Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification Research Articles

The Staging of Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Romania. A National Multicentric Study.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant public health issue, with an increasing incidence and prevalence and a high incidence-to-mortality ratio. The prognosis of HCC depends on two competing factors, tumor burden and underlying liver disease severity, encompassed in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification. To assess HCC staging and the way staging affects eligibility for treatment at the time of the first diagnosis in Romania in the setting of opportunistic diagnosis, in the absence of a national HCC screening policy. Data regarding HCC staging, underlying liver disease, and eligibility for treatment at the time of diagnosis was analyzed using a prospectively maintained multicentric database, which included patients from the five largest tertiary care hepatology units in the country between June 2016 and February 2020. A consecutive series of 477 patients was included. The distribution within BCLC classes was as follows: very early (0) 7.1%, early (A) 34.3%, intermediate (B) 19.4%, advanced (C) 14.2%, terminal (D) 24.7%. At the time of the diagnosis, 198 (41.5%) were eligible for a curative intent treatment, while 359 (75.2%) were eligible for a disease-modifying therapy. 228 patients (47.8%) had decompensated liver disease at the time of diagnosis, the most common decompensating event being ascites (78.1%). A large proportion of HCC cases are diagnosed at the time of a decompensating event, severely restricting the therapeutic potential. Proactive diagnostic strategies should be implemented to improve the rate of actionable diagnosis.

Dual-tracer PET/CT in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background & AimsCombined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 11C-acetate (dual-tracer) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is being increasingly performed for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although its role is not well defined. Therefore, we evaluated its effectiveness in (i) staging, (ii) characterization of indeterminate lesions on conventional imaging, and (iii) detection of HCC in patients with unexplained elevations in serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. MethodsWe retrospectively assessed 525 consecutive patients from three tertiary centers between 2014 and 2020. For staging, we recorded new lesion detection rates, changes in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, and treatment allocation due to dual-tracer PET-CT. To characterize indeterminate lesions and unexplained elevation of serum AFP levels, the sensitivity and specificity of dual-tracer PET-CT in diagnosing HCC were evaluated. A Multidisciplinary external review and a cost-benefit analysis of patients for metastatic screening were also performed. ResultsDual-tracer PET/CT identified new lesions in 14.3% of 273 staging patients, resulting in BCLC upstaging in 11.7% and treatment modifications in 7.7%. It upstaged 8.1% of 260 patients undergoing metastatic screening, with an estimated savings of US$495 per patient. It had a sensitivity and specificity of 80.7% (95% CI 71.2-88.6%) and 94.8% (95% CI 90.4-98.6%), respectively, for diagnosing HCC in 201 indeterminate lesions. It detected HCC in 45.1% of 51 patients with unexplained elevations in serum AFP concentrations. External review revealed substantial agreement between local and external image interpretation and patient assessment (n=273, κ=0.822; 95% CI 0.803-0.864). ConclusionsDual-tracer PET/CT provides additional value to conventional imaging in HCC patients by improving staging, confirming HCC diagnosis with high accuracy in patients with indeterminate lesions, and detecting HCC in patients with unexplained elevation of serum AFP.• Impact and implications• Dual-tracer PET-CT detected 12% more disease in HCC patients undergoing staging than CT or MRI, resulting in change in treatment in 8% of cases and a cost saving of US$495 per patient.• It is also able to accurately detect HCC in high-risk cases where CT or MRI are equivocal or normal.• Dual-tracer PET/CT provides additional value to conventional imaging in HCC patients by improving staging, confirming HCC diagnosis with high accuracy in patients with indeterminate lesions, and detecting HCC in patients with unexplained elevation of serum AFP.

Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have rarely been evaluated and it is unknown which factors are related to efficacy. To evaluate the efficacy and independent predictive factors of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable HCC. This study retrospectively enrolled patients with unresectable HCC who received TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment between March 2019 and April 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated in accordance with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Additionally, the prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome were assessed. One hundred and two patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 12.63 months. The median OS was 26.43 months (95%CI: 17.00-35.87), and the median PFS was 10.07 months (95%CI: 8.50-11.65). The ORR and DCR were 61.76% and 81.37%, respectively. The patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) B stage, early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) response (decrease), or early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response (decrease > 20%) had superior OS and PFS than their counterparts. This study showed that TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy in patients with unresectable HCC. The patients with BCLC B-stage disease with early NLR response (decrease) and early AFP response (decrease > 20%) may achieve better clinical outcomes with this triple therapy.

