Balloon-expandable Stent-grafts Research Articles

Hybrid Stent Graft Technique in Bridging Hostile Renal Arteries in Thoraco-abdominal Branched Endografting

Patency of target arteries is crucial for fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Occlusions more frequently occur in renal arteries (RAs) than in coeliac and superior mesenteric arteries, especially in patients with hostile anatomy treated by BEVAR. This study aimed to report RA outcomes using a hybrid bridging stent graft technique with distal self expandable (SE) combined with proximal balloon expandable (BE) stent graft during BEVAR with hostile RA anatomies. Clinical data from consecutive patients treated for TAAA by F/B-EVAR in three aortic centres (two in the USA, one in Europe) from 2016 to 2022 were prospectively collected. Renal artery orientation was defined as hostile in case of upward (type B) or downward + upward (type D) orientation. Hostile RAs accommodated by BEVAR and combination of SE + BE stent grafts were retrospectively evaluated. Intra-operative RA related complications, technical success, and branch occlusions were assessed as early outcomes. Primary and secondary RA patency, freedom from RA related re-interventions, and freedom from RA instability were assessed during follow up. Of 584 TAAAs managed by F/B-EVAR, 83 patients (14.2%) had 125 hostile RAs (type B, 45.6%; type D, 54.4%) managed by BEVAR with hybrid SE + BE stent grafts. Intra-operative complications occurred in three RAs (2.4%), including two dissections and one disconnection, all successfully managed with additional stent. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no RA occlusions at 30 days. The median follow up was 21 (interquartile range 4, 38) months. Estimated three year RA primary patency was 97 ± 2%. Re-interventions were performed in five RAs (4.0%), including two RA branch embolisations for bleeding, two catheter thrombectomies with stent relining (bilateral occlusion in one patient), and one revision of type Ic endoleak. Freedom from RA related re-interventions and RA instability was 95 ± 2% and 91 ± 3% at three years, respectively. Renal artery secondary patency was 99 ± 1% at three years. In hostile RA anatomies, a combination of distal SE and proximal BE stent grafts as bridging stenting in BEVAR is safe and effective, with low rates of occlusion, re-interventions, and branch instability at midterm follow up.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Self-Expandable vs. Balloon-Expandable Stent Grafts in Visceral Artery Aneurysm Management.

This study assesses the efficacy and safety of self-expandable (SE) versus balloon-expandable (BE) stent grafts for managing visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs), focusing on procedural success and complication rates. We conducted a retrospective analysis of VAA patients treated at our institution from April 2006 to September 2021. The study reviewed patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes, including endoleaks. Among the 23 patients analyzed, splenic artery aneurysms represented 44% of cases. Fifteen patients were treated with balloon-expandable stent grafts (BE SGs), and eight patients were treated with self-expandable stent grafts (SE SGs). For saccular aneurysms, the average neck size was 10.10 ± 8.70 mm in the BE group versus 18.50 ± 3.40 mm in the SE group (p = 0.23), with an average sac size of 20.10 ± 18.9 mm in the BE group versus 15.60 ± 12.7 mm in the SE group (p = 0.16). The average sac-to-neck ratio was 1.69 ± 2.23 in the BE group versus 1.38 ± 0.33 in the SE group (p = 0.63). The BE group exhibited a significantly higher endoleak rate (60%) compared to the SE group (12.5%; p = 0.03). While further investigation is needed to fully assess the outcomes of stent graft treatment for VAAs, initial data show a significantly higher endoleak rate with BE SGs compared to SE SGs. The SE SGs may offer better outcomes due to their superior ability to conform to tortuous and mobile visceral arteries.

The Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable stent graft as a bridging stent in complex endovascular aortic procedures at 3 years performs better in fenestrations

