Outcomes Of Bariatric Surgery In Patients Research Articles

Circulating biomarker profile changes in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery

Bariatric surgery (BS) remains the most effective treatment for morbid obesity (MO). It`s relevant to identify biomarkers for predicting the outcome of BS in patients with MO. The aim of the study was to determine the dynamical change in the biomarker levels in patients undergoing BS and apparently healthy donors. Serum and plasma samples were obtained from 66 patients, of which 26 patients with MO (aged 26–72 years) underwent BS, and 40 healthy donors, at the age of 56 ± 10.3 years. Patient samples were obtained the day before BS (first group), 3–7 months after BS (second group), and 7 or more months after BS (third group). Analyte concentrations were determined by multiplex immunoassay on the xMAP platform (Luminex). Spearman’s rank correlation was used. The nature of analyte variability was described by building multiple regression models. In the patients compared with healthy controls, differences in the levels of resistin, PAI1, MCP1, GLP1, leptin, FGF23, adiponectin, adipsin were observed. In patients after BS, the levels of resistin, ANGPTL6, FGF21, and leptin changed. In patients over 55 years old compared with younger patients, differences for total ANGPTL4, amylin, and pancreatic polypeptide were observed. Differences in levels of glucagon, resistin, GLP1 and leptin were noted between men and women. The dynamics of the levels of adipokines and incretins indicates biochemical changes in patients after BS compared with healthy persons.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Severe Obesity Compared to Patients with Non-Severe Obesity at A New Institution in The United Arab Emirates.

Background: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for weight loss, but a higher body mass index (BMI) may lead to higher postoperative complication rates. This study aims to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes between UAE patients with severe obesity (SO) [BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2] and non-severe obesity (NSO) [BMI < 50 kg/m2] undergoing primary bariatric surgery. Methods: From September 2015 to July 2019, 542 patients, 94 SO (56.5 ± 6.2 kg/m2) and 448 NSO (41.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2), were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Patients with SO were younger (33.8 ± 13.4 vs. 37.0 ± 11.5 years, p = 0.02) but otherwise had similar demographic characteristics. Their rates of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (39.4% SO vs. 44.4% NSO, p = 0.37) and sleeve gastrectomy (60.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.37) were similar. There were no differences between perioperative complications (6.4% SO vs. 5.8% NSO, p = 0.83), major postoperative complications (5.3% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.42), readmissions (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.36), or reoperations (3.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.78). There were no mortalities. Their total body weight loss was comparable at 12 months (28.1 ± 10.2% vs. 29.0 ± 7.7%, p = 0.58). Conclusions: Although a higher BMI may pose operative challenges, UAE patients with SO do not have worsened outcomes in bariatric surgery, demonstrating similarly low morbidity to patients with NSO, and similar rates of improvement in their BMI.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: An Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database

PurposeBariatric surgery has been reported to produce durable weight loss in the management of obesity; sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric procedure. Obesity is a common comorbidity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and the impact of IBD on short-term SG outcomes has not been widely reported. This study assessed whether IBD was associated with adverse post-SG outcomes.Materials and MethodsHospitalizations of patients undergoing SG in the United States were identified using the 2010–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) and stratified by IBD diagnosis. The SG cohort was propensity-matched based on age, biological sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbid diabetes, hypertension, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and discharge in quarter four. Primary aims were to compare in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, and all-cause 90-day readmission between patients with and without IBD. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and total hospital cost.ResultsA total of 2030 hospitalizations were matched. The odds of complication were 48% higher for hospitalizations of patients with IBD (11.1% vs. 7.8%; aOR 1.48, aOR 95% CI 1.10–2.00, p = .009). The most common complication was nausea (4.9% vs. 3.7%, p = .187). No statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause 90-day readmissions, LOS, or hospital cost.ConclusionHospitalizations of patients with IBD who underwent SG experienced significantly higher post-operative complication rates. However, the similar lengths of stay and readmission rates compared to propensity-matched SG hospitalizations without IBD suggest many complications were minor. SG remains a safe weight loss procedure for patients suffering from IBD and obesity.Graphical

Bariatric surgery outcomes in patients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorders.

