Barbed Ends Of Actin Filaments Research Articles

Probing the ligand binding specificity of FNBP4 WW domains and interaction with FH1 domain of FMN1

Formins are a group of actin-binding proteins that mediate nascent actin filament polymerization, filament elongation, and barbed end-capping function, thereby regulating different cellular and developmental processes. Developmental processes like vertebrate gastrulation, neural growth cone dynamics, and limb development require formins functioning in a regulated manner. Formin-binding proteins like Rho GTPase regulate the activation of auto-inhibited conformation of diaphanous formins. Unlike other diaphanous formins, Formin1 (FMN1) a non-diaphanous formin is not regulated by Rho GTPase. FMN1 acts as an antagonist of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling pathway during limb development. Several previous reports demonstrated that WW domain-containing proteins can interact with poly-proline-rich amino acid stretches of formins and play a crucial role in developmental processes. In contrast, WW domain-containing Formin-binding Protein 4 (FNBP4) protein plays an essential role in limb development. It has been hypothesized that the interaction between FNBP4 and FMN1 can further attribute to the role in limb development through the BMP signaling pathway. In this study, we have elucidated the binding kinetics of FNBP4 and FMN1 using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Our findings confirm that the FNBP4 exhibits interaction with the poly-proline-rich formin homology 1 (FH1) domain of FMN1. Furthermore, only the first WW1 domains are involved in the interaction between the two domains. Thus, this study sheds light on the binding potentialities of WW domains of FNBP4 that might contribute to the regulation of FMN1 function.

Mechanism of actin capping protein recruitment and turnover during clathrin-mediated endocytosis.

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis depends on polymerization of a branched actin network to provide force for membrane invagination. A key regulator in branched actin network formation is actin capping protein (CP), which binds to the barbed end of actin filaments to prevent the addition or loss of actin subunits. CP was thought to stochastically bind actin filaments, but recent evidence shows CP is regulated by a group of proteins containing CP-interacting (CPI) motifs. Importantly, how CPI motif proteins function together to regulate CP is poorly understood. Here, we show Aim21 and Bsp1 work synergistically to recruit CP to the endocytic actin network in budding yeast through their CPI motifs, which also allosterically modulate capping strength. In contrast, twinfilin works downstream of CP recruitment, regulating the turnover of CP through its CPI motif and a non-allosteric mechanism. Collectively, our findings reveal how three CPI motif proteins work together to regulate CP in a stepwise fashion during endocytosis.

Gelsolin from mussel's catch muscle

Proteins of the gelsolin family are Ca2+-dependent, multifunctional, actin-binding proteins containing three (S1–S3, about 40 kDa) or six (S1–S6, about 80 kDa) highly conserved repeats in the amino acid sequence. The pattern of interaction of these proteins with actin is complex: they can sever actin filaments; promote polymer nucleation after binding to two actin monomers; and cap the growing barbed end of actin filaments. In the present study, an actin polymerizing factor (46 kDa) from the adductor muscle of a bivalve mollusc has been discovered and identified for the first time. This protein has turned out to belong to the gelsolin family of actin regulatory proteins. The expression of gelsolin-like proteins in the tissues of bivalves was predicted after analyzing their proteome, but this is the first study where an actually expressed protein has been found. A primary determination of its physicochemical properties such as molecular weight, charge, resistance to urea, influence on actin polymerization by viscosity, and light scattering is carried out and the molecular structure analyzed.