ObjectiveComplex endovascular procedures are now recognized as the gold standard treatments for extensive aortic diseases. Bridging stents (covered stents used to couple the aortic graft to the visceral vessels) play a pivotal role, yet there is currently no dedicated device available on the market. The aim of the study was to evaluate the midterm performance of the Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable (VBX) stent graft as a bridging stent for target visceral vessels (TVVs). MethodsData from all consecutive patients who underwent a fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair and received the VBX stent graft as a bridging stent between July 2018 and September 2022 were prospectively collected and subsequently analyzed retrospectively. Primary end points included freedom from TVV instability and freedom from TVV-related reinterventions, both overall and in comparison between branched and fenestrated graft configurations. Secondary end points were overall survival, procedure and TVV-related (in an intent-to-treat basis) technical success, freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleak, and freedom from TVV patency loss. ResultsSixty-three patients were treated with a fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair using the VBX stent graft as a bridging stent, of whom 47 (74.6%) presented an atherosclerotic aneurysm, 7 (11.1%) a post-dissecative aneurysm, and 9 (14.3%) an anastomotic pseudoaneursym or a type IA endoleak in a previous endovascular aortic repair. Included in the aortic repair were 231 of 243 (95.1%) total visceral vessels. The intraoperative requirement of 13 additional VBX stent grafts determined a TVV-related technical success of 94.4%. The mean follow-up was 26.1 ± 16.4 months. The estimated overall survival at 36 months was 73% ± 7.5%. The estimated rates at 36 months for freedom from type IC/IIIC endoleaks and TVV primary patency were 90.6% ± 3.9% and 99% ± 0.7%, respectively. The estimated rate at 36 months for freedom from TVV instability was 92.1% ± 3% and did not differ between branched and fenestrated configurations, whereas freedom from TVV-related reinterventions was 90.6% ± 3.1% and significantly in favor of fenestrations (69.4% vs 96.8%, P < .001). Multivariate analyses confirmed fenestrated configuration as a protective factor against TVV-related reinterventions (hazard ratio: 0.079; 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.403). ConclusionsThe VBX stent graft proves to be a reliable bridging stent for complex aortic procedures involving both fenestrated and branched endografts. Although immediate results are deemed satisfactory, they favor fenestrations regarding the need of reinterventions through 3 years. The success of the procedure heavily relies on a thorough understanding of the unique characteristics of this stent.

Assessment of Bridging Stents in In Situ Laser Fenestrations of Aortic Endografts With Intravascular Ultrasound

ObjectiveTreatment of complex aortic aneurysms with the in situ laser fenestration (ISLF) technique involves implantation of a balloon expandable stent graft (bSG) in the created fenestration. Adequate expansion of this bSG is of importance both to achieve seal and to ensure target vessel stability. This experimental study assessed the expansion rate of different bSGs in the ISLF setting using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). MethodsA commercially available aortic endograft was used to test the laser fenestration technique (Zenith Alpha, Cook Medical LLC, Bloomington, IN, USA). The ISLF was stented with the following bSGs: two Gore Viabahn VBX balloon expandable endoprostheses (WL Gore & Associates, Bloomington, IL, USA), three BeGraft Peripheral and three BeGraft Plus (Bentley InnoMed GmbH; Hechingen, Germany), and three Advanta V12 (Atrium, Hudson, NH, USA). The bSGs were expanded in three steps: (1) nominal, (2) rated burst pressure, and (3) dilatation with a non-compliant balloon at 15 atmospheres. After each step, an IVUS assessment of the bSG minimal diameter and the area at the fenestration (FA) and in a fully expanded segment distal to the fenestration (SA) was performed. A mean of the three IVUS measurements was used as the value for comparison. An insufficient bSG expansion was defined as a mean of FA/SA of < 0.8 (i.e., < 80% expansion). ResultsThe VBX was the only bSG that could be expanded to its intended diameter (i.e., at least 80%) at nominal pressure. The BeGraft Peripheral and BeGraft Plus showed the lowest expansion degrees after nominal and rated burst pressure. All bSGs that were tested reached a sufficient expansion degree after the use of a higher pressure balloon. ConclusionIn this ex vivo experiment, a dilatation up to nominal pressure showed satisfactory expansion only for the VBX. The consistency of the results when applied to the different types of stent grafts that were analysed reflects structural stent graft specific issues to consider when choosing the right device in cases of ISLF.