Obesity is associated with many co-morbidities and can cause harm to physical and mental well-being. While much has been studied in the general population about the outcomes of bariatric surgery, its implications in patients with bipolar/schizoaffective disorder (BSD) are less well understood. We aimed to describe outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with BSD. Referral center for bariatric surgery. We conducted a retrospective chart review analysis of bariatric surgical procedures in patients with BSD between 2008 and 2021 at Mayo Clinic. Patients with BSD (cases) were matched via propensity score matching (1:2) with non-BSD controls based on surgical procedure, age, sex, body mass index, and type 2 diabetes. Hierarchical logistic regression model was performed using SAS software. We matched 71 patients with BSD with 142 controls in a 1:2 ratio. After adjusting for baseline preoperative weight, patients with BSD had a 3.4% greater total weight loss compared with controls over 24 months (P = .02 [95% CI, .65-6.08]). Remission in obesity-related diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and sleep apnea, was similar in both groups. Perioperative complication rates were similar other than deep venous thrombosis, which showed a higher rate in patients with BSD (P = .04). Patients with long-term BSD were at increased risk of alcohol use compared with controls. When compared with the general bariatric population, weight loss was similar to slightly improved, with a comparable risk and complication profile. Patients with BSD have increased alcohol use after bariatric surgery, highlighting the need for psychological care before and after surgery in this population.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Obesity increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), which has a major negative impact on global health. Bariatric surgery (BS) has demonstrated a substantial improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and thus, it has emerged as a potential therapeutic tool in order to prevent end-stage renal disease. A limited number of publications to date have examined the beneficial effects and risks of BS in patients with non-advanced stages of CKD. We aimed to investigate the safety of BS in patients with CKD stages 3-4 (directly related or not to obesity) and both the metabolic/renal outcomes post-BS. A total of 57 individuals were included (n = 19 for CKD-group; n = 38 for patients with obesity, but normal eGFR [control-group]). Weight loss and obesity comorbidities resolution after BS were similar in both groups. Renal function (eGFR [CKD-EPI]) improved significantly at the 1-year follow-up: Δ10.2 (5.2-14.9) (p < 0.001) for CKD-group and Δ4.0 (-3.9-9.0) mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.043) for controls. Although this improvement tended to decrease in the 5-year follow-up, eGFR remained above its basal value for the CKD-group. Noteworthy, eGFR also improved in those patients who presented CKD not directly attributed to obesity. For patients with CKD, BS appears to be safe and effective regarding weight loss and obesity comorbidities resolution, irrespective of the main cause of CKD (related or not to obesity).

A225 Effectiveness of Early Preoperative Weight Loss as a Predictor of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients along the Texas-Mexico Border

A225 Effectiveness of Early Preoperative Weight Loss as a Predictor of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients along the Texas-Mexico Border

Mucosal and hormonal adaptations after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature review regarding the relevant hormonal and histologic changes observed after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We aimed to describe the relevant hormonal (glucagon-like peptides 1 and 2 [GLP-1 and GLP-2], peptide YY [PYY], oxyntomodulin [OXM], bile acids [BA], cholecystokinin [CCK], ghrelin, glucagon, gastric inhibitory polypeptide [GIP], and amylin) profiles, as well as the histologic (mucosal cellular) adaptations happening after patients undergo RYGB. Our review compiles the current evidence and furthers the understanding of the rationale behind the food intake regulatory adaptations occurring after RYGB surgery. We identify gaps in the literature where the potential for future investigations and therapeutics may lie. We performed a comprehensive database search without language restrictions looking for RYGB bariatric surgery outcomes in patients with pre- and postoperative blood work hormonal profiling and/or gut mucosal biopsies. We gathered the relevant study results and describe them in this review. Where human findings were lacking, we included animal model studies. The amalgamation of physiologic, metabolic, and cellular adaptations following RYGB is yet to be fully characterized. This constitutes a fundamental aspiration for enhancing and individualizing obesity therapy.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Kidney Transplantation.