Prognostic Factors for Mortality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Diagnosis: Development of a Predictive Model Using Artificial Intelligence.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75% of primary liver tumors. Controlling risk factors associated with its development and implementing screenings in risk populations does not seem sufficient to improve the prognosis of these patients at diagnosis. The development of a predictive prognostic model for mortality at the diagnosis of HCC is proposed. In this retrospective multicenter study, the analysis of data from 191 HCC patients was conducted using machine learning (ML) techniques to analyze the prognostic factors of mortality that are significant at the time of diagnosis. Clinical and analytical data of interest in patients with HCC were gathered. Meeting Milan criteria, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification and albumin levels were the variables with the greatest impact on the prognosis of HCC patients. The ML algorithm that achieved the best results was random forest (RF). The development of a predictive prognostic model at the diagnosis is a valuable tool for patients with HCC and for application in clinical practice. RF is useful and reliable in the analysis of prognostic factors in the diagnosis of HCC. The search for new prognostic factors is still necessary in patients with HCC.

Demographic, Clinical and Treatment Characteristics of Patients with Hepatocellular Cancer: 10 Years of Experience of a Single Center

Primary cancers of the liver are in the 3rd place in cancer-related deaths. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for approximately 80% of primary hepatic malignancies. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification divides HCC into 5 stages and allocates treatments. The aim of this study is to examine the initial treatments of HCC patients in our center and compare them with the approaches in the guidelines. The data of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2006 and 2016 were recruited retrospectively. Age, gender, etiology, Child-Pugh score, BCLC stage, model for end-stage liver disease score, alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor characteristics, type of first treatment and survival time were evaluated. There were 228 men and 33 women. The mean age was 61±10.5. Of the 130 patients 77 were found on BCLC stage C. The first treatment according to BCLC stage were sorafenib in 22, resection in 16, TACE in 15, Ytrium-90 in 14, systemic chemotherapy other than sorafenib in 14, transplantation in 11, palliative treatment in 8, and ablation in 4 patients. The median survival time was 11.9 (8.1-15.9) months. One-year survival was 32%, three-year survival was 19%, and five-year survival was 16%. The management of HCC patients was performed according to more than just BCLC guidelines in our center. The high number of patients who did not receive treatment may indicate that we need to show sufficient clinical attention to Stage D patients.

The Complexity of the Tumor Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Emerging Therapeutic Developments

This review explores various aspects of the HCC TME, including both cellular and non-cellular components, to elucidate their roles in tumor development and progression. Specifically, it highlights the significance of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and their contributions to tumor progression, angiogenesis, immune suppression, and therapeutic resistance. Moreover, this review emphasizes the role of immune cells, such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T-cells (Tregs), in shaping the immunosuppressive microenvironment that promotes tumor growth and immune evasion. Furthermore, we also focused only on the non-cellular components of the HCC TME, including the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the role of hypoxia-induced angiogenesis. Alterations in the composition of ECM and stiffness have been implicated in tumor invasion and metastasis, while hypoxia-driven angiogenesis promotes tumor growth and metastatic spread. The molecular mechanisms underlying these processes, including the activation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling, are also discussed. In addition to elucidating the complex TME of HCC, this review focuses on emerging therapeutic strategies that target the TME. It highlights the potential of second-line treatments, such as regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab, in improving overall survival for advanced HCC patients who have progressed on or were intolerant to first-line therapy. Furthermore, this review explores the implications of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging and classification system in guiding HCC management decisions. The BCLC system, which incorporates tumor stage, liver function, and performance status, provides a framework for treatment stratification and prognosis prediction in HCC patients. The insights gained from this review contribute to the development of novel therapeutic interventions and personalized treatment approaches for HCC patients, ultimately improving clinical outcomes in this challenging disease.