Anatomical suitability for branched endovascular aortic arch repair and balloon-expandable bridging stent grafts in a cohort of patients previously treated with a hybrid approach

ObjectiveWe assessed the suitability of two triple branch arch devices (aBranch) (Terumo aortic and Cook Medical) and a balloon-expandable covered stent (VBX, W. L. Gore & Associates, Johnson & Johnson) to incorporate the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) in a cohort previously treated with hybrid thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR). MethodsThis is a single-center, retrospective, all-comers, preclinical suitability study. We conducted an analysis of preoperative computed tomography scans in surgical patients between 1999 and 2022 in a single vascular surgery unit. The primary outcome was the aortic suitability of aBranch devices and VBX as mating stent for BCT in previous hybrid TEVAR. Hybrid repair of the aortic arch included TEVAR, fenestrated or branched TEVAR associated with any surgical debranching of the supra-aortic trunks and chimney TEVAR with proximal landing in zones 0 to 2. Secondary outcomes included (i) suitability assessment when excluding minor instruction for use (IFU) criteria, (ii) a comparison of suitable and nonsuitable patients, (iii) risk factors analysis for nonsuitability, and (iv) a description of the exclusion causes. ResultsDuring the study period, 120 patients were treated. Among elective patients (n = 73), the suitability of any aBranch was 82.2% (60/73) and VBX was suitable in 64.4% of BCTs (47/73). The aBranch suitable patients had a significantly longer sinotubular-BCT length (P = .017) and smaller distal ascending aorta (P = .043) as compared with nonsuitable ones. The suitability of Terumo Aortic and Cook Medical devices was 52.1% (38/73) and 46.6% (34/73), respectively. When minor IFU criteria were ignored, suitability increased to 82.2% (60/73) and 63.0% (46/73), respectively. Left common carotid artery diameter and sinotubular-BCT length were significant nonsuitability risk factors for Terumo Aortic aBranch in multivariable analysis. No associations were found for Cook Medical device. The outcomes were tested in the entire cohort demonstrating a global suitability of 82.9%, increasing to 86.3% when ignoring minor IFUs. VBX was anatomically suitable to use in BCT in 73.2% of patient BCTs. ConclusionsaBranch devices are anatomically suitable in a vast majority of patients (86%) undergoing hybrid TEVAR. The innominate artery seems eligible for incorporation with VBX in almost two-thirds of patients. This mating stent may help to overcome some minor IFU restrictions.

Outcomes of the Gore® Excluder® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis Using Self Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Stent Grafts for the Internal Iliac Artery Component

Objective: The GORE® EXCLUDER® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona) was developed to be used in combination with a self-expanding stent graft (SESG) for the internal iliac artery (IIA) bridging stent. Balloon-expandable stent grafts (BESGs) are an alternative for the IIA, offering advantages in sizing, device tracking, precision, and lower profile delivery. We compared the performance of SESG and BESG when used as the IIA bridging stent in patients undergoing EVAR with IBE. Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent EVAR with IBE implantation at a single center from October 2016 to May 2021. Anatomic and procedural characteristics were recorded via chart review and computed tomography (CT) postprocessing software (Vitrea® v7.14). Devices were assigned to SESG vs. BESG groups based on the type of device landing into the most distal IIA segment. Analysis was performed per device to account for patients undergoing bilateral IBE. The primary endpoint was IIA patency, and secondary endpoint was IBE-related endoleak. Results: During the study period, 48 IBE devices were implanted in 41 patients (mean age 71.1 years). All IBE devices were implanted in conjunction with an infrarenal endograft. There were 24 devices in each of the self-expanding internal iliac component (SE-IIC) and balloon-expandable internal iliac component (BE-IIC) groups. The BE-IIC group had smaller diameter IIA target vessels (11.6±2.0 mm vs. 8.4±1.7 mm, p<0.001). Mean follow-up was 525 days. Loss of IIA patency occurred in 2 SESG devices (8.33%) at 73 and 180 days postprocedure, and in zero BESG devices, however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.16). There was 1 IBE-related endoleak requiring reintervention during the study period. A BESG device required reintervention due to Type 3 endoleak at 284 days. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in outcomes between SESG and BESG when used for the IIA bridging stent in EVAR with IBE. The BESGs were associated with using 2 IIA bridging stents and were more often deployed in smaller IIA target arteries. Retrospective study design and small sample size may limit the generalizability of our findings. Clinical Impact This series compares postoperative and midterm outcomes of self expanding stent grafts and balloon expandable stent grafts (BESG) when used as the internal iliac stent graft as part of a Gore® Excluder® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE). With similar outcomes between the two stent-grafts, our series suggests that some of the advantages of BESG, device sizing, tracking, deployment, and profile, may be able to be leveraged without impacting the mid-term performance of the IBE.

