activity of the lymph nodes described on the PET scan. Results: A total of 498 patients (median age 64, 84.13%males) with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer underwent complete EUS for initial staging at our center during 1999 to 2009. Adenocarcinoma was present in 440 patients and squamous cell cancer in 53 patients. The T stage distribution among 498 patients was T1 (including T1a, T1b and undifferentiated T1) was 91(18%), T2 was 59(12%), T3 was 317(64%), T4 was 14(3%) and T0 was 17(3%). There were 31 patients who underwent PET scan at another hospital and their report was not available. There were 170 lymph nodes that underwent FNA of which 96 lymph nodes (in 83 patients) were found to be positive for malignant cells. Among these, 72 lymph nodes (in 60 patients) were noted on the PET scan, 18 lymph nodes (in 18 patients) were not noted on the PET scan and 8 lymph nodes belonged to patients with no record of a PET scan either at our facility or outside. Among the 72 malignant lymph nodes noted on the PET scan, 12 lymph nodes were not FDG-avid. Table 1 shows the distribution of FNA positive lymph nodes and their detection on PET scan. FNA positive lymph nodes not noted on the PET scan were more commonly found below the diaphragm. Conclusion: EUS and PET scan are complimentary for esophageal cancer staging. The findings of PET scan should not limit an endosonographer in performing a complete lymph node survey.