Cyclase-associated protein interacts with actin filament barbed ends to promote depolymerization and formin displacement

Cyclase-associated protein (CAP) has emerged as a central player in cellular actin turnover, but its molecular mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood. Recent studies revealed that the N terminus of CAP interacts with the pointed ends of actin filaments to accelerate depolymerization in conjunction with cofilin. Here, we use invitro microfluidics-assisted TIRF microscopy to show that the C terminus of CAP promotes depolymerization at the opposite (barbed) ends of actin filaments. In the absence of actin monomers, full-length mouse CAP1 and C-terminal halves of CAP1 (C-CAP1) and CAP2 (C-CAP2) accelerate barbed end depolymerization. Using mutagenesis and structural modeling, we show that these activities are mediated by the WH2 and CARP domains of CAP. In addition, we observe that CAP collaborates with profilin to accelerate barbed end depolymerization and that these effects depend on their direct interaction, providing the first known example of CAP-profilin collaborative effects in regulating actin. In the presence of actin monomers, CAP1 attenuates barbed end growth and promotes formin dissociation. Overall, these findings demonstrate that CAP uses distinct domains and mechanisms to interact with opposite ends of actin filaments and drive turnover. Further, they contribute to the emerging view of actin barbed ends as sites of dynamic molecular regulation, where numerous proteins compete and cooperate with each other to tune polymer dynamics, similar to the rich complexity seen at microtubule ends.

A-Band assembly in avian skeletal muscles observed with super-resolution microscopy.

Myofibrils in vertebrate skeletal muscle are organized in aligned arrays of filaments formed from multiple protein components. Despite considerable information describing individual proteins, how they assemble de novo into mature myofibrils is still a challenge. Studies in our lab of sarcomeric protein localization during myofibril assembly led us to propose a three-step progression: premyofibrils to nascent myofibrils, culminating in mature myofibrils. Premyofibrils, forming at the spreading edges of muscle cells, are composed of minisarcomeres containing small bands of non-muscle myosin II filaments alternating with muscle-specific α-actinin Z-Bodies attached to barbed ends of actin filaments, establishing bipolar F-actin arrangements in sarcomeres. Assembly of nascent myofibrils occurs with addition of muscle-specific myosin II, F-actin, titin, and the alignment of Z-Bodies in adjacent fibrils to form beaded Z-Bands. Muscle-specific myosin II filaments in nascent myofibrils appear in an overlapping arrangement when viewed with wide-field and confocal microscopes. In mature myofibrils, non-muscle myosin II is absent, and M-Band proteins localize to the muscle myosin II filaments, aiding their alignment by cross-linking them into A-Bands. Super-resolution microscopy (SIM and STED) revealed muscle myosin II in mini-A-Bands in nascent myofibrils. In contrast to previous reports that vertebrate muscle myosin thick filaments form at their final 1.6 μm lengths, mini-A-Bands are first detected at a length of about 0.4 μm, and gradually increase four-fold in length to 1.6 μm in mature myofibrils. These new discoveries in avian skeletal muscle cells share a common characteristic with invertebrate muscles where some A-Bands can grow to lengths reaching 25 μm.

Molecular mechanisms of inorganic-phosphate release from the core and barbed end of actin filaments.

The release of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from actin filaments constitutes a key step in their regulated turnover, which is fundamental to many cellular functions. The mechanisms underlying Pi release from the core and barbed end of actin filaments remain unclear. Here, using human and bovine actin isoforms, we combine cryo-EM with molecular-dynamics simulations and in vitro reconstitution to demonstrate how actin releases Pi through a 'molecular backdoor'. While constantly open at the barbed end, the backdoor is predominantly closed in filament-core subunits and opens only transiently through concerted amino acid rearrangements. This explains why Pi escapes rapidly from the filament end but slowly from internal subunits. In a nemaline-myopathy-associated actin variant, the backdoor is predominantly open in filament-core subunits, resulting in accelerated Pi release and filaments with drastically shortened ADP-Pi caps. Our results provide the molecular basis for Pi release from actin and exemplify how a disease-linked mutation distorts the nucleotide-state distribution and atomic structure of the filament.

The intrinsically disordered cytoplasmic tail of a dendrite branching receptor uses two distinct mechanisms to regulate the actin cytoskeleton.