Mid-term Renal and Mesenteric Artery Outcomes During Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in The United States Aortic Research Consortium.

To report mid-term outcomes of renal-mesenteric target arteries (TA) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAAs). TA instability (TAI) is the most frequent indication for reintervention after FB-EVAR. Data from consecutive patients enrolled in nine prospective non-randomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (PS-IDE) studies between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed. TA outcomes through 5 years of follow-up were analyzed for vessels incorporated by fenestrations or directional branches (DBs), including TA patency, endoleak, integrity failure, reintervention, and instability. A total of 1,681 patients had 6349 renal-mesenteric arteries were targeted using 3720 fenestrations (59%), 2435 DBs (38%) and 194 scallops (3%). Mean follow was 23±21 months. At 5-years, TAs incorporated by fenestrations had higher primary (95±1% vs. 91±1%, P<0.001 ) and secondary patency (98±1% vs. 94±1%, P<0.001) , and higher freedom from TAI (87±2% vs. 84±2%, P=0.002) compared to TAs incorporated by DBs, with no differences in other TA events. DBs targeted by balloon-expandable stent-grafts (BESGs) had significantly lower freedom from TAI (78±4% vs. 88±1%, P=0.006 ), TA endoleak (87±3% vs. 97±1%, P<0.001 ), and TA reintervention (83±4% vs. 95±1%, P<0.00 1 ) compared to those targeted by self-expandable stent-grafts (SESGs). Incorporation of renal and mesenteric TA during FB-EVAR is safe and durable with high 5-year patency rates and low freedom from TAI. DBs have lower patency rates and lower freedom from TAI than fenestrations, with better performance for SESGs as compared to BESGs.

Effect of bridging stent graft selection for directional branches on target artery outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in the United States Aortic Research Consortium

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of directional branches (DBs) bridging stent choice on target artery (TA) outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. MethodsPatients enrolled in nine prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies in the United States between 2005 and 2020 were analyzed. All patients who had at least one TA incorporated by DB using either self-expandable (SESGs), balloon-expandable (BESGs), or hybrid stent graft combinations (HSGs). Endpoints were TA patency and freedom from TA endoleak, instability, and reintervention. ResultsThere were 800 patients with 2426 renal-mesenteric arteries incorporated by DBs. DB stent selection was SESGs in 1205 TAs (50%), BESGs in 1095 TAs (45%), and HSGs in 126 TAs (5%). SESGs were predominantly used in the first three quartiles of the study period, whereas BESGs comprised 75% of all stents between 2017 and 2020. The median follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range, 6-35 months). At 5 years, BESGs had significantly lower freedom from TA instability (78% ± 4% vs 88% ± 1% vs 96% ± 2%; log-rank P =.010), freedom from TA endoleaks (87% ± 3% vs 97% ± 1% vs 99% ± 1%; log-rank P < .001), and freedom from TA reintervention (83% ± 4% vs 95% ± 1% vs 99% ± 2%; log-rank P <.001) compared with SESGs or HSGs, respectively. For renal arteries, there was no difference in freedom from TA instability for BESGs, SESGs, or HSGs. However, freedom from TA endoleaks and reintervention were lower for renal arteries targeted by BESGs compared with DBs targeted by SESGs and HSGs (83% ± 6% vs 98% ± 1% vs 100%; log-rank P < .001; and 70% ± 10% vs 92% ± 1% vs 96% ± 4%; log-rank P = .022). For mesenteric arteries, DBs targeted by BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, endoleak, and reintervention than SESGs or HSGs. In stent-specific analysis, iCAST BESGs had the lowest freedom from TA instability either for renal or mesenteric arteries, primarily due to higher rates of TA endoleaks. There was no difference in patency in any scenario. Independent predictors of TA instability were age (+1-year: hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99), stent diameter (+1 mm: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80), and BESG (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9). ConclusionsDBs incorporated using BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, TA endoleak, and TA reintervention compared with SESGs and HSGs. The patency of DBs was not affected by the type of stent construction. The observed performance disadvantage associated with BESGs appears to have largely been driven by iCAST usage.

