Banff Classification Of Allograft Pathology Research Articles

Inflammation in Areas of Fibrosis Precedes Loss of Kidney Function in Lupus Nephritis.

Interstitial fibrosis in lupus nephritis (LN) is often infiltrated by immune cells but typically regarded as nonspecific "scar reaction." This study aimed to investigate the relationship between inflammatory fibrosis and kidney disease progression in LN. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) were scored in 124 LN kidney biopsies. Inflammation in areas of IFTA (i-IFTA) was graded 0-3 according to the Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology. Significant glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss was defined as a decline of >15 ml/min at 3 years from biopsy. Immune cell phenotype was defined by serial immunohistochemistry (13-plex). IFTA was observed in 88/124 (71%) biopsies, and i-IFTA was identified in 76/88 (86%) cases. The distribution of i-IFTA grades was heterogenous across all IFTA grades. In patients with moderate-to-severe IFTA (>25%), the degree of i-IFTA was associated with a higher risk of significant GFR loss: 0/2 (0%), 1/3 (33%), 3/4 (75%), and 7/9 (78%) for i-IFTA grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.028). Multiplexed histology revealed that i-IFTA was mostly composed of CD163+ macrophages and CD4 T cells, followed by CD8 T cells and granulocytes. I-IFTA is frequently observed in LN and is dominated by macrophages and T cells. For patients with baseline IFTA >25%, the degree of i-IFTA emerged as a predictor of GFR loss. These data support the routine scoring of i-IFTA in LN due to its prognostic implications and nominate i-IFTA as a potential therapeutic target. Scar tissue often contains immune cells, but we still do not fully understand their role. In lupus nephritis (LN), this is typically dismissed as "nonspecific inflammation". However, our study analyzed kidney biopsies from 124 people with LN and found that inflammation in scarred areas may predict future kidney function loss. Specifically, we identified a type of immune cell, CD163+ macrophages, that may contribute to scarring and kidney damage. Our findings suggest that routinely assessing inflammation in scarred areas could help predict kidney health in LN patients and highlight a possible new target for therapies to prevent kidney damage.

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis: manifestation of placental alloantibody-mediated rejection

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (chronic intervillositis) is defined by a diffuse infiltration of monocytes into the intervillous space, which often leads to poor obstetrical outcomes, including recurrent intrauterine growth restriction, miscarriage, and fetal death. The pathogenesis of chronic intervillositis is still poorly defined, and there is an unmet medical need for improved management. This study aimed to demonstrate the role of anti-human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies in the pathogenesis of chronic intervillositis through the application of criteria used in solid-organ transplantation for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. A multidisciplinary research study based on thorough immunologic and pathologic investigations was carried out for 2 separate couples who experienced recurrent secondary fetal losses following a first normal pregnancy associated with histologic evidence of chronic intervillositis. Very high levels of complement-fixing, fetus-specific antibodies targeting mismatched human leukocyte antigen alleles, harbored by the 2 paternal haplotypes, were identified in both cases. Polymorphic human leukocyte antigens were expressed on the surface of trophoblastic villi of the inflamed placenta but not in healthy placental tissue. The binding of alloantibodies to paternal human leukocyte antigens induced dramatic activation of the complement classical pathway in trophoblastic villi, leading to C4d deposition and formation of the terminal complex C5b-9. All requirements for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated placental rejection were fulfilled according to the criteria used in the Banff classification of allograft pathology. In silico analysis was performed using a human leukocyte antigen epitope viewer to reconstitute the human leukocyte antigen sensitization history. Reactivity against a single mismatched epitope present in the first-born healthy child accounted for a broad sensitization to human leukocyte antigens, including those harbored by the 2 paternal haplotypes. This finding explained the high rates of chronic intervillositis recurrence during subsequent pregnancies. This study provides novel mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of chronic intervillositis and provides new avenues for individualized counseling and therapeutic options.

Significance of revised criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection in the 2017 Banff classification: Surveillance by 1-year protocol biopsies for kidney transplantation.

Diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA-TCMR) were revised in the Banff 2017 consensus, but it is unknown whether the new criteria predict graft prognosis of kidney transplantation. We enrolled 406 kidney allograft recipients who underwent a 1-year protocol biopsy (PB) and investigated the diagnostic significance of Banff 2017. Interobserver reproducibility of the 3 diagnosticians showed a substantial agreement rate of 0.68 in Fleiss's kappa coefficient. Thirty-three patients (8%) were classified as CA-TCMR according to Banff 2017, and 6 were previously diagnosed as normal, 12 as acute TCMR, 10 with borderline changes, and 5 as CA-TCMR according to Banff 2015 criteria. Determinant factors of CA-TCMR were cyclosporine use (vs tacrolimus), previous acute rejection, and BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. In survival analysis, the new diagnosis of CA-TCMR predicted a composite graft endpoint defined as doubling serum creatinine or death-censored graft loss (log-rank test, P<.001). In multivariate analysis, CA-TCMR was associated with the second highest risk of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio: 5.42; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-14.61; P<.001 vs normal) behind antibody-mediated rejection. In conclusion, diagnosis of CA-TCMR in Banff 2017 may facilitate detecting an unfavorable prognosis of kidney allograft recipients who undergo a 1-year PB.

Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection: Banff classification and beyond.

Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection is dependent on interpretation of renal allograft biopsies. The Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology, which was developed as a standardized working classification system in 1991, has contributed to the standardization of definitions for histologic injuries resulting from renal allograft rejections and provided a universal grading system for assessing these injuries. It has also helped to provide insight into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to transplant rejection. In addition to histological and immunologic parameters, molecular tools are now being used to facilitate the diagnosis of rejection. In this review, I will discuss morphologic features of renal transplant rejections as well as major revisions and pitfalls of the Banff classification system, and provide future perspectives.

A 2018 Reference Guide to the Banff Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology.

The Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology is an international consensus classification for the reporting of biopsies from solid organ transplants. Since its initial conception in 1991 for renal transplants, it has undergone review every 2 years, with attendant updated publications. The rapid expansion of knowledge in the field has led to numerous revisions of the classification. The resultant dispersal of relevant content makes it difficult for novices and experienced pathologists to faithfully apply the classification in routine diagnostic work and in clinical trials. This review shall provide a complete and simple illustrated reference guide of the Banff Classification of Kidney Allograft Pathology based on all publications including the 2017 update. It is intended as a concise desktop reference for pathologists and clinicians, providing definitions, Banff Lesion Scores and Banff Diagnostic Categories. An online website reference guide hosted by the Banff Foundation for Allograft Pathology (www.banfffoundation.org) is being developed, which will be updated with future refinement of the Banff Classification from 2019 onward.

History of the Banff classification of allograft pathology as it approaches its 20th year

To revisit the history and main defining characteristics of the Banff classification. From small beginnings in 1991 the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology has grown to be the major standard setting force in renal transplant pathology and in international clinical trials of new antirejection agents. The meeting and classification has unique history, consensus generation mechanisms, funding, and tradition, and looks poised to continue for at least another 20 years. The Banff meetings also deal with setting standards for most other areas of solid organ transplantation and increasingly incorporate training courses and working groups so the activity never stops. The Banff meeting has gone from being just another meeting to becoming the embodiment of the global standard, The Banff Classification, by which we determine the presence of rejection and other important disease conditions in the transplanted organ. It is crucial for patient care and crucial for clinical trials of new therapies that it remains updated and modern, an important dynamic yardstick against which we measure clinical success.