Dendrite morphogenesis is essential for neural circuit formation, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying complex dendrite branching remain elusive. Previous studies on the highly branched Caenorhabditis elegans PVD sensory neuron identified a membrane co-receptor complex that links extracellular signals to intracellular actin remodeling machinery, promoting high-order dendrite branching. In this complex, the claudin-like transmembrane protein HPO-30 recruits the WAVE regulatory complex (WRC) to dendrite branching sites, stimulating the Arp2/3 complex to polymerize actin. We report here our biochemical and structural analysis of this interaction, revealing that the intracellular domain (ICD) of HPO-30 is intrinsically disordered and employs two distinct mechanisms to regulate the actin cytoskeleton. First, HPO-30 ICD binding to the WRC requires dimerization and involves the entire ICD sequence, rather than a short linear peptide motif. This interaction enhances WRC activation by the GTPase Rac1. Second, HPO-30 ICD directly binds to the sides and barbed end of actin filaments. Binding to the barbed end requires ICD dimerization and inhibits both actin polymerization and depolymerization, resembling the actin capping protein CapZ. These dual functions provide an intriguing model of how membrane proteins can integrate distinct mechanisms to fine-tune local actin dynamics.

Cappin' or formin': Formin and capping protein competition for filament ends shapes actin networks.

How cells assemble distinct actin networks from shared cytoplasmic components remains an important unresolved question. In this issue, Wirshing et al. (2023. J. Cell Biol.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202209105) demonstrate how capping protein and formin competition for actin filament barbed ends controls the assembly of branched and linear actin networks.

Acetylation of fission yeast tropomyosin does not promote differential association with cognate formins.

It was proposed from cellular studies that S. pombe tropomyosin Cdc8 (Tpm) segregates into two populations due to the presence or absence of an amino-terminal acetylation that specifies which formin-mediated F-actin networks it binds, but with no supporting biochemistry. To address this mechanism in vitro, we developed methods for S. pombe actin expression in Sf9 cells. We then employed 3-color TIRF microscopy using all recombinant S. pombe proteins to probe in vitro multicomponent mechanisms involving actin, acetylated and unacetylated Tpm, formins, and myosins. Acetyl-Tpm exhibits tight binding to actin in contrast to weaker binding by unacetylated Tpm. In disagreement with the differential recruitment model, Tpm showed no preferential binding to filaments assembled by the FH1-FH2-domains of two S. pombe formins, nor did Tpm binding have any bias towards the growing formin-bound actin filament barbed end. Although our in vitro findings do not support a direct formin-tropomyosin interaction, it is possible that formins bias differential tropomyosin isoform recruitment through undiscovered mechanisms. Importantly, despite a 12% sequence divergence between skeletal and S. pombe actin, S. pombe myosins Myo2 and Myo51 exhibited similar motile behavior with these two actins, validating key prior findings with these myosins that used skeletal actin.

Evolutionary tuning of barbed end competition allows simultaneous construction of architecturally distinct actin structures.

How cells simultaneously assemble actin structures of distinct sizes, shapes, and filamentous architectures is still not well understood. Here, we used budding yeast as a model to investigate how competition for the barbed ends of actin filaments might influence this process. We found that while vertebrate capping protein (CapZ) and formins can simultaneously associate with barbed ends and catalyze each other's displacement, yeast capping protein (Cap1/2) poorly displaces both yeast and vertebrate formins. Consistent with these biochemical differences, in vivo formin-mediated actin cable assembly was strongly attenuated by the overexpression of CapZ but not Cap1/2. Multiwavelength live cell imaging further revealed that actin patches in cap2∆ cells acquire cable-like features over time, including recruitment of formins and tropomyosin. Together, our results suggest that the activities of S. cerevisiae Cap1/2 have been tuned across evolution to allow robust cable assembly by formins in the presence of high cytosolic levels of Cap1/2, which conversely limit patch growth and shield patches from formins.

Apical constriction during embryogenesis is driven by self-assembled actomyosin networks that spontaneously develop radial polarity and pulsing.