Type Ic Endoleak after LifeStream Balloon-Expandable Stent Graft and Zenith Iliac Branch Device Placement

Considering the recent advancements in endovascular management of aortoiliac aneurysms, the use of an iliac branch device (IBD) to preserve pelvic blood flow and reduce complications caused by embolization of the internal iliac artery (IIA) is recommended by various guidelines. Although the outcomes reported following IBD placement are mainly positive and durable, IBD-specific complications such as a type Ic endoleak and associated reintervention may occur. Moreover, only one IBD device and one type of balloon-expandable bridging stent graft for IIA are currently available on the domestic market. Here we present two cases of type Ic endoleak following IBD placement. In both cases, IIA diameter was slightly larger than the basic instructions for use. Notably, the initial procedures were considered successful; however, type Ic endoleaks were detected on 1-month follow-up imaging. This finding emphasizes the need for a precise preoperative evaluation, intraoperative manipulation, and postoperative follow-up.

Early experience with covered endovascular reconstruction of the Iliac bifurcation for non-occlusive disease

PURPOSETo present early experience with covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation in patients with non-occlusive aortoiliac disease. MATERIALS AND METHODSRetrospective analysis of patients treated with covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation between 2013 and 2022, in a single institute for non-occlusive disease. Patients’ demographics, medical history, clinical status, procedural and follow-up data were collected. Endpoints of the study were technical success, complications, patency and need for re-intervention. RESULTSSeven patients were treated with covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation. All the procedures were technically successful. No patient required additional interventions. The median follow-up was 29 months (range 12-48 months). No evidence of endoleak was documented in follow up. CONCLUSIONThe treatment of iliac penetrating ulcers, or aneurysms involving the IIAs or the iliac bifurcations using the covered endovascular repair of the bifurcation, is technically feasible in selected patients and anatomies. Balloon expandable stent-grafts offer an alternative in repairing the above pathologies with a simple technique and shorter arterial coverage, while the low-profile sheaths enable treatment through calcified access vessels and of small diameter arteries.

Preliminary experience with new generation balloon expandable stent-graft in the treatment of innominate artery obstructive disease.

The aim of this study was to describe a single center preliminary experience with the use of a specific balloon expandable stent-graft for the treatment of innominate artery (IA) obstructive lesions. We report our experience with four male patients treated with Gore Viabahn balloon (Gore Medical, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) expandable stent-graft for different types of IA stenosis: three patients were symptomatic for vertebrobasilar insufficiency, while one patient was asymptomatic for cerebrovascular symptoms. The stent grafts were deployed using retrograde (N.=2) or antegrade approach (N.=2), aiming to cover the entire lesions length and to slightly protrude into the aortic arch. Post-dilatation was performed with a compliant balloon. One patient presented a tandem lesion (IA and right internal carotid artery) and after the stenting of the IA he was treated also with a carotid artery stenting during the same procedure. Technical success was achieved in all patients. No perioperative or postoperative complications had been reported and the neurological disorders disappeared for the three symptomatic patients. After a mean clinical and radiological follow-up of 24±5 months, all the stents were patent and perfectly adapted to the vessels. This preliminary clinical experience shows that the use of the Gore Viabahn balloon (Gore Medical) expandable stent-graft seems safe and feasible for the treatment of the IA obstructive lesions, also in presence of irregular plaques and hostile anatomies for an endovascular treatment. Larger experiences and long-term data are mandatory.

Novel endovascular technique for repair of superior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula with portal vein aneurysm

BackgroundA superior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula (SMAVF) is a rare, aberrant connection between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV). Management includes either open surgical repair or endovascular repair with embolization coils or covered stents. We report a novel in-stent coil embolization technique successfully used for repair of a challenging SMAVF. Case presentationA 56-year-old man presented with an enlarging SMV and portal vein aneurysm. His history was significant for a small bowel resection of a desmoid tumor 14 years prior. Computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed a high-flow SMAVF in the midsegment of the SMA, and the patient was taken to the operating room for endovascular repair. Embolization was initially attempted with detachable coils, but this approach was aborted as the coils did not have sufficient purchase to anchor securely and would migrate into the portal venous system prior to full release and deployment. Placement of a covered stent in the SMA to exclude the fistulous connection was not feasible due to the presence of multiple adjacent major SMA branches. Therefore, a balloon-expandable covered stent was placed across the fistula and crushed distally to create a blind end into which embolization coils were able to nest without migrating. This was achieved with the use of multiple buddy wires to deploy a VBX balloon-expandable stent graft (WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) across the fistulous connection and crush the distal end of the stent with a buddy balloon. The funneled covered stent then served as a backstop for packing with embolization coils, and completion angiography demonstrated complete occlusion of the SMAVF and filling of all SMA branches. Both 6-month and 1-year postoperative surveillance CT scans confirmed continued resolution of the fistula. ConclusionThis case demonstrates a novel endovascular technique to create a funneled covered stent across a high-flow SMAVF as a platform to enable embolization and prevent coil migration. This in-stent coil embolization technique is a viable option for cases in which embolization coils and covered stents fail or are unsuitable.