Proper position of single and large (≥5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proper position of single large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. The data were collected from the nationwide multicentre database of the Korean Liver Cancer Association. Patients with single large (≥5 cm) HCC were separated from BCLC stage A patients and designated as Group X. The remaining BCLC stage A and stage B patients were classified as Group A and Group B, respectively. The survival outcomes of propensity score-matched groups were compared. Among the 3965 randomly selected patients, the number of patients in Group X, Group A, and Group B was 414, 2787, and 760, respectively. TriMatch analysis allowed us to obtain 116 well-balanced triplets. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in Group X were worse than in Group A (91%, 71%, and 48% vs 90%, 78%, and 64%, respectively; P < .000). However, the rates were not different compared with those in Group B (91%, 71%, and 48% vs 90%, 69%, and 48%, respectively; P < .09). In multivariate analysis, Group X, Group B, age over 60 years, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, and creatinine level were independent predictors of worse overall survival. Our findings suggest that Group X should be relocated to BCLC stage B rather than BCLC stage A.

Challenges and Solutions in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has gained attention in the last few years due to its increasing prevalence worldwide becoming a global epidemic. The increasing incidence of NAFLD and the concurrent increase in the number of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases at a global level is a matter of concern. HCC has several risk factors, of which NAFLD and its associated metabolic disturbances-type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and dyslipidemia-are of great interest due to their accelerating rise in incidence worldwide. There is a high amount of data derived from basic and clinical studies that reveal the molecular pathways that drive NAFLD-associated HCC. Based on these findings, new prevention, surveillance, and treatment strategies are emerging. However, current data on treatment modalities in NAFLD-associated HCC are still scarce, though the results from non-NAFLD HCC studies are promising and could provide a basis for a future research agenda to address NAFLD/NASH patients. Clinicians should carefully assess all the clinical and radiological parameters and establish a prognosis based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification and discuss in a multidisciplinary team the treatment strategy. The specific factors associated with NAFLD-associated HCC which can have a negative impact on survival even in patients with early HCC, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, should be taken into consideration. This review aims to discuss the latest recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD-associated HCC and the remaining challenges.

T1 relaxation time analysis in predicting hepatic dysfunction and prognosis in patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization

ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of T1 mapping in predicting hepatic dysfunction and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Material and Methods100 consecutive patients with treatment-naive HCC treated with TACE were prospectively analyzed. Clinical, laboratory, and MRI parameters (liver and tumor T1 relaxation times (T1L, T1T)) before and/or following TACE were measured and calculated. Clinical parameters included the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) criteria, and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Laboratory parameters were the gold standard for hepatic dysfunction. T1L and T1T were combined by stepwise multivariate logistic regression to yield a T1-related probability index (T1com) for further analysis. Study endpoints included hepatic dysfunction and progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Results38 patients (38%) were diagnosed with hepatic dysfunction following TACE. There was no significant difference in clinical parameters between the groups with and without hepatic dysfunction. Logistic regression analysis showed that T1L and T1T were independent risk factors for assessing hepatic dysfunction. T1com showed a better AUC than T1L and T1T (0.81 vs. 0.76 and 0.69, P = 0.007 and 0.006). Patients with low T1com (≤0.42) showed a better median PFS than patients with high T1com (>0.42) (167.0 vs. 215.9 days, P = 0.010). In comparison, CTP, BCLC, and ALBI scores were not statistically significant in predicting PFS in HCC patients treated with TACE (P > 0.05). ConclusionCompared with widely used clinical parameters, T1 was more capable of predicting hepatic dysfunction after TACE. Stratification of patients with HCC undergoing TACE according to T1 may help clinicians to develop treatment strategies in preventing the occurrence of hepatic dysfunction and improving individual prognoses.

Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolisation for the treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the primary treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Although growing evidence favours liver resection (LR) over TACE for intermediate-stage HCC, the best treatment option remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) after LR versus TACE for intermediate-stage HCC. A comprehensive literature review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Studies that compared the efficacy of LR and TACE in patients with intermediate (BCLC stage B) HCC were selected. According to the recent updated BCLC classification, intermediate stage of HCC was defined as follows: (a) four or more HCC nodules of any size, or (b) two or three nodules, but if at least one tumour is larger than 3cm. The main outcome was OS, expressed as the hazard ratio. Nine eligible studies of 3355 patients were included in the review. The OS of patients who underwent LR was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent TACE (hazard ratio=0.52; 95% CI: 0.39-0.69; I2=79%). Prolonged survival following LR was confirmed after sensitivity analysis of five studies using propensity score matching (HR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.34-0.59; I2=55%). Patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent LR had a longer OS that those who underwent TACE. The role of LR in patients with BCLC stage B should be clarified in future randomised controlled trials.

