To the Editor: Bartonella alsatica was first isolated from the blood of wild rabbits from the Alsace region in France (1). This bacterium is now considered an emerging infectious disease zoonotic agent in persons in close contact with rabbits; at least 2 human cases of endocarditis and 1 human case of lymphadenitis have been reported (2–4). In this study, we report the molecular detection of B. alsatica in fleas (Spilopsyllus cuniculi) collected from rabbits in southern France. During January and February 2008, a total of 60 fleas were collected from wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from 3 regions in southern France: Canohes (42°38′N, 2°51′E), Pollestres (42°38′N, 2°52′E), and Toreilles (42°45′N, 2°58′E). The fleas were collected and identified phenotypically, kept in ethanol, and sent to Unite de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes in September 2009. DNA from these fleas, as well as negative controls from uninfected lice maintained as colonies in our laboratory, were extracted by using a QIAmp Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), as described (5). Identification of flea species at the molecular level was achieved by PCR amplification and sequencing of partial siphonapteran 18S rDNA gene (1.95 kbp) as described (5). Sequences were assembled in Sequencher 4.2 (GeneCodes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). DNA was used as templates in a real-time quantitative PCR specific for a portion of the Bartonella genus 16S–23S intergenic spacer (ITS) performed in a Smart cycler instrument (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), as described (2). Positive samples at the genus level were confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing of the Bartonella ITS region, as described (2). Finally, B. alsatica amplification and specific identification was confirmed by using 2 new specific PCRs with primers and TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) specific for a portion of the heat shock protein 60 (hsp60) and the DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrB) genes of B. alsatica (Table). Specificity of these 2 PCRs was verified in silico (computer simulation) and by using a panel of 14 Bartonella species available in our laboratory (data not shown). Table Oligonucleotide primers and TaqMan* fluorescent probe sequences of hsp60 and gyrB genes used for reverse transcription PCRs of Bartonella alsatica† All fleas were morphologically identified as S. cuniculi by using current taxonomic criteria (6). Moreover, the 18S rRNA gene amplified and sequenced as described (6) from fleas gave a sequence with 100% similarity with the sequence of S. cuniculi fleas deposited in GenBank (accession no. {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:EU336097,term_id:169248332,term_text:EU336097}}EU336097). B. alsatica was detected by ITS reverse transcription–PCR in 8 (13.3%) of 60 fleas: 6 from Toreilles (17.6%, 6/34) region, 2 from Canohes (10.5%; 2/19), and none from Pollestres (0/7). Sequences obtained after PCR amplification and sequencing of partial ITS showed 96.6% identity with B. alsatica (GenBank accession no. {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:HM060955,term_id:296881361,term_text:HM060955}}HM060955). Using our 2 new PCRs specific for partial hsp60 and gyrB genes from B. alsatica, we identified all Bartonella spp.–positive fleas, which had cycle threshold values ranging from 12.15 to <32.35 and 13.21 to <36.99 for hsp60 and gyrB genes, respectively. We report the specific detection of B. alsatica in S. cuniculi rabbit fleas from southern France using 4 different PCRs and sequencing, including 2 new reverse transcription PCRs described in this study. There is 1 report of molecular detection of B. alsatica from S. cuniculi fleas from a European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Andalusia, Spain (7). Although S. cuniculi fleas are rare on cats, this study demonstrates that cats in contact with rabbits may be infected by these fleas and consequently become a potential source for B. alsatica transmission to humans. Marquez has also recently reported the molecular detection of B. alsatica in blood from 48/279 (17.2%) of wild rabbits (O. cuniculus) in Andalusia, Spain (8). In conclusion, further research is needed to better understand the mode of transmission of B. alsatica in humans and mammals and the role of rabbit fleas for potential transmission for these bacteria. The recent description of B. alsatica as a human pathogen and the discovery of rabbit fleas as a potential vector reemphasize the emergence potential of this bacterium in humans who have close contact with rabbits.