In Situ Laser Fenestration Technique: Bench-Testing of Aortic Endograft to Guide Clinical Practice

Purpose: In situ laser fenestration (ISLF) is a recently introduced technology that offers the potential to perform total endovascular treatment of aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies in the acute setting. This experiment’s aim was to assess ISLF in some currently common aortic endografts and bridging stent-grafts. Materials and Methods: Three different aortic endografts were evaluated: (1) Zenith Alpha, (2) Zenith TX2, and (3) Conformable GORE TAG. Each endograft was submerged in 37°C saline to create fenestrations using the 308 nm CVX-300 Excimer Laser System fitted with a 2.3 mm diameter Turbo-Elite laser atherectomy catheter compatible with a 0.018″ guidewire. Three different 8 mm bridging stent-grafts were evaluated: (1) BeGraft peripheral, (2) BeGraft peripheral plus, and (3) GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable. All bridging stent-grafts were deployed and exposed to different balloon sizes and pressures. The ISLFs and bridging stent-grafts were then evaluated for any tears, stenoses, and seal. Results: A laser fenestration was consistently rapidly obtained in the Zenith Alpha and the Zenith TX2 endografts while it proved difficult to achieve a timely fenestration in the C-TAG. No fabric tears were noted in the Zenith Alpha and Zenith TX2 when inflating Armada (Abbott) 8 mm balloon in the fenestrations with pressures up to 15 atmospheres (rated burst pressure) nor when flaring bridging stent-grafts with balloons up to 12 mm in diameter at 10 atmospheres, while major tears were frequently noted in the C-TAG when the Armada 8 mm balloons were inflated. BeGraft Peripheral and BeGraft Peripheral Plus were all firmly attached to the fenestrations showing good seal on manual testing, while every sixth VBX bridging stent-graft displayed poorer attachment to the fenestration before dilatation at high pressure. Commonly, significant stenoses remained in the bridging stent-grafts after dilatation at nominal pressure, which could only be eradicated with high-pressure balloons. Conclusion: In this limited bench-test, Dacron endografts responded well to the ISLF technology. Satisfactory deployment of the bridging stent was noted only after inflation and/or flaring with high-pressure balloons. Further work with different types of commercially-available bridging stent-grafts and endografts to assess the durability of in situ fenestration (ISF) and bridging stents in ISF is recommended. Clinical Impact This report on experimental in situ laser fenestration provide important insights for clinicians considering using in situ laser fenestration of aortic stentgrafts in vivo. In particular, different laser settings were tested together with a selection of aortic stentgrafts. Also, the target pressure needed in PTA balloons to dilate the fenestrations and any subsequent tears in the fabric were noted. This was followed by deployment of assorted balloon-expandable stentgrafts with estimation of residual stenosis and seal.

The Colt Device for Treating Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysms - Concept and Clinical Results.

