of two dose levels (50-100mg) were given to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLT) during the dose-escalation Phase I of the study. Safety was assessed using CTCAE v5.0 criteria, and efficacy was assessed by objective response rate (ORR) using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included preliminary data on disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), ORR using immune RECIST criteria (iRECIST), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Here we report the results of the dose escalation cohort. Eight pts were treated with median age 69y [60-76]; 75% male; and PS 0 (3 pts) or 1 (5 pts). Pts were White (62.5%), Asian (25%), and African American (12.5%). Six of 8 pts had underlying viral hepatitis (5 hepatitis C, 1 hepatitis B), and all pts were Child Pugh A at enrollment with median baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level 41.8 [3.8–917.2]; 4 pts received prior local therapies. A total of 91 cycles of therapy were administered; 2 pts received 27 and 43 cycles of treatment each. Six pts were evaluable for DLT; 2 pts were replaced for DLT assessment due to insufficient dose administered, unrelated to toxicity. No DLTs were observed at either the 50 or 100mg dose of BMS-986205. There were 24 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 4 of which were Grade 3 events; there were no Grade 4-5 events. The most common TRAEs of all grades were AST elevation and ALT elevation in 3 pts, and diarrhea, maculopapular rash and increased alkaline phosphatase in 2 pts each. Grade 3 events were diarrhea and AST elevation (1 pt), and hyperglycemia and pancreatitis requiring treatment discontinuation (1 pt). Eight pts were evaluable for efficacy with best response of partial response in 1 pt (12.5%) and stable disease in 3 pts (37.5%), yielding a DCR of 50%. Median PFS was 8.5 weeks; median OS has not been reached. Conclusions: Combination BMS-986205 and nivolumab showed a manageable safety profile with durable benefit as 1st line therapy in a meaningful subset of patients with unresectable/metastatic HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03695250.

Personalized treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.

Systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been advancing rapidly over the last decade. More novel agents, including both targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, are available for physicians to use sequentially or concurrently for patients with advanced HCC. Despite more options, only a proportion of patients benefit from each regimen. Therefore, clinicians are facing challenges on how to choose the right regimen for the right patient with HCC, which raises the importance of personalized treatment approach. To advance personalized treatment for HCC, one approach relies on the acquisition of biomarker data from clinical trials to evaluate clinical parameters or genotypes in association with outcomes of selected drugs. This approach has led to finding of high baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels in association with benefits of ramucirumab. Cumulative findings from multiple clinical trials and translational studies also suggest that selected etiology and/or genotype of HCC could predict resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The second approach is to decipher the tumor heterogeneity of HCC with an aim to identify clinically relevant patterns to guide clinical decisions. Tumor heterogeneity could exist within a single tumor (intra-tumoral heterogeneity), among different tumors in the same patient (inter-tumoral heterogeneity) or between primary and recurrent tumors (temporal tumor heterogeneity). The analyses of tumor heterogeneity have also been powered by coverage of tumor immune environment and incorporation of circulating tumor nucleic acid technology. Emerging publications have been reported above tumor heterogeneity exist in HCC, which is potentially clinically impactful.

The α-RECIST (RECIST 1.1 Combined With Alpha Fetoprotein): A Novel Tool for Identifying Tumor Response of Conversion-Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Hepatectomy.

PurposeTo develop a novel criterion based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and evaluate its performance in tumor response for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving conversion-radiotherapy before hepatectomy.MethodFrom June 2012 to December 2020, a total of 39 patients with uHCC, who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) before hepatectomy, were retrospectively included in this study. Pre- and post-treatment contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) scans were performed in all patients. Eight modified criteria were developed with the combination of RECIST 1.1, modified RECIST (mRECIST), and the percentage change of AFP, baseline AFP. The endpoint events were recurrence-free survival (RFS).ResultsThe median RFS and OS was 26.5 (IQR, 15.7-43.1), 38.8 (IQR, 18.4-53.6) months. An optimal revised evaluation criterion named α-RECIST (alpha fetoprotein-RECIST 1.1) was developed by combining the RECIST 1.1 with the AFPΔ (cut-off value, 76%). Patients defined as responders by α-RECIST showed significantly better RFS and OS than those defined as non-responders (p = 0.035, 0.048). The other criteria (RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, αΔ-mRECIST, α&Δ-RECIST, α&Δ-mRECIST, αBL-RECIST, αBL-mRECIST, α&BL-RECIST, α&BL-mRECIST) all failed to identify responders from non-responders (p = 0.405, 0.201, 0.773, 0.424, 0.266, 0.060, 0.721, 0.644, 0.910, respectively) when correlated with RFS. Responders according to α-RECIST showed significant better RFS compared to non-responders [HR, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.98); p=0.046], but no statistical significance was observed in terms of OS [HR, 0.33 (95% CI: 0.11, 1.05); p = 0.06].ConclusionsPatients identified as responders by α-RECIST provided significant better RFS. The α-RECIST criteria might be a promising tool for identifying tumor response of conversion-radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma before hepatectomy.