Prognostic biomarkers in and selection of surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prognostic biomarkers in and selection of surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. Surgery is the treatment of choice in stages 0 and A in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. A minimally invasive technique in this scenario has the advantage of reducing postoperative pain, blood loss, and hospital stay. We present our experience and outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection in HCC. Retrospective descriptive analysis from all patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection for HCC in our center between August 2006 and December 2020. Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC was performed in 20 patients. The median age was 70 years, and the male gender was 75%. Sixteen patients had chronic liver disease, and 87.5% were Child A. The most common liver resection was the non-anatomical (45%). 30-day morbidity was 15%, without the need for reintervention. We had no 30-day mortality and postoperative liver failure. Negative margins were achieved in 90% of patients. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 25 and 40.5 months, respectively. Laparoscopic liver resection for the treatment of HCC in our series is safe, with no 30-day mortality, low incidence of complications, no postoperative liver failure, and suitable medium- and long-term oncological results.

Treatment Patterns and Survival in Patients with Intermediate, Advanced, or Terminal Stage of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in France over the Period 2015-2017: A Real-Life Study

Background. The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not eligible to curative treatment is poor. Little information is available on treatment modalities and outcomes of these patients in everyday practice. The aim of this analysis was to describe the characteristics of patients with a newly diagnosed intermediate, advanced, or terminal (IAT) stage of HCC (ICD-10: C220) between 2015 and 2017, either present at diagnosis of HCC or having occurred after disease progression; treatment patterns, HCC aetiologies, and the associated survival were determined using the nationwide claims database. Methods. Patients with HCC were identified using the ICD-10 code C220. IAT stages, defined according to the terminology used in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, were indirectly identified by the presence of at least one of the following treatments: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), HCC systemic therapy, best supportive care (BSC), or an ICD-10 code of metastatic HCC. Treatment patterns were described with an algorithm based on a ranking of palliative treatments identified. Survival was analysed by using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results. 19,649 eligible patients were identified. Their mean age was 70.5 years (SD: 11.0), and 82.5% were males. For 68.8% of patients, the IAT stage was present at HCC diagnosis. On the whole population, 5,114 patients (26.0%) were treated initially with a TACE or TARE, and 4,681 (23.8%) received a targeted systemic therapy at any moment during follow-up with sorafenib in 99.5% of cases. About 7,628 patients (45.6%) received only BSC. Survival since the diagnosis of the AIT stage of HCC differed according to the type of the first received palliative treatment. Median overall survival was 23.8, 9.6, 7.4, and 1.0 months in patients initially receiving TACE, TARE, systemic therapy, and BSC only, respectively. Conclusion. Over the period 2015-2017, hepatocellular carcinoma was still often diagnosed in France at late-stage disease with a very poor prognosis.

Pathogenesis and Current Treatment Strategies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver cancer with high lethality and low five-year survival rates leading to a substantial worldwide burden for healthcare systems. HCC initiation and progression are favored by different etiological risk factors including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, non-/and alcoholic fatty liver disease (N/AFLD), and tobacco smoking. In molecular pathogenesis, endogenous alteration in genetics (TP53, TERT, CTNNB1, etc.), epigenetics (DNA-methylation, miRNA, lncRNA, etc.), and dysregulation of key signaling pathways (Wnt/β-catenin, JAK/STAT, etc.) strongly contribute to the development of HCC. The multitude and complexity of different pathomechanisms also reflect the difficulties in tailored medical therapy of HCC. Treatment options for HCC are strictly dependent on tumor staging and liver function, which are structured by the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system. Surgical resection, local ablative techniques, and liver transplantation are valid and curative therapeutic options for early tumor stages. For multifocal and metastatic diseases, systemic therapy is recommended. While Sorafenib had been the standalone HCC first-line therapy for decades, recent developments had led to the approval of new treatment options as first-line as well as second-line treatment. Anti-PD-L1 directed combination therapies either with anti-VEGF directed agents or with anti-CTLA-4 active substances have been implemented as the new treatment standard in the first-line setting. However, data from clinical trials indicate different responses on specific therapeutic regimens depending on the underlying pathogenesis of hepatocellular cancer. Therefore, histopathological examinations have been re-emphasized by current international clinical guidelines in addition to the standardized radiological diagnosis using contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. In this review, we emphasize the current knowledge on molecular pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. On this occasion, the treatment sequences for early and advanced tumor stages according to the recently updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system and the current algorithm of systemic therapy (first-, second-, and third-line treatment) are summarized. Furthermore, we discuss novel precautional and pre-therapeutic approaches including therapeutic vaccination, adoptive cell transfer, locoregional therapy enhancement, and non-coding RNA-based therapy as promising treatment options. These novel treatments may prolong overall survival rates in regard with quality of life and liver function as mainstay of HCC therapy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of Hi-ART vs. Radixact.