During embryogenesis, cells exert coordinated forces to sculpt tissues into complex shapes that are precursors of organs and other specialized structures. Apical constriction is a conserved deformation mode that contracts and folds tissues. In many organisms, apical constriction is driven by contractile pulses generated by apical actomyosin cellular networks (Martin and Goldstein, 2014) with radial polarity: formins and actin filament barbed ends localize to peripheral cell-cell junctions, while actin filaments point inwards with myosin II in the medial apical zone (Mason et al., 2013).

Direct observation of the conformational states of formin mDia1 at actin filament barbed ends and along the filament.

The fine regulation of actin polymerization is essential to control cell motility and architecture and to perform essential cellular functions. Formins are key regulators of actin filament assembly, known to processively elongate filament barbed ends and increase their polymerization rate. Different models have been extrapolated to describe the molecular mechanism governing the processive motion of formin FH2 domains at polymerizing barbed ends. Using negative stain electron microscopy, we directly identified for the first time two conformations of the mDia1 formin FH2 domains in interaction with the barbed ends of actin filaments. These conformations agree with the speculated open and closed conformations of the "stair-stepping" model. We observed the FH2 dimers to be in the open conformation for 79% of the data, interacting with the two terminal actin subunits of the barbed end while they interact with three actin subunits in the closed conformation. In addition, we identified and characterized the structure of single FH2 dimers encircling the core of actin filaments, and reveal their ability to spontaneously depart from barbed ends.

Actin capping protein regulates postsynaptic spine development through CPI-motif interactions.

Dendritic spines are small actin-rich protrusions essential for the formation of functional circuits in the mammalian brain. During development, spines begin as dynamic filopodia-like protrusions that are then replaced by relatively stable spines containing an expanded head. Remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in the formation and modification of spine morphology, however many of the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Capping protein (CP) is a major actin regulating protein that caps the barbed ends of actin filaments, and promotes the formation of dense branched actin networks. Knockdown of CP impairs the formation of mature spines, leading to an increase in the number of filopodia-like protrusions and defects in synaptic transmission. Here, we show that CP promotes the stabilization of dendritic protrusions, leading to the formation of stable mature spines. However, the localization and function of CP in dendritic spines requires interactions with proteins containing a capping protein interaction (CPI) motif. We found that the CPI motif-containing protein Twinfilin-1 (Twf1) also localizes to spines where it plays a role in CP spine enrichment. The knockdown of Twf1 leads to an increase in the density of filopodia-like protrusions and a decrease in the stability of dendritic protrusions, similar to CP knockdown. Finally, we show that CP directly interacts with Shank and regulates its spine accumulation. These results suggest that spatiotemporal regulation of CP in spines not only controls the actin dynamics underlying the formation of stable postsynaptic spine structures, but also plays an important role in the assembly of the postsynaptic apparatus underlying synaptic function.

Structural and Functional Analyses of the Gelsolin Homology Domains of Flightless‐I in Actin Dynamics

Flightless-I is a unique member of the gelsolin superfamily alloying six gelsolin homology domains and leucine-rich repeats. Flightless-I is an established regulator of the actin cytoskeleton, however, its biochemical activities in actin dynamics are still largely elusive. To better understand the background of the biological functioning of Flightless-I we studied the actin activities of Drosophila Flightless-I by in vitro bulk fluorescence spectroscopy and single filament fluorescence microscopy. Our work identifies the first three gelsolin homology domains (1–3) of Flightless-I as the main actin-binding site; neither the other three gelsolin homology domains (4–6) nor the leucine-rich repeats bind actin. Flightless-I inhibits polymerization by high-affinity (∼nM) filament barbed end capping, moderately facilitates nucleation by low-affinity (∼ µM) monomer binding, and does not sever actin filaments. Our work reveals that in the presence of profilin Flightless-I is only able to cap actin filament barbed ends but fails to promote actin assembly. Flightless-I was found to interact with actin and affect actin dynamics in a calcium-independent fashion in vitro, suggesting the lack of calcium-mediated activation and conformational change of protein. For the comparative structural analysis of the six gelsolin homology domains (GH16) of gelsolin and Flightless-I, we used a combination of biophysical and biochemical approaches. The use of both internal (tryptophans) and external (8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid; ANS) fluorophores revealed that calcium-binding induces structural changes in gelsolin but the conformational behavior of Flightless-I GH16 was not significantly affected by the divalent cation. Different kinetics of limited proteolysis observed for gelsolin and Flightless-I GH16 further strengthened this conclusion. Our experimental findings are supported by bioinformatics analysis predicting that the sequence elements responsible for Ca2+-activation of GSN are not conserved in Flightless-I GH16.