Obesity and kidney transplantation (KTx) are closely related. Obesity increases the risk of chronic kidney disease and can be a relative contraindication for KTx. Besides, KTx recipients are predisposed to obesity and its comorbidities. Consequently, bariatric surgery (BS) emerges as a powerful therapeutic tool either before or after KTx. Since evidence regarding the best approach is still scarce, we aimed to describe renal and metabolic outcomes in a single centre with more than 15-year experience in both surgeries. Methods: A retrospective study including patients who had received a KTx either before or after BS. Usual metabolic and renal outcomes, but also new variables (as renal graft dysfunction) were collected for a minimum follow-up of 1-year post-BS. Results: A total of 11 patients were included: n = 6 (BS-post-KTx) and n = 5 (BS-pre-KTx). One patient was assessed in both groups. No differences in the main outcomes were identified, but BS-post-KTx group tended to gain more weight during the follow-up. The incidence of renal graft dysfunction was comparable (4/6 for BS-post-KTx, 3/5 for BS-pre-KTx) between groups. Conclusions: BS in patients with KTx appears to be safe and effective attending to metabolic and renal outcomes. These results seem irrespective of the time course, except for weight regain, which appears to be a common pattern in the BS-post-KTx group.

Zinc-alpha 2-glycoprotein is associated with metabolic features and bariatric surgery outcomes in patients with morbid obesity

Background and Aims : Zinc-alpha 2-glycoprotein (ZAG) is an adipokine involved in the regulation of adipose tissue metabolism with potential implications in the pathophysiology of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Our aim was to evaluate the association between ZAG expression and different metabolic parameters in subjects with morbid obesity, as well as its role in bariatric surgery outcomes.

A068 Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Bipolar or Schizoaffective Disorders

A068 Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Bipolar or Schizoaffective Disorders

Evaluation of Adipose Tissue Zinc-Alpha 2-Glycoprotein Gene Expression and Its Relationship with Metabolic Status and Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Class III Obesity.

Zinc-α2 glycoprotein (ZAG) is an adipokine involved in adipocyte metabolism with potential implications in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) ZAG expression and metabolic parameters in patients with class III obesity, along with the impact of basal ZAG expression on short- and medium-term outcomes related to bariatric surgery. 41 patients with class III obesity who underwent bariatric surgery were included in this study. ZAG gene expression was quantified in SAT and VAT. Patients were classified into two groups according to SAT and VAT ZAG percentile. Anthropometric and biochemical variables were obtained before and 15 days, 45 days, and 1 year after surgery. The lower basal SAT ZAG expression percentile was associated with higher weight and waist circumference, while the lower basal VAT ZAG expression percentile was associated with higher weight, waist circumference, insulin, insulin resistance, and the presence of metabolic syndrome. Basal SAT ZAG expression was inversely related to weight loss at 45 days after surgery, whereas no associations were found between basal VAT ZAG expression and weight loss after surgery. Additionally, a negative association was observed between basal SAT and VAT ZAG expression and the decrease of gamma-glutamyl transferase after bariatric surgery. Therefore, lower SAT and VAT ZAG expression levels were associated with an adverse metabolic profile. However, this fact did not seem to confer worse bariatric surgery-related outcomes. Further research is needed to assess the clinical significance of the role of ZAG expression levels in the dynamics of hepatic enzymes after bariatric surgery.

Risks and Rewards of Bariatric Surgery in Advanced Chronic Liver Diseases.