Helical tomotherapy (HT), a unique rotational dose delivery machine, has been updated from Hi-ART to Radixact. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using HT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared the dosimetric details of Hi-ART and Radixact. Between April 2014 and November 2020, 28 patients with HCC were treated with SBRT using HT for a cure at Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, 9 patients had stage 0 disease, 12 had stage A, 4 had stage B, and 3 had stage C. The tumor size ranged from 1 cm to 8 cm (median, 2 cm). The SBRT dose ranged from 40 to 60 Gy (median, 48 Gy) with 4 fractions. Twenty-three patients were treated with Hi-ART and 5 patients were treated with Radixact. To compare the dosimetric parameters between Hi-ART and Radixact, we created treatment plans with the same constraints, pitch, modulation factor, and field width for the same patient in pairs. The median follow-up time from the date of SBRT administration was 24 months (range, 3-67 months). The local failure-free survival and intrahepatic failure-free survival rates were 96% and 58% at 1 year, 84% and 36% at 2 years, and 76% and 18% at 3 years, respectively. The overall survival rate was 93% at 1 year, 93% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years, respectively. When the paired treatment plans were reviewed, the beam-on time and intermediate dose-spillage were found to be significantly reduced in Radixact than Hi-ART (P<0.001). With regard to normal organ sparing, the irradiated dose to the total liver, normal liver, heart, and kidney was significantly lower with Radixact (P<0.001). SBRT using HT for HCC showed favorable treatment outcomes. Radixact, the latest version, physically improved treatment efficiency by reducing treatment time and provided better organ sparing than Hi-ART.

S1299 Can Alpha Feto Protein Level Be Used as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma?

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend staging Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) using the Barcelona-Clinic-Liver Cancer (BCLC) Classification. This staging system uses a set of criteria to stratify patients to guide their management. Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score and alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were recently added to the BCLC classification. Tumor size is one of the main prognostic factors associated with all-cause mortality and recurrence after treatment. Tumor size < /= 3cm is a vital cutoff to define treatment and > 5 years survival. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between the AFP levels and tumor size at diagnosis in patients with HCC and their prognosis. Methods: A retrospective study was performed for all patients diagnosed with HCC at Liver Associates of Texas, P.A., between January 2014 to October 2021. All patients underwent laboratory testing, including AFP levels, at the time of diagnosis. The size of the mass was determined at the time of diagnosis using imaging testing such as dynamic abdominal CT/MRI Scan. A linear regression model was used to assess the correlation between levels of AFP and tumor size at diagnosis in patients with HCC. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 231 patients were identified with HCC, of which 191 patients had information for tumor size in cm and AFP level at the time of diagnosis. The mean age was 67.8 years. The study included 191 deceased patients with an average period of survival after diagnosis of 37 months. There were 88 Caucasian, 50 Hispanic, 31 African American, 27 Asian, 4 Native American, and 31 unspecified. 72.3% were female. AFP level at the time of diagnosis was found to have a statically significant (p = 0.001) positive correlation of 0.0025 (95% CI: 0.001 to 0.004). For the cutoff value of tumor size > 3 cm, a two-sample t-test was executed and a significant difference was noted in AFP level between the two groups (p = 0.012). Patients with tumor size < 3 cm had an average AFP level of 111. 53 (SD = 246.05), and patients with tumor size > 3 cm had an average AFP level of 323.60 (SD = 443.94). Conclusion: The positive correlation between AFP with tumor size at diagnosis suggests its potential as a prognostic tool for patients with HCC. Given that there is a positive correlation between AFP with tumor size, and tumor size above > 3cm reduces survival, further studies are necessary to validate these results.Figure 1.: AFP is correlated with tumor size. AFP levels were positively correlated with size of mass in patients with HCC