To report results of application a new stent graft design for the treatment of patients with thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAAs), which was co-invented by a vascular surgeon. This is a retrospective observational study. The Colt is a self-expanding stent graft, composed of nitinol metal stents creating a special exoskeleton with asymmetric springs covered with polyester material. The Colt device offers some advantages over existing stent graft options. The main body is available in two different diameters on both ends and in three different lengths. It has four branches pointing downward and coming from the main stent graft at two levels. It offers the physician an opportunity to decide which branch to choose for the target vessel. It may be implanted alone or extended proximally and distally. Balloon expandable and/or self-expanding stent grafts are used to create the visceral branches. In complex extensive aneurysms, the procedure is divided into two or three stages to minimize the risks of spinal cord ischemia. Between August 2015 and December 2021, twenty-two Colt stent grafts were implanted in twenty males and two females (aged 56-81) with TAAAs (eight Type II; twelve Type III; two Type IV). The mean aneurysm diameter was 73.4 mm (range 64-83). All patients were asymptomatic. Eighty-five target vessels were reconstructed using either self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent grafts. Fourteen bifurcated, six custom-made tubes and two aortouniiliac (AUI) stent grafts were used as distal extensions to the Colt device. Completion angiography revealed no type I endoleaks. Five patients had Type II endoleaks which were treated conservatively. There were no intraoperative deaths. One patient died on the 7th postoperative day from multiorgan failure. We did not observe any other complications within 30 days after implantation. One patient died from Covid-19 two months after discharge. Follow-up ranged from three to 75 months. There was no migration or dislocation of the docking station or proximal and distal extensions. All Colt device prostheses remained patent, however, two branches leading to the coeliac trunk were found occluded at the time of the 12-month CTA, without any symptoms. In two patients, there were late problems with three renal bridging stent grafts. One of the Type II endoleaks resolved spontaneously after one year, while four others remain under observation. No patient had an increase in sac diameter. Results from the current series are promising. The Colt stent graft can be applied to a large variety of TAAA anatomies, which may facilitate the development of new "off-the-shelf" devices in the future.

Abstract No. 75 Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: comparing outcomes of self-expandable vs balloon-expandable stent grafts

Endovascular treatment of visceral aneurysms is effective and successful with low rates of complications. Depending on location and anatomy, endovascular treatment is either embolization or stent graft exclusion. This single-center retrospective study compares the outcomes of Self Expandable (SE) vs. Balloon Expandable (BE) stent grafts (SGs) in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) and pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs).

Abstract No. 82 Bridging stent graft selection for iliac bifurcated grafts: balloon vs. self-expanding stent graft outcomes in a 14-year cohort

To compare long-term outcomes of balloon-expandable stent grafts (BESG), self-expandable stent grafts (SESG) and a combination of SESG and BESG for bridge stenting with iliac bifurcated grafts (IBG) during endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair

Outcomes of the Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis Using Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Stent Grafts for the Internal Iliac Artery Component

Stent graft repair for aortic and iliac artery aneurysms has largely replaced open surgery, and modifications in the design that preserve flow to the pelvis with the Gore Excluder (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) device has led to improved outcomes. The IBE was developed for use in combination with a self-expanding stent graft for the internal iliac component (SE-IIC). Balloon-expandable stent grafts are an alternative for the internal iliac component (BE-IIC), offering advantages in sizing, device tracking, precision, and lower profile delivery.

Fixing Bridge Technique Combining Distal Covered Self-Expandable With Proximal Balloon-Expandable Stent-Graft in Case of Branched Endografting

The aim of the study was to describe the early and midterm results of the fixing bridge technique—a combination of a distal covered self-expandable with proximal balloon expandable stent graft—during branched thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA) repair to limit the incidence of type IIIc endoleak (∼2%).

Outcomes of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable stent graft for endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms using iliac branch endoprosthesis: Presented at the 2021 Vascular Annual Meeting of the Society of Vascular Surgery, San Diego, Calif, August 18-21, 2021.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of internal iliac artery (IIA) stenting using balloon-expandable (BESG) or self-expandable stent grafts (SESG) during endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms with iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE; W. L. Gore, Flagstaff, Ariz).

The Use of a Commercially Available Endovascular Filter Catheter (Capturex®) for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) in a Patient with a Coral Reef Aorta

Due to the risk of mobilizing plaque fragments, transfemoral TEVAR is a potentially dangerous procedure in patients with a coral reef aorta. We describe a practical method for transfemoral TEVAR in a patient with a degenerative thoracic aneurysm and a coral reef aorta. After placing a filter catheter in the abdominal aorta via a contralateral percutaneous femoral access, a working channel through the distal thoracic aorta was created with a balloon-expandable stent graft in the coral reef segment. Thereafter, transfemoral TEVAR could be performed successfully, without any complications. The additional use of a percutaneously placed filter catheter potentially allows reduction of peripheral embolism and hence may prevent patients from more invasive treatment.