The burden of obesity and metabolic syndrome has determined a sharp increase in bariatric surgery (BS) procedures, which lead to marked weight loss, improved metabolic syndrome, reduced cardiovascular risk, and even improvement in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Despite these promising results, BS in patients with chronic liver disease can rarely lead to worsening of liver function, progression to cirrhosis and its complications, and even liver transplantation. On the other hand, since obesity in patients with cirrhosis is a major cofactor for progression to a decompensated stage of the disease and a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, BS has been used to achieve weight loss in this population. In this review, we critically analyze the existing data on outcomes of BS in patients with cirrhosis and the possible mechanisms leading to fibrosis progression and worsening liver function in patients undergoing BS. Finally, we propose a set of measures that could be taken to improve the multidisciplinary management of liver disease in patients undergoing BS, including early recognition of malnutrition and alcohol misuse.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Previous Organ Transplant: Scoping Review and Analysis of the MBSAQIP.

Obesity is a major risk factor for transplant. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) offers transplant patient benefits including improved comorbidities, graft function, and longevity. We completed a scoping review and analyzed the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to determine the risk-benefit profile of LBS after transplant. We also compared laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) following transplant. Univariate analysis determined between group differences with subgroup analysis comparing LSG versus LRYGB in transplant patients. Multivariable analysis assessed whether prior transplant was independently associated with major complications or mortality. A total of 469 (0.1%) patients had previous transplant and had more comorbidities and more often underwent LSG. Operative time (93.9min vs 83min, p < 0.001) and length of stay were longer. Major complications were threefold higher in patients with a transplant history (9.6% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001. Previous transplant was the second greatest independent predictor for major complication (OR 2.14 [1.54-2.98], p = < 0.001) but was not predictive of death (OR 1.06 [0.14-8.13] p = 0.956). Amongst transplant patients, LRYGB demonstrated higher rates of leak (n = 1), VTE, AKI, unplanned intubation, and readmission. The 30-day complication rate from LBS is three times higher amongst patients with a transplant. LSG is likely the best surgical approach. Despite risks, post-transplant patients incur important benefits from LBS. Surgeons must be aware of this risk-benefit profile when determining LBS candidacy.

Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis: Careful Patient and Surgery-Type Selection Is Key to Improving Outcomes.

Previous reports suggest an increased mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS). With advancements in management of BS, we aim to study the trends, outcomes, and their predictors in patients with cirrhosis undergoing BS. A retrospective study was performed using the National Database from 2008 to 2013. Outcomes of BS in patients with cirrhosis were studied. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost of care were compared between patients with no cirrhosis (NC), compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to study the predictors of mortality. Of the 558,017 admissions of patients who underwent BS during the study period, 3086 (0.55%) had CC and 103 (0.02%) had DC. An upward trend of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) utilization was seen during the study period. On multivariate analysis, mortality in CC was comparable with those in NC (aOR 1.88; CI 0.65-5.46); however, it was higher in DC (aOR 83.8; CI 19.3-363.8). Other predictors of mortality were older age (aOR 1.06; CI 1.04-1.08), male (aOR 2.59; CI 1.76-3.81), Medicare insurance (aOR 1.93; CI 1.24-3.01), lower income (aORs 0.44 to 0.55 for 2nd to 4th income quartile vs. 1st quartile), > 3 Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (aOR 5.30; CI 3.45-8.15), undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as opposed to VSG (aOR 3.90; CI 1.79-8.48), and centers performing < 50 BS per year (aOR 5.25; CI 3.38-8.15). Length of stay and hospital cost were also significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis as compared with those with NC. Patients with compensated cirrhosis can be considered for bariatric surgery. However, careful selection of patients, procedure type, and volume of surgical center is integral in improving outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients with cirrhosis undergoing BS.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Prior Solid Organ Transplantation: an MBSAQIP Analysis.