The dynamic instability of actin filament barbed ends.

The turnover of actin filament networks in cells has long been considered to reflect the treadmilling behavior of pure actin filaments in vitro, where only the pointed ends depolymerize. Newly discovered molecular mechanisms challenge this notion, as they provide evidence of situations in which growing and depolymerizing barbed ends coexist.

AtFH14 crosslinks actin filaments and microtubules in different manners.

In many cellular processes including cell division, the synergistic dynamics of actin filaments and microtubules play vital roles. However, the regulatory mechanisms of these synergistic dynamics are not fully understood. Proteins such as formins are involved in actin filament-microtubule interactions and Arabidopsis thaliana formin 14 (AtFH14) may function as a crosslinker between actin filaments and microtubules in cell division, but the molecular mechanism underlying such crosslinking remains unclear. Without microtubules, formin homology (FH) 1/FH2 of AtFH14 nucleated actin polymerisation from actin monomers and capped the barbed end of actin filaments. However, in the presence of microtubules, quantitative analysis showed that the binding affinity of AtFH14 FH1FH2 to microtubules was higher than that to actin filaments. Moreover, microtubule-bound AtFH14 FH1FH2 neither nucleated actin polymerisation nor inhibited barbed end elongation. In contrast, tubulin did not affect AtFH14 FH1FH2 to nucleate actin polymerisation and inhibit barbed end elongation. Nevertheless, microtubule-bound AtFH14 FH1FH2 bound actin filaments and the bound actin filaments slid and elongated along the microtubules or elongated away from the microtubules, which induced bundling or crosslinking of actin filaments and microtubules. Pharmacological analyses indicated that AtFH14 FH1FH2 promoted crosslinking of actin filaments and microtubules in vivo. Additionally, co-sedimentation and fluorescent dye-labelling experiments of AtFH14 FH2-truncated proteins in vitro revealed the essential motifs of bundling actin filaments or microtubules, which were 63-92 aa and 42-62 aa in the AtFH14 FH2 N-terminal, respectively, and 42-62 aa was the essential motif to crosslink actin filaments and microtubules. Our results aid in explaining how AtFH14 functions as a crosslinker between actin filaments and microtubules to regulate their dynamics via different manners during cell division. They also facilitate further understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the interactions between actin filaments and microtubules.

Twinfilin uncaps filament barbed ends to promote turnover of lamellipodial actin networks.

Coordinated polymerization of actin filaments provides force for cell migration, morphogenesis and endocytosis. Capping protein (CP) is a central regulator of actin dynamics in all eukaryotes. It binds to actin filament (F-actin) barbed ends with high affinity and slow dissociation kinetics to prevent filament polymerization and depolymerization. However, in cells, CP displays remarkably rapid dynamics within F-actin networks, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we report that the conserved cytoskeletal regulator twinfilin is responsible for CP's rapid dynamics and specific localization in cells. Depletion of twinfilin led to stable association between CP and cellular F-actin arrays, as well as to its retrograde movement throughout leading-edge lamellipodia. These were accompanied by diminished F-actin turnover rates. In vitro single-filament imaging approaches revealed that twinfilin directly promotes dissociation of CP from filament barbed ends, while enabling subsequent filament depolymerization. These results uncover a bipartite mechanism that controls how actin cytoskeleton-mediated forces are generated in cells.

