The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of directional branches using self-expandable stent grafts (SESGs) or balloon-expandable stent grafts (BESGs) during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Patients treated with fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair in a prospective study using directional branches were included in the study. Choice of bridging stent evolved from SESG to BESG (Gore VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) in February 2017. Target artery instability (TAI) was defined by stent occlusion, stenosis, separation, type IC or type IIIC endoleak, reintervention, rupture, or death due to target artery complication. End points included technical success; target artery patency; and freedom from TAI, type IC or type IIIC endoleak, and reintervention. There were 118 patients (60% male; mean age, 75 ± 7 years) with 296 renal-mesenteric arteries targeted by directional branches using SESGs in 69 patients/162 arteries or BESGs in 49 patients/134 arteries. Patients in both groups had similar aneurysm diameter, target artery diameter, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm extent, which was I to III in 90%. Patients treated by SESGs had significantly (P < .05) shorter stent length (−7 mm), larger stent diameter (+1 mm), and more adjunctive bare-metal stents (74% vs 10%). Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no 30-day mortality. Mean follow-up was significantly longer among patients treated by SESGs (19 ± 12 months vs 6 ± 5 months). TAI occurred in 19 directional branches (6%), including 2 stent occlusions (all SESGs), 5 stenoses (3 SESGs, 2 BESGs), 2 separations (all SESGs), 9 type IC endoleaks (2 SESGs, 7 BESGs), and 4 type IIIC endoleaks (3 SESGs, 1 BESG), resulting in 15 reinterventions. At 1 year, there was no difference in primary (97% ± 1% vs 98% ± 1%; P = .77) and secondary patency (99% ± 1% vs 100%; P = .38) for SESGs and BESGs, respectively. However, SESGs had higher freedom from TAI (96% ± 2% vs 90% ± 4%; P = .005), type IC and type IIIC endoleaks (98% ± 1% vs 91% ± 3%; P = .003), and reinterventions (96% ± 1% vs 92% ± 4%; P = .02) compared with BESGs (Table). Factors associated with TAI were renal artery target (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .03) and lack of adjunctive bare-metal stents (odds ratio, 0.2; P = .004). Directional branches were associated with high technical success and low rates of occlusion or stenosis, independent of stent type. However, freedom from TAI was lower for BESGs because of more target artery endoleaks.TableThe 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates ratesBESG (n = 49 patients/134 arteries)SESG (n = 69 patients/162 arteries)P valueAll target arteries (n = 296) Primary patency98 ± 197 ± 1.77 Secondary patency10099 ± 1.38 Freedom from TAI90 ± 496 ± 2.005 Freedom from target artery reintervention92 ± 496 ± 1.02Renal artery targets (n = 108) Primary patency96 ± 492 ± 3.76 Secondary patency10096 ± 3.37 Freedom from TAI80 ± 892 ± 4.003 Freedom from target artery reintervention83 ± 894 ± 3.01Celiac and superior mesenteric artery targets (n = 188) Primary patency99 ± 1100.26 Secondary patency100100NA Freedom from TAI96 ± 298 ± 1.38 Freedom from target artery reintervention97 ± 298 ± 1.69BESG, balloon-expandable stent graft; NA, not applicable; SESG, self-expandable stent graft; TAI, target artery instability.Values are presented as percentage ± standard error. Boldface entries indicate statistical significance. Open table in a new tab
Read full abstract