IntroductionObesity is a risk factor for poor patient outcomes after organ transplantation (TXP). While metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is safe and effective in treating severe obesity, the role of MBS in transplant patients continues to evolve.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients in the 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database. Propensity and case-control matching, and multivariable logistic regression were performed for 30-day post-operative outcomes.ResultsA total of 336 transplant patients were compared with 157,413 patients without transplant. Propensity and case-control matching reveal no significant differences in mortality (p > 0.2). However, case-control matching revealed longer operative time (104 min versus 76 min, p < 0.001), increased length of stay (2 days versus 1 day, p < 0.05), perioperative transfusions (2% versus 0.22%, p = 0.009), and leak rates (2.2% versus 0.55%, p = 0.02) in the transplant cohort. On multivariable regression analysis, prior transplantation was associated with higher rates of overall (OR 1.6, p = 0.007) and bariatric-related morbidity (OR 1.78, p = 0.004), leak (OR 3.47, p = 0.0027), and surgical site infection (OR 3.32, p = 0.004). Prior transplantation did not predict overall (p = 0.55) nor bariatric-related mortality (p = 0.99).ConclusionMBS in prior solid organ transplantation patients is overall safe, but is associated with increased operative time and length of stay, as well as higher rates of some post-operative morbidity.

Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Chronic Liver Disease: a National Inpatient Sample Analysis

Obesity is a challenging condition to treat in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with CLD is not well established. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of BS in patients with CLD. Data from the National Inpatient Sample for 2012-2015, accounting for over 7 million discharges, were analyzed. All patients undergoing BS were identified using ICD-9/CPT codes. Patients were then stratified based on the presence of CLD using ICD-9 codes. Primary outcomes included inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges (THC). Secondary outcomes, including infection, bleeding, improper wound healing, and surgical revision, were identified using ICD-9 codes. A total of 302,306 patients underwent BS, of which 20,095 (6.6%) were diagnosed with CLD. CLD patients had greater inpatient mortality, with adjusted odds ratio of 1.47 (95% CI 1.24-1.73). CLD patients also had greater THC but shorter LOS. CLD patients had significantly less surgical revision, improper wound healing, and postoperative infection. There was no difference in bleeding complications between groups. Inpatient mortality following BS in CLD patients is low; however, there was an increased risk compared with the non-CLD population. Postoperative complications were no different or even less frequent in CLD patients compared with the general population. BS should not be discounted as a treatment option for obesity in patients with CLD.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single Institution Experience

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single Institution Experience

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients on Preoperative Therapeutic Anticoagulation: an Analysis of the 2015 to 2017 MBSAQIP.

Obesity has been found to be an independent predictor of adverse cardiac and pulmonary embolic events. As the popularity of bariatric surgery grows, surgeons are encountering more patients taking therapeutic anticoagulation medications preoperatively. This study aims to assess the safety of bariatric surgery on these patients. Data was extracted from 2015 to 2017 using the MBSAQIP database. Included patients were those who underwent a primary LSG or LRYGB. A multivariable regression analysis was performed looking at 30-day outcomes for pre-operatively anticoagulated patients. A secondary propensity-matched analysis was performed comparing outcomes among patients undergoing LSG vs LRYGB. A total of 430,396 patients were analyzed, 11,013 (2.56%) of which were taking anticoagulation medications pre-operatively. Absolute 30-day complication rates (8.73% vs 3.36%, p < 0.001), bleed rates (3.78% vs 0.88%, p < 0.001), leak rates (0.55% vs 0.41%, p = 0.021), cardiac event rates (0.43% vs 0.06%, p < 0.001), and venous thromboembolism rates (0.68% vs 0.25%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher among pre-operatively anticoagulated patients. On multivariable analysis, pre-operative anticoagulation was found to be an independent predictor of postoperative bleeding (OR 2.76, CI 2.43-3.14, p < 0.001) and mortality (OR 2.08, CI 1.49-2.90, p < 0.001). The LRYGB was associated with a significantly higher complication rate compared to the LSG (13.27% vs 7.40%, p < 0.001) in the propensity-matched cohorts. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery on anticoagulation medications pre-operatively are at a significantly higher risk of adverse outcomes post-operatively. Patients who require long-term anticoagulation should undergo careful consideration before proceeding with bariatric surgery.

Mo1621 – Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Oxygen Dependency: An Analysis of the Mbsaqip

Mo1621 – Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Oxygen Dependency: An Analysis of the Mbsaqip

136 – Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients Requiring Anticoagulation: An Analysis of the Mbsaqip

136 – Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients Requiring Anticoagulation: An Analysis of the Mbsaqip