Capping protein is dispensable for polarized actin network growth and actin-based motility

Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) binds the rapidly growing barbed ends of actin filaments and prevents the addition (or loss) of subunits. Capping activity is generally considered to be essential for actin-based motility induced by Arp2/3 complex nucleation. By stopping barbed end growth, CP favors nucleation of daughter filaments at the functionalized surface where the Arp2/3 complex is activated, thus creating polarized network growth, which is necessary for movement. However, here using an in vitro assay where Arp2/3 complex-based actin polymerization is induced on bead surfaces in the absence of CP, we produce robust polarized actin growth and motility. This is achieved either by adding the actin polymerase Ena/VASP or by boosting Arp2/3 complex activity at the surface. Another actin polymerase, the formin FMNL2, cannot substitute for CP, showing that polymerase activity alone is not enough to override the need for CP. Interfering with the polymerase activity of Ena/VASP, its surface recruitment or its bundling activity all reduce Ena/VASP's ability to maintain polarized network growth in the absence of CP. Taken together, our findings show that CP is dispensable for polarized actin growth and motility in situations where surface-directed polymerization is favored by whatever means over the growth of barbed ends in the network.

A novel labeling strategy reveals that myosin Va and myosin Vb bind the same dendritically polarized vesicle population.

Neurons are specialized cells with a polarized geometry and several distinct subdomains that require specific complements of proteins. Delivery of transmembrane proteins requires vesicle transport, which is mediated by molecular motor proteins. The myosin V family of motor proteins mediates transport to the barbed end of actin filaments, and little is known about the vesicles bound by myosin V in neurons. We developed a novel strategy to visualize myosin V-labeled vesicles in cultured hippocampal neurons and systematically characterized the vesicle populations labeled by myosin Va and Vb. We find that both myosins bind vesicles that are polarized to the somatodendritic domain where they undergo bidirectional long-range transport. A series of two-color imaging experiments showed that myosin V specifically colocalized with two different vesicle populations: vesicles labeled with the transferrin receptor and vesicles labeled by low-density lipoprotein receptor. Finally, coexpression with Kinesin-3 family members found that myosin V binds vesicles concurrently with KIF13A or KIF13B, supporting the hypothesis that coregulation of kinesins and myosin V on vesicles is likely to play an important role in neuronal vesicle transport. We anticipate that this new assay will be applicable in a broad range of cell types to determine the function of myosin V motor proteins.

The Activities of the Gelsolin Homology Domains of Flightless-I in Actin Dynamics.

Flightless-I is a unique member of the gelsolin superfamily alloying six gelsolin homology domains and leucine-rich repeats. Flightless-I is an established regulator of the actin cytoskeleton, however, its biochemical activities in actin dynamics are still largely elusive. To better understand the biological functioning of Flightless-I we studied the actin activities of Drosophila Flightless-I by in vitro bulk fluorescence spectroscopy and single filament fluorescence microscopy, as well as in vivo genetic approaches. Flightless-I was found to interact with actin and affects actin dynamics in a calcium-independent fashion in vitro. Our work identifies the first three gelsolin homology domains (1–3) of Flightless-I as the main actin-binding site; neither the other three gelsolin homology domains (4–6) nor the leucine-rich repeats bind actin. Flightless-I inhibits polymerization by high-affinity (∼nM) filament barbed end capping, moderately facilitates nucleation by low-affinity (∼μM) monomer binding, and does not sever actin filaments. Our work reveals that in the presence of profilin Flightless-I is only able to cap actin filament barbed ends but fails to promote actin assembly. In line with the in vitro data, while gelsolin homology domains 4–6 have no effect on in vivo actin polymerization, overexpression of gelsolin homology domains 1–3 prevents the formation of various types of actin cables in the developing Drosophila egg chambers. We also show that the gelsolin homology domains 4–6 of Flightless-I interact with the C-terminus of Drosophila Disheveled-associated activator of morphogenesis formin and negatively regulates its actin assembly activity.