Reviewed by: Unwritten Verities: The Making of England’s Vernacular Legal Culture, 1463–1549 by Sebastian Sobecki Peter Marshall Unwritten Verities: The Making of England’s Vernacular Legal Culture, 1463–1549. By Sebastian Sobecki. [ReFormations Medieval and Early Modern.] (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 2015. Pp. x, 257. $38.00 paperback. ISBN 978-0-268-04145-8) The title of Sebastian Sobecki’s thoughtful and ambitiously interdisciplinary study is designed to pinpoint a paradox in English legal and political culture after the turn of the sixteenth century. Unwritten Verities was the disparaging—indeed, sarcastic—term employed by Protestants to refer to beliefs and practices of traditional religion that lacked grounding in scripture, practices that were at best unnecessary and at worst damnable. A reliance on authorized text was a wellspring of the cultural transformations effected by the Protestant Reformation, as it was of the humanist movement that preceded and—perhaps—inspired it. Yet the English common-law tradition, which, in the political dimension of the Reformation struggle, triumphed over its canon law rival, was itself stubbornly reliant on unwritten custom and remembered precedent, rather than on any kind of textual positivism. The problem of its nonvulnerability to Protestant critique, and eventual apotheosis as an icon of insular Protestant tradition, is an intriguing one, which has not properly been framed as a problem before. Sobecki’s account of how English common-law culture evolved to surmount the challenge of the Reformation is one in which vernacularity (encompassing Law French) plays a crucial transitional role. A central actor is the common-law theorist, Christopher St. German, often regarded as an intellectual architect of the Henrician Reformation, whose influential textbook, Doctor and Student (1528–30), stressed the textual witness of statutes, yearbooks, and law reports, and who invoked reason as a kind of “inner book” validating the antiquity of the law. Another key player is the printer and polemicist John Rastell, who produced a number of legal texts, including editions of statutes and a law dictionary. These endeavors were not only commercially motivated but also consciously sought, Sobecki argues, to reach out to a “horizontal readership” and to widen social participation in legal thought. Here Sobecki detaches Rastell and other early Tudor common law advocates from the mainstream of humanist thinking (exemplified by Rastell’s brother-in-law, Thomas More), which was much more socially elitist in its prescriptions for the improved health of the common weal. A longer trajectory connects them to the much-discussed Lancastrian theorist Sir John Fortescue, whom Sobecki seeks to rescue from Whiggish lionizing but nonetheless regards as a powerful advocate of wider political participation. The proof of the [End Page 608] pudding is in the rebellions of 1549, which Sobecki, drawing on recent historical scholarship, convincingly portrays as characterized by popular legal awareness to a quite remarkable extent. None of this makes for particularly easy reading. Sobecki has a fondness for modish literary-critical jargon, and the structure of the book is at times unhelpfully labyrinthine. Nevertheless, he is to be lauded for encouraging both cultural and literary historians to think harder about the law as a barometer of change and for challenging the still entrenched periodization either side of the arbitrary date of 1500. Peter Marshall University of Warwick Copyright © 2016 The Catholic University of America Press