New concepts in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer‐related death and occurs mainly in the context of chronic liver disease at cirrhosis stage. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, first established in 1999, is the most commonly used staging system for HCC in Western countries that link tumor burden, liver function and performance status with prognosis and therapeutic management. Since the first publication of this classification, it has been implemented in several clinical guidelines and recent major therapeutic advances in the management of HCC have modified the therapeutic landscape of HCC. Accordingly, an updated version was recently published in 2022, incorporating an expert clinical decision‐making component and the concept of treatment stage migration. This update also introduces the positive results of recent randomized clinical trials, and introduces atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) as a first‐line combination regimen for patients with advanced HCC. Finally, the complexity of the management of patients with HCC highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach including input from hepatology, surgery, radiology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology.

Role of interventional oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma: Future best practice beyond current guidelines.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Liver transplant remains the goal of curative treatment, but limited supply of organs decreases accessibility and prolongs waiting time to transplantation. Therefore, interventional oncology therapies have been used to treat the majority of HCC patients, including those awaiting transplant. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification is the most widely used staging system in management of HCC that helps allocate treatments. Since its inception in 1999, it was updated for the fifth time in November 2021 and for the first time shaped by expert opinions outside the core BCLC group. The most recent version includes additional options for early-stage disease, substratifies intermediate disease into three groups, and lists alternates to Sorafenib that can double the expected survival of advanced-stage disease. The group also proposed a new BCLC staging schema for disease progression, and endorsed treatment stage migration (TSM) directly into the main staging and treatment algorithm. This article reviews the recent developments underlying the current BCLC guidelines and highlights ongoing research, particularly involving radioembolization, that will shape future best practice.

ALBI grade for outcome prediction in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial radioembolization

Introduction and aimDiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often occurs when the disease is unresectable and therapeutic options are limited. The extent of disease and liver function according to Child-Pugh (C-P) classification are the main prognostic factors guiding clinicians in the management of HCC. The integration of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade is emerging to assess liver function on account of its objectivity and reproducibility. Our aim was to investigate the value of the ALBI grade in predicting the outcome in patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients with advanced and unresectable HCC treated with TARE in our institution. All patients underwent a preliminary dosimetric study before Yttrium-90 resin microsphere TARE. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), C-P, and ALBI scores were established at the time of TARE. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and survival after TARE were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival analyses were stratified according to ALBI grade, C-P, and BCLC classification. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression models determined the association between prognostic factors and clinical outcomes.ResultsIn total, 72 patients were included in the study, showing an OS of 51 months. The ALBI grade identified groups of patients with different prognoses both in the whole cohort and within the C-P classes, especially between ALBI 1 and ALBI 2. This result is confirmed also within BCLC classes. In treatment naïve patients, the ALBI grade was not able to predict outcomes, whereas the presence and degree of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) significantly affected prognosis.ConclusionsThe ALBI grade provided a more accurate prognostic stratification than the C-P classification in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC treated with TARE. However, the outcome of HCC is affected not only by liver function but also by disease-related characteristics, such as disease burden and degree of PVT. Including the ALBI grade in clinical guidelines may improve the management of patients affected by HCC.

Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Albanian Experience.

Liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide in terms of the number of cases (626,000 or 5.7% of new cancer cases) but due to the very poor prognosis, the number of deaths is nearly similar (598,000). The survival rate is 3% to 5% in cancer registries for the United States and developing countries. The modality of treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients depends on the stage of the disease. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) is the favorite staging system. There are many patients who initially present with the intermediate-stage disease, and in this setting transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the treatment of choice.&#x0D; The purpose of this article is to highlight and discuss the role of chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, including the results of recent large studies, and the concept of combined therapies, illustrating our case.&#x0D; The differences in individual factors that are not captured by the BCLC framework, such as the tumor growth pattern, degree of hypervascularity, and vascular supply, complicate the further evaluation of these patients. Because of these differences, not all patients benefit equally from TACE. Several tools have been devised to aid the decision-making process which have shown promising initial results but have failed external evaluation and have not been translated to the clinical aspects. Criteria for treatment decisions in daily clinical practice are needed in all stages of the disease.&#x0D; Conclusion: TACE is a safe method for prolonging patients' survival with unresectable HCC. The correct treatment of HCC is concentrated in cancer centers, and cooperation between multiple specialists is necessary.